The Yakima City Council held a study session on February 10, 2026, beginning at 5:03 p.m. and adjourning at 6:49 p.m. The meeting focused on the annual Chronic Nuisance Property report and a comprehensive review of proposed fee changes across the Community Development Department (Planning, Code Administration, and Engineering). Public comment was heard, and no formal votes were taken on the fee proposals; staff will return with a resolution.
You good? All right. Sorry about that little wait there. We're having some technical issues. Clerk, roll call, please. Berg. Here. Brown. Here. Flyers. Present. Len. Here. Gonzalez. Here. Patrickus. Here. Roy. Here. All right. Thank you. Next is public comment. We will allow 15 minutes in this meeting today, which is our study session for public comment. If you would like to you would like to do public comment, there's forms in the back. Come bring them up here. You'll get two and a half minutes to speak. First up is Greg Johnson. I'm Greg Johnson with the Equa Valley Trolleys. Thank you for the opportunity to speak. One thing that many of you may not know about me, actually, when I graduated from college, I spent the first three years of my career at a nonpartisan policy think tank arguing for more sane fiscal policy for our country. And as you guys know that hasn't gone too well, but I tried. But one of the things that we talked about a lot in that uh in those circles in policy circles was a concept of a chart crime, which is a chart that's misleading. And I think that this chart that you're presented with at a recent council meeting fits that definition. Um this chart was presented, I think, to suggest that there's not very much public support for the trolleys. If you look at the trolley, it's down here. But um, if you look at actually the question that was asked to produce the data for this chart, the question was basically forcing people to do a rank ordering of all the different components of the street. And so if you ask me, is the street more important to the street than the trolley is to the street? Yeah, it is. And the sidewalks are more important to the street too. So I remember as I was answering that question personally that I ranked the street higher than the trolley and the sidewalk higher than the trolley. So the fact that the trolley was low on that chart um does not mean, I think what it was presented to mean. Um if you look at the actual uh data um from the city survey, which got over 700 responses. Um, there were two concepts that had the trolley and one concept that did not have the trolley, and 92% of the people that responded favored the two concepts that included the trolley. Um, and that was actually consistent if you look at residents or non-residents alike, so it's not like we flooded it with a bunch of non-residents. Um the public comment was extraordinary. This is one of the meetings um there were tons of people, and for a street like Sixth Avenue, you know, that's a huge amount of engagement for um honestly relatively inconsequential street in the city. Um more recently, as we were uh discussing the operating agreement, um, I'm sure you guys also felt the level of public enthusiasm for the trolleys then, and I apologize that it may have kept some of you from your family obligations. Um but I appreciate that you guys heard the people out on that. And I think um after the agreement was reapproved, um we posted on Facebook, and that post is over 2500 likes now. Um so it's just extraordinary support for the trolleys.