Public Meetings - Edison, New Jersey

The Edison Township Council met on Wednesday, March 11, 2026, at 7:02 PM for its regular meeting. The council approved the minutes of the February 25, 2026 combined meeting, introduced an ordinance to vacate a portion of Thomas Place, adopted the consent agenda, and heard public comment. Consent Calendar - Approved minutes of the combined meeting of February 25, 2026 (unanimous). - Adopted the consent agenda comprising routine resolutions (unanimous). Public Comments & Testimony - Elizabeth Conway (20 Netherwood Circle) spoke regarding the proposed ordinance to vacate Thomas Place. While expressing general support for redevelopment, she voiced concerns that the reported plan for 70 apartments in a four-story building would be "overkill" for the small area. She noted traffic and parking challenges on the one-way street and urged the council to carefully consider the project's density before final approval. Discussion Items - Introduction of Ordinance: Vacation of Thomas Place: The council held a first reading and voted to introduce an ordinance authorizing the vacation of a portion of Thomas Place (NJSA 40:67-1). The ordinance was introduced by a unanimous roll-call vote (7-0). The public hearing and final vote are scheduled for the next regular meeting on March 25, 2026. Key Outcomes - The minutes of February 25, 2026 were unanimously approved. - The ordinance to vacate Thomas Place was introduced (first reading) by a 7-0 vote. - The consent agenda was adopted unanimously. - The meeting was adjourned following public comment. - The public hearing and final vote on the Thomas Place vacation ordinance will take place on March 25, 2026.

The Edison Township Council held a work session on March 9, 2026, beginning at 6:00 PM and adjourning at 6:35 PM. Council President Joe Coyle presided. The meeting focused on recognizing the achievements of the Edison Jets cheerleading teams and conducting routine business, including review of minutes, proposed ordinances, and departmental reports. All votes were unanimous. Consent Calendar - Minutes: Approved from the combined meeting of February 25, 2026 (no objections). - Proposed Ordinance: Authorizing the vacation of certain portions of Thomas Place (NJSA 40:67-1) – no comments. - Business Administrator Report (Items A&B): No comments. - Finance Department Report (Items A-E): No comments. - Planning & Engineering Report (Items A-J): Councilmember Kentos asked for elaboration on Item B (traffic signal improvement contract). The administration explained it is a DOT grant for Truman and Kilmer Road lights (new infrastructure). Total bid award to AGM Contractors Inc. for $484,435 – all grant funded and came under budget. - Public Works Report (Items A&B): Councilmember Kentos asked if Item B (aftermarket parts for older vehicles) was routine – confirmed yes. - Recreation Department Report: No comments. - Township Clerk Report: No comments. Public Comments & Testimony - Resolution 1 (Pee Wee Cheer Team): Tyja Caldwell (parent) spoke in support, commending the team's perseverance through obstacles and thanking coaches, staff, and families. No other members of the public spoke. - Resolution 2 (Junior Varsity Cheer Team): Jen West (chair coordinator and parent) spoke in support, highlighting the team's resilience and growth over many years. No other public comment. Discussion Items - Resolution 1 – Recognition of 2025-2026 Edison Jets Pee Wee Cheer Team: The team achieved Central Jersey, Gordon State, Eastern Regional, and Pop Warner National Championships, plus YCADA Global Silver Medalists and first-place honors at multiple local competitions. Councilmembers and coaches praised the team's dedication, teamwork, and sacrifice. The team's coach (Dana LePenta) noted an undefeated season against a background of practice deficits and limited resources. Team members spoke about the family-like atmosphere. - Resolution 2 – Recognition of 2025-2026 Edison Jets Junior Varsity Cheer Team: The JV team completed an undefeated season, earning back-to-back Pop Warner National Championships (2024-25), YCADA Global Champions, and highest overall score in level 13 divisions. Councilmembers and parents highlighted the team's persistence and character. Team members expressed pride in their growth as a family. - Committee Reports: No reports were given; Council President thanked the Department of Public Works for excellent snow removal performance, noting planning began in May of the prior year. Key Outcomes - Resolution 1 (Pee Wee Cheer Team): Adopted unanimously. Roll call vote: Councilmembers Dima (yes), Kentos (yes), Patel (yes), Schmuel (yes), Coyle (yes). Councilmember Bartel was present but did not vote initially; later Councilmember Patel voted again. (All votes counted as yes.) - Resolution 2 (JV Cheer Team): Adopted unanimously. Roll call vote: Councilmembers Dima (yes), Kantos (yes), Patel (yes), Petil (yes), Schmuel (yes), Coyle (yes). (Note: Cataloging discrepancies in names – likely Patel and Petil refer to same person.) - Other Items: All consent calendar items and departmental reports were approved without objection. Meeting adjourned at 6:35 PM.

The Edison Township Council held a combined work session and regular meeting on February 25, 2026, starting at 6:07 PM and adjourning at 7:36 PM. The council addressed several ordinances, including changes to military leave policy, a proposed council salary increase, a drainage project, and public comment time limits. Public testimony highlighted concerns over military benefits, council salaries, and the reduction of public speaking time from six to four minutes. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: Work session of February 9, 2026, and regular meeting of February 11, 2026, were approved unanimously. - Volunteer Firefighters: Appointments of Robert Serverdo, Justin Boslett, Sean Weeks, Jake Callodis, and Nicholas Johnstone were approved. - Consent Agenda Resolutions: All resolutions under item 18 were adopted unanimously after no public comments or council pulls. Public Comments & Testimony - Ordinance 2273 (Military Leave): Elizabeth Conway and Joy Shibb expressed opposition, arguing the change reduces benefits for employees serving in the military by capping pay and eliminating overtime opportunities. The township attorney and Business Administrator clarified that the ordinance does not reduce existing benefits, extends active duty paid leave from 90 to 150 workdays, and that overtime was never part of the calculation. Council comments indicated some members felt the ordinance was unnecessary or unfair to veterans. - Ordinance 2275 (Council Salaries): No public comments were taken because the ordinance was tabled before public hearing. - Ordinance 2276 (Drainage Project): No public comments. - Ordinance 2277 (Public Speaking Time): Multiple residents (Margot Harris, Thomas Wackey, Elizabeth Conway, Joyce Shibb, Ajit) spoke in favor of restoring the six-minute public comment limit, arguing that four minutes is insufficient for complex issues, that the reduction was a punitive reaction to past disruptions, and that it undermines democratic participation. Some speakers also requested reinstatement of a rebuttal period. - Oral Petitions: Divakar Gupta, representing the NJ Royals nonprofit (cricket for youth aged 8–16), requested township funding. The Business Administrator stated a funding formula for youth sports is being developed and an ordinance is expected by end of March 2026. - Additional Public Comments: Margot Harris thanked DPW for snow removal, criticized the council for the 2277 vote, and expressed concern over council salaries. Joyce Shibb criticized spending on the TOAF Center and the Stelton property, and accused the council of controlling the narrative. Thomas Wackey expressed disappointment over the failure of 2277 and criticized the 46% raise proposed for council. Discussion Items - Ordinance 2273 (Military Leave): Council President Coyle supported the ordinance, stating it clarifies definitions and expands combat zone leave. Councilmember Brusher opposed, citing no input from affected military personnel. Councilmember Dima opposed, stating he would never take a dime from veterans. The ordinance was adopted 4-2-1 (Brusher no, Dima yes, Cantos abstain, Patel yes, Petil no, Schmuel yes, Coyle yes). - Ordinance 2275 (Council Salaries): Councilmembers discussed the proposed raise of $45,000 for council members. Some argued the timing was premature and should be considered during the budget review. A motion to table was approved 6-1 (Brusher no, others yes). - Ordinance 2276 (Drainage Project): Councilmember Dima praised the project as a "dream come true." The ordinance was adopted unanimously. - Ordinance 2277 (Public Speaking Time): Councilmember Patel moved to table for further review, but the motion failed due to lack of a second. A motion to adopt failed 3-3-1 (Brusher yes, Dima no, Cantos yes, Patel abstain, Petil yes, Schmuel no, Coyle no). Council President Coyle noted that the time limit can be revisited in future meetings. - Councilmember Reports: - Councilmember Petil requested a speed limit reduction to 25 mph on Talmadge and Grove Avenue, flashing lights at intersections, re-establishment of a farmers market, an update on the Stelton property, and better coordination with the school board on sidewalk snow removal. The Business Administrator reported that 20 warnings were issued that day for sidewalk snow violations near schools. - Councilmember Patel discussed AI and smart city initiatives, planning to present a proposal at a future date. Key Outcomes - Ordinance 2273 (Military Leave) was adopted (4-2-1). - Ordinance 2275 (Council Salaries) was tabled (6-1). - Ordinance 2276 (Drainage Project) was adopted (7-0). - Ordinance 2277 (Public Speaking Time) was defeated (3-3-1). - Consent Agenda was adopted unanimously. - Youth Sports Funding: The Business Administrator will present a funding formula ordinance by end of March 2026. - Sidewalk Snow Enforcement: 20 warnings issued; continued enforcement planned near schools. - Speed Limit Study: Request to review and potentially reduce speed limits on Talmadge and Grove Avenue will be addressed by the administration.

The Edison Township Council met on February 11, 2026, to conduct regular business. Key actions included the reintroduction of a salary ordinance and a proposed change to public speaking time from four to six minutes. Public comment covered snow removal, the Stelton Community Center, affordable housing, and other community concerns. Consent Calendar - Minutes Approval: The council approved the minutes from the previous meeting. - Resolution R104: Confirming the Edison Wetlands Association representative to the Peter J. Barnes Wildlife Reserve Commission was approved unanimously as part of the consent agenda. Public Comments & Testimony - John Pointer (Roosevelt Blvd.): Expressed support for R104, noting the commission's progress in formalizing procedures. - Thomas Lucky (Netherwood Circle): Questioned the $347,000 change order (R095) for work from 2023 and the $357,000 asbestos abatement at Stelton Community Center (R096), calling for transparency and asking if the Stelton spending was within budget. - Anthony D'Amel (Edison): Asked for an explanation of the $65,000 health educator contract (R086). - Joyce Sherman (Edison): Criticized spending on the Stelton building, warned of deficits, and urged fiscal caution. - Joel Bassoff (Beach Lane): Questioned whether R095 should have been competitively rebid and asked for the scope of work justifying the $357,000 price tag for R096. Later, he asked about the budget deadline, affordable housing litigation, and the need for modern definitions of logistics centers. - Elizabeth Conway (Netherwood Circle): Raised snow removal issues, asked for committee liaisons, and commented on the proposed six-minute speaking time, stating it was a slap in the face when reduced to four minutes. - Susan Malone Barber (Pleasant Ave.): Thanked the council for introducing the six-minute speaking time, calling it a restoration of public trust. - Dr. Nasser (Pleasant Ave.): Discussed sidewalk snow compliance, requested a clarification amendment to ordinance 2234-2024 regarding TRC changes, and asked if Stelton could be sold back to the school district. - Joyce Sherman (Edison): Criticized the council for not acknowledging Martin Luther King Jr. Day, compared council salaries to Woodbridge, and called for action on the north side food desert. - John Pointer (Roosevelt Blvd.): Presented a concept for a community center at the Jade Dynasty property on Amboy Avenue, arguing it would revitalize the corridor and serve as an anchor. - Ben Alexander (Edison): Praised snow removal efforts, promoted the Shoveler app, and urged continued work on the Stelton Community Center. Discussion Items - Ordinance 2277 (Public Speaking Time): Council President Coyle argued against tabling, calling for a careful study of the appropriate time limit. Councilmember Kentos supported restoring six minutes, stating it was the previous standard for 15 years. A motion to table failed, and the ordinance was introduced with a 4-3 vote (Councilmembers Brusher, Dima, Kentos, Patel, Patil all voted yes; Councilmembers Schmuel and Coyle voted no). Introduced for a public hearing on February 25, 2026. - Ordinance 2275 (Salary Ordinance): Reintroduced after being tabled earlier. Public comment noted the proposed figure of $26,500, which was a 50% increase from $17,500. Council President Coyle defended the increase as a way to make council service accessible to middle-income residents. - Resolution R096 (Stelton Community Center Asbestos Abatement): Extensive debate on the cost and necessity. Councilmember Brusher suggested hiring a construction manager to avoid cost overruns. Council President Coyle noted the resolution would put all options on the table for the mayor. The resolution passed 4-3 (Councilmembers Dima, Kentos, Patel, Coyle in favor; Brusher, Patil, Schmuel opposed). Key Outcomes - Ordinances Introduced: 2273 (military leave), 2275 (salary), 2276 (drainage project), and 2277 (public speaking time) were all introduced for a public hearing on February 25, 2026. - Ordinance 2274 (Handicap Parking): Adopted unanimously. - Consent Agenda: Adopted without R096, which was voted on separately. - Resolution R096: Passed with a 4-3 vote. - Council Committees: Finalized list of committee liaisons to be distributed by February 17, 2026. - Next Steps: The council will continue discussions on the Stelton Community Center, affordable housing, and the Amboy Avenue revitalization.

The Edison Township Council held a work session on February 9, 2026, beginning at 6:00 PM and adjourning at approximately 6:45 PM. The meeting covered ordinances, departmental reports, public comments, and discussions on snow removal, community center redevelopment, and other municipal matters. Public Comments & Testimony - Resident (Brasoff): Praised the Public Works and Fire Departments for their exemplary response to the recent blizzard. Congratulated newly elected Council Members Kentos, Patel, and Dima, and Council President Coyle. Urged the Council to postpone salary increases for themselves, recommending that any raises be applied to the next term. Also commended the Council for reconsidering the ordinance that would reduce compensation for municipal employees serving in the military. - Resident: Delivered a lengthy statement alleging government misconduct related to the Epstein files and Israel, and criticized proposed legislation against criticizing Israel. Directly questioned Council President Coyle about a photo with President Joe Biden, insinuating complicity in child abuse. Accused the Democratic Party of abusing children. - Anthony D'Ameron: Discussed the economic potential of hosting wrestling and lacrosse tournaments at the Jets field facility. Inquired about which department oversees event planning. Council President noted the Recreation Committee would be appointed on Wednesday and invited him to submit a proposal. Discussion Items - Ordinance 0273-2026 (Military Leave Policy): The Council President announced that the ordinance would be withdrawn and a new version introduced on Wednesday. Councilwoman Kentos noted it affected four employees. - Ordinance 0275-2026 (Salaries of Officers and Employees): Councilman Brescher requested a comparative salary and benefits report from two larger and two smaller towns. The administration agreed to provide it. - New Ordinance on Public Speaking Time Limits: Councilman Schmuel moved to add an ordinance limiting public speaking time to the agenda. The motion passed on a roll call vote of 6–1, with Council President Coyle opposed. The ordinance will be considered on Wednesday. - Calvert Avenue Drainage Project Ordinance: Councilman Dima expressed strong support, noting the project had been awaited for eight years. No opposition was voiced. - Stilton Community Center (Department of Planning & Engineering): A $357,000 proposal for environmental abatement, demolition documents, laser scanning, and concept layout was presented. Councilman Brescher questioned the high cost and scope, suggesting that demolishing the building might be more economical. The engineer explained the tasks were necessary due to unknown asbestos extent and the building's intended community use. Councilman Schmuel asked about the front facade. The Council agreed to discuss the matter further with the administration before deciding. - Resolution on Edison Wetlands Association: The Township Clerk added a resolution to confirm a representative to the Peter J. Barnes III Wildlife Preservation. It will be voted on Wednesday. - Snow Removal and Sidewalk Enforcement: Councilman Patel raised concerns about sidewalk clearance after the blizzard. The Business Administrator stated that Zoning had issued warnings and then summonses for non-compliance; school-area sidewalks are coordinated with the school district; and Metro Park (state highway) issues are handled with NJ DOT. Council President emphasized the DPW's excellent work during a 20-year storm. - Drainage Issue on Marshall and Highland: Councilman Schmuel followed up on a drainage complaint. Engineering reported that survey work indicated resurfacing and valley gutter restoration could resolve the issue, tentatively scheduled for late spring as part of the paving program. - Committee Appointments: Council President noted that committees, including Recreation, would be appointed at the Wednesday meeting. Councilwoman Dima volunteered for the Cultural Arts Committee. Key Outcomes - Ordinance 0273-2026: Withdrawn; a new version will be introduced on Wednesday. - Ordinance on Speaking Time Limits: Added to the Wednesday agenda after a 6–1 vote. - Calvert Avenue Drainage Ordinance: Proceeded without objection. - Stilton Community Center Proposal: Deferred for further administrative review. - Resolution on Edison Wetlands Association: Added to the Wednesday agenda. - Snow Removal Enforcement: Zoning to continue warnings and summonses; coordination with schools and NJ DOT noted. - Drainage Fix: Engineering to include in late spring paving program. - Next Meeting: The Council will hold a regular meeting on Wednesday where formal votes on these items are expected.

The Edison Township Council held a combined meeting on January 28, 2026, starting at 6:00 p.m. The meeting included the approval of minutes, adoption of ordinances, introduction of new ordinances, public comments, and council discussions. Key topics included changes to the Technical Review Committee (TRC), a proposed military leave ordinance, a substantial council salary increase ordinance, and public concerns about snow removal and sidewalks. Consent Calendar - The minutes of the combined meeting of December 22, 2025, and the reorganization meeting of January 5, 2026, work session of January 12, 2026, and regular meeting of January 14, 2026, were approved unanimously. - The consent agenda, including resolutions R-60 through R-79, was adopted unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Octor Nasser (Pleasant Avenue) expressed apprehension about Ordinance 2272, which moves the Technical Review Committee (TRC) meetings to non-public sessions. He argued this would reduce residents' ability to review and prepare for planning board applications, noting that the 10-day statutory notice window under the Municipal Land Use Law (MLUL) is insufficient. He questioned why the change is beneficial to residents and asked for clarification about availability of minutes. Council members responded that the TRC only reviews completeness of applications and that all information will be public at the planning board level within 45 days. - Anthony D.A.R.N. (Edison) asked if there was any recent litigation regarding the public nature of TRC meetings. The attorney indicated they would look into it. - Margot Harris (43 Oak Hills Road) strongly opposed the proposed council salary increase (Ordinance 2275), calling it a 120% raise from $17,500 to $38,500-$39,500. She stated it was "greed, audacity, arrogance, and tone-deaf," especially given the council's reduction of public speaking time from six to four minutes. She noted that as former council president, she refused to place a similar ordinance on the agenda in November 2025 because it would have benefited outgoing members with retroactive pay. She urged a no vote. - Andrew Sellers (24 Coster, Edison, Marine Corps recruiter) spoke about the military leave ordinance (2273), emphasizing that consistency and strong employer support directly impact military recruitment and retention. He urged the council not to reduce benefits or create uncertainty for service members. He noted that he heard Councilman Schmuel question the ordinance and asked that it be carefully reviewed to ensure no benefits are stripped. - Elizabeth Conway (20 Netherwood Circle) asked for clarification on the definition of a Class III member of the planning board (for Resolution 79). She also criticized the salary increase as "embarrassing" and questioned the council's reasoning. She inquired about committee assignments for liaisons, particularly the Human Relations Commission. - A resident (name not given) accused the council of "grift" and criticized the salary increase, comparing it unfavorably to the unpaid work of school board members and the dedication of former councilman Bob Deal. He also expressed frustration with the four-minute speaking limit. - Anthony Jammer (Edison) supported the mayor's salary increase but questioned the council's raise, suggesting that if salaries are increased, the council should have more responsibilities, such as ward representation or a township-issued cell phone and office. He also commented on snow removal enforcement. - Dr. Nasser (Pleasant Avenue) returned to speak about the salary increase, stating the argument that higher pay would attract middle-class candidates is flawed because it should have been raised before or during the election cycle. He also raised concerns about incomplete sidewalks near schools, snow removal enforcement, and the lack of response to previous requests. He referenced a prior complaint about snow being moved onto residents' properties. - A speaker (name not given) criticized the council for targeting a police officer (David Tingle) with Ordinance 2273, alleging it was retaliation for his constitutionally protected activity. He also referenced the council's past ban on the American flag and called the salary increase "disgusting." Discussion Items - Ordinance 2272 – Technical Review Committee (TRC) Amendment: The council discussed the change to make TRC meetings non-public, limited to administrative completeness review. Council members explained it streamlines the process and does not affect public participation at the planning board level. Public comment expressed concerns about transparency. The ordinance was adopted by a vote of 6-0 (Councilman Brescher not voting? Actually roll call showed all yes: Brescher, Dima, Kentos, Patel, Schmuel, Coyle – all yes). - Ordinance 2273 – Military Leave: Introduced for first reading. Councilman Schmuel expressed a desire to review the ordinance further before voting. The attorney clarified that the ordinance aligns with state statute, updating definitions and terms (e.g., changing "must" to "shall") without stripping benefits. Council President Coyle and others agreed to allow introduction and then consider tabling at the next meeting. The ordinance was introduced by a vote of 5-1 (Councilman Brescher opposed). - Ordinance 2274 – Handicapped Parking Spaces: Introduced. Councilman Coyle asked about logistics of updating the list. The chief indicated the list is maintained via DMV verification and staff handles discrepancies. Introduced unanimously. - Ordinance 2275 – Council Salaries: Introduced amid significant public opposition. Council members debated the justification. Councilman Brescher argued that the job requires thorough budget review and deserves higher pay. Councilman Kentos said he was impartial and noted he answers calls constantly. Council President Coyle stated the increase (from $1,200 in 1966 to $38,500 today) would open the door to younger and middle-class candidates. The BA confirmed retroactive pay to January 1 would be included. Introduced by a vote of 6-0 (all yes). - Snow Removal and Sidewalks: Multiple public comments and council responses addressed snow removal, enforcement, and missing sidewalks near schools. The chief reported that over 102 summonses were issued on January 27 and 80 on January 28 for violating parking restrictions. The DPW director said they will address specific corners and sidewalks. Councilman Patel raised the possibility of acquiring snow-clearing equipment (e.g., a "dragon" device) for driveways, to be considered in budget planning. - Speaking Time: Councilman Brescher announced he will make a motion at a future meeting to restore the six-minute public speaking time, and Council President Coyle agreed to place it on the agenda. Key Outcomes - Minutes Approved: Unanimous approval of minutes from December 22, 2025, and January 5, 12, 14, 2026. - Ordinance 2271 (Boards/Commissions) Adopted: Unanimous vote. - Ordinance 2272 (TRC) Adopted: Unanimous vote (6-0). - Ordinance 2273 (Military Leave) Introduced: Passed 5-1 (Brescher opposed) for first reading; second reading and public hearing set for February 11, 2026. Councilman Schmuel will review and may seek to table. - Ordinance 2274 (Handicapped Parking) Introduced: Unanimous; public hearing February 11, 2026. - Ordinance 2275 (Council Salaries) Introduced: Unanimous; public hearing February 11, 2026. Retroactive pay to January 1, 2026, is anticipated. - Consent Agenda Adopted: Unanimous. - Resolution 79 (Councilman Schmuel appointed Class III to Planning Board) Approved: Part of consent agenda. - Future Agenda Items: Motion to restore six-minute speaking time will be placed on a future agenda. - State of the Township Address: Announced for February 3, 2026, at 7 p.m. at Pines Manor. - Valentine’s Disability Dance: February 7, 2026, 6-8:30 p.m. at Mini B. Center.

The Township of Edison Zoning Board of Adjustment held a special meeting on January 27, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. in Council Chambers. The board elected officers for the year, announced two cases carried to future dates, and heard two applications for bulk variances. Both applications were denied by unanimous votes. Board Reorganization and Appointments - Michael Kamba was unanimously elected Chairperson for the upcoming year. - Dan O'Gorman was unanimously elected Vice Chair. - Rachel Ruguerio was unanimously named Secretary to the Zoning Board of Adjustment. - Lindsay Knight of Neglia Planning was unanimously appointed as professional planner to the board. - Delaware Raritan Engineering (represented by Mr. Carly) was unanimously appointed as professional engineer to the board. - Mark Rogoff appeared as attorney for the zoning board, pending formal appointment. Announcements – Cases Carried - Case Z2-2020 (Lamar Advertising a Penn, LLC) at 81 and 101 U.S. Highway 1 was carried to March 31, 2026, with no renotice required. - Case Z27-2025 (Vikosh Sharma) at 36 Rainford Road was carried to February 17, 2026, with no renotice required. Case Z13-2025: Lake Home Renovations LLC at 17 Gene Place Applicant's Request: Seek bulk variances (C2) to legalize an existing single-family dwelling constructed with a front yard setback of 20.9 feet (required 25 feet) and a side yard setback of 9.6 feet (required 10 feet). The applicant attributed the errors to a layout mistake: the foundation was measured from the edge of pavement rather than the property line. Testimony (John DePont, PE/PP): - The dwelling is nearly complete; variances are requested to legalize the as-built condition. - The front yard deviation is 4.1 feet; side yard deviation is 4 inches. - No impact on drainage, site lines, or stormwater; impervious coverage was slightly reduced. - The applicant agreed to comply with all conditions in the township engineer's report. - Aerial exhibit (A3) showed other homes on the block with front yard setbacks less than 25 feet, but measurements were estimated from Google imagery, not surveyed. - DePont testified the house blends into the neighborhood visually and does not impair the zone plan. Public Comments: - Joan Rosen (9 Gene Place): Expressed concerns about the process—the house was nearly complete before neighbors were notified; worried that approving a builder's mistake would set a bad precedent for future construction. - Mike Rose (9 Gene Place): Stated he did not want an approval to set a precedent for other builders to follow; questioned why professionals were not involved earlier to prevent the error. Board Discussion & Motion: - Vice Chairman O'Gorman moved to deny, stating the application had not met positive and negative criteria, the mistake was self-imposed (no survey used to lay the foundation), and the variances did not match neighborhood character. - The motion was seconded and passed unanimously (8-0). Key Outcome: Application denied. Case Z34-2025: Bargive Choksky at 22 Augusta Avenue Applicant's Request: Seek bulk variances to construct a first-floor master bedroom addition to accommodate the applicant’s elderly parents who cannot use stairs. Variances needed: front yard setback – proposed 13.78 feet (required 25 feet); lot depth – existing 90 feet (required 100 feet, an existing nonconformity). Testimony (Mr. Fletcher, PE/PP): - The addition would be placed on the side (Lynch Avenue side) to preserve usable rear yard space. - Exhibit A1 (tax map) showed five nearby properties with front yard setbacks less than 25 feet, including one directly across the street at 8.5 feet. - The applicant stated no construction has begun. - Fletcher argued the variance meets C1 criteria due to the unique shape of the lot and that the addition would not adversely impact the zone plan or neighborhood. Notice Deficiency Issue: - Board counsel noted the public notice was potentially defective: it referred to vague code sections without specifying the variances (front yard setback, side yard, etc.), making it unclear to the public what relief was sought. Counsel warned this could be jurisdictional. - After consultation, the applicant chose to proceed despite the notice issue, understanding that the board would decide on the merits. Public Comments: None. Board Discussion & Motion: - Vice Chairman O'Gorman moved to deny, stating the positive and negative criteria were not met, the comparative exhibit (A1) was insufficient and unclear, lot sizes differed, and the presentation lacked clarity. - The motion was seconded and passed unanimously (8-0). Key Outcome: Application denied. Key Outcomes - Z13-2025 (17 Gene Place): Denied (8-0). - Z34-2025 (22 Augusta Avenue): Denied (8-0). - Both denials were moved by Vice Chairman O'Gorman and seconded by Mr. Sidoto, with unanimous roll call votes.

The Edison Township Council met on January 14, 2026, to discuss and act on several agenda items including ordinance introductions, amendments to a Technical Review Committee (TRC) ordinance and a professional services resolution, public comments, and appointments. The meeting included roll call, approval of a consent agenda with separate votes on certain resolutions, and oral petitions from residents. Key actions included amending the TRC ordinance to transfer sidewalk waiver authority to the Planning Board, amending Resolution 035 to add a second appraisal firm, and approving multiple appointments and professional service contracts. Consent Calendar - The consent agenda was adopted after withdrawing resolutions 041–047 (professional service contracts) and 016–026 (appointments and reappointments) for separate votes. The remaining resolutions were approved unanimously. - Prior to adoption, Resolution 035 (appraisal services) was amended to include both Integra Realty Resources and Real Property Analytics with a combined not-to-exceed $100,000, and then included in the consent agenda. Public Comments & Testimony - Elizabeth Conway (20 Netherwood Circle) – Asked whether Monroe Park Veterinary Hospital (Resolution 048) is located in Monroe, New Jersey, and why a closer facility was not chosen. The attorney confirmed it is in Monroe and was selected through a fair and open bid process. - John Pointer (Roosevelt Boulevard, former councilmember) – Expressed support for Resolution R17 appointing Margot Harris to the Cultural Arts Commission, praising her role in creating the commission. Also supported reappointments of directors (Sonia, Dr. Patel, Lena, Lou) and appointments of Brian Picorello, Tony Costa, and Dan Reeve as directors. Thanked John Soltez for his service on the Planning Board and supported Mayor Joshi’s appointment of Nish Patel to the Planning Board. - Nish Patel (Melbourne Lane, former councilmember) – Congratulated Margot Harris on her appointment, stating she “built the foundation” of the Cultural Arts Commission. Expressed support for reappointed staff and thanked the council for his own appointment to the Planning Board. - Margot Harris (43 Oak Hills Road, former council president) – Thanked the council for approving her appointment to the Cultural Arts Commission. Urged the council to appoint a liaison to the commission, noting that underuse of gallery space and the dissolution of the Edison Arts Society had slowed progress. Highlighted the need for a performing arts venue and mentioned the success of the 2025 jazz festival. - Dr. Nasser (Pleasant Avenue) – Thanked Council Vice President Kentos for catching the sidewalk waiver issue in the TRC ordinance. Asked about the best way to communicate with council and raised concerns about a specific development on Amboy Avenue, including parking variances, form-based code compliance, and angled parking. The council president cautioned against using the meeting to re-litigate a planning board decision but noted ongoing review of the issues. - Stanley Phillips – Proposed a mobile senior market to address food insecurity among Edison’s seniors, operating as a nutrition clinic rather than a standard food truck. Requested changes to the food truck ordinance to allow such service at senior complexes. The council noted that permanent food truck spots are prohibited by current ordinance but suggested event-based partnerships with housing authorities. Discussion Items - Ordinance Amending Chapter 39 (Technical Review Committee) – The council introduced an ordinance to modify the TRC’s role. Councilman Kentos discovered an error: the original language allowed the TRC to grant sidewalk, curb, and gutter waivers, which could bypass the Planning Board. A motion to amend the ordinance to require the TRC to make recommendations on such waivers to the Planning Board passed unanimously (7–0). Councilman Brescia questioned the TRC’s purpose and expressed concern that removing planning board members from the TRC could slow projects; the attorney explained the TRC is a streamlined checklist review and does not preclude board input. The amended ordinance was then introduced on first reading, with a public hearing set for January 28, 2026 (vote: 7–0). - Resolution 035 Amendment – The council amended this resolution to add Real Property Analytics as a second firm for tax court appraisal services, with a combined $100,000 not-to-exceed. The amendment passed unanimously, and the resolution was included in the consent agenda. - Separate Votes on Resolutions – Resolutions 016–026 (appointments including Margot Harris to Cultural Arts Commission, reappointment of directors, and appointment of Nish Patel to Planning Board) and 041–047 (professional service contracts) were pulled for individual votes. Councilmembers expressed support, noting the qualifications of appointees and the value of the services. All resolutions passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - Ordinance Amendment (TRC) – The council voted unanimously to amend the ordinance to require the Technical Review Committee to make recommendations on sidewalk, curb, and gutter waivers to the Planning Board, rather than decide independently. The amended ordinance was introduced on first reading (public hearing January 28, 2026). - Resolution 035 Amendment – Approved unanimously, adding Real Property Analytics for appraisal services, combined not-to-exceed $100,000. - Consent Agenda Adoption – The consent agenda was approved, with resolutions 041–047 and 016–026 withdrawn for separate votes. - Separate Resolution Votes – All pulled resolutions (016–026 and 041–047) were adopted unanimously. - Public Comments Addressed – The council committed to following up on: website posting of the spot application form, restoration of online payment for the ABC aftercare program (expected within weeks), recreation reimbursement resolution, and review of the food truck ordinance in relation to mobile senior markets.

The Edison Planning Board held its reorganization meeting on January 13, 2026, at which the board reappointed officers, appointed professional advisors, and unanimously approved several resolutions including subdivision and site plan approvals, as well as a 90-day extension request. Consent Calendar - Resolution P14-2023 (Ankit Patel): Minor subdivision for 765–771 Wood Avenue; third extension approved unanimously. - Resolution P5261 (Markham Developers, LLC): Minor subdivision approved unanimously. - Resolution P12-2020 (Amazon.com Services LLC): Amended site plan approval approved unanimously. - Resolution P19-2023 (A and D Holdings, LLC): Preliminary and final major site plan approval approved unanimously. Key Outcomes - Reappointment of Chairman: Len Sandelski was unanimously reappointed as Chairman of the Planning Board. - Appointment of Vice Chairman: Jacob Reeder was unanimously appointed as Vice Chairman. - Appointment of Secretary: Cassandra Augustine was unanimously reappointed as Secretary to the Planning Board. - Appointment of Professional Planner: Neglia Engineering was appointed as the board's professional planner. - Appointment of Professional Engineer: Dela Rariton Engineering (Charlie Carley) was appointed as the board's professional engineer. - Appointment of Attorney: The Wiener Law Firm was appointed on a month-to-month basis pending review of submitted applications. - Extension Request (P03-2025 Victory Properties LLC): A 90-day first extension request, submitted by Tim Arch, Esquire of Bob Smith and Associates Law Firm, was unanimously approved. - Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned by unanimous motion.