Public Meetings - Fort Worth, Texas

The Fort Worth City Council held a work session on Tuesday, April 28, 2026, from 9:00 AM to 10:18 AM, chaired by Mayor Pro Tem Flores (Mayor Parker arrived at 9:34 AM). The session included informal reports, a presentation from Trinity Metro, proposed economic development agreements, and requests for future agenda items. City Manager Report – Informal Reports - Text 311 Service (Sana Syed): The city launched a new text-based service for non-emergency requests (e.g., street conditions, park maintenance). Residents can text 817-311, and a bot handles the conversation. Response times mirror the existing app. A confirmation number is provided. The service is now active. - Solid Waste Collections (Jim Keezell): No questions were raised; the item was acknowledged. - Illegal Street Racing, Reckless Driving, and Street Takeover Activity (Deputy Chief Sean Kenjura): Kenjura reported that street racing activity has declined from the 2020–2023 peaks, shifting to isolated parking lot incidents. Recent actions included seizure and arrest of an organizer. The department coordinates with other Metroplex agencies. Regarding ATVs and dirt bikes, enforcement is handled less aggressively when dealing with minors, with a focus on education and parental involvement. An educational campaign is planned with the school district. Council member Martinez requested sharing materials. - Impact of SB 1008 and HB 2844 on Mobile Food Vending (Wyndie Turpen): The state (DSHS) is taking over mobile food vending regulation, but municipalities may contract to conduct inspections and permitting. Fort Worth had previously delegated authority to Tarrant County. The city is awaiting full regulations (expected May 1) to determine if it will seek a contract. Council members expressed concern about enforcement after hours and in residential areas. The city’s environmental services department remains the first point of contact for complaints. - Proposed Fee for Missed or Skipped Building Inspections (Evan Roberts): The proposed fee is $200 per hour for staff review of forensic engineering reports required when inspections are missed. Council member Hill criticized the proposal as insufficiently deterrent, especially for professional contractors. He requested a separate system for third-party contractors. The fee is intended to fill a gap in the current ordinance. Council member Hill also asked about unfinished projects; Roberts noted the city lacks tools to compel completion unless the structure becomes unsafe. A follow-up report on the permitting process was requested. Questions Regarding City Council M&C Log - Council member Nettles requested an update on M&C 26-0304 (HUD contract for small business capacity building). Jessica Rodgers, Economic Development Director, explained the program will help small contractors with bonding, insurance, and bidding. Ongoing reporting on KPIs will be provided. Nettles asked for checks and balances to track program participants who win city bids. Trinity Metro Updates on TexRail Extension and Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) - Richard Andreski (President/CEO) and Anette Landeros (Chief Strategy Officer) presented. TexRail has seen 15–20% compounded annual ridership growth, with 1 in 3 Fort Worth residents using the system annually. The Medical District extension (Mistletoe Boulevard) is fully funded and will break ground in late 2026, with service starting in 2029. The station will be built on donated land from Baylor Scott & White. Properties within walking distance of TexRail stations saw property values and sales tax revenue grow at twice the citywide average. Trinity Metro is conducting a TOD study focused on its stations and two bus terminals. - Council member Peoples asked about service in working-class neighborhoods (south, east, northside). Andreski cited recent route extensions, a future Lancaster Avenue rebuild, and a planned express bus from southeast Fort Worth to Alliance. New buses are being purchased annually. - Council member Hill asked about financial sustainability and farebox recovery. Andreski noted that five underperforming bus routes have been eliminated. Fares are simplified; a long-term possibility is higher airport fares. - Council member Beck asked about the line’s ultimate terminus. Landeros said the next phase aims to reach TCU, and discussions are underway with Tarleton State University, potentially creating a university line connecting UTA, Texas A&M, TCU, and Tarleton. - Council member Flores requested a follow-up on the schedule change that affected late-night DFW airport workers; Andreski agreed to re-evaluate ridership patterns. Flores also asked about FIFA World Cup plans; Landeros described enhanced shuttles on non-game days connecting key destinations (stockyards, downtown, botanic garden, zoo). - Mayor Parker requested that Trinity Metro and city staff collaborate with private transportation operators to increase senior transportation and reduce isolation. Proposed Economic Development Agreement with Celestica - Cherie Gordon (Economic Development Coordinator) presented. Celestica, an electronics manufacturer, proposes two sites at Alliance with a minimum capital investment of $876 million and 1,715 full-time jobs (average salary $75,000). The incentive is a 10-year, 80% tax abatement on real and business personal property, estimated at $41.7 million ($30.6 million NPV). The city’s participation is 3.5%, with a public-private ratio of 28.8:1. The project is cash-positive by year one. The abatement is subject to performance requirements, including a 30% local hiring goal and enhanced salary provisions. The company is competing with domestic and international locations. A representative from Celestica confirmed the urgency of the decision. The item will be considered at the May 12 council meeting. Proposed Economic Development Agreement with Marand - Marand U.S. Holdings (Australian aerospace/defense) proposes expanding from 15 to 150 employees at a new facility in southeast Fort Worth. Minimum capital investment: $31 million. Recommended 10-year, 50% tax abatement ($934,000 incentive, $685,570 NPV). The project is in active competition with other locations. The item will be considered at the May 12 council meeting. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken; all items are recommendations for future council action. - The council directed staff to provide follow-up reports on: - Permitting process and code changes for missed/skipped building inspections (Council member Hill). - Oversight of project managers selecting contractors for city projects (Council member Nettles). - Impact of SB 840 and SB 15 on zoning plans citywide (Council member Peoples). - Update on the Literacy Roundup and city literacy efforts (Mayor Parker). - The city will continue to evaluate contracting with DSHS for mobile food vending inspections, pending full regulations. - Trinity Metro will re-evaluate ridership patterns for the late-night DFW airport service and will collaborate on senior transportation initiatives.

The Research and Innovation Local Government Corporation (LGC) met on April 28, 2026, to approve meeting minutes, receive a financial briefing, and vote on four resolutions related to transitioning the Texas A&M Fort Worth downtown project and designating a bond signatory. All actions were approved unanimously. Consent Calendar - The board unanimously approved the minutes from the October 28 meeting. - A financial report briefing was presented; no questions were raised and it was accepted. Discussion Items - Roger presented three interrelated resolutions (Action Items A, B, and C) concerning the LGC's transition out of the Texas A&M Fort Worth downtown campus project: - Action Item A – Fourth Amendment to the Pre-Development Agreement: The original $1.9 million contract (cash funded by the university) was reduced because not all funds were needed. The amendment makes a final payment to the developer, terminates the agreement, and returns any remaining balance to the university. - Action Item B – First Amendment to the Design and Pre-Construction Services Agreement: The original $19.6 million contract was reduced to $12.7 million by eliminating unneeded items (insurance, bond insurance, contingencies, early electrical infrastructure orders). The amendment recognizes the final payment and terminates the agreement. - Action Item C – Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement between the LGC and Texas A&M University: Consolidates obligations from the two prior agreements, returns unspent funds to the university, assigns all design and construction documents to the university, and acknowledges the university's repayment of LGC-issued debt for pre-development and pre-construction work. - Final Action Item – A resolution authorizing the City of Fort Worth Assistant City Manager Dana Bergdoff as a signatory on the corporation's bond. Key Outcomes - Resolution A (Fourth Amendment to Pre-Development Agreement): Approved unanimously. - Resolution B (First Amendment to Design and Pre-Construction Services Agreement): Approved unanimously. - Resolution C (Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement): Approved unanimously. - Resolution D (Bond Signatory Authorization): Approved unanimously. - No future agenda items were requested; the meeting adjourned.

The Fort Worth Zoning Board of Adjustment met on April 27, 2026, to consider two variance requests. The board approved a parking variance for a historic property (Case BAC-26-010) and heard a presentation on a lot width variance for a vacant lot at 1910 Amanda Avenue (Case BAR-26-012). Discussion Items Case BAC-26-010 – Parking Variance for Historic Property The applicant requested a variance to formally recognize an existing non-conforming parking condition tied to a historic property. The applicant argued that the property's age, lot size, configuration, and historical development pattern make the variance appropriate, and that granting it would preserve the established character of the area without adversely affecting public health, safety, or welfare. Board members asked questions about the feasibility of tandem parking for employees and whether future changes in occupancy could increase parking demand. The applicant stated no plans to increase the number of occupants beyond current capacity. Case BAR-26-012 – Lot Width Variance at 1910 Amanda Avenue Staff presented a request for a variance to minimum lot width in the A-5 one-family residential district (required 50 feet, requested 43.05 feet) due to an encroachment issue from the neighboring property. The lot is vacant and located within the Stop Six overlay district. A previous building permit was withdrawn in June 2025. The applicant will need to replat to resolve the encroachment. No public testimony or board discussion was included in the provided transcript for this item. Key Outcomes - Case BAC-26-010 (Parking Variance): The board voted unanimously (11-0) to approve the variance as requested. The motion was made by board member Garza and seconded by board member Powell. All 11 members present voted in favor. - Case BAR-26-012 (Lot Width Variance): No action or vote was recorded in the provided transcript. The item was only presented by staff. (Note: No consent calendar items or public comments from non-applicants were present in the transcript.)

The Fort Worth Building Standards Commission met on April 27, 2026, beginning at 9:31 AM, to hear cases regarding substandard structures and nuisance abatement. The meeting included consideration of 10 residential cases, with 7 property owners or representatives appearing, and resulted in declarations, orders to repair/demolish, and civil penalties. The meeting recessed for lunch at 11:52 AM and reconvened briefly to adjourn. Consent Calendar - Minutes from March meeting: Motion to accept passed 10-0. - Evidentiary packet: Motion to accept passed 10-0. - Withdrawal of 12 cases: The following cases were withdrawn by motion (passed 10-0): HS 2650 (3204 Denman Street), HS 2652 (8608 Prairie Wind Trail), HS 2653 (4612 Shackleford Street), HS 2654 (3412 Autumn Drive), HS 2655 (6448 Regina Drive), ACP 2647 (2912 Rodeo Street), ACP 2651 (3416 Slade Boulevard), ACP 2655 (2607 Northwest 22nd Street), and amendments HS 2612 (4132 Sandage Avenue) and ACP 2633 (3429 Wade Avenue). A new case commercial was also removed from the preliminary agenda. Discussion Items - HS 2638 – 4701 South Riverside Drive: City staff reported the primary structure and three accessory structures were substandard and hazardous (collapsing brick wall, roof decay, animal waste, pool hazard, etc.). Owner’s son Toby Evans appeared, citing family illness and financial hardship, and requested 90 days to sell the property. Commission declared the structures substandard/hazardous and ordered repair or demolition within 60 days (motion carried 10-0). - ACP 2645 – 612 Timothy Drive: Nuisance abatement case for debris accumulation. Owner Brent Stone (son of owner) appeared, stated cleanup was about 65% complete, and requested 30 days. City staff confirmed progress. Commission ordered abatement within 30 days and imposed a civil penalty of $35 per day for 45 days (total $1,575) (10-0). - ACP 2650 – 2513 Wallace Street: Owner Willie Dimes appeared, claimed he was a veteran awaiting a home remodeling program, and requested 90 days. City staff reported little progress. Commission ordered abatement within 60 days and imposed a civil penalty of $100 per day for 45 days (total $4,500) (10-0). - HS 2649 – 3800 Ren Avenue: No owner appearance. City staff reported the primary structure was vacant, open, and substandard (accumulated trash, animal waste, unstable flooring). Commission declared the structure substandard/hazardous and ordered repair or demolition within 30 days (10-0). - HS 2651 – 4120 Cherokee Trail: No owner appearance (owner deceased). City staff reported widespread deterioration, roof openings, and debris. Commission declared the structure substandard/hazardous and ordered repair or demolition within 30 days (10-0). - ACP 2646 – 2408 Michael Street: No owner appearance. City staff reported the owner had a fractured hand but no measurable progress. Commission ordered abatement within 30 days and imposed a civil penalty of $100 per day for 45 days (total $4,500) (10-0). - ACP 2649 – 2324 Halbert Street: No owner appearance (owner deceased). City staff reported no progress. Commission ordered abatement within 30 days and assessed $0 civil penalty (10-0). - ACP 2652 – 3732 Slade Boulevard: No owner appearance. City staff reported no measurable progress. Commission ordered abatement within 30 days and imposed a civil penalty of $100 per day for 45 days (total $4,500) (10-0). - ACP 2653 – 9924 Osprey Drive: No owner appearance. City staff noted some progress and recommended a $1,125 penalty. Commission ordered abatement within 30 days and imposed a civil penalty of $25 per day for 45 days (total $1,125) (10-0). - ACP 2654 – 4525 Tri-Sale Drive: No owner appearance. City staff reported no measurable progress. Commission ordered abatement within 30 days and imposed a civil penalty of $100 per day for 45 days (total $4,500) (10-0). Key Outcomes - All 10 heard cases resulted in declarations of substandard/hazardous (for new residential cases) or orders to abate nuisances (for administrative civil penalty cases). - Orders for repair/demolition were set at 30–60 days, and abatement orders at 30 days. - Civil penalties ranged from $0 (deceased owner) to $4,500, calculated as daily amounts over 45 days. - Owners were informed of the right to request amendments or appeal to Tarrant County District Court within 30 days. - The commission will next meet on May 18, 2026 (adjusted due to Memorial Day).

The Urban Design Commission (UDC) convened on Thursday, April 16, 2026, at 9:30 AM. All nine commissioners were present: Vice Chair Benner, Commissioners Carr, DeBose, Halliday, Harrier, Ramsey, Reed, Sanchez, and West. Staff included Anna Alvarez, Jefferson Prado Ortiz, Laura Young, Jacqueline Ingram, Brendan Utterback, Enrique Alvarez, Inca Rever, Chris Austria, and Joseph Laws. The meeting covered elections, announcements, approval of minutes, and 10 cases, including zoning recommendations, signage, and design waivers. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The minutes from the March 19, 2026, UDC meeting were approved unanimously (9-0). - Administrative Withdrawal: Case UDC 2026-040 (previously at the bottom of the agenda) was withdrawn administratively because revised plans eliminated the need for a waiver. Public Comments & Testimony - UDC 2026-045 (Camp Bowie signage): Tara Chisholm, co-owner of Sloan Beauty Bar, spoke in favor of the requested waivers, noting the tenant space lacks street frontage and that the awning sign was critical for visibility. Seven letters of support were submitted; one letter opposed the waivers (from CNIC Fort Worth). - UDC 2026-021 (Barry Stall Cup QSRs): No public testimony was offered in favor or opposition. - UDC 2026-042 (Lake Arlington warehouse): Brandon Bajanick (owner) and Front Clark (architect) spoke in favor of the waivers, citing the building's poor condition and the difficulty of meeting mixed-use standards on a highway frontage. Discussion Items - Election of Chair and Vice Chair: Following the resignation of former Chair Harper, Commissioner Benner was elected Chair (9-0), and Commissioner Ramsey was elected Vice Chair (9-0). - Staff Announcement: Planner Ana Alvarez is transitioning to the Economic Development Department after four years of service. - Case UDC 2026-087: Amendment to an urban forestry permit for a Northwest ISD school campus (11600 North Freeway). The applicant sought to change the tree canopy coverage requirement from square feet to a percentage of NUFA (30.6%). Staff recommended approval, noting that the revised NUFA resulted in 30.8% coverage. The commission approved unanimously (9-0). - Case UDC 2026-089 (40-foot fireplace chimney): Certificate of appropriateness for a 40-foot-tall freestanding fireplace chimney in the MU-2 district (West Bend area). Staff recommended approval, citing alignment with the district's intent to encourage exceptional design and public-realm engagement. Approved unanimously (9-0). - Case UDC 2026-022 (Stockyards temporary parking lot): Request for a transitional parking lot (377 spaces) with three waivers (parking room size, tree canopy, perimeter planting). The site is split-zoned (historic core and transition) and will serve as interim use while a hotel is planned. Staff recommended approval; the applicant confirmed on-site security and management. Approved unanimously (9-0). - Case UDC 2026-080 (Right-of-way vacation): Request to vacate 1,400 square feet of right-of-way at Curry and Weisenberger Streets to align property lines for future townhome development. Staff recommended approval. Approved unanimously (9-0). - Case UDC 2026-053 (Pennsylvania Avenue signage): Two waivers: (1) allow aluminum background and sign depth less than 6 inches; (2) allow wall signs on east and west elevations without public entrances. Staff recommended denial of both. After discussion, the commission approved the first waiver with a condition of 1.5-inch minimum depth (9-0) and denied the second waiver (9-0). - Case UDC 2026-088 (Lipscomb monument signs): Request for two monument signs at a historic fire station community center, including electronic changeable copy. Staff recommended approval of the monument signs but denial of the electronic changeable copy. After public comment from Near Southside (supportive of both), the commission voted to approve the monument signs and deny the recommendation to the Board of Adjustment for electronic copy (6-3). - Case UDC 2026-050 (Circle Park adaptive reuse): Request to rezone from CF to PDUR for a senior affordable housing development (adaptive reuse of a former church). Three waivers sought: zero-foot rear setback, 93 parking spaces (vs. 117 required), and shared street-level entries. Staff recommended approval. The applicant presented plans and noted community support. Approved unanimously (9-0). - Case UDC 2026-045 (Camp Bowie signage): Two waivers for an attached wall sign on a tenant space without street frontage (calculated at 32.25 sq. ft.). Staff recommended denial, citing concerns about visual clutter and the need for a comprehensive sign plan. The applicant argued that the sign was essential for business visibility and that no alternative pylon signage was available. The commission approved both waivers (8-0). - Case UDC 2026-021 (East Loop 820 QSRs): Request to rezone from MU1 to PDMU1 for three quick-service restaurants (including McDonald's) with eight development waivers. Staff recommended denial, noting inconsistency with the mixed-use intent and the urban village plan. The applicant highlighted constraints from TxDOT and floodplain issues. The motion to approve failed (3-5), resulting in a recommendation to deny. - Case UDC 2026-042 (East Loop 820 warehouse): Certificate of appropriateness for a warehouse rehabilitation with four waivers (fenestration <40%, street trees, pedestrian lights, canopy coverage 0%). Staff recommended denial, citing the property's rezoning to MU2 and the expectation of mixed-use development. The applicant noted the building's deterioration and lack of TxDOT response. The commission approved the waivers (8-0). Key Outcomes - Chair/Vice Chair: Commissioner Benner elected Chair, Commissioner Ramsey elected Vice Chair (both 9-0). - All 10 cases decided: - 8 cases approved (including 7 unanimous, 1 with 8-0, 1 with 6-3). - 1 case (Camp Bowie signage) was approved after staff recommended denial. - 1 case (East Loop 820 QSRs) was denied, resulting in a recommendation to deny to the Zoning Commission. - Next Steps: Several cases will proceed to the Zoning Commission, City Council, or Board of Adjustment as applicable. The next UDC meeting is scheduled for May 2026.

The Fort Worth Board of Adjustment convened on April 15, 2026, at 9:00 AM (local time) to hear and decide on 14 variance and special exception cases. The meeting, chaired by Whit Woolman, was attended by all 11 members, providing a full quorum. Staff presentations, public testimony, and board deliberations were conducted for each case. Decisions included approvals, denials, continuances, and a withdrawal. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes (March 18, 2026): Approved unanimously (11-0). Public Comments & Testimony - BAR-26-010 (Mount Hormway): Applicant stated the lot width reduction resulted from a required street dedication. No opposition. - BAR-26-011 (Dallas Avenue): Applicant, Eric Martinez, supported the parking variance to preserve trees and fit duplex on lot. Opposition letter cited concerns about spillover parking and speeding. Applicant chose not to consider plan modifications. - BAC-26-005 (Basswood Boulevard): Applicant explained the sign rebranding and ECC request. Opposition letter from Scenic Fort Worth raised distraction concerns. - BAC-26-006 (Lancaster Avenue): Applicant, Javier Bedrasa, cited homeless activity and city cleanup notices as reason for fence. Six opposition letters cited aesthetics and blocked views. One neighbor supported. - BAC-26-011 (Camp Bowie Boulevard): Applicant argued dumpster location was optimal due to lot shape. No opposition. - BAR-26-021 (Patent Court): Applicant and homeowner (Ashlyn Lawson) emphasized need for storage, security, and family space. Three letters of support; no opposition. - BAR-26-016 (Edgefield Road): Applicant cited floodplain constraints and desire to avoid flood insurance. Six opposition letters; applicant noted some neighbors later supported. - BAR-26-025 (Arundel Avenue): Applicant explained addition needed to protect pecan tree and fit house design. No opposition; three neighbors signed support. - BAR-26-018 (Chateau Drive): Applicant cited need to secure two classic vehicles. Opposition (Lisa Ganser) detailed permit violations, misrepresentation, and harm to property value. Applicant rebutted that no fraud was intended. - BAR-26-020 (Stanhope Drive): Applicant explained that the existing pergola was approved by city, and a rain cover would not change green space or runoff. No opposition. - BAR-26-022 (Lisbon Street): Applicant built shed without permit; also faced parking issue due to former garage conversion. Several neighbors signed support. - BAR-26-023 (Turner Street): Applicant noted lot width is 50 ft vs. required 55 ft. No opposition. - BAR-26-017 (Balsize Terrace): Spanish-speaking applicant requested variance for 44 ft wide lot. No opposition. - BAR-26-024 (Trails Edge Road): Applicant (Tyler Mobley) sought garage extension and fence adjustments to match existing. Opposition (Reverend Ryan Wilkerson) raised sight-line and safety concerns; applicant later offered to reduce extension to 20 ft setback. - BAR-26-026 (Sky Lake Drive): Applicant cited four hardships (irregular lot, topography, floodplain, mature trees). Neighbors and HOA expressed support. Discussion Items - Announcements: Legal staff notified the board of four appealed cases (BAC-25-024, BAR-25-125, BAC-25-068, BAC-25-045) and reminded members to avoid discussing them. - BAR-26-010 (Lot Width Variance): The 41 ft width was caused by a required street dedication. Board found no opposition and approved unanimously. - BAR-26-011 (Parking Variance for Duplex): Board discussed options to narrow the structure or use side access; applicant refused. Motion to approve failed (1-10), resulting in denial with prejudice. - BAC-26-005 (ECC Sign): Board debated traffic confusion and sign visibility. Motion to continue for 30 days passed unanimously to allow applicant to provide more details. - BAC-26-006 (Fence on Vacant Lot): Board split on hardship. Variance A (fence without use) failed (6-5; needed 9 votes). Variance B (projected front yard) also failed (3-8). Both denied. - BAC-26-011 (Dumpster Enclosure): Board noted unique lot shape and minimal visibility. Approved 10-1. - BAR-26-021 (Garage & Patio Setbacks): Both variances approved: A (side setback) 10-1; B (rear setback) 9-2. - BAR-26-016 (Garage & Pool on Through Lot): Board recognized floodplain hardship and lack of rear yard. Approved 10-1. - BAR-26-025 (Front Yard Addition): Board accepted addition to protect pecan tree; approved unanimously. - BAR-26-018 (Second Detached Garage & Lot Coverage): Motion for variance A failed (5-6), then variance B also failed (5-6). Both denied. - BAR-26-020 (Pergola Size & Lot Coverage): Board found city error in approving plans. Both variances approved unanimously. - BAR-26-022 (Shed Size & Parking): Variance A (shed) approved unanimously. Variance B (parking) initially proposed for continuance, then substitute motion to approve passed 10-1. - BAR-26-023 (Lot Width): Approved unanimously. - BAR-26-017 (Lot Width): Approved unanimously. - BAR-26-024 (Garage Extension & Fence): Variance A amended to 20 ft setback and approved unanimously. Special exception B and variances C and D for fence approved unanimously. - BAR-26-026 (Front Setback & Garage Projection): Both variances approved unanimously. - BAC-25-067 (Withdrawal): Applicant withdrew; board accepted withdrawal, resulting in denial with prejudice. Key Outcomes - Approved: BAR-26-010, BAC-26-011 (Camp Bowie), BAR-26-021 (both variances), BAR-26-016, BAR-26-025, BAR-26-020 (both), BAR-26-022 (both), BAR-26-023, BAR-26-017, BAR-26-024 (amended and all), BAR-26-026 (both). - Denied: BAR-26-011 (with prejudice), BAC-26-006 (both variances A and B), BAR-26-018 (both variances A and B), BAC-25-067 (withdrawn, denial with prejudice). - Continued: BAC-26-005 (30-day continuance). - Vote Tallies: - BAR-26-011 denial: 1-10. - BAC-26-006 variance A: 6-5 (failed to achieve required 3/4 supermajority). - BAC-26-006 variance B: 3-8. - BAR-26-018 variance A: 5-6; variance B: 5-6. - All other approvals had strong majorities, often unanimous or near-unanimous. - Next Steps: Applicants for denied cases may appeal to district court within 10 days. Approved applicants must work with city staff to finalize permits. The continued case (BAC-26-005) will return in 30 days.

On Monday, April 13, 2026, the City of Fort Worth held a town hall meeting at the Diamond Hill Jarvis Community Center to present and answer questions about the proposed 2026 bond program and charter amendments. Mayor Pro Tem Carlos Flores (District 2) opened the meeting, emphasizing the city's fiscal responsibility and the bond's role in funding capital projects. The meeting included a pre-recorded video overview, presentations by April Rose Escamilla (registered civil engineer) and Assistant City Attorney Gavin Midgley, a question-and-answer session, and opportunities for one-on-one discussions with subject-matter experts. Bond Program Overview - The 2026 bond program totals $845 million (revised from an initial $840 million capacity after an additional $5 million became available in December 2025). - The bond is structured to stay within the existing city property tax rate (14.75 cents per $100 valuation allocated to debt service) and is planned to be repaid over 20 years without increasing that rate. - Voters will consider six lettered propositions (A through F) individually on the ballot. A sample ballot was provided. - State law now requires all bond ballot language to include the phrase "THIS IS A TAX INCREASE" in capital letters, but the city has structured the program so that no tax rate increase is anticipated. - Early voting runs from Monday, April 20, 2026, through Tuesday, April 28, 2026. Election Day is Saturday, May 2, 2026. Public Comments & Testimony - Speaker 1 (male resident): Raised several concerns: - Noted that Proposition G would effectively give council members a 100% pay raise (from $25,000 to $50,000) while the city is in a hiring freeze due to an anticipated deficit (FY26 freeze; raise would be effective FY27). - Questioned whether the $845 million bond figure includes interest; upon learning it does not, he calculated that at 6% interest the total cost would exceed $1.1 billion. - Cited the city's $230 million unassigned fund balance at the end of fiscal 2025 and $84 million in interest and dividend income since 2020, asking why those funds aren't used instead of borrowing. He noted that city council changed the policy in August 2025 to pull $12 million of interest/dividend funds into the general reserve and used $2 million for city hall renovations, arguing council could change policy again to provide tax relief. He asked Councilman Flores to commit to bringing up a policy change at the next council meeting. - Speaker 2 (male resident): Expressed concern about borrowing money for public art (up to 1–2% per proposition as per the public art ordinance). He argued that the interest paid on borrowed art funds (estimated at about $13 million total) could be better used for other city needs. Staff noted the public art ordinance is set for the 2026 bond program and encouraged discussion with council members. - Additional speaker: Asked whether corporate naming rights have been considered for the animal shelter (Proposition F). Brian Docker (Code Compliance Director, overseeing animal care) confirmed that naming rights and donations (e.g., benches, bricks) are being explored and that the shelter design allows for future expansion using such funding. Discussion Items - Proposition Details: April Rose Escamilla presented the six propositions: - A – Streets & Mobility Infrastructure: $511,480,700 for major roadways ($328 million for street rehabilitation), intersections, sidewalks, bridges, traffic signals, and safety improvements near schools. - B – Parks, Recreation & Open Space: $185,140,000 for aquatic facilities, athletic complexes, botanic gardens, community parks, Fort Worth Zoo utilities, golf courses, gateway park, water gardens, and open space (now included in this proposition). - C – Public Libraries: $14,586,000 for relocation of the Fort Worth History Center, renovation of Southwest Regional Library and Diamond Hill Jarvis Library. - D – Affordable Housing: $10,000,000 (increased from $5 million after council discussion) for land acquisition, construction of affordable housing, infrastructure, home repair programs, and loans/grants for households up to 120% AMI. - E – Police, Fire & Emergency Communications: $63,919,300 for new Fire Station 46 (Southwest Fort Worth), a new emergency communication center, and rebuilding Fire Station 40 (Northwest Fort Worth). - F – Animal Care & Shelter Improvements: $59,874,000 for construction and equipping of a new shelter to replace the Chuck and Brenda Silcox Animal Care and Adoption Center. - Charter Amendments (Propositions G–O): Assistant City Attorney Gavin Midgley explained each: - G – Mayor and Council Pay: Increase mayor pay from $29,000 to $60,000 and council pay from $25,000 to $50,000, effective October 1, 2026 if approved. - H – Remove hearing requirements for department directors removed by city manager. - I – Remove redundant hearing requirements for council appointees (city manager, city attorney, city auditor, city secretary, municipal court judges). - J – Remove separate meeting requirement for budget adoption (currently city holds a public hearing 15 minutes before adoption). - K – Remove annual report requirement for public service corporations (franchisees) from the charter, as state law preempts local regulation. - L – Remove ordinance requirement for granting of privilege (solid waste haulers); administrative approval could be used if applicants meet existing code requirements. - M – Remove ordinance requirement for city department reorganization; future departments created by city manager could be reorganized without council ordinance. - N – Align election timelines with state law to resolve conflicts between charter and Texas Election Code regarding special elections to fill vacancies. - O – Modernize language for payment of claims by replacing "purchase order" with "appropriate written documentation" to cover items like court judgments. - Community Engagement Numbers: The bond development process included 18,220 website views, 260 residents at 11 council district meetings, 1,109 YouTube views, 177 Balancing Act submissions, and 329 submitted comments (141 in-person/email, 188 from Balancing Act). Key Outcomes - The city will continue public education on the bond and charter amendments through two additional town halls (one online, one in-person) before the May 2 election. - City council will consider the public art funding ordinance later in April 2026. - Councilman Flores acknowledged ongoing discussions about public art funding but did not commit to bringing a policy change on using interest/dividend funds for tax relief, as requested by a resident. - The bond and charter election will be held on May 2, 2026, with early voting April 20–28, 2026.

On April 14, 2026, the City of Fort Worth held a public education meeting at a community center to inform residents about the proposed 2026 Bond Program and nine charter amendments on the May 2, 2026 special election ballot. The meeting, streamed live on YouTube, was led by Senior Capital Projects Officer Afor Rose Escomia, with presentations from City Manager Jay Chapa and Assistant City Attorney Trey Qualls. The bond package totals $845 million across six propositions (A–F), structured to avoid a property tax rate increase. Early voting runs April 20–28, 2026, and election day is May 2, 2026. Public Comments & Testimony - Rolando (resident/taxpayer) asked which schools are included in Proposition A’s traffic safety improvements. Staff clarified improvements focus on existing schools needing signalized intersections, pedestrian push buttons, and rectangular rapid flashing beacons, and that all schools (public, private, religious) are considered. - Dolores Connor (Historic Carver Heights Neighborhood Association) questioned plans for development of West Arlington Lake, noting the east side appears neglected compared to Arlington’s developed shoreline. Staff responded that the city recently acquired 200 acres adjacent to EUG McRae Park to preserve public shoreline, but no master plan exists yet. Connor expressed frustration with delays; staff and Parks assistant director Monique Hill acknowledged concerns and noted council member Peoples is pushing for improvements. - Unnamed resident asked what could drive a tax increase given the city’s “no anticipated increase” statement. City Manager Jay Chapa explained that the bond is designed to fit within the existing debt service tax rate (14.75¢ per $100 valuation) by paying off old bonds as new ones are issued. If the economy collapses, the city would stretch the program over more years rather than raise the tax rate. - Unnamed resident asked how the charter amendments were selected and why some (like H and M) are needed. Trey Qualls described them as mostly “clean-up” items to align with state law and remove redundancies. A follow-up exchange highlighted that Proposition H removes a hearing requirement for terminated department directors because the council cannot reinstate them, and the redundancy creates legal costs. - Unnamed resident (opposed to council pay raise) criticized Proposition G, stating council does not deserve a raise due to low attendance at meetings and high spending on community engagement staff. He declared he would vote “no” on the entire bond package “to send a message.” - Tara Moldanotto‑Wilson (nurse and city council candidate) spoke in favor of Proposition G, arguing that low pay prevents regular people from serving, and that independently wealthy council members may not feel financial pressures affecting constituents. - Unnamed resident asked about Proposition O (changing “purchase order” to “appropriate written documentation”). Chapa explained it stems from a past audit dispute; the update prevents legal challenges over outdated language and does not affect payment validity. - Unnamed resident asked how cost projections account for inflation and potential overruns. Chapa said each project includes inflation projections, and the city can reallocate savings from under-budget projects to cover overruns. Discussion Items - Bond Program Development & Engagement: Escomia outlined the process starting March 4, 2025, with a council proposal and city‑wide meetings October 20–November 17, 2025. Engagement statistics: 18,220 website views, 260 attendees across 11 district meetings, 1,109 YouTube views, 329 submitted comments (141 in‑person/email, 188 via Balancing Act). Council ordered the election on February 10, 2026, and added $5 million to Proposition D (affordable housing) from additional debt capacity, raising it to $10 million. - Bond Propositions: - A: $511.5 million for streets and mobility (12 major roadways, $328M for street rehabilitation, intersections, sidewalks, bridges, school safety). - B: $185.14 million for parks, recreation, and open space (aquatic facilities, athletic complexes, botanic garden, community centers, trails, land acquisition). - C: $14.586 million for public libraries (remodeling Southwest Regional, Diamond Hill Jarvis, and relocating Fort Worth History Center). - D: $10 million for affordable housing (land acquisition, construction, home repair programs, loans/grants, targeting households up to 120% AMI). - E: $63.9193 million for police/fire/emergency communications (new fire stations 46 and 40, new emergency communications center). - F: $59.874 million for animal care (new shelter with expanded veterinary, modern kennels, natural light, play yards). - Public art funding: up to 1% for Prop A, 2% for B, C, E, F, and 0% for D (consistent with ordinance update). - Bond Mechanics: Chapa explained the city property tax rate of 67¢ per $100 valuation: 52.25¢ for operations, 14.75¢ for debt service. Bonds are general obligation, repaid over 20 years without increasing the 14.75¢ rate. The city’s bond rating is AA+ (second highest); no defaults in history. - Charter Amendments (G–O): Trey Qualls presented each: - G: Increase council pay to $50,000 and mayor to $60,000 annually (from $25K/$29K), effective FY2027. - H: Remove requirement for terminated department directors to request a city council hearing (redundant; council cannot rehire). - I: Similarly remove hearing requirement for council‑appointed officers (city manager, city attorney, city auditor) after termination. - J: Allow budget adoption on the same day as the budget hearing (currently requires separate meeting). - K: Remove requirement for public service corporations (franchise utilities) to file annual reports with the city (redundant with state filings). - L: Allow designated staff to administratively approve grants of privilege (e.g., solid waste haulers) instead of requiring council ordinances each time. - M: Allow city manager to reorganize departments not created by charter or ordinance, without council action. - N: Align city charter vacancy‑election deadlines with state election code. - O: Replace “purchase order” with “appropriate written documentation” for debt payments (to reflect modern payment methods). - Sample Ballot: Escomia displayed the sample ballot, noting the state‑mandated “THIS IS A TAX INCREASE” language despite the city’s plan for no increase. Key Outcomes - No votes were taken; the meeting was purely educational. - Three additional citywide bond and charter education meetings are scheduled through April 18, 2026. - Early voting begins April 20, 2026; election day is May 2, 2026. - Residents were encouraged to review the bond book (available at FortWorthTexas.gov/2026bond) and charter materials (FortWorthTexas.gov/2026charter), and to contact their council members with feedback. - Staff committed to following up with Dolores Connor on West Arlington Lake planning and to connect her with relevant corridor study contacts.

This public education meeting, held at the Southwest Community Center, provided an overview of the proposed $845 million 2026 bond program and 10 charter amendment propositions for the May 2, 2026 election. City staff presented details on each proposition, answered questions, and clarified that the bond package is structured to avoid increasing the city's property tax rate. No votes were taken; the session was informational. Public Comments & Testimony - A resident questioned the bond financing structure, comparing it to a "maxed out credit card" and expressing concern about ongoing debt. He also criticized council attendance and pay raise proposition G, arguing pay increases could reduce the integrity of the job. - Another resident, working in banking, raised concerns about the cost of borrowing for Proposition D (affordable housing) and asked what would happen if voters rejected the bonds. He questioned the necessity of maintaining the debt service tax rate. - A speaker asked when council and mayor pay were last increased. Staff responded that the last increase was in 2006. - A resident asked about the city's reliance on residential vs. commercial taxes and how the city recruits businesses without giving away too many incentives. Assistant City Manager Dana Burghdoff explained the city's economic development incentive policy and noted that Fort Worth turns down 95% of incentive requests. - The same speaker also raised concerns about the prevalence of car washes, liquor stores, and vape shops in new developments, asking how zoning is determined. Staff clarified that the city cannot dictate specific retail types but can regulate alcohol sales. - A resident expressed concern about accountability and potential fraud in Proposition D (affordable housing), noting a lack of specific projects. Neighborhood Services Director Casey Thomas stated that specific projects are not identified yet due to changing market conditions, and funds would be awarded through a competitive process with public reporting. - A speaker asked whether developers pay for damage caused by construction trucks, referencing a broken water main on her street. Staff confirmed that impact fees are charged and that the city pursues claims against contractors when liable. - A resident voiced support for the bond propositions, especially Proposition B (parks, recreation, and open space), noting past improvements and the ability to leverage private partnerships. He encouraged others to vote for the bond. - A speaker asked about the timeline for the new animal shelter under Proposition F. Code Compliance Director Brian Smith said land acquisition and construction would start within one to two years after bond sale, with planning already underway. - A resident asked about auditing and compliance for affordable housing funds. Casey Thomas and Dana Burghdoff explained that contracts require city council approval (public hearings), internal audit (separate from city manager), external annual audits, and the city council serves as the board of the Housing Finance Corporation. - A speaker expressed opposition to incentives for data centers, specifically referencing a proposed $18 million abatement for a data center near I-20 and 2871, arguing data centers would come anyway and that the city should regulate their placement. Burghdoff agreed the issue needs revisiting. - A resident questioned Proposition N, which aligns vacancy timelines with state election law. She worried that a vacancy after the November election could leave a seat open for up to six months. Assistant City Attorney Gavin Midgley explained that state law sets the next available election date and that the charter cannot override state law; holdover provisions can reduce the gap. Discussion Items - April Rose Escamia (Senior Capital Projects Officer, Fort Worth Lab) presented the 2026 bond program. She reviewed the development timeline (starting March 2025), community engagement numbers (1,109 YouTube views), and the six propositions: - Proposition A ($511.48 million): Streets and mobility infrastructure. - Proposition B ($185.14 million): Parks, recreation, and open space. - Proposition C ($14.586 million): Public library improvements. - Proposition D ($10 million): Affordable housing initiatives. - Proposition E ($63.9 million): Police, fire, and emergency communications facilities. - Proposition F ($59.874 million): Animal care and shelter improvements. - Escamia explained that the bond package is designed to fit within the existing 14.75-cent debt service tax rate by using capacity from retiring bonds. She noted a state-mandated statement on ballots that the bond is "a tax increase," but the city's structure avoids an actual rate increase. - Gavin Midgley (Assistant City Attorney) presented 10 charter amendment propositions (G–O), simplifying or modernizing various city charter provisions: - Proposition G: Increase mayor pay from $29,000 to $60,000 and council pay from $25,000 to $50,000. - Proposition H: Remove department director hearing requirements. - Proposition I: Remove redundant hearing requirements for council appointees. - Proposition J: Remove separate budget hearing requirement. - Proposition K: Remove annual reporting requirements for public service corporations. - Proposition L: Remove ordinance requirement for granting of privilege. - Proposition M: Remove ordinance requirement for city department reorganization. - Proposition N: Align vacancy timelines with election code. - Proposition O: Modernize language documentation requirements for paying claims. - Staff answered various questions about bond financing, debt capacity, project readiness, and transparency. Alex Loffer (Assistant Finance Director) and Dana Burghdoff (Assistant City Manager) provided additional details on tax rate stability and economic development. Key Outcomes - No formal votes or decisions were made; the meeting was an education session. - Early voting for the May 2, 2026 election runs from April 20 to April 28, 2026. The last day to register to vote was April 2, 2026. - Additional education meetings will be held through April 18, 2026. - Staff committed to providing public tracking of bond project expenditures on the city website.