OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Yakima, Washington/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Yakima City Council Regular Meeting – October 13, 2026: Budget, Public Comment, and Kratom Motion

City Council — Tuesday, October 13, 2026
BodyYakima, Washington
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, October 13, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:04:16

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Unassigned speaker

4:07

I

Speaker 1

4:07

will call this council regular business meeting to order.

4:11

Uh clerk, uh, roll call, please.

4:15

Here.

Speaker 2

4:15

Brown?

Speaker 1

4:16

Here.

Speaker 2

4:18

Present.

4:18

Glenn.

4:19

Present.

4:20

Gonzalez.

4:22

Patrick is here.

4:23

Roy?

Speaker 3

4:24

Here.

Speaker 2

4:26

All

Speaker 3

4:26

right.

Unassigned speaker

4:34

I

Speaker 3

4:34

pledge allegiance to the five.

4:38

And to the Republic or we should stand one nation under God.

4:43

Indivisible

Unassigned speaker

4:44

at

Speaker 3

4:44

Liberty Just Rolling.

Speaker 4

5:02

He's still for the subject.

Speaker 1

5:06

Thank

Unassigned speaker

5:06

you.

Speaker 1

5:08

Next we have nothing in the good of the order.

5:12

We will go to public comment.

5:16

So if you plan to provide public comment tonight, please if you haven't already, fill out a request form in the lobby and provide to the city clerk.

5:24

Public comment will last up to 35 minutes.

5:26

Each speaker will have two and a half minutes to provide public comment.

5:30

During public comment, speakers cannot campaign for or against candidates or support or oppose a ballot measure.

5:36

State law prohibits threatening or otherwise intimidating council members or staff.

5:41

During public comment, council members will listen only.

5:43

Council members and staff will not address litigation during public comment.

5:47

Audience members should not clap, wave signs, or otherwise distract the meeting.

5:51

We appreciate uh you guys being here tonight.

5:54

All right.

5:55

First

Unassigned speaker

5:55

up

Speaker 1

5:56

in public comment is uh Kenton Gartrell

Unassigned speaker

6:06

Hi,

Speaker 5

6:06

Kevin Gartrell.

6:07

Most of you know me, uh City of Yacimo resident and county.

6:10

I actually own properties in both.

Unassigned speaker

6:12

Um I'm here to talk to you tonight about item twelve, which is other business, because I am hoping that for procedural reasons and not having to deal with another uh fest in May or March or whatever day you tabled it to, is that I would like the city council to separate understand that Amber Alert Systems are not the same as flock systems, and that polling-wise both conservatives, principled conservatives, and libertarians, and most of the Liberal Democrat Party are against Flock cameras.

Speaker 5

6:45

I would like the council members, uh Ridy Berg and Juliet, sorry I can't pronounce your last name.

6:51

Uh Juliet to bring back a motion which would follow procedures to ban just flock by authorizing the city manager to direct staff to have them removed and given back to the county in an ordinance formulated for this council to then be capable of voting on that meets its needs.

7:08

All of you have an email.

7:09

I did also file a motion into your email that does fit the charter and does actually expand on Amber Alert systems.

7:15

So if you want to create more safety and have those cameras that actually do create safety by data purposes that does exist, the amber alert systems would still be placed up.

Speaker 2

7:25

A

Speaker 5

7:25

license readers would still be up, but you have to get judicial authorization to even access those versus the flock cameras.

7:32

And I could say that as a victim of flock myself because the city of Wapito actually did flock my truck, and they still to this day don't know why the individual flocked my truck.

7:41

Um but the officers no longer hired, so they chose not to do anything about it.

7:46

Um so what I'm saying is that Flock does not create any amount of safety.

7:51

Please get rid of it.

7:52

If you do desire safety, expand your amber alert systems, expand your licensed reader systems, which have nothing to do with flock.

7:59

The second thing is you can't afford flock once you take over that contract once the county gives it to you.

8:04

And the county can't afford flock itself because only a hundred of those cameras, if they get taken down, would bankrupt the county, literally at 2500 to 3,000 dollars a pop per repair, which the contract states that they have to pay for the repair.

8:17

The contract doesn't cover the maintenance or repair of those devices.

8:21

Um nobody has the money.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Budget Equity Analysis██████████████████████████████████████38%
Public Comment█████████████████17%
Public Safety████████████12%
Fiscal Sustainability████████8%
Parks and Recreation██████6%
Public Engagement████4%
Economic Development████4%
Procedural███3%
Substance Use Disorder██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Yakima City Council Regular Meeting – October 13, 2026

The Yakima City Council held its regular meeting on Tuesday, October 13, 2026, beginning at 5:30 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, WA. The meeting included a public comment period allotted up to 35 minutes, unanimous approval of the consent agenda, a detailed presentation of the proposed 2027-2028 biennial budget, and a council motion to schedule a future discussion of a possible Kratom sales ban. No public hearings were held. The next regular meeting was set for October 20, 2026, at 5:30 p.m.

Consent Calendar

  • Resolution 7A authorized a supplemental agreement with HDR Engineering, Inc., not to exceed $549,820, for construction engineering and permitting services for the Nelson Dam Removal Project / Nelson Phase 2 Conveyance Improvements Project IC2010. The agenda described the item as Nelson Phase 2 Conveyance Improvements Project IC2010 (Grant Funding).
  • Resolution 7B authorized the City Manager to accept Change Order 004 with Interwest Construction Inc. in the amount of $1,333,123.03 including sales tax, and approved modifications to contract price and contract time. The agenda listed the project as Nelson Pipeline Phase 2; the clerk referred to it as the Nelson Dam Removal Phase 2 project.
  • The consent agenda was approved by roll call vote, with all present council members voting yes: Brown, Glenn, Gonzalez, Patrickis, and Roy.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • The chair reminded speakers that public comment was limited to 2.5 minutes per speaker, that council members would listen only, and that state law prohibits electioneering at city facilities.
  • Kenton Gartrell, a Yakima city and county resident and property owner, opposed Flock/automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras. He argued they are not the same as Amber Alert systems, do not create safety, and are unaffordable. He asked council to bring a motion to remove Flock cameras, return them to the county, and instead expand Amber Alert/license reader systems. He cited his own experience in Wapato, repair costs of $2,500 to $3,000 per camera, and the use of one-time ARPA money.
  • Natalie Montoya, a city resident speaking via Zoom, expressed disappointment in council members who voted against the mayor's motion to ban Flock cameras and who tabled the ordinance discussion until May 2027. She said the cameras violate rights, cross party lines, and that constituents' concerns must be taken seriously.
  • Sue Finich criticized the council and city manager, saying council members were not honest or courageous and that unelected bureaucrats were usurping responsibilities. Her father, Ralph Holbrook, served on the Yakima City Council in the 1970s. She said she placed an ad in the Yakima Valley Sentinel, with about 20,000 copies going to likely Republican voters, costing roughly $500, and warned that time was running out to fix the situation.
  • Alicia Tobin, executive director of Safe Yakima Valley and a member of the Washington State Substance Abuse and Violence Prevention Board, urged council to pass a local policy prohibiting Kratom sales. She cited Kratom's unregulated status in Washington, the opioid-like compound 70H, national Kratom exposure reports more than doubling from 2024 to 2025, more than one-third of Washington poison-control calls in 2025 being suspected Kratom cases, youth overdoses in Cle Elum and Ellensburg in 2026, local environmental scans showing 1 in 5 mini marts and 82% of vape shops sold Kratom, 88% of vape shops selling Kratom carrying youth-appealing character products, and 14 Washington cities and 3 counties adopting local bans this year.
  • Mark Peterson said he had become the number one TikToker in Yakima with over 100,000 views in three weeks, referenced the Lincoln Day dinner, and asked council members to investigate his case involving City Manager Vicky Baker. He said a council member told him staff warned them not to talk to him, and he compared council members unfavorably to the Good Samaritan, stating City Legal lost the lawsuit but council did nothing.
  • Amanda, a Yakima County resident, criticized Councilwoman Patrickis's prior statement that ALPR opponents were reflexively concerned about rights or using agenda-based claims. She listed reasons for opposition including rights, police misuse, employee misuse, lax data security, and data centers for AI, and called for removing the technology, placing a moratorium, and holding a public hearing or town hall before January.
  • Craig Rust, who lives in the urban growth boundary, raised the proliferation of campaign signs in the city right-of-way. He said they are legal but require permission from abutting property owners, and asked code enforcement to address signs on Yakima Avenue and elsewhere.
  • Tony Corsey described past grievances with the city, including being prevented from speaking and having paperwork hidden. He referenced the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 9/11, Pacific Power and water rights, Steve Hahn, and a $23 million Walmart discrimination verdict, and asked for a response or meeting; he offered to meet after the meeting.

Discussion Items: 2027-2028 Biennial Budget Presentation

  • City Manager Vicky Baker and finance/budget staff member Craig presented a proposed 2027-2028 budget described as balanced, fiscally responsible, and not balanced on reserves. They credited the council and staff for preventing earlier projected deficits and noted other cities, including the Tri-Cities, are facing $11 million to $13 million budget gaps.
  • Historical projections: the city had expected a $6.2 million reserve at the end of 2024, a $2.1 million deficit by the end of 2025, and an $11.4 million deficit by the end of 2026. The 2025 budget gap was projected at $6.8 million, and the 2026 gap at $8.6 million. These outcomes were avoided through cuts and budget work.
  • Voters rejected a $6 million property tax levy in 2025 by 51.32% no to 48.68% yes. The council then made $3 million in reductions plus approximately $6 million in additional cuts, including $3.2 million from police, which eliminated 12 police officer positions, community service officer positions, animal control and parking enforcement support, analyst positions, and humane society funding; $2 million from parks, affecting Harmon Center, Washington Fruit Center, Lions Pool, park bathrooms, and park maintenance; and $1.8 million from fire, including the planned closure of Station 92.
  • For 2026, council used more than $4 million in one-time reserves and donations to restore or extend services, including $225,000 for Harmon Center, $300,000 for Washington Fruit Center, $230,000 for Lions Pool, $50,000 for Franklin Pool repairs plus $120,000 for operations, $141,920 for park bathrooms, $250,000 for indigent defense, $295,000 for technology firewall and server replacements, $250,000 for a snow and ice reserve, and $100,000 for a human resources reserve.
  • Finance staff explained the city's structural revenue limits: property tax growth is capped at 1%, yielding about $230,000 per year. The property tax rate per $1,000 of assessed value fell from $3.50 in 2005 to $1.79 in 2026 as assessed values rose while collections grew by only 1%. For every dollar of property tax paid by city residents, the city keeps about 20 cents, with 62 cents going to schools. On a $100 taxable purchase at the 8.6% sales tax rate, the city general fund receives 85 cents, the state receives $6.50, and Yakima County receives 45 cents. Utility tax revenue increased significantly after electric utility tax collections jumped from $6.3 million to almost $8 million in 2025; the city's electric utility tax rate is 6%.
  • Proposed 2027-2028 includes $100,000 for Washington Fruit Center, with grants and donations needed to fully fund it, $350,000 for Lions Pool, and continued funding for Station 92 through the utility tax. A council member asked staff to communicate to school districts that Lions Pool is proposed to be available for swim teams. Franklin Pool is not included in the proposed budget. Staff cited Franklin Pool's net cost of $92,000 for 90 days of operation, with $109,000 spent, about $16,000 in revenue, 3,273 swimmers, and a net cost per swimmer of $28.21. Washington Fruit Center was open 253 days, with $227,000 in expenses, $32,000 in revenue, a net cost of about $194,000, almost 19,000 attendees, and a net cost per attendee of about $10.25.
  • Structural budget changes include folding the three-tenths of 1% criminal justice sales tax fund into the general fund, moving the community relations fund into the general fund, creating a technology services fund with a five-year replacement cycle for computers and equipment, and eliminating two inactive capital improvement funds. Revenue changes already approved include replacing the $20 car tab with a one-tenth of 1% sales tax for transportation, adding a 3% utility tax for fire, and adding a 1% utility tax for police community services officers and analysts.
  • A $13 million increase in 2026 general fund revenue compared with 2025 is due to an accounting consolidation of property taxes into the general fund, not new revenue. The property tax line rises from $8.4 million in 2025 to $22.3 million in 2026.
  • General fund spending: public safety, consisting of police, fire, and codes, is about 73% of the general fund, nearly $70 million. Adding law and justice brings public safety and law and justice to more than 81% of the general fund. Streets are about 5.9%, or $5.6 million, and parks are about the same. The 2028 budget is similar, with 81.7% for public safety and law and justice.
  • Reserve projections are 16.3% at the end of 2026, 16.1% at the end of 2027, 14.8% at the end of 2028, and 11.31% by 2031 if forecasts hold. Staff recommended raising the reserve policy from 12% to 15%, comparing it to a credit score and citing bond-rating implications. No action was taken on the reserve policy at this meeting.
  • Total city-wide revenues are projected at $321 million for 2027 and $303 million for 2028. Total expenditures are projected at $343,109,585 for 2027 and $317,271,152 for 2028. Grant-funded intergovernmental revenue is the hardest to project.
  • Staff listed unmet needs including police equipment funding of $250,000 versus an estimated need of about $1.4 million, police vehicles at nearly $100,000 each, fire apparatus over $1.3 million for a truck and $2 million or more for a ladder truck, fire station building upgrades, street and sidewalk maintenance cuts over $500,000, and $1.8 million in parks capital needs. Council members discussed economic development, vacant mill site and freeway-frontage property, airport growth, the need for a dedicated economic development position, and the need to press the state legislature on unfunded mandates.
  • Budget schedule: public hearings are set for November 10 and November 17, 2026, with possible adoption on December 8, 2026.

Council Open Discussion and City Manager Update

  • Council discussion included a council member's anecdote about a tenant asking why other residents receive paid assistants; another council member said he would bring economic development items to council soon. City Manager Vicky Baker gave no formal update, saying the budget was the main topic and that a meeting is scheduled the following week.

Other Business

  • Councilwoman Byers made a motion, seconded by Councilwoman Patrickis, for the council to have information and discussion at a near-term council meeting and consider banning the sale of Kratom in city limits. Council discussion noted enforcement concerns and a preference for focusing on meth and illegal drugs, but the motion passed by voice vote. It does not itself ban Kratom; it schedules further consideration.

Key Outcomes

  • Consent agenda adopted unanimously by roll call vote, 5 yes.
  • No formal action was taken on the 2027-2028 budget; the presentation was informational. Budget hearings are set for November 10 and November 17, 2026, with adoption targeted for December 8, 2026.
  • Council passed the motion to schedule a future discussion and consideration of a Kratom sales ban.
  • Meeting adjourned to the next regular council meeting on October 20, 2026, at 5:30 p.m. in City Hall Council Chambers.

Meeting Transcript

I will call this council regular business meeting to order. Uh clerk, uh, roll call, please. Here. Brown? Here. Present. Glenn. Present. Gonzalez. Patrick is here. Roy? Here. All right. I pledge allegiance to the five. And to the Republic or we should stand one nation under God. Indivisible at Liberty Just Rolling. He's still for the subject. Thank you. Next we have nothing in the good of the order. We will go to public comment. So if you plan to provide public comment tonight, please if you haven't already, fill out a request form in the lobby and provide to the city clerk. Public comment will last up to 35 minutes. Each speaker will have two and a half minutes to provide public comment. During public comment, speakers cannot campaign for or against candidates or support or oppose a ballot measure. State law prohibits threatening or otherwise intimidating council members or staff. During public comment, council members will listen only. Council members and staff will not address litigation during public comment. Audience members should not clap, wave signs, or otherwise distract the meeting. We appreciate uh you guys being here tonight. All right. First up in public comment is uh Kenton Gartrell Hi, Kevin Gartrell. Most of you know me, uh City of Yacimo resident and county. I actually own properties in both. Um I'm here to talk to you tonight about item twelve, which is other business, because I am hoping that for procedural reasons and not having to deal with another uh fest in May or March or whatever day you tabled it to, is that I would like the city council to separate understand that Amber Alert Systems are not the same as flock systems, and that polling-wise both conservatives, principled conservatives, and libertarians, and most of the Liberal Democrat Party are against Flock cameras. I would like the council members, uh Ridy Berg and Juliet, sorry I can't pronounce your last name. Uh Juliet to bring back a motion which would follow procedures to ban just flock by authorizing the city manager to direct staff to have them removed and given back to the county in an ordinance formulated for this council to then be capable of voting on that meets its needs. All of you have an email. I did also file a motion into your email that does fit the charter and does actually expand on Amber Alert systems. So if you want to create more safety and have those cameras that actually do create safety by data purposes that does exist, the amber alert systems would still be placed up. A

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com