Public Meetings - Edison, New Jersey

The Edison Township Planning Board convened on April 27, 2026, to consider routine approvals, a miscellaneous extension, and two major development applications: a senior age-restricted housing project at 1000 Inman Avenue (Fairway Country Club Urban Renewal) and a truck depot at 1970 Dock Road. The meeting included the swearing-in of Councilman Schmuel to the board, public testimony, and unanimous votes on all items. Consent Calendar - Approved minutes from March 16, 2026 and March 30, 2026 (unanimous roll call). - Approved resolutions: P-5262 (Federal Business Centers Inc. minor subdivision), P02-2026 (East and Coach Company LLC minor site plan with conditional use), P-12-2025 (ENFRA preliminary and final site plan), P-5263 (Gulberg Builders LLC minor subdivision), and the Housing Element and Fair Share Plan fourth round (all unanimous). - Approved a 90-day extension request for P-08-2025 (Arma Contracting, 230 Sylvan Dell) to await an exemption letter from Middlesex County Planning Board (unanimous). Public Comments & Testimony - Rosemary Piperado (owner of Inman Sports Complex and Villa Drive) expressed strong opposition to the Fairway Country Club project, stating the traffic study (conducted on a Tuesday) does not capture peak conditions on weekends, that accidents have occurred at the Villa/Inman intersection, and that Villa Drive is a private right-of-way not intended for public access. She questioned the lack of direct access to Inman Avenue. - Elizabeth Conway (20 Netherwood Circle) raised concerns about left-turn difficulty from Wakefield Drive onto Inman Avenue, noting it already takes up to seven minutes, and asked if accommodations would be made. - Kathy Ladislaw (16 Netherwood Circle) voiced traffic concerns, saying it takes 10 minutes to exit onto Inman, and asked about police assistance during construction. - Fred Boglisi (attorney for Torsiolo Associates, 27 Progress Street) noted that his client’s property floods one to two times per year and requested that any improvements to stormwater on the Fairway site reduce downstream impacts. He stated his client does not oppose the project. - Anoop Singh (10 Firethorn Drive) commented on the cumulative traffic impact of high-density development on Inman Avenue, emphasizing that the road is already heavily congested. Discussion Items - Fairway Country Club Urban Renewal (P01-2026) – Proposal for 254 senior age-restricted residential units (152 one-bedroom, 102 two-bedroom) in two four-story buildings over garage parking, clubhouse, pool, and amenities on 12 acres at 1000 Inman Avenue. The applicant presented extensive testimony: - Engineer Trevor Curtis detailed compliance with the 1000 Inman Avenue Redevelopment Plan, DEP flood hazard and wetland permits, stormwater management improvements (three basins reducing peak runoff by 50-80%), parking (454 spaces with 72 EV spaces, meeting RSIS with EV credit), access via three driveways on Villa Drive, and landscaping (240 trees proposed, applicant agreed to plant 250). - Architect Jack Raker described building layouts, unit mix, amenity spaces, and noted that all affordable units (51) are one-bedroom pending round-four requirements. - Traffic engineer Betsy Dolan reviewed a traffic study showing peak-hour trip generation below 100 (48 AM, 64 PM), existing Level of Service E at Villa/Inman intersection, and proposed improvements (left-turn lanes on Inman, separate left/right lanes from Villa) required by Middlesex County, which will improve traffic flow. - LSRP Cassidy Clink testified that the site (historic paint manufacturing) is 80-90% remediated; remaining work includes benzene soil excavation and groundwater monitoring; a deed notice, soil cap, and groundwater permit will be in place. - Planner Paul Grygiel addressed a potential planning variance under N.J.S.A. 40:55D-35 because access is via private Villa Drive rather than directly on Inman Avenue. He argued the criteria were satisfied due to the redevelopment plan’s requirements, existing easements, and adequate emergency vehicle access. - Board attorney and professionals discussed easement issues: current owner of Villa Drive (Rosemary Piperado) disputed unrestricted use. The board conditioned approval on verification of valid recorded easements. - Federal Business Centers Inc. Truck Depot (P14-2025) – Proposal for 52 trailer storage spaces on 2 acres of a 42-acre lot at 1970 Dock Road (RRD zone). Engineer Robert Espasa testified that the site is already a gravel lot; improvements include paving, security gate, lighting, retaining walls, and stormwater bioretention systems. The applicant has all major approvals (DEP, county, soil conservation). The use meets conditional use standards (no repair, painting, or salvage). Applicant will contribute to the Edison Tree Fund for tree credits. No variances requested. Key Outcomes - Fairway Country Club Urban Renewal – Approved unanimously (8-0) with conditions: (1) Township attorney review and approval of recorded easements for Villa Drive; (2) Easement for sewer line; (3) Middlesex County approval for traffic improvements; (4) Continued remediation by LSRP; (5) Compliance with board professionals' reports (DNR Engineering, Neglia Planning); (6) Any plan changes to return to the board. - Federal Business Centers Truck Depot – Approved unanimously (8-0) with conditions: compliance with DNR and Neglia reports; any changes to return to the board. - Meeting adjourned after no further business.

This meeting of the Edison Municipal Council began at 6:00 PM with the pledge of allegiance and a roll call of members present. The council reviewed the administrative agenda, which included items from multiple departments, and held an extended discussion on water and sewer department contracts related to the Administrative Consent Order (ACO). Public comments covered a range of topics including budget delays, affordable housing, and school district cooperation. All resolutions on the agenda were approved unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Lois Torre (Vice Chair, Cultural Arts Commission) questioned why several commission members whose terms had expired were not included in reappointment resolutions. Council President Coyle said he would follow up. - Joel Vasoff (Beach Lane, Edison) questioned the no-bid contract for Taurus Advisory Group, the high cost of sewer engineering (Resolutions 221 and 222), and the lateness of the township budget. He asked whether the council was concerned about missing the statutory deadline. - Elizabeth Conway (Netherwood Circle) requested clarity on whether resolution amounts were exact or not-to-exceed, noting that several resolutions lacked dollar figures (e.g., R199, R203). She also noted there was no phase two listed. - Harish Tatinani (McKinley Street) asked for revenue/cost data on the ABC before-after care program and sports field rentals, an update on sidewalks near schools, and improvement of road patch inspections. He urged the council to work more closely with the Board of Education and suggested a long-term bond for Talmadge land. - Ben (resident) praised the council and briefly commented on new car dealerships. - Joe Romano (Avenue C) recalled the 2008 cut of $6.5 million from the school budget and $12.5 million by Governor Christie, and urged fiscal responsibility. - Gulbindur Thamija (new attendee) suggested that the township could save money by self-insuring employee healthcare, and criticized property taxes as regressive. - Elizabeth Conway (returning) announced a Unity in the Air Kite Festival on May 2nd, reported a dangerous intersection at Inman Avenue and Old Raritan Road, and noted that the township received its budget in August under the prior administration. - Joyce Shipp (Edison) criticized the mayor’s aggressive stance toward the Board of Education, argued that bonds over $50,000 should require a referendum, and stated that subscription busing never paid for itself. - Joel Vasoff (returning) asked how Edison benefited from litigating against state affordable housing numbers and questioned the selection of Taurus. He also stated that the late budget put council members at risk of personal fines. - Sue (resident) called the public feud between the mayor and the Board of Education “embarrassing,” noting that the board presented a preliminary budget on time while the township had not. She urged cooperation. Discussion Items - Water and Sewer ACO Contracts (Resolutions 221 and 222): Councilman Brescher expressed strong frustration over hiring Lero Engineering for $583,641 (phase one design) and $788,832 (phases three through five inspection), arguing the township’s own sewer department could perform the work at lower cost. Councilwoman Kentos defended the department, stating that the ACO and Infrastructure Bank require outside engineering. Councilman Patel requested a complete breakdown of all planned phases and costs. The administration agreed to provide a timeline and host a separate meeting to review accomplishments. - Budget Timing: Multiple public commenters and council members addressed the failure to introduce a budget by the April deadline. Business Administrator Sonia stated that the budget would be introduced at the May 6th meeting, emphasizing the complexity of a near-$200 million budget. Council President Coyle noted that under the prior administration budgets were often delivered in August, so the current delay was an improvement. - Affordable Housing: Council President Coyle expressed strong support for affordable housing, stating he would “roll out the full 750 units” if community support were present. He noted ongoing discussions with council members about studio and micro housing. - Taurus Advisory Group Contract: The Business Administrator explained that Taurus is a professional energy broker; the contract is no-bid because it is a professional service, the township pays nothing, and compensation comes from vendors via bidding. Councilman Dima asked for historical cost comparison data. Key Outcomes - All resolutions on the agenda, including R199 (Taurus advisory), R201 (reappointments), R202 (computer vendor), R203 (auctioneer services), R204 (enhancement infrastructure grant), R221 (Lero phase one design), R222 (Lero phases three through five inspection), and R223 (budget transfer) were approved unanimously by roll call vote. - The administration will provide a comprehensive cost and timeline breakdown for the water and sewer ACO projects and schedule a separate meeting with council members. - The township budget is expected to be introduced at the next combined council meeting on May 6, 2026.

The Township of Edison Zoning Board of Adjustment held a regular meeting on April 21, 2026. The board approved minutes and two resolutions, held a closed session, and conducted a detailed hearing on a major application by Public Service Electric and Gas (PSE&G) for a new electrical substation. The board voted to continue the case to June 30, 2026, with the applicant agreeing to extend the time for board action. Consent Calendar - Minutes of March 31, 2026: Approved by roll call vote (7 yes, 0 no). - Resolution C-17-2025 (Suresh Modi): Approved by roll call vote (5 yes, 0 no). - Resolution Z-25-2025 (Hasbell of Northeast LLC): Approved by roll call vote (7 yes, 0 no). - Announcement: Case Z33-2025 (NHDP LLC at 136 Floyd Street) was carried to May 12, 2026, at 7 p.m. in Council Chambers. Discussion Items - Case Z5-2026 – PSE&G (South Edison Substation): PSE&G seeks preliminary and final site plan approval with multiple bulk and use variances to construct an electrical substation on three parcels: 130A Meadow Road, 101 Silver Lake Road, and 191 Meadow Road. The project includes a prefabricated substation, three stormwater infiltration basins, five new monopoles (two 150-foot, one 140-foot, two 95-foot), a 20-foot-high decorative concrete wall (350 feet long along the Penske lot), anti-cut/anti-climb fence, and control house. Proposed relief includes variances for a 16-foot-wide access road (minimum 22 feet), a 0.2-foot setback on the triangular lot (required 50 feet), and the wall located 3 feet from the property line. - Fact Witness – Sunil Mittal (PSE&G Project Manager): Testified that the existing Meadow Road substation (built 1965) is heavily loaded and may fail; the new substation will serve 14,300 customers in Edison and surrounding areas. The 20-foot wall is for security based on a NERC-CIP study and was designed in consultation with the township. No designated parking is needed – maintenance personnel park on the access drive. PSE&G will comply with Edison’s snow removal ordinance on the new sidewalk. - Expert Witness – Michael Blake (Civil Engineer, Burns & McDonnell): Presented site plans and renderings. The site has three infiltration basins to meet NJ stormwater requirements. No wetlands will be disturbed. The monopoles and wall are depicted in renderings; the board requested additional renderings from residential perspectives and with monopoles clearly visible. - Expert Witness – Joseph Keefe (Acoustical Consultant, Ostergaard Acoustical): Described noise modeling. Existing substation produces up to 44 dBA at nearest residences (with worst-case HVAC). New substation added increases to 45 dBA – still below the 50 dBA noise code limit. Ambient noise from the New Jersey Turnpike is about 47 dBA. The walls are not for acoustical purposes. The applicant agreed to post-construction noise studies (immediate and at six months) as a condition. - Board Discussion: Board members questioned construction safety, tree removal (to be addressed by landscape architect), and the need for the wall height. Board Engineer Mr. Carly noted potential lighting conflicts between Edison ordinance and federal security requirements, recommending a waiver. Board Planner Ms. Knight had no additional questions at this stage. Key Outcomes - Continuance: The board voted to continue Case Z5-2026 to June 30, 2026, at 7 p.m. in Council Chambers. The applicant agreed to extend the 120-day statutory timeframe for board action. - Conditions Stipulated: PSE&G will provide updated renderings from residential viewpoints, address all comments from the board engineer’s report, and comply with Edison ordinances regarding snow removal, garbage disposal, and noise enforcement. - No Public Testimony: No members of the public spoke during the public portion of the hearing.

The Edison Municipal Council met on April 7, 2026, at 6:10 PM. The meeting began with recognitions of two outstanding Edison High School wrestlers, followed by a closed session, reconvening at 7:06 PM. Key topics included a proposed 12% board of education budget increase, a tabled ordinance on sports organization funding, and resolutions for sports league payments and affordable housing. The meeting adjourned at approximately 7:30 PM. Consent Calendar - The minutes from the March 23, 2026 work session and regular meeting were approved. - A consent agenda containing routine resolutions (excluding 176 and 178) was approved unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Elizabeth Conway (20 Netherwood Circle) questioned whether the $224,975 in sports league funding covers field maintenance, noting that North Edison baseball/softball fields need paving and property ownership is unclear. She also expressed concern about the 12% school budget increase and overdevelopment in town. - Ron Laufler (6 Nancy Circle) urged the council to revise the ADU portion of Resolution 178 to include RB and RBB zones, arguing that limiting ADUs to RA zones excludes many residents from aging in place. He also asked about the carryover of 610 affordable housing units from the third round obligation. Discussion Items - Wrestler Recognitions: The council honored Fernando Avalon (143 wins, 109 pins) and Jeremy Nagorron (134 wins, 130 pins, ranked 13th in NJ all-time pins). Both were recognized for their achievements and contributions to Edison High School wrestling. Council President Coyle shared personal wrestling history and praised the athletes' dedication. - Board of Education Budget: Council President Coyle expressed concern over the proposed 12% increase, stating he will advocate for increased state funding. Council Vice President Kentos noted historical state underfunding and plans to question the superintendent about the formula. - Ordinance 2279-2026 (Sports Organization Funding): The proposed ordinance would modify Section 5-5 to remove a list of specific organizations and give the administration discretion to allocate funds. Councilmember Brescher raised concerns about the lack of a funding formula, potential arbitrary allocation, and the 75% Edison residency requirement (which could exclude leagues like hockey that partner with other towns). After debate, the council voted to table the ordinance to allow the administration to incorporate a clear formula. The existing ordinance and resolutions for current funding remained unaffected. - Affordable Housing Plan (Resolution 178): Attorney Christopher Zangaro explained that the ADU component is a future mechanism, not yet zoned. He clarified that deed-restricted affordable ADUs must be marketed regionally and cannot be rented to family members. He also confirmed the 610-unit carryover from the third round is accounted for as unmet need. Key Outcomes - Resolutions Approved: - Resolution 176-2026: Awarding $224,975 to nonprofit sports organizations (based on old formula) – approved unanimously. - Resolution 178-2026: Adopting the Fourth Round Affordable Housing Plan – approved unanimously. - Ordinance Tabled: Ordinance 2279-2026 was tabled (4-0) to allow revision of the funding formula; a meeting will be scheduled to reintroduce. - Closed Session: The council entered closed session for 15 minutes (from 6:30 PM to 7:06 PM) to discuss private legal matters.

The Edison Township Zoning Board of Adjustment held a special meeting on March 31, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers. The board approved minutes, a resolution, and heard two variance applications, both receiving unanimous approval. Consent Calendar - Minutes of March 24, 2026: Approved unanimously by roll call vote (6-0). - Resolution Z8-2025 (BAPS Edison, LLC): Approved unanimously (6-0). Announcements - Case Z2-2020 (Lamar Advertising at 81 and 101 U.S. Highway 1) was postponed to June 23, 2026, with no re-notice required. Case Z1-2026: Roanoke Park – 61 Livingston Ave. Variance: D4 variance for floor area ratio (FAR) – proposed 29.8% vs. maximum 25% in the RA zone (4.8% exceedance). Applicant: Sheetal Parik and family, seeking to construct a second-story addition to accommodate elderly parents with medical needs. Testimony: The applicant (an occupational therapist) explained the need for a single-level accessible living space. Architect Ronald Kasmorski presented plans for a lower level with kitchen, dining, family room, bedroom, and expanded garage. Planner Paul Fletcher testified that the site can accommodate the increased FAR, the use is permitted, and the negative criteria are satisfied. Public Comments: Four neighbors spoke in support, citing the applicant’s character and the need for family care. Board Discussion: Questions addressed wheelchair maneuverability and impervious coverage. The applicant agreed to revise the bathroom layout for ADA compliance and install a ramp. Outcome: Motion to approve with conditions (handicap-accessible bathroom and ramp). Unanimous approval (7-0). The board commended the family’s efforts. Case Z4-2026: Solomon Afuah – 95 Bernard Street Variances: Front yard setback (proposed 23.3 ft, required 25 ft), one side yard setback (6.37 ft vs. 12 ft), total both side yards (12.31 ft vs. 18 ft). Property is in the RB zone. Applicant: Solomon Afuah, seeking to build an attached garage for vehicle storage, convenience, safety, and cost savings (20% less than detached). He noted similar attached garages in the neighborhood. Testimony: Applicant explained the benefits of an attached garage, including convenience in bad weather, security, and ease of snow removal. Public Comments: None. Outcome: Motion to approve, noting the request is de minimis and not detrimental. Unanimous approval (7-0). Executive Session - The board entered executive session for case Z53-2019 (American Outdoor at 737 New Derham Ave.) and later returned to public session. No action was reported. Adjournment - The meeting was adjourned by unanimous vote.

This special meeting of the Edison Township Planning Board was held on March 30, 2026, to present and consider the fair share housing element of the master plan, including updates resulting from the fourth round COAH obligations. The meeting included a presentation by Township Attorney Christopher Zingaro and Affordable Housing Planner Jennifer Beam, public comment, and a unanimous board vote to approve the plan as amended. The plan addresses the municipality's affordable housing obligations for the 2025-2035 compliance period. Public Comments & Testimony - Ron Loffler (6 Nancy Circle, Edison) requested that the board ask planners to revise the ADU (Accessory Dwelling Unit) portion of the plan (pages 29-30) to allow ADUs in the RB and Rouble B zones, not just the RA zones, arguing that the restriction would be inequitable and limit aging-in-place opportunities for half the town. He stated that if the plan moves to the governing body, he would present the request for expanded zoning. Board members noted that ADUs under the plan must be deed-restricted and tenants selected through a lottery, not by the property owner, which could limit homeowner interest. Planner Jennifer Beam agreed that the program has had limited success but remains a satisfactory mechanism for credit. Discussion Items - Presentation on Fourth Round Obligation: Attorney Christopher Zingaro explained that the Department of Community Affairs established a fourth round obligation of 727 units for Edison, but a Vacant Land Adjustment (VLA) analysis conducted by planner Jennifer Beam reduced the realistic development potential (RDP) to 231 units. An additional 610-unit carryover from the third round settlement (from a total 2,530 third-round obligation) was also addressed. The remaining 496 units (727 minus 231) plus the 610 carryover create an unmet need of 1,106 units, which must be addressed through mechanisms rather than mandatory construction. - Rehabilitation Obligation: Beam noted a rehab obligation of 637 units, which Edison meets through an existing program funded by the trust fund. Loans are forgiven if homeowners stay for 10 years. - Projects to Meet RDP: Three projects provide credits: Al Firi (near Metro Park station) – 262 affordable units plus 131.2 bonus credits (0.5:1 transit bonus); Blueberry Village (Plainfield Avenue) – 27 affordable units; and MM (originally 42 affordable units, corrected to 50 on the record). Total credits after correction: 470.6, which easily covers the 231 RDP. - Surplus and Unmet Need: The 470.6 credits against 231 RDP produce 239.6 surplus. Additional mechanisms – Menlo Manor (239 age‑restricted units), gut rehab of Robert and Holmes Gardens (92 units), 39 Thomas Place (13 age‑restricted), and Fairway Country Club (51 age‑restricted) – add 395 total credits, raising the surplus to 634.6. This surplus is applied first to the 610-unit third‑round carryover, leaving 24.6 credits toward the fourth‑round unmet need of 496 units. Remaining unmet need is addressed through a market‑to‑affordable program (102 units left), public‑private partnerships, and an accessory dwelling unit program. - Extension of Controls: Beam explained that extending deed restrictions on existing affordable units (typically for‑sale) can generate surplus credits without new construction, though it requires homeowner agreement and trust fund expenditure. She recommended the administrative agent explore this for soon‑to‑expire units. - Future Rounds: Zingaro and Beam clarified that after this plan, the third‑round deficiency of 610 units was deferred to the fifth round (post‑2035) under the 2016 settlement. The current plan satisfies both third‑ and fourth‑round obligations, providing litigation immunity through 2035. Key Outcomes - Board Vote: The Planning Board unanimously (5-0) approved the housing element and fair share plan as proposed, with all amendments and numerical corrections made on the record (including the updated MM project count from 42 to 50 affordable units). The motion included a finding that the plan is consistent with the master plan. - Next Steps: The approved plan will be submitted to the Edison Township Council for endorsement, then to the Mount Laurel judge and special adjudicator for review and a judgment of compliance/repose, which would grant the township immunity from builders’ remedy litigation through 2035. - Public Request: The board noted the public request to expand ADU zoning and indicated it would be presented to the governing body when zoning changes are considered.

The Edison Township Council held its regular meeting on March 25, 2026, at 4:00 PM (time given in agenda reference). The meeting began with the Pledge of Allegiance, roll call (all seven council members present), and a notice of adequate posting. A fire department life‑saving award was presented, followed by approval of minutes, a public hearing on a street vacation ordinance, adoption of resolutions, and an extended public comment period. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: Approved minutes from the March 9, 2025 work session and the March 11, 2025 regular meeting (motion carried unanimously). - Consent Agenda Adoption: All resolutions listed under Section 9 were adopted as a block; no resolutions were pulled for separate discussion (unanimous seven‑to‑zero vote). Public Comments & Testimony - Ordinance for Vacation of Thomas Place – Several residents spoke in opposition: - Patty Sislack (22 Elmwood Avenue) described severe congestion, parking overflow, and safety concerns, arguing that 66 units would add about 132 cars to an already narrow street. She stated she had received no prior notice. - Elizabeth Conway (20 Netherwood Circle) said the proposed four‑story building is out of character with the surrounding single‑family homes and violates the master plan’s intent to preserve residential character. She expressed skepticism that planning board review would adequately consider residents. - Joseph Romano (Edison) noted that another nearby street is also slated for multi‑dwelling development and urged the council to reconsider. - Janice Casmar (33 Albert Avenue) called the project a “bad idea” due to traffic and aesthetic concerns. - Jingboxiao (30 Hour Avenue) stated the old hotel is in his backyard and complained about existing parking, safety, and lack of notification. - Resolution Comment (Playground Funding): Elizabeth Conway questioned Resolution 1650‑2026 for a $478,000 playground for America 250. Council Vice President Kentos explained it is a skate‑park‑adjacent playground for toddlers, purchased through an educational co‑op. The Business Administrator confirmed it is part of a larger family‑friendly complex. - Open Public Portion (after resolutions): - Michael Karpoff, attorney for Timberline Homeowners Association (129 homes), said the association has received no response to multiple letters since August 18, 2025, regarding flooding from Robinson’s Branch and a 1996 municipal services agreement. He asked for a point of contact. Council President Coyle apologized and promised direct follow‑up. - A Timberline board member added that the association spent $300,000 cleaning the creek internally but flooding now originates downstream, outside their control. - Anthony D’Ameron (Edison) warned of a national trend of copper theft from utility poles and praised the Edison Police Department for responding to his recent carjacking, noting the car was recovered and an arrest made. - Elizabeth Conway returned to ask about temporary budget transfers and the mayor’s budget timeline. The Business Administrator stated the 2026 budget is expected to be introduced at the second April meeting. Conway also raised concerns about multiple serious accidents on Inman Avenue and suggested lowering the speed limit from 40 mph. Council President Coyle said the public safety committee would review the issue. - “Benz from Edison” supported returning public comment time to six minutes and offered to help observe traffic conditions. Discussion Items - Ordinance for Vacation of Thomas Place (Final Adoption): Council President Coyle explained that the street vacation is a procedural step to allow a developer to create a proper turnaround for a redevelopment project on a long‑vacant motel site. He noted the area has been studied as in need of redevelopment since 2020, a redevelopment plan was adopted in 2024, and no application has yet been filed. The vacation itself does not approve any building. Council Vice President Kentos questioned ownership after vacation (reverts to adjoining properties) and confirmed that a deed‑restricted “snack shop” parcel is limited to parking. Councilmember Brusher expressed concern about flood impacts but deferred. The ordinance was adopted on a roll‑call vote: all seven council members voted yes. - Public Safety and Budget: Council members responded to public comments, promising follow‑up on Timberline flooding (with legal advice not to discuss specifics publicly) and noting that the administration is working on stormwater grants and coordination with the county for Inman Avenue improvements. Key Outcomes - Adopted Street Vacation Ordinance: Unanimous vote (7‑0) to vacate a portion of Thomas Place; the action reverts the street right‑of‑way to the adjoining property owner, enabling future redevelopment applications. - Adopted Consent Agenda: All resolutions (including expenditures, refunds, and department spending) approved unanimously. - Directed Follow‑up on Timberline HOA Issues: Council President Coyle pledged to connect the association with the appropriate administration and legal channels; a closed‑session discussion may be scheduled. - Budget Timeline Set: The 2026 municipal budget introduction is planned for the second April 2026 meeting. The school board’s preliminary 12% increase was noted as a separate concern. - Traffic and Public Safety Review: The council’s public safety committee will review speed limits on Inman Avenue and coordinate with the county on planned upgrades.

The Edison Township Zoning Board of Adjustment held a regular meeting on March 24, 2026, beginning at 7:00 p.m. in Council Chambers. The board considered four major applications, including a medical office building, a residential addition, a second-story addition on an undersized lot, and a new Taco Bell with drive-through. The meeting also included routine consent calendar items, announcements, and public testimony. All votes were unanimous, with one case continued. Consent Calendar - Resolution naming attorney: Unanimously approved Jordan Meiser Salmon Sprague and Seuser as the zoning board attorney. Roll call: all board members present voted yes. - Minutes of December 16, 2025 and January 27, 2026: Approved unanimously by roll call. - First resolution for adoption: Z13-2025, Lake View Renovations (denial): Approved unanimously (8 yes). - Resolution Z34-2025, Bargov Choksky (denial): Approved unanimously. - Resolution Z27-2025, Barat Sakaran (approval): Approved unanimously. - Resolution Z29-2025, Baroon Batia (approval): Approved unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Case Z34-2023 (106 James St – medical office): - Hanan Arshah (114 Outer Wall Road) spoke in strong support of Dr. Zubair, citing his character, dedication to patients, and the need for a local physician to reduce travel. - Pradeep Malhotra (James & Grove) expressed support, stating the doctor would be convenient for the community. - Case Z25-2025 (32 Parsonage Rd – Taco Bell): - Michael Petrulo (199 Evergreen Road) opposed the project, citing existing noise from trucks and revving engines, lack of parking on Mason Street, pedestrian safety, litter, and health concerns. He pleaded with the board not to approve. - Henry Albitides (27 Judson Street) raised concerns about floodgate float lights (since addressed), garbage litter, and requested garbage cans. He noted the applicant agreed to an 8.5-foot fence and noise mitigation. He was satisfied with the proposed measures. Discussion Items - Case Z34-2023 – Dr. Mohammed Zubair, 106 James Street: - Proposal: Demolish existing converted home and build a three-story medical office building (pulmonary and sleep medicine). Variances required for parking (20 spaces vs. 45 required), height (32.83 ft vs. 30 ft max), FAR (0.34 vs. 0.25 max), and front yard setback (32.2 ft vs. 35 ft). - Applicant’s attorney provided a detailed summary: The building design uses separate exam rooms to avoid communal waiting for contagious patients; sleep study floor operates evenings only three days a week; parking demand justified by low usage; police department found no concerns. Conditions included limiting third floor to sleep studies, lighting reduction at 10:30 p.m., security cameras, and landscaping. Board questions confirmed no change of use without returning to board. - Public portion opened; two speakers supported. Motion to close. Summation requested approval. - Vote: Unanimous approval (Mr. Dave motioned, seconded by Mr. Schneider). Conditions include those mentioned in testimony. - Case Z27-2025 – Bikash Sharma, 36 Rainford Road: - Proposal: Second-story addition and side addition to an existing single-family attached duplex in PRD zone. Only variance needed: side yard width 5.125 ft vs. 15 ft required. - Planner John Chadwick testified that the lot’s curved configuration creates a larger separation (50 ft) between homes; the addition is consistent with neighborhood where most homes are now two-story. No FAR issue for attached homes. - No public comments. Motion to approve (Mr. Dave) citing a de minimis request, not detrimental. Unanimous approval. - Case Z33-2025 – NHDP LLC, 136 Floyd Street: - Proposal: Second-story addition (no footprint expansion) to existing two-bedroom ranch on an 8,000 sq ft lot (zone requires 20,000 sq ft). FAR variance from 0.21 existing to 0.41 proposed. Numerous existing non-conformities. - Architect David Dugas and planner John DuPont testified. Board questioned whether existing sunroom conversion to bedroom was approved (unknown). Applicant initially willing to remove that bedroom, reducing FAR to 0.39; further board requests led to applicant offering to reduce FAR to 0.35 (matching nearby approvals) by reducing second-floor addition. Board requested revised floor plans. - Case continued to April 21, 2026, with notice that attendees will not receive a new notice. - Case Z25-2025 – Hazabel Northeast LLC (Taco Bell), 32 Parsonage Road: - Proposal: Demolish existing T-Mobile and construct a new Taco Bell with drive-through (a D1 use variance since drive-throughs are not permitted stand-alone in GBH zone). Also sought C variances for side setback (14 ft vs. 15), sign setback (8.8 ft vs. 15), and landscape buffer (4-15 ft vs. 20 ft). - Extensive testimony from engineer Brian Ennis, traffic engineer Gary Dean, and planner Matthew Flynn. Key points: building reduced by 285 sq ft to increase buffer to residential neighbors; 15 ft buffer with 8-ft fence and dense landscaping; queuing lane holds 9 cars, can hold up to 13 on-site; traffic study found adequate gaps; lighting zero fc at residential property line; deliveries by WB40 truck twice a week off-peak; hours: restaurant 7 am–midnight, drive-through until 2 am. County approval obtained. - Board questions: agreed to condition on garbage pickup between 6-8 am, not blocking barrier-free entrance during deliveries, added garbage cans, sprinkler system for landscaping. Board also discussed potential cut-through traffic and queuing capacity, but traffic engineer and board members felt conditions mitigated concerns. - Public opposed by one resident; another with specific concerns satisfied. Summation by applicant attorney. - Motion to approve with conditions as discussed. Unanimous approval. Key Outcomes - Z34-2023 (Zubair): Approved unanimously with conditions (limit third floor to sleep studies, lighting reduction at 10:30 p.m., building-mounted light, security cameras, landscaping). - Z27-2025 (Sharma): Approved unanimously. - Z33-2025 (NHDP): Continued to April 21, 2026 after applicant agreed to reduce FAR to 0.35; revised plans required. - Z25-2025 (Taco Bell): Approved unanimously with conditions: garbage pickup 6-8 a.m., no blocking barrier-free entrance during deliveries, installation of garbage cans, irrigation system for landscaping. - Announcement: Case Z24-2025 (Vivian Pereira, 1651 Woodland Avenue) continued to April 28, 2026.

The Edison Township Council convened its work session on Monday, March 23, 2026, at the municipal complex. Council President Joe Coyle presided. After the Pledge of Allegiance, roll call confirmed the presence of Councilmembers Brescher, Coyle, Dima, Kentos, Patel, Petil, and Schmuel. The Clerk stated that adequate notice of the meeting had been provided under the Open Public Meeting Act, with notice sent and posted on November 17, 2025. Council President Coyle reminded attendees that the work session would be followed by a public meeting and that speakers have four minutes for public comment. Consent Calendar - The council reviewed the minutes from the March 9 and March 11, 2026 meetings; no comments were offered. - Unfinished business: an ordinance authorizing the vacation of a portion of Thomas Place under N.J.S.A. 40:67-1 was listed for further consideration, public hearing, and final adoption later in the agenda; no council questions were raised on the ordinance itself during the work session. - Several department resolutions were reviewed without substantive comment, including Recreation item A, Police item A, and Township Clerk items A and B. Department Resolutions Reviewed - Business Administration item A: Council President Coyle asked about the duration; the response was a five-year renewal, compared with the previous 30-year term. - Finance items A through J were reviewed. Resolution J, rejecting all bids received for banking services, was noted for moving forward. - Department of Public Works items A through D: A question about the backhoe loader under item B was answered as being for snow plowing. Item D authorized the contract/purchase order for supply and installation of an American 250 playground (referenced as 470,000-0805) at the skate park behind the municipal building. Public Comments & Testimony - Janice Casmar, of 33 Albert Avenue, Edison, expressed strong opposition to proposed apartment buildings on Thomas Place, saying the project is "too big for that small area" and questioning where parking would go. She said existing parking spillover from Redfield Village already affects Elmwood Avenue and John Street, and described the proposal as "not feasible." - Council members clarified that the current agenda item was only a street vacation for Thomas Place, not site plan approval. They stated that a redevelopment plan exists for the area, but the property still must go before the Planning Board, where the public can comment on parking and density. Council members offered to provide Casmar with information about the Planning Board meeting, and noted she could also speak at Wednesday's council meeting. The public comment portion was closed by voice vote. Committee Reports - Councilmember Dima reported on the animal shelter for February 2026: 33 cat adoptions, 10 dog adoptions, one reclaimed cat, three reclaimed dogs; current shelter population was 18 dogs (including one on a seven-day hold), 50 cats (including four mothers nursing kittens), and holding placements of six dogs, four cats, and one cockatoo after the resident passed away. - Council Vice President Kentos said the open space committee met in March and thanked the administration for addressing squatting on open space. He noted his committee reports are available at robertkentos.com/committees. He plans to recommend applicants for the historic preservation commission and veterans committee, and noted environmental commission members need reappointment. - Council President Coyle reported that the DPW committee will reach out to directors about maintenance calendars for roads, parks, street cleaning, and repairs, and will schedule a meeting next month. Points of Light & Announcements - Council President Coyle was invited to speak at TEDx at JP Stevens by robotics student Mir Patel, and attended the Edison Recreation volleyball championship between Spike Six and Falcon Avengers. - Councilmembers recognized the Edison High School wrestling team, with close to half a dozen wrestlers qualifying for states; a resolution honoring them is expected. - Upcoming events: Easter Extravaganza on Saturday, March 28 from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. at the sports building, and Easter Sunday on April 5. Discussion Items - Councilmember Kentos asked about 2025 youth sports funding; the Business Administrator said it was not on the current agenda due to timing but would be placed on the next agenda. - Councilmember Patel raised pothole concerns, asking whether the township can proactively patrol and fill potholes rather than relying on AI software and resident reports. The Business Administrator said the township assesses roads daily and takes action when notified. Patel also asked about Kilmore/Kilmer Court, and was told it is a township right-of-way and is proposed for an upcoming paving project, with signal work expected to be completed in spring/early summer. - Stelton community updates: the Business Administrator said engineers are meeting weekly on design work, but a final recommendation is not ready; funding is limited and the next few weeks may bring more definition. Councilmembers asked for a timeline and schedule, including grant milestones; the administrator said grant funds require programming before the building is erected and would provide a grant timeline. Discussion also addressed the need to preserve the building's facade/shell because of the property's Rossi designation. - Councilmember Schmuel asked about Comcast road patches coming apart. The Business Administrator said an inspector would revisit the patches and, if they are in poor condition, Comcast would be sent back to address them; Comcast posts a bond. - Councilmember Brescher raised concerns about deteriorated utility patches, especially on Mount Pleasant, arguing Comcast should be held accountable for additional road damage caused by their neglected patching. The Business Administrator said he was meeting with Comcast to go over their patching plan after winter shutdown and would raise the accountability issue. - Council President Coyle urged inclusion of an economic development person in the budget, saying he would not vote for the budget unless it is included after two years of waiting; he suggested a part-time, shared-capacity, or consulting role. - Council President Coyle also requested a prepared discussion on sewer and water system maintenance, infrastructure needs, court-mandated fixes, and budget requests, with the water and sewer directors present, possibly at the April 6, 2026 work session. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken on agenda items during the work session; ordinances and resolutions will be acted upon in the public session that follows. - The public comment portion was closed by a voice vote, and the meeting was adjourned by voice vote. - The Business Administrator committed to placing 2025 youth sports funding on the next agenda, providing a Stelton grant/timeline schedule, reviewing Comcast patches, and discussing sewer/water maintenance planning with council. - Council directed follow-up on a potential construction manager/advisory role to guide township projects and on economic development staffing in the upcoming budget.