Public Meetings - Nampa, Idaho

The Nampa City Council met on September 15, 2025, at 7:00 PM (local time) to address a full agenda including the future of the Ford Idaho Center, a major subdivision proposal, and several routine fiscal actions. The meeting opened with a prayer and pledge, followed by recognition of retiring staff members. Council debated the Ford Idaho Center’s underutilization, set a minimum sale price of $75 million, and voted to hold a public hearing on October 6, 2025. A controversial Lakeview subdivision was continued to November 3, 2025, after the council failed to approve the proposed modifications. Multiple consent items and financing resolutions were approved unanimously. Consent Calendar - Approved consent agenda as amended, including routine approvals and financial items. - Item 1.6A: Reappointment of Dale to the Nampa Development Corporation, approved 6–0 after discussion about the selection process. Public Comments & Testimony - David Gerston (11929 West Calais Drive, Nampa) attempted to speak on the Lloyd Square public hearing (Item 8.1) during public forum but was redirected to the proper public hearing date. The council clarified that written comments would be included in the packet. - Lakeview Subdivision (Item 8.2): - Jill Hallows (603 West Crimson Loop, Nampa) opposed the development, citing premature timing before the Canyon County area of impact decision, insufficient infrastructure, and negative impacts on wildlife near Lake Lowell. She requested lower density and removal of lots 14–16 adjacent to the green area. - Cheryl Higley (12441 South Abbott Valley Way, Nampa) stated she could not support the project because the developer did not honor her suggestion to remove three houses from the green space. She also argued that residential growth does not pay for itself and asked for denial. - Carol Gammel (12606 Memory Lane, Nampa) expressed frustration with increased traffic on Iowa Avenue, loss of wildlife, and distrust of developers based on past experiences. She questioned whether the promised 150-foot buffer would be maintained. - Susan Weaver (3653 South Pemmet Avenue, Boise) spoke on behalf of the property owners (Karen and Bob Anderson), noting that continued farming was no longer viable due to surrounding development and that the proposed residential transition was a responsible next step. Discussion Items - Ford Idaho Center (Item 5.7 & 5.8): - Procurement Director Rick Kennedy reported that only a few appraisers expressed interest in an independent appraisal, with no formal proposals. Council voted 5–1 to cease seeking a formal appraisal. - City Attorney Preston Rutter presented a resolution to declare the Ford Idaho Center underutilized/not used for a public purpose, allowing three options: sell to highest bidder, convey to College of Western Idaho (CWI), or retain. After extensive debate, council passed the resolution 4–2 and set a minimum sale price of $75 million (motion carried 4–2). A public hearing is scheduled for October 6, 2025. - Lakeview Subdivision (Item 8.2): - The applicant (Heath Clark) presented a revised plan with 130 lots, 25% open space, and a 150-foot buffer. Staff recommended approval. Public testimony was largely opposed. - Council discussed modifying the plat to remove two lots (Lot 1, Block 5 and one additional lot) to relocate the sports court to a more central location. The applicant agreed to this reduction. - A motion to approve with those modifications failed (3–3? The record shows a split vote; the motion failed). Subsequently, a motion to continue the public hearing to November 3, 2025, passed (5–2) to allow further discussion, including clarifying the impact of sales tax revenue and addressing concerns about the gravel pit buffer. - Animal Code Amendments (Item 5.6): First reading of amendments to Title 6 (cruelty, animals at large, impoundment) passed under suspension of rules. Key Outcomes - Approved unanimously: - Fleet services building contract with Favor Construction ($5 million) (Item 5.1). - Vehicle purchase orders for FY26 ($3.587 million) (Item 5.2). - Task order amendment for water renewal facility ($84,557) (Item 5.3). - Contract with Maclave Civil Constructors for pipeline ($710,300) (Item 5.4). - Change order 3 for waterline replacement ($216,535) (Item 5.5). - Financing resolution for wastewater system improvements ($16.5 million note at 1.68% interest) (Item 5.9). - Comprehensive plan text amendment incorporating fire district impact fees (Item 9.1). - Annexation and zoning to IL (76 North Happy Valley Road) (Item 9.2). - Annexation and zoning to RS6 for Swainson's Hawk Arbor subdivision (Item 9.3). - Ford Idaho Center: Ceased appraisal process; passed underutilization resolution; set minimum sale price at $75 million; public hearing on October 6, 2025. - Lakeview Subdivision: Public hearing continued to November 3, 2025, with applicant willing to reduce two lots and relocate sports court. - Proclamations: Hispanic Heritage Month (Sept 15–Oct 15, 2025) and Constitution Week (Sept 17–23, 2025) were proclaimed. - Executive session: Approved to discuss legal matters (Idaho Code 74-206(1)(c) and (j)).

The Nampa Planning and Zoning Commission met on September 9, 2025, at 6:00 PM. Roll call was taken with eight commissioners present. The agenda included two public hearings: a pre-annexation and development agreement for New Life Landscape (Carlos Torres) and an annexation, zoning, and preliminary plat for Breckenwood Subdivision. A staff report on the comprehensive plan update was also provided. Both items were approved with amendments. Consent Calendar - The consent agenda was approved by unanimous voice vote (motion by Garner, second by Daper). Public Comments & Testimony - Item 3-1 (New Life Landscape): Kim Marshall (11101 Greenhurst Rd) spoke in support of Carlos Torres, describing him as an exceptional landscaper and a Nampa native. Steve Kider (6407 Airport Rd) requested a six-foot solid fence along the east property line to reduce sound and dust. - Item 3-2 (Breckenwood Subdivision): Victor Dowdy (6182 E Mayfield Dr) expressed support for the project contingent on extending Landry Street to 11th Avenue North before or during early phases, citing safety concerns at the Canada/Landry intersection. He also requested an updated traffic study. Barbara Davis (6473 E Path Dr) raised concerns about traffic safety, lack of a pool in the subdivision (fearing residents would use existing HOA pool), stretched city services (fire, police, irrigation), and school capacity. Another resident (name not stated) voiced fatigue over rapid growth and construction impacts. Discussion Items - Comprehensive Plan Update: Staff reported 10 community outreach events in the past two weeks and over 300 survey responses. A consultant has begun existing conditions analysis. A joint planning session with city council was held on September 30, 2025, and a form-based code session is scheduled for September 18, 2025. - Item 3-1: New Life Landscape – Pre-Annexation & Development Agreement: The applicant Carlos Torres requested pre-annexation to BC (Community Business) zoning for a landscape construction business at 246 N Robinson Rd. The property is in the city's impact area and designated Community Mixed Use on the comp plan. Staff (Rodney Ashby) explained the pre-annexation process and presented two motion options: approval with conditions or denial. Key discussion points included fencing requirements (design-review fence per city code vs. vinyl fence requested by neighbor), whether sidewalks and other improvements should be required at annexation or immediately, and the need for a concept plan. Commissioners expressed support for the business but debated timing of code compliance. A neighbor's request for a fence was acknowledged. - Item 3-2: Breckenwood Subdivision – Annexation, Zoning & Preliminary Plat: The applicant (Becky Isigari, representing Todd Campbell Custom Homes) proposed annexing 81.78 acres for a mixed-use development: 352 residential lots (68 twin homes, 284 single-family detached) and 4 commercial lots. Zoning requested: RS4, RD, BC. Seven phases over 7 years. Staff analysis confirmed consistency with comp plan (Residential Mixed Use), density (4.52 du/ac), and open space (15.7% of total). Concerns from public and commissioners focused on traffic, left-turn lane at Canada and Landry, and the need to extend Landry to 11th Avenue. Commissioners discussed requiring a northbound left-turn lane on Canada at Landry. Key Outcomes - Item 3-1 Approved (unanimous voice vote): New Life Landscape pre-annexation to BC zone and development agreement approved with all proposed conditions, except condition G regarding sidewalks and side paths was amended to state that improvements shall be completed within 12 months of annexation rather than at time of development. Motion by Morgan, second by Garner. - Item 3-2 Approved (unanimous voice vote): Breckenwood Subdivision annexation, zoning, and preliminary plat approved with an additional condition requiring installation of a northbound left-turn lane on Canada Road at Landry Street. Motion by (unclear) with second by (unclear). - The meeting adjourned following the vote. Note: The meeting took place on 2025-09-09, as confirmed by the roll call at 6:00 PM.

The Nampa City Council met on Tuesday, September 2, 2025, at 7:00 PM. The meeting began with prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, followed by roll call. Council discussed proposed amendments to the agenda, debated several items related to the future of the Ford Idaho Center, heard public testimony on a zoning rezone for a restaurant, and approved the FY25 third budget amendment after a brief executive session. Consent Calendar - Item 1 for M: Removed from the consent agenda (cooperative agreement with ITD) indefinitely. - Items 5-6 and 5-7: A motion to postpone these two items (authorizing the city attorney to draft a declaration of intent to convey/sell the Ford Idaho Center and authorizing a non-binding solicitation of interest) to the September 15, 2025 meeting failed (roll call votes: 3-4 and 3-4). The council then proceeded to consider the items as new business. - Item 13A: Authorization to proceed with a public hearing for an upcoming application was approved unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Alan Clemens (5414 Cherry Lane) expressed concern about potential street access through his property for a neighboring church development. He referenced a prior council meeting where Councilman Haverfield allegedly suggested routing a street through his land. The mayor directed him to staff for follow-up. - David Taney apologized for his previous conduct at council meetings, specifically regarding the Ford Idaho Center debate. He suggested forming an ad hoc committee of local experts to evaluate options. - Patricia Warren (1216 13th Street South) and her daughter Andrea Adamson (824 Fifth Avenue North) opposed the proposed restaurant rezone at 1215 13th Street South, citing increased traffic, noise, dust, and parking issues. They argued the project was incompatible with the residential neighborhood. - Brenda Rodriguez (applicant, 916 South Power Line Road) defended the project, noting that the property currently attracts trash and needles and that a restaurant would improve safety. - Mark Mitchell (1235 Landown) questioned the design's setback and traffic flow, stating the location was not suitable for a restaurant. Discussion Items - Ford Idaho Center – Items 5-6, 5-7, 5-8: Council debated three interrelated items: - 5-6 (Authorize city attorney to draft declaration of intent to convey or sell): Supporters argued this was necessary to gather information; opponents said it predetermined a sale and lacked data on underutilization. The motion passed 4-3 (Mayor Kling broke the tie) after a failed attempt to postpone. - 5-7 (Non-binding solicitation of interest): The mayor explained this would gauge market interest at no cost. Councilman Haverfield opposed, citing the need for an appraisal first. The motion passed 5-1. - 5-8 (Appraisal for Ford Idaho Center): Councilman Haverfield proposed an independent appraisal, but after discussion, the motion was amended to authorize staff to solicit bids for an appraisal and bring them back to council. This passed 4-2. - Restaurant Rezone (Item 8-1) – 1215 13th Street South: The applicant (Aaron Randall, JGT Architecture) presented a revised plan eliminating a rear drive aisle and adding landscaping. Council members questioned traffic, parking, and compatibility with adjacent residences. After public hearing and discussion, the motion to approve failed 3-3 (Mayor Kling voted no, citing inconsistency with past decisions on setbacks). The rezone was denied. - FY25 Third Budget Amendment (Item 8-2): Finance Director Doug Racine presented a $15,805,844 amendment. Initial confusion arose because the packet only contained the resolution without detailed schedules. After a brief executive session to resolve the discrepancy, the council approved the amendment unanimously (7-0) and passed the accompanying ordinance under suspension of rules. - Street Naming (Item 5-5): Ordinance naming a new street “East Barnes Street” in honor of retiring Water Resources Director Jeff Barnes was approved unanimously. Key Outcomes - Ford Idaho Center – Declaration of Intent (5-6): Approved 4-3 (Mayor Kling broke tie). Legal counsel authorized to draft the declaration. - Ford Idaho Center – Non-binding Solicitation of Interest (5-7): Approved 5-1. Procurement to publish notice seeking potential buyers. - Ford Idaho Center – Appraisal (5-8): Approved 4-2. Staff to solicit bids for an independent appraisal and report back to council. - Restaurant Rezone (8-1): Denied 3-3 (Mayor Kling voted no). The application for a zoning map amendment to allow a restaurant at 1215 13th Street South was not approved. - FY25 Third Budget Amendment (8-2): Approved unanimously. Total budget increased to $323,228,785. The amendment includes $10,500 from general government (Family Justice Center), $9.9 million from department funds/grants, and $5.4 million in capital projects. - Street Naming (5-5): Approved unanimously. New street to be named East Barnes Street. - Proclamation: Recognized September 2025 as National Recovery Month. Speakers from the Southwest Idaho Recovery Community Center highlighted their services. - Staff Updates: John Spencer introduced as new Water Resources Director. Planning & Zoning reported approval of a data center conditional use permit, a Tractor Supply outdoor display permit, and a development agreement modification for Greenhurst Crossing.

The Nampa Planning and Zoning Commission met on August 26, 2025, at 6:00 PM. The meeting included a consent calendar and three public hearings: a conditional use permit for a data center, a conditional use permit for outdoor display at a Tractor Supply store, and a zoning map amendment and development agreement modification for a mixed-use development. All items were approved unanimously. Consent Calendar - The consent agenda included approval of the annexation and zoning for Brentwood Village (at the corner of Eustach Road and North Franklin Boulevard) and a development agreement change to allow parking in front and a drive-thru in the back. The commission had previously recommended approval, and the City Council had approved these items. The consent agenda was approved by motion (Kehoe, Dapper) with all in favor. Public Comments & Testimony - Data Center (8300 Birch Lane): After the public hearing was opened, Morgan Treasure, Assistant Director of Economic Development, spoke in support of the project, noting it is a single-user data center going into an existing building, bringing beneficial utility programming and an additional 8 MW of power to the site. No other public comments were received. - Tractor Supply (216 Caldwell Boulevard): No public comments were received. - Sunny Acre Partners (2321 Sunny Ridge / 617 Greenhurst): No public comments were received. Discussion Items - Conditional Use Permit for Data Center (8300 Birch Lane): Josh Leonard (Clark Wardle LLP) representing T5 Data Centers LLC proposed a networking data center in an existing building within an industrial park. The facility will be built out in five phases, with 5 MW capacity (5% of typical data centers) and a closed-loop cooling system using minimal water (no evaporation, water use comparable to 1-2 homes). The site will have 24/7 security and approximately 11 employees. The applicant addressed concerns about power and water usage, noting the small scale. Staff (Rodney Ashby) recommended approval, noting compliance with the comprehensive plan and no adverse impacts. The commission discussed security staffing and tax assessment implications. The public hearing was closed, and a motion to approve with recommended conditions passed unanimously. - Conditional Use Permit for Tractor Supply Outdoor Display (216 Caldwell Boulevard): James Boglioli (in-house counsel for the owner) proposed reusing the former Office Depot building for a Tractor Supply store, including outdoor display areas (live goods, fenced areas, trailer display) totaling 54 parking spaces. The site provides 106 parking spaces, exceeding the required 90. Staff (Damian Snodgrass) recommended approval, noting compatibility with the commercial area and adequate parking. The commission asked about prior use and signage. No public comments. The public hearing was closed, and a motion to approve with recommended conditions passed unanimously. - Zoning Map Amendment and Development Agreement Modification (Sunny Acre Partners): Larry Lasure (White Laser Development) requested a rezone from BN to BC for a 3.46-acre portion of a mixed-use development to allow a drive-through coffee shop and a convenience store with gas. The original approval in May 2025 included BN and RMH zoning. The applicant stated that the BN zone does not permit drive-throughs or gas sales, prompting the request. Staff (Christney Watkins) determined the change is substantial but recommended approval with conditions, including frontage improvements, sidewalk installation, and roadway striping modifications. The commission discussed the lack of gas stations in the area, design review requirements, and landscaping. The applicant noted neighborhood meetings and commitment to landscaping. The public hearing was closed, and a motion to approve with recommended conditions passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - Data Center CUP: Approved unanimously (motion by Morgan, second by Kehoe). The CUP becomes effective 15 calendar days after the written decision is provided, pending no appeal. - Tractor Supply CUP: Approved unanimously (motion by Dapper, second by Selman). Same effective period. - Sunny Acre Partners Rezone and Development Agreement Modification: Approved unanimously (motion by Dapper, second by Morgan). The rezone and modified development agreement are subject to the appeal period and conditions including future alignment of parcel boundaries. - Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned by motion (Selman, Dapper) with all in favor.

On August 26, 2025, the Nampa City Council held a workshop meeting to discuss the potential sale of the Fort Idaho Center (Idaho Center). The meeting resumed after an executive session at 8:23 PM. Council members and the city attorney debated the process, deed restrictions, and risks of selling the facility to the highest bidder. No formal votes were taken, but the council reached a consensus to begin the statutory process for selling the property. Discussion Items - Valuation and Sale Price: Council members debated the property's value. One member cited a 2017 ICRIF report valuing it at $100 million, while another noted the Jacobs report estimated replacement value of the four buildings alone at $150 million. The attorney clarified that true market value is determined by a willing buyer and seller, and an appraisal is not required. A member suggested a minimum bid of $100 million, while another mentioned a potential offer of $20 million from an unnamed party. The council agreed to let the market set the price through a public auction. - Deed Restrictions: The council discussed placing deed restrictions on the property to ensure continued use for the Snake River Stampede Rodeo, horse park, graduations, gun shows, and other community events. The term sheet previously negotiated with the College of Western Idaho (CWI) was suggested as a basis, except for soccer fields that were specific to CWI. The attorney noted that carefully crafted deed restrictions could include reversion clauses if terms are violated, giving the city some control over future use. - Concerns About Buyer Qualification: Several members expressed concern about selling to an outside entity (e.g., a George Soros group) that might use the facility for political events while only minimally complying with deed restrictions. The attorney explained that the city cannot qualify buyers but can impose deed restrictions that limit use. A member suggested requiring bidders to submit proposals in advance to allow the city to vet their vision and financial wherewithal, though the attorney noted the statute requires sale to the highest bidder. - Underutilization Determination: The city attorney advised that before selling, the council must formally declare the property underutilized. This step is required by Idaho law and a U.S. District Court case. The council agreed to vote on an underutilization declaration at the September 2, 2025, meeting. A public hearing on the sale would then be held in October 2025, after the required 14-day notice period. - CWI Conveyance: The council discussed whether to continue negotiations with CWI, which had invested significant time and expense. The mayor indicated he would call CWI to inform them the city is pursuing a different path. Some members noted that CWI could still participate in the public auction. - Timeline: The council aimed to vote on underutilization on September 2, 2025. The public hearing to authorize the sale would be on October 7 or 8, 2025, with deed restrictions attached as an exhibit. The sale itself would occur at a public auction to the highest bidder, with a minimum bid set by the council. Key Outcomes - The council reached a consensus to proceed with the statutory process for selling the Idaho Center, starting with a formal underutilization vote on September 2, 2025. - The city attorney will draft deed restrictions based on the CWI term sheet, excluding soccer fields, and present them for council review before the October public hearing. - The council will set a minimum bid amount (likely $100 million) and identify additional deed restrictions to protect community events. - The mayor will communicate to CWI that the city is shifting from a direct conveyance to a public sale process. - No formal votes were taken; the meeting was a workshop. The council will take action on September 2, 2025.

Nampa City Council Special Workshop on Fort Idaho Center Future - August 25, 2025\n\nThe Nampa City Council held a special workshop on August 25, 2025, to discuss the future of the Fort Idaho Center (FIC). The meeting was a discussion-only session with no public testimony or hearings. Council members reviewed financials, considered options including conveyance to College of Western Idaho (CWI), leasing, selling, or public-private partnerships, and assessed legal risks. No formal votes were taken, but several action items and directions emerged.\n\n Discussion Items\n- Financial Review of Fort Idaho Center: Doug, the city's financial consultant, presented historical financial data. The city has subsidized the FIC with approximately $22 million over 20 years ($14 million in operations and $9 million in capital). In FY24, the city provided $1.6 million in operating support. The FIC has never been profitable, though losses have decreased in recent years. Councilman Bills questioned the return on investment for the $1.5 million horse park RV expansion, which had an estimated 8-year payback period.\n- CWI's Financial Capacity: Councilman Reynolds raised concerns about CWI's ability to assume the asset, citing an independent audit report that noted errors in capital asset valuation and a “going concern” comment. Councilman Bills and Councilman Reynolds requested that Doug review CWI's financial statements and assess the impact of Governor Little's 3% budget holdback for state agencies. The mayor agreed this due diligence was needed.\n- Conveyance Terms and Risks: The council discussed the proposed conveyance agreement with CWI. Key points included a 10-year soccer field usage agreement valued at approximately $3.5 million in maintenance savings, CWI's stated intention to build a recreation center (though not legally committed), and the facility's $28 million deferred maintenance backlog. Attorney Preston clarified that a sale with deed restrictions is legally possible, countering earlier misconceptions.\n- Lease vs. Sale vs. Conveyance: Preston explained legal frameworks: for a sale, the property must go to the highest bidder at public auction; a lease requires a finding that the property is not needed for city purposes and terms must be “just and equitable.” Councilman Griffin expressed opposition to cities owning entertainment venues. Councilman Haverfield questioned whether alternative models (e.g., enterprise zones, urban renewal) were viable. The mayor noted that attempts to develop FIC property commercially had failed due to market conditions.\n- Legal Exposure and Lawsuit Risk: In response to inquiries, Preston outlined that abuse of discretion claims could arise from perceived favoritism or bias. He noted that ICRIMP coverage for such lawsuits is determined case-by-case, and that individual council members could potentially be named. The act of selling might reduce litigation risk compared to a conveyance to CWI. Council members expressed frustration that their efforts to find a sustainable solution had been met with accusations.\n- Utilization and Revenue Options: Andrew, the FIC director, answered questions about ticket pricing (the city does not set prices), facility fees (currently $2/ticket, potentially increased to $4), and the complexity of adding events like ice skating or equine events (cost prohibitive). He noted the facility had 262 event days in the last year, with 72% utilization. Councilman Rodriguez asked about OVG's $10 million amphitheater investment proposal; Andrew confirmed the numbers were preliminary.\n\n Key Outcomes\n- Due Diligence Directed: Council directed Doug to review CWI's audited financial statements and evaluate the college’s ability to sustain the facility, including the impact of the state budget holdback. Results are to be brought back for further discussion.\n- No Consensus on Path Forward: Council members expressed a range of positions: some favored conveyance to CWI, others preferred selling with deed restrictions, while a few advocated for pausing and exploring revised agreements with Oak View Group (OVG) or other public-private partnerships.\n- Next Steps: The meeting adjourned into executive session (Idaho Code 74-206(1)(f)) to discuss legal risks. No further public action was scheduled.\n- No Formal Votes: All decisions remain pending further analysis and risk assessment.

This morning workshop brought together the Nampa Planning and Zoning Commission, the Nampa Development Corporation (NDC), and the consultant team (led by Nathan Davis) to discuss the proposed form-based code for downtown Nampa. The session included a 45-minute presentation covering the purpose, structure, and implementation of form-based code, followed by discussion and feedback from commissioners and council members. Discussion Items - Presentation of Form-Based Code: Nathan Davis explained that form-based code prioritizes building form (height, setbacks, stepbacks, frontage types) over land use. It aims to create a cohesive, vibrant downtown by regulating physical design rather than solely use. Five form districts were proposed: Central Historic (CH), Central Downtown (CD), Central 11th Avenue (C11), Central 16th Avenue (C16), and Central Residential (CR), each with specific height ranges and design intents. - Central Historic District Boundaries: A significant discussion centered on whether to extend the CH district to include properties on the west side of 12th Avenue between Front and First (or Second) streets. Councilman Haverfield and Mayor argued that the corridor facing the historic train depot should have consistent historic standards to protect the visual corridor and avoid confusion. Staff noted that the train depot is in the railroad right-of-way and unlikely to be redeveloped, but the Mayor stressed that leaving parcels outside the district could create loopholes. After debate, consensus emerged to extend the CH district to the west side of 12th Avenue from Front to First Street, with a suggestion to also consider half-block extensions so street sides match. - Architectural Styles and Flexibility: Councilman Haverfield asked for a defined architectural style guide (like Eagle’s nine styles) to provide clear expectations for developers and prevent subjective decisions. Consultant Nathan Davis indicated that architectural styles are already in the draft but can be refined. Matthew Garner cautioned against over-specifying styles, noting that diverse architecture makes cities interesting and that form-based code should allow flexibility while setting clear parameters. - Stepbacks and Height Limits: Concerns were raised about preserving the visual corridor along 12th Avenue. Councilman Haverfield advocated for stepbacks (e.g., two stories on the street front, then step back before going higher) to avoid a wall of tall buildings that would obscure the train depot view. The consultant agreed to incorporate stepback requirements along 12th Avenue in the CH district, with a maximum height of four stories and stepbacks starting after two stories. - Timeline and Next Steps: Adopted a fast-track timeline: final draft due October 1, legal review in early October, steering committee meeting in September, and adoption by City Council on December 1. A follow-up joint workshop (Planning and Zoning, NDC, and Council) was tentatively scheduled for the September 18 city council workshop to review the full draft code. The form-based code will replace the existing Chapter 15 downtown code, including design guidelines and land use regulations. - Developer Feedback: Economic Development staff noted that developers are generally positive about form-based code because it reduces ambiguity and risk, allowing them to plan budgets and projects from the outset. Key Outcomes - Direction to Extend Central Historic District: The consultant will adjust the CH district boundary to include the west side of 12th Avenue between Front and First streets (with potential half-block harmonization) to ensure consistent historic standards across the corridor. - Incorporate Stepback Requirements: Stepback provisions will be added along 12th Avenue in the CH district, with a two-story street wall and stepback before reaching the maximum four-story height. - Additional Joint Meeting Scheduled: A follow-up workshop will be held on September 18, 2025, to allow commissioners and council to review the draft code in detail before finalization. - Adoption Timeline: City Council adoption targeted for December 1, 2025, with reviews by Arts and Historic Preservation Commission (October 13), Design Review Committee (October 20), and Planning and Zoning Commission (November 12). - Feedback Collection: Commissioners were asked to submit feedback on the materials by August 28, 2025 (one week from the meeting date).

The Nampa City Council met on August 18, 2025, to discuss and act on several key items, including a proposed levy override for the Ford Idaho Center, the FY26 budget, and various land use matters. The meeting opened with a prayer and pledge, followed by a presentation recognizing Lindsay Dunbar for completing an apprenticeship program. The main discussion centered on whether to place a levy override on the November ballot to address deferred maintenance and budget shortfalls at the Ford Idaho Center. After extensive debate, the council voted unanimously to deny the levy override. The council also approved the FY26 budget and a foregone property tax increase, albeit with opposition. Additionally, the council approved the annexation and zoning of the Brentwood Village development, a new fee for passport photo services, and a development agreement modification for the Home Base project. Consent Calendar - Agenda approved as presented. - Consent agenda approved. Public Comments & Testimony - Manuel Herrera (18357 Tree Line Ave, Nampa) spoke in support of Valley Regional Transit (VRT) funding, emphasizing its importance for workers, students, and seniors. He urged the council to prioritize VRT in the 2026 budget. - Jill Hallows (603 West Crimson Move, Nampa) expressed frustration that the auditorium district was not offsetting Ford Idaho Center expenses and felt the levy discussion felt like an ultimatum. She urged the council to explore other solutions before considering a tax increase. - Patricia Evans (3616 East Rolling Green Place, Nampa) criticized the Jacobs report as overinflated and suggested focusing on essential maintenance instead of a full renovation. She proposed using facility fees on tickets and amending the auditorium district, and urged the council not to convey the Ford Idaho Center. - Kelly Chapman (116 Marvin, Caldwell) spoke in favor of VRT on-demand services and suggested a commuter train with a stop at the Ford Idaho Center to alleviate parking issues. Discussion Items - Levy Override Options for Ford Idaho Center: Legal counsel Preston presented an overview of levy override mechanisms, including temporary (2-year) and permanent options, with voting thresholds based on the levy rate. The council discussed the need to fund deferred maintenance at the Ford Idaho Center, which has an estimated $15-20 million deficit. Council members expressed concerns about tax burden on residents, especially given the recent failure of a transportation bond. Councilman Reynolds moved to deny placing a levy override on the ballot, citing insufficient funding for meaningful impact and the need for a more sustainable solution. The motion passed unanimously. - FY26 Budget and Foregone Property Tax: CFO Doug Racine presented the FY26 budget, totaling $310 million, a 0.9% increase over the prior year. The budget includes a 1% foregone property tax increase of $468,023 to fund three new police officers, council salary increases, and other operational costs. The net tax impact on residents is nearly zero due to the expiration of the previous year's 3% capital foregone. The council approved the foregone resolution (5-1, with Haverfield and Griffin opposed) and the FY26 budget (5-1, with Griffin opposed). - Annexation and Zoning (Brentwood Village): The council considered the annexation of 6 acres at 7799 Ustick Road into BC, RS4, and IL zoning to allow 24 single-family lots, commercial space, and a cell tower. The applicant proposed a quad-style design similar to Riverstone in Eagle. After public hearing, the council approved the annexation and zoning (5-1, with Griffin opposed). - Passport Photo Fee: City Clerk Shar Tim proposed a new $25 fee for passport photo services to provide convenience for residents. The fee is intended to cover equipment and supplies without competing with local businesses. The council approved the fee unanimously. - Development Agreement Modification (Home Base): Victor Farrell requested modification of a 2007 development agreement to allow more flexible parking layout and remove certain landscaping requirements for a multi-tenant building at 4865 E. Franklin Road. The modification was approved unanimously. Key Outcomes - Levy Override Denied: The council voted unanimously to deny putting a levy override on the November ballot to fund Ford Idaho Center deferred maintenance. (Motion by Reynolds, seconded; all in favor). - Foregone Property Tax Increase Approved: The council approved a resolution authorizing a 1% foregone property tax increase of $468,023 for FY26 operations, primarily for police. The vote was 5-1, with Councilmembers Haverfield and Griffin opposed. (Note: The transcript indicates the mayor stated two opposed, but the roll call shows Griffin and Haverfield as nos.) - FY26 Budget Approved: The council approved the FY26 budget of $310 million. The vote was 5-1, with Councilmember Griffin opposed. - Annexation of Brentwood Village Approved: The council approved annexation and zoning of approximately 6 acres into BC, RS4, and IL zoning for a 24-lot single-family development with commercial and cell tower. The vote was 5-1, with Councilmember Griffin opposed. - Passport Photo Fee Approved: The council approved a new $25 fee for passport photo services, effective immediately. - Development Agreement Modification Approved: The council approved modifications to the Home Base development agreement to allow revised parking and landscaping standards. - Public Hearing Continued: The public hearing for item 8.4 was continued to September 15, 2025. - Unfinished Business: The council approved two ordinances: a vacation of a utility easement and a zoning map amendment from RD to RS6, both under suspension of rules. - Executive Session: The council adjourned into executive session to discuss acquiring an interest in rural property.

The Nampa Planning & Zoning Commission met on August 12, 2025, with eight members present. The meeting included a report on recent city council actions, a welcome to new commission member Meredith Copeland, and two public hearing items: a conditional use permit for a reduced rear yard setback and a revised preliminary plat for the Magnolia States subdivision. Public testimony was heard on the second item, and both items were approved unanimously. Consent Calendar - The commission approved the consent agenda by a voice vote (all in favor, none opposed). No specific items were listed. Public Comments & Testimony - Magnolia States Preliminary Plat: John Chapman (1770 North Side Boulevard) spoke in opposition, citing inadequate road infrastructure on North Side Boulevard, high density, and safety concerns from industrial traffic. He requested postponement until intersection improvements (Ustick and North Side) are completed. He noted that the original plat density was already too high and the applicant repeatedly requests density increases. - Applicant Kent Brown responded, stating that the revised plat reduces density by one single-family lot (from 46 to 45) and adds workforce housing near industrial areas, which aligns with city planning. He also mentioned that traffic studies were not required because the project fell below the threshold for a Traffic Impact Study. Discussion Items - Conditional Use Permit (CUP) – 523 Sunny Lane (Michael Underwood): The applicant requested a reduction in the rear yard setback from 15 feet to 5 feet on a single lot in the RS6 zone, to facilitate a lot split and create a more uniform layout for infill development. Staff confirmed the proposal meets comprehensive plan goals for infill and complies with code 10-8-5.a.4. Discussion included whether a variance would be more appropriate and the potential permanence of a CUP. The commission approved the CUP with conditions (compliance with all city codes, no encroachment on public easements, required legal descriptions for utilities/access, and a property boundary adjustment application). - Revised Preliminary Plat – Magnolia States (Kent Brown, representing Sean Brownley/Trilogy Idaho): The applicant sought approval for a revised preliminary plat that added an adjacent parcel, increased the number of fourplex lots from 14 to 15 (adding 11 units total), and converted one buildable lot into common open space. Total units became 73 (45 single-family lots, 15 fourplex lots, and 14 common lots). Staff noted that the original plat had already been built out (all lots with building permits), and the revised plat complies with zoning and subdivision standards. Public testimony raised traffic concerns; staff clarified that intersection improvements at Ustick and North Side are funded for 2029-2030. The commission approved the revised preliminary plat with conditions and findings as presented, amended to reflect the change to 45 single-family lots and 15 fourplexes. Key Outcomes - Approved: Conditional Use Permit for 523 Sunny Lane (motion by Commissioner Kirkman, second by Commissioner Keyhoe; voice vote: all in favor, none opposed). - Approved: Revised Preliminary Plat for Magnolia States (motion by Commissioner Kirkman, second by Commissioner Garner; voice vote: all in favor, none opposed). - Withdrawn: The item from June 24 regarding a group home was withdrawn by the applicant before the meeting. - Council Actions Update: The commission received a report on three items approved by city council on August 4, 2025: a zoning map amendment (RA to RD) near South Garland Street and Sunny Ridge Road; annexation, zoning, and preliminary plat for Millwood Pines (56 single-family lots); and a zoning map amendment and conditional use permit for a contractor's landscape office off Happy Valley Road.