The Wilmington Historic Preservation Commission held a regular meeting on Thursday, September 10, 2026, at 5:30 p.m. in City Council Chambers, Skyline Center, 929 N. Front Street, Wilmington, NC. The meeting was called to order by Chair Christopher Yermal and adjourned at 8:07 p.m. The Commission considered nine evidentiary hearings (three old business items continued from August 13, 2026, and six new business items), approved minutes, and discussed additional matters including property conditions and the annual report. Seven commissioners were present throughout; Chair Yermal recused himself from items 1–3 due to a professional conflict, with Vice Chair Joan Keston presiding for those items. All votes on contested items were unanimous.
30 days of the date of the commission's action. Evidence is received during the evidentiary hearing portion of an agenda item. Those who want to address the commission are sworn as witnesses to present material and substantial evidence to the commission. The chair recognizes those who want to submit such evidence during the evidentiary hearing. Evidence should be directed to the commission. To ensure that evidence is properly recorded, please come to the podium to address the commission, state your name and address, and speak clearly. Members of the historic preservation commission are uh appointed by the city council and serve at its discretion. Our responsibility is to protect and preserve properties within the city's designated historic districts. We adhere to the Wilmington design standards for historic districts and landmarks as well as applicable North Carolina state law to assess whether exterior changes align with the unique character of the city's historic districts. It is important that we deliberate the merits of each request in a manner that provides a record of the basis for our decisions. Please remember that our deliberation should center on how a project meets to the design standards and whether the proposed change is congruous or not. Commissioners, if you have been uh I'm sorry, if you have received or been made aware of any outside evidence related to any of the matters, please recuse yourself. And if you would all please turn off your cell phones or set them to silent mode. Thank you for that. I would like to introduce staff over here, stage right, uh, I'm sorry, stage left. We have Gina Esse, Assistant City Attorney, Brian Chambers, assistant planning director, Ben Riggle, Historic Preservation Planning Manager, Alden Finholm, uh historic preservation planner, Amy Bradshaw over to my right, uh planning coordinator. And I've uh commissioners could please introduce themselves, starting over here with Paul. Uh Paul Lawler. Joan Keston. Christopher Yermel. Ashley Wilson. Stephen Salke, Carrie Williams. Uh staff uh will now swear in any witnesses who wish to speak this evening. If you would uh facing over there with um Amy, please. If I could have all applicants, staff and members of the public, if you wish to speak tonight, please stand up and raise your right hand. Do you swear that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? Thank you. Uh so first item of business uh review and approval of the meeting minutes from Thursday, August 13th. Uh we got an email earlier. Paul, if we wanted to make some adjustment to that, we can go ahead and discuss that now, and then we'll get uh a motion for approval. Yes, under um evidentiary hearing number nine, 1403 Market Street, which was the uh church windows. There's notations in here about the um special circumstances, and it noted the institutional nature of the property, and I think that's what was first brought up last meeting, but I think we discussed it and suggested it'd be more perhaps just uh religious institution because if it's all institutions, um that would be uh I mean I hate to see Citicorp and they brings their headquarters down here and claims poverty, they toss all the windows out. Yeah, I mean I I brought up at that meeting just uh it was a broader outlook I had that I was mentioning uh the institutional nature of the building, not necessarily just the fact that it was a religious or church. So uh, and I think in the I'm sorry, in the minutes it does say I'm sorry, Paul. Tell me again in the minutes it does say uh the fact that it was a a church. No, when you spoke and then I added on that it was a church, and that was then added into it. Right. The minutes say institutional, yeah. But uh we also had subsequent discussion when that point came out, and I thought um the the consensus is more of just church to to narrow the exception. Okay. So does that do how do we want someone like to go ahead and state it? How do how do we want because then we're gonna you know get a second and some approval for this? How do we want that to actually be stated then on that note? Um that detail. Yeah. What was that address? Word be the religious nature of the property or the church affiliation. Uh nature of the property as a house of worship. Gina, did does this matter? Yeah.