Public Meetings - Nampa, Idaho

The Nampa City Council held a workshop on September 17, 2026, starting at approximately 8:00 AM. The meeting opened with an invocation and the Pledge of Allegiance. Two primary discussion items were addressed: a proposed update to the mobile food vendor licensing code and an analysis of the impact of state legislation (House Bills 389 and 673) on property tax collections. No votes were taken; the council provided direction for future action. Discussion Items - Mobile Food Vendor License Update: Senior Director of Development Services Mark Sawyer presented a proposed new code to replace existing temporary use permit and peddler's license requirements with a one-stop mobile food vendor license. The code would restrict vendors to commercial/industrial zones, require the lot to have a structure with a certificate of occupancy, prohibit overnight parking, and ban canopies, tables, chairs, umbrellas, and ground cover within 300 feet of the vehicle to prevent them from resembling outdoor eateries. Operating hours would be 9 AM to 11 PM. Vendors on public rights-of-way would need a separate license with additional insurance. The code includes discretion for staff to allow minor items like a single umbrella. Council members expressed differing views: Councilman Griffin opposed adding restrictions and argued for scaling back existing code, especially on private property, noting that property owners should have freedom to host food trucks. Councilman Bills and Councilman Reynolds supported the code, emphasizing fairness for brick-and-mortar restaurants that pay property taxes and meet building codes. Councilman Rodriguez raised concerns about increased workload for code enforcement. Councilwoman Jangula inquired about existing food truck courts (none exist) and enforcement mechanisms. Staff confirmed intent to fully enforce the new code with a citation process and civil penalties. No vote was taken; the code language is to be presented for adoption at the October 5 meeting, pending review by the Canyon County Prosecutor's office. - Property Tax Impact of House Bills 389 and 673: Finance Director Doug presented an analysis of the cumulative effect of HB 389 (which limits property tax growth to 3% plus new construction) and HB 673 (which allows agricultural land converted to other uses to retain its lower agricultural valuation for city tax purposes). Over the four tax years from 2022 to 2025 (fiscal years 2023-2026), Nampa collected $170 million in property taxes, including foregone. Without the two bills, the city could have collected an estimated $205 million — a cumulative loss of approximately $34 million ($5 million per year from HB 389 alone, with an additional $3.1-3.2 million per year from HB 673). Doug noted that this loss is equivalent to the amount of the override levy the city is seeking. The council discussed how these bills shift the tax burden to residential property owners and undermine the goal of growth paying for itself. A fiscal impact tool is being developed with third-party review to evaluate future developments. Councilman Griffin questioned whether growth currently pays for itself; Doug replied the tool would provide guardrails. The council agreed to continue communication with local legislators and possibly invite county commissioners to address HB 673. Chief of Staff Clayton noted that the Office of Performance Evaluation (OPE) is already studying the issue, indicating legislative interest. Key Outcomes - Staff will bring the final mobile food vendor code language for council approval at the October 5 meeting, with fees to be set by a separate resolution. - The city will develop a fiscal impact tool to assess whether new developments cover their costs, incorporating the effects of HB 673. - Council directed consideration of expedited annexation of enclave properties to improve code enforcement consistency. - Council will schedule further meetings with state legislators, potentially including county commissioners, to advocate for revision of HB 673.

The Nampa Planning and Zoning Commission met on September 15, 2026, at 6:00 PM. The meeting covered staff communications, a consent agenda, a rescheduled item, a landscape plan amendment, and three public hearings on annexations and zoning changes. All votes were unanimous except one recusal. The meeting was adjourned after approvals. Consent Calendar - Approved consent agenda (moved by Garner, seconded by Kehoe): All in favor. No further details provided. Staff Communications - City Council updates (Mr. Ashby): Reported approvals from September 8, 2026: final plat for Sunnyvale East 2 (assisted living facility), annexation/zoning for Grace Bible Church, zoning code amendments for ADUs/starter homes, vacation of emergency access easement at 3184 East Mossy Rock Court, and annexation/zoning for city of Nampa airport. All had been recommended by P&Z and approved by Council. - New City Attorney introduction: Blair Larson introduced himself, previously city attorney of Sweet Home, Oregon, with experience in economic development and land use. Business Item: Rescheduling of Item 4-4 - Item 4-4 (annexation and zoning to BC for 3005 North Middleton Road, Hazard Lake Holdings) was rescheduled to October 27, 2026 due to non-compliance with property posting by the applicant and the city. No further action taken. Business Item: Landscape Plan Amendment – Sunnyvale East - Proposal: Change approved landscape plan along Carcher Road from a 6-foot solid vinyl fence and 3–4 foot berm to a 25-foot landscape buffer with enhanced landscaping, no fence or berm. The owner of the future assisted living facility desired open visibility to traffic. - Motion to approve (Morgan, second Garner): Passed 7–0 (roll call: Garner aye, Miller aye, Daffer yes, Kehoe aye, Morgan yes, Copeland aye). Commissioner Feem present but not listed in roll call? Actually roll call had Garner, Miller, Daffer, Turner absent, Kehoe, Morgan, Kirkman absent, Copeland, Feem? The transcript shows Feem present. Vote recorded as ayes from all present. Commission confirmed proposal meets city code. Public Hearings Item 4-1: Emberwood Subdivision (Annexation, Zoning RS4, Preliminary Plat) - Applicant: Sabrina Durchy representing SD Land Consulting on behalf of James and Red Ada Dorn Camp. Property at 5712 Homedale Road, 8.9 acres. - Proposal: Annexation and zoning to RS4 (medium density residential), preliminary plat for 46 single-family lots (4,000–7,298 sq ft), 12 common lots, 15.5% open space (1.39 acres), with amenities including pavilion, fire pits, soccer field, play area, pathways. Density 5.12 units/acre. Estimated impact fees over $600,000. - Staff report (Terry Friend): Property is contiguous to city limits; future land use map designates medium density residential. Adjacent uses: north – Caldwell (Jackson apartment complex 316 units), south – Wagers Dairy subdivision (under construction), west – Caldwell (Wagers Acres), east – Canyon County commercial/trailer park. Traffic impact study not required. Fire district requires two access roads (connection to Wagers Dairy). Police estimated 14 additional officers and $17,920 first-year cost. Late public comment from Amy Woodruff (civil engineer) expressed strong support. - Public testimony: None. - Discussion: Commissioners noted the development serves as a good buffer between higher-density Caldwell and single-family Nampa. No opposition. - Motion to approve (Daffer, second Kehoe): Passed 7–0 (roll call: Garner yes, Miller yes, Daffer yes, Kehoe aye, Morgan yes, Copeland yes, Feem aye). Item 4-2: 4302 East Locust Lane Annexation and Zoning RS8.5 - Applicant: Anthony and Sarah Fine (absent; staff proceeded). Property currently in Canyon County. - Proposal: Annexation and zoning to RS8.5 to connect to city sewer. No development proposed. City code violations noted by Nampa Code Compliance; standard engineering comments. - Staff report (Candice Fry): Property is contiguous; future land use medium density residential. Surrounding zoning: north – Canyon County single-family, south – Canyon County, west – RS6 (Southern Ridge subdivision), east – Canyon County. No public comments. - Public testimony: None. - Motion to approve (Garner, second Daffer): Passed 7–0 (roll call same as above). Item 4-3: MerriCrete / Triple Crown Annexation and Zoning IL (148 acres near Flamingo Ave and I-84) - Applicant: Sabrina Durchy representing MerriCrete Landholding and Triple Crown Development LLC; property owner Lance Thewison present. Ten parcels (including I-84 right-of-way) at addresses from 0000 to 7425 East Flamingo Avenue and 0 McDermott Road. - Proposal: Annexation and zoning to Light Industrial (IL). Site has operated as gravel pit and concrete batch plant since 1970s (legal non-conforming use under Canyon County). Applicant seeks annexation to align with city’s planned industrial area and to prepare for future Highway 16 extension. No changes to operations proposed; any future redevelopment would require separate approval. - Staff report (Christy Watkins): Property is contiguous via I-84 path; future land use map shows industrial. City services (water, sewer) available; 50-foot right-of-way dedication along McDermott Road required. Engineering comments on access, traffic. Applicant notes Canyon County recommended annexation. - Public testimony: Four speakers: - Jeff Smith (6705 East Flamingo Ave): Concerned his residence would become an enclave; asked about protection and future purchase. - Andrew Baker (7584 Cypress Lane): Noted boundary line cuts through Mr. Smith’s driveway; asked about grandfathering. - Unnamed speaker (6225 East Carson Ave): Requested stop signs at Flamingo/Robinson due to truck traffic. - Keith Lewis (557 North McDermott Road): Clarified ownership of parcel “0 McDermott Road” and asked about easement on Overland. - Megan Clements (6705 East Flamingo Ave): Asked about impacts to her property (shared fence), protections (setbacks, landscaping, dust, noise, truck traffic), and potential forced annexation. - Applicant response: Lance Thewison explained his goal to preemptively relocate the batch plant before Highway 16 splits the site. He has no plans to force annexation of neighbors or extend utilities to them. The Overland right-of-way is 30 ft; he is negotiating sale to neighbor. Shared well issue: city water available; neighbor could connect if annexed. - Staff response (Daniel Badger, City Engineer): The city does not force annexation historically (except rare enclaves). Stop sign warrant analysis can be done after annexation. The city partners with state on Highway 16; state now leads. Parcel identification uses R-numbers, not addresses. - Discussion: Commissioners clarified this is only an annexation; no immediate changes. Future development would trigger public hearings and protections (setbacks, landscaping). Commissioner Morgan recused due to conflict of interest. - Motion to approve (Garner, second Daffer): Passed 6–0–1 (roll call: Garner yes, Miller yes, Daffer yes, Kehoe aye, Morgan recused, Copeland yes, Feem aye). Key Outcomes - Consent agenda: Approved. - Sunnyvale East landscape plan amendment: Approved (7–0). - Item 4-4 rescheduled: To October 27, 2026. - Emberwood Subdivision: Recommended approval to City Council (7–0). - 4302 East Locust Lane annexation/zoning: Recommended approval (7–0). - MerriCrete/Triple Crown annexation/zoning IL: Recommended approval (6–0–1). - Meeting adjourned at conclusion of business.

The Nampa City Council met on September 8, 2026, at 5:00 PM. The meeting opened with a prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, followed by the approval of the consent agenda and a series of public hearings, action items, and staff reports. Key topics included the adoption of a utility rate study, the annexation and zoning for Grace Bible Church, and a discussion on a Motorola Solutions master service agreement. Several proclamations were also presented. Consent Calendar - Approved subdivision final plat for an assisted living facility at Carter Road and North Middleton Road. - Approved annexation and zoning to RS4 and a conditional use permit for duplexes (Southside IT Mod) - recommended for approval. - Approved annexation and zoning to IL for industrial buildings southeast of East Victory Road and North Happy Valley Road. - Approved a conditional use permit for a non-commercial kennel license (denied by commission but later approved with conditions on appeal? The transcript states: "four in favor and two opposed, and so it was approved with some conditions"). - Approved annexation and zoning to RS4 and BC for a master plan community (Lone Star 110 LLC) - recommended for approval. Public Comments & Testimony - Jeff Hatch (architect, 5119 Briar Crest Drive) expressed concerns about the development of the Elite RV property, questioning whether self-storage is the highest and best use for the site. He suggested a well-planned industrial area would better serve the community for long-term growth and job creation. He stated he was not asking for action on the pending reconsideration. - Justin Reynolds (Club Storage Condos, 4751 Eustach Road) updated the council on road changes to Eustach, Star, and Awahi. He described hardships caused by a closed median with a signalized intersection, forcing large vehicles to travel 1.5 to 4 miles to make U-turns. He proposed allowing a curb cut for direct access to a consolidated driveway to improve safety. Crystal Craig (Transportation Director) responded that the corridor study was published in 2022 and that a state grant funded the signal, not a roundabout. She did not recommend a curb cut due to safety concerns near the signal. Proclamations - Hispanic Heritage Month (September 15 – October 15, 2026) – presented by Mari, representing the Idaho Hispanic Community Center. She invited the community to a celebration on Sunday. - Suicide Awareness and Prevention Month (September 2026) – presented by Caden, who emphasized the importance of mental health support and suicide prevention collaboration. - National Recovery Month (September 2026) – presented by Marty Cooper of Southwest Idaho Recovery Community Center (SIRCC). He reported that last year's rally had 94 vendors and over 2,000 attendees and stressed collaboration among recovery providers. Discussion Items - Motorola Solutions Master Service Agreement (Item 1-6D): Councilman Griffin raised concerns about data privacy, specifically regarding anonymized data retention and the definition of "anonymized customer data" in the addendum. Lieutenant Napoleon and City Attorney Preston Radder explained that cloud storage necessitates data being held by Motorola and that the agreement is a boilerplate template that can be amended for specific services. Motion to approve passed 4-1 (Griffin opposed). - Deferred Maintenance Presentation (Tom Points, Public Works Director): Points reported that the city has $600 million in deferred maintenance projects (transportation and water) and an ongoing need of $55 million per year. He proposed a first phase of $36 million using $5 million in one-time funds, with a design-build approach to manage 118 projects. He also noted that a registration fee ballot measure is set for November 3, 2026. Council President Bills added that buildings have $100 million in deferred maintenance, with $20 million acute. - New City Attorney Introduction: Blair was introduced as the new in-house attorney, bringing 17 years of local government experience and a JD/MPA from BYU. - Utility Rate Study (Item 5-5): The council considered whether to adopt the final report and continue with the current three-tiered rate structure or move to a flat (uniform) rate. John Spencer (Water Resources Director) and Chris Gonzalez (FCS consultant) explained that the tiered structure encourages conservation and provides relief for low users. Councilman Reynolds argued that a flat rate is more equitable, while Councilman Griffin supported tiered rates. After a motion to hold a joint meeting with the Board of Appraisers failed (2-3), a subsequent motion to adopt the study and continue with tiered rates passed 3-2 (Reynolds and Rodriguez opposed). - Grace Bible Church Annexation and Zoning (Item 6-1): A request to annex and rezone two parcels at Midway and Lake Lowell for a new church campus (88,479 sq ft, 1,300 seats, 690 parking stalls, 7.5 acres open space). Pastor Keith Wagner noted the church has outgrown its current location and is using Lone Star Middle School for overflow. Staff reported unanimous P&Z recommendation. Public testimony included support and concerns about traffic, wildlife (near Deer Flat National Wildlife Refuge), and infrastructure. Multiple council members disclosed conversations with the pastor. Condition of approval included a future traffic impact study. Motion to approve passed 5-0. - Code Amendments (Item 6-2): Adopted text amendments to align city code with new state legislation on accessory dwelling units, starter home subdivisions, and other provisions, effective February 2027. Passed unanimously. - Emergency Access Easement Vacation (Item 6-3): Approved vacation of an easement on Mossy Rock Court, with retention of a public utility easement. Passed unanimously. - Airport Annexation and Zoning (Item 6-4): Approved annexation and rezoning to IL (light industrial) for city-owned parcels near the airport. Passed unanimously. - Motorola Security Camera Upgrade (Item 5-6): Approved $195,280 contract for citywide camera upgrades (fixed building security, not traffic cameras). Passed unanimously. - Franklin Road and McDermott Road Intersection Project (Item 5-7): Approved interagency agreement up to $500,000. Passed unanimously. - Garrety Traffic Safety Design (Item 5-8): Approved task order amendment $170,820 for design completion. Passed unanimously. - PLC Controllers Procurement (Item 5-9): Approved sole source contract $162,639.83 for proprietary controllers, with a comment from Councilman Reynolds about avoiding future proprietary lock-in. Passed unanimously. - Idaho Hispanic Community Center Boiler Replacement (Item 5-10): Approved $217,000 contract. Passed unanimously. - East Canyon Community Annexation (First Reading, Item 7-1): Passed under suspension of rules for annexation and zoning of 357.17 acres into RS4, RS6, RMH, and BC designations. Passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - Motorola Solutions Master Service Agreement approved 4-1. - Deferred maintenance program initiated with $5 million one-time funding; further bonding to be considered in May. - Utility rate study adopted with recommendation to continue tiered rate structure (vote 3-2). - Grace Bible Church annexation and zoning approved 5-0; traffic impact study required at building permit stage. - Several consent agenda items, proclamations, and other action items approved unanimously. - Council entered executive session to discuss acquisition of real property for parks and recreation (Idaho Code 74-2061).

No agenda, minutes, or transcript were supplied for this meeting. Therefore, no discussion items, public comments, consent calendar actions, or key outcomes can be reported.

The meeting on September 8, 2026, consisted entirely of pre-meeting audio and video equipment testing. No formal agenda items were discussed, no public comments were taken, and no decisions or votes were made. The transcript indicates only technical troubleshooting and microphone checks by city staff and council members. Therefore, no substantive summary of official business is available. Consent Calendar - None. Public Comments & Testimony - None. Discussion Items - None. Key Outcomes - None.

No agenda, minutes, or transcript were provided for this meeting. As a result, no discussion items, public comments, or decisions can be summarized.

The meeting convened at 16:34 UTC with immediate technical difficulties. A speaker noted a black screen and that the audio was not appearing on the microphone side due to a program update reset. The meeting appeared to be delayed while attempting to resolve the display and audio issues. No substantive agenda items, public comments, or decisions were recorded.

The Nampa Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on August 25, 2026, beginning at 6:00 PM. The Commission considered four major items: a duplex development (South Side Duplexes), an industrial rezoning (Happy Valley Road), a non-commercial kennel permit, and a large master-planned community (Lone Star). The meeting featured extensive public testimony and deliberation. Consent Calendar - Approved the consent agenda, which included four final plats approved by City Council and two public hearings from the July 14, 2026 meeting: a variance for reduced front yard setback and landscape buffer at 3424 East Greenhurst Road (approved 5-1) and a zoning map amendment from BC to BN and R-D with a development agreement and preliminary plat for Springshores Commons (approved by a 3-3 tie-breaking vote by the mayor). Public Comments & Testimony - South Side Duplexes: Neighbors expressed concerns about increased traffic, safety of children playing in streets, loss of privacy, and the impact of connecting a stub street to their quiet neighborhood. One resident requested a wall for privacy. The applicant committed to a six-foot vinyl privacy fence and open space buffers. - Happy Valley Industrial Rezoning: Multiple residents and nearby property owners opposed the application, citing incompatibility with the rural residential character, increased noise, light pollution, traffic congestion, potential health impacts from diesel fumes and dust, and decreased property values. A petition with nearly unanimous opposition from neighbors within 300 feet was submitted. One speaker supported the project as a logical extension of existing industrial uses and beneficial for the airport. - Non-Commercial Kennel: Friends and colleagues of the applicant testified that she provides excellent care for her seven rescued dogs and that the animals are well-behaved and healthy. The applicant herself spoke about the emotional support the dogs provide and her plans to move to a property with fewer restrictions. Opposing testimony was not presented, but police department records cited previous animal welfare violations. - Lone Star Master Plan Community: Numerous residents opposed the project, citing high density (over 1,000 dwelling units), traffic congestion on already overloaded roads (especially Midway, Lone Star, and Carcher), loss of farmland and rural character, inadequate infrastructure, and concerns about water supply and irrigation ditch maintenance. A few speakers acknowledged the need for growth but urged lower density and better traffic mitigation. Discussion Items - South Side Duplexes (Item 3-1): The Commission discussed parking requirements (76 spaces provided vs. 71 required), the reduced rear yard setback (four feet for duplex lots), and the impact of connecting Taylor Street to the existing neighborhood. Concerns were raised about the small rear yards and the lack of front yard setback for garages. The applicant noted that the project had been modified based on neighbor feedback, including replacing 14 duplexes with six single-family lots. The Commission approved the project with conditions. - Happy Valley Industrial Rezoning (Item 3-2): Debate centered on compatibility between the proposed 30,000-square-foot warehouse and flex space and the surrounding residences. Commissioners weighed property rights, airport compatibility (which prefers industrial over residential near the airport), and the potential for traffic and noise impacts. A motion to approve with a development agreement requiring a truck turn lane failed 4-4. A subsequent motion to approve with a development agreement that would reconfigure the site plan to lessen impacts on neighbors passed 4-2. - Non-Commercial Kennel (Item 3-3): The Commission considered the applicant's request to keep seven dogs under a conditional use permit. Police reports documented previous animal welfare issues and a revoked permit. After initial motions to approve (with a two-year time limit) and to deny both failed (3-3), a compromise motion to approve for 18 months (or until the occupant no longer resides at the property) passed 4-2, limited to the seven named dogs. - Lone Star Master Plan Community (Item 3-4): Staff presented the proposal as the first master plan community under the Southwest Nampa Specific Area Plan, with 149 acres of mixed-use development including commercial, multifamily (with a requested 20% density bonus to 14.4 units per acre), and single-family residential (RS4, 5-8 units per acre). The Commission discussed phasing, traffic impact studies, roadway improvements, and compatibility with existing large-lot subdivisions. An amendment to require lots abutting existing homes to be 10,000–12,000 square feet was incorporated into the development agreement. The project was approved unanimously. Key Outcomes - South Side Duplexes: Approved (4-2) with staff-recommended conditions. The recommendation will go to City Council. - Happy Valley Industrial Rezoning: Approved (4-2) with a development agreement that requires the site plan to be reconfigured to minimize visual and noise impacts on adjacent residences, and a recommendation that City Council consider a truck turn lane. - Non-Commercial Kennel: Approved (4-2) for a period of 18 months or until the applicant no longer resides at the property, whichever comes first, limited to the seven dogs listed in the application. The permit is subject to the standard conditions of approval and the applicant must comply with all animal control regulations. - Lone Star Master Plan Community: Approved unanimously (6-0) with a development agreement that includes conditions for transitioning density (stepping down from commercial to multifamily to single-family), requiring lots abutting existing residential parcels to be 10,000–12,000 square feet, and ensuring compliance with the Southwest Nampa Specific Area Plan and roadway improvement standards.

This meeting focused on a new financial analysis tool to evaluate the net fiscal impact of subdivision developments, legal options for growth moratoriums, and the distinction between lawful impact fees and prohibited operational fees. Key discussions included the effects of House Bills 389 and 673, the legality of mitigation fees used by neighboring cities, and the city's legal authority to deny or condition development applications. Discussion Items - Fiscal Impact Analysis Tool: Chris and Doug presented a new model to calculate the 10-year net fiscal impact of proposed subdivisions, using Trestle Creek 1 as an example. The tool allows adjustment of variables such as density, property values, growth rates, and impact fee schedules. For Trestle Creek, the midpoint 10-year net impact was $235,000, with a range of -$14,000 to $486,000 depending on lot valuations. The tool is intended to be used upfront before developer applications proceed to Planning & Zoning and Council. It will be piloted with trusted developers before being made publicly available. - Growth Moratorium Discussion: Rodney reviewed state code options for moratoriums (emergency and interim), both requiring a finding of "imminent peril to public health, safety, or welfare." He noted that Idaho law presumes growth must be planned for, and a moratorium cannot be used to permanently stop growth. Doug added that stopping growth in Nampa alone would not prevent Canyon County or other cities from approving development in the city's area of impact. - Legal Analysis of Mitigation Fees: City Attorney Preston Rutter provided a detailed legal framework, explaining that Idaho is a Dillon's Rule state and that cities can only impose fees explicitly authorized by statute. Impact fees under the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act (IDIFA) can only fund capital facilities, not operational costs such as police salaries or ongoing maintenance. He warned that using fees for operations — even if labeled "voluntary" — is high risk and could lead to mandatory disgorgement plus 8% prejudgment interest if successfully challenged. He contrasted the approach taken by the City of Star, noting that their collected police and fire fees of $6.1 million with only $3.4 million spent raises questions about whether the fees are truly cost-based. - Concerns About HB 389 and HB 673: Councilman Rodriguez and Mayor expressed frustration with the ongoing impact of HB 389 (affecting property tax revenue) and HB 673 (land designation changes), noting that HB 673 may have a larger fiscal impact than HB 389. The tool currently does not factor in HB 673, but the team will work with staff to add a mechanism where applicable. - Private Property Rights and Developer Relations: Several council members emphasized the importance of maintaining good relationships with developers while ensuring that growth pays for growth. The city plans to meet with state legislators the following week to discuss legislative changes that could give cities more tools to manage growth. Key Outcomes - The fiscal impact analysis tool will be finalized, piloted with selected developers, and made publicly available after piloting. - The city will explore adding HB 673 impacts into the tool. - No moratorium was proposed; council acknowledged the legal hurdles and practical limitations. - Council was advised that mandatory cash fees for operational expenses (e.g., police salaries) are not legally defensible. Instead, the city should rely on traditional tax revenue, including potential levy overrides, to fund ongoing operational needs. - The city attorney confirmed that no significant legislative changes to mitigation fee law have occurred since the last discussion, though minor touch-ups to IDIFA may have occurred. - Council members expressed appreciation for the legal clarity and the financial tool, noting it will help them make data-driven decisions.