The Public Meeting Index

The Clarksville Town Council held a public hearing on the proposed fiscal year 2027 budget and then its regular meeting on September 15, 2026. Clerk-Treasurer A.D. Stonecypher presented the budget, and no members of the public spoke during the hearing or signed up for public comment for the regular meeting. The council also took up the Maine and Clark bond ordinance, a rental inspection program amendment, a South Clarksville TIF allocation-area expansion, and a new non-reverting building fund. Consent Calendar - The consent agenda covered items 5.1 through 5.3: minutes of the joint town council regular meeting, work session, and executive session; town claims, current and prewritten; wastewater sewer claims; wastewater sewage bond, grant, and payroll items. Public Comments & Testimony - No resident or audience member spoke during the FY 2027 budget public hearing, and the hearing was closed. - No one signed up for public comment for the regular meeting. Discussion Items FY 2027 Budget Public Hearing - Stonecypher said the notice to taxpayers was published on budgetnotices.in.gov on September 4, 2026, at 8:36 a.m., exceeding the required 10-day notice. - The proposed general fund (Fund 101) budget for 2027 is $21,632,939, with $11.2 million sought through the tax levy; this was described as the largest year-over-year increase, intended to address the town's operating deficit. - Total 2027 spending estimates across all statutory funds are $56,568,969, with a proposed levy described as 50 percent, or $28,267,310. - Year-over-year spending would increase by 8.42 percent, while the consumer price index is stated to be around 3.5 percent. - The budget was described as balanced but reliant on savings from the current year and reserves; Stonecypher encouraged the council to find additional savings for 2028 and beyond. - After the hearing, 10 or more taxpayers may file an objection petition with the Clerk-Treasurer's office within seven days. Consent Agenda and Regular Meeting Items - The council heard about Ordinance 2026 B01, the Maine and Clark project bond ordinance. The ordinance authorizes bonds not to exceed $4.6 million, maturing no later than 25 years; the project ask is $3.8 million, with the additional amount covering bond issuance fees. - On Ordinance 2026 G-16, amending the rental inspection program, a council member said the program did not appear to be paying dividends for the town and required more code-enforcement work than value received. The second reading was before the council; the transcript does not show a vote outcome. - Resolution 2026 R-15 amended South Clarksville allocation area number one. Discussion noted the expansion would support the Maine and Clark development, infrastructure improvements, and future connections such as Colgate to another TIF district if needed. The council approved the resolution by a raised-hand vote. - Ordinance 2026 G-17 creates a new non-reverting fund for building and construction related items, required by Indiana House Enrolled Act 1001 to be in place by January 1, 2027. The fund must be maintained as a separate line item and may not revert to the general fund or any other fund. The council changed the effective date to October 1, 2026, and approved the ordinance by voice/raised-hand vote. - An additional new-business item, 7.3, was set aside after discussion with the town manager was needed. Clerk-Treasurer Report on Local Income Tax Discussions - Stonecypher reported on the morning's MUST committee meeting with Clark County Councilman Linford, school districts, and Mayor Trava Hodges. - Discussion included a possible countywide 1.5 percent local income tax rate, described as making the town whole in essence but not fully given new homestead credits. Under one scenario, if the county adopted a 0.89 percent rate and municipalities set their own rates, the county would gain an additional $6 million to rebate. - Stonecypher noted that, because of the 1 percent constitutional circuit-breaker tax cap, most homeowners would not pay more than 1 percent of assessed value in property taxes. - The next meeting is set for Monday, September 28, 2026, most likely at 10 a.m. Police Chief, Permits, and Council Comments - The police chief thanked circuit court judges for visiting the station and recognized officers for a response on Sunday, including life-saving measures and follow-up search warrants. - A council member asked about constituent permit concerns. Glenn responded that some permits had been cleaned up, but contracted support was not available that week because of other commitments. - Council members discussed scheduling interviews for a permanent building commission and thanked developers, public safety personnel, and the Hanes family for the use of a facility. - The council promoted an October 17 community event, asking residents to bring chairs and family. Key Outcomes - The FY 2027 budget public hearing was closed without public testimony; an objection petition may be filed with the Clerk-Treasurer by taxpayers within seven days after the hearing. - Resolution 2026 R-15 expanding South Clarksville allocation area number one was approved. - Ordinance 2026 G-17 establishing the non-reverting building and construction fund was approved, effective October 1, 2026. - The council scheduled an executive session for Tuesday, September 22, 2026, on town management recruitment. - The next MUST committee meeting is Monday, September 28, 2026, likely at 10 a.m. - The transcript does not explicitly record the outcome of votes on the Maine and Clark bond ordinance or Ordinance 2026 G-16; no meeting minutes were provided to confirm those results.

The Chesapeake City Council met on September 15, 2026 at 6:30 p.m. in City Hall Council Chamber, 306 Cedar Road. The meeting included an invocation by Council Member King, the Pledge of Allegiance led by St. Thomas Episcopal Church Boy Scout Troop 71, roll call (all members present), and approval of the proposed agenda without objection. A special recognition was held for the Planning Department, which received two statewide honors from the American Planning Association: the Jamestown Locality of the Year Award (Virginia’s top award) and the Moser Award for Distinguished New Professional for Planning Administrator Kevin Finn. The department invested over $3 million in community‑driven planning, adopted eight major planning documents, engaged with thousands of residents through more than 100 community meetings, and collected over 10,000 survey responses. Public Comments & Testimony - Townes at Rivercrest (PLN‑REZ‑2026‑001): Five speakers addressed the item. Thomas Ty, Russell Ty, and Melissa Venable (representing the applicant) spoke in favor, highlighting the project’s 26 townhouse units, local builder involvement, community outreach, and compliance with the comprehensive plan. Ozanne Duran and Marquis Lamore spoke in opposition. Duran raised concerns about tree canopy loss, lack of public transportation integration, and increased traffic. Lamore noted that the property is within the Transportation Corridor Overlay District (TCOD) but does not meet TCOD requirements, though an exception could be justified by the limited buildable area; he requested the planning department formally include the TCOD question on future applications. - Kings Tobacco & Hookah Lounge (PLN‑SPEX‑2025‑001 & PLN‑USE‑2024‑001): Four speakers testified in opposition. Dale Bennett (resident of 917 Willis St.) described safety fears, parking overflow, and stress from the lounge’s operations. George Reich (Willis St. resident) asked the council not to expand late‑night operations, citing multiple shooting‑related incidents, a fatal shooting, and a pattern of disturbances (arguments, urination, sexual activity, blocked emergency access). Desiree Chanel (928 Willis St.) recounted gunshots, a homicide, her children’s fear, and that nine days after the Planning Commission hearing, the owner’s attorney had not contacted residents. Ozanne Duran urged a decisive denial, noting the business’s ongoing violations. Discussion Items - PLN‑TXT‑2025‑010 – Civil Enforcement: The council considered an ordinance changing criminal zoning enforcement to civil enforcement. Council Member Newens explained it would expedite citizen complaints and move away from unsuccessful criminal prosecutions. The manager noted the change aligns with the city’s CARES philosophy and that a written policy would be codified later. Approved 9‑0. - PLN‑REZ‑2026‑001 – Townes at Rivercrest: The conditional rezoning for a 26‑unit townhome project on 5.49 acres was debated. Vice Mayor Ritter asked about access (off Great Bridge Blvd. via existing road), right‑of‑way dedication (at no cost to the city), and sidewalk placement. Planning staff confirmed the development provides an appropriate transition between commercial corridors and residential neighborhoods and meets Smart Growth principles. The project will include a walking trail and amenity space; existing trees will be cleared and replaced. Approved 8‑1 (Council Member Whitaker voted no). - PLN‑SPEX‑2025‑001 & PLN‑USE‑2024‑001 – Kings Tobacco & Hookah Lounge: The agent requested a continuance from November 17, 2026. Police Captain Noel reported a 1,242% increase in calls for service (10 calls in 2023 to 255 in 2025, and already 358 year‑to‑date in 2026). He described violent crimes, a homicide, blocked streets, and that the business continued serving alcohol after midnight despite violations. Council Member Jeffries recused himself due to prior familiarity with the property, stating he would abstain. Council Member Newens made a substitute motion to deny both items based on the staff report. After extensive debate, the original continuance motion failed on a tie (4‑4). A substitute motion to continue with immediate cessation of after‑midnight alcohol sales also failed on a tie. Finally, the primary motion to deny was adopted 6‑2 (Council Members Smith and Whitaker voted no; Council Member Jeffries abstained). The council directed the city attorney and staff to enforce the denial, noting that a 60‑day appeal period follows but that enforcement actions (notices of violation, potential injunctions) can begin immediately. Key Outcomes - PLN‑TXT‑2025‑010 (Civil Enforcement): Approved 9‑0 (motion by Ritter, second by Ward). - PLN‑REZ‑2026‑001 (Townes at Rivercrest): Approved with proffers 8‑1 (motion by Bunn, second by Newens; Whitaker opposed). - PLN‑SPEX‑2025‑001 & PLN‑USE‑2024‑001 (Kings Tobacco & Hookah Lounge): Denied 6‑2 (motion by King, second by Newens; Smith and Whitaker voted no; Jeffries abstained). The business must immediately stop selling or permitting alcohol consumption after midnight pending any appeal. - Closed Meeting: Approved 9‑0 for September 22, 2026 at 4:30 p.m. to discuss appointments to city boards and commissions. - Other: Council Member Bunn requested staff to develop a policy capping continuances on land‑use applications and requiring continuance requests at least two weeks prior to public hearings. Council Member Jeffries asked for an update on the Portsmouth Boulevard gateway streetscape project.

The Education Committee of the Indianapolis-Marion County City-County Council met on Tuesday, September 15, 2026, at 5:30 p.m. in the Public Assembly Room to consider the proposed Fiscal Year 2027 budget for the Office of Education Innovation (OEI). The meeting also featured updates on the Circle City Readers tutoring program and the Indy Achieves postsecondary success program. No votes were taken; the committee requested a corrected budget presentation and discussed oversight, program impact, and future funding. Discussion Items OEI Budget Presentation - Director Shana Cavazos presented OEI's FY2027 budget. OEI oversees 50 mayor-sponsored charter schools serving over 18,000 students. The budget is funded primarily by a 1% charter authorizer fee (statutory cap is 3%) assessed after a school's third year. The 2027 proposed budget totals $2,895,492 across all funds, a decrease of $848,108 from the 2026 revised budget (which was $3,743,600 – $4,620,409 depending on appropriations for Circle City Readers and other programs). The reduction is due to moving Circle City Readers funding to a separate fiscal ordinance ($400,000) and a reduction in Indy Achieves general fund support ($1.5 million, down from $2 million). - Councilor Dan Boots asked clarifying questions about the appointment of the Indianapolis Charter School Board (6 by mayor, 3 by council), the scope of school site visits (conducted by independent evaluators contracted by schools at a cost of roughly $10,000–$15,000), and the diversity goal for charter school boards (currently 52% members of color, goal 55% in 2027). Director Cavazos explained that the goal is appropriate given that about 75% of students are students of color. - Councilor Jessica McCormick noted a discrepancy between the presentation's total budget figure ($4,620,409 for 2026) and the Hyperion report. Director Cavazos acknowledged a possible error and agreed to provide a corrected PowerPoint including spring fiscal allocations. - Councilor Michael-Paul Hart inquired about Irvington Community Schools, a mayor-sponsored charter facing a significant budget deficit. Director Cavazos confirmed OEI monitors deficits quarterly and that Irvington is up for renewal. She stated OEI does not run schools but supports their boards in financial decisions. Councilor Hart expressed concern that OEI’s oversight may not have prevented the deficit. - Councilor Jesse Brown questioned the incentive structure for opening new charter schools, suggesting the low fee encourages proliferation. He asked how many schools OEI has closed (one in 2025) and how many are on improvement plans (four or five). He also pressed on why OEI doesn't charge the full 3% fee to generate more resources for oversight. Director Cavazos replied that OEI's fee is set to sustain its operations, not to fund schools, and that the office's staff of seven is adequate. - Councilor Keith Graves asked about collaboration with the Indianapolis Public Education Corporation (IPEC). Director Cavazos said OEI participated in discussions about common accountability frameworks. - Councilor Perkins requested a clean budget be sent to the committee after the meeting. Circle City Readers Update - Holly Morgan, OEI Deputy Director, presented results from the high-dosage tutoring program for K-3 students. In 2025–26, the program served over 500 students across 10 schools (including mayor-sponsored charters and IPS innovation schools) with over 13,500 tutoring sessions. Students performing “well below” benchmark on DIBELS improved by 20 percentage points—three times the national average. At one partner school, CCR students increased the share at benchmark by 25 points vs. 8 points for non-CCR peers. The program employs 39 tutors, 35% new, 65% returning, and has a diverse age range from 18 to 80. - Councilor Boots asked if schools would fund CCR themselves going forward. Morgan said they are open to discussions with schools and philanthropic partners, but no commitments have been made. Councilor McCormick noted spring semester funding was provided in the fiscal ordinance and advocated for continued support. Indy Achieves Presentation - Ken Clark, President & CEO of EmployIndy, presented the Indy Achieves program, which provides Promise Scholarships and Completion Grants for Marion County residents attending IU Indianapolis. Since 2019, the program has awarded 10,255 scholarships and 1,476 completion grants, producing 793 and 835 graduates respectively. Indy Achieves students have a 12% higher retention rate than peers. The FY2027 budget request is $1.5 million ($1.35M for direct student support, $150K for administration), down from $2 million in FY2026 because Ivy Tech has adopted a similar model (Ivy Achieves), reducing need for coaching there. Clark noted that about 80% of IU Indianapolis graduates from Marion County stay in the county, offering a strong return on investment. - Councilor Hart asked about tracking graduates’ residency. Clark said they rely on university data indicating most remain in Marion County. Councilor Graves questioned how completion grants reach students who have stopped out; Clark said the university partners to identify eligible students. - Councilor Brown asked about the gap between Indy Achieves and Ivy Achieves. Clark explained he would like to resume providing completion grants at Ivy Tech, but leadership turnover has stalled an agreement. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken. - The committee requested that OEI provide a corrected, clean version of the budget presentation including all spring fiscal allocations. - Discussions indicated continued council support for Circle City Readers (spring funded) and Indy Achieves, but with scrutiny on oversight and program sustainability. - The chair (Councilor Perkins) made a closing remark about the need to address universal pre-K as a root cause for early literacy gaps.

The City of Mesquite held a Technical Review Meeting on Tuesday, September 15, 2026, at 2:30 PM in Council Chambers. The meeting began with public comment and then moved to a work session where the council added an item for an independent police department review and corrected an agenda item designation. No other substantive business was conducted. Public Comments & Testimony - Rick McIntyre addressed the council, commending Travis Anderson for handling a required community meeting for the new Smiths project at Birdie Lane and Bertha Howe Avenue. He noted the meeting drew about 60 people and was a potentially contentious crowd, but Mr. Anderson managed it well. Discussion Items - Addition of Agenda Item: Councilwoman Filden moved to add consideration of appointing CPSM or the 65th North Group to perform an independent review of the City of Mesquite Police Department. The motion was seconded by Councilman Ennis and passed by voice vote. (Councilman Wanless and Councilman Parrish were excused.) - Revision to Item 6.1: Travis Anderson requested a correction to agenda item 6.1 (Bill as Ordinance No. B26-007 regarding vacation home rentals), changing the designation from "Public Comment" to "Public Hearing" to match the published notice. The council acknowledged the revision. Key Outcomes - Motion Approved: The council approved adding the police department independent review item to the agenda. No tally was recorded; the motion passed by voice vote. - Agenda Correction: Item 6.1 was revised to a public hearing. No further action was taken on the consent agenda or other listed items. Note: The consent agenda (items 2.1–2.4) and other scheduled items were not discussed or voted upon during the meeting.

The Rochester Sustainability and Resiliency Commission met on September 15, 2026, at 4:30 p.m. in City Hall Room 104 and via Zoom. The meeting focused on Rochester Public Utilities' (RPU) power supply resource plan, updates on utility programs, and new sustainability pilot programs. No public comments were received. The meeting adjourned at 6:01 p.m. Consent Calendar - Approval of August Meeting Minutes: The minutes from the August 12, 2026 meeting were approved unanimously on a motion by Amanda Holloway, seconded by Seth Behrends. All present members voted in favor; Amy C. Caucutt and Stewart Rassier were absent. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public spoke during the open comment period. Discussion Items RPU Power Supply Resource Plan (50 minutes) - Tim McCullough, RPU General Manager, presented the utility's power supply plan, emphasizing the dual challenge of meeting 100% net renewable energy by 2030 while maintaining reliable capacity. He described the plan as a "snakes and ladders" game, with recent setbacks and some wins. - Renewable Energy Progress: RPU has secured about two-thirds of its renewable electricity needs through contracts, primarily wind and solar. A key wind project in northeast Iowa (Howard County) is shovel-ready but stalled due to federal inaction on airspace clearance—the Department of Defense has not issued a determination of no harm for any project in over a year. RPU is advocating for legislative action through the National Defense Authorization Act. - Reliable Capacity Needs: RPU's contract with Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency (200 MW of coal capacity) expires in Q1 2030. To replace it, RPU is building Mount Simon Station, a 50 MW natural gas peaking plant adjacent to the West Side Energy Station. The plant will have dual fuel capability (gas/oil) and is on schedule for Q3 2029 operation. A 20 MW battery storage project (two 10 MW sites, 4-hour duration) has been leased; it is expected to break even in the first year with about $3 million in lease costs and $3 million projected revenue. - Challenges: Inflation, tariffs, and permitting delays have increased costs. The cost of combustion turbines has more than doubled in six months due to data center demand. Natural gas price volatility and winter fuel scarcity (e.g., Winter Storm Fern in January 2026) require oil backup. MISO capacity accreditation for wind and batteries is diminishing; longer-duration batteries (8+ hours) may be needed. - Solar on Public Buildings: RPU applied for 20 state grants and was awarded all 20 for solar arrays (40 kW each) on city buildings, totaling 700 kW. These arrays benefit from a 70% state tax credit and potential 30% federal credit. - Commission Q&A: Commissioners asked about dispatch ordering, nuclear energy, hydrogen, and geothermal. Tim McCullough noted that renewables are dispatched first economically; nuclear may be necessary as a zero-carbon dispatchable source but is expensive and faces regulatory hurdles. RPU's new combustion turbines are tested for up to 30% hydrogen blend. RPU Utility Programs and Sustainability Pilot Programs (30 minutes) - Josh (Manager of Marketing and Energy Services) presented RPU's energy efficiency programs. The team of nine manages over 50 cost-effective programs. Highlights: - RPU has met its state-mandated annual energy savings goal (1.5% of annual energy sales) for 20 consecutive years, saving over 17 million kWh annually. In 2025, RPU paid $2.1 million in rebates to nearly 4,000 customers. - Electrification (Efficient Fuel Switching): Since the ECO Act allowed incentives in 2021, electrification has grown. However, state law caps savings from fuel switching at 40% of total; RPU is approaching that cap and will advocate to raise it in the next legislative cycle. - Low-Income Programs: RPU spends $120,000 annually on dedicated programs, including free energy audits and the Neighborhood Energy Challenge. The Older Adults program (rebranded from seniors) had only seven participants last year—outreach challenges exist. - Solar Interconnections: Over 800 systems interconnected as of 2026, but residential tax credits expired end of 2025; 2026 interconnection pace is significantly lower. - Electric Vehicles: 1,875 EVs in service territory in 2025 (27% increase over 2024). Time-of-use rates encourage nighttime charging, but customer adoption is slow. Advanced meters will help customers see savings. - Demand Response: Total capacity 7 MW, mostly from thermostat programs (BYU), with modest growth. - Kayla (Sustainability Staff) gave an update on the three sustainability pilot programs approved by City Council (August 17, 2026): - Allocation: $75,000 for residential rebates, $25,000 for building community grants. - Residential Rebate Programs: Plug-in solar (rebate $100–$300, 75–225 projects; launch mid-2027 due to code/equipment certification hurdles), battery storage ($2,000/project; stackable with state incentives), electric panel upgrade add-on ($2,000 for customers with existing electrification projects), air sealing/insulation (modeled after MERC program; launch early 2027). - Building Community Grant: Expands existing DEI grant to include environmental sustainability projects; open to community groups, neighborhood associations, etc. Early 2027 launch. - Evaluation: Success measured by participation, energy savings, GHG reductions, cost-effectiveness, and customer experience. Staff will report back to council in about a year. - Commission asked about preferred vendors—RPU is tightening contractor lists for solar to avoid fly-by-night operators. Staff Updates - Kayla announced: Brittany Rhodes (Healthy Home Navigator) will serve as the new GreenCorps member starting late September for an 11-month term. Commissioners interested in mentoring can fill out a form. - The youth member (Liam) is stepping down due to college attendance; a new youth member is being sought. Staff is confirming appointment process and term limits. - A mayor's Healthy and Stable Community Support application was submitted to continue funding Healthy Home Helpers next year. - Upcoming events: Week Without Driving Pledge (Oct 1–7), Bike for Science (Sept 24), Move to the Market farmers markets, Snow Summit (Oct 24). Key Outcomes - Approved: August meeting minutes unanimously. - No Votes: No action was taken on the RPU power supply plan or pilot programs; they were presented for information and discussion. - Next Steps: Staff will continue developing the pilot programs for launch in early to mid-2027, with further updates to the commission. Staff will also bring an update on the water supply plan and the legislative agenda (including the ECO Act cap) to a future meeting. - Adjournment: Moved by Casey McQuade, seconded by Brian M. Morgan; approved unanimously at 6:01 p.m.

The San Francisco Port Commission held a regular meeting on September 15, 2026, at 10:30 AM. Commissioners unanimously approved the minutes from August 11, 2026, and adopted resolutions to amend a sole-source grant to the Fisherman’s Wharf Community Benefits District (CBD) and to recommend formation of a Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Pier 70 Historic Core. The commission also received informational presentations on the Executive Director’s report, the Embarcadero Plaza and Sue Bierman Park redesign, and discussed new business items including a blue economy initiative update and a future drone policy. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes – August 11, 2026: The commission unanimously adopted the minutes from the August 11, 2026, Port Commission meeting. Public Comments & Testimony - Executive Director’s Report: Several port staff and community partners offered public comments honoring former commissioners Gail Gilman and Stephen Lee for their service. Speakers included Brad Benson (Waterfront Resilience Program), Dominic Wren (Acting Maritime Director), Amy Cohn (Real Estate Division), Brie (Fisherman’s Wharf Community Benefits District), Stelpne (Government Affairs Manager), Alice Rogers (South Beach/Rincon/Mission Bay Neighborhood Association), and David Beaupre (Deputy Director of Planning and Environment). They thanked the former commissioners for their commitment to equity, small businesses, the fishing community, and inclusive waterfront stewardship. - No public comments were made on items 10A, 10B, or 11A. Discussion Items Executive Director’s Report (Item 9A) Executive Director Michael Martin provided a comprehensive report covering multiple topics: - Hispanic Heritage Month: He acknowledged National Hispanic Heritage Month (Sept 15 – Oct 15) and announced a celebration at Ferry Plaza on October 3, 2026, featuring Latino and Latina vendors, and the visit of the Mexican tall ship ARM Cuauhtémoc at Pier 15 from Sept 23–27. - Coastal Cleanup Day: The port will participate in the 42nd annual California Coastal Cleanup Day on Sept 19, 2026, with events at Pier 94 Wetlands (with Golden Gate Bird Alliance) and Islais Creek Park (with Kayaks Unlimited). - Fisherman’s Wharf Progress: The opening of Alioto’s Plaza was celebrated with Mayor Lurie. The plaza is a key part of Fisherman’s Wharf Forward, which also includes resilient infrastructure planning for Taylor Street and the inner lagoon through 2100. A second community meeting drew about 60 participants. - Waterfront Walkabout: A new monthly evening stroll series, “Waterfront Walkabout,” launches Sept 17, 2026, activating the Big Art Loop sculptures along the Embarcadero from Pier 14 to Pier 15. - Pokémon World Championships: The event (Aug 28–30, 2026) brought an estimated 54,000 people to San Francisco, with over two-thirds international visitors. The port hosted drone shows each night, drawing crowds of 7,000 to 20,000. The success prompted plans for a special event activation strategy update and a drone policy later this fall. - Fleet Week 2026: Scheduled for Oct 4–12, 2026, with major events on port property including air shows, Fleet Fest, ship tours, and equipment tours. - Recognition of Former Commissioners: The commission publicly thanked former commissioners Gail Gilman (8 years of service) and Stephen Lee (4 years) for their leadership, advocacy, and dedication. Both offered brief remarks. Commissioner comments following the report expressed enthusiasm for Alioto’s Plaza, the drone show potential, the blue economy initiative, and the monthly walkabouts. Commissioner Adams inquired about the status of the “blue-green waterway” initiative; Director Martin noted 14 applications for leasing incentives and promised an update in the fall. Fisherman’s Wharf Community Benefits District Grant Amendment (Item 10A) The commission considered a resolution (2645) to increase the port’s sole-source grant to the Fisherman’s Wharf Community Benefits District (CBD) by $1,953,902 and extend the term by 12 months, bringing the total grant to $8,322,138 over 4.5 years. The grant funds ambassador services, beautification, marketing, and events. Scott Lansettle (Deputy Director, Real Estate) and Amy Cohn (Real Estate) presented, noting: - Foot traffic in June 2026 increased 9% over June 2025. - The port is exploring joining the CBD as a property-owning member in 2028, with the current grant serving as a bridge. - Commissioners discussed the return on investment, including a 9% footfall increase translating to an estimated 1.2 million additional visitors annually. They emphasized the need to better communicate the economic benefits. The resolution was adopted unanimously. Pier 70 Historic Core Community Facilities District (Item 10B) Wyatt Donnelly-Landolt (Assistant Deputy Director of Development) and James Mattson (Orton Development, Inc.) presented two resolutions (2646 and 2647) to recommend formation of a Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Pier 70 Historic Core and to amend the master lease to facilitate a restructured services-only CFD. The revised structure eliminates the original facilities tax (approx. $2.73/sq ft) and adopts a single services tax ($0.80/sq ft) to fund ongoing maintenance at Crane Cove Park and other public spaces. The change reduces the overall tax burden on tenants while addressing a budget shortfall for Crane Cove Park. The CFD will raise funds through a special tax on the leasehold, with the port as the sole voter. The process requires Board of Supervisors approval over about six months. Commissioners expressed support, noting the project’s success in rehabilitating eight former shipyard buildings (338,000 sq ft of PDR, office, and retail) and its financial outperformance relative to 2014 projections. Both resolutions were adopted unanimously. Embarcadero Plaza and Sue Bierman Park Redesign (Item 11A) Nico Wright (Port Planning) and Joana Goodwin (Recreation and Parks Department) presented the concept design for the renovation of Embarcadero Plaza and Sue Bierman Park, a 5-acre public space at the waterfront gateway. Key elements include: - A unified park with a large multi-use lawn, performance area, expanded playground, fitness zone, dog play area, picnic area, and improved accessibility. - Community outreach over a year (three meetings) identified priorities: more green space, better accessibility, improved seating and lighting, flexible gathering spaces, and historical recognition. - The design improves circulation between downtown and the waterfront, with stormwater gardens along the Embarcadero edge to address sea level rise. - Construction began with tree removals in Sept 2026; major work starts Dec 2026, with completion expected within a year (late 2027). - A Memorandum of Understanding between the Port and Recreation and Parks for management of port lands within the parks is under development and will come before the commission for approval by end of 2026. - The project is a public-private partnership including RPD, OEWD, Downtown SF Development Corporation (DDC), BXP, and Downtown SF Partnership. Commissioners praised the design and noted the importance of activation and nighttime use. Key Outcomes - Minutes of August 11, 2026 approved unanimously. - Resolution 2645 (Fisherman’s Wharf CBD grant amendment) adopted unanimously. - Resolutions 2646 and 2647 (Pier 70 Historic Core CFD formation and lease amendments) adopted unanimously, with an amendment to add a Board of Supervisors file number to Resolution 2647. - New Business: Commissioners added items for a blue economy initiative update, a drone policy, and an activation strategy to be reported at future meetings. The next regular meeting is scheduled for October 20, 2026 at 10:30 AM. - The meeting adjourned at 5:37 PM.

The New Albany City Plan Commission met on Tuesday, September 15, 2026, at 10:30 AM to consider a variance and subdivision for a duplex townhome project, a subdivision for a mixed-use development, a special exception for an accessory structure, a one-year extension for a planned unit development, and approval of August meeting minutes. Eight members were present; a quorum of six was required. All items were approved or forwarded as recommended by staff, with some conditions. Public Comments & Testimony - One audience member spoke in opposition to the Robert Wesley variance and subdivision at 1020 Clark Street, citing concerns about inadequate parking in the neighborhood, potential spillover parking from a nearby business, and the lack of on-street parking. The speaker also argued that the proposed parking spaces at the rear of the lot were already used by tenants of an adjacent apartment building, though this was disputed by the applicant and staff. Discussion Items - Docket F-6-26 (Variance) and Docket C-1026 (Subdivision) – Robert Wesley / JLM Engineering: The applicant requested a variance to reduce the minimum lot area from 4,200 to 3,500 square feet and lot width from 35 to 25 feet for two proposed lots at 1020 Clark Street, along with primary and secondary plat approval for a two-lot subdivision. The site, vacant for at least 16 years, would be developed with two attached two-story, three-bedroom townhomes (each 1,200 sq. ft.). Parking would be provided at the rear via an alley. Staff recommended approval, finding the variance met all three statutory criteria, noting the site's unusual development context (adjacent to high school, commercial, and industrial uses) and alignment with comprehensive plan goals for compact infill housing. A commission member questioned the driveway and parking layout; the applicant clarified the parking area would be at the rear. The variance was approved unanimously by voice vote, and the subdivision was approved with staff stipulations (secondary plat subject to completed application and fee, drainage approval by city engineer, sewer approval by sewer board, and staff approval of final elevations) also by voice vote. - Docket C-1126 (Subdivision) – Chad Springer / The Springs Company: The applicant requested primary and secondary plat approval for a three-lot subdivision at 300 Couples Avenue, part of a larger mixed-use project (Phase 2). The subdivision would separate two existing buildings and a parking lot to meet lender requirements for Phase 1. The overall project includes new construction apartments and historic rehabilitation with tax credits. Staff recommended approval with a 30-day moratorium before plat recording. A commission member abstained due to a conflict of interest. The motion to approve with staff recommendation passed by voice vote with one abstention. - Docket B-2426 (Special Exception and Variance) – Dustin What's (Southern Indiana Properties) for Jane Schein: The applicant requested a special exception to permit a 40-by-50-foot accessory structure (detached garage) without a principal dwelling in the Steep Slope District at 3204 Chapel Lane. The structure would be used for personal storage of vehicles and groundskeeping equipment. Staff noted the steep slope zone covers the parcel, but the proposed garage would sit entirely outside the areas with a 12% or greater grade change. Staff recommended the Plan Commission forward a favorable recommendation to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) with a condition restricting future commercial use without additional approval. A commission member raised a concern about potential future commercial activity; staff confirmed a use restriction could be added. The motion to forward with a favorable recommendation subject to that condition passed by voice vote. The BZA hearing is scheduled for October 6, 2026. - Extension of Docket F-0125 – Matt Toole (Infinity Homes & Development): The applicant requested a one-year extension for a previously approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) for an 85-acre site at the old salvage yard. The extension was needed due to delays in securing sewer service. The PUD includes a commercial strip and a residential subdivision (already separately approved). The applicant noted they might develop a smaller portion using septic temporarily. The extension was approved by voice vote. - Minutes of August 18, 2026: The minutes were approved by voice vote, with one abstention from a member who was not present at the August meeting. Key Outcomes - Docket F-6-26 and C-1026: Variance and subdivision approved (voice vote, all in favor). - Docket C-1126: Primary and secondary plat approved with 30-day moratorium (voice vote, one abstention). - Docket B-2426: Favorable recommendation forwarded to BZA with a condition restricting commercial use (voice vote, all in favor). - Extension of Docket F-0125: One-year extension granted (voice vote, all in favor). - Minutes of August 18, 2026: Approved (voice vote, one abstention).

The Clayton County Board of Commissioners held a second millage rate hearing on September 15, 2026, at 5:30 PM. The meeting was abbreviated to conclude by 5:55 PM to accommodate a subsequent regular board meeting at 6:00 PM. The CFO presented proposed property tax increases for the maintenance and operations (M&O) and fire funds, and two residents spoke in favor of the increases. No vote was taken on the millage rate; the final adoption hearing is scheduled for September 24, 2026. Public Comments & Testimony - Dr. Henry Anderson, a resident of District E in unincorporated Clayton County, expressed strong support for the proposed millage rate increase. He emphasized that the increase is nominal (e.g., $93/year for his home value, approximately $7.83/month) and that residents can adjust discretionary spending to accommodate it. He commended the CFO's presentation. - Mickey Garber, a resident of District 1 in unincorporated Rex, Georgia, spoke in favor of the increase. He stated that higher costs for services are expected and that the county must invest in public safety and education to become a destination. He supported better pay for county employees to reduce attrition and retain talent. Discussion Items - Millage Rate Presentation — Chief Financial Officer Terry Jackson presented the proposed 2026 millage rates: - Maintenance and Operations (M&O) Fund: Rollback rate of 14.141 mills; proposed rate of 15.052 mills (a 6.44% increase). - Fire Fund: Rollback rate of 4.068 mills; proposed rate of 4.500 mills (a 10.62% increase). - Notices of tax increases were published in the Clayton County newspaper on September 2, 2026. - Example tax bill impacts: - For a $250,000 home with homestead exemption: an increase of $76.86/year ($6.41/month). - For a $425,000 home without homestead exemption: an increase of $145.18/year ($12.10/month). - The tax increase funds $7.8 million in amendments to the fiscal year 2027 budget, including: - $6.4 million in salaries: a one-time pay incentive for non-sworn personnel, a 10% cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) for sworn personnel effective January 2, 2027, and a 2% COLA for all other personnel effective July 4, 2026. - Additional hiring of six paramedic sergeants and six firefighter EMTs. - Increased costs for elections, courts, and county operations. - No questions were asked by board members after the presentation. Key Outcomes - The agenda was adopted unanimously at the start of the meeting. - The public hearing was held with two speakers; no other members of the public commented. - No vote was taken on the millage rate itself. The final millage rate hearing and adoption is scheduled for September 24, 2026, at 6:00 PM in the same chambers. - The meeting was adjourned by unanimous vote.

The board convened a special meeting to hear multiple appeals regarding tree removal permits, public comments on procedural changes, and decisions on several contested cases. The meeting began with routine approvals, then public comments, followed by individual agenda items. Consent Calendar - Approved absence waivers for Members Capeta, O'Dell, and Ryan. - Approved minutes from the July 21, 2026 meeting. Public Comments & Testimony - Multiple speakers criticized the new format of hearing all public comments at the start of the meeting rather than per item, arguing it suppresses public involvement and makes it difficult to comment after presentations. - Speakers expressed support for preserving mature trees and criticized the city's tree removal practices, noting that appeals are a response to egregious removals. - Online comments were read into the record supporting several appeals, emphasizing the value of mature trees for shade, cooling, stormwater management, and wildlife habitat, and urging preservation over removal. - Specific comments on the Gifford Lane case noted progress in negotiations between neighbors and the developer, with hope for a settlement. Discussion Items - Items 3 & 4 – 3161 Gifford Lane (Two Appeals Consolidated): Staff reported proposed removal of 7 trees (118 inches total DBH) including three Royal Poinciana specimens. Appellants and developer reached a tentative agreement to preserve most trees, with only one Royal Poinciana removed and replaced with two live oaks (12-inch DBH). The developer agreed to revised tree layout (LO1/LO2 version 6) including relocation and preservation. The board modified the intended decision to incorporate the agreed-upon plan. Motion to deny appeal in part and grant in part passed 5-0. - Item 5 – 161 Northwest 29th Street: Appeal of removal of 4 hardwood trees (49 inches DBH) for a 12-story commercial building (43,541 sq ft, 173 ft height). Appellant (David Winker) claimed trees were cut down; applicant (David Lombardi) disputed and provided letters of support. Staff confirmed retention of one specimen mahogany with bond. Board found no basis for appeal and voted to deny (uphold permit) 5-0. - Item 6 – 4141 Northwest Fifth Avenue: Appeal of removal of 4 hardwood trees (78 inches DBH) for an ADU (1,066 sq ft plus carport). Appellant argued code requires redesign to preserve trees. After debate, the board proposed enhanced mitigation: five 8-inch live oaks and four 4-inch orange Geigers (replacing original nine 6-inch orange Geigers). Motion to deny appeal in part with modifications passed 4-1 (Member Trachtenberg dissenting). - Item 9 – 131 Northwest 75th Street: Appeal by Miami Tree Preservation Action Committee of removal of 23 trees (317 inches DBH) for a pickleball facility. Applicant challenged standing, citing lack of identified aggrieved members. Board found appellant failed to demonstrate standing (no members with specific injury within 500 feet identified in appeal). Motion to dismiss for lack of standing passed 6-0. - Item 10 – 7538 Northeast First Court: Same appellant, same standing issue. Appellant acknowledged similar deficiency. Applicant (Natalie Duran) expressed concern about being labeled as environmentally racist. Motion to dismiss for lack of standing passed 6-0. Key Outcomes - Item 1: Continued to October 13, 2026 special meeting. - Items 2, 7, 8: Withdrawn. - Items 3 & 4: Appeal denied in part, granted in part; tree permit modified per agreed plan (exhibit A). - Item 5: Appeal denied; intended decision upheld. - Item 6: Appeal denied in part; mitigation modified to five 8-inch live oaks and four 4-inch orange Geigers. - Items 9 & 10: Appeals dismissed for lack of standing. - All decisions are final unless appealed to the hearing boards division within 15 days.