OpenPublica
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA · GENERAL PLAN INTRODUCTION

Introduction

40 pages
Government
Sacramento, California
Covers
general plan introduction
Pages
40
Verified
2026-08-22
Pages 1–40

⬚ figure

SACRAMENTO 2040 GENERAL PLAN

PART 1

Introduction to the 2040 General Plan and Sustainability and Equity

⬚ figure

Prepared for: City of SACRAMENTO

Prepared by: DYETT & BHATIA Urban and Regional Planners

⬚ figure

PART 1: Introduction to the 2040 General Plan and Sustainability and Equity

Table of Contents

1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................................... 1-1

Sacramento Profile .................................................................................................................................................. 1-2 Scope and Purpose of the General Plan ............................................................................................................ 1-3 Planning Area ............................................................................................................................................................ 1-6 Planning Context ...................................................................................................................................................... 1-9 General Plan Update Process ...............................................................................................................................1-11 Vision ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1-14 General Plan Organization.................................................................................................................................... 1-15 How to Use the General Plan............................................................................................................................... 1-18

2 Sustainability and Equity...................................................................................................................2-1

Recent City Initiatives.............................................................................................................................................. 2-2 Indicators.................................................................................................................................................................... 2-2

List of Maps

Map 1-1: Regional Location............................................................................................................................................... 1-7 Map 1-2: Planning Area..................................................................................................................................................... 1-8

List of Figures

Figure 1-1: General Plan Pyramid ................................................................................................................................... 1-3

List of Tables

Table 1-1: Correspondence Between State-Mandated Elements and General Plan Chapters .......................... 1-5 Table 1-2: Policy Index..................................................................................................................................................... 1-19 Table 2-1: Indicators ........................................................................................................................................................... 2-3

⬚ figure

1

INTRODUCTION

Sacramento is a diverse and welcoming city with a rich history, strategic location within the Central Valley, and a bright future. The city is a historic community deeply rooted in the story of California and a dynamic modern destination that is a regional hub for business, arts, culture, and innovation. Sacramento is one of the fastest growing cities in California, located in one of the most livable regions in the U.S.

Looking to the future, Sacramento is projected to add 69,000 new homes and 77,000 new jobs by 2040. For the community to continue to flourish, Sacramento will need to ensure that this growth happens in ways that are both sustainable and equitable. This will mean promoting a compact development pattern with new growth strategically concentrated to support efficient delivery of public services and infrastructure and to reduce vehicle miles traveled and greenhouse gas emissions. Equally, it will require a focus on fostering complete neighborhoods that provide for residents' daily needs within easy walking or biking distance from home and that offer a range of housing types to suit the needs of people of all ages and at all stages of life. It will also mean building community resilience in the face of climate change, forging inclusive economic development, and taking action to address the inequities of past practices so that everyone has an opportunity to achieve their full potential in Sacramento. In rising to meet these challenges and turning them into opportunities for an even brighter future, the Sacramento 2040 General Plan seeks to foster a more sustainable, equitable, and prosperous city for all.

Sacramento Profile

The capital of California since 1854, Sacramento is a modern city and the metropolis of a region that encompasses El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo, and Yuba counties. Its location in the fertile Central Valley at the confluence of the Sacramento and American Rivers allowed farming, food processing, and transportation to play a pivotal role in the early development of the community. Today, food and agriculture continue to be important drivers of the local economy. Increasingly, innovation and technology are shaping economic and community development in Sacramento and there is a growing number of companies involved in high-tech manufacturing, software development, biotechnology, and medical research. The city is home to numerous top-ranked post-secondary educational institutions that are valuable contributors of ideas and talent, and it is an important regional transportation hub, served by an international airport, a deep-water shipping port, two major interstate freeways, freight and passenger rail lines, and an extensive regional commuter bus and light rail system.

Sacramento has a diverse and growing population. The city has seen sustained population growth over decades, and between 2010 and 2020, Sacramento added 44,000 new residents, a robust increase over a period that includes the Great Recession years. This growth has been fueled in large part by an out-migration from the San Francisco Bay Area spurred by rapidly rising housing costs and accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Immigration from overseas also contributes, with new residents arriving from Asia, Central America, and Europe, with Mexico, the Philippines, India, China, Ukraine, and Russia chief among them. In 2020, nearly 55 percent of the population identified as Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC), non-white. Between 2010 and 2020, population increased to approximately 500,000, but the age composition stayed roughly the same. Sacramento boasts a rich cultural offering too, home to an active and historic Downtown, numerous world-class performing arts venues and professional sports teams, and a burgeoning creative arts scene. The walkable streets and historic homes of Midtown attract visitors to Sacramento, and riverfront open spaces offer an array of recreational activities and amenities.

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

Scope and Purpose of the General Plan

WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN

The 2040 General Plan was adopted in compliance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 65300. The General Plan is a legal document and much of its content is established by statutory requirements relating to background data, analysis, maps, and exhibits. The legal adequacy of the General Plan is critical, since many City actions and programs are required to be consistent with the General Plan.

California Government Code section 65300 requires each city and county to adopt a General Plan “for the physical development of the county or city, and any land outside its boundaries which... bears relation to its planning.” The Sacramento General Plan can be considered a blueprint for development and conservation — a set of policies that guide the City’s land use and capital investment decisions for the next two decades. The Sacramento General Plan serves to:

  • Establish a long-range vision that reflects the aspirations of the community and outlines steps to achieve it;
  • Guide decision-making related to development, housing, transportation, environmental quality, public services, parks, open space, and agricultural conservation;
  • Help Sacramento achieve compliance with applicable State and regional policies, including housing production and environmental regulations
  • Allow City departments, other public agencies, and private developers to design projects that will enhance the community, preserve environmental resources, and minimize hazards; and
  • Provide the basis for establishing and setting priorities for detailed programs, such as the Planning and Development Code and future specific plans.

Due to the broad and long-range nature of the General Plan, there will be instances where more detailed studies will be necessary to implement the General Plan’s policies, as illustrated in Figure I-1.

Figure I-1

General Plan Pyramid

⬚ figure

GENERAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS

California grants local authorities power over land use decisions. As a result, cities have considerable flexibility in preparing their general plans so long as State requirements are met. The California Government Code establishes both the content of general plans and rules for their adoption and subsequent amendment. Together, state law and judicial decisions establish three overall guidelines for general plans. General plans should be:

  • Comprehensive. The general plan must be geographically comprehensive, applying throughout the entire incorporated area and the Sphere of Influence. The general plan must also address the full range of issues that affect the city’s physical development.
  • Internally Consistent. The general plan must fully integrate its separate parts and relate them to each other without conflict. “Horizontal” consistency applies as much to figures and diagrams as to the general plan text. It also applies to data and analysis as well as policies. All adopted portions of the general plan, whether required by state law or not, have equal legal weight. None may supersede another, so the general plan must resolve conflicts among the provisions of each element.
  • Long Range. Because anticipated development will affect the city and the people who live, work, and study here for years to come, state law requires every general plan to take a long-term perspective. This General Plan uses the year 2040 as its planning horizon.

The Sacramento General Plan contains four parts: Part 1: Introduction to the 2040 General Plan and Sustainability and Equity; Part 2: Citywide Goals and Policies; Part 3: Community Plans and Special Study Areas; and Part 4: Administration and Implementation. As shown on Table I-1, the General Plan covers all eight “elements” required under state law — land use, circulation, housing, conservation, open space, noise, safety, and environmental justice — in addition to several optional elements of local importance to the community, including economic development, and historic and cultural resources. All elements, regardless of whether they are mandatory or optional, carry equal weight.

Housing Elements are required by state law to be updated more frequently than the General Plan, and to facilitate that, the City publishes its Housing Element under a separate cover. The City of Sacramento Housing Element was most recently adopted in 2021, and will be next updated in 2029, consistent with the State-defined cycle. State law also requires that implementation of the General Plan be “vertically” consistent, meaning all actions related to zoning, subdivision approval, housing allocations, and capital improvements must be consistent with the General Plan.

⬚ figure

Table 1-1: Correspondence Between State-Mandated Elements and General Plan Chapters

Part/ChapterState Required ElementsOptional Elements
Part 1: Introduction to the 2040 General Plan and Sustainability and Equity
1. Introduction--
2. Sustainability and Equity--
Part 2: Citywide Goals and Policies
3. Land Use and PlacemakingLand Use
4. Historic and Cultural Resources--Historic Preservation
5. Economic Development--Economic Development
6. Environmental Resources and ConstraintsConservation, Noise, Safety (Hazards)Air Quality
7. Environmental JusticeEnvironmental JusticeAir Quality, Community Health
8. MobilityCirculation (Transportation)
9. Public Facilities and SafetyCirculation (Utilities/Facilities), Safety (Fire/Emergency)
10. Youth, Parks, Recreation, & Open SpaceOpen Space
Part 3: Community Plans and Special Study Areas
11. Community Plans & Special Study Areas--
Part 4: Administration and Implementation
12. Implementation
Appendices
Appendix A: Vision & Guiding Principles
Appendix B: Glossary & Acronyms
Appendix C: Photograph/Illustration Credits

Planning Area

REGIONAL LOCATION

Sacramento is located in the northern part of the Central Valley, roughly halfway between San Francisco to the west and Lake Tahoe to the east. Major highways providing regional access to and through Sacramento include Interstate 80 and U.S. Highway 50 (east/west), and Interstate 5 and U.S. Highway 99 (north/south). Amtrak serves Sacramento’s passenger rail needs, while Sacramento International Airport provides domestic and international flights through most major airlines. Within the city and surrounding region, Sacramento Regional Transit (SacRT) is the primary transit provider of bus and light rail service. The regional location of the planning area is shown on Map I-1.

PLANNING AREA

The planning area is defined as the land area addressed by the General Plan, including land within City limits, the Sphere of Influence (SOI) outside City limits, and Special Study Areas; all of which are subsequently discussed. The planning area comprises approximately 113,572 acres (197 square miles) of incorporated and unincorporated land, encompassing land within City limits, the SOI, and five special study areas as shown on Map I-2. The planning area boundary was determined in response to state law, which requires each city to include all territory within the boundaries of the incorporated area as well as “any land outside its boundaries which in the planning agency’s judgement bears relation to its planning,”1 within the general plan planning area. While the City only has jurisdiction within City limits, it can establish future land use and zoning in the SOI to indicate desired uses and intensity in the event of future annexation.

City Limits

The City limits encompasses approximately 64,425 acres (101 square miles) of incorporated land within the legal jurisdiction of the City of Sacramento. The existing uses within the City limits include residential, commercial, and industrial developments, as well as public facilities including parks, schools, and hospitals.

⬚ figure

Sphere of Influence (SOI)

The SOI is an area outside of Sacramento’s jurisdictional boundary, or City limits, that designates the City’s probable future boundary and service area. Sacramento’s SOI encompasses 14,018 acres (22 square miles) outside of City limits. The Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) has jurisdiction over defining Sacramento’s SOI and acts on annexations and the approval of service contracts outside City limits. The purpose of the SOI is to coordinate and shape logical and orderly development while discouraging urban sprawl and the premature conversion of agricultural and open space lands by preventing overlapping jurisdictions and duplication of services. While the LAFCo cannot tell agencies what their planning goals should be, on a regional level, the LAFCo for each California county helps coordinate efficient provision of services for the benefit of area residents and property owners.

Special Study Areas

The planning area also includes five special study areas: the Natomas Basin Study Area, the Arden Arcade Study Area, the East Study Area, the Fruitridge/Florin Study Area, and the Town of Freeport Study Area. These are unincorporated locations adjacent to City limits where careful coordination between the City and the County is required to plan for natural resource protection and the efficient delivery of services. Collectively, the special study areas total approximately 47,610 acres (74 square miles), approximately 74 percent of which lies outside City limits and the SOI.

Footnotes

  1. 1 California Government Code Section 65300.

Map I-1

Regional Location

⬚ figure

Map I-2

Planning Area

⬚ figure

![symbol]Sacramento City Limit
![symbol]Sphere of Influence
![symbol]Special Study Areas
![symbol]County Boundary
![symbol]Airports
Existing Light Rail Station
Proposed Light Rail Station
![symbol]Existing Light Rail Line
![symbol]Proposed Light Rail Extension
![symbol]Highways
![symbol]Major Roads
![symbol]Railroads
![symbol]Water

Source: City of Sacramento GIS, 2023; Dyett & Bhatia, 2023

⬚ figure

Aerial view of Southern Pacific Railroad passenger station, ca. 1925-1926

Planning Context

HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT PATTERN

Sacramento’s early and modern settlements were shaped by its geographic features, including the Sacramento and American rivers, and its verdant flora and fauna. The Sacramento Valley was first settled by Nisenan (Southern Maidu) and Plains Miwok Native Americans. Archaeological and linguistic studies show that the region’s earliest inhabitants were hunter-gatherers who subsisted on acorns, seeds, and other plants, as well as land animals and fish; they practiced religion, built villages with distinct architecture, and manufactured a wide variety of tools and crafts.

European exploration into the Sacramento Valley began in the early 1800s via colonization and the establishment of missions. One of these explorers, a Spaniard name Gabriel Moraga is responsible for naming the valley region “Sacramento,” which means “the Holy Sacrament.” In 1839, John Sutter established Sutter’s Fort on a land grant from the Mexican government, in what was, at the time, Nisenan territory.

After the discovery of gold in the Sierras, Sacramento quickly became a transportation hub for prospectors and supplies on their way to the gold fields. Sutter had an official plan for the city prepared and the citizens of Sacramento adopted a City charter in 1849. In 1850, Sacramento became the first incorporated city in California. During the California Gold Rush and through the 1800s, the city’s location along the river ports, and later the railroad, played a prominent role in making Sacramento a major distribution point; a commercial and agricultural center; a terminus for wagon trains, stagecoaches, riverboats, the telegraph, the Pony Express, and the First Transcontinental Railroad; and in 1854, the state capital of California. Rail expansion continued in the late 19th century and early 20th century, facilitating local as well as regional travel. Battery operated streetcars were introduced in 1891, and in an era before the automobile, development of the city’s first suburbs followed streetcar lines. By 1911, Sacramento had eight streetcar lines. The “streetcar suburbs” to the east and south, including Land Park, Curtis Park, Oak Park, Tahoe Park and East Sacramento, had an estimated population of 15,000 and were annexed into the City, thereby tripling the city’s land area.

Following World War II, Sacramento began a period of unprecedented growth aided by the growing post-war economy, strong housing demand, and the national trend toward suburbanization. From 1946 to 1970, the City of Sacramento added nearly 60,000 acres of land in the Natomas, Northgate, Gardenland, and North Sacramento areas, expanding almost seven times its 1945 size of just over 9,000 acres. This massive post-war expansion was made possible by the dramatic growth in automobile ownership and the development of freeways, such as Interstates 80 and 5 and U.S. 50, which allowed

quick travel to once outlying areas. The freeways, however, also disrupted existing neighborhoods and displaced residents, as land was cleared for this new infrastructure and new barriers were created between historically connected neighborhoods. With the advent of the automobile, neighborhoods became less dense and blocks grew larger, scaled to the speed of a car rather than the pedestrian. Land uses became more segregated, increasing Sacramento’s car dependence. As many residents moved out to the new suburbs, retailers followed them and built a new kind of development suited to the suburban lifestyle: the shopping mall. In 1954, Sacramento’s first large shopping mall, Country Club Shopping Center, opened. This was soon followed by others such as Southgate and Florin Center and then by smaller strip malls along commercial corridors in subsequent decades.

Annexation of the Pocket and the Natomas areas led to significant population growth throughout the 1970s, ‘80s, ‘90s and into the early 2000s. In tandem with post-war suburban development, redevelopment in Downtown Sacramento resulted in a dramatic decrease in population. Urban renewal projects saw properties condemned as “blighted.” These properties were expropriated from homeowners and tenants in order to facilitate demolition, which effectively removed entire non-White communities from the downtown area, particularly the West End (an area west of the State Capitol redeveloped in the 1950s/60s). However, revisions to the Capitol Area Plan in 1977 and 1997 ushered in new mixed-use and residential developments that have helped revitalize the central city. The expansion of the light rail system in the mid-2000s has also created new opportunities for transit-oriented development along extensions of the SacRT Blue and Gold Lines. More recently, the advent of online shopping and e-commerce have resulted in a reduced demand for physical retail space, and there are opportunities to reimagine some older shopping centers.

⬚ figure

GENERAL PLAN EVOLUTION

Smart growth principles have long been central to long-range planning in Sacramento. In 1988, the City adopted a General Plan that laid out a set of smart growth principles to guide sustainable and balanced development that makes efficient and effective use of land resources and existing infrastructure. In 2009, a comprehensive update (2030 General Plan) carried these principles forward with a focus on promoting infill development and reuse of underutilized properties, as well as on intensifying development near transit and mixed-use activity centers. An important theme of the 2030 General Plan was “Living Lightly” and it incorporated strategies to reduce Sacramento’s carbon footprint as well as a program calling for the City to prepare and adopt a climate action plan, which was subsequently adopted in two phases in 2010 and 2012. A technical update to the General Plan was adopted in 2015 (the 2035 General Plan), which incorporated the Climate Action Plan into the General Plan and refreshed the Technical Background Report. The 2040 General Plan is the most current iteration of this comprehensive planning document.

General Plan Update Process

In 2019, the City embarked on a comprehensive update of the General Plan to guide Sacramento in its next era of growth and development in a sustainable and equitable manner. The General Plan Update focused on updating policies and programs to reflect changed conditions and priorities and to address new state laws. Important cornerstones of the 2040 General Plan Update include a focus on Sacramento’s neighborhoods, a new environmental justice element as required by California Government Code 65302(h), and bold action to address an accelerating climate crisis. In parallel, a new Climate Action and Adaptation Plan was prepared to establish Sacramento as a leader in climate action.

The General Plan Update process involved four main phases. Phase 1 focused on identifying issues and opportunities to address in updating the General Plan and culminated in a Vision and Guiding Principles, adopted by City Council in November 2019, that describe Sacramento’s shared values and its aspirations for the future. Phase 2 explored key strategies necessary to achieve the vision. The strategies were refined through input from community members and decision-makers and distilled into a preferred plan concept and key strategies to guide preparation of the 2040 General Plan. Phase 3 saw the creation of draft goals, policies, and implementing actions based on the approved vision and key strategies from prior phases. Phase 4 involved public review of the draft documents, additional community outreach to raise awareness in the community and solicit feedback on the draft documents, and formal hearings before the Planning and Design Commission and the City Council prior to adoption of the plans and certification of the Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR).

⬚ figure

MILESTONE DOCUMENTS

The update process involved the preparation of several documents: the Policy Document, Technical Background Report, and Master Environmental Impact Report.

Policy Document. The Policy Document is the essence of the General Plan. It contains the goals, policies, and implementing actions that will guide City decision-making and investments for the next two decades. The Policy Document was revised comprehensively to reflect extensive community input on issues, opportunities, and priorities as well as to address new state law.

Technical Background Report. Along with the Policy Document, the Technical Background Report will be part of the General Plan. This document does not represent adopted City policy, but it provides a profile and analysis of existing conditions and trends within Sacramento and the surrounding area as of 2018; it addresses several State planning law requirements for general plans; and it provides a foundation for policy in the Policy Document. It also serves as the environmental setting for the MEIR; however, it is not part of the MEIR. The Technical Background Report was published in November 2020 and is available on the City’s website.

Master Environmental Impact Report

In parallel with the General Plan Update, the City is also preparing a MEIR. The purpose of the MEIR is to identify and evaluate the potentially significant impacts that could occur as a result of the adoption and implementation of the 2040 General Plan, including cumulative effects, growth-inducing effects, and irreversible significant effects on the environment.

The City Council reviews and considers the MEIR during the General Plan Update process to understand the potential environmental implications associated with implementing the General Plan. The MEIR is not part of the General Plan; however, it is intended to streamline project-level California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review for subsequent projects that are consistent with the General Plan.

Additionally, the following supporting documents are incorporated by reference into the 2040 General Plan: the City of Sacramento Annex to the Sacramento County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP); and the Sacramento Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP), including the Vulnerability Assessment it contains. Copies of all referenced materials are available for review at the City of Sacramento Community Development Department and on the City’s website.

COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

Community involvement was an integral and ongoing component of the General Plan Update process; a particular focus was on outreach to disadvantaged and linguistically isolated communities. The ideas and feedback gathered through the community outreach process directly informed the vision set forth in this General Plan and the strategies incorporated to achieve it. Major outreach efforts included:

  • Stakeholder Interviews: At the beginning of the project work, a series of interviews was conducted with a variety of local stakeholders, including property owners, advocacy groups, developers, business owners, public agency staff, elected officials, and others. These interviews elicited candid input on planning issues and provided a broad sense of the major issues of concern and desired outcomes for the General Plan Update.
  • Phase 1 Citywide Workshops: Broad-based community engagement for the General Plan Update kicked off with a series of citywide workshops in different locations throughout the community. The purpose of these workshops were to build awareness about the project and to solicit input from community members on critical issues and opportunities for Sacramento, especially mobility, land use, climate change, and environmental justice. As part of this outreach, the City also conducted a series of pop-up events in hard-to-reach communities and created a toolkit for community members and neighborhood organizations to host their own self-led “meetings in a box” to share their ideas and proposals for the future of the city. Input from these activities was used to craft the General Plan’s Vision and Guiding Principles and to inform all subsequent planning work.
  • Phase 1 Community Plan Workshops: After establishing the Vision and Guiding Principles, the focus shifted to Sacramento’s neighborhoods with a series of workshops held in each of the 10 Community Plan areas. At these workshops, residents participated in small group discussions to identify neighborhood-specific priorities and issues.
  • Interest-Based Focus Groups: At the beginning of Phase 2, meetings were held with neighborhood associations, advocacy groups, and other stakeholder groups to assess and refine key strategies for land use, mobility, and climate change; incorporate unique stakeholder perspectives; and build common, collaborative ground.
  • Phase 2 Citywide Workshops: Amid the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, a virtual citywide workshop ran from May-June 2020 through the City’s website. The virtual workshop presented the key strategies for the 2040 General Plan which were developed based on the adopted Vision and Guiding Principles and community input. Informational videos and interactive online activities in English, Spanish, and Mandarin Chinese, were used to solicit feedback. Working with local high schools, youth ambassadors from a variety of cultural and linguistic backgrounds were recruited to help their linguistically isolated relatives and neighbors participate in the virtual workshop activities.

⬚ figure

  • Scientific Survey: As part of Phase 2 outreach activities, a scientific survey was conducted by a professional polling firm to gauge support for the key strategies from a statistically valid sample of the population.

  • Phase 2 Community Plan Workshops: The second round of meetings on the Community Plan Areas were conducted virtually, given COVID-19 safety protocols. These meetings included an online interactive workshop series focused on neighborhood-specific strategies for each of the 10 Community Plan Areas.

  • Youth Engagement Program: Through a three-month long summer program, youth representatives developed an informational video and online questionnaire about Sacramento’s future approach to climate change issues, collecting more than 300 responses from local residents and helping to inform the early direction of the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan.

  • Environmental Justice Working Group: An Environmental Justice Working Group met throughout the planning process to provide insight on how historic practices have disproportionately impacted low-income and minority communities; share input on strategies for addressing these practices and their outcomes; and help refine policies and implementing actions related to environmental justice and equity for inclusion in the General Plan Update. The group was comprised of more than 25 representatives from community-based organizations, public agencies, and other participants who work to foster equity and inclusion within Sacramento.

  • Phase 4 Community Outreach: In Phase 4, the Public Review Draft of the General Plan was released for public review. To support the public review process, additional outreach was conducted to raise awareness in the community, build understanding of the content of the proposed plans, and solicit community feedback to present to City decision-makers. Phase 4 Community Outreach. Community engagement activities included webinars, a several months-long virtual open house, and pop-up events around the community with a focus on harder to reach areas.

  • Decision-Maker Meetings: Meetings with both the Planning and Design Commission and the City Council were held at key milestones in the process to report on progress and receive direction for the upcoming phase. Specific input was also sought from various commissions such as the Active Transportation Commission, Parks and Community Enrichment Commission, Preservation Commission, the Sacramento Youth Commission, and the Disabilities Advisory Commission.

⬚ figure

Vision

The guiding Vision of the General Plan, as adopted by City Council in November 2019, was crafted from extensive Phase 1 community input. The accompanying Guiding Principles can be found in Appendix A of the General Plan.

In 2040, the City of Sacramento will be a national model of sustainable, equitable growth and community development.

Sacramento will continue to be a dynamic regional center of culture, diversity, jobs, food, and beautiful parks and trees, and will cultivate inclusive access to opportunity and healthy living. The General Plan seeks to direct growth and change into commercial and transit corridors, building on the city’s existing assets and character. Pedestrian, bicycle and transit options will be prioritized over automobiles.

Every neighborhood will be a desirable place to live, with safe streets, extensive tree canopy, a range of housing choices, mixed-use neighborhood centers, great schools, parks and recreation facilities, and convenient connections to jobs, services, and nature. Every resident will feel the freedom to walk and bike safely and comfortably. Sacramento’s neighborhoods will be affordable and inclusive, and every resident will have the opportunity to thrive.

As California’s capital, Sacramento will continue to be a primary center for government, employment, education, and culture. The city’s economy will continue to strengthen, diversify, and participate in changing global industries.

Sacramento will be a leader in bold, equitable climate action and the green economy, taking steps to cut waste, pollution, and carbon emissions. Through its continued progress toward

⬚ figure

Sacramento’s 2045 climate neutrality goal, the city will also achieve other, interconnected goals: healthy, climate-safe homes, green spaces and tree canopy for all, an efficient zero-emissions transportation system, clean air, and a thriving, sustainable economy. Recognizing the future challenges of climate change, Sacramento will build resilience for all its communities, especially the most vulnerable.

Sacramento will ensure that residents of all ages and abilities have access to a range of reliable, environmentally responsible transportation options. Sacramento will invest in its aging infrastructure and prioritize carbon-neutral transport, and will have clean air, water, and “complete” streets. Sacramento will also invest in its human capital today, prioritizing investment in youth, the adults and leaders of 2040.

Sacramento will ensure the just and equitable treatment of all neighborhoods and people, address historical inequities, and ensure broad community participation and ownership in public processes, as well as accountability in implementing plans. Sacramento will continue to celebrate its cultural and ethnic diversity and will foster the arts, protect historic, cultural, and natural resources, and cultivate its extensive urban forest, parks and riverways.

⬚ figure

General Plan Organization

The 2040 General Plan addresses the eight state-mandated topics as well as several additional topics of local importance. The 2021-2029 Housing Element, which fulfills the state requirement for a certified housing element, was adopted in 2021 and published separately. The General Plan is organized into four parts, as follows:

PART 1: INTRODUCTION TO THE 2040 GENERAL PLAN AND SUSTAINABILITY AND EQUITY

  • Introduction. The Introduction contains the General Plan’s vision and guiding principles and an overview of its organization, and describes Sacramento’s regional location and planning boundaries, the planning process, how the 2040 General Plan relates to other plans and regulations, and how to use, revise, and amend the plan. This chapter also includes a policy index intended as a navigational aid to help users find policies and actions on key topics and themes quickly and easily.

  • Sustainability and Equity. This section discusses two themes that are integral to the 2040 General Plan and are woven throughout the General Plan: sustainability and equity. It includes a summary of key initiatives the City has already undertaken to address these themes. It also identifies a series of indicators that can be used to monitor toward the community wide objectives of the General Plan and help ensure that growth contributes incrementally to a more sustainable and equitable city.

PART 2: CITYWIDE GOALS AND POLICIES

The eight topical elements of the General Plan set out citywide goals and policies are as follows:

  • Land Use and Placemaking. This Element combines land use, a required topic by state law, and an additional topic that is a closely related priority for the community: placemaking. This Element describes the existing land use pattern and provides an explanation of the General Plan’s approach to citywide growth, presenting policies and standards for land use designations and development intensities, urban design, green building, arts, culture, and placemaking.

  • Historic and Cultural Resources. This Element covers historic and cultural resources, which is a topic of local importance. This Element describes preservation efforts to date, and presents policies for the preservation, adaptation, and reuse of historic and cultural resources.

  • Economic Development. This Element addresses a topic of local importance, providing an overview of the population and employment context in Sacramento, and outlining goals and policies to foster a dynamic local economy, innovation, business resilience, and inclusive economic development.

  • Environmental Resources and Constraints. This Element satisfies the legal requirements for addressing the topic of noise and identifies noise sources, quantifies future noise levels through a contour map, and establishes measures to address noise issues. It addresses the requirements for the conservation, including water, energy, vegetation, wildlife, and air to improve the environmental well-being of the community. It also addresses Safety Element requirements for community protection from wildfires, flooding, seismic events, dam inundation, and climate change.

  • Environmental Justice. This Element satisfies the legal requirements in planning for “disadvantaged communities” identified under Senate Bill (SB) 535 (2012, De Leon). Consistent with SB 1000 (2016), this element addresses the topics of air quality and pollution exposure; safe and sanitary homes; healthy food access; and civic engagement and investment prioritization.

  • Mobility. The Element satisfies the statutory requirements for the general plan circulation element in part, providing a circulation diagram that identifies the city’s major transportation routes and thoroughfares as well as a policy framework that seeks to balance walking, bicycling, transit service, and driving within an equitable, sustainable multimodal circulation system. It also addresses the regional movement of people and goods by road, rail, and air.

  • Public Facilities and Safety. This Element satisfies legal requirements for public safety related to urban fires as well as the location and extent of public utilities, including water, sewer, stormwater, and electricity. This Element also provides background information and a policy framework related to police and fire services, schools, and libraries.

  • Youth, Parks, Recreation, and Open Space. This Element satisfies the legal requirements for addressing open space for environmental and scenic conservation, as well as topics of community importance: youth, parks, and recreation.

⬚ figure

It includes background information and policies relating to youth programs, parks and recreation, and open space conservation and access.

PART 3: COMMUNITY PLANS AND SPECIAL STUDY AREAS

Part 3 of the General Plan provides policy direction for ten Community Plan Areas and five Special Study Areas. This part of the General Plan contains policies and procedures for maintaining the Community Plans in a manner consistent with the citywide goals and policies. The introduction to Part 3 is organized as follows:

  • Community Plans Overview
  • Community Plan Organizing Goal and Policies
  • Special Study Areas

The ten Community Plans are as follows:

  • Arden Arcade
  • Central City
  • East Sacramento
  • Fruitridge/Broadway
  • Greater Land Park
  • North Natomas
  • North Sacramento
  • Pocket/Greenhaven
  • South Area
  • South Natomas

The five Special Study Areas are as follows:

  • Arden Arcade Study Area
  • East Study Area
  • Fruitridge-Florin Study Area
  • Natomas Basin Study Area
  • Town of Freeport Study Area

PART 4: ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION

The Administration and Implementation part of the General Plan contains procedures for maintaining and carrying out the General Plan in a systematic and consistent manner. The Administration and Implementation part of the General Plan is organized as follows:

  • Introduction
  • Implementation Programs
  • General Plan Maintenance and Monitoring

POLICY STRUCTURE

Each element of this General Plan includes brief background information to establish the context for the goals and policies in the element. This background material is not a comprehensive statement of existing conditions. Each element also contains the goals, policies, and implementing actions that will be used by the City to guide future land use, development, and environmental protection decisions. Within this structure, Goals describe general desired results that the community seeks to create through the implementation of the General Plan. The Policies and Actions establish the “who,” “how,” and “when” for carrying out the “what” and “where” of Goals. Policies and implementing actions both support the Goals, described on the right.

APPENDICES

The following information is contained in Appendices A–C:

  • Vision & Guiding Principles

  • Glossary & Acronyms

  • Photograph/Illustration Credits

  • A goal is statement that describes a desired future condition or “end” state. Goals are intended to be broad statements of community aspirations.

  • A policy is a clear and unambiguous statement that guides a specific course of action for decision-makers to achieve a desired goal. General Plan policies guide City staff and decision-makers in their review of land development projects and in decision-making about City actions.

  • An implementing action is a measure, procedure, or technique intended to implement one or more policies to help reach a specified goal. Typically, an action is a discrete item done once and completed. For implementing actions, this Plan lists both the timeframe and responsible department/agencies for implementation.

⬚ figure

How to Use the General Plan

The City’s General Plan is intended for use by all members of the community including residents, businesses, developers, City staff, and decision-makers. The organization of the 2040 General Plan allows users to find topics or sections that interest them and to quickly review City policies; although, users should be aware that the policies throughout all elements are interrelated and should be examined comprehensively and must be considered together when making planning decisions.

For Sacramento residents, the General Plan indicates the general types of uses that are permitted throughout the city, the long-range plans and actions that may affect neighborhoods, and the policies the City will use to evaluate development applications. The General Plan indicates how the City will attract businesses that provide goods and services to meet daily needs and new jobs that are closely matched to educational skills and that lessen the need to commute. The General Plan informs residents how the City plans to improve mobility and transportation infrastructure, continue to provide adequate public services, and protect valued open spaces and environmental resources. Cumulatively, the General Plan identifies the actions the City will take to foster a more sustainable, equitable, and prosperous city for all.

For Sacramento businesses, the General Plan outlines the measures the City will take to protect investments and encourage future success. Expectations for the city’s business areas are spelled out, while policies ensure that business operations will be compatible with other businesses and nearby residential areas.

For developers within the city, or those moving homes or businesses to the city, the General Plan introduces the community, provides background information, and outlines development regulations. It is important to review all maps and policies throughout this General Plan and the Sacramento Planning and Development Code to get a complete perspective on how and where development may take place.

The General Plan is also a tool to help City staff, the Planning & Design Commission, other boards and commissions, and the City Council make land use and public investment decisions. Future development decisions must be consistent with the General Plan. Finally, the General Plan is also intended to help other public agencies, from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG), to local school districts, as they contemplate future actions in and around Sacramento.

POLICY INDEX

Many of the issues central to the 2040 General Plan cut across topics and, as such, are addressed in more than one Element. To help the user find policies and implementing actions related to these central themes quickly and easily, Table 1-2 summarizes them in an index organized by central themes. Under each topic, the related policy/action number is shown at left, with a short description of the policy/action content at right. Policy/Action numbers are keyed to the Element in which they appear.

⬚ figure

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
Active Transportation Network
LUP-1.1Compact Urban Footprint
LUP-2.2Interconnected City
LUP-2.5Design for Connectivity
LUP-4.1Transit-Supportive Development
LUP-4.9Enhanced Pedestrian Environment
LUP-4.10Multi-Modal Access
LUP-5.2Shopping Centers as Focal Points
LUP-5.3Mixed-Use Neighborhood Centers
LUP-8.1Unique Sense of Place
LUP-8.9People-Friendly Design
AA-LUP-1Cal Expo
CC-LUP-8Temporary Alley Closures
SA-LUP-4Corridor Revitalization
M-1.1Street Classification System
M-1.2User Prioritization
M-1.3Healthy Transportation System Options
M-1.4Designing to Move People
M-1.5Street Design Standards
M-1.6Transit Integration
M-1.7Fine-Grained Network
M-1.8Vacation of Public Right-of-Way
M-1.11Increase Bicycling and Walking
M-1.12Light Rail Transit (LRT) Station Access Improvements
M-1.13Walkability
M-1.14Walking Facilities
M-1.15Improve Walking Connectivity
M-1.16Barrier Removal
M-1.17Improve Bicycling Connectivity
M-1.18Bicycling Safety
M-1.19Walking Safety
M-2.9Advocacy and Events
M-2.10Curbside Management
M-3.2Street Design
M-4.1Application of Safety
M-4.2Safer Driving Speeds
M-4.3Vision Zero
M-4.4Collaborative Safety Solutions
M-4.5Safety-Related Training
NS-M-5High-Frequency Transit

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
M-4.8Detour Facilities
M-4.9Safe Routes to School
M-A.7Roadway Reallocations
M-A.9Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Ordinance
ES-M-1Sacramento State Pedestrian Connections
ES-TV-2Local Mobility Improvements
NS-M-1Roadway Reallocations
NS-M-2Bicycle Resources
PG-M-1Transit Connections
SN-M-3American River Parkway Connections
YPRO-1.15Path Connections
YPRO-1.16River Parkways
YPRO-2.3School Facilities
YPRO-2.4Library Services
YPRO-3.3Health Programming and Events
ES-YPRO-2Two Rivers Trail
FB-YPRO-3Granite Regional Park Pedestrian Access
FB-YPRO-4George Sim Park Access
LP-YPRO-3City Cemetery Pedestrian Access
SA-YPRO-2Franklin Boyce Park Access
SA-YPRO-3Joint Use Agreements
SN-YPRO-6Connections to East Levee Road Trails
Aesthetics
LUP-4.6Compatibility with Adjoining Uses
LUP-4.7Visual and Physical Character
LUP-4.15Vacant Property
LUP-4.16Compatibility Between Light Industrial and Residential Uses
LUP-5.1Evolving Regional Commercial Centers
LUP-6.4Neighborhood Form
LUP-6.5Established Neighborhoods
LUP-6.7Architectural Variations
LUP-7.5Industrial Aesthetics
LUP-8.1Unique Sense of Place
LUP-8.6Prominent Corner Architecture
LUP-8.7Distinctive Urban Skyline
LUP-8.8Iconic Sense of Place
LUP-8.9People-Friendly Design
LUP-8.10Responsiveness to Context
LUP-8.11Neighborhood and Transitions

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
LUP-8.13Continuity of Streetscape Design
LUP-8.14Streetscape Beautification
LUP-8.15Setbacks from Rivers and Creeks
SN-LUP-5Riverfront Landscaping
LUP-A.12Design Guidelines Update
NN-LUP-2Commercial Center Placemaking
NN-LUP-5Open Space Buffers
SN-LUP-2Northgate Boulevard Placemaking
PG-ED-1Freeport Boulevard Revitalization
HCR-1.7Contextual Features
HCR-1.3Compatibility with Historic Context
HCR-1.1Preservation of Historic and Cultural Resources, Landscapes, and Site Features
HCR-1.11Energy Retrofits of Historic Resources
YPRO-1.24Welcoming Amenities
YPRO-1.26Maintenance of Existing Facilities
SN-YPRO-6Connections to East Levee Road Trails
Air Quality
LUP-1.1Compact Urban Footprint
LUP-1.7Regional Growth Strategy
LUP-6.12Reconnecting Communities
HCR-1.19Access to Energy Retrofits
ERC-4.1Regional Coordination
ERC-4.2Air Quality Awareness
ERC-4.3Project Design
ERC-4.4Sensitive Uses
ERC-4.5Construction Emissions
ERC-4.6Gas-Powered Landscaping Equipment
ERC-4.7Operational Emissions
ERC-10.8Alternative Paving Materials
ERC-A.6Landscape Maintenance Ordinance
EJ-1.1Air Quality Monitoring
EJ-1.2Community Air Protection
EJ-1.3Data-Informed Efforts
EJ-1.4Impact Assessment
EJ-A.2Air Filtration Systems
EJ-A.5Amortization Ordinance
EJ-A.6Performance Zoning
AA-EJ-1Tree Planting in Parking Lots
M-1.27Electric Vehicle (EV) Strategy
M-1.28Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Capital

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
M-1.29Shared Zero-Emission Vehicles (ZEVs)
M-1.30Public Electric Vehicle (EV) Infrastructure Deployment
M-1.31Private Electric Vehicle (EV) Infrastructure Deployment
M-1.33Electric Vehicle (EV) Car Share and Electric Bike Share
M-1.34Electric Mobility (E-Mobility) Hubs
M-1.35Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV) First
M-1.36Electric Vehicles in New Development
M-1.37Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging in Existing Development
M-1.38Electric Vehicles (EVs), and Energy Resiliency
M-5.6Goods Movement Facilities
M-5.7Zero-Emission Fleets
M-5.8Zero-Emission Delivery
M-5.12Zero-Emission Aircraft
CC-M-2Employee Parking
City-Sponsored Educational Resources
LUP-9.1Cultural and Entertainment Centers
LUP-9.5Arts Education
LUP-11.4Community Education
HCR-1.3Compatibility with Historic Context
HCR-1.4Historic Districts
HCR-1.5Historic Surveys and Context Statements
HCR-1.13Indigenous Cultures
HCR-1.14Archaeological, Tribal, and Cultural Resources
HCR-1.16Endemic Traditions
HCR-1.17Evaluation of Archaeological Resources
HCR-A.4Historic Context Statements and Survey
HCR-A.8Conditions for Resource Discovery
HCR-A.9Native American Cultural Resources
LP-HCR-1Greater Land Park Historic Resources
NN-HCR-1Preservation of the Witter Ranch Historic Farm
E-1.5Technical Assistance
E-2.6Sustainable Business Programs
E-2.7Small Business/Startup Support
E-2.10Business-to-Business Commerce
E-4.5Labor Force Skills Development
E-4.8Entrepreneurship and Social Enterprise Training
E-4.9New Graduate Workforce Integration
E-A.1Prioritizing Digital Skills Training
E-A.2Aligning Education and Training

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
E-A.3Paid and Volunteer Job Programs
E-A.4Life-Long Learning
E-A.6Workforce Preparedness Program
ERC-2.4Native and Climate-Adapted Plants
ERC-2.5Environmental Awareness
ERC-3.8Public Education
ERC-4.2Air Quality Awareness
ERC-5.5Publicize Voluntary Programs
ERC-8.7Extreme Heat Education
ERC-8.8Heat Waves
ERC-A.2Tree Education
ERC-A.3CERT Training
EJ-1.10Education
EJ-5.1Equity Education
M-1.27Electric Vehicle (EV) Strategy
M-2.6Transit/Event Coordination
PFS-2.8Emergency Preparedness Programs
PFS-5.7Organic Waste Collection Services
YPRO-3.2Health Information
AA-YPRO-1Del Paso Regional Park Educational Programs
Climate Adaptation and Resiliency
LUP-1.1Compact Urban Footprint
LUP-4.14Elimination of Vehicle Parking Minimums
LUP-11.3Local Human and Ecological Context
LUP-A.6Future High-Frequency Transit Routes
LUP-A.8Beyond Climate Resiliency Measures
LUP-A.9Net-Zero Energy or Net-Positive Design
LUP-A.10Planning and Development Code Update
HCR-1.11Energy Retrofits and Historic Resources
HCR-1.19Access to Energy Retrofits
E-2.6Sustainable Business Programs
ERC-2.4Native and Climate-Adapted Plants
ERC-2.6Wetland Protection
ERC-2.7Annual Grasslands
ERC-2.8Wildlife Corridors
ERC-2.9Habitat Assessments
ERC-2.10Agency Coordination
ERC-2.11Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan
ERC-2.12Support Habitat Conservation Plan Efforts
ERC-2.13Climate Change-related Habitat Shifts

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
ERC-2.14Climate Change-related Habitat Restoration and Enhancement
ERC-3.10Parking Lot Shading
ERC-3.11Planting
ERC-5.6Renewable Energy
ERC-9.5Climate Change Assessment and Monitoring
ERC-9.6Resiliency Hubs
ERC-9.7Emergency Power
ERC-9.8Microgrid Energy Systems
ERC-9.9Onsite Alternative Energy Creation
ERC-9.11Neighborhood Resilience
ERC-9.12Regenerative Food System
ERC-A.4Heat Reduction in the Public Realm
ERC-A.5Bus Shelter Design
ERC-A.7Cooling Landscape Standards
ERC-A.8Heat Resilient Design Techniques
ERC-A.10Parking Lot Shading Ordinance
M-1.27Electric Vehicle (EV) Strategy
M-1.28Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Capital
M-1.29Shared Zero-Emission Vehicles (ZEVs)
M-1.30Public Electric Vehicle (EV) Infrastructure Deployment
M-1.31Private Electric Vehicle (EV) Infrastructure Deployment
M-1.32Supportive Infrastructure in the Public Right-of-Way
M-1.33Electric Vehicle (EV) Car Share and Electric Bike Share
M-1.34Electric Mobility (E-Mobility) Hubs
M-1.35Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV) First
M-1.36Electric Vehicles in New Development
M-1.37Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging in Existing Development
M-1.38Electric Vehicles (EVs) and Energy Resiliency
M-2.3Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as Metric
M-2.4Shared Shuttles
M-2.5Onsite Childcare
M-2.6Transit/Event Coordination
M-2.14Parking Supply
M-2.15Incentives for Zero-Emission Vehicles (ZEVs)
M-2.16Shared Parking
M-2.17Parking Management Strategy
M-2.18Technology to Optimize Parking Utilization
M-2.19Optimizing Residential Utilization
M-5.7Zero-Emission Fleets

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
M-5.8Zero Emission Delivery
M-5.12Zero-Emission Aircraft
M-A.5Regional Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Mitigation
M-A.9Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Ordinance
YPRO-1.20Climate Resilient Design
YPRO-3.8Cooling Centers
SN-YPRO-6Connections to East Levee Road Trails
Climate Change Mitigation
LUP-1.1Compact Urban Footprint
LUP-4.13Future-Ready Gas Stations
LUP-10.1Existing Structure Reuse
LUP-10.2Promote Green Buildings
LUP-11.1Net Positive Energy Future
LUP-11.2Balanced Local Water Cycle
LUP-11.7Building Materials
LUP-11.8Construction Processes
LUP-11.9Product Circularity
LUP-11.10Demonstration and Leadership
LUP-A.7Sustainability and Decarbonization Standards
LUP-A.10Planning and Development Code Update
HCR-1.11Energy Retrofits of Historic Resources
ERC-2.2Biological Resources
ERC-2.3Onsite Preservation
ERC-2.4Native and Climate-Adapted Plants
ERC-2.13Climate Change-related Habitat Shifts
ERC-2.14Climate Change-related Habitat Restoration and Enhancement
ERC-3.10Parking Lot Shading
ERC-3.11Planting
ERC-5.6Renewable Energy
ERC-9.1Communitywide GHG Reduction
ERC-9.2Additional GHG Emissions Program
ERC-9.3Lead by Example in Design of Buildings
ERC-9.4Carbon-Neutral Buildings
EJ-3.2Supplemental Funding Sources for Building Rehabilitation
EJ-3.4Healthy Environment
PFS-3.2Utility Sustainability
PFS-3.9Methane Recovery
YPRO-1.19Sustainable Design

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
SA-YPRO-6Food-Anchored Resiliency Hubs
Community Engagement and Collaboration
LUP-1.14Deed Notice
LUP-5.2Shopping Centers as Focal Points
LUP-9.3Assembly Facilities and Event Centers
LUP-11.5Human-Ecosystems Connection
LUP-11.6Community Connections
LUP-A.4Fruitridge-Florin Annexation
EJ-A.4Community-Led Planning
CC-LUP-2Local Retail
CC-LUP-3Old Sacramento Waterfront Community Uses
CC-LUP-4Old Sacramento Retail Visioning
CC-LUP-7Old Sacramento Cultural Arts District
NS-LUP-1Del Paso Boulevard Activation and Placemaking Improvements
NS-LUP-2Del Paso Creative Activation
NS-LUP-3Engage North of I-80
SA-LUP-13Coordination
PG-ED-1Freeport Boulevard Revitalization
HCR-1.6Early Project Consultation
HCR-1.13Indigenous Cultures
HCR-1.15Treatment of Native American Human Remains
HCR-1.16Endemic Traditions
HCR-1.17Evaluation of Archeological Resources
E-1.6Growth in Opportunity Areas
E-2.2Access to Capital
E-2.3Neighborhood Development Action Team
E-2.8Public Procurement
E-2.9Local Pilot Projects
E-2.10Business-to-Business Commerce
E-A.3Paid and Volunteer Job Programs
E-A.4Life-Long Learning
E-A.6Workforce Preparedness Program
E-A.7Development Incentives
ERC-1.1Clean Water Programs
ERC-4.2Air Quality Awareness
ERC-5.5Publicize Voluntary Programs
EJ-1.2Community Air Protection
EJ-1.9Household Hazardous Waste Collection Programs
EJ-2.3Open Air Food Sales
EJ-2.4Expanded Reach of Food Distribution

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
EJ-2.5Food Assistance Programs
EJ-2.6Food Recovery Program
EJ-2.7Partner with Farmers
EJ-2.11Home-Based Food Enterprises
EJ-2.13Public-Private Partnerships
EJ-2.17Healthy Food Promotion
EJ-2.18Youth Food Literacy
EJ-2.19Farm-to-Fork
EJ-4.1Meaningful Relevant Engagement
EJ-4.2Innovative Methods
EJ-4.3Community Partners
EJ-4.4Capacity Building
EJ-4.5Increasing Participation of Underserved Communities
EJ-4.6Community Oversight
EJ-4.7Sustained Engagement
EJ-4.8Community Ownership and Accountability
EJ-A.1Retailer Incentive Program
NS-EJ-1Neighborhood Clean Up
NS-EJ-2Tree Planting
M-2.2Wider Participation
M-2.5Onsite Childcare
M-2.6Transit/Event Coordination
M-2.9Advocacy and Events
M-4.4Collaborative Safety Solutions
M-A.2Online Truck Maps
PFS-1.2Community-Based Policing
PFS-1.3Communication with Residents and Businesses
PFS-1.4Community Programs
PFS-2.9Neighborhood Preparedness
PFS-6.1Access and Availability
PFS-6.2Public/Private Collaboration
SA-PFS-2Community Relations
YPRO-1.14Collaborative Efforts
YPRO-1.22Community Input
YPRO-1.27Volunteer Programs
YPRO-2.6Community Partnerships
YPRO-3.3Health Programming and Events
YPRO-3.4Activity Programming
YPRO-A.1Youth, Parks, & Community Enrichment (YPCE) Parks Plan Update
YPRO-A.2Park Audits

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
YPRO-A.5Violence Prevention and Youth Development
CC-YPRO-3Sacramento River Waterfront Recreation and Access
LP-YPRO-1William Land Park Improvements
LP-YPRO-2Zoo Site Redevelopment
SA-YPRO-6Food-Anchored Resiliency Hubs
Environmental Hazards
LUP-8.15Setbacks from Rivers and Creeks
NN-LUP-5Open Space Buffers
HCR-1.9Disaster Preparedness
HCR-1.19Access to Energy Retrofits
HCR-A.1Preservation Emergency Response
HCR-A.5Post-Disaster Plan
ERC-6.1Protection from Flood Hazards
ERC-6.2Flood Management Planning Coordination
ERC-6.3Floodway Capacity
ERC-6.4Floodplain Requirements
ERC-6.5Community Rating System
ERC-6.6Flood Regulations
ERC-6.7Flood Hazard Risk Evaluation
ERC-6.8Interagency Levee Management
ERC-6.9Levee and Floodway Encroachment Permit
ERC-6.10Levee Setbacks for New Development
ERC-6.11Unobstructed Access to Levees
ERC-6.12Flood Risk Notification
ERC-7.1Expansive Soils and Liquefaction
ERC-7.2Seismic Stability
ERC-8.1Cooling Design Techniques
ERC-8.2Large Heat Islands
ERC-8.3Urban Heat Pilots
ERC-8.4Municipal Cool Roof Retrofits
ERC-8.5Cool Libraries
ERC-8.6Heat-Reducing Public Amenities
ERC-8.7Extreme Heat Education
ERC-8.8Heat Waves
ERC-8.9Cooling Centers
ERC-A.3CERT Training
ERC-A.4Heat Reduction in the Public Realm
EJ-1.5Compatibility with Hazardous Materials Facilities
EJ-1.6Risk from Hazardous Materials Facilities
EJ-1.7Transportation Routes
EJ-1.8Site Contamination

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
EJ-1.9Household Hazardous Waste Collection Programs
EJ-1.10Education
PFS-1.6Fire Prevention Programs and Suppression
PFS-1.7Water Supply for Fire Suppression
PFS-1.8Fire Hazards
PFS-1.15Development Fees for Facilities and Services
PFS-1.16Development Review
PFS-2.1Hazard Mitigation Planning
PFS-2.2Critical Infrastructure
PFS-2.3Evacuation Routes
PFS-2.4Post-Disaster Response
PFS-2.5Communitywide Resilience
PFS-2.6Emergency Operations Center
PFS-2.7Emergency and Disaster Preparedness Exercises
PFS-2.8Emergency Preparedness Programs
PFS-2.9Neighborhood Preparedness
PFS-2.10Sacramento Alert
PFS-A.1Fire Department Strategic Plan
PFS-A.2Police Master Strategic Plan
NS-PFS-1Western Avenue Detention Pond
NS-PFS-2Historic Magpie Creek
NS-PFS-3Historic Magpie Creek Channel Modifications
NS-PFS-4Historic Magpie Creek Material Replacement
NS-PFS-5Historic Magpie Creek Enhancement
NS-PFS-6Historic Magpie Creek Support
SA-PFS-6Flood Control Improvements
SA-YPRO-5Laguna Floodplain Open Space
Equitable Access to Facilities, Services, and Amenities
LUP-2.8Co-Location of Community Facilities
LUP-2.9Expanded Emergency Care Facilities
LUP-6.12Reconnecting Communities
LUP-A.6Future High-Frequency Transit Routes
NS-LUP-3Engage North of I-80
SA-LUP-11Jacinto Creek Development
HRC-1.19Access to Energy Retrofits
E-1.6Growth in Opportunity Areas
E-2.1Investments for Inclusive, Equitable Growth
E-2.3Neighborhood Development Action Team
E-2.4Access to Labor and Jobs
E-3.5Local Business Coordination
E-A.3Paid and Volunteer Job Programs

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
E-A.4Life-Long Learning
ERC-1.1Clean Water Programs
ERC-1.5Drinking Water Data
ERC-2.5Environmental Awareness
ERC-3.8Public Education
ERC-4.2Air Quality Awareness
ERC-5.3Water Efficiency Training
ERC-5.5Publicize Voluntary Programs
ERC-6.5Community Rating System
ERC-8.6Heat-Reducing Public Amenities
ERC-A.2Tree Education
ERC-A.3CERT Training
EJ-A.4Community-Led Planning
EJ-A.9Community Input Database
M-1.9Equitable Processes and Outcomes
M-1.25First/Last-Mile Solutions
PFS-2.9Neighborhood Preparedness
YPRO-1.10Parkland Access Standard
YPRO-1.11Enhancing Access to Parks
YPRO-1.12Parks Programming
YPRO-2.1Access to Quality Public Facilities and Programs
YPRO-2.3School Facilities
YPRO-2.4Library Services
YPRO-3.5Youth Participation
YPRO-A.2Park Audits
YPRO-A.3Mobile Wellness Clinics
YPRO-A.4Youth Internships
NN-YPRO-2Organized Sports and Recreational Facilities
SN-YPRO-6Connections to East Levee Road Trails
Financing and Funding
LUP-1.2Logical Boundaries
LUP-1.9Advocacy
LUP-9.4Vibrant Arts Ecosystem
LUP-A.3Citywide Municipal Services Review
NN-LUP-3Financing Plan
NN-LUP-5Open Space Buffers
HCR-1.12Incentives for Rehabilitation and Adaptive Reuse of Historic Resources
HCR-1.19Access to Energy Retrofits
HCR-2.7Funding and Financing
HCR-A.6Incentives and Enforcement

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
E-2.2Access to Capital
E-2.3Neighborhood Development Action Team
E-3.3Small Business Lending
E-A.3Paid and Volunteer Job Programs
E-A.8Sustainable Procurement Policy
E-A.9Competitiveness Assessment
FB-ED-1Development Incentives
ERC-9.10Private Ventures
EJ-2.14Financial Incentives
EJ-3.2Supplemental Funding Sources for Building Rehabilitation
EJ-A.10Outreach Funding
EJ-A.11Healthy Food Initiatives Partnership
M-1.40Contributions from New Development
M-1.41Funding
M-2.15Incentives for Zero-Emission Vehicles (ZEVs)
M-A.1Transportation Investment Priorities
PFS-3.3Development Impacts
PFS-3.5Water Treatment Capacity and Infrastructure
PFS-3.7Rate and Fee Studies
NN-PFS-3Development Agreements
SA-PFS-3Infrastructure Financing
YPRO-1.4Parkland Dedication Requirements
YPRO-1.5Incentivizing Onsite Public Facilities
YPRO-1.27Fee Benchmarking
YPRO-1.28Leveraging Grant Funds
YPRO-1.29Park Finance Strategies
YPRO-A.5Violence Prevention and Youth Development
NS-YPRO-5Joint-Use Agreement
Healthy Built Environment
LUP-1.1Compact Urban Footprint
LUP-1.10Adjacent Development
LUP-2.1Overall Balance of Uses
LUP-4.14Elimination of Vehicle Parking Minimums
LUP-4.16Compatibility Between Light Industrial and Residential Uses
LUP-5.2Shopping Centers as Focal Points
LUP-6.1Neighborhoods as a Basic Unit
LUP-6.9Design Around Open and Green Space
LUP-6.12Reconnecting Communities
LUP-7.1Heavy Industry

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
LUP-8.1Unique Sense of Place
LUP-8.9People-Friendly Design
LUP-8.10Responsiveness to Context
LUP-11.3Local Human and Ecological Context
LUP-A.6Future High-Frequency Transit Routes
NN-LUP-4Landscape Freeway Buffers
NN-LUP-5Open Space Buffers
NN-LUP-6Easements in Buffer Areas
SA-LUP-10Industrial Relocation
SN-LUP-4Drive-through Commercial
HCR-1.10Demolition
HCR-1.19Access to Energy Retrofits
ERC-2.2Biological Resources
ERC-2.3Onsite Preservation
ERC-2.4Native and Climate-Adapted Plants
ERC-3.1Urban Forest Plan
ERC-3.2Tree Canopy Expansion
ERC-3.3Tree Protection
ERC-3.4Private Streets
ERC-3.5Tree List
ERC-3.6Urban Forest Maintenance
ERC-3.7Trees of Significance
ERC-3.8Public Education
ERC-3.9Watering and Irrigation
ERC-3.10Parking Lot Shading
ERC-3.11Planting
ERC-4.1Regional Coordination
ERC-4.2Air Quality Awareness
ERC-4.3Project Design
ERC-4.4Sensitive Uses
ERC-4.5Construction Emissions
ERC-4.7Operational Emissions
ERC-8.1Cooling Design Techniques
ERC-8.2Large Heat Islands
ERC-8.3Urban Heat Pilot Projects
ERC-8.4Municipal Cool Roof Retrofits
ERC-8.5Cool Libraries
ERC-8.6Heat-Reducing Public Amenities
ERC-8.7Extreme Heat Education
ERC-8.8Heat Waves
ERC-8.9Cooling Centers

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
ERC-9.12Regenerative Food System
ERC-10.1Exterior Noise Standards
ERC-10.2Noise Source Control
ERC-10.3Interior Noise Standards
ERC-10.4Interior Noise Review for Multiple, Loud, Short-Term Events
ERC-10.5Interior Vibration Standards
ERC-10.6Effects of Vibration
ERC-10.7Vibration
ERC-10.8Alternative Paving Materials
ERC-10.9Construction Noise Controls
ERC-10.10Airport Land Use Compatibility
ERC-10.11Hazardous Noise Protection
ERC-A.7Cooling Landscape Standards
EJ-2.1New Healthy Food Grocers
EJ-2.2Grocery Access
EJ-2.8Community and Home Gardening
EJ-2.9Urban Agriculture in New Development
EJ-2.10Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone
EJ-2.11Home-Based Food Enterprises
EJ-2.15Limit Unhealthy Food Establishments
EJ-2.16Discourage Unhealthy Uses
EJ-3.2Supplemental Funding for Sources for Building Rehabilitation
EJ-3.3Healthy Homes
EJ-3.4Healthy Environment
M-1.2User Prioritization
M-1.3Healthy Transportation System Options
M-1.11Increase Bicycling and Walking
M-1.13Walkability
M-1.14Walking Facilities
M-1.15Improve Walking Connectivity
M-1.16Barrier Removal
M-1.17Improve Bicycling Connectivity
M-1.18Bicycling Safety
M-1.19Walking Safety
M-4.1Application of Safety
M-4.2Safer Driving Speeds
M-4.3Vision Zero
M-4.4Collaborative Safety Solutions
M-4.5Safety-Related Training

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
M-4.9Safe Routes to School
NS-M-5High-Frequency Transit
YPRO-1.1Range of Experiences
YPRO-1.6Underutilized Land
YPRO-1.8Non-Conventional Park Solutions
YPRO-1.9Timing of Services
YPRO-1.10Parkland Access Standard
YPRO-1.11Enhancing Access to Parks
YPRO-1.12Parks Programming
YPRO-1.18Integrated Parks and Recreation System
YPRO-1.22Organized Sports and Recreational Facilities
YPRO-1.24Municipal Golf Courses
YPRO-3.7Inclusive and Accessible Recreational Needs
AA-YPRO-2New Park Site
CC-YPRO-1New Park Site
CC-YPRO-2Activate Existing Parks
CC-YPRO-3Sacramento River Waterfront Recreation and Access
CC-YPRO-4Park Amenities
CC-YPRO-5Organized Sports and Recreational Facilities
ES-YPRO-1Improve Park Access
ES-YPRO-4Exercise Equipment
FB-YPRO-1Granite Regional Park Expansion
FB-YPRO-2Army Depot Park
FB-YPRO-5Morrison Creek Project
LP-YPRO-4Sacramento City College Facilities
NN-YPRO-1Ninos Parkway
NN-YPRO-2Organized Sports and Recreational Facilities
NS-YPRO-1Walter S. Ueda Parkway Access
NS-YPRO-2Hagginwood Park Access
NS-YPRO-3Robla Park Clubhouse and Signage
NS-YPRO-4New Park Site
PG-YPRO-4Pool and Neighborhood Center Access
SA-YPRO-1Regional Park
SA-YPRO-4Community Center Location
SA-YPRO-5Laguna Floodplain Open Space
SA-YPRO-6Food-Anchored Resiliency Hubs
SN-YPRO-1Gardenland Park Access
SN-YPRO-2Walter S. Ueda Parkway Access
SN-YPRO-6Connections to East Levee Road Trails

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
Housing Availability, Affordability, and Preservation
(link to Housing Element)
LUP-1.4City Services Prior to Annexation
LUP-1.5Surplus Land Disposition
LUP-1.6Growth and Change Evaluation
LUP-1.7Regional Growth Strategy
LUP-1.8Jobs-Housing Balance
LUP-3.1Maximum FAR
LUP-3.2Sliding Floor Area Ratio Scale
LUP-3.3Allowed Net Building Area
LUP-3.4Exemption from Sliding Floor Area Ratio Scale for Remodels and Additions
LUP-3.5Flexibility for Multi-Parcel Development
LUP-3.6Minimum FAR
LUP-3.7Minimum Density
LUP-3.8Development Intensity at Less than the Minimum FAR
LUP-3.9Minimum Standards for Renovations and Expansions
LUP-3.10Exemptions for Historic Structure Conversions
LUP-3.11Zoning Inconsistency
LUP-4.14Elimination of Vehicle Parking Minimums
LUP-4.15Vacant Property
LUP-5.3Mixed-Use Neighborhood Centers
LUP-5.4Neighborhood Shopping Center Revitalization
LUP-6.2Range of Residential Development Intensities
LUP-6.3Variety of Housing Types
LUP-6.6New Growth Neighborhoods
LUP-7.4Live/Work Options
LUP-7.6Industrial Conversion
LUP-9.6Artist Enclaves/Live-Work Studios
LUP-A.2Local Bonus Program
LUP-A.10Planning and Development Code Update
LP-LUP-2Student Housing
SA-LUP-2102-Acre Parcel
SA-LUP-5Florin Road Reinvestment and Economic Development
SA-LUP-12Mixed-Use Corridor
SN-LUP-1Vibrant Northgate
HCR-1.19Access to Energy Retrofits
EJ-3.1Resource Optimization
EJ-3.2Supplemental Funding Sources for Building Rehabilitation
EJ-3.3Healthy Homes
EJ-3.4Healthy Environment

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
Infrastructure Maintenance
HCR-1.2Maintenance and Preservation
HCR-1.7Contextual Features
HCR-1.8Ongoing Maintenance
E-3.4Shared Infrastructure
ERC-A.6Landscape Maintenance Ordinance
M-1.39Maintain the Street System
M-5.3Bridges
M-5.4Rail Operations Impacts
M-5.9Truck Route Design
M-5.14Helicopter Use
M-5.15Drones
NS-M-6Street Improvements
PFS-3.4Water Distribution System Management
PFS-3.5Water Treatment Capacity and Infrastructure
PFS-3.6Combined Sewer System Rehabilitation and Improvements
PFS-3.8Capital Improvement Programming
PFS-3.10Meet Projected Needs
PFS-3.12Safe, Compatible Utility Design
PFS-4.1Exercise and Protect Water Rights
PFS-4.2Water Supply Sustainability
PFS-4.3Surface Water Supply
PFS-4.4Groundwater Infrastructure
PFS-4.5Comprehensive Water Supply Planning
PFS-4.6Recycled Water
PFS-4.7Water Supply During Emergencies
PFS-4.8New Development
PFS-6.3Adequate Facilities and Service
PFS-A.1Fire Department Strategic Plan
PFS-A.2Police Master Strategic Plan
PFS-A.3Sewer Long Range Plan Updates
PFS-A.4Stormwater Master Planning
PFS-A.5Onsite Non-Potable Water Reuse
PFS-A.6Water Treatment Facilities
PFS-A.7Telecommunication Infrastructure in New Development
PFS-A.8Municipal Telecommunications Team
PFS-A.9Periodic Review
FB-PFS-1Storm System Impacts
NN-PFS-2Drainage Facilities
NN-PFS-4Operational Drainage Facilities

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
NS-PFS-7Assessment Districts
SA-PFS-4Utility Undergrounding
SA-PFS-5Infrastructure Deficiencies
YPRO-1.2Youth, Parks, & Community Enrichment (YPCE) Parks Plan
YPRO-1.24Municipal Golf Courses
YPRO-1.26Maintenance of Existing Facilities
Inter-Agency Collaboration
LUP-1.7Regional Growth Strategy
LUP-1.10Adjacent Development
LUP-1.11Airport Land Use Compatibility
LUP-A.1Areas of Concern
LUP-A.6Future High-Frequency Transit Routes
HCR-2.6Coordination with Other Entities
HCR-A.2Heritage Tourism Plan
E-2.8Public Procurement
E-4.1Coordinated Economic and Community Development
ERC-1.2Clean Watershed
ERC-2.6Wetland Protection
ERC-2.7Annual Grasslands
ERC-2.9Habitat Assessments
ERC-2.10Agency Coordination
ERC-4.2Air Quality Awareness
ERC-6.2Flood Management Planning Coordination
ERC-6.8Interagency Levee Management
ERC-8.5Cool Libraries
EJ-2.2Grocery Access
EJ-3.1Resource Optimization
EJ-3.2Supplemental Funding for Sources for Building Rehabilitation
EJ-3.3Healthy Homes
EJ-A.11Healthy Food Initiatives Partnership
M-2.4Shared Shuttles
M-2.6Transit/Event Coordination
M-2.7Free or Discounted Transit Passes
M-2.9Advocacy and Events
M-5.10Aviation Facilities
M-5.11Aviation Services
M-5.12Zero-Emission Aircraft
M-5.13Efficient Ground Connections
NS-M-5High-Frequency Transit
PFS-1.1Crime and Law Enforcement

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
PFS-1.2Community-Based Policing
PFS-1.3Communication with Residents and Businesses
PFS-1.4Community Programs
PFS-2.3Evacuation Routes
PFS-3.1Provision of Adequate Facilities
NN-PFS-1Coordinate with Other Agencies
YPRO-2.3School Facilities
YPRO-2.4Library Services
YPRO-3.1Health Data and Programming
Investments in Equity
LUP-1.8Jobs-Housing Balance
LUP-4.16Compatibility Between Light Industrial and Residential Uses
LUP-5.6Local Business Preservation
LUP-6.12Reconnecting Communities
LUP-9.1Cultural and Entertainment Centers
LUP-9.7Anti-Displacement Strategies
LUP-A.2Local Bonus Program
LUP-A.6Future High-Frequency Transit Routes
HCR-1.13Indigenous Cultures
HCR-1.14Archaeological, Tribal, and Cultural Resources
E-1.6Growth in Opportunity Areas
E-2.1Investments for Inclusive, Equitable Growth
E-2.3Neighborhood Development Action Team
E-2.4Access to Labor and Jobs
E-2.5Opportunity Zones
E-2.7Small Business/Startup Support
E-4.2Inclusive Economic Development Investments
E-A.3Paid and Volunteer Job Programs
E-A.4Life-Long Learning
E-A.6Workforce Preparedness Program
ERC-2.5Environmental Awareness
ERC-5.1Active Water Conservation Program
ERC-8.6Heat-Reducing Public Amenities
EJ-1.1Air Quality Monitoring
EJ-1.2Community Air Protection
EJ-1.3Data-Informed Efforts
EJ-2.1New Healthy Food Grocers
EJ-2.2Grocery Access
EJ-2.3Open Air Food Sales
EJ-2.4Expanded Reach of Food Distribution

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
EJ-2.5Food Assistance Programs
EJ-2.10Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone
EJ-2.11Home-Based Food Enterprises
EJ-2.14Financial Incentives
EJ-2.15Limit Unhealthy Food Establishments
EJ-2.17Healthy Food Promotion
EJ-2.19Farm-to-Fork
EJ-2.20Evaluating Health Impacts
EJ-3.1Resource Optimization
EJ-3.2Supplemental Funding for Sources for Building Rehabilitation
EJ-4.4Capacity Building
EJ-4.5Increasing Participation of Underserved Communities
EJ-4.6Community Oversight
EJ-4.7Sustained Engagement
EJ-5.1Equity Education
EJ-5.2Internal Practices
EJ-5.3Cross-Functional Action Team
EJ-5.4Racial, Gender, and LGBTQ+ Equity
EJ-5.5Investment Prioritization
EJ-5.6Embedding Racial Equity
EJ-A.4Community-Led Planning
EJ-A.7Healthy Food Zoning
M-1.10Community Engagement
PFS-6.5Broadband Access
PFS-6.6Net Neutrality
YPRO-1.3Parkland Service Standard
YPRO-1.24Welcoming Amenities
YPRO-A.3Mobile Wellness Clinics
YPRO-A.7Performance-Based Prioritization
ES-YPRO-1Improve Park Access
FB-YPRO-6UC Davis Medical Center Events
Joint-Use Facilities and Co-Location
LUP-2.8Co-Location of Community Facilities
LUP-4.3Anchor Institutions
LUP-5.2Shopping Centers as Focal Points
LUP-7.4Live/Work Options
LUP-9.1Cultural and Entertainment Centers
LUP-9.3Assembly Facilities and Event Centers
LUP-7.6Industrial Conversion
PG-LUP-1Town Centers

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
E-3.4Shared Infrastructure
E-A.5Cluster Development Strategy
ERC-9.6Resiliency Hubs
M-1.32Supportive Infrastructure in the Public Right-of-Way
M-1.34Electric Mobility (E-Mobility) Hubs
M-2.11Passenger Pick-Up/Drop-Off
M-2.16Shared Parking
M-5.2Sacramento Valley Station
M-A.6Sacramento Valley Station Regional Governance Structure
PFS-1.9Co-Location of Facilities
PFS-1.10Cooperative Delivery of Services
PFS-3.11Joint-Use Facilities
PFS-6.3Co-Location
YPRO-1.7Co-Located Joint-Use Facilities
YPRO-2.2Co-Location of Community-Serving Facilities
YPRO-A.6Joint-Use Standards
Leveraging Development
LUP-A.2Local Bonus Program
NN-LUP-2Commercial Center Placemaking
SA-LUP-5Florin Road Reinvestment and Economic Development
SN-LUP-3Truxel Road Site Design
ERC-2.3Onsite Preservation
ERC-3.4Private Streets
ERC-3.11Planting
ERC-4.3Project Design
ERC-8.1Cooling Design Techniques
ERC-9.4Carbon-Neutral Buildings
ERC-A.9Minimum Tree Requirements
ERC-A.10Parking Lot Shade Ordinance
FB-ED-1Development Incentives
M-1.7Fine-Grained Network
M-1.15Improve Walking Connectivity
M-1.40Contributions from New Development
M-3.4Cul-de-Sacs
PFS-1.7Water Supply for Fire Suppression
PFS-1.8Fire Hazards
PFS-1.15Development Fees for Facilities and Services
PFS-1.16Development Review
PFS-3.6Combined Sewer System Rehabilitation and Improvements

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
PFS-3.14Underground Utilities
PFS-3.16Stormwater Design in Private Development
PFS-6.6Net Neutrality
YPRO-3.6Private Commercial Recreational Facilities
Local Business Support
LUP-1.8Jobs-Housing Balance
LUP-5.2Shopping Centers as Focal Points
LUP-5.3Mixed-Use Neighborhood Centers
LUP-5.4Neighborhood Shopping Center Revitalization
LUP-5.5Neighborhood Commerce
LUP-5.6Local Business Preservation
LUP-6.11Home-Based Businesses
LUP-7.4Live/Work Options
LUP-9.2Destination City
LUP-A.11Home Occupation Regulations
CC-LUP-1Central Business District
CC-LUP-2Local Retail
CC-LUP-3Old Sacramento Waterfront Community Uses
CC-LUP-4Old Sacramento Retail Visioning
CC-LUP-5Old Sacramento Access and Views
CC-LUP-6Old Sacramento River Views
CC-LUP-7Old Sacramento Cultural Arts District
FB-LUP-2Stockton Business Revitalization
FB-LUP-3Light Industrial on Stockton Boulevard
FB-LUP-4Army Depot Special Planning District
SA-LUP-3Neighborhood Serving Land Uses Around Commercial Corridors
SA-LUP-6South Area Food Culture
HCR-2.6Coordination with Other Entities
HCR-3.3Heritage Tourism
HCR-A.3Education and Awareness
E-1.1Strengthening Employment Clusters
E-1.2Business Attraction and Expansion
E-1.3Tradable Industries
E-1.4Suitable Buildings and Sites
E-1.6Growth in Opportunity Areas
E-1.7Destination for Businesses
E-1.8Economic Development Strategic Plan
E-1.9Nighttime Economy
E-2.1Investments for Inclusive, Equitable Growth
E-2.2Access to Capital

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
E-2.5Opportunity Zones
E-2.6Sustainable Business Programs
E-2.7Small Business/Startup Support
E-2.8Public Procurement
E-2.9Local Pilot Projects
E-3.3Small Business Lending
E-3.5Local Business Coordination
E-3.6Economic Gardening
E-4.4Local Business Needs Assessment
E-A.2Aligning Education and Training
E-A.3Paid and Volunteer Job Programs
E-A.4Life-Long Learning
E-A.5Cluster Development Strategy
E-A.6Workforce Preparedness Program
EJ-2.1New Healthy Food Grocers
EJ-2.7Partner with Farmers
EJ-2.11Home-Based Food Enterprises
EJ-2.12Regional Food Hub
EJ-2.14Financial Incentives
EJ-2.19Farm-to-Fork
EJ-A.1Retailer Incentive Program
FB-ED-2Florins-Perkins Industrial Area
FB-ED-3Local Business Sponsorship
FB-ED-4Stockton Boulevard Business Participation
M-5.6Good Movement Facilities
M-2.2Wider Participation
PFS-5.1Solid Waste Reduction
Older Adults
LUP-6.5Established Neighborhoods
LUP-6.10Care Facilities
LUP-9.5Arts Education
NN-LUP-2Commercial Center Placemaking
PG-LUP-1Town Centers
E-4.6Education and Training Systems
E-4.7Barriers to Workforce Participation
E-4.8Entrepreneurship and Social Enterprise Training
E-A.4Life-Long Learning
ERC-9.6Resiliency Hubs
EJ-2.2Grocery Access
M-1.4Designing to Move People
M-4.1Application of Safety

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
M-4.2Safer Driving Speeds
M-4.3Vision Zero
YPRO-2.7Child/Older Adult Care
YPRO-3.3Health Programming and Events
ES-YPRO-3River Amenities
ES-YPRO-4Exercise Equipment
PG-YPRO-4Pool and Neighborhood Center Access
Pollution Reduction/Prevention
LUP-4.14Elimination of Vehicle Parking Minimums
LUP-4.16Compatibility Between Light Industrial and Residential Uses
LUP-7.2Industrial Uses Along Rivers
LUP-7.3Production, Distribution, and Repair
LUP-A.6Future High-Frequency Transit Routes
HCR-1.19Access to Energy Retrofits
ERC-1.1Clean Water Programs
ERC-1.2Clean Watershed
ERC-1.3Runoff Contamination
ERC-1.4Construction Site Impacts
ERC-2.1Conservation of Water Resources in Open Space Areas
ERC-4.1Regional Coordination
ERC-4.2Air Quality Awareness
ERC-4.3Project Design
ERC-4.4Sensitive Uses
ERC-4.5Construction Emissions
ERC-4.6Gas-Powered Landscaping Equipment
ERC-4.7Operational Emissions
ERC-5.2Reducing Storm Runoff
ERC-9.1Communitywide GHG Reduction
ERC-9.2Additional GHG Emission Programs
ERC-9.12Regenerative Food System
NN-ERC-1Fisherman's Lake Buffer
NS-ERC-1McClellan Heights and Park Homes Plan Noise Area
NS-EJ-1Neighborhood Clean Up
EJ-1.1Air Quality Monitoring
EJ-1.2Community Air Protection
EJ-1.3Data-Informed Efforts
EJ-1.4Impacts Assessment
EJ-1.5Compatibility with Hazardous Materials Facilities
EJ-1.6Risks from Hazardous Materials Facilities

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
EJ-1.7Transportation Routes
EJ-1.8Site Contamination
EJ-1.9Household Hazardous Waste Collection Programs
EJ-1.10Education
EJ-A.5Amortization Ordinance
M-1.20High Frequency Transit Service
M-1.21Extension of Transit Service
M-1.22Increase Transit Ridership
M-1.23Transit Priority
M-1.24Transit-Only Lanes
M-1.25First/Last-Mile Solutions
M-1.26Bus Stop Design
M-1.27Electric Vehicle (EV) Strategy
M-1.28Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Capital
M-1.29Shared Zero-Emission Vehicles (ZEVs)
M-1.30Public Electric Vehicle (EV) Infrastructure Deployment
M-1.31Private Electric Vehicle (EV) Infrastructure Deployment
M-1.32Supportive Infrastructure in the Public Right-of-Way
M-1.33Electric Vehicle (EV) Car Share and Electric Bike Share
M-1.34Electric Mobility (E-Mobility) Hubs
M-1.35Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV) First
M-1.36Electric Vehicles in New Development
M-1.37Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging in Existing Development
M-1.38Electric Vehicles (EVs) and Energy Resiliency
M-2.3Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as Metric
M-2.4Shared Shuttles
M-2.5Onsite Childcare
M-2.6Transit/Event Coordination
M-2.14Parking Supply
M-2.15Incentives for Zero-Emission Vehicles (ZEVs)
M-2.16Shared Parking
M-2.17Parking Management Strategy
M-2.18Technology to Optimize Parking Utilization
M-2.19Optimizing Residential Utilization
M-5.7Zero-Emission Fleets
M-5.8Zero Emission Delivery
M-5.12Zero-Emission Aircraft
M-A.5Regional Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Mitigation

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
M-A.9Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Ordinance
NS-M-5High-Frequency Transit
PFS-3.3Development Impacts
PFS-3.13Impacts to Environmentally Sensitive Lands
PFS-3.15Adequate Drainage Facilities
PFS-3.16Stormwater Design in Private Development
PFS-3.17Regional Stormwater Facilities
PFS-5.1Solid Waste Reduction
PFS-5.2Collection and Recycling Services
PFS-5.3Mixed and Organic Recycling
PFS-5.4Regional Recycling Market Development Zone
PFS-5.5Recycled Materials in New Construction
PFS-5.6Bulky Item and Appliance Disposal
PFS-5.7Organic Waste Collection Services
PFS-5.8Household Hazardous Waste Disposal
PFS-5.9Targeted Technical Assistance
PFS-A.3Sewer Long Range Plan Updates
PFS-A.4Stormwater Master Planning
PFS-A.5Onsite Non-Potable Water Reuse
PFS-A.6Water Treatment Facilities
AA-PFS-1Neighborhood Clean Up
YPRO-1.19Sustainable Design
ES-YPRO-3River Amenities
SN-YPRO-6Connections to East Levee Road Trails
Public Spaces
LUP-8.12Design of Privately-Developed Public Spaces
LUP-9.8Public Art
NN-LUP-2Commercial Center Placemaking
SN-LUP-2Northgate Boulevard Placemaking
HCR-1.13Indigenous Cultures
HCR-1.16Endemic Traditions
HCR-A.3Education and Awareness
M-3.5Open Street Events
M-3.6Outdoor Dining Program
NS-M-6Street Improvements
YPRO-1.1Range of Experiences
YPRO-1.6Underutilized Land
YPRO-1.8Non-Conventional Park Solutions
YPRO-1.9Timing of Services
YPRO-1.10Parkland Access Standard

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
YPRO-1.11Enhancing Access to Parks
YPRO-1.12Parks Programming
YPRO-1.18Integrated Parks and Recreation System
YPRO-1.22Organized Sports and Recreational Facilities
YPRO-1.24Municipal Golf Courses
YPRO-3.7Inclusive and Accessible Recreational Needs
AA-YPRO-2New Park Site
CC-YPRO-1New Park Site
CC-YPRO-2Activate Existing Parks
CC-YPRO-3Sacramento River Waterfront Recreation and Access
CC-YPRO-4Park Amenities
CC-YPRO-5Organized Sports and Recreational Facilities
ES-YPRO-1Improve Park Access
ES-YPRO-4Exercise Equipment
FB-YPRO-1Granite Regional Park Expansion
FB-YPRO-2Army Depot Park
FB-YPRO-5Morrison Creek Project
LP-YPRO-4Sacramento City College Facilities
NN-YPRO-1Ninos Parkway
NS-YPRO-1Walter S. Ueda Parkway Access
NS-YPRO-2Hagginwood Park Access
NS-YPRO-3Robla Park Clubhouse and Signage
NS-YPRO-4New Park Site
PG-YPRO-4Pool and Neighborhood Center Access
SA-YPRO-1Regional Park
SA-YPRO-4Community Center Location
SA-YPRO-5Laguna Floodplain Open Space
SA-YYPRO-6Food-Anchored Resiliency Hubs
SN-YPRO-1Gardenland Park Access
SN-YPRO-2Walter S. Ueda Parkway Access
Racial Equity
LUP-1.7Regional Growth Strategy
SA-LUP-6South Area Food Culture
HCR-3.1Education and Awareness
HCR-A.9Native American Cultural Resources
E-1.6Growth in Opportunity Areas
E-2.3Neighborhood Development Action Team
E-2.5Opportunity Zones
E-2.7Small Business/Startup Support
E-2.8Public Procurement
ERC-2.5Environmental Awareness

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
EJ-5.6Embedding Racial Equity
EJ-A.3DAC Representation
EJ-A.4Community-Led Planning
EJ-A.6Performance Zoning
EJ-A.8Racial Equity Analysis
Regional Scale Planning
LUP-1.2Logical Boundaries
LUP-1.3New Growth Annexation
LUP-1.4City Services Prior to Annexation
LUP-1.5Surplus Land Disposition
LUP-1.7Regional Growth Strategy
LUP-1.9Advocacy
LUP-1.10Adjacent Development
LUP-5.1Evolving Regional Commercial Centers
LUP-A.1Areas of Concern
LUP-A.4Fruitridge-Florin Annexation
FB-LUP-5City/County Coordination
SA-LUP-7Health Care Sector Growth
SA-LUP-8Sacramento Executive Airport
SA-LUP-9Industrial Development Near 47th Street
SA-LUP-15Town of Freeport Long-Range Development
E-1.2Business Attraction and Expansion
E-1.7Destination for Businesses
E-2.2Access to Capital
ERC-1.2Clean Watershed
ERC-1.3Runoff Contamination
ERC-1.6Groundwater Management
ERC-2.1Conservation of Water Resources in Open Space Areas
ERC-2.11Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan
ERC-2.12Support Habitat Conservation Plan Efforts
ERC-4.1Regional Coordination
ERC-6.2Flood Management Planning Coordination
ERC-6.8Interagency Levee Management
EJ-2.6Food Recovery Program
EJ-2.12Regional Food Hub
M-1.20High Frequency Transit Service
M-1.21Extension of Transit Service
M-2.8Micro-Transit Service
M-5.1Regional Mobility System
M-5.2Sacramento Valley Station

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
M-5.3Bridges
M-5.4Rail Operations Impacts
M-5.5Regional Advocacy
M-5.7Zero-Emission Fleets
M-A.5Regional Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Mitigation
M-A.6Sacramento Valley Station Regional Governance Structure
M-A.7Roadway Reallocations
PFS-3.9Methane Recovery
PFS-3.17Regional Stormwater Facilities
SN-YPRO-5American River Maintenance
River Access and Views
LUP-8.2River as Signature Feature
LUP-8.3River Access and Ecology
LUP-8.15Setbacks from Rivers and Creeks
CC-LUP-5Old Sacramento Access and Views
CC-LUP-6Old Sacramento River Views
CC-LUP-7Old Sacramento Cultural Arts District
SN-LUP-5Riverfront Landscaping
ERC-6.3Floodway Capacity
SN-M-4American River Parkway Connections
YPRO-1.16River Parkways
YPRO-1.17Waterway Recreation and Access
YPRO-1.18Miller Regional Park/Sacramento Marina
CC-YPRO-3Sacramento River Waterfront Recreation and Access
ES-YPRO-3River Amenities
PG-YPRO-1River Parkway
PG-YPRO-2Parkways/Greenways
SN-YPRO-4River Access Points
Roadway Safety
LUP-6.8Gated Communities
M-4.1Application of Safety
M-4.2Safer Driving Speeds
M-4.3Vision Zero
M-4.4Collaborative Safety Solutions
M-4.5Safety-Related Training
M-4.6Rail Crossings
M-4.7Integrated Goods Movement
M-4.8Detour Facilities
M-4.9Safe Routes to School
M-A.3High Injury Network

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
M-A.4Curb Space Management Plan
M-A.10Street Design Standards Update
CC-M-1Roadway Reallocations
CC-M-3Curbside Management
CC-M-4Traffic Calming
FB-M-1Roadway Reallocations
NS-M-1Roadway Reallocations
NS-M-4Traffic Calming
SA-PFS-1Effective Infrastructure at TODs
Streamlined City Processes
LUP-1.14Deed Notice
LUP-3.9Minimum Standards for Renovations and Expansions
LUP-3.10Exemptions for Historic Structure Conversions
LUP-3.11Zoning Inconsistency
LUP-4.2Incentivizing Infill
LUP-A.5Special Studies
NN-LUP-4Employment Center Development Guidelines
HCR-1.18Evaluation of Potentially Eligible Built Environment Resources
HCR-2.1Administration of Functions and Programs
HCR-2.2Certified Local Government
HCR-2.3Sacramento Register
HCR-2.5Code Compliance
HCR-A.7Guidance Documents
E-3.1State-of-the-Art Business and Industrial Areas
E-3.2Innovation and Growth
E-A.9Competitiveness Assessment
EJ-A.9Community Input Database
PFS-1.14Timing of Services
Streetscapes
LUP-2.5Design for Connectivity
LUP-4.6Compatibility with Adjoining Uses
LUP-4.7Visual and Physical Character
LUP-4.8Buildings that Engage the Street
LUP-4.9Enhanced Pedestrian Environment
LUP-4.10Multi-Modal Access
LUP-4.11Shared Parking, Driveways, and Alley Access
LUP-6.5Established Neighborhoods
LUP-8.4Enhanced City Gateways
LUP-8.5Development Adjacent to Freeways and Railroad Corridors

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
LUP-8.6Prominent Corner Architecture
LUP-8.8Iconic Sense of Place
LUP-8.9People-Friendly Design
LUP-8.13Continuity of Streetscape Design
LUP-8.14Streetscape Beautification
NS-LUP-1Del Paso Boulevard Activation and Placemaking Improvements
NS-LUP-2Del Paso Creative Activation
SA-LUP-4Corridor Revitalization
SN-LUP-3Truxel Road Site Design
HCR-1.7Contextual Features
HCR-1.3Compatibility with Historic Context
ERC-2.4Native and Climate-Adapted Plants
ERC-3.11Planting
ERC-A.4Heat Reduction in the Public Realm
ERC-A.5Bus Shelter Design
ERC-A.7Cooling Landscape Standards
ERC-A.9Minimum Tree Requirements
ERC-A.11Street Standards for Tree Canopy
M-1.5Street Design Standards
M-1.6Transit Integration
M-2.10Curbside Management
M-2.11Passenger Pick-Up/Drop-Off
M-2.12Innovative Mobility Solutions and Curb of the Future
M-2.13Curb and Mobility Use Data
M-3.1Local Streets
M-3.2Street Design
M-3.3Traffic
M-3.4Cul-de-Sacs
M-3.5Open Street Events
M-3.6Outdoor Dining Program
M-4.1Application of Safety
M-A.10Street Design Standards Update
CC-M.4Traffic Calming
NS-M-1Street Extensions
NS-M-6Street Improvements
PFS-1.5CPTED Strategies
YPRO-1.13Park Safety
Technology
LUP-2.7Evolving Office Needs
E-3.1State-of-the-Art Business and Industrial Areas

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
E-3.7Investments in Technology
E-A.10Municipal Open Data
ERC-1.5Drinking Water Data
ERC-4.2Air Quality Awareness
ERC-9.3Lead by Example in Design of Buildings
EJ-2.20Evaluating Health Impacts
EJ-A.9Community Input Database
M-2.1Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
M-2.13Curb and Mobility Use Data
M-2.18Technology to Optimize Parking Utilization
M-6.1Pioneer New Mobility Techniques
M-6.2Mobility Partnerships
M-6.3Mobility Data Access
M-6.4System Management
M-6.5Data-Driven Prioritization
M-6.6Innovation for System Performance
M-6.7Data to Spur Innovation
M-6.8Data from Private Operators
PFS-1.13Technology to Improve Public Safety
PFS-6.1Access and Availability
PFS-6.2Public/Private Collaboration
PFS-6.3Adequate Facilities and Service
PFS-6.4Co-Location
PFS-6.5Broadband Access
PFS-6.6Net Neutrality
PFS-6.7City Operations/Public Services
PFS-6.8Telecommunication Infrastructure Improvements
PFS-A.7Telecommunication Infrastructure in New Development
PFS-A.8Municipal Telecommunications Team
PFS-A.9Periodic Review
YPRO-2.5Digital Literacy and Access
YPRO-3.1Health Data and Programming
Transit-Supportive Development
LUP-1.1Compact Urban Footprint
LUP-2.1Overall Balance of Uses
LUP-2.2Interconnected City
LUP-2.3Diverse Centers and Corridors
LUP-2.4Development Intensity Linked to Transit
LUP-2.5Design for Connectivity
LUP-2.6Employment Clusters
LUP-4.1Transit-Supported Development
LUP-4.2Incentivizing Infill
LUP-4.4Public Uses and Services
LUP-4.5Efficient Parel Utilization
LUP-4.12Drive-Through Restaurants
LUP-4.14Elimination of Vehicle Parking Minimums
LUP-5.1Evolving Regional Commercial Centers
FB-LUP-1Transit-Supportive Uses
LP-LUP-1Transit Oriented Development
NN-LUP-1Mixed-Use Nodes
NN-LUP-2Commercial Center Placemaking
PG-LUP-1Town Centers
SA-LUP-1Development Around South Line Light Rail Stations
SA-LUP-14Meadowview Light Rail Station
SN-LUP-3Truxel Road Site Design
E-2.4Access to Labor and Jobs
ERC-8.6Heat-Reducing Public Amenities
ERC-A.4Heat Reduction in the Public Realm
EJ-2.1New Healthy Food Grocers
EJ-2.2Grocery Access
M-1.6Transit Integration
M-1.12Light Rail Transit (LRT) Station Access Improvements
M-1.20High-Frequency Transit Service
M-1.21Extension of Transit Service
M-1.22Increase Transit Ridership
M-1.23Transit Priority
M-1.24Transit-Only Lanes
M-1.25First/Last-Mile Solutions
M-1.26Bus Stop Design
M-2.1Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
M-2.2Wider Participation
M-2.4Shared Shuttles
M-2.5Onsite Childcare
M-2.6Transit/Event Coordination
M-2.7Free or Discounted Transit Passes
M-2.8Micro-Transit Service
M-2.9Advocacy and Events
ES-M-2Sacramento State Transport
FB-M-1SmaRT Rides
NN-M-1Light Rail Corridor
NN-M-2Light Rail Right-of-Way
NN-M-3High-Frequency Transit

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
NN-M-4Transit Center
NN-M-5Light Rail Stations
SN-M-1Improved Transit
SN-M-2Transit Right-of-Way
ES-TV-1Transit Supportive Uses
YPRO-2.3School Facilities
YPRO-A.1Youth, Parks, & Community Enrichment (YPCE) Parks Plan Update
Urban Forest
LUP-4.1Transit-Supportive Development
LUP-5.2Shopping Centers as Focal Points
LUP-6.5Established Neighborhoods
LUP-8.1Unique Sense of Place
LUP-8.5Development Adjacent to Freeways and Railroad Corridors
LUP-8.9People-Friendly Design
LUP-8.12Design of Privately-Developed Public Spaces
LUP-8.14Streetscape Beautification
LUP-A.10Planning and Development Code Update
ERC-2.3Onsite Preservation
ERC-2.4Native and Climate-Adapted Plants
ERC-3.1Urban Forest Plan
ERC-3.2Tree Canopy Expansion
ERC-3.3Tree Protection
ERC-3.4Private Streets
ERC-3.5Tree List
ERC-3.6Urban Forest Maintenance
ERC-3.7Trees of Significance
ERC-3.8Public Education
ERC-3.9Watering and Irrigation
ERC-3.10Parking Lot Shading
ERC-3.11Planting
ERC-A.1Urban Forest Plan
ERC-A.2Tree Education
ERC-A.4Heat Reduction in the Public Realm
ERC-A.5Bus Shelter Design
ERC-A.7Cooling Landscape Standards
ERC-A.9Minimum Tree Requirements
ERC-A.10Parking Lot Shading Ordinance
FB-ERC-1Tree Planting and Maintenance
EJ-1.3Data-Informed Efforts

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
EJ-3.4Healthy Environment
AA-EJ-1Tree Planting in Parking Lots
NS-EJ-2Tree Planting
M-1.32Supportive Infrastructure in the Public Right-of-Way
M-3.1Local Streets
M-3.2Street Design
NS-M-1Street Extensions
YPRO-1.20Climate Resilient Design
Walkability
LUP-1.1Compact Urban Footprint
LUP-4.9Enhanced Pedestrian Environment
LUP-4.14Elimination of Vehicle Parking Minimums
LUP-5.1Evolving Regional Commercial Centers
LUP-5.2Shopping Centers as Focal Points
LUP-5.3Mixed-Use Neighborhood Centers
LUP-6.12Reconnecting Communities
LUP-8.1Unique Sense of Place
LUP-8.9People-Friendly Design
LUP-8.12Design of Privately-Developed Public Spaces
CC-LUP-8Temporary Alley Closures
SN-LUP-2Northgate Boulevard Placemaking
HCR-1.7Contextual Features
ERC-3.11Planting
ERC-A.4Heat Reduction in the Public Realm
M-1.4Designing to Move People
M-1.5Street Design Standards
M-1.7Fine-Grained Network
M-1.8Vacation of Public Right-of-Way
M-1.13Walkability
M-1.14Walking Facilities
M-1.15Improve Walking Connectivity
M-1.16Barrier Removal
M-1.19Walking Safety
M-3.1Local Streets
M-3.2Street Design
M-3.3Traffic
M-3.4Cul-de-Sacs
M-3.5Open Street Events
M-3.6Outdoor Dining Program
M-A.7Roadway Reallocations
ES-M-1Sacramento State Pedestrian Connections

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
FB-M-3Pedestrian Environment
NS-M-3Walking Improvements and Connections
NS-M-6Street Improvements
SN-M-3American River Parkway Connections
YPRO-1.1Range of Experiences
YPRO-2.3School Facilities
YPRO-A.1Youth, Parks, & Community Enrichment (YPCE) Parks Plan Update
FB-YPRO-3Granite Regional Park Pedestrian Access
FB-YPRO-4George Sim Park Access
LP-YPRO-3City Cemetery Pedestrian Access
SA-YPRO-2Franklin Boyce Park Access
SA-YPRO-3Joint Use Agreements
SN-YPRO-1Gardenland Park Access
SN-YPRO-2Walter S. Ueda Parkway Access
SN-YPRO-3Garden Highway Crossings
SN-YPRO-6Connections to East Levee Road Trails
Water Conservation
LUP-11.2Balanced Local Water Cycle
ERC-1.1Clean Water Programs
ERC-1.2Clean Watershed
ERC-1.3Runoff Contamination
ERC-1.4Construction Site Impacts
ERC-1.5Drinking Water Data
ERC-1.6Groundwater Management
ERC-2.1Conservation of Water Resources Open Space Areas
ERC-2.2Biological Resources
ERC-2.5Environmental Awareness
ERC-3.9Watering and Irrigation
ERC-5.1Active Water Conservation Program
ERC-5.3Water Efficiency Training
ERC-5.4Municipal Energy and Water Efficiency
ERC-5.5Publicize Voluntary Programs
ERC-5.7Onsite Water Reuse
PFS-4.1Exercise and Protect Water Rights
PFS-4.2Water Supply Sustainability
PFS-4.3Surface Water Supply
PFS-4.4Groundwater Infrastructure
PFS-4.5Comprehensive Water Supply Planning
PFS-4.6Recycled Water

Table 1-2: Policy Index

NUMBERDESCRIPTION
PFS-4.7Water Supply During Emergencies
PFS-4.8New Development
PFS-A.4Stormwater Master Planning
PFS-A.5Onsite Non-Potable Water Reuse
Youth
LUP-9.5Arts Education
E-4.3Educational Attainment
E-A.3Paid and Volunteer Job Programs
E-A.6Workforce Preparedness Program
SN-ED-1Youth Workforce Development
ERC-2.5Environmental Awareness
EJ-2.18Youth Food Literacy
EJ-A.3DAC Representation
M-2.7Free or Discounted Transit Passes
YPRO-2.3School Facilities
YPRO-2.4Library Services
YPRO-2.7Child/Older Adult Care
YPRO-3.5Youth Participation
YPRO-A.1Youth, Parks, & Community Enrichment (YPCE) Parks Plan Update
YPRO-A.2Park Audits
YPRO-A.4Youth Internships
YPRO-A.5Violence Prevention and Youth Development
LP-YPRO-5Pool Access
PG-YPRO-4Pool and Neighborhood Center Access
SA-YPRO-6Food-Anchored Resiliency Hubs

This page left intentionally blank

OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC PLANNING RECORDopenpublica.com