Public Meetings - Peabody, Massachusetts

The Peabody City Council convened on Thursday, June 25, 2026, at 7:30 PM in the Frank Elwigan Auditorium, City Hall, and remotely via Zoom. The meeting covered a proposed accessory dwelling unit (ADU) zoning amendment, a junk dealer license renewal, two special permit applications, and several ordinances and motions, including a trash fee, sewer/water rates, and extended liquor hours for the FIFA World Cup. Consent Calendar - No consent calendar items were identified; all items were considered individually. Public Comments & Testimony - ADU Ordinance: A resident of Ward 1 spoke in opposition to the proposed ADU amendment, specifically objecting to the introduction of a "local ADU" concept. He stated that the prohibition of local ADUs would foreclose any opportunity for relief within the regulations and requested that the local ADU concept be stricken from the ordinance. No other public comments were made in favor or opposition. - Special Permit – 117 Linfield Street: Joel Brenner, an abutter of 5 Al Alexander Street, spoke in favor of the project, noting the neighborhood was excited about the proposed ice cream/breakfast restaurant and requested preservation of the vegetated buffer zone. - Other items: No public comments were made for the junk dealer license renewal or the Revel Balloon Company special permit. Discussion Items - Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Zoning Amendment: Drew Levin from Community Development presented the proposed ordinance, which had been under development since February 2025. The planning board had sought clarification on state regulations, building size, and short-term rental restrictions. Councilors expressed frustration with the timing of feedback from other departments (fire, health, treasurer, police). Councilor Peach noted that the building department currently operates without a local ordinance, creating turmoil. Councilor Turko raised concerns about public safety, including fire sprinkler requirements for three-family conversions and police access to rear ADUs. Councilor Rosignal criticized the state mandate as an unfunded mandate. After debate, the council voted to continue the hearing to July 9, 2026, to allow time to incorporate feedback from the fire, police, health, and treasurer departments. The motion passed 11-0. - Junk Dealer License – Blue River Diamonds: The petitioner explained that a lapse in renewal occurred because notices were sent to the mall address rather than his business. Councilor Daigle supported the renewal, noting the business is thorough and restricts reselling from underage individuals. The license was approved 11-0. - Special Permit – 117 Linfield Street (Restaurant Continuation): Petitioner Charles Holden requested a special permit to transfer and continue the non-conforming use of a restaurant with dairy products, and to replace the existing 1932 building with a smaller 3,000 sq ft structure. Councilor Welton outlined conditions, including maintaining all existing 2017 permit conditions, planting arborvitae in buffer zones, and compliance with department reviews. The permit was approved 11-0. - Special Permit – Revel Balloon Company: Chrissy Emerson requested a special permit for a balloon decor and party retail business at 145A Summit Street. Councilor Welton noted that helium storage was below regulatory thresholds and no safety concerns were raised. The permit was approved with hours of operation 9 AM to 9 PM, seven days a week, by a vote of 11-0. - Trash Fee Ordinance (10A): The council adopted an ordinance establishing a $200 annual trash fee per dwelling unit for residential structures of four units or less, effective July 1, 2026. It includes discounts for seniors, veterans, and compost users, and a five-year rate lock. The ordinance passed 8-3, with Councilors Martin, Ladoff, and Corvo voting no. - Sewer and Water Rates (10B): An ordinance amending sewer and water rates was adopted as amended, correcting a typo in the 2023 base rate ($5.73 instead of $7.73). The vote was 8-3, with the same councilors opposing. - Tax Title Payment Plan (10C): An ordinance amending the tax title payment plan was adopted unanimously, 11-0. - Extended Liquor Hours for FIFA World Cup: Councilor Rosignal introduced a motion to adopt the Governor’s authorization allowing bars and restaurants to extend liquor hours until 3 AM through July 31, 2026, for the World Cup. The motion passed 11-0. - Other Motions: Councilor Ladoff moved to schedule a meeting for the Complete Streets subcommittee and an ad hoc committee on revenue generating ideas for the municipal golf course, both approved. Councilor Corvo moved to receive an update on pending litigation regarding the ADU matter by July 9, passed. Councilor Peach received reports on the city’s credit rating (Moody’s report) and a block party request, both approved. Key Outcomes - ADU Ordinance: Continued to July 9, 2026, to incorporate feedback from fire, police, health, and treasurer departments (vote 11-0). - Junk Dealer License: Approved for Blue River Diamonds at 210 Andover Street (vote 11-0). - Special Permit – 117 Linfield Street: Approved for continuation of restaurant use with conditions, including transfer of all existing 2017 permit conditions and buffer zone planting (vote 11-0). - Special Permit – Revel Balloon Company: Approved with hours 9 AM to 9 PM daily (vote 11-0). - Trash Fee Ordinance: Adopted effective July 1, 2026 (vote 8-3). - Sewer/Water Rates Ordinance: Adopted as amended (vote 8-3). - Tax Title Payment Plan Ordinance: Adopted (vote 11-0). - Extended Liquor Hours: Opted in to state authorization for extended hours until 3 AM through July 31, 2026 (vote 11-0). - Complete Streets Subcommittee: Initial meeting to be scheduled by Municipal Safety Committee, then handed to Councilor Ladoff. - Golf Course Revenue Ideas: Neighborhood meeting to be held first. - ADU Litigation Update: Requested from the mayor or attorney by July 9. Note: The meeting date was verified as June 25, 2026, from the transcript. The agenda and minutes were not provided; the summary relies solely on the raw transcription.

The Peabody City Council met on Tuesday, June 23, 2026, to review and vote on the Fiscal Year 2027 school budget as presented by Superintendent Dr. Fadala. The meeting also later considered the city's operating budget, enterprise funds, and several transfers. After extensive public comment and council debate, the school budget was approved 9–2, and the city budget was approved 9–2. Consent Calendar - None explicitly listed; the meeting began with the education budget as the sole agenda item. - Later, the council approved several routine transfers (FY26 adjustments, CPC transfers, cable fund reserve) unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Bruna Down (61 Harrison Ave, paraprofessional for 27 years): Expressed opposition to the budget, arguing that cutting teachers increases class sizes while student needs (special education, social‑emotional) are rising. Stated that 65% of freshmen may not pass core classes and that an art teacher position at the high school and a music teacher at the middle school are not being filled despite no public notice. - Elizabeth Moover (12 Goodridge St, parent and community stakeholder): Criticized the district's transparency and governance, citing declining academic performance (75.8% complete MassCore vs. 98–100% in neighboring districts; dropout rate nearly double that of peers). She noted that only 64.8% of ninth graders pass all courses, that ELL front‑facing teachers were cut, and that the superintendent received a four‑year contract extension without a completed evaluation or public input. She asked the council to return the budget to the school committee for a more transparent process. - Kimberly (39 Forest St, parent): Expressed frustration that cuts again target student‑facing staff (teachers, deans, paras) while administrative offices remain top‑heavy. She argued that children's needs are increasing and that larger class sizes are not the answer. She urged the council to send the budget back to the school committee. Discussion Items - Superintendent’s Presentation (Dr. Fadala): - The FY27 appropriated budget is $101,967,320, a 2.9% increase over FY26 ($99 million). - The level‑service budget (Draft 0) was $104.9 million; reductions totaling just over $3 million were achieved through six drafts between February and May 2026. - Key reductions: 11.7 FTEs (no layoffs; retirements, non‑renewals of waiver teachers, and attrition). Cuts included a dean at the high school, ELL teachers at middle/high school (due to declining enrollment and students testing out), and technology savings (K–2 Chromebooks kept in school, saving $75,000). - The performing arts director position was restored after public advocacy. - Major cost drivers: health insurance (+$1.2M, 10% increase), special education out‑of‑district transportation (+$300,000), and overall transportation (+$292,000). - Council Questions and Debate: - Councillor Turko raised concerns about grant‑funded positions not being transparently listed in the budget. He argued that the superintendent should provide all grant‑related positions and salaries to the council. The superintendent responded that the appropriated budget is the baseline and that grant details are public after DESE approval (September/October). Turko also questioned the use of revolving funds for administrative salaries (e.g., Mr. Busey, Mr. Magno) and the reduction of teachers while protecting administrators. - Councillor Razignal asked about competitive grants (14 this year) and the potential for a grant writer. The superintendent noted that grants are written by leadership and that a full‑time grant manager might be considered. - Councillor Ladoff discussed graduation rates (currently 86%, goal 90%), dropout prevention programs, and social‑emotional supports (trusted adult program, Wayfinder curriculum, student resource centers). - Councillor Hockman pointed out that the school department paid $951,000 to PMLP for electricity – enough to save nearly all cut teachers – and questioned why the council cannot review PMLP's budget. - Councillor Walton asked about the 11.7 FTE reduction breakdown; the superintendent confirmed no layoffs, with about half being retirements and half non‑renewals. - Councillor Peach (as parent) asked about the K–2 technology fee and the new Chromebook policy; the superintendent promised to clarify whether the fee would still be charged. Key Outcomes - FY27 School Budget: The council voted 9–2 (Councillors Manny Martin and Corvo dissenting) to approve the $101,967,320 budget as presented. A motion to reconsider was passed 11–0, and the second vote also passed 9–2 (Martin and Corvo no). - FY27 City Operating Budget: Approved 9–2 (Martin and Corvo no) at $216,996,238.17. - Water & Sewer Enterprise Budget: Approved 9–2 at $23,409,144. - Recreation Enterprise Budget: Approved 10–0 (Councillor Hockman recused due to conflict of interest) at $2,942,359.97. - Ordinance Amendment (Employee Compensation): Approved 8–3 (Hockman, Manny Martin, Corvo dissenting), providing a 0% raise for FY26 and 2% for FY27 for non‑union employees, with a business liaison position removed. - Transfers: All six FY26 transfers (city budget adjustments, water/sewer enterprise, recreation enterprise, CPC transfers, cable fund reserve) were approved unanimously (11–0). Next Steps - The council and superintendent agreed to improve transparency by sharing grant information in real time during the fall when federal entitlements are approved. - A third‑party review of administrative structures (via Collins Center) will be completed by October 2026 to inform future budgets. - The council will hold quarterly budget updates and milestone check‑ins, as suggested during the meeting.

The Peabody Planning Board convened a public hearing on Thursday, June 18, 2026, at 7:00 PM in the lower level conference room of City Hall to consider amendments to the city's zoning ordinance regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). The hearing was held in response to the state's Affordable Homes Act (2024), which made ADUs by-right in single-family zoned lots. The board also conducted regular business, including approvals of minutes, continuances, and discussion on AI data centers. Public Comments & Testimony - Aris Rumeliotis (3 Wenworth Road): Expressed concern that the proposed ordinance would restrict ADU size to 600 square feet for his 1,280 sq ft home, which he felt was inadequate for a two-bedroom unit. He questioned why the city was prohibiting local ADUs (which allow larger units) and argued the state gives municipalities flexibility. Planning board members clarified that the 900 sq ft cap is state law and that an addition to the primary dwelling could increase the allowable ADU size. - John Gagnon (contractor, building an ADU in another city): Raised several technical concerns: (1) The ordinance's language on separate entrances appears inconsistent between sections 6.18.2 (allowing shared hallway) and 6.18.3 (requiring separate entrance); (2) The state regulation does not require parking within half a mile of a bus stop—parking is not required at all; (3) Setbacks for detached ADUs should follow accessory building setbacks (e.g., 5 ft for a garage), not primary structure setbacks, as this would make many lots infeasible; (4) For multifamily buildings, the state FAQ states ADU size is 50% of the entire building, not just one unit—the ordinance should clarify this to avoid litigation. He urged the board to address these issues. - Member of the public (unidentified, possibly John Gagnon continuing): Opposed the state mandate as an unfunded mandate, argued that detached ADUs should not be allowed with only a 5 ft setback (as they are homes, not sheds), and noted a pending court case in Peabody where a building inspector denied a garage-with-ADU at 5 ft setback. He also questioned the requirement for separate addresses, stating that utilities (water, sewer, electric) will come from the primary unit per PMLP policy, making separate addresses unnecessary and potentially confusing. Discussion Items - ADU Ordinance Presentation: Andrew Levin (Senior Planner) presented the draft ordinance, highlighting differences from the state model: (1) The city would ban multiple ADUs on a lot (state allows up to 3 with special permit); (2) Require one parking space per ADU regardless of proximity to transit (state prohibits parking mandates within half a mile of a bus stop); (3) Ban short-term rentals of ADUs; (4) Require ADUs to follow primary structure dimensional setbacks; (5) Prohibit local ADUs (which could be larger than 950 sq ft); (6) Require separate addresses for all ADUs (attached and detached). - Board Discussion: - Dr. Arnold noted inconsistency between sections 6.18.2 and 6.18.3 on separate entrances—Levin agreed to clarify. - Dr. Arnold questioned the legality of requiring parking within half a mile of a transit station, citing state prohibition. Levin said this could be added to the board's recommendation. - A board member argued one parking space is insufficient, especially for a 3-bedroom ADU, and questioned legal pushback against the state law. Levin noted only about 1,200 ADUs have been built statewide. - Another member raised concerns about detached ADUs using 5 ft setbacks via a garage loophole, which is being litigated. The board discussed that the ordinance would require primary structure setbacks, which could be 25 ft side/40 ft rear in some zones. - The board clarified that ADUs cannot be sold separately, and owner occupancy is not required—the owner can live elsewhere and rent the unit. - AI Data Centers Discussion: The board received a memo from the city council requesting recommendations on AI data centers. Andrew Levin noted the planning department is researching regulations. Board member Jeff Saliva read a prepared statement arguing data centers are critical infrastructure and should be allowed in industrial areas like Centennial Park and Russell Street, with performance standards and developer-funded infrastructure. Other members strongly opposed, citing massive energy consumption (a 100,000 sq ft co-location data center could draw 125 megawatts, nearly the entire Peabody peak load), noise from diesel generators, and low job creation. The board voted to form a subcommittee to study the issue further. Key Outcomes - ADU Ordinance Recommendation: The Planning Board voted unanimously (8-0) to recommend adoption of the ADU zoning ordinance to the City Council with the following considerations: more clarity on parking requirements, definition of short-term rentals (prohibiting rentals under 30 days), and clarification on square footage calculation for multifamily buildings (to align with state FAQ using entire building square footage). The motion was made by a board member and seconded; all members voted yes. - Continuances: - 532 Lowell Street (Map 35, Lot 28): Granted extension to July 16, 2026, pending peer review. - 81 Prospect Street (Map 39, Lot 6A): Granted extension to July 16, 2026, per prior request. - AI Data Centers: The board voted to create a subcommittee (volunteers: Dr. Otto, Dr. Arnold, Jeff Saliva, and others) to study data center regulations and report back. The subcommittee will likely meet at 6 PM before regular board meetings. - Minutes: Approved minutes of the June 4, 2026 meeting unanimously.

The Finance Committee met at 4:00 PM, followed by the regular City Council meeting at 6:00 PM on June 11, 2026. The Finance Committee considered four transfer requests, all of which were approved unanimously (5-0) and later passed by the full City Council (10-0). The Council also adopted a $1.2 million bond order for roof replacements, approved routine license renewals, and referred several items to committees for further discussion. No public comments were made. Consent Calendar - Approval of the records from the regular meetings of May 14, May 18, and June 2, 2026. - Banner request from Care Dimension (75 Sylvan Street, Danvers) approved. - Block party requests: 28 Ravenwood Road to 16 Brentwood Drive (July 25) and 11 Hammer Road through 14 Hammer Road (August 15) approved. - General license renewal for Extended Stay America (200 Jubilee Drive) for 2026 approved. - Junk dealer license for Wallace Street Flea Market (20 Wallace Street) set for public hearing. Discussion Items Finance Committee Transfers (Subcommittee Report) Councilor Peach reported the Finance Committee's actions on four transfers, all moved by Councilor Gamash and passed unanimously (5-0). 1. Transfer for Grant Matches Three projects were funded from bond premium reserve: cybersecurity for water treatment plants (total project $185,000; $50,000 grant, city match $135,000), and two dam upgrades at Winona and Spring Pond dams (matching FEMA funds: $106,400 and $55,125). William Paul, DPS Director, confirmed the cybersecurity work was to prevent hacking and the dam work was required by state inspections. Councilor Turco asked for a project overview. Motion to appropriate $135,000 (account 300-33015-57447-2026-411), $106,400 (account 300-33015-57447-2026-412), and $55,125 (account 300-33015-57447-2026-413) passed. 2. Transfer for Bike Path Easements $221,000 from sale of real estate for permanent and temporary easements for the bike path extension from Lieutenant Ross Park to the bridge over Route 1 under I-95. Kurt Bellavance, Community Development Director, clarified the route. Motion to appropriate $221,000 (account 270-33005-58116) passed. 3. Transfer for Fire Pumper Equipment $150,000 from free cash to equip two new fire pumpers arriving in August 2026. Fire Chief Dowlin explained that the equipment was purchased separately to allow competitive bidding rather than factory-installed options. A list dated July 10, 2023, covered the needed items. Motion to appropriate $150,000 (account 3000-54158-2026) passed. 4. Transfer for Cable Fund Expense $186,131.46 from Comcast fees (first quarter) to fund PAT TV (90% earmarked). Motion to transfer from receipts reserved cable fund to cable fund expense passed. Bond Order for Roof Replacements Councilor Gamash, co-sponsored by Councilor Peach, introduced a bond order for $1.2 million to replace roofs at South and West schools (capital projects). The order was previously introduced on April 23, 2026, and published on May 14 and May 28. Councilor Turco asked about the status of rescinding the original bond funding; Councilor Peach confirmed that the Director of Finance (Mr. Tanger) had filed the rescission paperwork, but it was awaiting finalization from municipal finance. The motion passed 10-0. Subsidized Housing Inventory (Chapter 40B) Councilor Manning Martin reported that the city's subsidized housing inventory stands at 10.56%, but a loss of 57 units in 2026 and 2027 would bring it to approximately 10.3%. He moved to refer item 7B to the Industrial and Community Development Committee for Stacy Burnson to present current data and pipeline projects, as falling below 10% could have implications. The motion passed. Referrals to Committees - Item 8A (petition) referred to the city solicitor. - Items 7A, 7C, 7D, 7E, 7F, 8B, 8D, 8E, and late items 1-3 referred to the Finance Committee for budget discussion. Key Outcomes - All four Finance Committee transfers were approved by the full City Council on roll call votes of 10-0. - The $1.2 million bond order for South and West school roof replacements was adopted 10-0. - The subsidized housing inventory issue was referred to committee for further review. - Multiple routine licenses and permits were approved. - The meeting adjourned after all business was completed.

The Finance Committee of the Peabody City Council met on June 2, 2026, to consider two major proposals from Mayor Betoncourt: a new residential trash fee and increases to water and sewer rates. The meeting included extensive public comment, council debate, and multiple votes. The committee ultimately recommended both items to the full council, which passed them with amendments later that same evening. Public Comments & Testimony - Larry Roberti (13 Radio Road) expressed concern that a fee would become permanent, comparing it to the sales tax, and argued it should be treated as a Proposition 2½ override requiring voter approval. - Diane Foel (12 Sherman Street) asked about enforcement of the fee on tenants vs. landlords, and noted difficulty for landlords passing costs to tenants. - Lee Claudins (149 Linfield Street) criticized reliance on future improvements, urged focus on health care costs, and questioned how Peabody got stuck with prevailing wage increases in the Republic contract. - Mike Barton (45 Aberdeen Road) questioned the mayor's credibility given past promises, and suggested negotiating health insurance with other carriers. - Linda D'Ambrosio (17 Styles Drive) asked whether the trash fee would limit bag/sticker requirements, and argued residents should not pay for city employee health insurance increases. - Rochelle Ignata (54 Russell Street) advocated for a pay-as-you-throw program instead of a flat fee, noting 162 communities use that model. - Cindy Yates (32 Redberry Lane) asked for confirmation that HOAs are exempt, questioned the percentage of headcount reduction (20 positions), and suggested negotiating union health insurance. - Russell Donovan (12 Quail Road) argued against the fee, stating it unfairly targets homeowners while businesses and condos are exempt, and noted that a tax increase would be more equitable and tax-deductible. - John Salisbury (7 Emerson) said the decision should not bypass Proposition 2½, and advocated for pay-as-you-throw as a consumption-based model. - Rhonda Anderson (12 Jackson Street) asked why comparable cities like Woburn have no trash fee, and urged the council to consider all options before voting. - Mike Radinowski (32 Sabino Farm Road) suggested the city buy its own trash trucks to save money and create jobs. - Ron D'Ambrosio (17 Styles Drive) expressed frustration with rising costs and called for state-level action on prevailing wage. - Travis Bojick (20 Margin Street) supported city-owned trucks and pay-as-you-throw, and said the fee should come out of taxes. - Amanda Green (18 Roosevelt Avenue, via Zoom) favored pay-as-you-go as a one-person household. - Jason Stone (16 Fairview Avenue, via Zoom) asked for transparency on Essex Tech costs and suggested commercial properties contribute more. - Miss Swirling (8 Eisenhower Road, via Zoom) urged rejection of both the trash fee and water/sewer increases, citing cumulative burden on seniors and families. - John Lewis (7 Buford Road) questioned how the city got to this point and asked for a long-term plan. - Tracy Pescia (57 Aberdeen Avenue, via Zoom) opposed the flat fee, noted her own composting service costs $190/year, and called for consideration of automation and other options. - Sue (18 Sabino Farm Road) urged better traffic enforcement to generate revenue, and expressed concern for seniors on fixed incomes. Discussion Items - Trash Fee Proposal: Mayor Betoncourt presented a $200 annual fee for single-, two-, and three-family homes (condos and 4+ units exempt). Discounts for seniors (65+), veterans, and those with compost contracts. A five-year freeze on the fee was proposed. The fee would generate about $2.4 million annually to delay hitting Proposition 2½ for five years and avoid drastic cuts. - Water and Sewer Rate Increases: An 8% increase for FY27, followed by 5% increases for FY28 and FY29 (later amended to one year). An administrative fee of $30/quarter for residential and $50/quarter for commercial (later reduced to $25/$50). Elimination of the 10% early payment discount was proposed but later defeated. The increases are needed to cover MWRA purchases during droughts, anticipated Rousselot water rights debt service ($2.4 million/year), and overall enterprise fund stability. - Council Debate: Councillors Gamash, Turco, Daigle, Peach, Higgins, and Rosignal expressed support for the trash fee as a necessary stopgap to protect services and avoid sudden Proposition 2½ override. Councillors Manning Martin, Ladoff, and Corvo opposed, arguing the fee bypasses voter approval and that more cuts should be made first. Councillor Welton proposed a full waiver for seniors and disabled, later modified to an abatement program. For water/sewer, Councillor Turco explained the admin fee was intended to stabilize the fund. Councillor Rosignal opposed the two-year 5% escalator and the elimination of the early discount. Key Outcomes - Trash Fee Approved (8-2): The full council adopted a five-year freeze at $200 per unit, with $100 discounts for seniors 65+, all veterans, and residents with compost contracts. Other existing property tax abatements (disability, blindness, etc.) also apply. The fee will be billed semi-annually. - Water/Sewer Rate Increase (8-2): An 8% increase for FY27 was approved. - 5% Increase for FY28 Only (8-2): The second 5% increase for FY29 was removed; only one year of 5% beyond FY27 was approved. - Administrative Fee (7-3): $25/quarter residential, $50/quarter commercial accounts. - Early Payment Discount Retained (6-4): The motion to eliminate the 10% discount failed. - Enacting Clause (10-0): The ordinance amendments were adopted as a package. - Trash Fee: The ordinance will take effect July 1, 2026, with no increases until June 30, 2031. The full council vote was 8-2 (Ladoff and Corvo dissenting). - Water/Sewer: The new rates and administrative fee will be effective upon passage.

The Peabody City Council held subcommittee meetings for Public Services, Legal Affairs, and Aggregate Industries, followed by a regular meeting on May 28, 2026. The Public Services Committee addressed sewage backups on Linden Road. The Legal Affairs Committee discussed a tax title payment plan, mattress disposal fee increases, a condo-to-apartment conversion issue, and the Independence Greenway extension. The Aggregate Industries Committee reviewed the 2025 annual report and heard resident concerns about emissions. The regular meeting approved appointments, received committee reports, and voted on numerous motions and resolutions. Consent Calendar - Approved appointments: Buquia Shalvere to Board of Registrars, Dagmar Whitaker to Commission on Disability, Martin Goldsworthy to Cemetery Commission, Alan DeFranzo as Cemetery Superintendent (one-year term), and Dave Cronin to Community Preservation Commission (alternate, one-year term). (Roll call 11-0) - Received and approved junk dealer licenses for Blue River Diamonds (210 Andover Street), Bill Salem Music (136 Main Street), and Kay's Jewelers (210 Andover Street) subject to public hearing and papers in order. - Received and approved entertainment license for Red T (126 Newbury Street) subject to hearing. - Approved block party requests for 2 Page Street and 6 Page Street on July 18, 2026. - Approved special event applications: Mayor's Summer Concert Series (Sundays July 12–August 16, 2026) and Portuguese American Community Cookout (June 20, 2026). - Approved use of Wiggin Auditorium for Department of Social Services and Behavioral Health event (May 27) and Peabody Education Foundation event (October 14, 2026). Public Comments & Testimony - Ted Neary (50 Linden Road) thanked the DPW team for quick response to sewage backups but noted delays in locating blockages. - Audrey Gordon (194 Newbury Street) expressed frustration that a development approved as condos was converted to apartments, despite council assurances during the special permit process. She requested future protections. - Eric Lampadecchio (3 Madison Avenue) requested that Aggregate Industries either cease emissions during inclement weather (low cloud cover) when odors accumulate, or install best available control technology (blue smoke system). He reported health concerns and said he had contacted the Board of Health, MassDEP, and the fire department. Discussion Items Linden Road Sewage Issues (Public Services Committee) - DPW Director Will Paulitz reported that sewage backups on Linden Road have been a recurring problem since July 2024. CCTV inspections revealed excessive grease, foreign debris, and root penetration in aging pipes. The city cleared roots in 2024 and 2025, issued flyers (in multiple languages in 2026), and placed the area on an annual flushing program. The next step is to add annual root cutting in the fall. - Councilors Corvo and Turko noted the problem dates back decades; prior DPW directors only took reactive measures. Councilor Manning Martin praised the proactive approach. Councilor Hockman asked about a six- or nine-month cycle; Paulitz proposed combining spring flushing with fall root cutting. - Key Outcome: The committee received the update with approval. No formal vote was recorded at the subcommittee; the matter was reported out at the regular meeting and accepted. Tax Title Payment Plan (Legal Affairs Committee) - Treasurer Titelbaum presented a new ordinance (Section 11-35) to allow payment plans for tax title properties per M.G.L. c. 60 § 62A. Key terms: 5-year term, 20% down payment, waiver of up to 50% of treasurer's interest, late payment defined as 3 business days, default after 3 missed payments. The committee made amendments to clarify interest assessed by treasurer vs. collector and to use business days. - Councilor Hockman requested language to allow up to five years and down payment of not less than 20%; Titelbaum explained the attorney general requires definite terms. Current tax title parcels: 94 parcels, $2.3 million total, average $25,000 per parcel. Collector's interest is 16% for existing, 8% for new takings. - Key Outcome: The committee voted 5-0 to adopt and advertise the ordinance. The full council later voted 11-0 to approve. Mattress Disposal Fee and Ordinance Review (Legal Affairs Committee) - Councilor Gamash proposed changes after noticing mattresses dumped at DPW. Residents pay $20 for a sticker, but haulers charge $100+ and use resident stickers. The city spent over $59,000 on mattress disposal last year. He proposed raising the fee to $40 (matching Salem and Beverly) and having Community Development review ordinances from those cities, including curbside pickup services like Tough Stuff or UTEC. - Councilors discussed potential limits on stickers per address, landlord access, and enforcement. - Key Outcome: The committee voted to refer to Community Development to review Salem/Beverly ordinances and seek curbside pickup services. Separately, the fee was increased to $40 per mattress and $40 per box spring. Both motions passed 11-0 at the regular meeting. 194 Newbury Street – Condo vs. Apartment Conversion (Legal Affairs Committee) - Resident Audrey Gordon reported that a development approved as condos under a special permit was converted to apartments. City Solicitor Kahn provided a memo citing a 1982 SJC case (CHR) that state law treats condos and apartments equally; the council cannot enforce the condo condition. Councilor Hockman and others expressed sympathy but noted legal limits. Councilor Turko raised concerns about 40B projects with condo conditions. - Key Outcome: No motion; matter disposed. Councilors advised residents to contact state legislators to seek statutory change. Independence Greenway Extension Easements (Legal Affairs Committee) - Community Development Director Kurt Bellavance presented the final step for Phase 2 of the bike path from Lieutenant Ross Park to Peabody Road, including a bridge over Route 1. The project is funded by $19.5 million in state/federal grants (including $3.5 million amendment received in March 2026). The city needs 17 easements (13 temporary, 4 permanent) including a 28,000 sq ft permanent easement at a cemetery. Total compensation: $221,000. Councilor Peach clarified that bike path funds come from separate grant buckets, not the general fund. - Key Outcome: The committee approved the order of taking, a 99-year MBTA lease, and acceptance of MassDOT easements. The full council voted 11-0 to authorize the mayor to execute the documents. Aggregate Industries 2025 Annual Report (Ad Hoc Committee) - Resident Eric Lampadecchio requested emission mitigation during inclement weather or installation of a blue smoke system. Aggregate representative Jarrett Temple stated they are not in violation of air quality regulations and are waiting for MassDEP approval to install the blue smoke system (cost over $1 million) without reopening their air permit. He estimated 15 months for DEP action. - Councilors discussed noise monitoring, blasting schedule (9 blasts in 2025, expected 16 in 2026), truck routes (Lake Street vs. Lowell Street), and hours of operation. Captain Dowling and Inspector Pelizzaro provided safety oversight. Noise levels were within limits (125 dB vs. 133 dB limit) but one location briefly reached 12 dB over background (limit 10 dB), attributed to nearby lawn mowing. - Key Outcome: The committee voted to request DEP to add the blue smoke system to the facility (passed 11-0). The 2025 annual report was approved with conditions: additional noise mitigation to ensure 10 dB increase not exceeded, spring groundwater sampling, noise monitoring twice a year (spring and fall), and compliance with all 2002 special permit conditions. (Vote 11-0) Key Outcomes - Sewage on Linden Road: DPW will implement annual root cutting in addition to spring flushing. - Tax Title Payment Plan: Ordinance adopted (11-0). - Mattress Fee: Increased to $40 per mattress/box spring (11-0). Community Development to review curbside pickup programs. - 194 Newbury Street: No action possible; council advised legislative remedy. - Independence Greenway: Easements approved (11-0), project to advertise August 3, 2026. - Aggregate Industries: DEP requested to allow blue smoke system; annual report approved with conditions (11-0). - Police at Polling Places: Motion to assign at least one officer per precinct passed (10-1); separate motion to ask city clerk to explore single officer per location (where multiple precincts share a building) passed (10-0, Daigle recused). - Salary Information: Motions passed to obtain school employee salaries (10-1) and comparable salaries from DART district schools (10-1). - Other: Received and referred several items to finance, legal, or planning boards; approved August 18, 2026 regular meeting date; requested DPW to repair guardrail and street sign; requested org chart and triple net leases; congratulated Ward II scholarship recipients.

The Peabody Planning Board met on May 21, 2026, at Wigan Auditorium, City Hall, to approve minutes, consider a subdivision plan, continue a site plan review, and discuss a draft Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) ordinance. The meeting included a public hearing on the ADU ordinance and a unanimous vote on a subdivision plan. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes (May 7, 2026): The board unanimously approved the minutes of the May 7 meeting. Discussion Items - Subdivision Plan – 18 Sparrow Lane (Belanger Family): Attorney John Kelty presented the plan to subdivide two lots (Lot A: 12,224 sq ft, 79 ft frontage; Lot B: 12,947 sq ft, 84 ft frontage). Both lots had been granted variances for area and frontage, and the existing structure on Lot B received setback relief to eliminate non-conformity. Board member Roy asked about separate addresses and driveways; Kelty confirmed these would be handled separately. The board approved the plan as presented. - 533 Lowell Street (Site Plan Review): John Kelty requested a continuance because peer review by Jim Nicholas was not yet complete. The board granted the continuance to the next meeting. - 81 Prospect Street: The board noted this matter had already been continued to the next meeting. - ADU Zoning Ordinance Draft: Drew Levin presented the draft ordinance, developed in response to the state’s Affordable Homes Act. Key points: ADUs will be allowed by right in single-family zones, but the city’s draft restricts multiple ADUs per lot, prohibits ADUs in front yards, and requires a separate entrance (unlike existing FALAs). Discussion included concerns about setback rules (e.g., accessory structure setbacks being used for residences). Board member Gagner noted the state law is ambiguous and has led to varying interpretations. The public hearing is scheduled for the second meeting in June. Key Outcomes - Subdivision Plan Approved: Motion to accept the subdivision plan for 18 Sparrow Lane (Lots A and B) passed unanimously. - Continuance Granted for 533 Lowell Street: The site plan review was continued to the next meeting pending peer review. - ADU Ordinance Next Steps: The board will hold a public hearing on the draft ADU ordinance at the second June meeting.

The Peabody City Council held committee meetings (Industrial & Community Development, Finance) followed by a regular full council meeting on May 14, 2026, addressing zoning amendments, accessory dwelling units (ADUs), special permits, budget transfers, and capital improvements. Consent Calendar - Approved several junk dealer license renewals (Cash Call, GameStop, Golden Link, Long Jewell, Maud House). - Received block party requests for Presigio Circle/Gidney Drive on June 13 and July 4, 2026. - Received and referred various communications to appropriate committees (e.g., 8A, 8B-C-D, 8E, 8F, 8G, 8L, 7A, 7B-C-E-F, 7G, 7D, 9B). Public Comments & Testimony - Special permit for Lavish Beauty Bar (106 Lynn Street): Attorney representing petitioners reported no negative neighbor feedback; state-level regulation confirmed. Approved 9-0. - Special permit for Five Star Rims expansion (100 Burney Street): Fire inspector affirmed compliance; Chamber of Commerce spoke in support, praising community involvement. Witnesses noted no complaints since new ownership. Councillor Latoff presented conditions negotiated with abutters. Approved 8-1 with extensive conditions. - Essex Tech presentation: Dr. Heidi Riccio and Beverly Griffin-Dunn answered questions on lottery system, allocation formula, and the defunct after-dark program. Discussion Items Industrial & Community Development Committee - Proposed zoning amendment (mixed-use in GB district): Attorney Jack Kelty presented a plan for 5,900 sq ft building with limited retail and two floors of apartments at Corwin Street (current vacant lot, Ramsey's Roast Beef relocation). Councillors expressed concerns about floodplain, stormwater, and citywide impact. Motions passed to request dimensional criteria from Community Development and a memo from Conservation Commission on FEMA floodplain/conservancy constraints. The item remained in committee. - ADU ordinance (Section 16.18.3): City Solicitor Don Conn and Building Commissioner Tom St. Pierre discussed state mandates, setbacks (5-10 ft for accessory structures vs. residential), and fala grandfathering. Council debated unfunded mandate, parking near transit, and sprinkler code. Two amendments passed: 1) Replace “accessory dwelling” with “single family dwelling” for dimensional standards (4-1); 2) Strike “deemed a protected use ADU” for folas, instead grandfathering them with a requirement to come up to code if converted (5-0). The amended ordinance was reported favorably to the Planning Board (4-1). Finance Committee - Essex Tech presentation: Dr. Riccio provided data on Peabody’s allocation dropping from 123 to 75 students (now 81 due to Marblehead leftover seats). She explained lottery regulations, per-pupil costs ($23K state cost vs. $14K assessed to Peabody), and maintenance/capital plans. Councillors questioned the after-dark program discontinuation. No motions on the presentation itself; documents received. - Bond order for roof replacements ($1,200,000): Authorized borrowing to repair roofs at West, Center, and South schools, replacing previous unacted bonds. Approved 8-0. - Snow removal fund transfer ($2,350,000): Transferred from free cash to cover winter 2025-2026 shortfall (total costs $3.2M). Approved 8-0. - Community Preservation fund transfers: Reallocated leftover funds from closed projects (housing, historical preservation, cemetery restoration). Approved 8-0. Key Outcomes - Zoning amendment (mixed-use GB): Remains in committee pending information from Community Development and Conservation Commission. - ADU ordinance: Amended and sent to Planning Board with two changes (setback reference and fala language). - Special permit for Lavish Beauty Bar: Approved 9-0. - Special permit for Five Star Rims expansion: Approved 8-1 (Councillor Corvo dissenting) with 15 conditions including safety/parking plans and coordination with condo association. - Bond order for roofs: Approved 8-0. - Snow removal transfer: Approved 8-0. - CP fund transfers: Approved 8-0. - Referrals: Multiple communications sent to legal affairs and other committees.

The Peabody Planning Board met on May 7, 2026, to consider site plan review applications, a jurisdictional determination for a group home, and other routine matters. The board unanimously approved the prior meeting's minutes, accepted late-filed materials, and continued two major site plan applications to future meetings. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes (April 16, 2026): Unanimously approved by roll call vote. - Late Ads Accepted: For the 532 Lowell Street application, the board accepted a memo from Community Development Director Kurt Bellavance (dated May 6, 2026) and a letter from MassDOT (dated May 5, 2026) regarding encroachments on state right-of-way. Public Comments & Testimony - 303 Wall Street (Group Home): Several residents spoke in opposition to the proposed group home and expressed concern about two structures on one lot. Speakers noted the project had already drawn unusual public attendance and urged the board to consider neighborhood impacts. Residents also questioned whether future subdivision applications could circumvent planning board oversight. The board acknowledged these concerns but noted the application had been withdrawn and was no longer under its jurisdiction. - 532 Lowell Street (Dental Clinic): No public testimony was offered beyond board member questions. - 81 Prospect Street (Veterinary Clinic): No public testimony was offered beyond board member questions. Discussion Items 303 Wall Street (MAP 62 Lot 007) – Group Home - Community Development Director Andrew said that under Massachusetts General Law, group homes are considered single-family homes and are exempt from site plan review per the city zoning ordinance. The city solicitor concurred that the planning board lacked jurisdiction. - Applicant's attorney, Attorney Kelty, acknowledged the board's lack of jurisdiction and requested withdrawal of the application without prejudice. - The board voted unanimously (7-0) to allow withdrawal without prejudice. Members expressed frustration that state law precluded review of a project that had generated significant neighborhood concern. 532 Lowell Street (MAP 35 Lot 28) – Dental Clinic - Presented by Rick Salvo of Engineering Alliance and Attorney Kelty. The proposal would convert a former Subway restaurant into a dental office with a 1,500 sq ft addition, 16 on-site parking spaces (down from 23 due to MassDOT encroachment), and new stormwater management. - MassDOT’s letter identified 7 existing parking spaces on state right-of-way that must be removed. The applicant holds a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals for 15 spaces. - Community Development noted concerns about inadequate landscaping (applicant committed to provide a plan), proximity to a planned bike path (MassDOT and city engineers reviewing), and required stormwater improvements. - Board members questioned parking adequacy (8 employees, 12 dental chairs, patient drop-off patterns), fire truck access (4 ft side setback), and the need for a traffic study waiver. - Director Kurt Bellavance updated the board on the bike path project (advertising for bids August 3, 2026) and potential encroachments. - The board unanimously voted to continue the application to the next regular meeting (scheduled for May 21, 2026) to allow receipt of Department of Public Services review and revised plans. 81 Prospect Street (MAP 39 Lot 6B) – Veterinary Clinic - Presented by Nick Betts of Merlin Associates and architect Chris Kidd. The project would demolish three existing buildings (total 10,000 sq ft) and construct a single 5,900 sq ft veterinary clinic with 24 parking spaces, new retaining walls, stormwater system, and landscaping. - The site had previously received Zoning Board of Appeals variances for building setbacks due to steep slopes. Existing stormwater currently sheet flows onto Prospect Street; the proposal includes catch basins and a connection to the city storm drain. - Board members discussed stormwater design capacity (catch basins sized for heavy rain), snow storage areas (grasses planted where snow will pile), sidewalk improvements (120 ft), and the need for a pad-mounted transformer if electrical load exceeds 600 amps. - The project is subject to peer review by the Department of Public Services, with no review results available. The board also requested a copy of the bike path construction plans to assess potential conflicts. - The board unanimously voted to continue the application to the June 4, 2026 meeting to allow completion of DPS review and further refinement of plans. Other Business - Appointments: None. - Subdivision Board Action: None. - Documentation: A letter from the Attorney General's office (dated April 17, 2026) regarding zoning relationships was acknowledged and accepted by the board. Key Outcomes - Approval of Minutes: April 16, 2026 minutes approved unanimously. - 303 Wall Street Withdrawal: Application withdrawn without prejudice (7-0). - 532 Lowell Street Continuance: Continued to May 21, 2026 (unanimous). - 81 Prospect Street Continuance: Continued to June 4, 2026 (unanimous). - Late Ads Accepted: Memo from Community Development and MassDOT letter accepted for 532 Lowell Street.