⬚ figure
SACRAMENTO 2040 GENERAL PLAN
PART 1
Introduction to the 2040 General Plan and Sustainability and Equity
⬚ figure
Prepared for: City of SACRAMENTO
Prepared by: DYETT & BHATIA Urban and Regional Planners
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
Introduction to the 2040 General Plan and Sustainability and Equity
⬚ figure
Prepared for: City of SACRAMENTO
Prepared by: DYETT & BHATIA Urban and Regional Planners
⬚ figure
Sacramento Profile .................................................................................................................................................. 1-2 Scope and Purpose of the General Plan ............................................................................................................ 1-3 Planning Area ............................................................................................................................................................ 1-6 Planning Context ...................................................................................................................................................... 1-9 General Plan Update Process ...............................................................................................................................1-11 Vision ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1-14 General Plan Organization.................................................................................................................................... 1-15 How to Use the General Plan............................................................................................................................... 1-18
Recent City Initiatives.............................................................................................................................................. 2-2 Indicators.................................................................................................................................................................... 2-2
Map 1-1: Regional Location............................................................................................................................................... 1-7 Map 1-2: Planning Area..................................................................................................................................................... 1-8
Figure 1-1: General Plan Pyramid ................................................................................................................................... 1-3
Table 1-1: Correspondence Between State-Mandated Elements and General Plan Chapters .......................... 1-5 Table 1-2: Policy Index..................................................................................................................................................... 1-19 Table 2-1: Indicators ........................................................................................................................................................... 2-3
⬚ figure
Sacramento is a diverse and welcoming city with a rich history, strategic location within the Central Valley, and a bright future. The city is a historic community deeply rooted in the story of California and a dynamic modern destination that is a regional hub for business, arts, culture, and innovation. Sacramento is one of the fastest growing cities in California, located in one of the most livable regions in the U.S.
Looking to the future, Sacramento is projected to add 69,000 new homes and 77,000 new jobs by 2040. For the community to continue to flourish, Sacramento will need to ensure that this growth happens in ways that are both sustainable and equitable. This will mean promoting a compact development pattern with new growth strategically concentrated to support efficient delivery of public services and infrastructure and to reduce vehicle miles traveled and greenhouse gas emissions. Equally, it will require a focus on fostering complete neighborhoods that provide for residents' daily needs within easy walking or biking distance from home and that offer a range of housing types to suit the needs of people of all ages and at all stages of life. It will also mean building community resilience in the face of climate change, forging inclusive economic development, and taking action to address the inequities of past practices so that everyone has an opportunity to achieve their full potential in Sacramento. In rising to meet these challenges and turning them into opportunities for an even brighter future, the Sacramento 2040 General Plan seeks to foster a more sustainable, equitable, and prosperous city for all.
The capital of California since 1854, Sacramento is a modern city and the metropolis of a region that encompasses El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo, and Yuba counties. Its location in the fertile Central Valley at the confluence of the Sacramento and American Rivers allowed farming, food processing, and transportation to play a pivotal role in the early development of the community. Today, food and agriculture continue to be important drivers of the local economy. Increasingly, innovation and technology are shaping economic and community development in Sacramento and there is a growing number of companies involved in high-tech manufacturing, software development, biotechnology, and medical research. The city is home to numerous top-ranked post-secondary educational institutions that are valuable contributors of ideas and talent, and it is an important regional transportation hub, served by an international airport, a deep-water shipping port, two major interstate freeways, freight and passenger rail lines, and an extensive regional commuter bus and light rail system.
Sacramento has a diverse and growing population. The city has seen sustained population growth over decades, and between 2010 and 2020, Sacramento added 44,000 new residents, a robust increase over a period that includes the Great Recession years. This growth has been fueled in large part by an out-migration from the San Francisco Bay Area spurred by rapidly rising housing costs and accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Immigration from overseas also contributes, with new residents arriving from Asia, Central America, and Europe, with Mexico, the Philippines, India, China, Ukraine, and Russia chief among them. In 2020, nearly 55 percent of the population identified as Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC), non-white. Between 2010 and 2020, population increased to approximately 500,000, but the age composition stayed roughly the same. Sacramento boasts a rich cultural offering too, home to an active and historic Downtown, numerous world-class performing arts venues and professional sports teams, and a burgeoning creative arts scene. The walkable streets and historic homes of Midtown attract visitors to Sacramento, and riverfront open spaces offer an array of recreational activities and amenities.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
The 2040 General Plan was adopted in compliance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 65300. The General Plan is a legal document and much of its content is established by statutory requirements relating to background data, analysis, maps, and exhibits. The legal adequacy of the General Plan is critical, since many City actions and programs are required to be consistent with the General Plan.
California Government Code section 65300 requires each city and county to adopt a General Plan “for the physical development of the county or city, and any land outside its boundaries which... bears relation to its planning.” The Sacramento General Plan can be considered a blueprint for development and conservation — a set of policies that guide the City’s land use and capital investment decisions for the next two decades. The Sacramento General Plan serves to:
Due to the broad and long-range nature of the General Plan, there will be instances where more detailed studies will be necessary to implement the General Plan’s policies, as illustrated in Figure I-1.
⬚ figure
California grants local authorities power over land use decisions. As a result, cities have considerable flexibility in preparing their general plans so long as State requirements are met. The California Government Code establishes both the content of general plans and rules for their adoption and subsequent amendment. Together, state law and judicial decisions establish three overall guidelines for general plans. General plans should be:
The Sacramento General Plan contains four parts: Part 1: Introduction to the 2040 General Plan and Sustainability and Equity; Part 2: Citywide Goals and Policies; Part 3: Community Plans and Special Study Areas; and Part 4: Administration and Implementation. As shown on Table I-1, the General Plan covers all eight “elements” required under state law — land use, circulation, housing, conservation, open space, noise, safety, and environmental justice — in addition to several optional elements of local importance to the community, including economic development, and historic and cultural resources. All elements, regardless of whether they are mandatory or optional, carry equal weight.
Housing Elements are required by state law to be updated more frequently than the General Plan, and to facilitate that, the City publishes its Housing Element under a separate cover. The City of Sacramento Housing Element was most recently adopted in 2021, and will be next updated in 2029, consistent with the State-defined cycle. State law also requires that implementation of the General Plan be “vertically” consistent, meaning all actions related to zoning, subdivision approval, housing allocations, and capital improvements must be consistent with the General Plan.
⬚ figure
| Part/Chapter | State Required Elements | Optional Elements |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1: Introduction to the 2040 General Plan and Sustainability and Equity | ||
| 1. Introduction | -- | |
| 2. Sustainability and Equity | -- | |
| Part 2: Citywide Goals and Policies | ||
| 3. Land Use and Placemaking | Land Use | |
| 4. Historic and Cultural Resources | -- | Historic Preservation |
| 5. Economic Development | -- | Economic Development |
| 6. Environmental Resources and Constraints | Conservation, Noise, Safety (Hazards) | Air Quality |
| 7. Environmental Justice | Environmental Justice | Air Quality, Community Health |
| 8. Mobility | Circulation (Transportation) | |
| 9. Public Facilities and Safety | Circulation (Utilities/Facilities), Safety (Fire/Emergency) | |
| 10. Youth, Parks, Recreation, & Open Space | Open Space | |
| Part 3: Community Plans and Special Study Areas | ||
| 11. Community Plans & Special Study Areas | -- | |
| Part 4: Administration and Implementation | ||
| 12. Implementation | ||
| Appendices | ||
| Appendix A: Vision & Guiding Principles | ||
| Appendix B: Glossary & Acronyms | ||
| Appendix C: Photograph/Illustration Credits |
Sacramento is located in the northern part of the Central Valley, roughly halfway between San Francisco to the west and Lake Tahoe to the east. Major highways providing regional access to and through Sacramento include Interstate 80 and U.S. Highway 50 (east/west), and Interstate 5 and U.S. Highway 99 (north/south). Amtrak serves Sacramento’s passenger rail needs, while Sacramento International Airport provides domestic and international flights through most major airlines. Within the city and surrounding region, Sacramento Regional Transit (SacRT) is the primary transit provider of bus and light rail service. The regional location of the planning area is shown on Map I-1.
The planning area is defined as the land area addressed by the General Plan, including land within City limits, the Sphere of Influence (SOI) outside City limits, and Special Study Areas; all of which are subsequently discussed. The planning area comprises approximately 113,572 acres (197 square miles) of incorporated and unincorporated land, encompassing land within City limits, the SOI, and five special study areas as shown on Map I-2. The planning area boundary was determined in response to state law, which requires each city to include all territory within the boundaries of the incorporated area as well as “any land outside its boundaries which in the planning agency’s judgement bears relation to its planning,”1 within the general plan planning area. While the City only has jurisdiction within City limits, it can establish future land use and zoning in the SOI to indicate desired uses and intensity in the event of future annexation.
The City limits encompasses approximately 64,425 acres (101 square miles) of incorporated land within the legal jurisdiction of the City of Sacramento. The existing uses within the City limits include residential, commercial, and industrial developments, as well as public facilities including parks, schools, and hospitals.
⬚ figure
The SOI is an area outside of Sacramento’s jurisdictional boundary, or City limits, that designates the City’s probable future boundary and service area. Sacramento’s SOI encompasses 14,018 acres (22 square miles) outside of City limits. The Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) has jurisdiction over defining Sacramento’s SOI and acts on annexations and the approval of service contracts outside City limits. The purpose of the SOI is to coordinate and shape logical and orderly development while discouraging urban sprawl and the premature conversion of agricultural and open space lands by preventing overlapping jurisdictions and duplication of services. While the LAFCo cannot tell agencies what their planning goals should be, on a regional level, the LAFCo for each California county helps coordinate efficient provision of services for the benefit of area residents and property owners.
The planning area also includes five special study areas: the Natomas Basin Study Area, the Arden Arcade Study Area, the East Study Area, the Fruitridge/Florin Study Area, and the Town of Freeport Study Area. These are unincorporated locations adjacent to City limits where careful coordination between the City and the County is required to plan for natural resource protection and the efficient delivery of services. Collectively, the special study areas total approximately 47,610 acres (74 square miles), approximately 74 percent of which lies outside City limits and the SOI.
1 California Government Code Section 65300. ↩
Map I-1
⬚ figure
Map I-2
⬚ figure
| ![symbol] | Sacramento City Limit |
| ![symbol] | Sphere of Influence |
| ![symbol] | Special Study Areas |
| ![symbol] | County Boundary |
| ![symbol] | Airports |
| ● | Existing Light Rail Station |
| ○ | Proposed Light Rail Station |
| ![symbol] | Existing Light Rail Line |
| ![symbol] | Proposed Light Rail Extension |
| ![symbol] | Highways |
| ![symbol] | Major Roads |
| ![symbol] | Railroads |
| ![symbol] | Water |
Source: City of Sacramento GIS, 2023; Dyett & Bhatia, 2023
⬚ figure
Aerial view of Southern Pacific Railroad passenger station, ca. 1925-1926
Sacramento’s early and modern settlements were shaped by its geographic features, including the Sacramento and American rivers, and its verdant flora and fauna. The Sacramento Valley was first settled by Nisenan (Southern Maidu) and Plains Miwok Native Americans. Archaeological and linguistic studies show that the region’s earliest inhabitants were hunter-gatherers who subsisted on acorns, seeds, and other plants, as well as land animals and fish; they practiced religion, built villages with distinct architecture, and manufactured a wide variety of tools and crafts.
European exploration into the Sacramento Valley began in the early 1800s via colonization and the establishment of missions. One of these explorers, a Spaniard name Gabriel Moraga is responsible for naming the valley region “Sacramento,” which means “the Holy Sacrament.” In 1839, John Sutter established Sutter’s Fort on a land grant from the Mexican government, in what was, at the time, Nisenan territory.
After the discovery of gold in the Sierras, Sacramento quickly became a transportation hub for prospectors and supplies on their way to the gold fields. Sutter had an official plan for the city prepared and the citizens of Sacramento adopted a City charter in 1849. In 1850, Sacramento became the first incorporated city in California. During the California Gold Rush and through the 1800s, the city’s location along the river ports, and later the railroad, played a prominent role in making Sacramento a major distribution point; a commercial and agricultural center; a terminus for wagon trains, stagecoaches, riverboats, the telegraph, the Pony Express, and the First Transcontinental Railroad; and in 1854, the state capital of California. Rail expansion continued in the late 19th century and early 20th century, facilitating local as well as regional travel. Battery operated streetcars were introduced in 1891, and in an era before the automobile, development of the city’s first suburbs followed streetcar lines. By 1911, Sacramento had eight streetcar lines. The “streetcar suburbs” to the east and south, including Land Park, Curtis Park, Oak Park, Tahoe Park and East Sacramento, had an estimated population of 15,000 and were annexed into the City, thereby tripling the city’s land area.
Following World War II, Sacramento began a period of unprecedented growth aided by the growing post-war economy, strong housing demand, and the national trend toward suburbanization. From 1946 to 1970, the City of Sacramento added nearly 60,000 acres of land in the Natomas, Northgate, Gardenland, and North Sacramento areas, expanding almost seven times its 1945 size of just over 9,000 acres. This massive post-war expansion was made possible by the dramatic growth in automobile ownership and the development of freeways, such as Interstates 80 and 5 and U.S. 50, which allowed
quick travel to once outlying areas. The freeways, however, also disrupted existing neighborhoods and displaced residents, as land was cleared for this new infrastructure and new barriers were created between historically connected neighborhoods. With the advent of the automobile, neighborhoods became less dense and blocks grew larger, scaled to the speed of a car rather than the pedestrian. Land uses became more segregated, increasing Sacramento’s car dependence. As many residents moved out to the new suburbs, retailers followed them and built a new kind of development suited to the suburban lifestyle: the shopping mall. In 1954, Sacramento’s first large shopping mall, Country Club Shopping Center, opened. This was soon followed by others such as Southgate and Florin Center and then by smaller strip malls along commercial corridors in subsequent decades.
Annexation of the Pocket and the Natomas areas led to significant population growth throughout the 1970s, ‘80s, ‘90s and into the early 2000s. In tandem with post-war suburban development, redevelopment in Downtown Sacramento resulted in a dramatic decrease in population. Urban renewal projects saw properties condemned as “blighted.” These properties were expropriated from homeowners and tenants in order to facilitate demolition, which effectively removed entire non-White communities from the downtown area, particularly the West End (an area west of the State Capitol redeveloped in the 1950s/60s). However, revisions to the Capitol Area Plan in 1977 and 1997 ushered in new mixed-use and residential developments that have helped revitalize the central city. The expansion of the light rail system in the mid-2000s has also created new opportunities for transit-oriented development along extensions of the SacRT Blue and Gold Lines. More recently, the advent of online shopping and e-commerce have resulted in a reduced demand for physical retail space, and there are opportunities to reimagine some older shopping centers.
⬚ figure
Smart growth principles have long been central to long-range planning in Sacramento. In 1988, the City adopted a General Plan that laid out a set of smart growth principles to guide sustainable and balanced development that makes efficient and effective use of land resources and existing infrastructure. In 2009, a comprehensive update (2030 General Plan) carried these principles forward with a focus on promoting infill development and reuse of underutilized properties, as well as on intensifying development near transit and mixed-use activity centers. An important theme of the 2030 General Plan was “Living Lightly” and it incorporated strategies to reduce Sacramento’s carbon footprint as well as a program calling for the City to prepare and adopt a climate action plan, which was subsequently adopted in two phases in 2010 and 2012. A technical update to the General Plan was adopted in 2015 (the 2035 General Plan), which incorporated the Climate Action Plan into the General Plan and refreshed the Technical Background Report. The 2040 General Plan is the most current iteration of this comprehensive planning document.
In 2019, the City embarked on a comprehensive update of the General Plan to guide Sacramento in its next era of growth and development in a sustainable and equitable manner. The General Plan Update focused on updating policies and programs to reflect changed conditions and priorities and to address new state laws. Important cornerstones of the 2040 General Plan Update include a focus on Sacramento’s neighborhoods, a new environmental justice element as required by California Government Code 65302(h), and bold action to address an accelerating climate crisis. In parallel, a new Climate Action and Adaptation Plan was prepared to establish Sacramento as a leader in climate action.
The General Plan Update process involved four main phases. Phase 1 focused on identifying issues and opportunities to address in updating the General Plan and culminated in a Vision and Guiding Principles, adopted by City Council in November 2019, that describe Sacramento’s shared values and its aspirations for the future. Phase 2 explored key strategies necessary to achieve the vision. The strategies were refined through input from community members and decision-makers and distilled into a preferred plan concept and key strategies to guide preparation of the 2040 General Plan. Phase 3 saw the creation of draft goals, policies, and implementing actions based on the approved vision and key strategies from prior phases. Phase 4 involved public review of the draft documents, additional community outreach to raise awareness in the community and solicit feedback on the draft documents, and formal hearings before the Planning and Design Commission and the City Council prior to adoption of the plans and certification of the Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR).
⬚ figure
The update process involved the preparation of several documents: the Policy Document, Technical Background Report, and Master Environmental Impact Report.
Policy Document. The Policy Document is the essence of the General Plan. It contains the goals, policies, and implementing actions that will guide City decision-making and investments for the next two decades. The Policy Document was revised comprehensively to reflect extensive community input on issues, opportunities, and priorities as well as to address new state law.
Technical Background Report. Along with the Policy Document, the Technical Background Report will be part of the General Plan. This document does not represent adopted City policy, but it provides a profile and analysis of existing conditions and trends within Sacramento and the surrounding area as of 2018; it addresses several State planning law requirements for general plans; and it provides a foundation for policy in the Policy Document. It also serves as the environmental setting for the MEIR; however, it is not part of the MEIR. The Technical Background Report was published in November 2020 and is available on the City’s website.
In parallel with the General Plan Update, the City is also preparing a MEIR. The purpose of the MEIR is to identify and evaluate the potentially significant impacts that could occur as a result of the adoption and implementation of the 2040 General Plan, including cumulative effects, growth-inducing effects, and irreversible significant effects on the environment.
The City Council reviews and considers the MEIR during the General Plan Update process to understand the potential environmental implications associated with implementing the General Plan. The MEIR is not part of the General Plan; however, it is intended to streamline project-level California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review for subsequent projects that are consistent with the General Plan.
Additionally, the following supporting documents are incorporated by reference into the 2040 General Plan: the City of Sacramento Annex to the Sacramento County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP); and the Sacramento Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP), including the Vulnerability Assessment it contains. Copies of all referenced materials are available for review at the City of Sacramento Community Development Department and on the City’s website.
Community involvement was an integral and ongoing component of the General Plan Update process; a particular focus was on outreach to disadvantaged and linguistically isolated communities. The ideas and feedback gathered through the community outreach process directly informed the vision set forth in this General Plan and the strategies incorporated to achieve it. Major outreach efforts included:
⬚ figure
Scientific Survey: As part of Phase 2 outreach activities, a scientific survey was conducted by a professional polling firm to gauge support for the key strategies from a statistically valid sample of the population.
Phase 2 Community Plan Workshops: The second round of meetings on the Community Plan Areas were conducted virtually, given COVID-19 safety protocols. These meetings included an online interactive workshop series focused on neighborhood-specific strategies for each of the 10 Community Plan Areas.
Youth Engagement Program: Through a three-month long summer program, youth representatives developed an informational video and online questionnaire about Sacramento’s future approach to climate change issues, collecting more than 300 responses from local residents and helping to inform the early direction of the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan.
Environmental Justice Working Group: An Environmental Justice Working Group met throughout the planning process to provide insight on how historic practices have disproportionately impacted low-income and minority communities; share input on strategies for addressing these practices and their outcomes; and help refine policies and implementing actions related to environmental justice and equity for inclusion in the General Plan Update. The group was comprised of more than 25 representatives from community-based organizations, public agencies, and other participants who work to foster equity and inclusion within Sacramento.
Phase 4 Community Outreach: In Phase 4, the Public Review Draft of the General Plan was released for public review. To support the public review process, additional outreach was conducted to raise awareness in the community, build understanding of the content of the proposed plans, and solicit community feedback to present to City decision-makers. Phase 4 Community Outreach. Community engagement activities included webinars, a several months-long virtual open house, and pop-up events around the community with a focus on harder to reach areas.
Decision-Maker Meetings: Meetings with both the Planning and Design Commission and the City Council were held at key milestones in the process to report on progress and receive direction for the upcoming phase. Specific input was also sought from various commissions such as the Active Transportation Commission, Parks and Community Enrichment Commission, Preservation Commission, the Sacramento Youth Commission, and the Disabilities Advisory Commission.
⬚ figure
The guiding Vision of the General Plan, as adopted by City Council in November 2019, was crafted from extensive Phase 1 community input. The accompanying Guiding Principles can be found in Appendix A of the General Plan.
In 2040, the City of Sacramento will be a national model of sustainable, equitable growth and community development.
Sacramento will continue to be a dynamic regional center of culture, diversity, jobs, food, and beautiful parks and trees, and will cultivate inclusive access to opportunity and healthy living. The General Plan seeks to direct growth and change into commercial and transit corridors, building on the city’s existing assets and character. Pedestrian, bicycle and transit options will be prioritized over automobiles.
Every neighborhood will be a desirable place to live, with safe streets, extensive tree canopy, a range of housing choices, mixed-use neighborhood centers, great schools, parks and recreation facilities, and convenient connections to jobs, services, and nature. Every resident will feel the freedom to walk and bike safely and comfortably. Sacramento’s neighborhoods will be affordable and inclusive, and every resident will have the opportunity to thrive.
As California’s capital, Sacramento will continue to be a primary center for government, employment, education, and culture. The city’s economy will continue to strengthen, diversify, and participate in changing global industries.
Sacramento will be a leader in bold, equitable climate action and the green economy, taking steps to cut waste, pollution, and carbon emissions. Through its continued progress toward
⬚ figure
Sacramento’s 2045 climate neutrality goal, the city will also achieve other, interconnected goals: healthy, climate-safe homes, green spaces and tree canopy for all, an efficient zero-emissions transportation system, clean air, and a thriving, sustainable economy. Recognizing the future challenges of climate change, Sacramento will build resilience for all its communities, especially the most vulnerable.
Sacramento will ensure that residents of all ages and abilities have access to a range of reliable, environmentally responsible transportation options. Sacramento will invest in its aging infrastructure and prioritize carbon-neutral transport, and will have clean air, water, and “complete” streets. Sacramento will also invest in its human capital today, prioritizing investment in youth, the adults and leaders of 2040.
Sacramento will ensure the just and equitable treatment of all neighborhoods and people, address historical inequities, and ensure broad community participation and ownership in public processes, as well as accountability in implementing plans. Sacramento will continue to celebrate its cultural and ethnic diversity and will foster the arts, protect historic, cultural, and natural resources, and cultivate its extensive urban forest, parks and riverways.
⬚ figure
The 2040 General Plan addresses the eight state-mandated topics as well as several additional topics of local importance. The 2021-2029 Housing Element, which fulfills the state requirement for a certified housing element, was adopted in 2021 and published separately. The General Plan is organized into four parts, as follows:
Introduction. The Introduction contains the General Plan’s vision and guiding principles and an overview of its organization, and describes Sacramento’s regional location and planning boundaries, the planning process, how the 2040 General Plan relates to other plans and regulations, and how to use, revise, and amend the plan. This chapter also includes a policy index intended as a navigational aid to help users find policies and actions on key topics and themes quickly and easily.
Sustainability and Equity. This section discusses two themes that are integral to the 2040 General Plan and are woven throughout the General Plan: sustainability and equity. It includes a summary of key initiatives the City has already undertaken to address these themes. It also identifies a series of indicators that can be used to monitor toward the community wide objectives of the General Plan and help ensure that growth contributes incrementally to a more sustainable and equitable city.
The eight topical elements of the General Plan set out citywide goals and policies are as follows:
Land Use and Placemaking. This Element combines land use, a required topic by state law, and an additional topic that is a closely related priority for the community: placemaking. This Element describes the existing land use pattern and provides an explanation of the General Plan’s approach to citywide growth, presenting policies and standards for land use designations and development intensities, urban design, green building, arts, culture, and placemaking.
Historic and Cultural Resources. This Element covers historic and cultural resources, which is a topic of local importance. This Element describes preservation efforts to date, and presents policies for the preservation, adaptation, and reuse of historic and cultural resources.
Economic Development. This Element addresses a topic of local importance, providing an overview of the population and employment context in Sacramento, and outlining goals and policies to foster a dynamic local economy, innovation, business resilience, and inclusive economic development.
Environmental Resources and Constraints. This Element satisfies the legal requirements for addressing the topic of noise and identifies noise sources, quantifies future noise levels through a contour map, and establishes measures to address noise issues. It addresses the requirements for the conservation, including water, energy, vegetation, wildlife, and air to improve the environmental well-being of the community. It also addresses Safety Element requirements for community protection from wildfires, flooding, seismic events, dam inundation, and climate change.
Environmental Justice. This Element satisfies the legal requirements in planning for “disadvantaged communities” identified under Senate Bill (SB) 535 (2012, De Leon). Consistent with SB 1000 (2016), this element addresses the topics of air quality and pollution exposure; safe and sanitary homes; healthy food access; and civic engagement and investment prioritization.
Mobility. The Element satisfies the statutory requirements for the general plan circulation element in part, providing a circulation diagram that identifies the city’s major transportation routes and thoroughfares as well as a policy framework that seeks to balance walking, bicycling, transit service, and driving within an equitable, sustainable multimodal circulation system. It also addresses the regional movement of people and goods by road, rail, and air.
Public Facilities and Safety. This Element satisfies legal requirements for public safety related to urban fires as well as the location and extent of public utilities, including water, sewer, stormwater, and electricity. This Element also provides background information and a policy framework related to police and fire services, schools, and libraries.
Youth, Parks, Recreation, and Open Space. This Element satisfies the legal requirements for addressing open space for environmental and scenic conservation, as well as topics of community importance: youth, parks, and recreation.
⬚ figure
It includes background information and policies relating to youth programs, parks and recreation, and open space conservation and access.
Part 3 of the General Plan provides policy direction for ten Community Plan Areas and five Special Study Areas. This part of the General Plan contains policies and procedures for maintaining the Community Plans in a manner consistent with the citywide goals and policies. The introduction to Part 3 is organized as follows:
The ten Community Plans are as follows:
The five Special Study Areas are as follows:
The Administration and Implementation part of the General Plan contains procedures for maintaining and carrying out the General Plan in a systematic and consistent manner. The Administration and Implementation part of the General Plan is organized as follows:
Each element of this General Plan includes brief background information to establish the context for the goals and policies in the element. This background material is not a comprehensive statement of existing conditions. Each element also contains the goals, policies, and implementing actions that will be used by the City to guide future land use, development, and environmental protection decisions. Within this structure, Goals describe general desired results that the community seeks to create through the implementation of the General Plan. The Policies and Actions establish the “who,” “how,” and “when” for carrying out the “what” and “where” of Goals. Policies and implementing actions both support the Goals, described on the right.
The following information is contained in Appendices A–C:
Vision & Guiding Principles
Glossary & Acronyms
Photograph/Illustration Credits
A goal is statement that describes a desired future condition or “end” state. Goals are intended to be broad statements of community aspirations.
A policy is a clear and unambiguous statement that guides a specific course of action for decision-makers to achieve a desired goal. General Plan policies guide City staff and decision-makers in their review of land development projects and in decision-making about City actions.
An implementing action is a measure, procedure, or technique intended to implement one or more policies to help reach a specified goal. Typically, an action is a discrete item done once and completed. For implementing actions, this Plan lists both the timeframe and responsible department/agencies for implementation.
⬚ figure
The City’s General Plan is intended for use by all members of the community including residents, businesses, developers, City staff, and decision-makers. The organization of the 2040 General Plan allows users to find topics or sections that interest them and to quickly review City policies; although, users should be aware that the policies throughout all elements are interrelated and should be examined comprehensively and must be considered together when making planning decisions.
For Sacramento residents, the General Plan indicates the general types of uses that are permitted throughout the city, the long-range plans and actions that may affect neighborhoods, and the policies the City will use to evaluate development applications. The General Plan indicates how the City will attract businesses that provide goods and services to meet daily needs and new jobs that are closely matched to educational skills and that lessen the need to commute. The General Plan informs residents how the City plans to improve mobility and transportation infrastructure, continue to provide adequate public services, and protect valued open spaces and environmental resources. Cumulatively, the General Plan identifies the actions the City will take to foster a more sustainable, equitable, and prosperous city for all.
For Sacramento businesses, the General Plan outlines the measures the City will take to protect investments and encourage future success. Expectations for the city’s business areas are spelled out, while policies ensure that business operations will be compatible with other businesses and nearby residential areas.
For developers within the city, or those moving homes or businesses to the city, the General Plan introduces the community, provides background information, and outlines development regulations. It is important to review all maps and policies throughout this General Plan and the Sacramento Planning and Development Code to get a complete perspective on how and where development may take place.
The General Plan is also a tool to help City staff, the Planning & Design Commission, other boards and commissions, and the City Council make land use and public investment decisions. Future development decisions must be consistent with the General Plan. Finally, the General Plan is also intended to help other public agencies, from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG), to local school districts, as they contemplate future actions in and around Sacramento.
Many of the issues central to the 2040 General Plan cut across topics and, as such, are addressed in more than one Element. To help the user find policies and implementing actions related to these central themes quickly and easily, Table 1-2 summarizes them in an index organized by central themes. Under each topic, the related policy/action number is shown at left, with a short description of the policy/action content at right. Policy/Action numbers are keyed to the Element in which they appear.
⬚ figure
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| Active Transportation Network | |
| LUP-1.1 | Compact Urban Footprint |
| LUP-2.2 | Interconnected City |
| LUP-2.5 | Design for Connectivity |
| LUP-4.1 | Transit-Supportive Development |
| LUP-4.9 | Enhanced Pedestrian Environment |
| LUP-4.10 | Multi-Modal Access |
| LUP-5.2 | Shopping Centers as Focal Points |
| LUP-5.3 | Mixed-Use Neighborhood Centers |
| LUP-8.1 | Unique Sense of Place |
| LUP-8.9 | People-Friendly Design |
| AA-LUP-1 | Cal Expo |
| CC-LUP-8 | Temporary Alley Closures |
| SA-LUP-4 | Corridor Revitalization |
| M-1.1 | Street Classification System |
| M-1.2 | User Prioritization |
| M-1.3 | Healthy Transportation System Options |
| M-1.4 | Designing to Move People |
| M-1.5 | Street Design Standards |
| M-1.6 | Transit Integration |
| M-1.7 | Fine-Grained Network |
| M-1.8 | Vacation of Public Right-of-Way |
| M-1.11 | Increase Bicycling and Walking |
| M-1.12 | Light Rail Transit (LRT) Station Access Improvements |
| M-1.13 | Walkability |
| M-1.14 | Walking Facilities |
| M-1.15 | Improve Walking Connectivity |
| M-1.16 | Barrier Removal |
| M-1.17 | Improve Bicycling Connectivity |
| M-1.18 | Bicycling Safety |
| M-1.19 | Walking Safety |
| M-2.9 | Advocacy and Events |
| M-2.10 | Curbside Management |
| M-3.2 | Street Design |
| M-4.1 | Application of Safety |
| M-4.2 | Safer Driving Speeds |
| M-4.3 | Vision Zero |
| M-4.4 | Collaborative Safety Solutions |
| M-4.5 | Safety-Related Training |
| NS-M-5 | High-Frequency Transit |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| M-4.8 | Detour Facilities |
| M-4.9 | Safe Routes to School |
| M-A.7 | Roadway Reallocations |
| M-A.9 | Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Ordinance |
| ES-M-1 | Sacramento State Pedestrian Connections |
| ES-TV-2 | Local Mobility Improvements |
| NS-M-1 | Roadway Reallocations |
| NS-M-2 | Bicycle Resources |
| PG-M-1 | Transit Connections |
| SN-M-3 | American River Parkway Connections |
| YPRO-1.15 | Path Connections |
| YPRO-1.16 | River Parkways |
| YPRO-2.3 | School Facilities |
| YPRO-2.4 | Library Services |
| YPRO-3.3 | Health Programming and Events |
| ES-YPRO-2 | Two Rivers Trail |
| FB-YPRO-3 | Granite Regional Park Pedestrian Access |
| FB-YPRO-4 | George Sim Park Access |
| LP-YPRO-3 | City Cemetery Pedestrian Access |
| SA-YPRO-2 | Franklin Boyce Park Access |
| SA-YPRO-3 | Joint Use Agreements |
| SN-YPRO-6 | Connections to East Levee Road Trails |
| Aesthetics | |
| LUP-4.6 | Compatibility with Adjoining Uses |
| LUP-4.7 | Visual and Physical Character |
| LUP-4.15 | Vacant Property |
| LUP-4.16 | Compatibility Between Light Industrial and Residential Uses |
| LUP-5.1 | Evolving Regional Commercial Centers |
| LUP-6.4 | Neighborhood Form |
| LUP-6.5 | Established Neighborhoods |
| LUP-6.7 | Architectural Variations |
| LUP-7.5 | Industrial Aesthetics |
| LUP-8.1 | Unique Sense of Place |
| LUP-8.6 | Prominent Corner Architecture |
| LUP-8.7 | Distinctive Urban Skyline |
| LUP-8.8 | Iconic Sense of Place |
| LUP-8.9 | People-Friendly Design |
| LUP-8.10 | Responsiveness to Context |
| LUP-8.11 | Neighborhood and Transitions |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| LUP-8.13 | Continuity of Streetscape Design |
| LUP-8.14 | Streetscape Beautification |
| LUP-8.15 | Setbacks from Rivers and Creeks |
| SN-LUP-5 | Riverfront Landscaping |
| LUP-A.12 | Design Guidelines Update |
| NN-LUP-2 | Commercial Center Placemaking |
| NN-LUP-5 | Open Space Buffers |
| SN-LUP-2 | Northgate Boulevard Placemaking |
| PG-ED-1 | Freeport Boulevard Revitalization |
| HCR-1.7 | Contextual Features |
| HCR-1.3 | Compatibility with Historic Context |
| HCR-1.1 | Preservation of Historic and Cultural Resources, Landscapes, and Site Features |
| HCR-1.11 | Energy Retrofits of Historic Resources |
| YPRO-1.24 | Welcoming Amenities |
| YPRO-1.26 | Maintenance of Existing Facilities |
| SN-YPRO-6 | Connections to East Levee Road Trails |
| Air Quality | |
| LUP-1.1 | Compact Urban Footprint |
| LUP-1.7 | Regional Growth Strategy |
| LUP-6.12 | Reconnecting Communities |
| HCR-1.19 | Access to Energy Retrofits |
| ERC-4.1 | Regional Coordination |
| ERC-4.2 | Air Quality Awareness |
| ERC-4.3 | Project Design |
| ERC-4.4 | Sensitive Uses |
| ERC-4.5 | Construction Emissions |
| ERC-4.6 | Gas-Powered Landscaping Equipment |
| ERC-4.7 | Operational Emissions |
| ERC-10.8 | Alternative Paving Materials |
| ERC-A.6 | Landscape Maintenance Ordinance |
| EJ-1.1 | Air Quality Monitoring |
| EJ-1.2 | Community Air Protection |
| EJ-1.3 | Data-Informed Efforts |
| EJ-1.4 | Impact Assessment |
| EJ-A.2 | Air Filtration Systems |
| EJ-A.5 | Amortization Ordinance |
| EJ-A.6 | Performance Zoning |
| AA-EJ-1 | Tree Planting in Parking Lots |
| M-1.27 | Electric Vehicle (EV) Strategy |
| M-1.28 | Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Capital |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| M-1.29 | Shared Zero-Emission Vehicles (ZEVs) |
| M-1.30 | Public Electric Vehicle (EV) Infrastructure Deployment |
| M-1.31 | Private Electric Vehicle (EV) Infrastructure Deployment |
| M-1.33 | Electric Vehicle (EV) Car Share and Electric Bike Share |
| M-1.34 | Electric Mobility (E-Mobility) Hubs |
| M-1.35 | Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV) First |
| M-1.36 | Electric Vehicles in New Development |
| M-1.37 | Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging in Existing Development |
| M-1.38 | Electric Vehicles (EVs), and Energy Resiliency |
| M-5.6 | Goods Movement Facilities |
| M-5.7 | Zero-Emission Fleets |
| M-5.8 | Zero-Emission Delivery |
| M-5.12 | Zero-Emission Aircraft |
| CC-M-2 | Employee Parking |
| City-Sponsored Educational Resources | |
| LUP-9.1 | Cultural and Entertainment Centers |
| LUP-9.5 | Arts Education |
| LUP-11.4 | Community Education |
| HCR-1.3 | Compatibility with Historic Context |
| HCR-1.4 | Historic Districts |
| HCR-1.5 | Historic Surveys and Context Statements |
| HCR-1.13 | Indigenous Cultures |
| HCR-1.14 | Archaeological, Tribal, and Cultural Resources |
| HCR-1.16 | Endemic Traditions |
| HCR-1.17 | Evaluation of Archaeological Resources |
| HCR-A.4 | Historic Context Statements and Survey |
| HCR-A.8 | Conditions for Resource Discovery |
| HCR-A.9 | Native American Cultural Resources |
| LP-HCR-1 | Greater Land Park Historic Resources |
| NN-HCR-1 | Preservation of the Witter Ranch Historic Farm |
| E-1.5 | Technical Assistance |
| E-2.6 | Sustainable Business Programs |
| E-2.7 | Small Business/Startup Support |
| E-2.10 | Business-to-Business Commerce |
| E-4.5 | Labor Force Skills Development |
| E-4.8 | Entrepreneurship and Social Enterprise Training |
| E-4.9 | New Graduate Workforce Integration |
| E-A.1 | Prioritizing Digital Skills Training |
| E-A.2 | Aligning Education and Training |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| E-A.3 | Paid and Volunteer Job Programs |
| E-A.4 | Life-Long Learning |
| E-A.6 | Workforce Preparedness Program |
| ERC-2.4 | Native and Climate-Adapted Plants |
| ERC-2.5 | Environmental Awareness |
| ERC-3.8 | Public Education |
| ERC-4.2 | Air Quality Awareness |
| ERC-5.5 | Publicize Voluntary Programs |
| ERC-8.7 | Extreme Heat Education |
| ERC-8.8 | Heat Waves |
| ERC-A.2 | Tree Education |
| ERC-A.3 | CERT Training |
| EJ-1.10 | Education |
| EJ-5.1 | Equity Education |
| M-1.27 | Electric Vehicle (EV) Strategy |
| M-2.6 | Transit/Event Coordination |
| PFS-2.8 | Emergency Preparedness Programs |
| PFS-5.7 | Organic Waste Collection Services |
| YPRO-3.2 | Health Information |
| AA-YPRO-1 | Del Paso Regional Park Educational Programs |
| Climate Adaptation and Resiliency | |
| LUP-1.1 | Compact Urban Footprint |
| LUP-4.14 | Elimination of Vehicle Parking Minimums |
| LUP-11.3 | Local Human and Ecological Context |
| LUP-A.6 | Future High-Frequency Transit Routes |
| LUP-A.8 | Beyond Climate Resiliency Measures |
| LUP-A.9 | Net-Zero Energy or Net-Positive Design |
| LUP-A.10 | Planning and Development Code Update |
| HCR-1.11 | Energy Retrofits and Historic Resources |
| HCR-1.19 | Access to Energy Retrofits |
| E-2.6 | Sustainable Business Programs |
| ERC-2.4 | Native and Climate-Adapted Plants |
| ERC-2.6 | Wetland Protection |
| ERC-2.7 | Annual Grasslands |
| ERC-2.8 | Wildlife Corridors |
| ERC-2.9 | Habitat Assessments |
| ERC-2.10 | Agency Coordination |
| ERC-2.11 | Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan |
| ERC-2.12 | Support Habitat Conservation Plan Efforts |
| ERC-2.13 | Climate Change-related Habitat Shifts |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| ERC-2.14 | Climate Change-related Habitat Restoration and Enhancement |
| ERC-3.10 | Parking Lot Shading |
| ERC-3.11 | Planting |
| ERC-5.6 | Renewable Energy |
| ERC-9.5 | Climate Change Assessment and Monitoring |
| ERC-9.6 | Resiliency Hubs |
| ERC-9.7 | Emergency Power |
| ERC-9.8 | Microgrid Energy Systems |
| ERC-9.9 | Onsite Alternative Energy Creation |
| ERC-9.11 | Neighborhood Resilience |
| ERC-9.12 | Regenerative Food System |
| ERC-A.4 | Heat Reduction in the Public Realm |
| ERC-A.5 | Bus Shelter Design |
| ERC-A.7 | Cooling Landscape Standards |
| ERC-A.8 | Heat Resilient Design Techniques |
| ERC-A.10 | Parking Lot Shading Ordinance |
| M-1.27 | Electric Vehicle (EV) Strategy |
| M-1.28 | Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Capital |
| M-1.29 | Shared Zero-Emission Vehicles (ZEVs) |
| M-1.30 | Public Electric Vehicle (EV) Infrastructure Deployment |
| M-1.31 | Private Electric Vehicle (EV) Infrastructure Deployment |
| M-1.32 | Supportive Infrastructure in the Public Right-of-Way |
| M-1.33 | Electric Vehicle (EV) Car Share and Electric Bike Share |
| M-1.34 | Electric Mobility (E-Mobility) Hubs |
| M-1.35 | Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV) First |
| M-1.36 | Electric Vehicles in New Development |
| M-1.37 | Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging in Existing Development |
| M-1.38 | Electric Vehicles (EVs) and Energy Resiliency |
| M-2.3 | Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as Metric |
| M-2.4 | Shared Shuttles |
| M-2.5 | Onsite Childcare |
| M-2.6 | Transit/Event Coordination |
| M-2.14 | Parking Supply |
| M-2.15 | Incentives for Zero-Emission Vehicles (ZEVs) |
| M-2.16 | Shared Parking |
| M-2.17 | Parking Management Strategy |
| M-2.18 | Technology to Optimize Parking Utilization |
| M-2.19 | Optimizing Residential Utilization |
| M-5.7 | Zero-Emission Fleets |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| M-5.8 | Zero Emission Delivery |
| M-5.12 | Zero-Emission Aircraft |
| M-A.5 | Regional Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Mitigation |
| M-A.9 | Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Ordinance |
| YPRO-1.20 | Climate Resilient Design |
| YPRO-3.8 | Cooling Centers |
| SN-YPRO-6 | Connections to East Levee Road Trails |
| Climate Change Mitigation | |
| LUP-1.1 | Compact Urban Footprint |
| LUP-4.13 | Future-Ready Gas Stations |
| LUP-10.1 | Existing Structure Reuse |
| LUP-10.2 | Promote Green Buildings |
| LUP-11.1 | Net Positive Energy Future |
| LUP-11.2 | Balanced Local Water Cycle |
| LUP-11.7 | Building Materials |
| LUP-11.8 | Construction Processes |
| LUP-11.9 | Product Circularity |
| LUP-11.10 | Demonstration and Leadership |
| LUP-A.7 | Sustainability and Decarbonization Standards |
| LUP-A.10 | Planning and Development Code Update |
| HCR-1.11 | Energy Retrofits of Historic Resources |
| ERC-2.2 | Biological Resources |
| ERC-2.3 | Onsite Preservation |
| ERC-2.4 | Native and Climate-Adapted Plants |
| ERC-2.13 | Climate Change-related Habitat Shifts |
| ERC-2.14 | Climate Change-related Habitat Restoration and Enhancement |
| ERC-3.10 | Parking Lot Shading |
| ERC-3.11 | Planting |
| ERC-5.6 | Renewable Energy |
| ERC-9.1 | Communitywide GHG Reduction |
| ERC-9.2 | Additional GHG Emissions Program |
| ERC-9.3 | Lead by Example in Design of Buildings |
| ERC-9.4 | Carbon-Neutral Buildings |
| EJ-3.2 | Supplemental Funding Sources for Building Rehabilitation |
| EJ-3.4 | Healthy Environment |
| PFS-3.2 | Utility Sustainability |
| PFS-3.9 | Methane Recovery |
| YPRO-1.19 | Sustainable Design |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| SA-YPRO-6 | Food-Anchored Resiliency Hubs |
| Community Engagement and Collaboration | |
| LUP-1.14 | Deed Notice |
| LUP-5.2 | Shopping Centers as Focal Points |
| LUP-9.3 | Assembly Facilities and Event Centers |
| LUP-11.5 | Human-Ecosystems Connection |
| LUP-11.6 | Community Connections |
| LUP-A.4 | Fruitridge-Florin Annexation |
| EJ-A.4 | Community-Led Planning |
| CC-LUP-2 | Local Retail |
| CC-LUP-3 | Old Sacramento Waterfront Community Uses |
| CC-LUP-4 | Old Sacramento Retail Visioning |
| CC-LUP-7 | Old Sacramento Cultural Arts District |
| NS-LUP-1 | Del Paso Boulevard Activation and Placemaking Improvements |
| NS-LUP-2 | Del Paso Creative Activation |
| NS-LUP-3 | Engage North of I-80 |
| SA-LUP-13 | Coordination |
| PG-ED-1 | Freeport Boulevard Revitalization |
| HCR-1.6 | Early Project Consultation |
| HCR-1.13 | Indigenous Cultures |
| HCR-1.15 | Treatment of Native American Human Remains |
| HCR-1.16 | Endemic Traditions |
| HCR-1.17 | Evaluation of Archeological Resources |
| E-1.6 | Growth in Opportunity Areas |
| E-2.2 | Access to Capital |
| E-2.3 | Neighborhood Development Action Team |
| E-2.8 | Public Procurement |
| E-2.9 | Local Pilot Projects |
| E-2.10 | Business-to-Business Commerce |
| E-A.3 | Paid and Volunteer Job Programs |
| E-A.4 | Life-Long Learning |
| E-A.6 | Workforce Preparedness Program |
| E-A.7 | Development Incentives |
| ERC-1.1 | Clean Water Programs |
| ERC-4.2 | Air Quality Awareness |
| ERC-5.5 | Publicize Voluntary Programs |
| EJ-1.2 | Community Air Protection |
| EJ-1.9 | Household Hazardous Waste Collection Programs |
| EJ-2.3 | Open Air Food Sales |
| EJ-2.4 | Expanded Reach of Food Distribution |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| EJ-2.5 | Food Assistance Programs |
| EJ-2.6 | Food Recovery Program |
| EJ-2.7 | Partner with Farmers |
| EJ-2.11 | Home-Based Food Enterprises |
| EJ-2.13 | Public-Private Partnerships |
| EJ-2.17 | Healthy Food Promotion |
| EJ-2.18 | Youth Food Literacy |
| EJ-2.19 | Farm-to-Fork |
| EJ-4.1 | Meaningful Relevant Engagement |
| EJ-4.2 | Innovative Methods |
| EJ-4.3 | Community Partners |
| EJ-4.4 | Capacity Building |
| EJ-4.5 | Increasing Participation of Underserved Communities |
| EJ-4.6 | Community Oversight |
| EJ-4.7 | Sustained Engagement |
| EJ-4.8 | Community Ownership and Accountability |
| EJ-A.1 | Retailer Incentive Program |
| NS-EJ-1 | Neighborhood Clean Up |
| NS-EJ-2 | Tree Planting |
| M-2.2 | Wider Participation |
| M-2.5 | Onsite Childcare |
| M-2.6 | Transit/Event Coordination |
| M-2.9 | Advocacy and Events |
| M-4.4 | Collaborative Safety Solutions |
| M-A.2 | Online Truck Maps |
| PFS-1.2 | Community-Based Policing |
| PFS-1.3 | Communication with Residents and Businesses |
| PFS-1.4 | Community Programs |
| PFS-2.9 | Neighborhood Preparedness |
| PFS-6.1 | Access and Availability |
| PFS-6.2 | Public/Private Collaboration |
| SA-PFS-2 | Community Relations |
| YPRO-1.14 | Collaborative Efforts |
| YPRO-1.22 | Community Input |
| YPRO-1.27 | Volunteer Programs |
| YPRO-2.6 | Community Partnerships |
| YPRO-3.3 | Health Programming and Events |
| YPRO-3.4 | Activity Programming |
| YPRO-A.1 | Youth, Parks, & Community Enrichment (YPCE) Parks Plan Update |
| YPRO-A.2 | Park Audits |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| YPRO-A.5 | Violence Prevention and Youth Development |
| CC-YPRO-3 | Sacramento River Waterfront Recreation and Access |
| LP-YPRO-1 | William Land Park Improvements |
| LP-YPRO-2 | Zoo Site Redevelopment |
| SA-YPRO-6 | Food-Anchored Resiliency Hubs |
| Environmental Hazards | |
| LUP-8.15 | Setbacks from Rivers and Creeks |
| NN-LUP-5 | Open Space Buffers |
| HCR-1.9 | Disaster Preparedness |
| HCR-1.19 | Access to Energy Retrofits |
| HCR-A.1 | Preservation Emergency Response |
| HCR-A.5 | Post-Disaster Plan |
| ERC-6.1 | Protection from Flood Hazards |
| ERC-6.2 | Flood Management Planning Coordination |
| ERC-6.3 | Floodway Capacity |
| ERC-6.4 | Floodplain Requirements |
| ERC-6.5 | Community Rating System |
| ERC-6.6 | Flood Regulations |
| ERC-6.7 | Flood Hazard Risk Evaluation |
| ERC-6.8 | Interagency Levee Management |
| ERC-6.9 | Levee and Floodway Encroachment Permit |
| ERC-6.10 | Levee Setbacks for New Development |
| ERC-6.11 | Unobstructed Access to Levees |
| ERC-6.12 | Flood Risk Notification |
| ERC-7.1 | Expansive Soils and Liquefaction |
| ERC-7.2 | Seismic Stability |
| ERC-8.1 | Cooling Design Techniques |
| ERC-8.2 | Large Heat Islands |
| ERC-8.3 | Urban Heat Pilots |
| ERC-8.4 | Municipal Cool Roof Retrofits |
| ERC-8.5 | Cool Libraries |
| ERC-8.6 | Heat-Reducing Public Amenities |
| ERC-8.7 | Extreme Heat Education |
| ERC-8.8 | Heat Waves |
| ERC-8.9 | Cooling Centers |
| ERC-A.3 | CERT Training |
| ERC-A.4 | Heat Reduction in the Public Realm |
| EJ-1.5 | Compatibility with Hazardous Materials Facilities |
| EJ-1.6 | Risk from Hazardous Materials Facilities |
| EJ-1.7 | Transportation Routes |
| EJ-1.8 | Site Contamination |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| EJ-1.9 | Household Hazardous Waste Collection Programs |
| EJ-1.10 | Education |
| PFS-1.6 | Fire Prevention Programs and Suppression |
| PFS-1.7 | Water Supply for Fire Suppression |
| PFS-1.8 | Fire Hazards |
| PFS-1.15 | Development Fees for Facilities and Services |
| PFS-1.16 | Development Review |
| PFS-2.1 | Hazard Mitigation Planning |
| PFS-2.2 | Critical Infrastructure |
| PFS-2.3 | Evacuation Routes |
| PFS-2.4 | Post-Disaster Response |
| PFS-2.5 | Communitywide Resilience |
| PFS-2.6 | Emergency Operations Center |
| PFS-2.7 | Emergency and Disaster Preparedness Exercises |
| PFS-2.8 | Emergency Preparedness Programs |
| PFS-2.9 | Neighborhood Preparedness |
| PFS-2.10 | Sacramento Alert |
| PFS-A.1 | Fire Department Strategic Plan |
| PFS-A.2 | Police Master Strategic Plan |
| NS-PFS-1 | Western Avenue Detention Pond |
| NS-PFS-2 | Historic Magpie Creek |
| NS-PFS-3 | Historic Magpie Creek Channel Modifications |
| NS-PFS-4 | Historic Magpie Creek Material Replacement |
| NS-PFS-5 | Historic Magpie Creek Enhancement |
| NS-PFS-6 | Historic Magpie Creek Support |
| SA-PFS-6 | Flood Control Improvements |
| SA-YPRO-5 | Laguna Floodplain Open Space |
| Equitable Access to Facilities, Services, and Amenities | |
| LUP-2.8 | Co-Location of Community Facilities |
| LUP-2.9 | Expanded Emergency Care Facilities |
| LUP-6.12 | Reconnecting Communities |
| LUP-A.6 | Future High-Frequency Transit Routes |
| NS-LUP-3 | Engage North of I-80 |
| SA-LUP-11 | Jacinto Creek Development |
| HRC-1.19 | Access to Energy Retrofits |
| E-1.6 | Growth in Opportunity Areas |
| E-2.1 | Investments for Inclusive, Equitable Growth |
| E-2.3 | Neighborhood Development Action Team |
| E-2.4 | Access to Labor and Jobs |
| E-3.5 | Local Business Coordination |
| E-A.3 | Paid and Volunteer Job Programs |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| E-A.4 | Life-Long Learning |
| ERC-1.1 | Clean Water Programs |
| ERC-1.5 | Drinking Water Data |
| ERC-2.5 | Environmental Awareness |
| ERC-3.8 | Public Education |
| ERC-4.2 | Air Quality Awareness |
| ERC-5.3 | Water Efficiency Training |
| ERC-5.5 | Publicize Voluntary Programs |
| ERC-6.5 | Community Rating System |
| ERC-8.6 | Heat-Reducing Public Amenities |
| ERC-A.2 | Tree Education |
| ERC-A.3 | CERT Training |
| EJ-A.4 | Community-Led Planning |
| EJ-A.9 | Community Input Database |
| M-1.9 | Equitable Processes and Outcomes |
| M-1.25 | First/Last-Mile Solutions |
| PFS-2.9 | Neighborhood Preparedness |
| YPRO-1.10 | Parkland Access Standard |
| YPRO-1.11 | Enhancing Access to Parks |
| YPRO-1.12 | Parks Programming |
| YPRO-2.1 | Access to Quality Public Facilities and Programs |
| YPRO-2.3 | School Facilities |
| YPRO-2.4 | Library Services |
| YPRO-3.5 | Youth Participation |
| YPRO-A.2 | Park Audits |
| YPRO-A.3 | Mobile Wellness Clinics |
| YPRO-A.4 | Youth Internships |
| NN-YPRO-2 | Organized Sports and Recreational Facilities |
| SN-YPRO-6 | Connections to East Levee Road Trails |
| Financing and Funding | |
| LUP-1.2 | Logical Boundaries |
| LUP-1.9 | Advocacy |
| LUP-9.4 | Vibrant Arts Ecosystem |
| LUP-A.3 | Citywide Municipal Services Review |
| NN-LUP-3 | Financing Plan |
| NN-LUP-5 | Open Space Buffers |
| HCR-1.12 | Incentives for Rehabilitation and Adaptive Reuse of Historic Resources |
| HCR-1.19 | Access to Energy Retrofits |
| HCR-2.7 | Funding and Financing |
| HCR-A.6 | Incentives and Enforcement |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| E-2.2 | Access to Capital |
| E-2.3 | Neighborhood Development Action Team |
| E-3.3 | Small Business Lending |
| E-A.3 | Paid and Volunteer Job Programs |
| E-A.8 | Sustainable Procurement Policy |
| E-A.9 | Competitiveness Assessment |
| FB-ED-1 | Development Incentives |
| ERC-9.10 | Private Ventures |
| EJ-2.14 | Financial Incentives |
| EJ-3.2 | Supplemental Funding Sources for Building Rehabilitation |
| EJ-A.10 | Outreach Funding |
| EJ-A.11 | Healthy Food Initiatives Partnership |
| M-1.40 | Contributions from New Development |
| M-1.41 | Funding |
| M-2.15 | Incentives for Zero-Emission Vehicles (ZEVs) |
| M-A.1 | Transportation Investment Priorities |
| PFS-3.3 | Development Impacts |
| PFS-3.5 | Water Treatment Capacity and Infrastructure |
| PFS-3.7 | Rate and Fee Studies |
| NN-PFS-3 | Development Agreements |
| SA-PFS-3 | Infrastructure Financing |
| YPRO-1.4 | Parkland Dedication Requirements |
| YPRO-1.5 | Incentivizing Onsite Public Facilities |
| YPRO-1.27 | Fee Benchmarking |
| YPRO-1.28 | Leveraging Grant Funds |
| YPRO-1.29 | Park Finance Strategies |
| YPRO-A.5 | Violence Prevention and Youth Development |
| NS-YPRO-5 | Joint-Use Agreement |
| Healthy Built Environment | |
| LUP-1.1 | Compact Urban Footprint |
| LUP-1.10 | Adjacent Development |
| LUP-2.1 | Overall Balance of Uses |
| LUP-4.14 | Elimination of Vehicle Parking Minimums |
| LUP-4.16 | Compatibility Between Light Industrial and Residential Uses |
| LUP-5.2 | Shopping Centers as Focal Points |
| LUP-6.1 | Neighborhoods as a Basic Unit |
| LUP-6.9 | Design Around Open and Green Space |
| LUP-6.12 | Reconnecting Communities |
| LUP-7.1 | Heavy Industry |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| LUP-8.1 | Unique Sense of Place |
| LUP-8.9 | People-Friendly Design |
| LUP-8.10 | Responsiveness to Context |
| LUP-11.3 | Local Human and Ecological Context |
| LUP-A.6 | Future High-Frequency Transit Routes |
| NN-LUP-4 | Landscape Freeway Buffers |
| NN-LUP-5 | Open Space Buffers |
| NN-LUP-6 | Easements in Buffer Areas |
| SA-LUP-10 | Industrial Relocation |
| SN-LUP-4 | Drive-through Commercial |
| HCR-1.10 | Demolition |
| HCR-1.19 | Access to Energy Retrofits |
| ERC-2.2 | Biological Resources |
| ERC-2.3 | Onsite Preservation |
| ERC-2.4 | Native and Climate-Adapted Plants |
| ERC-3.1 | Urban Forest Plan |
| ERC-3.2 | Tree Canopy Expansion |
| ERC-3.3 | Tree Protection |
| ERC-3.4 | Private Streets |
| ERC-3.5 | Tree List |
| ERC-3.6 | Urban Forest Maintenance |
| ERC-3.7 | Trees of Significance |
| ERC-3.8 | Public Education |
| ERC-3.9 | Watering and Irrigation |
| ERC-3.10 | Parking Lot Shading |
| ERC-3.11 | Planting |
| ERC-4.1 | Regional Coordination |
| ERC-4.2 | Air Quality Awareness |
| ERC-4.3 | Project Design |
| ERC-4.4 | Sensitive Uses |
| ERC-4.5 | Construction Emissions |
| ERC-4.7 | Operational Emissions |
| ERC-8.1 | Cooling Design Techniques |
| ERC-8.2 | Large Heat Islands |
| ERC-8.3 | Urban Heat Pilot Projects |
| ERC-8.4 | Municipal Cool Roof Retrofits |
| ERC-8.5 | Cool Libraries |
| ERC-8.6 | Heat-Reducing Public Amenities |
| ERC-8.7 | Extreme Heat Education |
| ERC-8.8 | Heat Waves |
| ERC-8.9 | Cooling Centers |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| ERC-9.12 | Regenerative Food System |
| ERC-10.1 | Exterior Noise Standards |
| ERC-10.2 | Noise Source Control |
| ERC-10.3 | Interior Noise Standards |
| ERC-10.4 | Interior Noise Review for Multiple, Loud, Short-Term Events |
| ERC-10.5 | Interior Vibration Standards |
| ERC-10.6 | Effects of Vibration |
| ERC-10.7 | Vibration |
| ERC-10.8 | Alternative Paving Materials |
| ERC-10.9 | Construction Noise Controls |
| ERC-10.10 | Airport Land Use Compatibility |
| ERC-10.11 | Hazardous Noise Protection |
| ERC-A.7 | Cooling Landscape Standards |
| EJ-2.1 | New Healthy Food Grocers |
| EJ-2.2 | Grocery Access |
| EJ-2.8 | Community and Home Gardening |
| EJ-2.9 | Urban Agriculture in New Development |
| EJ-2.10 | Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone |
| EJ-2.11 | Home-Based Food Enterprises |
| EJ-2.15 | Limit Unhealthy Food Establishments |
| EJ-2.16 | Discourage Unhealthy Uses |
| EJ-3.2 | Supplemental Funding for Sources for Building Rehabilitation |
| EJ-3.3 | Healthy Homes |
| EJ-3.4 | Healthy Environment |
| M-1.2 | User Prioritization |
| M-1.3 | Healthy Transportation System Options |
| M-1.11 | Increase Bicycling and Walking |
| M-1.13 | Walkability |
| M-1.14 | Walking Facilities |
| M-1.15 | Improve Walking Connectivity |
| M-1.16 | Barrier Removal |
| M-1.17 | Improve Bicycling Connectivity |
| M-1.18 | Bicycling Safety |
| M-1.19 | Walking Safety |
| M-4.1 | Application of Safety |
| M-4.2 | Safer Driving Speeds |
| M-4.3 | Vision Zero |
| M-4.4 | Collaborative Safety Solutions |
| M-4.5 | Safety-Related Training |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| M-4.9 | Safe Routes to School |
| NS-M-5 | High-Frequency Transit |
| YPRO-1.1 | Range of Experiences |
| YPRO-1.6 | Underutilized Land |
| YPRO-1.8 | Non-Conventional Park Solutions |
| YPRO-1.9 | Timing of Services |
| YPRO-1.10 | Parkland Access Standard |
| YPRO-1.11 | Enhancing Access to Parks |
| YPRO-1.12 | Parks Programming |
| YPRO-1.18 | Integrated Parks and Recreation System |
| YPRO-1.22 | Organized Sports and Recreational Facilities |
| YPRO-1.24 | Municipal Golf Courses |
| YPRO-3.7 | Inclusive and Accessible Recreational Needs |
| AA-YPRO-2 | New Park Site |
| CC-YPRO-1 | New Park Site |
| CC-YPRO-2 | Activate Existing Parks |
| CC-YPRO-3 | Sacramento River Waterfront Recreation and Access |
| CC-YPRO-4 | Park Amenities |
| CC-YPRO-5 | Organized Sports and Recreational Facilities |
| ES-YPRO-1 | Improve Park Access |
| ES-YPRO-4 | Exercise Equipment |
| FB-YPRO-1 | Granite Regional Park Expansion |
| FB-YPRO-2 | Army Depot Park |
| FB-YPRO-5 | Morrison Creek Project |
| LP-YPRO-4 | Sacramento City College Facilities |
| NN-YPRO-1 | Ninos Parkway |
| NN-YPRO-2 | Organized Sports and Recreational Facilities |
| NS-YPRO-1 | Walter S. Ueda Parkway Access |
| NS-YPRO-2 | Hagginwood Park Access |
| NS-YPRO-3 | Robla Park Clubhouse and Signage |
| NS-YPRO-4 | New Park Site |
| PG-YPRO-4 | Pool and Neighborhood Center Access |
| SA-YPRO-1 | Regional Park |
| SA-YPRO-4 | Community Center Location |
| SA-YPRO-5 | Laguna Floodplain Open Space |
| SA-YPRO-6 | Food-Anchored Resiliency Hubs |
| SN-YPRO-1 | Gardenland Park Access |
| SN-YPRO-2 | Walter S. Ueda Parkway Access |
| SN-YPRO-6 | Connections to East Levee Road Trails |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| Housing Availability, Affordability, and Preservation | |
| (link to Housing Element) | |
| LUP-1.4 | City Services Prior to Annexation |
| LUP-1.5 | Surplus Land Disposition |
| LUP-1.6 | Growth and Change Evaluation |
| LUP-1.7 | Regional Growth Strategy |
| LUP-1.8 | Jobs-Housing Balance |
| LUP-3.1 | Maximum FAR |
| LUP-3.2 | Sliding Floor Area Ratio Scale |
| LUP-3.3 | Allowed Net Building Area |
| LUP-3.4 | Exemption from Sliding Floor Area Ratio Scale for Remodels and Additions |
| LUP-3.5 | Flexibility for Multi-Parcel Development |
| LUP-3.6 | Minimum FAR |
| LUP-3.7 | Minimum Density |
| LUP-3.8 | Development Intensity at Less than the Minimum FAR |
| LUP-3.9 | Minimum Standards for Renovations and Expansions |
| LUP-3.10 | Exemptions for Historic Structure Conversions |
| LUP-3.11 | Zoning Inconsistency |
| LUP-4.14 | Elimination of Vehicle Parking Minimums |
| LUP-4.15 | Vacant Property |
| LUP-5.3 | Mixed-Use Neighborhood Centers |
| LUP-5.4 | Neighborhood Shopping Center Revitalization |
| LUP-6.2 | Range of Residential Development Intensities |
| LUP-6.3 | Variety of Housing Types |
| LUP-6.6 | New Growth Neighborhoods |
| LUP-7.4 | Live/Work Options |
| LUP-7.6 | Industrial Conversion |
| LUP-9.6 | Artist Enclaves/Live-Work Studios |
| LUP-A.2 | Local Bonus Program |
| LUP-A.10 | Planning and Development Code Update |
| LP-LUP-2 | Student Housing |
| SA-LUP-2 | 102-Acre Parcel |
| SA-LUP-5 | Florin Road Reinvestment and Economic Development |
| SA-LUP-12 | Mixed-Use Corridor |
| SN-LUP-1 | Vibrant Northgate |
| HCR-1.19 | Access to Energy Retrofits |
| EJ-3.1 | Resource Optimization |
| EJ-3.2 | Supplemental Funding Sources for Building Rehabilitation |
| EJ-3.3 | Healthy Homes |
| EJ-3.4 | Healthy Environment |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| Infrastructure Maintenance | |
| HCR-1.2 | Maintenance and Preservation |
| HCR-1.7 | Contextual Features |
| HCR-1.8 | Ongoing Maintenance |
| E-3.4 | Shared Infrastructure |
| ERC-A.6 | Landscape Maintenance Ordinance |
| M-1.39 | Maintain the Street System |
| M-5.3 | Bridges |
| M-5.4 | Rail Operations Impacts |
| M-5.9 | Truck Route Design |
| M-5.14 | Helicopter Use |
| M-5.15 | Drones |
| NS-M-6 | Street Improvements |
| PFS-3.4 | Water Distribution System Management |
| PFS-3.5 | Water Treatment Capacity and Infrastructure |
| PFS-3.6 | Combined Sewer System Rehabilitation and Improvements |
| PFS-3.8 | Capital Improvement Programming |
| PFS-3.10 | Meet Projected Needs |
| PFS-3.12 | Safe, Compatible Utility Design |
| PFS-4.1 | Exercise and Protect Water Rights |
| PFS-4.2 | Water Supply Sustainability |
| PFS-4.3 | Surface Water Supply |
| PFS-4.4 | Groundwater Infrastructure |
| PFS-4.5 | Comprehensive Water Supply Planning |
| PFS-4.6 | Recycled Water |
| PFS-4.7 | Water Supply During Emergencies |
| PFS-4.8 | New Development |
| PFS-6.3 | Adequate Facilities and Service |
| PFS-A.1 | Fire Department Strategic Plan |
| PFS-A.2 | Police Master Strategic Plan |
| PFS-A.3 | Sewer Long Range Plan Updates |
| PFS-A.4 | Stormwater Master Planning |
| PFS-A.5 | Onsite Non-Potable Water Reuse |
| PFS-A.6 | Water Treatment Facilities |
| PFS-A.7 | Telecommunication Infrastructure in New Development |
| PFS-A.8 | Municipal Telecommunications Team |
| PFS-A.9 | Periodic Review |
| FB-PFS-1 | Storm System Impacts |
| NN-PFS-2 | Drainage Facilities |
| NN-PFS-4 | Operational Drainage Facilities |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| NS-PFS-7 | Assessment Districts |
| SA-PFS-4 | Utility Undergrounding |
| SA-PFS-5 | Infrastructure Deficiencies |
| YPRO-1.2 | Youth, Parks, & Community Enrichment (YPCE) Parks Plan |
| YPRO-1.24 | Municipal Golf Courses |
| YPRO-1.26 | Maintenance of Existing Facilities |
| Inter-Agency Collaboration | |
| LUP-1.7 | Regional Growth Strategy |
| LUP-1.10 | Adjacent Development |
| LUP-1.11 | Airport Land Use Compatibility |
| LUP-A.1 | Areas of Concern |
| LUP-A.6 | Future High-Frequency Transit Routes |
| HCR-2.6 | Coordination with Other Entities |
| HCR-A.2 | Heritage Tourism Plan |
| E-2.8 | Public Procurement |
| E-4.1 | Coordinated Economic and Community Development |
| ERC-1.2 | Clean Watershed |
| ERC-2.6 | Wetland Protection |
| ERC-2.7 | Annual Grasslands |
| ERC-2.9 | Habitat Assessments |
| ERC-2.10 | Agency Coordination |
| ERC-4.2 | Air Quality Awareness |
| ERC-6.2 | Flood Management Planning Coordination |
| ERC-6.8 | Interagency Levee Management |
| ERC-8.5 | Cool Libraries |
| EJ-2.2 | Grocery Access |
| EJ-3.1 | Resource Optimization |
| EJ-3.2 | Supplemental Funding for Sources for Building Rehabilitation |
| EJ-3.3 | Healthy Homes |
| EJ-A.11 | Healthy Food Initiatives Partnership |
| M-2.4 | Shared Shuttles |
| M-2.6 | Transit/Event Coordination |
| M-2.7 | Free or Discounted Transit Passes |
| M-2.9 | Advocacy and Events |
| M-5.10 | Aviation Facilities |
| M-5.11 | Aviation Services |
| M-5.12 | Zero-Emission Aircraft |
| M-5.13 | Efficient Ground Connections |
| NS-M-5 | High-Frequency Transit |
| PFS-1.1 | Crime and Law Enforcement |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| PFS-1.2 | Community-Based Policing |
| PFS-1.3 | Communication with Residents and Businesses |
| PFS-1.4 | Community Programs |
| PFS-2.3 | Evacuation Routes |
| PFS-3.1 | Provision of Adequate Facilities |
| NN-PFS-1 | Coordinate with Other Agencies |
| YPRO-2.3 | School Facilities |
| YPRO-2.4 | Library Services |
| YPRO-3.1 | Health Data and Programming |
| Investments in Equity | |
| LUP-1.8 | Jobs-Housing Balance |
| LUP-4.16 | Compatibility Between Light Industrial and Residential Uses |
| LUP-5.6 | Local Business Preservation |
| LUP-6.12 | Reconnecting Communities |
| LUP-9.1 | Cultural and Entertainment Centers |
| LUP-9.7 | Anti-Displacement Strategies |
| LUP-A.2 | Local Bonus Program |
| LUP-A.6 | Future High-Frequency Transit Routes |
| HCR-1.13 | Indigenous Cultures |
| HCR-1.14 | Archaeological, Tribal, and Cultural Resources |
| E-1.6 | Growth in Opportunity Areas |
| E-2.1 | Investments for Inclusive, Equitable Growth |
| E-2.3 | Neighborhood Development Action Team |
| E-2.4 | Access to Labor and Jobs |
| E-2.5 | Opportunity Zones |
| E-2.7 | Small Business/Startup Support |
| E-4.2 | Inclusive Economic Development Investments |
| E-A.3 | Paid and Volunteer Job Programs |
| E-A.4 | Life-Long Learning |
| E-A.6 | Workforce Preparedness Program |
| ERC-2.5 | Environmental Awareness |
| ERC-5.1 | Active Water Conservation Program |
| ERC-8.6 | Heat-Reducing Public Amenities |
| EJ-1.1 | Air Quality Monitoring |
| EJ-1.2 | Community Air Protection |
| EJ-1.3 | Data-Informed Efforts |
| EJ-2.1 | New Healthy Food Grocers |
| EJ-2.2 | Grocery Access |
| EJ-2.3 | Open Air Food Sales |
| EJ-2.4 | Expanded Reach of Food Distribution |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| EJ-2.5 | Food Assistance Programs |
| EJ-2.10 | Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone |
| EJ-2.11 | Home-Based Food Enterprises |
| EJ-2.14 | Financial Incentives |
| EJ-2.15 | Limit Unhealthy Food Establishments |
| EJ-2.17 | Healthy Food Promotion |
| EJ-2.19 | Farm-to-Fork |
| EJ-2.20 | Evaluating Health Impacts |
| EJ-3.1 | Resource Optimization |
| EJ-3.2 | Supplemental Funding for Sources for Building Rehabilitation |
| EJ-4.4 | Capacity Building |
| EJ-4.5 | Increasing Participation of Underserved Communities |
| EJ-4.6 | Community Oversight |
| EJ-4.7 | Sustained Engagement |
| EJ-5.1 | Equity Education |
| EJ-5.2 | Internal Practices |
| EJ-5.3 | Cross-Functional Action Team |
| EJ-5.4 | Racial, Gender, and LGBTQ+ Equity |
| EJ-5.5 | Investment Prioritization |
| EJ-5.6 | Embedding Racial Equity |
| EJ-A.4 | Community-Led Planning |
| EJ-A.7 | Healthy Food Zoning |
| M-1.10 | Community Engagement |
| PFS-6.5 | Broadband Access |
| PFS-6.6 | Net Neutrality |
| YPRO-1.3 | Parkland Service Standard |
| YPRO-1.24 | Welcoming Amenities |
| YPRO-A.3 | Mobile Wellness Clinics |
| YPRO-A.7 | Performance-Based Prioritization |
| ES-YPRO-1 | Improve Park Access |
| FB-YPRO-6 | UC Davis Medical Center Events |
| Joint-Use Facilities and Co-Location | |
| LUP-2.8 | Co-Location of Community Facilities |
| LUP-4.3 | Anchor Institutions |
| LUP-5.2 | Shopping Centers as Focal Points |
| LUP-7.4 | Live/Work Options |
| LUP-9.1 | Cultural and Entertainment Centers |
| LUP-9.3 | Assembly Facilities and Event Centers |
| LUP-7.6 | Industrial Conversion |
| PG-LUP-1 | Town Centers |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| E-3.4 | Shared Infrastructure |
| E-A.5 | Cluster Development Strategy |
| ERC-9.6 | Resiliency Hubs |
| M-1.32 | Supportive Infrastructure in the Public Right-of-Way |
| M-1.34 | Electric Mobility (E-Mobility) Hubs |
| M-2.11 | Passenger Pick-Up/Drop-Off |
| M-2.16 | Shared Parking |
| M-5.2 | Sacramento Valley Station |
| M-A.6 | Sacramento Valley Station Regional Governance Structure |
| PFS-1.9 | Co-Location of Facilities |
| PFS-1.10 | Cooperative Delivery of Services |
| PFS-3.11 | Joint-Use Facilities |
| PFS-6.3 | Co-Location |
| YPRO-1.7 | Co-Located Joint-Use Facilities |
| YPRO-2.2 | Co-Location of Community-Serving Facilities |
| YPRO-A.6 | Joint-Use Standards |
| Leveraging Development | |
| LUP-A.2 | Local Bonus Program |
| NN-LUP-2 | Commercial Center Placemaking |
| SA-LUP-5 | Florin Road Reinvestment and Economic Development |
| SN-LUP-3 | Truxel Road Site Design |
| ERC-2.3 | Onsite Preservation |
| ERC-3.4 | Private Streets |
| ERC-3.11 | Planting |
| ERC-4.3 | Project Design |
| ERC-8.1 | Cooling Design Techniques |
| ERC-9.4 | Carbon-Neutral Buildings |
| ERC-A.9 | Minimum Tree Requirements |
| ERC-A.10 | Parking Lot Shade Ordinance |
| FB-ED-1 | Development Incentives |
| M-1.7 | Fine-Grained Network |
| M-1.15 | Improve Walking Connectivity |
| M-1.40 | Contributions from New Development |
| M-3.4 | Cul-de-Sacs |
| PFS-1.7 | Water Supply for Fire Suppression |
| PFS-1.8 | Fire Hazards |
| PFS-1.15 | Development Fees for Facilities and Services |
| PFS-1.16 | Development Review |
| PFS-3.6 | Combined Sewer System Rehabilitation and Improvements |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| PFS-3.14 | Underground Utilities |
| PFS-3.16 | Stormwater Design in Private Development |
| PFS-6.6 | Net Neutrality |
| YPRO-3.6 | Private Commercial Recreational Facilities |
| Local Business Support | |
| LUP-1.8 | Jobs-Housing Balance |
| LUP-5.2 | Shopping Centers as Focal Points |
| LUP-5.3 | Mixed-Use Neighborhood Centers |
| LUP-5.4 | Neighborhood Shopping Center Revitalization |
| LUP-5.5 | Neighborhood Commerce |
| LUP-5.6 | Local Business Preservation |
| LUP-6.11 | Home-Based Businesses |
| LUP-7.4 | Live/Work Options |
| LUP-9.2 | Destination City |
| LUP-A.11 | Home Occupation Regulations |
| CC-LUP-1 | Central Business District |
| CC-LUP-2 | Local Retail |
| CC-LUP-3 | Old Sacramento Waterfront Community Uses |
| CC-LUP-4 | Old Sacramento Retail Visioning |
| CC-LUP-5 | Old Sacramento Access and Views |
| CC-LUP-6 | Old Sacramento River Views |
| CC-LUP-7 | Old Sacramento Cultural Arts District |
| FB-LUP-2 | Stockton Business Revitalization |
| FB-LUP-3 | Light Industrial on Stockton Boulevard |
| FB-LUP-4 | Army Depot Special Planning District |
| SA-LUP-3 | Neighborhood Serving Land Uses Around Commercial Corridors |
| SA-LUP-6 | South Area Food Culture |
| HCR-2.6 | Coordination with Other Entities |
| HCR-3.3 | Heritage Tourism |
| HCR-A.3 | Education and Awareness |
| E-1.1 | Strengthening Employment Clusters |
| E-1.2 | Business Attraction and Expansion |
| E-1.3 | Tradable Industries |
| E-1.4 | Suitable Buildings and Sites |
| E-1.6 | Growth in Opportunity Areas |
| E-1.7 | Destination for Businesses |
| E-1.8 | Economic Development Strategic Plan |
| E-1.9 | Nighttime Economy |
| E-2.1 | Investments for Inclusive, Equitable Growth |
| E-2.2 | Access to Capital |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| E-2.5 | Opportunity Zones |
| E-2.6 | Sustainable Business Programs |
| E-2.7 | Small Business/Startup Support |
| E-2.8 | Public Procurement |
| E-2.9 | Local Pilot Projects |
| E-3.3 | Small Business Lending |
| E-3.5 | Local Business Coordination |
| E-3.6 | Economic Gardening |
| E-4.4 | Local Business Needs Assessment |
| E-A.2 | Aligning Education and Training |
| E-A.3 | Paid and Volunteer Job Programs |
| E-A.4 | Life-Long Learning |
| E-A.5 | Cluster Development Strategy |
| E-A.6 | Workforce Preparedness Program |
| EJ-2.1 | New Healthy Food Grocers |
| EJ-2.7 | Partner with Farmers |
| EJ-2.11 | Home-Based Food Enterprises |
| EJ-2.12 | Regional Food Hub |
| EJ-2.14 | Financial Incentives |
| EJ-2.19 | Farm-to-Fork |
| EJ-A.1 | Retailer Incentive Program |
| FB-ED-2 | Florins-Perkins Industrial Area |
| FB-ED-3 | Local Business Sponsorship |
| FB-ED-4 | Stockton Boulevard Business Participation |
| M-5.6 | Good Movement Facilities |
| M-2.2 | Wider Participation |
| PFS-5.1 | Solid Waste Reduction |
| Older Adults | |
| LUP-6.5 | Established Neighborhoods |
| LUP-6.10 | Care Facilities |
| LUP-9.5 | Arts Education |
| NN-LUP-2 | Commercial Center Placemaking |
| PG-LUP-1 | Town Centers |
| E-4.6 | Education and Training Systems |
| E-4.7 | Barriers to Workforce Participation |
| E-4.8 | Entrepreneurship and Social Enterprise Training |
| E-A.4 | Life-Long Learning |
| ERC-9.6 | Resiliency Hubs |
| EJ-2.2 | Grocery Access |
| M-1.4 | Designing to Move People |
| M-4.1 | Application of Safety |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| M-4.2 | Safer Driving Speeds |
| M-4.3 | Vision Zero |
| YPRO-2.7 | Child/Older Adult Care |
| YPRO-3.3 | Health Programming and Events |
| ES-YPRO-3 | River Amenities |
| ES-YPRO-4 | Exercise Equipment |
| PG-YPRO-4 | Pool and Neighborhood Center Access |
| Pollution Reduction/Prevention | |
| LUP-4.14 | Elimination of Vehicle Parking Minimums |
| LUP-4.16 | Compatibility Between Light Industrial and Residential Uses |
| LUP-7.2 | Industrial Uses Along Rivers |
| LUP-7.3 | Production, Distribution, and Repair |
| LUP-A.6 | Future High-Frequency Transit Routes |
| HCR-1.19 | Access to Energy Retrofits |
| ERC-1.1 | Clean Water Programs |
| ERC-1.2 | Clean Watershed |
| ERC-1.3 | Runoff Contamination |
| ERC-1.4 | Construction Site Impacts |
| ERC-2.1 | Conservation of Water Resources in Open Space Areas |
| ERC-4.1 | Regional Coordination |
| ERC-4.2 | Air Quality Awareness |
| ERC-4.3 | Project Design |
| ERC-4.4 | Sensitive Uses |
| ERC-4.5 | Construction Emissions |
| ERC-4.6 | Gas-Powered Landscaping Equipment |
| ERC-4.7 | Operational Emissions |
| ERC-5.2 | Reducing Storm Runoff |
| ERC-9.1 | Communitywide GHG Reduction |
| ERC-9.2 | Additional GHG Emission Programs |
| ERC-9.12 | Regenerative Food System |
| NN-ERC-1 | Fisherman's Lake Buffer |
| NS-ERC-1 | McClellan Heights and Park Homes Plan Noise Area |
| NS-EJ-1 | Neighborhood Clean Up |
| EJ-1.1 | Air Quality Monitoring |
| EJ-1.2 | Community Air Protection |
| EJ-1.3 | Data-Informed Efforts |
| EJ-1.4 | Impacts Assessment |
| EJ-1.5 | Compatibility with Hazardous Materials Facilities |
| EJ-1.6 | Risks from Hazardous Materials Facilities |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| EJ-1.7 | Transportation Routes |
| EJ-1.8 | Site Contamination |
| EJ-1.9 | Household Hazardous Waste Collection Programs |
| EJ-1.10 | Education |
| EJ-A.5 | Amortization Ordinance |
| M-1.20 | High Frequency Transit Service |
| M-1.21 | Extension of Transit Service |
| M-1.22 | Increase Transit Ridership |
| M-1.23 | Transit Priority |
| M-1.24 | Transit-Only Lanes |
| M-1.25 | First/Last-Mile Solutions |
| M-1.26 | Bus Stop Design |
| M-1.27 | Electric Vehicle (EV) Strategy |
| M-1.28 | Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Capital |
| M-1.29 | Shared Zero-Emission Vehicles (ZEVs) |
| M-1.30 | Public Electric Vehicle (EV) Infrastructure Deployment |
| M-1.31 | Private Electric Vehicle (EV) Infrastructure Deployment |
| M-1.32 | Supportive Infrastructure in the Public Right-of-Way |
| M-1.33 | Electric Vehicle (EV) Car Share and Electric Bike Share |
| M-1.34 | Electric Mobility (E-Mobility) Hubs |
| M-1.35 | Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV) First |
| M-1.36 | Electric Vehicles in New Development |
| M-1.37 | Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging in Existing Development |
| M-1.38 | Electric Vehicles (EVs) and Energy Resiliency |
| M-2.3 | Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as Metric |
| M-2.4 | Shared Shuttles |
| M-2.5 | Onsite Childcare |
| M-2.6 | Transit/Event Coordination |
| M-2.14 | Parking Supply |
| M-2.15 | Incentives for Zero-Emission Vehicles (ZEVs) |
| M-2.16 | Shared Parking |
| M-2.17 | Parking Management Strategy |
| M-2.18 | Technology to Optimize Parking Utilization |
| M-2.19 | Optimizing Residential Utilization |
| M-5.7 | Zero-Emission Fleets |
| M-5.8 | Zero Emission Delivery |
| M-5.12 | Zero-Emission Aircraft |
| M-A.5 | Regional Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Mitigation |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| M-A.9 | Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Ordinance |
| NS-M-5 | High-Frequency Transit |
| PFS-3.3 | Development Impacts |
| PFS-3.13 | Impacts to Environmentally Sensitive Lands |
| PFS-3.15 | Adequate Drainage Facilities |
| PFS-3.16 | Stormwater Design in Private Development |
| PFS-3.17 | Regional Stormwater Facilities |
| PFS-5.1 | Solid Waste Reduction |
| PFS-5.2 | Collection and Recycling Services |
| PFS-5.3 | Mixed and Organic Recycling |
| PFS-5.4 | Regional Recycling Market Development Zone |
| PFS-5.5 | Recycled Materials in New Construction |
| PFS-5.6 | Bulky Item and Appliance Disposal |
| PFS-5.7 | Organic Waste Collection Services |
| PFS-5.8 | Household Hazardous Waste Disposal |
| PFS-5.9 | Targeted Technical Assistance |
| PFS-A.3 | Sewer Long Range Plan Updates |
| PFS-A.4 | Stormwater Master Planning |
| PFS-A.5 | Onsite Non-Potable Water Reuse |
| PFS-A.6 | Water Treatment Facilities |
| AA-PFS-1 | Neighborhood Clean Up |
| YPRO-1.19 | Sustainable Design |
| ES-YPRO-3 | River Amenities |
| SN-YPRO-6 | Connections to East Levee Road Trails |
| Public Spaces | |
| LUP-8.12 | Design of Privately-Developed Public Spaces |
| LUP-9.8 | Public Art |
| NN-LUP-2 | Commercial Center Placemaking |
| SN-LUP-2 | Northgate Boulevard Placemaking |
| HCR-1.13 | Indigenous Cultures |
| HCR-1.16 | Endemic Traditions |
| HCR-A.3 | Education and Awareness |
| M-3.5 | Open Street Events |
| M-3.6 | Outdoor Dining Program |
| NS-M-6 | Street Improvements |
| YPRO-1.1 | Range of Experiences |
| YPRO-1.6 | Underutilized Land |
| YPRO-1.8 | Non-Conventional Park Solutions |
| YPRO-1.9 | Timing of Services |
| YPRO-1.10 | Parkland Access Standard |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| YPRO-1.11 | Enhancing Access to Parks |
| YPRO-1.12 | Parks Programming |
| YPRO-1.18 | Integrated Parks and Recreation System |
| YPRO-1.22 | Organized Sports and Recreational Facilities |
| YPRO-1.24 | Municipal Golf Courses |
| YPRO-3.7 | Inclusive and Accessible Recreational Needs |
| AA-YPRO-2 | New Park Site |
| CC-YPRO-1 | New Park Site |
| CC-YPRO-2 | Activate Existing Parks |
| CC-YPRO-3 | Sacramento River Waterfront Recreation and Access |
| CC-YPRO-4 | Park Amenities |
| CC-YPRO-5 | Organized Sports and Recreational Facilities |
| ES-YPRO-1 | Improve Park Access |
| ES-YPRO-4 | Exercise Equipment |
| FB-YPRO-1 | Granite Regional Park Expansion |
| FB-YPRO-2 | Army Depot Park |
| FB-YPRO-5 | Morrison Creek Project |
| LP-YPRO-4 | Sacramento City College Facilities |
| NN-YPRO-1 | Ninos Parkway |
| NS-YPRO-1 | Walter S. Ueda Parkway Access |
| NS-YPRO-2 | Hagginwood Park Access |
| NS-YPRO-3 | Robla Park Clubhouse and Signage |
| NS-YPRO-4 | New Park Site |
| PG-YPRO-4 | Pool and Neighborhood Center Access |
| SA-YPRO-1 | Regional Park |
| SA-YPRO-4 | Community Center Location |
| SA-YPRO-5 | Laguna Floodplain Open Space |
| SA-YYPRO-6 | Food-Anchored Resiliency Hubs |
| SN-YPRO-1 | Gardenland Park Access |
| SN-YPRO-2 | Walter S. Ueda Parkway Access |
| Racial Equity | |
| LUP-1.7 | Regional Growth Strategy |
| SA-LUP-6 | South Area Food Culture |
| HCR-3.1 | Education and Awareness |
| HCR-A.9 | Native American Cultural Resources |
| E-1.6 | Growth in Opportunity Areas |
| E-2.3 | Neighborhood Development Action Team |
| E-2.5 | Opportunity Zones |
| E-2.7 | Small Business/Startup Support |
| E-2.8 | Public Procurement |
| ERC-2.5 | Environmental Awareness |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| EJ-5.6 | Embedding Racial Equity |
| EJ-A.3 | DAC Representation |
| EJ-A.4 | Community-Led Planning |
| EJ-A.6 | Performance Zoning |
| EJ-A.8 | Racial Equity Analysis |
| Regional Scale Planning | |
| LUP-1.2 | Logical Boundaries |
| LUP-1.3 | New Growth Annexation |
| LUP-1.4 | City Services Prior to Annexation |
| LUP-1.5 | Surplus Land Disposition |
| LUP-1.7 | Regional Growth Strategy |
| LUP-1.9 | Advocacy |
| LUP-1.10 | Adjacent Development |
| LUP-5.1 | Evolving Regional Commercial Centers |
| LUP-A.1 | Areas of Concern |
| LUP-A.4 | Fruitridge-Florin Annexation |
| FB-LUP-5 | City/County Coordination |
| SA-LUP-7 | Health Care Sector Growth |
| SA-LUP-8 | Sacramento Executive Airport |
| SA-LUP-9 | Industrial Development Near 47th Street |
| SA-LUP-15 | Town of Freeport Long-Range Development |
| E-1.2 | Business Attraction and Expansion |
| E-1.7 | Destination for Businesses |
| E-2.2 | Access to Capital |
| ERC-1.2 | Clean Watershed |
| ERC-1.3 | Runoff Contamination |
| ERC-1.6 | Groundwater Management |
| ERC-2.1 | Conservation of Water Resources in Open Space Areas |
| ERC-2.11 | Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan |
| ERC-2.12 | Support Habitat Conservation Plan Efforts |
| ERC-4.1 | Regional Coordination |
| ERC-6.2 | Flood Management Planning Coordination |
| ERC-6.8 | Interagency Levee Management |
| EJ-2.6 | Food Recovery Program |
| EJ-2.12 | Regional Food Hub |
| M-1.20 | High Frequency Transit Service |
| M-1.21 | Extension of Transit Service |
| M-2.8 | Micro-Transit Service |
| M-5.1 | Regional Mobility System |
| M-5.2 | Sacramento Valley Station |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| M-5.3 | Bridges |
| M-5.4 | Rail Operations Impacts |
| M-5.5 | Regional Advocacy |
| M-5.7 | Zero-Emission Fleets |
| M-A.5 | Regional Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Mitigation |
| M-A.6 | Sacramento Valley Station Regional Governance Structure |
| M-A.7 | Roadway Reallocations |
| PFS-3.9 | Methane Recovery |
| PFS-3.17 | Regional Stormwater Facilities |
| SN-YPRO-5 | American River Maintenance |
| River Access and Views | |
| LUP-8.2 | River as Signature Feature |
| LUP-8.3 | River Access and Ecology |
| LUP-8.15 | Setbacks from Rivers and Creeks |
| CC-LUP-5 | Old Sacramento Access and Views |
| CC-LUP-6 | Old Sacramento River Views |
| CC-LUP-7 | Old Sacramento Cultural Arts District |
| SN-LUP-5 | Riverfront Landscaping |
| ERC-6.3 | Floodway Capacity |
| SN-M-4 | American River Parkway Connections |
| YPRO-1.16 | River Parkways |
| YPRO-1.17 | Waterway Recreation and Access |
| YPRO-1.18 | Miller Regional Park/Sacramento Marina |
| CC-YPRO-3 | Sacramento River Waterfront Recreation and Access |
| ES-YPRO-3 | River Amenities |
| PG-YPRO-1 | River Parkway |
| PG-YPRO-2 | Parkways/Greenways |
| SN-YPRO-4 | River Access Points |
| Roadway Safety | |
| LUP-6.8 | Gated Communities |
| M-4.1 | Application of Safety |
| M-4.2 | Safer Driving Speeds |
| M-4.3 | Vision Zero |
| M-4.4 | Collaborative Safety Solutions |
| M-4.5 | Safety-Related Training |
| M-4.6 | Rail Crossings |
| M-4.7 | Integrated Goods Movement |
| M-4.8 | Detour Facilities |
| M-4.9 | Safe Routes to School |
| M-A.3 | High Injury Network |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| M-A.4 | Curb Space Management Plan |
| M-A.10 | Street Design Standards Update |
| CC-M-1 | Roadway Reallocations |
| CC-M-3 | Curbside Management |
| CC-M-4 | Traffic Calming |
| FB-M-1 | Roadway Reallocations |
| NS-M-1 | Roadway Reallocations |
| NS-M-4 | Traffic Calming |
| SA-PFS-1 | Effective Infrastructure at TODs |
| Streamlined City Processes | |
| LUP-1.14 | Deed Notice |
| LUP-3.9 | Minimum Standards for Renovations and Expansions |
| LUP-3.10 | Exemptions for Historic Structure Conversions |
| LUP-3.11 | Zoning Inconsistency |
| LUP-4.2 | Incentivizing Infill |
| LUP-A.5 | Special Studies |
| NN-LUP-4 | Employment Center Development Guidelines |
| HCR-1.18 | Evaluation of Potentially Eligible Built Environment Resources |
| HCR-2.1 | Administration of Functions and Programs |
| HCR-2.2 | Certified Local Government |
| HCR-2.3 | Sacramento Register |
| HCR-2.5 | Code Compliance |
| HCR-A.7 | Guidance Documents |
| E-3.1 | State-of-the-Art Business and Industrial Areas |
| E-3.2 | Innovation and Growth |
| E-A.9 | Competitiveness Assessment |
| EJ-A.9 | Community Input Database |
| PFS-1.14 | Timing of Services |
| Streetscapes | |
| LUP-2.5 | Design for Connectivity |
| LUP-4.6 | Compatibility with Adjoining Uses |
| LUP-4.7 | Visual and Physical Character |
| LUP-4.8 | Buildings that Engage the Street |
| LUP-4.9 | Enhanced Pedestrian Environment |
| LUP-4.10 | Multi-Modal Access |
| LUP-4.11 | Shared Parking, Driveways, and Alley Access |
| LUP-6.5 | Established Neighborhoods |
| LUP-8.4 | Enhanced City Gateways |
| LUP-8.5 | Development Adjacent to Freeways and Railroad Corridors |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| LUP-8.6 | Prominent Corner Architecture |
| LUP-8.8 | Iconic Sense of Place |
| LUP-8.9 | People-Friendly Design |
| LUP-8.13 | Continuity of Streetscape Design |
| LUP-8.14 | Streetscape Beautification |
| NS-LUP-1 | Del Paso Boulevard Activation and Placemaking Improvements |
| NS-LUP-2 | Del Paso Creative Activation |
| SA-LUP-4 | Corridor Revitalization |
| SN-LUP-3 | Truxel Road Site Design |
| HCR-1.7 | Contextual Features |
| HCR-1.3 | Compatibility with Historic Context |
| ERC-2.4 | Native and Climate-Adapted Plants |
| ERC-3.11 | Planting |
| ERC-A.4 | Heat Reduction in the Public Realm |
| ERC-A.5 | Bus Shelter Design |
| ERC-A.7 | Cooling Landscape Standards |
| ERC-A.9 | Minimum Tree Requirements |
| ERC-A.11 | Street Standards for Tree Canopy |
| M-1.5 | Street Design Standards |
| M-1.6 | Transit Integration |
| M-2.10 | Curbside Management |
| M-2.11 | Passenger Pick-Up/Drop-Off |
| M-2.12 | Innovative Mobility Solutions and Curb of the Future |
| M-2.13 | Curb and Mobility Use Data |
| M-3.1 | Local Streets |
| M-3.2 | Street Design |
| M-3.3 | Traffic |
| M-3.4 | Cul-de-Sacs |
| M-3.5 | Open Street Events |
| M-3.6 | Outdoor Dining Program |
| M-4.1 | Application of Safety |
| M-A.10 | Street Design Standards Update |
| CC-M.4 | Traffic Calming |
| NS-M-1 | Street Extensions |
| NS-M-6 | Street Improvements |
| PFS-1.5 | CPTED Strategies |
| YPRO-1.13 | Park Safety |
| Technology | |
| LUP-2.7 | Evolving Office Needs |
| E-3.1 | State-of-the-Art Business and Industrial Areas |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| E-3.7 | Investments in Technology |
| E-A.10 | Municipal Open Data |
| ERC-1.5 | Drinking Water Data |
| ERC-4.2 | Air Quality Awareness |
| ERC-9.3 | Lead by Example in Design of Buildings |
| EJ-2.20 | Evaluating Health Impacts |
| EJ-A.9 | Community Input Database |
| M-2.1 | Transportation Demand Management (TDM) |
| M-2.13 | Curb and Mobility Use Data |
| M-2.18 | Technology to Optimize Parking Utilization |
| M-6.1 | Pioneer New Mobility Techniques |
| M-6.2 | Mobility Partnerships |
| M-6.3 | Mobility Data Access |
| M-6.4 | System Management |
| M-6.5 | Data-Driven Prioritization |
| M-6.6 | Innovation for System Performance |
| M-6.7 | Data to Spur Innovation |
| M-6.8 | Data from Private Operators |
| PFS-1.13 | Technology to Improve Public Safety |
| PFS-6.1 | Access and Availability |
| PFS-6.2 | Public/Private Collaboration |
| PFS-6.3 | Adequate Facilities and Service |
| PFS-6.4 | Co-Location |
| PFS-6.5 | Broadband Access |
| PFS-6.6 | Net Neutrality |
| PFS-6.7 | City Operations/Public Services |
| PFS-6.8 | Telecommunication Infrastructure Improvements |
| PFS-A.7 | Telecommunication Infrastructure in New Development |
| PFS-A.8 | Municipal Telecommunications Team |
| PFS-A.9 | Periodic Review |
| YPRO-2.5 | Digital Literacy and Access |
| YPRO-3.1 | Health Data and Programming |
| Transit-Supportive Development | |
| LUP-1.1 | Compact Urban Footprint |
| LUP-2.1 | Overall Balance of Uses |
| LUP-2.2 | Interconnected City |
| LUP-2.3 | Diverse Centers and Corridors |
| LUP-2.4 | Development Intensity Linked to Transit |
| LUP-2.5 | Design for Connectivity |
| LUP-2.6 | Employment Clusters |
| LUP-4.1 | Transit-Supported Development |
| LUP-4.2 | Incentivizing Infill |
| LUP-4.4 | Public Uses and Services |
| LUP-4.5 | Efficient Parel Utilization |
| LUP-4.12 | Drive-Through Restaurants |
| LUP-4.14 | Elimination of Vehicle Parking Minimums |
| LUP-5.1 | Evolving Regional Commercial Centers |
| FB-LUP-1 | Transit-Supportive Uses |
| LP-LUP-1 | Transit Oriented Development |
| NN-LUP-1 | Mixed-Use Nodes |
| NN-LUP-2 | Commercial Center Placemaking |
| PG-LUP-1 | Town Centers |
| SA-LUP-1 | Development Around South Line Light Rail Stations |
| SA-LUP-14 | Meadowview Light Rail Station |
| SN-LUP-3 | Truxel Road Site Design |
| E-2.4 | Access to Labor and Jobs |
| ERC-8.6 | Heat-Reducing Public Amenities |
| ERC-A.4 | Heat Reduction in the Public Realm |
| EJ-2.1 | New Healthy Food Grocers |
| EJ-2.2 | Grocery Access |
| M-1.6 | Transit Integration |
| M-1.12 | Light Rail Transit (LRT) Station Access Improvements |
| M-1.20 | High-Frequency Transit Service |
| M-1.21 | Extension of Transit Service |
| M-1.22 | Increase Transit Ridership |
| M-1.23 | Transit Priority |
| M-1.24 | Transit-Only Lanes |
| M-1.25 | First/Last-Mile Solutions |
| M-1.26 | Bus Stop Design |
| M-2.1 | Transportation Demand Management (TDM) |
| M-2.2 | Wider Participation |
| M-2.4 | Shared Shuttles |
| M-2.5 | Onsite Childcare |
| M-2.6 | Transit/Event Coordination |
| M-2.7 | Free or Discounted Transit Passes |
| M-2.8 | Micro-Transit Service |
| M-2.9 | Advocacy and Events |
| ES-M-2 | Sacramento State Transport |
| FB-M-1 | SmaRT Rides |
| NN-M-1 | Light Rail Corridor |
| NN-M-2 | Light Rail Right-of-Way |
| NN-M-3 | High-Frequency Transit |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| NN-M-4 | Transit Center |
| NN-M-5 | Light Rail Stations |
| SN-M-1 | Improved Transit |
| SN-M-2 | Transit Right-of-Way |
| ES-TV-1 | Transit Supportive Uses |
| YPRO-2.3 | School Facilities |
| YPRO-A.1 | Youth, Parks, & Community Enrichment (YPCE) Parks Plan Update |
| Urban Forest | |
| LUP-4.1 | Transit-Supportive Development |
| LUP-5.2 | Shopping Centers as Focal Points |
| LUP-6.5 | Established Neighborhoods |
| LUP-8.1 | Unique Sense of Place |
| LUP-8.5 | Development Adjacent to Freeways and Railroad Corridors |
| LUP-8.9 | People-Friendly Design |
| LUP-8.12 | Design of Privately-Developed Public Spaces |
| LUP-8.14 | Streetscape Beautification |
| LUP-A.10 | Planning and Development Code Update |
| ERC-2.3 | Onsite Preservation |
| ERC-2.4 | Native and Climate-Adapted Plants |
| ERC-3.1 | Urban Forest Plan |
| ERC-3.2 | Tree Canopy Expansion |
| ERC-3.3 | Tree Protection |
| ERC-3.4 | Private Streets |
| ERC-3.5 | Tree List |
| ERC-3.6 | Urban Forest Maintenance |
| ERC-3.7 | Trees of Significance |
| ERC-3.8 | Public Education |
| ERC-3.9 | Watering and Irrigation |
| ERC-3.10 | Parking Lot Shading |
| ERC-3.11 | Planting |
| ERC-A.1 | Urban Forest Plan |
| ERC-A.2 | Tree Education |
| ERC-A.4 | Heat Reduction in the Public Realm |
| ERC-A.5 | Bus Shelter Design |
| ERC-A.7 | Cooling Landscape Standards |
| ERC-A.9 | Minimum Tree Requirements |
| ERC-A.10 | Parking Lot Shading Ordinance |
| FB-ERC-1 | Tree Planting and Maintenance |
| EJ-1.3 | Data-Informed Efforts |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| EJ-3.4 | Healthy Environment |
| AA-EJ-1 | Tree Planting in Parking Lots |
| NS-EJ-2 | Tree Planting |
| M-1.32 | Supportive Infrastructure in the Public Right-of-Way |
| M-3.1 | Local Streets |
| M-3.2 | Street Design |
| NS-M-1 | Street Extensions |
| YPRO-1.20 | Climate Resilient Design |
| Walkability | |
| LUP-1.1 | Compact Urban Footprint |
| LUP-4.9 | Enhanced Pedestrian Environment |
| LUP-4.14 | Elimination of Vehicle Parking Minimums |
| LUP-5.1 | Evolving Regional Commercial Centers |
| LUP-5.2 | Shopping Centers as Focal Points |
| LUP-5.3 | Mixed-Use Neighborhood Centers |
| LUP-6.12 | Reconnecting Communities |
| LUP-8.1 | Unique Sense of Place |
| LUP-8.9 | People-Friendly Design |
| LUP-8.12 | Design of Privately-Developed Public Spaces |
| CC-LUP-8 | Temporary Alley Closures |
| SN-LUP-2 | Northgate Boulevard Placemaking |
| HCR-1.7 | Contextual Features |
| ERC-3.11 | Planting |
| ERC-A.4 | Heat Reduction in the Public Realm |
| M-1.4 | Designing to Move People |
| M-1.5 | Street Design Standards |
| M-1.7 | Fine-Grained Network |
| M-1.8 | Vacation of Public Right-of-Way |
| M-1.13 | Walkability |
| M-1.14 | Walking Facilities |
| M-1.15 | Improve Walking Connectivity |
| M-1.16 | Barrier Removal |
| M-1.19 | Walking Safety |
| M-3.1 | Local Streets |
| M-3.2 | Street Design |
| M-3.3 | Traffic |
| M-3.4 | Cul-de-Sacs |
| M-3.5 | Open Street Events |
| M-3.6 | Outdoor Dining Program |
| M-A.7 | Roadway Reallocations |
| ES-M-1 | Sacramento State Pedestrian Connections |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| FB-M-3 | Pedestrian Environment |
| NS-M-3 | Walking Improvements and Connections |
| NS-M-6 | Street Improvements |
| SN-M-3 | American River Parkway Connections |
| YPRO-1.1 | Range of Experiences |
| YPRO-2.3 | School Facilities |
| YPRO-A.1 | Youth, Parks, & Community Enrichment (YPCE) Parks Plan Update |
| FB-YPRO-3 | Granite Regional Park Pedestrian Access |
| FB-YPRO-4 | George Sim Park Access |
| LP-YPRO-3 | City Cemetery Pedestrian Access |
| SA-YPRO-2 | Franklin Boyce Park Access |
| SA-YPRO-3 | Joint Use Agreements |
| SN-YPRO-1 | Gardenland Park Access |
| SN-YPRO-2 | Walter S. Ueda Parkway Access |
| SN-YPRO-3 | Garden Highway Crossings |
| SN-YPRO-6 | Connections to East Levee Road Trails |
| Water Conservation | |
| LUP-11.2 | Balanced Local Water Cycle |
| ERC-1.1 | Clean Water Programs |
| ERC-1.2 | Clean Watershed |
| ERC-1.3 | Runoff Contamination |
| ERC-1.4 | Construction Site Impacts |
| ERC-1.5 | Drinking Water Data |
| ERC-1.6 | Groundwater Management |
| ERC-2.1 | Conservation of Water Resources Open Space Areas |
| ERC-2.2 | Biological Resources |
| ERC-2.5 | Environmental Awareness |
| ERC-3.9 | Watering and Irrigation |
| ERC-5.1 | Active Water Conservation Program |
| ERC-5.3 | Water Efficiency Training |
| ERC-5.4 | Municipal Energy and Water Efficiency |
| ERC-5.5 | Publicize Voluntary Programs |
| ERC-5.7 | Onsite Water Reuse |
| PFS-4.1 | Exercise and Protect Water Rights |
| PFS-4.2 | Water Supply Sustainability |
| PFS-4.3 | Surface Water Supply |
| PFS-4.4 | Groundwater Infrastructure |
| PFS-4.5 | Comprehensive Water Supply Planning |
| PFS-4.6 | Recycled Water |
| NUMBER | DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| PFS-4.7 | Water Supply During Emergencies |
| PFS-4.8 | New Development |
| PFS-A.4 | Stormwater Master Planning |
| PFS-A.5 | Onsite Non-Potable Water Reuse |
| Youth | |
| LUP-9.5 | Arts Education |
| E-4.3 | Educational Attainment |
| E-A.3 | Paid and Volunteer Job Programs |
| E-A.6 | Workforce Preparedness Program |
| SN-ED-1 | Youth Workforce Development |
| ERC-2.5 | Environmental Awareness |
| EJ-2.18 | Youth Food Literacy |
| EJ-A.3 | DAC Representation |
| M-2.7 | Free or Discounted Transit Passes |
| YPRO-2.3 | School Facilities |
| YPRO-2.4 | Library Services |
| YPRO-2.7 | Child/Older Adult Care |
| YPRO-3.5 | Youth Participation |
| YPRO-A.1 | Youth, Parks, & Community Enrichment (YPCE) Parks Plan Update |
| YPRO-A.2 | Park Audits |
| YPRO-A.4 | Youth Internships |
| YPRO-A.5 | Violence Prevention and Youth Development |
| LP-YPRO-5 | Pool Access |
| PG-YPRO-4 | Pool and Neighborhood Center Access |
| SA-YPRO-6 | Food-Anchored Resiliency Hubs |
This page left intentionally blank