The Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners convened on September 16, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. The meeting included proclamations, public comments, a consent agenda, and several discussion items covering the Community Investment Tax (CIT) Phase IV project list, an interlocal agreement with the University of South Florida (USF), updates on the Riverview Community Plan and Selmon Expressway extension, the 2027 Annual Audit Plan, Sheriff's Office camera program reports, a public-private partnership with ZooTampa, an interlocal agreement with the Hillsborough Soil and Water Conservation District, school impact fee exemptions for farm worker housing, a feasibility study on reinstating the cone of silence, and an owner's representative agreement for the Tampa Bay Rays ballpark. Consent Calendar - Approved 7-0: Consent agenda including routine approvals and contracts. Commissioner Boles noted documentation concerns regarding Item A-8 (NAACP agreement) but confirmed staff monitoring on a reimbursement basis. Public Comments & Testimony - Tom Cobert expressed support for the USF CIT projects and ZooTampa partnership. - Sergeant Doss (veteran) requested an audit line for county-funded court functions and raised due process concerns. - John Green opposed the NAACP funding agreement (Item A-8), alleging violations of school property policies and electioneering rules. - Bishop Michelle Patty requested due diligence and audits for the NAACP contract, noting past non-performance. - Hannah Lamport raised concerns about threatening rhetoric toward commissioners during previous public comments, calling for a clear line against intimidation. - Annette (virtual) echoed concerns about threats and asked for standards to prevent intimidation. - Tamir Ben David (virtual) defended Israeli businesses and rejected genocide accusations against Israel. - Catherine (IAC director) emphasized the need for factual discourse and youth leadership programs. - Don Shimmer (virtual) expressed fear after recent comments and asked the board to address intimidation. - Alon Giovanni (virtual) urged the board to focus on county budget criteria rather than international politics. - Catherine Vickers requested traffic safety improvements (speed tables or reduced speed limit) for Park Creek neighborhood in Riverview. - Dr. Betsy Covell advocated for a new pet resource center (PRC), citing inadequate funding (56 cents per resident vs. $6.43 in Pinellas) and cruel conditions (no A/C for dogs). - John Marinello criticized delays on the animal shelter, linking it to $800 million allocated for the Rays stadium, and questioned why funds were not available. - Ann Malone asked for clarity on FY27 budget for PRC, noting one washing machine for 450+ animals and no A/C. - Amy Summers requested full funding for a new PRC with central heat and air, describing volunteer experiences during 115°F heat index. Discussion Items - D-1 & B-1 (10:00 a.m.) – CIT Phase IV Public Hearing & USF Interlocal Agreement: The board conducted a public hearing on adding three projects to the Phase IV CIT list: Fletcher District Transportation Improvement, Sheriff's Infrastructure Maintenance, and Sheriff's IT & Communications Equipment. One speaker (Tom Cobert) supported. The board then approved both the resolution adding the projects (7-0) and the $24 million interlocal agreement with USF for infrastructure improvements related to the Fletcher District development (7-0). - F-2 (10:15 a.m.) – Riverview Community Plan & THEA Selmon Expressway Extension Update: Planning Commission and Tampa Hillsborough Expressway Authority (THEA) presented updates. Over 225 participants in community meetings, 1,300 survey responses. Top priorities: transportation/connectivity, infrastructure, recreation/environment. THEA extended the project to Sun City (SR 674). Traffic analysis shows deteriorating conditions; planning timeline targets FY29 program development. The report was received without a vote. - B-2 (10:30 a.m.) – 2027 Annual Audit Plan: County Internal Auditor presented the risk-based plan, approved by the Audit Committee. Board approved 7-0. - B-3 & B-4 (10:45 a.m.) – Sheriff's Camera Program Annual Reports: - Red Light Camera Program (July 2025–July 2026): 22,097 notices of violation (NOVs) issued; 13,799 paid; $2,180,002.15 total revenue; $1,039,199.90 retained by County. Approved 7-0. - School Speed Zone Camera Program: 154,262 NOVs issued; 103,338 paid; total revenue $10,334,600; distributed among public safety, school district, crossing guard program, vendor, etc. Approved 7-0. - F-1 – Soil and Water Conservation District Interlocal Agreement: Commissioner Boles moved to authorize negotiations for an ILA with performance measures, citing hidden costs ($30K technology, $99K maintenance, plus legal fees). Seconded. Board approved 7-0. - G-1 – Options for Removing School Impact Fees for Farm Worker Housing: Staff presented options; H2A farm worker housing has no school-age children. The Agricultural Economic Development Council endorsed. Board approved 7-0 to adopt Option 1: non-assessment of school impact fees for H2A-only projects. - G-2 & F-3 (11:00 a.m.) – ZooTampa Capital Funding Proposal & Partnership: - Staff presented ZooTampa's $75 million county funding request (matched 1:1, total $150 million) for expansion and habitat renovations. Other capital requests ($90 million total) from Florida Aquarium, Glazer Children's Museum, Straz Center, History Center, Tampa Theatre were noted. - Commissioner Hagan recommended a formal process for all cultural institutions. Commissioner Wostal moved to receive the report only (substitute motion). That motion carried 5-2 (Hagan and Cohen dissenting). - Immediately after, Commissioner Wostal moved to finalize the public-private partnership with ZooTampa (F-3), directing staff to finalize the contract and schedule a CIT public hearing. Motion carried 4-3 (Hagan, Cohen, Myers dissenting). - G-3 – Feasibility of Reinstating the Cone of Silence Framework: Staff presented options. Commissioner Myers moved to reinstate the pre-2023 framework (starts at bid issuance, ends at award). Motion failed 3-4. Board then voted 7-0 to receive the report. - A-6 – Interlocal Agreement with Tampa Sports Authority for Owner's Representative Services: Removed from consent. Commissioner Wostal questioned advancing funds ($300,000 initially) from county general fund reserves before other ballpark agreements were finalized, noting no clawback if the project fails. Commissioner Cohen supported, citing value engineering. Approved 5-2 (Cameron Cepeda and Wostal dissenting). Key Outcomes - Approved: CIT Phase IV project additions (7-0); USF interlocal agreement (7-0); 2027 Annual Audit Plan (7-0); Sheriff's red light camera report (7-0); Sheriff's school speed zone report (7-0); ILA negotiations with Soil and Water Conservation District (7-0); exemption of school impact fees for H2A farm worker housing (7-0); ZooTampa public-private partnership (4-3); TSA owner's representative agreement (5-2). - Received: Riverview Community Plan/THEA update; ZooTampa capital funding report; cone of silence feasibility report. - Failed: Motion to reinstate prior cone of silence framework (3-4). - Future Items: Commissioner Miller requested quarterly updates on Pet Resource Center facility improvements, evaluation of unallocated HOPE funds for PRC, and quarterly updates on Lithia Pinecrest Road widening/corridor improvements.
The Public Meeting Index
The Public Meeting IndexThe Lake County Drainage Board convened on September 16, 2026, at 9:00 AM following the Advisory Committee meeting at 8:00 AM. The board addressed several agenda items including township reports, updates on drainage projects, approval of emergency obstruction removal invoices, and a crop damage reimbursement related to the Hanover Ditch investigation. No public comments were made. Reports – Correspondence – Information for the Record - Advisory Committee members provided township updates: Cody Reynolds (St. John Township) reported ongoing drainage issues at the Marshall property and along 145th Avenue; John (Eagle Creek Township) noted drainage concerns from a property owner on West Creek and followed up on John Kramer's West Creek maintenance. The board acknowledged that a contractor has been occupied with disaster recovery since August 11 and will address West Creek debris once available. - County Surveyor Bill Emerson Jr. reported that the clearing and snagging crew has been active post-storm, and he obtained his drone pilot license to assist with emergency assessments. He also noted the Little Calumet River Basin Development Commission meeting and the DNR certificate of approval for West Creek Lateral 4. - The board approved the reports (motion carried unanimously). Applications/Petitions - Application 493-11-25 (Turkey Creek Lateral 5): A long-standing violation; the property owner is working at his own expense to improve conditions. The board will continue to monitor and allow latitude. No action needed. - Application 501-03-26 (Spring Run Ditch): Waiting for resubmittal from the applicant (Brooker Family). No action. - Application 519-06-26 (West Creek & West Creek Lat 1): Still awaiting resubmittal from Schilling Development. No action. MS4 Water Quality - Leroy Community Center Drainage (Winfield Twp.): The ecological restoration with trees has been completed; the project continues to move forward. The board noted potential partnership funding through the township roads and infrastructure fund. - Fill Removal at 11624 Woodmar Place (Hanover Twp.): Agreement in place; no update. Financial – Emergency Obstruction Removal Invoices - The board approved the following invoices individually (all motions carried unanimously): - KDM Invoice 26172 – Turkey Creek (Schererville) emergency obstruction removal: $7,380.00 - KDM Invoices 26157 ($29,772.50) and 26169 ($17,705.00) – Turkey Creek Lats 6 & 7 (Merrillville) emergency obstruction removal: $47,477.50 total - KDM Invoices 26173 ($1,540.00) and 26174 ($48,985.00) – Schoon Ditch (Munster) emergency obstruction removal: $50,525.00 total - Payment of $200.00 to Tom Larson for beaver relocation and dam removal (Turkey Creek Lat 7 near Bon Aire Lake) Crop Damage Reimbursement – Hanover Ditch Investigation - The board approved a payment of $333.35 to Mr. Klein for crop losses incurred during the drainage investigation on Hanover Ditch, as recommended by the Surveyor. Award Contract - The board approved the Notice of Award for the 2026 Foss Ditch 2-Stage Ditch Project (Cedar Creek Twp., near 153rd Ave & Colfax St). The project is expected to start soon. Key Outcomes - All emergency obstruction removal invoices approved. - Crop damage reimbursement approved. - Contract awarded for Foss Ditch project. - No public comments. - Next meeting scheduled for Wednesday, October 21, 2026 at 8:00 AM (Advisory Committee) and 9:00 AM (Drainage Board).
The Howard County Zoning Board held a hybrid administrative meeting on September 16, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. to review and vote on proposed draft changes to the Rules of Procedure for the Zoning Board and the Zoning Board Hearing Examiner. The board had discussed the revisions at an administrative meeting on September 14, and a revised draft was sent to board members on September 15. A quorum was present, and the meeting was livestreamed for the public. Discussion Items - Zoning Board Rules of Procedure: Staff reviewed the proposed changes, including: - A requested reference to prior comprehensive rezoning related to the zoning counsel role; the board agreed this would be incorporated into accompanying code changes rather than the rules themselves. - A new state code reference for political contribution disclosure affidavits, which would also require conforming code amendments. - A typographical cleanup noted by one board member. - Clarified language for the administrative meeting scheduling process: if at least three board members request an administrative meeting within five days, the chair shall call it; otherwise the petition automatically defaults to referral to the hearing examiner. Legal advisor Mr. Moore noted one phrase implied a board decision where the process is actually a default, but the board agreed the draft language was sufficient. - The most substantive debate concerned paragraph 5 on the zoning board receiving new evidence during exceptions. Chairperson Youngman and Ms. Walsh opposed the stricter proposed language, saying the existing code is less prescriptive and has been working. Ms. Rigby expressed concern that some parties could use exceptions to game the process and get a last word, but she ultimately agreed to strike the provision because the problem had occurred only once and the next board could revisit it if necessary. Dr. Jones also supported letting the next zoning board decide. - Hearing Examiner Rules of Procedure: After approving the Zoning Board rules, Chairperson Youngman moved to approve the corresponding proposed draft of the Zoning Board Hearing Examiner Rules of Procedure with the same paragraph 5 removed. The motion was seconded. - Zoning Counsel Contract: At the end of the meeting, the board noted that the zoning counsel contract renewal is not a Zoning Board action but a County Council action. The board planned to discuss it before the next legislative public session on Tuesday, September 22, 2026. Key Outcomes - The board voted unanimously (5-0) to approve the proposed Zoning Board Rules of Procedure draft with paragraph 5 stricken. - The board voted unanimously (5-0) to approve the proposed Zoning Board Hearing Examiner Rules of Procedure draft with the same paragraph removed. - Staff will finalize the documents, make them available on the Zoning Board website, and advertise the proposals. - A public hearing on the proposed rules will be held Monday, October 19, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. in the Banneker Room and virtually. Registration to testify is required by 6:00 p.m. that day. - Written testimony may be submitted by email to councilboard@howardcountymd.gov until 5:00 p.m. on Monday, November 2, 2026, per Section 2.407 of the Howard County Zoning Board Rules of Procedure. - A final adoption meeting is planned for the week of November 2, 2026. - The Zoning Counsel contract renewal was referred to the County Council for handling the following week.
The Queen Creek Town Council held a regular meeting on September 16, 2026, at 6:30 PM in Community Chambers. The meeting included ceremonial recognitions, committee reports, public comment, and a series of final action votes on water and wastewater rate notices of intention. Council also heard a presentation on high-impact transportation projects. Ceremonial Matters - Constitution Week was recognized; winners of the Constitution Week Poetry and Art Contest were announced (Brooklyn Jones, Rory Maristica, Holland Maristica, Efe Lee). - Proclamations declared National Adult Education and Family Literacy Week (Sept. 13-19) and Military Families Month. - Queen Creek's Mayor's Teen Advisory Committee received the Arizona Parks and Recreation Youth Enrichment Award. - Christabel Eminem was recognized as a Hometown Hero Leader of Tomorrow and a three-year MTAC member. Committee Reports - Mayor's Teen Advisory Committee (MTAC) reported on August 11 and September 15 meetings, including plans for Teen Fall Fest on October 17. - Downtown Arts & Placemaking Committee (DTAP) met September 3; elected new chair and vice chair, reviewed mural proposals for Switch Air Development, and judged Constitution Week contest entries. - Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee (PRAC) met September 8; received updates on QC Heat Softball (548 participants, 153 volunteers, 19,000+ hours), water strategy, MTAC work plan, Placer AI data, and park usage report. Six new members were welcomed. - Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) met September 10; approved minutes, elected new chair and vice chair, and received updates on general plan update, water strategy, CIP, and low-cost high-impact transportation projects. Public Comments & Testimony Public comment included one speaker on non-agenda items (concerns about Flock cameras) and multiple speakers on the water rate proposals. - G. Richie expressed concerns about Flock cameras, citing potential for misuse and abuse. - Eli Slover (irrigation customer, 30-year resident) stated his annual water bill would rise from $7,700 in year one to nearly $21,000 by year six under the proposed fee, totaling over $83,000 over six years. He questioned why CAGRIT-exempt properties and septic system users (who return water to the aquifer) receive no credit. - Fernando Vigil (21-year resident, irrigation customer) said the proposed fee would represent about a quarter of his annual salary and argued the town overbuilt without planning for water. - Wendy Feldman Kerr (civil designer) supported reliable water supply but asked for a customer impact analysis for rural and agricultural large-lot properties, particularly septic and CAGRIT-exempt properties, before adopting the fee. - Wendy (last name not given) urged council to stop the process and return with a more equitable plan, noting that for her 33-year property the water bill could exceed property taxes. - Robert Schneider (county island, irrigation customer) said his year-one monthly fees alone would be $440 on a current $300 bill, and by year six his annual bill could reach $100,000, jeopardizing retirement. He warned of a "camel's nose under the tent." - Lance Coleman (irrigation customer) requested that flood irrigation customers be removed from the water resource fee or that it be postponed until a separate irrigation cost-of-service study is completed. He cited a 445% first-year increase (from $391 to $2,131 per month) and questioned why customers reach full rate in six years while debt repayment spans 40 years. - Amanda Parker (water-only and irrigation customer) argued the fee structure disproportionately burdens large-lot properties, noting water-only households use 45% more water but receive no wastewater credit, while multifamily developments (e.g., 250+ apartments) receive an 80% credit. She requested that a usage study be made public. - CJ Og (Orchard Ranch resident) said the fee would destroy the "grandfather clause" water right that allows horse ownership and would end the equine agribusiness community. He objected to the fee not being put to a popular vote. - Gregory Beers (engineer, 2-acre property) stated his year-six bill could exceed $200,000. He questioned why flood irrigation customers should pay a replenishment fee when the water naturally returns to the aquifer. He said he would shut off irrigation if the fee passed. Discussion Items Water and Wastewater Rate Notices of Intention (Items 9A-9F) Deputy Town Manager Scott McCarty presented a detailed proposal to start the 60-day public hearing process for six rate and fee adjustments: - New development water capacity fee (one-time, paid by new development) - New development water resource capacity fee (one-time) - Adjustment and increase of water rate cost-of-service fees (ongoing) - New water resource fee (ongoing, based on replenishment, not consumption) - Increase in wastewater rate cost-of-service fees - Increase in solid waste rates and fees Key points from the presentation: - The water resource fee would be phased in over six years for single-family homes. For combined water/wastewater accounts (average 9,000 gallons), year-one fee would be $16/month (total new bill $16), increasing to $24 in year two. For water-only accounts (average 13,000 gallons), year-one fee would be $40/month ($40 increase), rising to $59 in year two. - A 40% wastewater credit applies to combined accounts; no credit for septic users. - The fee is intended to replace the CAGRIT assessments the town has been offsetting for seven years. - Communication and Marketing Director Constance Hallen and Deputy Finance Director Marcus Steele outlined an online rate calculator (queencreekaz.gov/waterfuture) and a schedule of public meetings and office hours. - For HOAs and irrigation customers, staff summarized aggregate impacts: HOAs represent 20% of replenishment requirement; net impact after CAGRIT offsets would be $800,000 increase in year one. Flood irrigation customers represent 5% of replenishment; year-one fee cost $1.5 million, with fully phased annual bill over $5 million. Public comment on the items (summarized above) raised strong concerns about disproportionate impacts on irrigation, large-lot, and CAGRIT-exempt customers. Utilities Director Mark Skosepik acknowledged the concerns and stated staff is developing alternatives to address irrigation and other equity issues, with details to be presented at the next meeting. Mayor Wheatley and council members affirmed the fee structure is not final and that the 60-day process allows refinement. They committed to studying alternative phasing and structures, particularly for irrigation customers. The council then voted on each Notice of Intention: - Item 9A (new development water capacity fee): Approved 7-0. - Item 9B (new development water resource capacity fee): Approved 7-0. - Item 9C (water rate cost-of-service fee increase): Approved 7-0. - Item 9D (new water resource fee): Approved 7-0. - Item 9E (wastewater rate cost-of-service fee increase): Approved 7-0. - Item 9F (solid waste rates and fees): Approved 7-0. Presentation: CIP Update CIP Director Dave Lapinski provided a brief update on capital projects, including the police department headquarters (full building permit obtained), Power Road project (base pavement complete, slurry seal planned), and ARPA-funded water projects (tanks, mainline water lines). Discussion and Direction on High-Impact Transportation Projects Transportation Director Mohammed Yousuf and Deputy Director Julian Driesang presented a list of 20 low-cost high-impact transportation projects (turn lanes, median modifications, short widenings, etc.) totaling about $5 million in programmed funds. A prioritization matrix resulted in four tiers. Staff will request proposals from contractors if council supports the approach. Council expressed strong support for the program, noting its positive impact on daily commutes. Consent Calendar - Item 8A: Approved minutes of September 2, 2026 Special and Regular Meetings (unanimous). - Item 8B: Approved a cost-reimbursable grant from ADEQ ($58,120) and a cooperative contract with Kary Environmental for HHW curbside collection (up to $160,000 annually), with budget adjustment. - Item 8C: Approved Project Order 04 for Black & Veatch (CIP WW200: Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facility) and budget adjustment of $685,905. - Item 8D: Approved IGA with Maricopa County and Mesa for Sossaman Road and Germann Road Intersection Improvement Project. - Item 8E: Approved professional services contract with MGT Consulting (up to $150,000 plus $50,000 contingency) to update impact fees. - Item 8F: Approved Resolution 1679-26 for property acquisition along Rittenhouse Road and Cloud Road for roadway improvements. - Item 8G: Approved Delegation Resolution 1681-26 for Fleet Maintenance Facility expansion (up to $23,000,000). Public Hearing Consent Agenda - Item 10A: Series 6 Bar Liquor License for Kilkenny's Irish Pub (approved unanimously). - Item 10B: Series 7 Beer & Wine Bar Liquor License for The Sacred Pint (approved unanimously). Public Hearings - Item 11A: Public hearing for Case P26-0080 Carder Development Parking Lot Expansion annexation (0.72 acres). This was the first required annexation hearing; no action taken. Key Outcomes - All six Notice of Intention resolutions (9A-9F) were approved 7-0, initiating a 60-day public process leading to a November 18, 2026 public hearing on final adoption of the new and increased water, wastewater, and solid waste rates and fees. Council and staff committed to investigating alternatives for irrigation and large-lot customers. - Consent agenda and public hearing consent agenda items were approved unanimously. - The council expressed strong support for the High-Impact Transportation Projects program; staff will proceed with requesting proposals. - The meeting adjourned at approximately 8:50 PM after a brief recess.
The Lake County Board of Zoning Appeals met on September 16, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. to hear ten petitions including one special exception and nine variance requests. All items were decided, with the first petition deferred to a future meeting and the remainder approved unanimously. Consent Calendar - Minutes: The August 19, 2026 minutes were approved unanimously by voice vote. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public spoke for or against any petition during the public comment periods. Discussion Items - Item 1 (26-SE-06) – Van Kalker Family Limited Partnership / Foundry Works Energy Storage: A request for a special exception to allow a Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) in a CD district. The board noted this was deferred by the Plan Commission and will appear on the October 21, 2026 BZA agenda; no action taken. - Items 5, 6, 7 (26-V-15, 26-V-16, 26-V-17) – Joseph and Trish Coffman: Three related variances for a 40'x60' accessory building at 8123 W. 89th Place, St. John Township. The petitioners requested: (5) increase maximum floor area from 1,525 to 2,400 sq. ft.; (6) increase maximum building height from 20 ft. to 26 ft.; (7) allow the building in the side yard instead of rear yard only. Mr. Coffman explained the building is needed for a motorhome and to care for his stepfather with dementia. No public opposition. All three variances were approved unanimously. - Item 8 (26-V-19) – John Fiedler: Variance to allow an accessory building in the side yard at 14124 W. 130th Place, Hanover Township. The petitioner stated an existing septic field prevents rear-yard placement. Approved unanimously. - Item 9 (26-V-21) – Noah Gatto: Variance to reduce the minimum street setback from 50 ft. to 34 ft. along W. 155th Avenue, Cedar Creek Township, to allow an addition and covered porch. Approved unanimously. - Item 10 (26-V-22) – Sherry Emigh: Variance to allow an accessory building in the side yard at 241 Island Drive, Cedar Creek Township. The petitioner explained the pie-shaped lot and lakefront location make side-yard placement necessary. Approved unanimously. - Items 2, 3, 4 (26-UV-06, 26-V-14, 26-V-20) – Justin Davis / Nathan Vis: Three related petitions for a lot at 15806 Hilltop Drive, Cedar Creek Township. Initially deferred due to missing attorney, the board later proceeded after the attorney was found. The petitioners requested: (2) variance of use to allow an accessory building before construction of the primary residence; (3) increase maximum floor area from 1,014 to 1,248 sq. ft.; (4) reduce the street setback from 30 ft. to 22 ft. along Lakeview Drive. The board noted the lot is non-buildable for a residence due to floodplain issues but has been improved, and similar variances have been granted in Lake Dale Karo. All three variances were approved unanimously. Key Outcomes - Item 1: Deferred to October 21, 2026 BZA meeting; no vote taken. - Items 5-7 (Coffman): Approved unanimously (3 separate votes). - Item 8 (Fiedler): Approved unanimously. - Item 9 (Gatto): Approved unanimously. - Item 10 (Emigh): Approved unanimously. - Items 2-4 (Davis/Vis): Approved unanimously (3 separate votes). - The meeting adjourned after all business.
The meeting was called to order at 5:30 PM on Wednesday, September 16, 2026, with all four commissioners present: Rusty Braun, Kenya Cribb, Heather Petrillo, and David Schott. No members of the public addressed the Commission during the open call. The Recreation Manager provided an update on upcoming events and programs. The Commission approved the previous minutes, elected officers for the 2026-2027 fiscal year, reviewed bylaws without action, and discussed a proposal by the Daughters of the American Revolution to preserve the Old Prescott to Mohave Toll Road. Consent Calendar - Approval of the August 19, 2026 Regular Meeting Minutes was moved and seconded, passing unanimously (4-0). Public Comments & Testimony - No citizens spoke during the open call to the public. Discussion Items - Recreation Program and Events Update: Recreation Manager Claire Adams reported on upcoming community events, including Thursday Eats and Treats on September 17th from 5:30 to 8 p.m. at Gary Keith Park, Oktoberfest on September 26th at Community Park, the return of the Bullhead City Farmers Market (haunted market theme) with over 65 vendors, Cornfest preparations with the Kiwanis Club, and a flannel-themed Puppy Play Date on October 2nd. She also noted that recent tournaments drew praise from directors for the quality of the fields. - Election of Chairperson (2026-2027): Commissioner Heather Petrillo was re-elected as Chairperson by a unanimous vote (4-0). - Election of Vice Chairperson (2026-2027): The Commission elected Kenya Cribb to serve as Vice Chairperson for the 2026-2027 fiscal year by a unanimous vote (4-0). - Review of Parks & Recreation Commission Bylaws: The Commission reviewed the bylaws; no revisions were recommended and no action was taken. - Old Prescott to Mohave Toll Road Preservation Plan: Denise Atwater Vallon, Honorary Regent of the Fort Mojave Chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution (DAR), presented a plan to preserve a 100-foot by 300-foot section of the historic wagon road. She explained its significance as the first federally funded road for wagon transportation through Arizona Territory. The DAR (a 501(c)(3)) and the Vallon Family Trust will fund fencing, a stone marker (8.5 to 10 feet tall), informational silhouettes, and possible connections to the adjacent community garden. No city funding is requested. Commissioners expressed strong support, noting the educational and historical value, and emphasized that the site should be preserved without disturbing existing vegetation or archaeological features such as pottery shards. Key Outcomes - The August 19, 2026 meeting minutes were approved unanimously (4-0). - Heather Petrillo was re-elected Chairperson for the 2026-2027 fiscal year (4-0). - Kenya Cribb was elected Vice Chairperson for the 2026-2027 fiscal year (4-0). - The Commission voted to recommend to the City Council approval of the DAR’s plan to redevelop and preserve the Old Prescott to Mohave Toll Road (motion carried 4-0). - The Commission voted to add a discussion item on improving handicap accessibility at Rotary Park to the next regular meeting agenda (motion carried 4-0). The meeting adjourned following the setting of the next agenda.
The Bend City Council and the Bend Urban Renewal Agency (BURA) met on September 16, 2026, starting at 6:00 p.m. The meeting included proclamations, council reports, public testimony, first readings on System Development Charges (SDC) exemptions and sign code amendments, authorization for a property purchase and bond issuance, discussion of 2027 state legislative priorities, and second readings on the Caldera Ranch development and repeal of an Economic Improvement District. The BURA portion covered approval of loan and grant programs, initiation of a conceptual plan for the Bend Central District, an update on Tax Increment Assistance for Housing Affordability (TIAP), and a project update on the Joule development. Consent Calendar - Approved the July 2026 Monthly Financial Report. - Adopted a resolution extending the Houseless Services Grant Program through June 30, 2027, adding funds. Public Comments & Testimony - Michelle Monroe (Bend resident) asked council to remove a sentence from the 2027 legislative priorities supporting "responsible technologies," citing concerns about surveillance expansion, data privacy, and misuse of Flock camera data. - Madison Bordeaux (Bend resident) echoed concerns about the same sentence, arguing it authorizes broad surveillance without specifics or public oversight, and requested a separate council vote before advocating for such technology in Salem. - Dr. Ali Boudreau (Woodside Ranch) opposed the Caldera Ranch development, stating the application is incomplete, the traffic study is obsolete, and the site sits on two former cinder mines. He requested a full geotechnical review before approval. - Jennifer Jones (Woodside Ranch) urged council to abandon the Caldera Ranch plan, citing incomplete application, outdated traffic analysis, fire evacuation risks, and a city error on housing minimums. - Ricardo Waits (Bend resident) criticized the city's equity infrastructure, citing the resignation of the equity director, lack of response to a March letter from BIPOC community organizations, and called for a real meeting on equity. - Jonathan Bim (apparent speaker, name from transcript) opposed expanding surveillance technologies, noted that Axon has not met state audit requirements, and argued that without technical safeguards, the city is building a surveillance network that could be misused. - Garth Finley (North Coast States Carpenters Union) opposed staff direction to avoid triggering prevailing wage on publicly subsidized affordable housing, claiming it perpetuates worker exploitation and wage theft. - Chris McGee (carpenter, North Coast States Carpenters) argued that avoiding prevailing wage undermines worker community and allows labor brokers, asking council to direct staff to prevent exploitation. - Joe Weinmiller (Bend resident, carpenter) supported prevailing wage, stating it allows workers to afford to live where they build, and also opposed expanding surveillance without clear limits. Discussion Items - First Reading of SDC Exemption Ordinance (Item 5) – Staff proposed a five-year, core-area-wide exemption of all city SDCs for non-residential projects. Councilor Méndez moved to amend the duration to three years, arguing it would be easier to pull back if needed. The amendment failed (2 opposed: Councilors Mendez and Riley). The main motion passed (5-2). Council also prioritized three follow-up items: revisiting the SDC credit look-back, reviewing percentage of sales on industrial sites, and creating a shot clock for transportation/water/sewer reviews. - First Reading of Sign Code Ordinance (Item 6) – Council debated whether to allow increased illuminated signs on the parkway. Councilor Méndez expressed concerns about expanding lighted signs, supporting a motion to adopt the package minus the illuminated sign changes (using Alternative Exhibit A). The motion passed (4-3). - Authorize Purchase and Sale Agreement for Conners Property (Item 7) – Staff presented a $17.95 million purchase of two properties on the east side (2965 NE Conners Ave and 1979 NE Tucson Way) to consolidate city administrative offices, reduce costs vs. new construction, and free up downtown land for redevelopment. Council expressed strong support, noting fiscal savings and opportunity for BCD investment. Motion passed unanimously. - Adopt $25M Full Faith and Credit Bond Resolution (Item 8) – To finance the purchase and related improvements. Motion passed unanimously. - Discuss 2027 State Legislative Priorities (Item 9) – Staff presented top three priorities: shelter funding, Deschutes Basin groundwater mitigation, and statewide transportation funding. Council debated the technology bullet ("support expanding allowed uses of responsible technologies that strengthen public safety and service delivery"). After public comment and discussion, council agreed to remove or narrow the language, instead crafting a more specific statement focused on preemption and photo enforcement, with regular updates to council on technology-related bills. Council also asked to strengthen language on no cuts to shelter funding and to consider homeownership opportunities. The LOC ballot priorities were noted. - Second Reading – Caldera Ranch Ordinance (Item 10) – Adopted by unanimous roll call vote, approving the binding conceptual plan and UGB expansion per SB 1537. - Second Reading – Repeal of EID Ordinance (Item 11) – Unanimously adopted. - BURA – Business Development Loan and Property Improvement Grant Programs – Two resolutions adopted unanimously. - BURA – Initiation of Bend Central District Conceptual Plan Process – Approved; Core Area Advisory Board (CAB) to provide guidance. Timeline estimated at 12-18 months. - BURA – TIAP Update – Staff reported on a 2026 BOLI determination that tax rebates trigger prevailing wage, reversing a 2021 determination. Staff recommended front-loading assistance, including parks SDCs, and maintaining the program pause. Council expressed general support for the staff approach, with discussion about appealing the determination and potential legislative action. - BURA – Joule Project Update – Staff reported that the project had been redesigned from 125 to 79 units (100% at or below 80% AMI), with a reduced funding gap. Council directed staff to bring back a resolution for a minor amendment to the Core Area TIF boundary. Key Outcomes - SDC Exemption Ordinance: First reading approved (5-2). Staff to explore follow-up items. - Sign Code Ordinance: First reading approved with Alternative Exhibit A (4-3). - Conners Property Purchase: Authorized city manager to enter into Purchase and Sale Agreement (unanimous). - $25M Bond Resolution: Adopted (unanimous). - Caldera Ranch Ordinance: Adopted (unanimous roll call). - EID Repeal Ordinance: Adopted (unanimous roll call). - BURA Loan and Grant Programs: Resolutions adopted (unanimous). - BURA BCD Conceptual Plan: Process initiated (unanimous). - BURA TIAP Update: Direction given to proceed with staff recommendation; program remains paused. - BURA Joule Project: Staff directed to bring back resolution for minor boundary amendment.
The meeting focused on a code enforcement update from Officer Dan Baxter, discussion of the matching grant communication plan, and future goals for the commission. Key topics included voluntary cleanup programs, vehicle abatement, and outreach strategies for the beautification matching grant. Consent Calendar - Approved the minutes of the October 27th meeting with a unanimous voice vote. Discussion Items - Code Enforcement Update (Officer Baxter): Baxter presented his role enforcing Title 8.2 (nuisance code). He reported 14 active cases this year, 9 voluntary compliance agreements, 2 notice-and-order cases (one with a repeat citation), and 1 forced abatement contract signed. The city provides a 15-yard construction dumpster for voluntary cleanups; a second dumpster is expected next spring. Statistics: 1,698 cubic yards of debris hauled this year (including 25 yards of hazardous waste diverted), and over 100 vehicles removed annually through the vehicle abatement program (costs: $650-$750 per vehicle for removal). Forced abatement can lead to tax liens and foreclosure. Baxter emphasized the program's goal is to help property owners clean up, not to punish, and he typically works off complaints. Commissioners discussed volunteer opportunities (e.g., with Coast Guard) and the need for equitable enforcement. - Matching Grant Communication Plan: The commission reviewed a proposed outreach timeline (through March 9th) including news flashes, Facebook posts, postcard mailers to 114 business owners, luncheons, and radio spots (KVAK). Commissioners requested cost estimates for each strategy (e.g., $150/week for a KVAK media blitz) and wanted to maximize budget ($2,000). Anna will coordinate with Lori for KVAK advertising. There was consensus to use all available channels to reach applicants and promote the grant. - Future Goals and Priorities: Chair discussed the commission's role as ambassadors and advocates. Priorities include: creating a communication plan similar to the grant plan for code enforcement education (e.g., promoting the orange dumpster program without promising free service); engaging with the Title 17 rewrite (zoning, Conex structures) and attending planning commission meetings; obtaining an update on wayfinding and trail signage (new signs for Old Town walking tour coming next summer); and potentially tackling the town square project. Commissioners expressed interest in inviting Kate to discuss the Title 17 rewrite at a future meeting. Key Outcomes - Code Enforcement: No formal decisions; commissioners thanked Baxter and suggested follow-up on volunteer coordination and before/after photo usage (cautioned due to privacy). - Matching Grant: Anna will produce a detailed budget breakdown (postage, radio, luncheon costs) and coordinate with Lori for KVAK advertising. Outreach will proceed with news flash, Facebook, emails to business owners, and postcard mailers. - Future Agenda: Commission agreed to invite Kate to a future meeting to discuss Title 17 rewrite. No formal vote taken. - Adjournment: Motion made and seconded to adjourn.
The Appleton Common Council met on Wednesday, September 16, 2026, at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers. Mayor Jake Woodford presided. Fifteen alderpersons were present; Alderperson Patti Heffernan was absent. The meeting lasted 15 minutes, adjourning at 7:15 PM. All votes on the agenda were approved with varying levels of support, and no public comments were made. Consent Calendar - Approval of Previous Meeting Minutes (September 2, 2026): Approved 14-0 (Mayor abstained). - Board of Zoning Appeals Appointment (26-1189): Approved 14-0 (Mayor abstained). - McFleshman's Full Service Retail Outlet Transfer Application for Lagerfest (26-1199): Approved 13-0-2 (Mayor Woodford and Alderperson Alex Schultz abstained). - Fox Cities Performing Arts Center Temporary Premises Amendment (26-1020): Approved 12-0-3 (Mayor Woodford, Alderperson Vaya Jones, and Alderperson Josh Lambrecht abstained). - Counter-Offer to Purchase from F Street Appleton 6, LLC (26-1154): Approved 14-0-1 (Mayor abstained) for Lot 2 at the southwest corner of E. Vantage Drive and S. Eisenhower Drive in Southpoint Commerce Park at a purchase price of $611,890 ($43,000/acre). - Balance of the Agenda (including committee report items such as license changes, operator's license denial, Fire Department agreements, fire code amendments, and Urban Forestry Storm Grant): Approved unanimously (14-0, Mayor abstained). Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public signed up to speak, and no one indicated a desire to address the council on any agenda item. Discussion Items - Land Purchase Concerns: Alderperson Sheri Hartzheim expressed concern that the city had not yet approved a resolution regarding AI data centers before proceeding with the sale to F Street Appleton 6, LLC. She described the approach as "putting the cart before the horse" but stated she would vote in favor and encouraged colleagues to do so. Key Outcomes - All six voting items passed with no opposition, though several alderpersons and the mayor abstained on certain votes. - Proclamations were issued for Constitution Week (September 17–23), Think Train Week, Childhood Cancer Awareness Month, Senior Center Month, Hispanic Heritage Month, and Recovery Month. - No closed session was held, despite being listed on the agenda. - Resolutions submitted by alderpersons (26-1226 on vehicle noise penalties, 26-1227 on increasing noise penalties, and 26-1228 on private school voucher transparency) were referred to committees of jurisdiction. The rules governing dogs in taverns (Resolution 12-R-26) were noted as approved by the Board of Health on September 9, 2026.
The City Council held a special meeting on September 16, 2026, at 6:30 PM in the City Hall Council Chambers to address Ethics Complaint EC2026-01 and related personnel matters concerning Council Member Place 4 (Matt Blake). The meeting began with a prayer led by Council Member Roberts. Three members of the public provided comments before the Council entered a nearly three-hour executive session. Following the closed session, the Council reconvened and approved a statement condemning the referenced statements in the complaint and directing Council Member Blake to remove them from his social media. Public Comments & Testimony - Karran Martin (5614 Westchase Drive) expressed disappointment over Council Member Blake's recent conduct, describing his online comments as arrogant, rude, and condescending. She urged him to take responsibility and learn from the situation, noting she had supported him in previous campaigns. - Bill Finstad (7701 Terry Drive) echoed concerns about the conduct and broader patterns of influence and manipulation within the Council, citing resident complaints about ongoing drama. - Shelly Hollon (6309 Green Castle Court) stated that elected officials should be held to a high ethical standard, similar to volunteers, and argued that public conduct matters for those representing the city. Executive Session The Council entered executive session at 6:42 PM and concluded at 9:11 PM. The session was held under Texas Government Code Sections 551.071 (consultation with the city attorney on pending or contemplated litigation) and 551.074 (personnel matters – discussion of a public officer or hearing a complaint against an officer) to discuss Ethics Complaint EC2026-01 and the conduct of Council Member Place 4. Action Following Executive Session Upon reconvening at 9:14 PM, a motion was made by Council Member Delaney and seconded by Council Member Parks to issue a statement as discussed in executive session. Council Member Goetz read the following statement: "The Code of Ethics as drafted is not the appropriate vehicle to address the conduct referred to in the complaint regarding Council Member 4. We as a group condemn, in the strongest of terms, the referenced statements in the complaint. Council Member Blake will remove referenced statements from his social media. This is the response to our complaint." Key Outcomes - The motion to approve the statement passed 5-0 (Council Members Delaney, Goetz, Roberts, Parks, Mitchell in favor; Council Member Blake abstained). - Council Member Blake agreed to remove the challenged statements from his social media. - The meeting adjourned at 9:15 PM.