The Public Meeting Index

The Duluth City Council convened on September 24, 2026, at 5:16 PM, to address a range of items including liquor licensing, personnel appointments, economic development funding, parks grants, tax levies, a code of conduct amendment, a franchise fee ordinance with Minnesota Power, and zoning updates for lodging. The meeting featured extensive debate on the Minnesota Power franchise fee structure and its implications. Consent Calendar - Liquor License (Resolution 834): Approved without discussion. - Personnel Appointments (Resolutions 792, 843, 845, 846): Approved as part of the consent calendar, with the exception of Resolution 842 (Andrew R. Straits reappointment) which was pulled due to a conflict of interest concern raised by Councillor Desitel. Discussion Items - Personnel Appointment Conflict (Item 4): Councillor Desitel requested removal of Resolution 842 from the consent calendar because it involves her spouse. The council agreed to pull it for separate consideration. Councillor Klana noted that he did not believe a legal conflict existed, and the city attorney agreed to review the matter before the next meeting. - Faith Haven Apartments Rehabilitation (Resolution 841): Councillor Johnson asked for clarification. Staff confirmed that the $228,000 conditional pre-commitment of state housing funds serves as matching funding necessary for One Roof Community Housing to secure state rehabilitation funds. - Ingrid Tower Condition Assessment (Resolution 828): Councillor Klana inquired about future funding sources. Staff explained that the $20,000 Minnesota Historical Society grant is part of a strategy to position the city for larger implementation grants from the same source. - St. Louis River Public Access (Resolutions 826 & 827): Councillor Timonic requested background. Staff explained that the resolutions relate to a grant for improving public access along the St. Louis River estuary, with the St. Louis River Alliance acting as a sub-recipient. - Tax Levy Proposals (Resolutions 800-802, 812): No questions were raised; the levies for general purposes, parks, HRA, and DTA were presented. - Code of Conduct Amendment (Resolution 810): Amending standing rules to include a code of conduct; no questions. - Minnesota Power Franchise Fee (Ordinance 42): Councillor Desitel led a lengthy discussion, questioning why the Energy Planning Commission was not consulted and suggesting a higher residential rate (3.5%) to generate more funds for sustainability. Councillor Klana supported a residential increase, calling the fee a less regressive tax than property tax. Councillor Johnson asked about the impact on multifamily property managers. Director Salinas explained that the fee structure keeps residential at 3%, raises commercial to 4.25%, and large users to 4.75%, increasing projected revenue from $420,000 to $500,000. Staff stated no law requires Minnesota Power to pass fees to customers. Revenue will go to the general fund, with $250,000 allocated for sustainability projects. Councillor Desitel requested that future packets include clearer explanations of fund usage. - Lodging Code Amendments (Ordinance 40): City Manager Hobbes provided an overview, clarifying that the ordinance simplifies licensing by moving short-term rental regulation to the fire department (life safety) and correcting past errors. President Nephew emphasized this is a simplification, not a tightening. Key Outcomes - Approved: Resolution 834 (liquor license), Resolutions 792, 843, 845, 846 (personnel appointments), Resolutions 825, 835, 840, 841 (planning & economic development), Resolutions 826, 827, 828 (parks), Resolutions 800-802, 812 (tax levies), and Resolution 810 (code of conduct). - Pulled from Consent: Resolution 842 (Andrew R. Straits reappointment) will be considered separately after a conflict-of-interest review. - Introduced (First Reading): Ordinance 41 (grant anticipation notes for water utility improvement not to exceed $61,630), Ordinance 42 (Minnesota Power franchise fee), Ordinance 24 (various city code revisions), and Ordinance 40 (lodging code amendments). No final votes were taken on these ordinances during this meeting.

The Clayton County Board of Commissioners held a special called meeting on September 24, 2026, at 6:00 PM to hold the third and final public hearing on the proposed millage rate increase for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 and to vote on Resolution 2026-213 establishing the net mill rates. The meeting began with adoption of the agenda and approval of a consent agenda item (Resolution 2026-212) regarding advance voting locations for upcoming elections. CFO Terry Jackson presented the millage rate proposal, followed by public testimony from seven residents. After the public hearing, the board passed Resolution 2026-213, though one commissioner expressed dissent. Consent Calendar - Resolution 2026-212: Authorized use of various facilities for advance voting for the General Election, runoffs, emergency polling locations, and post-election risk-limiting audit. Adopted unanimously by consent. Public Comments & Testimony - Dr. Henry Anderson (District 3): Expressed strong support for the millage rate increase, arguing that the increase for a $250,000 home ($76.86/year, $6.41/month) is nominal and can be covered by discretionary spending. He praised county services and noted the funds would support salary increases for public safety and county operations. - Kate Parker (Forest Park): Opposed any millage increase, stating that her additional $10/month is equivalent to the cost of her albuterol inhaler. She urged the board to cut their own expenses (e.g., Christmas parties, catered Thanksgiving) instead of raising taxes. - Mickey Garbert (District 1, unincorporated Rex): Supported the millage increase as necessary to retain county employees and improve services, but requested a tax break for legacy citizens and seniors on fixed incomes. He noted that higher pay could reduce attrition and training costs. - Shirley Carter: Did not directly address the millage rate; instead asked about the property tax appeal process and was referred to the Tax Commissioner. - Francisco Martinez (District 4): Opposed the increase, stating his property taxes had risen from $2,000 to $8,000 over 20 years. He demanded improved services (clean pools, toilet paper, customer service rating system) and argued that tax increases are unsustainable. He criticized the appeals process as unresponsive. - Orlando Gooden (District 3): Supported the millage increase for public safety but called the budget process a "scam," citing frequent budget amendments after adoption. He urged the board to prioritize the public defender's office and solicitor general and to present accurate budgets upfront. Discussion Items - Millage Rate Presentation (CFO Terry Jackson): Jackson presented the final public hearing for the 2026 millage rates. Key figures: - Maintenance & Operations (M&O) rollback rate: 14.141 mills; proposed rate: 15.052 mills (6.44% increase). - Fire Services rollback rate: 4.068 mills; proposed rate: 4.50 mills (10.62% increase). - Example for a homestead property valued at $250,000: M&O taxes increase from $1,682.82 to $1,759.68 (difference $76.86/year, $6.41/month). - Example for a non-homestead property valued at $425,000: increase from $3,178.66 to $3,323.84 ($145.18/year, $12.10/month). - Jackson explained that the FY2027 adopted budget amendment (approved June 17, 2026) required $7.8 million additional funding for salaries (10% COLA for sworn personnel, 2% COLA for all employees, six paramedic sergeants, six firefighter EMTs), election costs, and court costs. He stated the millage increase was necessary to balance the adopted budget. - Adoption of Agenda and Consent Agenda: Routine procedural items approved unanimously. - Resolution 2026-213: The resolution to establish the mill rates after rollback for FY2026-2027, levy property taxes, provide for the mill rate credit from Local Option Sales Tax, and authorize the chairwoman to execute certifications. Key Outcomes - Resolution 2026-213 was approved by a majority vote (voice vote; ayes carried). After the vote, one commissioner (presumed chairwoman) stated for the record: "I do not agree with this tax increase... Things are too high. People are for our seniors... this is an abomination to the people of Clayton County, and we should not be having a tax increase." This indicates dissent despite the approval. - No executive session was needed. The meeting adjourned after the vote.

The Greenville Board of Adjustment held a public hearing on September 24, 2026, at 6:00 PM in City Hall Council Chambers to consider a request for a special use permit from Sarah Grimes (though the applicant identified herself as Sarah Bryans during the hearing) to operate a child daycare facility at 3004 S. Memorial Drive (tax parcel 00840). The board unanimously approved the permit subject to staff recommended conditions. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The board approved the minutes from the June 25, 2026 meeting by a voice vote with all members in favor. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public spoke in opposition to the application. The public hearing was opened and closed without any public comment. Discussion Items - Special Use Permit for Child Daycare Facility (Sarah Grimes): - Staff presented the request. The property is zoned heavy commercial and the future land use designation is commercial, consistent with the comprehensive plan. Notice of the hearing was posted on September 9, 2026, and published in the Daily Reflector on September 12, 2026. - The applicant, Sarah Grimes (who stated her name as Sarah Bryans), testified that she has operated a licensed child care center since 2012, expanding in 2017 and 2022. She currently serves 40 children on a full-day basis and seeks to expand with this new facility. - Staff outlined the special use criteria: daycare is defined as care for six or more children for up to 18 hours per day; outdoor play area of 100 sq ft per child enclosed by a fence at least 4 feet high; minimum lot size increased by 100 sq ft per child over five; playground equipment must be in rear yard; and compliance with state licensing and building codes. - Staff recommended that the request can meet all development standards required for issuance of the permit upon proper findings by the board. - The board had no questions or discussion beyond the staff presentation and applicant testimony. Key Outcomes - Motion and Vote: Board member McNair moved to approve the finding of facts and the petition with staff recommended conditions. The motion was seconded and passed unanimously by voice vote (all ayes). - Effective Date: The special use permit takes effect upon the Chair's signature, which was anticipated to be that evening. - Next Steps: The applicant must comply with all city code requirements, state licensing (NC DHHS), and building/fire codes before operation begins. Note: There is a discrepancy between the agenda (which lists the applicant as Sarah Grimes) and the transcript (where the applicant introduces herself as Sarah Bryans). The board did not address this discrepancy, and the motion referred to the petition as filed.

The Green Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) met on September 24, 2026, at 6:00 PM in the Council Chambers. The meeting covered updates on the Southgate Farm Strategic Plan, annual maintenance review, a federal Section 106 policy change, the Lichtenwalter School accessibility project, and the Public Art Plan. Two student representatives were welcomed. The minutes from March 26, 2026, were unanimously approved. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes, March 26, 2026: Moved and seconded, approved unanimously by voice vote. Discussion Items - Southgate Farm Strategic Plan RFP Update: Sarah Haring reported that a Request for Proposals (RFP) was issued, receiving 19 responses. A scoring team including HPC representative Chaz, Parks Board, Living Green Task Force, and administration members is evaluating submissions. Top three will be interviewed, with a consultant selected by end of October. City council will approve the contract by year-end. The strategic plan aims to organize city responsibilities for the farm, not farming operations themselves, with work expected to begin in 2027. - Southgate Farm Annual Maintenance Review: Haring presented a maintenance list from the annual walkthrough. Most items are interior or electrical (e.g., kitchen remodel completed, driveways poured, equipment shed doors replaced). The only exterior concern noted was summer kitchen doors not latching. A notable story: Dr. Crager, an artist who painted the barn from a website photo, visited the site for the first time and will write an article for an Ohio agricultural publication. - Section 106 Review Update: Haring explained proposed federal changes to Section 106 that would make consultation with state and local groups optional, with a shortened 45-day comment period. The HPC discussed the urgency and agreed to draft a resolution to oppose the changes. A motion was not required; Haring was asked to prepare a resolution for potential electronic vote before the next meeting. Commissioners also encouraged individual calls to senators. - Lichtenwalter School Accessibility Project Update: A new safer walkway connecting the main floor to the basement has been designed. Funding includes $75,000 in state capital funds (Casey Weinstein's office), $20,000 from Ohio & Erie Canalway, with a decision on Summit County CDBG funds pending. Total project cost is approximately $115,000. Construction is scheduled for 2027. - Public Art Plan Draft: The draft Public Art Plan (118 pages) was shared with HPC as the first public body to see it. Inspiration pages were provided; final version 3 is in progress. An open house is scheduled for October 6, 2026, from 3-6 PM at Community Hall. Themes of historic preservation and history are prominent in the plan. - CLG Report: The biannual Certified Local Government (CLG) report was completed and submitted electronically. A new question about meeting frequency was noted. The HPC meets four times per year as required. - Merger Commission Records: An intern digitized paper records from the 1992 merger commission, completing a preservation project. Key Outcomes - Minutes Approved: Unanimous approval of the March 26, 2026, meeting minutes. - Section 106 Resolution: The commission directed Sarah Haring to draft a resolution opposing the proposed federal changes to Section 106 for review, with a possible electronic vote before the next meeting. - Strategic Plan Consultant Selection: Process on track with contract award expected by year-end. - Lichtenwalter Project Funding: Additional funding decision pending for CDBG; project fully funded if awarded.

The Ocean City Board of Zoning Appeals met on Thursday, September 24, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. in City Hall Council Chambers. The board approved administrative items and three public hearing requests: a special parking exception for Bull on the Beach, a special yard exception for a sunroom, and after-the-fact variances for a dwelling in Montego Bay. All decisions were accompanied by votes and discussion. Consent Calendar - Minutes from September 10, 2026: Approved 5-0 after a correction (page 2 wording changed from "the board found that the criteria for a special parking exception had not been met" to "the board found that the zoning administrator had made the correct determination"). - Findings of Fact for BZA 2748 (Hugh Cropper, Esq. for Stephanie and Luis deCelis Trust): Approved 5-0. - 2027 Board of Zoning Appeals Meeting Dates: Approved 5-0 as provided in the September 24, 2026 staff report. Public Comments & Testimony - Maria De Guardo (9301 Atlantic Avenue, president of The Phoenix association) spoke during the Bull on the Beach hearing. She expressed concerns about traffic flow and pedestrian safety at the 94th Street and Coastal Highway corner, noting frequent double-parking and limited visibility. She stated that residents support Bull on the Beach but wanted assurance that the proposed pergola would not encroach further onto the sidewalk. The applicant responded that existing trees and vegetation would be removed and landscaping refreshed to improve sightlines. Discussion Items 1. BZA 2752 – Special Parking Exception for Bull on the Beach (GGI Builds, Inc., c/o Rich Hertzog) - Request: Waive five off-street parking spaces to allow an existing 414 sq. ft. outdoor seating area to be served by a proposed enclosed pergola with mechanical louvers and drop-down screens. - Staff Presentation: Chase Phillips explained that the pergola would convert unenclosed outdoor dining to enclosed space, triggering a parking requirement of 1 space per 100 sq. ft. (5 spaces total). The restaurant currently provides 34 spaces, far below the 61 required by code for its 6,100 sq. ft. enclosed area, making it legally nonconforming. The drop-down screens would constitute an enclosure per code, and no off-site dedicated parking within 600 feet is available. A written shared-parking agreement with Leighton's (14 spaces) exists but is not counted. Staff noted that the pergola without screens would not require board approval. - Applicant Testimony: Rich Hertzog and Michelle Knopp (owner/operators of Bull on the Beach for 35+ years) described hardship from inclement weather forcing diners inside, losing seating for 36. They emphasized no increase in seating capacity and reliance on rideshare, buses, biking, and walking. The pergola would modernize the building and provide weather protection. They argued the parking waiver is justified because the same number of patrons would be served, and parking is already a citywide issue. - Board Discussion: Board members debated whether the screens constitute an enclosure (code requires 51% open sides). Staff confirmed the determination of enclosure was not being appealed; only the parking waiver was under consideration. Some members noted that the existing nonconforming parking status and the lack of additional seats suggest the full provision of parking is unnecessary. Others questioned the evidence supporting that conclusion. A motion to approve was made by Sean Buckley, seconded by Malcolm Van Kirk. - Key Outcomes: Motion passed 4-1 (Chairman Christopher Rudolf opposed). The board found that the character or use of the building (a restaurant with no change in occupancy) made full parking provision unnecessary. 2. BZA 2751 – Special Yard Exception for Sunroom at 9203 West Biscayne Drive (Alessandro Tacconelli) - Request: Allow an enclosed sunroom to be 7 feet from the rear property line instead of the required 15 feet. - Staff Presentation: Chase Phillips noted the property is in the R-1 Single Family Residential district. Code Section 110-94(3)(b) permits a rear yard exception on a block with other nonconforming rear yards. The property at 9300 Mediterranean Drive (Lot 22, Block J) has a legally nonconforming rear yard sunroom at 7 feet, approved as a variance in 2001 (BZA 1768). Staff exhibit 5 showed the block and confirmed the nonconformity exists. - Applicant Testimony: Gail Tacconelli stated the sunroom is for additional living space for visiting grandchildren, not a bedroom or rental unit. The setback reduction would allow sufficient space while maintaining practical use of the property. She confirmed the property has never been rented. - Board Discussion: Mr. Moran noted the prior approval included a condition that the sunroom not be used for sleeping. Ms. Nock clarified that if it were a sleeping room, parking would be required. The board found no adverse impact and that the criteria for a special exception were met. - Key Outcomes: Motion to approve by John Moran, seconded by Emily Nock. Passed 5-0. 3. BZA 2749 – After-the-Fact Variances for 179 Beachcomber Lane (Hugh Cropper IV, Esq. for Sean and Patricia Chenworth) - Request: Two after-the-fact variances: (1) 0.4 feet from the 5-foot side yard setback for the existing dwelling (now 4.6 feet from side lot line), and (2) 0.1 feet from the 5-foot side yard setback for the existing dwelling (now 4.9 feet from side lot line). A third variance (0.6 feet for a covered porch) was withdrawn by the applicant. Originally, the same application (with slightly different measurements and a parking exception) was denied on April 23, 2026. The four-month waiting period was satisfied. - Background: The home was built under permit 25-0078 (issued April 3, 2025) but failed a zoning setback inspection in March 2026. An as-built survey revealed encroachments. The applicant corrected the parking depth and is addressing HVAC noncompliance separately. The dispute centers on property line location: three surveys disagree due to ambiguous monumentation in the 1971 Montego Bay subdivision. - Applicant Testimony: Hugh Cropper presented expert witness Frank Lynch, a licensed surveyor with 55 years of experience who worked on Montego Bay in 1970. Lynch testified that the lot is a parallelogram or pinch-triangle because two original markers in the front (6 inches apart) and a shifted rear marker cause a 3-inch skew. He stated that original surveyor Greg Wilkins admitted to missing the rear marker by 3 inches and that the lot is unique compared to others in the row (6 lots one way, 7 the other) where 40x90 rectangles accommodate 25-foot-wide houses. Lynch opined that the lot's irregular shape makes it impossible to fit a 25-foot house square with the road and creates a practical difficulty. Property owner Sean Chenworth testified he relied on surveyors and masons and had no intent to build in the setback. Moving the house would risk damage to neighboring properties and cost at least $20,000 in survey and remediation efforts alone. - Board Discussion: Debate centered on uniqueness. Mr. Moran argued there was insufficient evidence about adjacent lots (1134 and 1136), and logically if this lot is a parallelogram, adjacent lots must be affected too. Mr. Buckley and Ms. Nock accepted Lynch's general testimony based on his experience that this lot is unique. Mr. Van Kirk agreed, citing the impossibility of building a 25-foot house without variance. The board also considered practical difficulty: the house is built, and moving it would be disruptive and costly. - Key Outcomes: Motion to approve by Emily Nock, seconded by Malcolm Van Kirk. Passed 4-1 (John Moran opposed). The board found the lot unique due to skewed lines and that practical difficulty resulted from errors not attributable to the applicant. Key Outcomes - BZA 2752 (Bull on the Beach): Approved 4-1. Five parking spaces waived for enclosed pergola. - BZA 2751 (Tacconelli): Approved 5-0. Rear yard setback exception granted for sunroom. - BZA 2749 (Chenworth): Approved 4-1. Two after-the-fact side yard variances granted (0.4 ft and 0.1 ft). - Administrative Items: Minutes, Findings of Fact for BZA 2748, and 2027 meeting dates all approved unanimously. - Nonconformity Report: Zoning Administrator Kirsten Primm provided updates on two determinations (Kokomo Hotel, June 25, 2026; Ocean Gem Apartments, August 6, 2026). No action required. - Adjournment: Motion by John Moran, seconded by Sean Buckley, passed unanimously at approximately 8:30 p.m.

The Louisville Metro Council met at 6:01 p.m. on Thursday, September 24, 2026, in Council Chambers and via video teleconference, with Council President Brent Ackerson (D-26) presiding until yielding the chair to President Pro-Tem Tammy Hawkins (D-1) at 6:45 p.m. Per the roll call, 24 members were present; Paula McCraney (I-7) and Ben Reno-Weber (D-8) were excused. The Council approved a 24-item consent calendar, acted on 10 Old Business items (including five appropriations ordinances amended from the floor), gave first reading to 11 New Business items, and adjourned at 7:26 p.m. Special Recognitions - Council Member Anthony Piagentini (R-19) recognized Jamie MoCrazy of the MoCrazy Strong Brain Injury Foundation and her partnership with Danny Wimmer Presents to improve access to the Louder Than Life and Bourbon and Beyond music festivals for people diagnosed with brain injuries. MoCrazy, a former professional skier and the first woman to land a double backflip at the X Games, described surviving a severe traumatic brain injury and creating the foundation (a 501(c)(3) since 2023) to host "Live to Thrive" events. The Council awarded her a commendation for outstanding community service. Consent Calendar Approved by a 21-0 roll-call vote (McCraney and Reno-Weber excused; Lyninger, Owen, and Ackerson absent). All items passed as listed: - O-249-26 — $10,000 from District 26 Neighborhood Development Funds (NDF) to the Office of Arts and Creative Industries for a public mural project (Ordinance 174-2026). - O-262-26 — $14,668.54 ($7,334.27 each from Districts 2 and 5) to the Office of Social Services for an LG&E credit on behalf of Elderserve, Inc. (Ordinance 175-2026). - O-245-26 — $75,761.68 transfer between District 18 capital projects (Ordinance 176-2026). - O-246-26 — $39,274.59 transfer between various District 10 capital projects (Ordinance 177-2026). - O-250-26 — $50,000 transfer from the District 1 Capital Infrastructure Fund to the District 1 NDF (Ordinance 178-2026). - O-259-26 — $21,100 transfer from the District 14 NDF to the District 14 Capital Infrastructure Fund (Ordinance 179-2026). - O-260-26 — FY 2026-2027 operating budget language pertaining to School Bus Stop Lighting Study assistance funding (Ordinance 180-2026). - O-261-26 — Reallocating West End Improvement Fund capital project funding from the Center for Neighborhoods to 724, Inc. (Ordinance 181-2026). - O-263-26 — Amendment to LMCO §32.062 regarding the Juneteenth Jubilee Commission (Ordinance 182-2026). - RP091526SM / RP091526AG — Reappointments of Stephen Miller and Abbie Gilbert to the Transit Authority of River City (TARC) Board, terms expiring June 30, 2029. - R-114-26 — Authorization of up to $6,200,000 in bond anticipation notes for Wesley Manor Retirement Community (Resolution 074-2026). - R-117-26 — $183,960 professional services contract with Mark S. Jorrisch, M.D. for Louisville Metro Public Health and Wellness (Resolution 075-2026). - O-258-26 — Closure of an unnamed and unimproved alley between N. Peterson Avenue and Frankfort Avenue containing approximately 32,383 square feet (Ordinance 183-2026). - R-124-26 — Office of Planning data gathering and analysis in Metro Council District 22 (Resolution 076-2026). - R-122-26 — Acceptance of up to $971,943 from the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet for the Goldsmith Lane Bridge Replacement Project (Resolution 077-2026). - Appointments/reappointments to the Complete Streets Coalition: Kristi Ashby, Adam Stegemann, Brad Herschler, and Mira Sullivan (three-year terms); Janet Heston and Patrick Smith (terms expiring October 31, 2027); Kenneth Thompson and Estela Valdez (terms expiring October 31, 2028). Public Comments & Testimony - Paul Schroeder (executive, American Printing House for the Blind): Described the new 28,000-square-foot DOT Experience museum opening October 30 on the APH campus on Frankfort Avenue, designed with input from blind and low-vision community members, including Helen Keller's archival collection. - Amanda Coolsaet (licensed massage therapist and small business owner): Opposed the massage facility license ordinance (O-286-26), arguing it was written to target sex traffickers but imposes difficult physical-space requirements on legitimate, state-licensed therapists and depends on landlords' willingness to modify leased properties. - Melanie Webb (resident, Shelby Park/Germantown area): Raised concerns about the unpermitted "Two Buck Invitational" graffiti event held September 11-13, citing no permits, porta-potties, trash service, insurance, or fire department sign-off; drug paraphernalia in the neighborhood; tagging of property; and being blocked in for two days. She reported her property taxes rose fivefold in three years to almost $10,000 per year and asked that such events be permitted and regulated. - Barbara Beckett (resident, 1508 West Market Street, age 79): Complained about poor living conditions, at least 15 break-ins, and alleged police surveillance and cameras in her home; asked the Council to investigate New Directions Housing and police conduct. - Ricky Santiago (Executive Director, Americana Community Center): Expressed gratitude for prior Council investments and requested $20,000 in NDF support for general operations, emphasizing the need to fund frontline staff including coordinators, intake workers, and on-site language interpreters. - Lan Nguyen-Colgate (District 21 resident; Vice President, Friends of the Library): Asked the Council to fully fund the Collider Artist-in-Residence Program at the South Central Regional Library at $12,000, describing free workshops, artist stipends, and cultural exchange benefits for an area with limited arts access. - Dr. Ryan Swain (pediatric cardiac anesthesiologist): Urged the Council to endorse the Plant-Based Treaty, citing research showing an 82% regression in coronary heart disease and a 91% reduction in angina among patients on comprehensive plant-based lifestyle programs, and noting heart disease and cancer account for almost 50% of deaths annually in Jefferson County. - Gary Watrous (architect; Renewable Energy Alliance of Louisville; District 5 resident): Asked the Council to "stop, look, and listen" — take a legislative pause, extend the data center moratorium, and review the Kentucky Resources Council's alternative ordinance. He cited attorney Tom Fitzgerald's checklist of legal loopholes, including a 5,000-square-foot threshold he said could be legally challenged. - Christie McCravy (Executive Director, Louisville Affordable Housing Trust Fund): Reported that since 2016 Metro has invested more than $140 million in the trust fund, creating or preserving more than 6,004 housing units (including more than 400 single-family homeownership units) at an average of just over $21,000 per unit, leveraging more than $1.7 billion in additional construction investment; last year the fund received 23 applications but could fund only 7. Discussion Items (Old Business) - O-225-26 — Detailed District Development Plan for 8803, 8805, and 8807 Old Bardstown Road (approximately 7.02 acres, Case 26DDP0005, as amended): Council Members Reed and Bratcher explained that binding elements removed by the Planning Commission were restored to match the Council's original agreement, minus the developer's requested change. Passed 21-0 (Ordinance 184-2026). - O-240-26 — Land Development Code amendment regarding road width (Case 25-LDC-0003, as amended): Establishes a minimum road width of 20 feet for new developments, aligned with state guidance (automatically conforming if the state moves to 22 feet). Council Member Piagentini urged future work on the narrower collector roads that subdivisions feed into. Passed 21-0 (Ordinance 185-2026). - R-116-26 — Local incentives for Cornbread CBD, PBC: Adopted by voice vote. Council Member Raymond noted the company nearly doubled its workforce with average wages around $26 per hour (Resolution 078-2026). - R-121-26 — LMPD Sexual Assault Forensic Examiner (SAFE) Program coordinator contract ($100,000 with University Medical Center, Inc., d/b/a UofL Hospital/James Graham Brown Cancer Center): Passed 20-0-1; Council Member Winkler abstained due to his wife's employment at the University of Louisville (Resolution 079-2026). - R-123-26 — Downtown Management District 2027 Budget and Economic Improvement Plan (amended by substitution): Adopted by voice vote. Council Member Herndon corrected press reports, stating the management district's budget is roughly half of the reported $4.6 million. The amendment was moved by Mulvey-Woolridge, seconded by Bast (Resolution 080-2026). - RP050526BW — Reappointment of Bill Wright to the Complete Streets Coalition (term expires October 31, 2028 [2027], as amended): Approved by voice vote; Council Member Hudson noted the amendment corrects a technical error in the term date. - O-254-26 — Fern Creek Fire Protection District hazardous materials response equipment: Floor-amended from $29,000 to $40,865.16, adding $4,115.16 from District 20 (total $9,115.16), $1,500 from District 10 (total $5,000), $2,500 from District 23, $1,500 from District 3, $500 each from Districts 1, 2, 21, and 25, and $250 from District 5. Passed 20-0 (Ordinance 186-2026). - O-255-26 — $50,000 from District 1 NDF to Louisville Parks and Recreation for District 1 park community events (Algonquin Music Festival; Parkland Day; Pumpkins in the Park; Turkey Day Give-A-Way; Juice Bowl Community Event; Light Up Park DuValle; and Christmas Over District 1): Amended in committee to remove "Parade and" from the Juice Bowl event name. Passed 20-0 (Ordinance 187-2026). - O-256-26 — Americana Community Center, Inc. FY27 operational costs: Floor-amended from $8,000 to $16,500, adding $2,000 from District 3, $1,000 each from Districts 6, 20, and 23, $500 each from Districts 1, 2, 4, 8, 22, and 24, and $250 each from Districts 16 and 25; Council Member Reno-Weber's $500 (District 8) was submitted by email. Passed 20-0 (Ordinance 188-2026). - O-257-26 — Louisville Free Public Library Artist-in-Residence Collider Program at the South Central Regional Library: Floor-amended from $6,250 to $12,000, adding $1,000 each from Districts 21 and 22, $750 from District 3, $500 each from Districts 15, 16, 23, and 25, and $250 each from Districts 1, 6, 12, and 14. Passed 20-0 (Ordinance 189-2026). New Business (First Reading and Committee Assignments) - Equity, Community Affairs, Housing, Health and Education Committee: R-126-26 (commemorating October 2, 2026 as Wrongful Conviction Day and urging state compensation for wrongfully convicted Kentuckians); R-127-26 (honoring October 2 as Nonviolent Louisville Day); R-130-26 (authorizing the Mayor to accept up to $2,000,000 from the Community Foundation of Louisville for the Home for Good Initiative). - Government Oversight/Audit and Appointments Committee: O-265-26 (amending LMCO §32.130 regarding administration of the Policemen's Retirement Fund). - Labor and Economic Development Committee: R-136-26 (local incentives for MedVantx, Inc. under KRS Chapter 154, Subchapter 32). - Parks and Sustainability Committee: R-134-26 (supporting Lights Out Louisville and voluntary reductions in unnecessary nighttime lighting during bird migration seasons). - Planning and Zoning Committee: O-281-26 (zoning of property at 211 South 41st Street, approximately 0.1 acres); O-282-26 (closure of unnamed portions of right-of-way south and southwest of Old Manslick Road, approximately 39,500 square feet). - Public Safety Committee: O-285-26 (amending LMCO Chapters 97 and 115 to expand roadway safety and cleanliness authority); O-286-26 (amending LMCO §§115.170–115.196 regarding massage facilities). - Public Works Committee: R-131-26 (authorizing the Mayor to accept up to $2,000,000 from TARC for the Bus Stop Improvements and Pedestrian Access Upgrades Project). Note: the meeting minutes list R-131-26's attachment as "WITHDRAWN 100626," indicating the item was later withdrawn on October 6, 2026, although it was assigned to committee at this meeting. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar approved 21-0; all 24 items adopted as listed above. - O-225-26 passed 21-0 (Ordinance 184-2026). - O-240-26 passed 21-0 (Ordinance 185-2026). - R-116-26 adopted by voice vote (Resolution 078-2026). - R-121-26 passed 20-0-1, with Winkler abstaining (Resolution 079-2026). - R-123-26 amended by substitution and adopted by voice vote (Resolution 080-2026). - RP050526BW (Bill Wright reappointment) approved by voice vote. - O-254-26 amended to $40,865.16 and passed 20-0 (Ordinance 186-2026). - O-255-26 passed 20-0 (Ordinance 187-2026). - O-256-26 amended to $16,500 and passed 20-0 (Ordinance 188-2026). - O-257-26 amended to $12,000 and passed 20-0 (Ordinance 189-2026). - 11 New Business items received first reading and were assigned to committees. - No announcements were made; the meeting adjourned at 7:26 p.m. The next regular Council meeting is scheduled for Thursday, October 15, 2026, at 6:00 p.m.

The Huntington Zoning Board of Appeals held its regular meeting on the evening of September 24, 2026, at the Town Board Room. The board heard seven public hearings and transacted other business, including de minimis determinations, amended decisions, extensions, and accessory dwelling unit approvals. All votes were unanimous, with conditions applied where noted. Minutes Approval - The board unanimously approved the minutes of the September 3, 2026 meeting after a motion by Mr. McGrath and a second by Mr. Castaño. Public Hearings 1. Adjourned Hearing – 23614 (44 Makamah Beach Rd.) - Applicant: Mark J. Seelig Trustee. The hearing for a side yard and combined side yard variance to legalize an existing deck on the property line was adjourned to December 10, 2026. 2. 23769 – 314 10th Avenue, East Northport (Garage) - Applicant George J. Sutherland III requested accessory structure relief to relocate a proposed detached garage five feet closer to the curb, allowing a 25-foot setback. No public opposition; board observed the site was non-controversial. Motion by Ms. Whalen, second by Mr. Castagna. Granted. 3. 23745 – 126 Spagnoli Road, Melville (Island Harvest Food Bank) - Applicant Randi Dresner/Island Harvest LLC, represented by Rachel Shelfo (Farrell Fritz PC), sought a Special Use Permit, parking relief (from 131 to 79 spaces), sign relief (second freestanding sign at 8.76-foot setback vs. 10-foot required), and lifting of a prior condition from ZBA Case 19345. The property is a 3-acre industrial I2 site used as a food bank headquarters. The request included legalization of existing outdoor storage (refuse enclosure, refrigerated container, pallet storage, shed), overnight parking for 13 trucks and 79 vehicles, and a directional sign. Traffic expert Wayne Muller testified that the parking reduction and sign location would not create congestion or safety issues. No public comments. Board issued a negative declaration under SEQRA. Motion by Mr. Castagna and Mr. Capadano. Granted with the understanding that final site plan approval is needed from the Planning Board. 4. 23751 – 54 Tuscarora Drive, Centerport (Shed) - Applicant Doug Ambrose requested accessory structure relief to legalize an existing 10x10 shed in the front yard, 1.3 feet from the easterly line (2 feet required). The property has a very deep front yard and limited backyard. A neighbor’s letter in support was read. No public opposition. Motion by Mr. Basso, second by Mr. Capadano. Granted. 5. 23737 – 93 Luyster Street, South Huntington (Garage Addition & Portico) - Applicant Steven Lerner, a resident, requested front, side, and rear yard, lot width, and lot area variances to construct a one-story garage addition and front portico on his R40-zoned quarter-acre lot. He cited New York State Town Law §267-B(3)(b) and presented five supporting letters from neighbors. The board noted neighboring lots are similarly sized. No public opposition. Motion by Mr. Bassell, second by Mr. White. Granted. 6. 23749 – 27 Essex Drive, Northport (Garage Addition) - Applicant Harvey Brown requested accessory structure relief to add a third bay (approx. 200 sq. ft.) to an existing two-car detached garage. The garage is 125 feet from the street and downhill. No zoning relief was needed for setbacks. Two neighbors in attendance expressed support. Motion by Mr. Castagna, second by Mr. Capadano. Granted. 7. 23748 – 11 Teaneck Drive, East Northport (Legalization & Second Kitchen) - Applicant Paul Curcio (Christopher Garten Architects) requested front and rear yard relief and permission for a second kitchen to legalize existing construction (enclosed deck, roofed stoop, egress window well, awning over cellar entrance) and add a second kitchen in the finished basement. All structures were already built without permits. The property was upzoned from R10 to R20 in 1947. The board stressed that second kitchens are rarely granted and imposed a sunset condition: the second kitchen must be completely removed if the elderly father (for whom it was installed) leaves the residence. No public opposition. Motion by Ms. Whalen, second by Mr. White. Granted with conditions. Other Business Before the Board - De Minimis Variations (Building Department requests): - 12 Greendale Lane, East Northport: existing side yard of 19.68 ft (20 ft required) – approved as de minimis. - 889 Columbia Street: existing front yard of 19.2 ft (20 ft required) – approved as de minimis. - Amended Decision – ZBA 22647 (Benchmark Senior Living): The board approved an amended decision confirming that the applicant does not need to re-appear, because the prior grant had not expired and notice under General Municipal Law §239-M had been provided to Suffolk County, which left the matter to local determination. - Extension – ZBA 23040: Third extension granted for site work permits and certificate of occupancy, as fees had been paid. - Accessory Dwelling Units: Preliminary approval was given for two ADU applications (24 Bainbridge Avenue, Melville – 645 sq. ft. one-bedroom; and 8 Trafalgar Court, Huntington – 420 sq. ft. two-bedroom in existing garage conversion), subject to Suffolk County referral, as no additional relief was required. Key Outcomes - All six public hearings resolved were granted: one adjourned, five with unanimous votes, one with a sunset condition. - De minimis variations, amended decision, extension, and ADU approvals passed without opposition. - The next meeting was set for October 1, 2026.

The Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners held its final budget public hearing on September 24, 2026, to adopt the Fiscal Year 2027 millage rates, budget, and the five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The meeting included public testimony from approximately 70 speakers, with major topics including funding for a new Pet Resource Center (PRC) and continued funding for the Florida Israel Business Accelerator (FIBA). The board ultimately adopted the millage resolution, budget resolution, and CIP resolution, each with a 5-1 vote. Consent Calendar - Three flagged items (from Commissioners Miller, Wolstall, and the Chair) were approved by unanimous consent. Public Comments & Testimony - Pet Resource Center (PRC): Numerous speakers (including Dr. Betsy Covell, John Marinello, Ann Malone, Nadine Samuraja, Emma Prescott, Ashley Foster, Carly Lou, Joyce Diaz, and others) urged immediate funding for a new shelter, citing 40-year-old facilities, lack of air conditioning, extreme overcrowding (320 dogs at 177% capacity, 800% above cat capacity), and staff challenges. They emphasized that the current facility is a clinical and sanitary emergency and that the county had previously identified CIT funding. Several speakers (e.g., Brian Boger) requested specific deliverables and immediate equipment purchases. - Florida Israel Business Accelerator (FIBA): A majority of speakers (including Nadia Askar, Rhea Shringeri, Joshua Brown, Faris Shaheen, David Zulian, and others) demanded removal of all FIBA funding, arguing it supports Israeli military technology used in alleged human rights violations, and that funds should instead address local needs like housing, transit, and social programs. Some speakers (e.g., Renitinos, Daniel Shannon Stein, Ben) supported FIBA, citing job creation (875 high-wage jobs, 120+ companies, $1.6 billion raised) and economic development. - Other Topics: Linda Logston requested that stadium-related CIT funds be frozen until drainage improvements are made in her neighborhood (West Park Estates). Mark Clutho criticized the stadium funding and budget growth. Several speakers addressed flood risks and infrastructure. Discussion Items - Budget Overview: County Administrator Bonnie Wise and Budget Director Kevin Brickie presented the FY27 budget: $13.78 billion total, $4.77 billion operating (22% public safety). The millage rate represents a 0.40% increase from the rolled-back rate. The budget maintains services and invests in public safety, transportation, stormwater, parks, and the PRC. - CIP Overview: The five-year CIP totals $5 billion, including funding for new fire stations, jail improvements, road projects, and $13 million for the Pet Resource Center facility replacement. An additional $30 million in CIT funding was identified but requires a separate public hearing. - Chair's Clarification on PRC: The Chair stated there are no plans to delay or change the PRC project. The county administrator will provide an update in the fall, and Commissioner Miller requested quarterly public updates with milestones, scope, and funding status. The $13 million in CIP and $30 million in CIT (after required hearing) are the current funding path. Key Outcomes - Millage Resolution: Adopted 5-1 (Commissioner Caramasopeta voted no). The proposed aggregate millage rate is 8.6864 mills (0.40% increase from rolled-back). Countywide general revenue: 3.9701 mills; unincorporated MSTU: 4.7163 mills. - Budget Resolution: Adopted 5-1 (Commissioner Caramasopeta voted no), approving the FY27 budget as presented. - CIP Resolution: Adopted 5-1 (Commissioner Caramasopeta voted no), approving the FY27-FY31 Capital Improvement Program. - PRC Next Steps: Staff directed to provide quarterly updates; the CIP includes $13 million for the PRC facility, with the $30 million CIT allocation to be considered at a future public hearing. No immediate changes to project scope or schedule were made.

The Howard County Council held a continuation of its September legislative public hearing on September 24, 2026, to receive testimony on several bills and resolutions. The hearing covered Council Bill 59-2026 (temporary hold on solar energy facilities), financial bond authorizations (CB49–CB51), property tax credits for day care providers (CB52) and retired public safety officers (CB53), and resolutions supporting the Arts & Culture Plan (CR159), the Bicycle Master Plan update (CR160), and establishing a Surplus School Use Committee (CR161). Council members heard from dozens of residents, organizational representatives, and county staff. No votes were taken; a work session is scheduled for September 28 and a legislative session for October 5. Public Comments & Testimony CB59-2026 – Solar Collector Facilities Temporary Hold - Jeff Polak (Ellicott City) testified in support, expressing concern that preserved farmland would be covered with solar panels and that the process lacks checks and balances for neighboring property owners. - Doug Siglin (District 5) testified in opposition, urging the council to reject the bill. He stated that Howard County has become a state leader in solar energy and that a moratorium would undermine the county's climate goals and its Climate Forward plan. - John Lennon Miller (Woodstock, District 5) testified in opposition, arguing that the bill conflicts directly with state law (the Renewable Energy Certainty Act) and is unnecessary because the county is already in compliance. He acknowledged working for a solar developer but said he was testifying as a resident. - Shannon Singleton (Woodbine) testified in support, stating the bill is about good governance due to a serious lack of clarity and transparency in the current process. - Ryan O'Connor (West Friendship) testified in strong support, calling the bill a common-sense pause to resolve unanswered questions, and criticized a fiscal analysis that conflated federal tax credits with county revenue losses. - Nader Cain (no residence given) testified in opposition, suggesting the bill is a half-measure and that the council should instead adopt the stricter of two existing regulatory paths as an interim solution. - Barbara Baker (Woodbine) testified in support, citing lack of clear standards, the absence of an owner-operator requirement for solar leases, and the lack of a cap on solar farms in agricultural preservation areas. - Michael McAllister (Woodbine) testified in support, noting that the state law says existing easements cannot be impaired, yet the county's implementation memo preserves county rights, creating confusion. He also cited a 2025 study estimating that nearby residential values could fall 4.8%. - Ian Nagengast (Woodbine) testified in support, stating the temporary pause is needed to understand how county rules will fit state requirements and to define what "farmland forever" means. - Gail Mackison (Woodbine) testified in support, highlighting that Howard County is the only district in the state that allows solar on preserved land and that the pause would allow time to address unintended consequences. - Elizabeth Franks (Woodbine) testified in strong support, emphasizing that large-scale solar projects are moving forward faster than communities can evaluate them. - Colt Romberger (testimony read by Kathy Heckman) testified in support, expressing concerns about environmental impacts, property values, and the lack of public service commission review for projects between one and two megawatts. - Ryan Powers (Glenwood) testified in support, drawing a parallel to the county's recent data center pause and stating that solar panels on preserved land destroy the land. - Jim Heckman (Woodbine) testified in support, noting that utility-scale solar on preserved land violates the intent of agricultural preservation and that a temporary pause would allow for more study. - Gene Bolton (residence not stated) testified in opposition, arguing that the county's climate goals require continued solar development, that stopping projects would harm solar companies and low-income families, and that the bill would put the county on the side of those who want to kill solar. - Ruth White (on behalf of Howard County Climate Action) testified in opposition, stating that the bill is irresponsible and that any delay makes the county's 2030 greenhouse gas reduction goals less attainable. She noted that delays could jeopardize federal tax credits and that state law prohibits local jurisdictions from prohibiting solar projects. - Spencer Rhoda (delegate candidate) testified in support, raising concerns about transparency and a potential conflict of interest involving a named councilmember. He demanded protection of farmland that the public has already paid to preserve. - Gary Cooper (Woodbine) testified in support, arguing that the county needs time to determine what local authority remains and to ensure proper placement of solar panels, citing viewshed and glare issues. - Casey Meinike (Woodbine) testified in support, describing how her family moved to Howard County expecting preserved land to remain farmland, and now faces a proposed solar project behind her home. She asked the council to define what preservation means. - Matt Wilhite (residence not stated) testified in support, stating that government needs to pause to catch up with private industry and that the bill is about good governance and protecting residents. CB49-2026, CB50-2026, CB51-2026 – Bond Authorizations - Rafi Hila, County Director of Finance, testified in favor of all three bills, explaining that CB49 authorizes up to $670,397 in bonds through the Maryland Water Infrastructure Financing Administration (MWIFA) at an interest rate under 2.5%, with about 475% expected to be forgiven (this appears to be a misstatement; the transcript says "approximately 475%, is expected to be forgiven" which likely means 47.5% or a similar figure). CB50 authorizes up to $150 million in consolidated public improvement bonds and $50 million in metropolitan district bonds to finance capital projects. CB51 authorizes refunding bonds to refinance outstanding debt at favorable rates. - Matt Wilhite (public) raised concerns about contingency funds and the total debt level, questioning why the county adds new bonds and asking for more transparency on the Ellicott City flood mitigation project costs. CB52-2026 – Credit for Day Care Providers and Additional Childcare Credits - Rafi Hila testified in favor, stating the bill expands daycare tax credits to support more than 400 child and adult care providers and encourage new providers. CB53-2026 – Public Safety Officer Tax Credit – Retired Public Safety Officers - Rafi Hila testified in favor and thanked the council for his service. - Wayne Livesay (former Howard County Police Chief) testified in support, recounting his 34 years of service and stating that many retirees find it difficult to balance budgets on pensions. He argued the credit helps retain retirees in the county. - Chuck Ridgely (President, Howard County Professional Firefighters Retired Association) testified in support, asking the council to say thank you to retirees. - Nader Cain testified in opposition, questioning why the benefit is targeted at public safety retirees rather than other vulnerable populations, and suggesting pension adjustments instead. - Jim Daly (President, Howard County Police Supervisors Alliance) testified in strong support, stating that the credit demonstrates appreciation for sacrifices made by public safety officers and helps with recruitment and retention. - Matt Wilhite testified in support, arguing that keeping retirees in the county benefits the community and that the credit is a small token of respect. - Alan Schneider (Clarksville) testified in support but suggested the concept should be expanded to include other retired public servants like teachers and crossing guards. - Andy Liebno (Lisbon, District 5, via WebEx) testified in support, providing historical context that the state law was changed in 2023 to allow retirees but was never brought to the council until now. CR159-2026 – Supporting the Arts & Culture Plan - Colleen West (Executive Director, Howard County Arts Council) testified in favor, describing the plan as a 10-year blueprint developed with over 1,300 participants through surveys, workshops, and a 31-member steering committee. She stated the plan complements the county's general plan and prioritizes arts as a tool for economic strength and community belonging. CR160-2026 – Approving BikeHoward 2026 - Chris Eton (Howard County Office of Transportation) testified in favor, stating the plan updates the 2016 master plan, incorporates new analytical tools, and was developed with extensive public input (361 comments). The plan is aspirational and not fiscally binding; capital funding for bike infrastructure is expected to remain at about $1 million per year. - Nader Kane testified, stating he does not oppose the plan but requested striking the request for designation from the League of American Bicyclists, arguing the county has not earned that designation and it misrepresents current infrastructure. - Jason Hummel (Laurel) testified in opposition to the inclusion of the Kindler-Edenbrook Bridge project, stating the feasibility study predetermined a solution and that an alternative (upgrading the Old Columbia Road Bridge) would be less expensive and less impactful. He asked the council to delay approval until the plan is revised. - Ted Cochran (Columbia, representing Free Bikes for Kids) testified in support, emphasizing that safe bike routes are critical for children and that the plan will improve connectivity. - Antoine Wright (Chair, Howard County Multimodal Transportation Board) testified in strong support, stating that the plan delivers on the county's vision of connected, sustainable growth and that safe bikeways are public facilities that belong in how the county plans development. - Emily Ranson (Chair, Howard County Bicycle Advisory Group) testified in support, sharing a personal story about her child's safety and urging approval. CR161-2026 – Establishing a Surplus School Use Committee - Emily Ayaki (Chief, Bureau of Real Estate Management) testified in favor, explaining that the Howard County Board of Education determined a 4.5815-acre parcel (Lot 2) at the Central Office site is no longer needed for educational purposes and intends to transfer it to the county for Fire Station 15. The resolution creates a committee to study the disposition as required by county code. Discussion Items Council members engaged with several speakers: - Councilmember Yungmann asked John Lennon Miller whether he agreed with attorneys who said the Renewable Energy Certainty Act may not preempt agricultural preservation easements. Miller agreed that existing easements cannot be overruled but said that does not change the situation in Howard County because pre-RECA allowances for solar on ag-pres land already existed. - Councilmember Yungmann questioned Gene Bolton about her support for a recent data center pause but opposition to the solar pause. She replied that solar has been studied extensively while data centers are newer. - Councilmember Walsh asked Director Hila about "other sources" in the bond backup; Hila explained the MWIFA loan is considered other sources. Walsh also expressed frustration that the Ellicott City flood mitigation project continues to grow in cost, from about $200 million to an estimated $412 million. - Councilmember Walsh questioned the timing and policy of CB53, asking why the council should pass the bill in its final months. Director Hila responded that bills are brought forward when due diligence is complete. Councilmember Jung expressed support for the bill, stating she values retirees staying in the county. - On CR160, Councilmember Yungmann asked Nader Kane about spending on bike infrastructure versus other needs. Kane responded that his testimony was focused on the designation, not the plan itself. Key Outcomes - No votes were taken during the public hearing. The council is scheduled to hold a work session on Monday, September 28, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. in the C. Running Gray Room to discuss the legislation further. - A legislative session for final consideration of certain bills will be held on Monday, October 5, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. - Written testimony will continue to be accepted and fully considered by the council prior to taking action.