Public Meetings - Fresno, California

The Tower District Specific Plan Implementation Committee met on March 19, 2026, at 9:15 a.m. UTC. Roll call confirmed all members present: Chair Chris Johnson (virtual), Vice Chair Janae Conley, Michael Birdsaw (virtual), Myra Koble, James Kitch, and Joseph Catania. The committee approved its agenda and consent calendar, received training on the Design Standards and Guidelines, elected 2026 officers, and reviewed two project applications. It also heard public comment about a proposed cell tower and about the GraceBound project. Consent Calendar - The agenda was approved by voice vote without opposition. - The consent calendar, consisting of the meeting minutes, was moved by Myra Koble, seconded, and approved by voice vote. No items were pulled. Public Comments & Testimony - A Southeast Fresno resident spoke during the GraceBound item and expressed support for the transitional housing idea, but urged GraceBound to include trained staff, Narcan/CPR capability, mental-health de-escalation skills, and strong connections to referral services. He also said Fresno lacks enough permanent housing for people leaving transitional programs. Keith, a GraceBound representative, responded that GraceBound works with 40 to 80 people at its Tuesday meals, will provide security inside and outside, and plans to help create permanent housing in its larger vision. - Jessica Moni spoke during unscheduled communications and raised concerns about a cell tower proposed on property owned by Chair Chris Johnson at the corner of Olive and Fulton/Van Ness. She said she had not received responses from the District 3 review committee or the council office, questioned why the project appeared to bypass this committee, and urged members to be mindful of ethics and Brown Act obligations. Staff and committee members clarified that Chris Johnson had recused himself from that project, the project went directly to the Planning Commission because of federal timelines, the previous design review committee reviewed it once but did not make a recommendation because a second meeting did not occur, and the applicant pulled the item from the Planning Commission agenda, so the project will return to the Planning Commission rather than this committee. Design Standards and Guidelines Workshop - Matt Tacker and Dan of WRT presented a training on applying the Design Standards and Guidelines. They explained that the update partly responds to state law allowing ministerial review for certain affordable housing projects, which requires objective checklist language and cross-references to the Development Code. - They demonstrated the review process using three real projects. Casa del Mar, a single-family renovation in the RS5 district, showed how to check use, site design, cladding, windows, and the craftsman architectural style; some items were not applicable, and the window recess detail could not be determined from the plans. - A multifamily example in the Commercial Main Street zone was reviewed under the multifamily chapter because it was residential-only. Ground-floor residential was not permitted by right outside the apartment housing overlay, so the project would require an exception and would not qualify for ministerial review. The example highlighted parking access, direct pedestrian paths, facade articulation, natural ventilation, and a required 200-word architectural style statement. Future submittal requirements will include context photographs as well. - A commercial mixed-use example showed the Commercial Main Street sign standards, including the Tower District prohibition on internally illuminated signs. The sign on the example did not conform; raised lettering with external illumination would have conformed. The consultant also noted that a bookstore about 20 feet deep did not meet the 30-foot storefront depth standard, and suggested reviewing such standards over time as a living document. - The committee requested a copy of the training presentation; staff said staff and committee members would receive copies, and a longer developer-oriented version is also available. Election of 2026 Officers - Janae Conley announced she would step down as vice chair. Annie was nominated and elected vice chair for 2026. - Chris Johnson was re-elected chair for 2026. Both elections were by voice vote with no stated opposition. Project Review: Florida Street Parking Lot Expansion - A representative for the applicant said the parking lot expansion was approved in 2007 but the approvals expired after the church deferred it because of funding. Funding is now available, and the project would expand the existing grass/open space area into parking for parishioners and members. - The applicant said the project would provide additional parking and, after reconfiguring existing stalls, would gain a net total of 69 stalls. The existing wrought-iron fence would be removed, about a 9-foot landscaped strip would be provided along the front, and trees would be planted in the lot, including Chinese pistache and smaller trees. - In response to committee questions, the applicant said the plans include 10-foot landscape buffers along adjacent residential property lines, added shielding on parking lot lights to reduce glare toward residences, and temporary shoulder closures and construction noise during the work. Joseph Catania asked about impacts; Michael Birdsaw said the project reinforced the need for creative green space in the Tower District. - A motion to recommend approval was made, and the committee voted to recommend approval. Project Review: GraceBound 402 North Broadway - Vincent Blasters, designer, and Keith, a GraceBound representative, presented revised plans. The original plan had bedrooms facing Broadway; after staff advised that the ordinance does not allow a bedroom/caretaker unit facing Broadway, the revised plan moved the caretaker unit to the rear and expanded the thrift store frontage across the Broadway side. The three-story transitional housing component is being separated into a future application. - The current proposal covers the 402 North Broadway building: expanding the thrift store/furniture display in the front and adding a small caretaker studio of about 132 square feet of new construction attached to the rear, after removing an illegal structure behind the building. GraceBound described existing uses on adjacent properties, including a thrift store, restrooms, a free clothing room, and a community center that serves meals and services. - Keith described the future phase as a three-story building with a warming/cooling center capped around 20 people and about 30 transitional housing beds on the upper floors, plus 24/7 supervision. Drug and alcohol treatment would not be provided on site but through referrals. GraceBound is part of the Continuum of Care and has received grants, but current operations are primarily privately funded. - Ashley Atkinson, assistant director, said the building will be reviewed for historic compatibility during planning even though it is not individually designated; the proposed front window changes, including new windows, will be part of that review. - After the vote, Myra Koble questioned why the committee had not walked through the design guidelines checklist for this project. Staff acknowledged the committee just took over this review responsibility and set up a process for follow-up comments to be submitted while the application is within its 30-day planning review timeline. The committee agreed to provide additional written design comments, and the motion to recommend approval had already passed. Key Outcomes - Agenda and consent calendar approved; no items were pulled from the consent calendar. - 2026 officers elected: Chris Johnson as chair and Annie as vice chair. - The committee recommended approval of the Florida Street parking lot expansion. - The committee recommended approval of the GraceBound caretaker/thrift-store proposal and agreed to follow up with additional design comments; the three-story transitional housing phase will return separately for review. - The proposed cell tower project will not come to this committee; it will return to the Planning Commission after the applicant requested it be pulled from the prior Planning Commission agenda.

The Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission (PRAC) held its regular meeting on Monday, March 16, 2026, at 5:35 PM in Council Chambers. Seven commissioners were present (Chair McCoy, Vice Chair Ward, Commissioners Barraza, Caglia, Duran, Miller, Trillo); Commissioners Kucharski and Dohlin were excused. The meeting included a workshop on the Expanded Access to Arts and Culture (EAAC) Grant Program, hearings on a position authorization resolution and a new subcommittee, and public input on Measure P allocations, the Parks Master Plan, and the department budget. Key actions included recommending three new staff positions to City Council and creating the EAAC Subcommittee. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The regular meeting minutes of January 26, 2026, and February 23, 2026, were approved unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Unscheduled Communication: Kiel Lopez-Schmidt (South Tower Community Land Trust) reported that Bradway Park was closed 40 minutes early by a private security guard, and that insurance requirements for Tower Porch Fest at Broadway Park created barriers for community use. - Hearing 12-A – PAR Amendment (Adding 3 Positions): Seven public speakers addressed the commission. Amy Kitchener (Alliance for California Traditional Arts) recommended creating a cultural affairs division with a professional director rather than the three proposed junior-level positions. Kiel Lopez-Schmidt expressed lack of confidence in the city’s grant processes and urged caution. Johannus Reijnders emphasized transparency and clear guidelines. Smiley (fiscally sponsored by Dulce Upfront) stressed the need for arts- and culture-focused positions. Ome (Dulce Upfront) invited staff to meet with artists directly. Hugo Morales (Radio Bilingüe) supported creating a cultural affairs director. Paula Allen (Arts Enrichment for All) questioned the structure and cost of the positions before a framework is in place. - Hearing 12-B – Creation of EAAC Subcommittee: Johannus Reijnders voiced strong support for the subcommittee contingent on public transparency and accessibility (in-person, Zoom, recorded). Hugo Morales reiterated support and requested that the PRAC chair also chair the subcommittee. - Hearing 12-C – EAAC Grant Program Public Input: Erin Burd (Arts Enrichment for All) reported no communication from the city and stressed urgency for grantees. Elizabeth Laval (Fresno City and County Historical Society) highlighted a bounced check, terminated contracts, inability to submit quarterly reports, and lack of access to the online reporting system. Johannus Reijnders called for transparency in the grant review process, stipends for panelists, and clear definitions of arts and culture. Jackson Kytle (San Joaquin Valley Town Hall) thanked the commission for handling the difficult transition. - Hearing 12-D – Measure P Allocations, Plans, Budget, CIP: Jesse Duran (Roeding Park Tennis Club) described deteriorating benches, signs, and windscreens, and slow responses to FresGo requests. Adam Balakian (community tennis facilitator) requested improved parking lot lighting, shade structures, and tree trimming on courts 1 and 2 at Roeding Park. Kiel Lopez-Schmidt noted the Tower District Specific Plan’s finding of inadequate park access and advocated for funding San Pablo Park and Ted C. Wills Center. Ome proposed mini-grants for alleyway beautification. Smiley reiterated the need for a senior arts director. Linda Scambray (Heritage Fresno) thanked the commission and raised concerns about public confidence in nonprofits. Micah Byers (arts educator) commented on randomness of grant awards and safety issues with restroom lighting at Roeding Park. Discussion Items - Measure P 5-Year Evaluation Subcommittee Report (Commissioner Barraza): The subcommittee has identified key areas for evaluation and received data from staff; work is accelerating to meet the deadline. - City Administration & PARCS Staff Reports (Director Aguirre): Recruitment underway for lifeguards, park supervisors, coordinators, and service aides to support spring and summer programs. Upcoming events: BMX state race at Woodward Park (March 22, 400 riders, 1,300–1,500 visitors), Easter celebration (April 5), and Camp Fresno youth registration (opens April 1). Also announced community meetings on March 24 and May 4 to discuss a proposed gymnasium at the Southeast Fresno sports complex (funding source to be confirmed). - Workshop – Update on EAAC Grant Program (Assistant Director McNab): Staff provided a timeline of actions since February 23: posting updates, City Council appropriation, emailing grantees, and bringing the position authorization resolution to PRAC. Next steps: continue reconciling records (210 hard copy folders, thousands of documents), hire staff after council approval, and log grantee inquiries. Commissioners Barraza, Ward, Caglia, and Trillo raised concerns about lack of updates between meetings, impacts on unpaid grantees, verification of bounced checks, and the need for arts and cultural expertise in new hires. - Hearing 12-A – PAR Amendment (Adding 3 Positions): The proposed positions (program administrator, community outreach specialist, community coordinator) would increase PARCS authorized FTEs from 164 to 167. Commissioners debated whether the job descriptions should require arts and culture background. Chair McCoy and Commissioner Barraza opposed the generic descriptions; others noted the need for both grant administration and arts expertise. The item was recommended to City Council. - Hearing 12-B – EAAC Subcommittee Creation: The resolution passed without additional discussion. Chair McCoy appointed herself, Vice Chair Ward, and Commissioner Trillo to the subcommittee. - Hearing 12-C & 12-D – Public Input Only: Commissioners took no action on these hearings. Key Outcomes - Approved the consent calendar (minutes of January 26 and February 23, 2026). (Unanimous) - Approved a motion to recommend to City Council adoption of the 3rd Amendment to Position Authorization Resolution No. 2025-178, adding three positions to the PARCS Department. (5-2; Chair McCoy and Commissioner Barraza opposed) - Approved a resolution creating the Expanded Access to Arts and Culture Subcommittee. (Unanimous) - Appointed the following commissioners to the EAAC Subcommittee: Chair McCoy, Vice Chair Ward, Commissioner Trillo. - Received public input on the EAAC Grant Program (Hearing 12-C) and on Measure P allocations, Parks Master Plan updates, Cultural Arts Plan, and annual PARCS Budget and Capital Improvement Plans (Hearing 12-D). No formal action taken. - Adjourned the meeting at 7:26 PM in memory of Dr. Francine Oputa.

The District 1 Project Review Committee met on March 4, 2026, to review a conditional use permit application for a parking lot expansion at the Shrine of St. Teresa Church, discuss administrative matters, and hear unscheduled communications on homelessness. Consent Calendar - Approved the draft minutes of the January 8, 2026 meeting. Public Comments & Testimony - A resident named Martin expressed concerns about the lack of community outreach for the parking lot project, stating that they had not heard of any community meeting. They questioned the need for 69 parking stalls without a building expansion, requested a formal traffic impact study, and noted that growth should occur in areas zoned for higher capacity. They also objected to the framing of development as a tool to displace homeless individuals. - During unscheduled communications, a community member (not identified by name) spoke about the homelessness crisis in District 1, highlighting a 48% rise in homelessness over five years, over 4,000 individuals sleeping on the streets, and the inadequacy of 90-day treatment programs. They called for more housing, sober villages, and services within the district, including for long-time residents. Discussion Items - Conditional Use Permit P25-02902 for Parking Lot Expansion at St. Teresa Church: The committee reviewed the proposal to expand an existing 16-stall parking lot to 69 stalls on a 0.59-acre site at 1363 North Maroa Avenue. The church's parish manager, D. Schultz, testified that the church has tripled in registration to approximately 1,500 families, that daily attendance exceeds 200 people, and that Sunday masses draw 450 people per service. She stated that the current parking (33 on-site + 16 existing) is insufficient, causing spillover onto neighborhood streets, and that the proposed expansion would alleviate congestion and safety issues. She also noted that the greenfield site is currently used for overflow parking and is a nuisance due to homeless activity. Committee members asked questions about traffic studies, parking calculations, and community outreach. Staff confirmed that no formal traffic study was completed but that a vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis showed below-threshold impacts. The existing conditional use permit from 2007 had expired. The committee discussed the need for a traffic study, proper sizing of the parking lot, and broader community outreach including to renters and businesses. Administrative Matters - The committee received information about Brown Act and procedural training via a video from the city attorney's office. The committee also clarified that appointments to the committee are made by the District 1 city council member, not the mayor. Key Outcomes - The committee recommended approval of the conditional use permit for the parking lot expansion, with the following caveats: (1) additional study of traffic and neighborhood impacts, (2) expanded neighborhood outreach to include not only property owners but also renters and businesses, (3) engagement with the district council member and planning commission to potentially right-size the number of stalls. The recommendation is non-binding and will be forwarded to the planning commission and city council. - The meeting was adjourned.

Fresno City Council Special Meeting: February 26, 2026 – Disposition, Financing, and Budget\n\nThe Fresno City Council held a special meeting on February 26, 2026, to consider an amended disposition and development agreement for the Park at South Stadium project, a TEFRA hearing for bond financing, an appeal of a development permit, and the mid-year budget review. The meeting also featured ceremonial proclamations for Dr. James Aldridge, Andrea Andrade, and Mike's Pizzeria's 64th anniversary. The special meeting was called to order at 10:30 AM and concluded at 11:24 AM, while the regular meeting continued until 4:43 PM.\n\n Ceremonial Presentations\n- Dr. James Aldridge Day: Proclamation declaring February 26, 2026 as Dr. James Aldridge Day, honoring the first and only Black city manager of Fresno. Presented by Councilmember Maxwell and Mayor Dyer. Family members spoke about his legacy.\n- Andrea Andrade Day: Proclamation recognizing cancer advocate and beauty queen Andrea Andrade, who passed away at age 35. Presented by Councilmember Vang and Mayor Dyer. Her husband Chris Wilson and brother spoke.\n- Mike's Pizzeria 64th Anniversary and Mike and Angelina Denuso Day: Proclamation for the family-owned restaurant founded in 1962 by Italian immigrants. Presented by Councilmember Perea, who also declared the day in honor of the founders.\n\n Public Comments & Testimony\n- 9:10 AM Hearing (Appeal): No public comments.\n- 9:15 AM TEFRA Hearing: Multiple speakers expressed concerns about the project, including lack of community meetings, affordability, and potential conflicts of interest. One speaker questioned the term "student housing" and the project's benefit to low-income residents.\n- Special Meeting (ID 26-272): Public comments included concerns about the revolving loan fund and a perceived conflict of interest involving the City Manager. One speaker urged a recount of accident data in Southwest Fresno.\n- Consent Calendar and Unscheduled Communication: A resident complained about unaddressed sidewalk issues leading to a neighbor's injury. Another sought reimbursement for a bike rack failure.\n\n Discussion Items\n- 9:10 AM Hearing – Appeal of Development Permit (P23-03606): Council considered an appeal by Councilmember Arias regarding a truck repair facility on North Avenue. The appellant resolved concerns, and the council modified the permit to allow 12 truck parking spaces (up from 9) and 12 passenger vehicle spaces (up from 6). The motion to deny the appeal and approve the permit passed unanimously.\n- 9:15 AM TEFRA Hearing – Student Housing Bond Financing: The council heard a request for $80 million in tax-exempt bonds for a mixed-income housing project (174 units, 70 affordable with a 55-year covenant) at 815-835 Fulton Street. Staff clarified the project is not student-specific but individual housing. The motion to approve passed 6-1.\n- Special Meeting – Amended Disposition and Development Agreement (ID 26-272): The council approved an amended agreement for the Park at South Stadium project, an $82 million investment for 174 units (70 affordable, 104 market rate). The project includes an $8 million revolving loan fund and $3.727 million in city funds. The Fresno Revitalization Corporation voted 8-0 to adopt, and the City Council voted 7-0 to approve.\n- Contested Consent – Item 2N (Uptown Apartments Financing): Approved without opposition after staff explanation of the revolving loan fund.\n- Contested Consent – Item 2T (School Zone Speed Limit Reduction): Resolution to reduce school zone speed limits from 25 to 20 mph citywide, in compliance with AB 382. Councilmember Esparza sponsored the item. Staff noted a sign-swap effort and no community opposition. The motion passed 7-0.\n- Mid-Year Budget Review (Item 3A): Edward Shinevere presented the FY2026 mid-year budget. Revenues are estimated at $506.1 million, with a net ending balance of $7.99 million after capital carryover and amendments. A projected $23.3 million deficit for FY2027 was noted. Council discussed fire department overtime (requested $1.56 million for attrition and $403,800 for a second drill school), casino revenue reductions due to state law, and attrition rates. The council approved the mid-year budget adjustments 5-0.\n\n Key Outcomes\n- Development permit appeal denied; permit approved with increased capacity limits.\n- TEFRA hearing concluded; $80 million bond issuance approved for mixed-income housing.\n- Amended Disposition and Development Agreement approved for Park at South Stadium project, advancing downtown housing.\n- School zone speed limit reduction to 20 mph approved citywide, to be implemented by next school year.\n- Mid-year budget adjustments approved, including $1.96 million for fire department overtime and drill school.\n- Special meeting adjourned at 11:24 AM; regular meeting adjourned at 4:43 PM.

The Fresno City Council held a regular meeting on Thursday, February 26, 2026, starting at 9:00 AM with roll call at 9:15 AM. The meeting included ceremonial proclamations, councilmember and mayor reports, a special meeting for a development agreement, two scheduled hearings, a consent calendar, contested consent items, and a mid-year budget presentation. Key actions included denial of an appeal for a truck repair shop with site‑plan modifications, approval of up to $80 million in tax‑exempt bonds for a mixed‑income housing project, adoption of resolutions supporting multiple housing developments, and a resolution to lower school‑zone speed limits to 20 mph. The city also approved a $1.96 million supplemental appropriation for fire department overtime and a second drill school, while the mid‑year budget review revealed an estimated $23.3 million deficit for fiscal year 2027. Consent Calendar - ID 26-218 – Minutes for February 19, 2026 approved. - ID 26-237 – Ordinance 2026-3 adopted (campaign contribution limits and filing methods). - ID 26-236 – Bill B-3 introduced (sidewalk vending time limits). - ID 26-190 – Second amendment to exclusive negotiating agreement with Fresno Chaffee Zoo Corporation (through May 1, 2026). - ID 26-245 – Resolution 2026-28 adopted (41st AAR appropriating $1,500,000 contingent on Measure P funds returned by Fresno Arts Council). - ID 26-197 – Item tabled to March 26, 2026 (runway reconstruction project at Fresno Yosemite International Airport). - ID 26-161 – Second amendment to consultant agreement with Provost & Pritchard (wellhead treatment improvements, revised total $259,786). - ID 26-160 – Pave More Now Bid Package B-1 contract awarded to Agee Construction ($8,329,396). - ID 26-168 – HAWK project contract awarded to Power Design Electric ($585,107.01). - ID 26-170 – HAWK and traffic signal improvements contract awarded to Avison Construction ($1,559,200). - ID 26-165 – Blackstone Smart Mobility Project contracts awarded (product purchase $578,794.87 to AI Construction; construction $5,008,997 to Avison Construction). - ID 26-244 – Fourth amendment to consultant agreement with Kleinfelder (no additional cost, term extended to August 28, 2026). - ID 26-181 – Park at South Stadium Project: Two resolutions adopted (Resolution 2026-24 for $8,000,000 from Revolving Loan Fund; Resolution 2026-25 for $3,727,000 in city funds, revised from $3,000,000, with staff report date corrected to May 15, 2026). - ID 26-193 – First amendment to consultant agreement with GHD for environmental cleanup at 1457 H Street (term extended to October 7, 2027). - ID 26-195 – Resolution 2026-26 adopted (repealing Resolution 2025-68, authorizing Homekey+ application with Parkway Prime, LLC). - ID 26-202 – Resolution 2026-30 adopted (accept $11,269 OHV grant); Resolution 2026-31 adopted (40th AAR appropriating $11,269). - ID 26-194 – Sixth amendment to consultant agreement with Carollo Engineers (no additional cost, extended to December 31, 2027). - ID 26-176 – Resolution 2026-32 adopted (authorizing submission of Measure C TOD grant application up to $1,400,000). - ID 26-234 – Moved to contested consent (school zone speed limit), later approved. Public Comments & Testimony - Truck Repair Shop Appeal (ID 26-47): Nick S., project manager, spoke in favor of the project, noting four years of work, reduced project size, and compliance with zoning. No opposition speakers. - TEFRA Hearing (ID 26-243): Two speakers raised concerns: one speaker argued that the project was not truly student housing and that community meetings were lacking; another speaker criticized the percentage of affordable units (32 units at 50–80% AMI) and questioned the developer's ties to the mayor. They also urged more time for public review. - Special Meeting (ID 26-272 – Park at South Stadium DDA): Multiple speakers addressed the council. Dez Martinez objected to the revolving loan fund being used for projects she considered not affordable, alleged a conflict of interest regarding the city manager's prior consulting work for the developer, and called for more community input. Esther Hensley stated that Southwest Fresno residents feel excluded from planning and funding decisions. Oversized speakers later commented on the special meeting item. - Unscheduled Communication: Charlie Roberts of Clovis Lions Club expressed frustration about unrepaired sidewalks in his neighborhood (Shields and Palm area), reporting that a 90-year-old neighbor broke her hip and had to move to a convalescent home due to hazardous lifted sidewalks. Jerry Veliz requested the city replace his bike after a rack failure. Esther Hensley again noted Southwest Fresno's exclusion from pre-funding discussions. Discussion Items - Truck Repair Shop Appeal (ID 26-47): Planning Manager Siegrist presented. The appeal, filed by Councilmember Arias, was originally due to a legal opinion conflict that was resolved. Councilmember Arias proposed increasing on‑site truck parking from 9 to 12 spaces and passenger vehicle parking from 6 to 12 to avoid future code enforcement issues due to daily fluctuations. Deputy City Attorney Heather Thomas confirmed the modification was permissible. The council denied the appeal and approved the development permit with the modifications. Motion carried 7‑0. - TEFRA Hearing (ID 26-243): Controller Danisi explained the hearing is for public input on up to $80 million in tax‑exempt bonds issued by the California Public Finance Authority for a student‑housing facility (later clarified as mixed‑income housing) on Fulton Street. Councilmember Richardson moved to approve the resolution subject to removing all references to “student housing,” as the project is actually mixed‑income. The mayor and staff noted that the legal documents already reflect the correct terminology. Councilmember Arias made the motion, seconded by Perea. The resolution (later numbered 2026-27) was adopted 6‑1 (Richardson opposed). - Uptown Apartments (ID 26-182, Contested Consent): Councilmember Richardson requested clarification on the revolving loan fund. Assistant Director Phil Skei explained the NOFA process, terms (up to $8 million, 5‑year loan, 4.81% interest, balloon payment), and that funds are state dollars secured by the mayor. After explanation, Councilmember Richardson moved approval; seconded by Arias. Resolution 2026-29 adopted 6‑0 (Karbassi absent). - School Zone Speed Limit (ID 26-234, Contested Consent): Vice President Esparza introduced the resolution to establish a 20 mph prima facie speed limit in school zones, citing state law AB 382 and safety data (pedestrian struck at 20 mph has 46% chance of moderate injury vs. 62% at 25 mph, and risk of death triples at 25 mph). Public Works Director Mosier confirmed no studies are needed, only sign swaps. Councilmembers supported, with Arias suggesting an educational campaign and coordinated implementation with school opening. Motion to approve carried 7‑0. - Mid-Year Budget (ID 26-233): Assistant Director Chinevere presented. Revenues exceed budget by $5.4 million, but costs (especially fire overtime and drill school) and structural issues yield a net ending balance of $7.99 million after adjustments. The FY27 base budget projects a $23.3 million gap. Councilmembers questioned fire overtime (budget $8.4 million, actual $9–11M, 50 vacancies), police overtime (budget $3.3–5M, no additional request), and the impact of state card‑room legislation (expected loss of $500,000 annually). The mayor noted ARPA funds are exhausted and attrition may need to increase. The attached resolution appropriating $1,960,800 for fire expenditures was adopted 5‑0 (Arias and Maxwell absent). - Special Meeting – Park at South Stadium DDA (ID 26-272): Mayor Dyer presented the amended and restated disposition and development agreement for the 174‑unit mixed‑income project at 815‑835 Fulton Street. The city will contribute up to $8 million from the revolving loan fund and $3,727,000 in city funds (including $727,000 land purchase). Councilmember Arias noted the project is shovel‑ready and will be a catalyst for downtown housing. Two votes taken: first with full council (including mayor) passed 8‑0; second council‑only vote passed 7‑0. Key Outcomes - Appeal Denied & Permit Modified: The appeal of the truck repair shop (P23-03606) was denied; the development permit was approved with truck parking increased to 12 spaces and passenger parking to 12 spaces (vote 7‑0). - TEFRA Bond Resolution Adopted: Approval of up to $80 million in tax‑exempt bonds for Ascent 613 (student/mixed‑income housing) at 815‑835 Fulton Street (vote 6‑1). - Special Meeting DDA Approved: The amended and restated disposition and development agreement for the Park at South Stadium project was approved (8‑0 full council; 7‑0 council only). - Uptown Apartments Revolving Loan: $8 million loan approved for Uptown Apartments at 1510 Van Ness Avenue (vote 6‑0). - School Zone Speed Limit: Resolution adopted establishing 20 mph prima facie speed limit in school zones, subject to mayoral veto (vote 7‑0). - Mid-Year Budget Actions: The 36th Amendment to the AAR was adopted, increasing appropriations by $1,960,800 for fire department expenditures (vote 5‑0, with two absences). The mid‑year budget review confirmed an estimated $23.3 million general fund deficit for fiscal year 2027. - Consent Calendar Approvals: Numerous routine items approved, including resolutions for housing projects, consultant amendments, grant applications, and infrastructure contracts. The airport runway reconstruction item was tabled to March 26, 2026. - Closed Session: The council discussed labor negotiations and multiple anticipated litigation cases; no reportable actions (meeting adjourned at 4:43 PM).

The Building Standards Appeals Board convened on February 24, 2026, at 1:00 PM. The meeting lasted only seven minutes, as the sole scheduled appeal was withdrawn prior to the meeting. The board approved the amended agenda and the consent calendar. Agenda Approval - The board approved the agenda as amended, removing Item VIII-A (Appeal of Fresno Code Enforcement case E25-01990 for 3316 E. Olive Avenue) because the appellant withdrew the appeal. Consent Calendar - The board approved the minutes of the January 20, 2026 regular meeting. Key Outcomes - The meeting adjourned at 1:07 PM without any further business.

Note: The official meeting minutes and agenda indicate the meeting occurred on Monday, January 26, 2026. However, per the summary instruction, the meeting date is listed as February 24, 2026. This discrepancy is noted. The Historic Preservation Commission convened to establish a Municipal Code Review Subcommittee, re‑elect its Chair and Vice Chair, receive an update on a December 2025 Chinatown fire that destroyed two historic structures, and review monthly staff and subcommittee reports. All votes were unanimous (6‑0, with Commissioner Federico absent). Consent Calendar - None. Public Comments & Testimony - Three members of the public addressed the Commission during unscheduled items: - Nikki: Expressed concern about overall city transparency and advocated for a public information portal to improve access to city processes. - Edward Medrano: Described difficulties with both the City’s senior paint program and the County’s lead‑abatement program. He stated that he qualified for assistance but was denied due to budget limits and miscommunication. He urged the Commission to use its influence to improve inter‑agency coordination, noting potential benefits for historic properties. - Linda Scambrae (representing Heritage Fresno): Offered partnership and support for May’s Historic Preservation Month. Proposed displaying historic lanterns at public locations, organizing tours of historic buildings, improving exhibit materials, and coordinating publicity. She volunteered to serve on any related committee. Discussion Items VI‑A – Establishment and Appointment of the Municipal Code Review Subcommittee (Continued from December 22, 2025) - The Commission confirmed the need to form a subcommittee to update the Municipal Code for the digital era. Commissioners Halajian, Johnston, and Vice Chair Hatwig volunteered to serve. Questions about including an attorney directly on the subcommittee were resolved: a fourth member would create a quorum and risk a Brown Act violation, so legal review will occur indirectly through staff. The subcommittee will present updates and seek feedback from the full Commission. Staff outlined a revision process (redlining, advisory input, attorney review, City Council approval). The timeline anticipates monthly meetings over three to four months, with completion by year’s end. No public comment was received. VII‑A – Annual Election of Commission Chair and Vice Chair - Commissioner Laval nominated Chair Sponsler and Vice Chair Hatwig to remain in their positions during the transitional year, citing ongoing Municipal Code Updates and the importance of America 250. The motion was seconded and approved unanimously. VII‑B – Update on Chinatown Fire (1548 Tulare Street) - Representatives from the California High Speed Rail Authority (Augie Blancas and Brenda McKenzie) reported remotely. On December 7, 2025, three trespassers started a fire that destroyed the vacant building. The building had been in poor condition with over ten prior fire incidents. High‑speed rail contractors are conducting demolition and cleanup, expected to take approximately two more months. Asbestos and lead abatement had been underway prior to the fire. Staff clarified the building was not eligible for local, state, or national historic registers, though it had been referenced in past Chinatown surveys. High‑speed rail staff agreed to provide written follow‑up on the last formal evaluation. - The adjacent Haruji Ego Family Building (Heritage Property No. 8) sustained severe structural damage from sharing a wall with the burned structure and was demolished on an emergency basis. Staff stated it will be removed from the City’s Heritage Property list as it no longer exists. - Commissioners discussed broader concerns about deterioration and fire risks in Chinatown, noting challenges from unoccupied buildings, unclear property ownership, and slow revitalization. Staff emphasized ongoing city investments in public safety, activation, and homelessness response, but noted long‑term improvement depends on property owner maintenance and increased activity in the area. VII‑C – Update on Regular Monthly Topics - Staff Updates (Ashley Atkinson): - Brewer Adobe: The tarp placed by the property owner remains in place and satisfies current requirements. Staff has requested a follow‑up meeting with the owner’s architect and engineer to discuss a demolition plan preserving walls identified by the Commission. The meeting has not yet been scheduled. A joint letter from Code Enforcement and Historic Preservation was issued in fall 2025; staff is preparing to ensure the meeting occurs and will proceed if the owner remains unresponsive. - December 2025 Activity Report: Continued review of planning entitlements, many routed to the Architectural Review Subcommittee. A significant number of building‑permit reviews were completed due to the new process for all structures 50 years or older. A small number of Section 106 reviews were conducted; no Mills Act or Mitigation applications were submitted. - Subcommittee Updates: - Architectural Review Subcommittee (Vice Chair Hatwig): Reported high activity, with at least five buildings reviewed recently, including two earlier that day. Many projects involve structures from the late 1960s or 1970s, reflecting the 50‑year review threshold. The Subcommittee is distinguishing items that can be handled at its level versus those requiring full Commission attention. Members discussed the threshold’s effectiveness, noting it captures notable structures that might otherwise be overlooked. - Historic Preservation Month Subcommittee (Commissioner Laval): The subcommittee met recently and will continue developing ideas for May’s calendar. All Commissioners are encouraged to contribute ideas, with a goal to finalize the calendar by March. Key Outcomes - Municipal Code Review Subcommittee Established and Appointed: Commissioners Halajian, Johnston, and Vice Chair Hatwig were appointed to the subcommittee. Commissioner Eddings will provide review through staff as needed. The motion carried 6‑0. - Chair and Vice Chair Re‑Elected: James Sponsler and Jason Hatwig were unanimously re‑elected as Chair and Vice Chair, respectively, for the current year. - Chinatown Fire Update Acknowledged: The Commission received the update and noted the loss of the two structures. Follow‑up information on the historic evaluation of the burned building is expected in writing. - Next Meeting: Scheduled for February 23, 2026 (per minutes) or February 23, 2026, in Room 2165. (Note: this is the next meeting date; the summary instruction date is February 24, 2026.)

Note: The minutes indicate the meeting was held on February 23, 2026, but the official meeting date provided is February 24, 2026. This summary uses the provided date. The Fresno Historic Preservation Commission met on February 24, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. to consider several agenda items. The meeting included a hearing on the historic eligibility of a former department store, a development permit for renovations to another historic building, a report on Kearney Mansion upgrades, and monthly updates. Commissioners discussed the need for additional information on the eligibility matter and approved design refinements for the renovation project. The meeting adjourned at 7:58 p.m. Public Comments & Testimony - Kathleen Light (Board Secretary, Fresno Area Spanning Foundation and Planning Commissioner) spoke in support of the Berkeley's Department Store renovation project (Item 7B), arguing that activated architecture is necessary for downtown revitalization and that the building's vacant state undermines its historic appreciation. She requested that the commission allow the project to proceed without additional conditions. - A member of the public (unscheduled items) announced that May is Historic Preservation Month and shared details about a Heritage Fresno film screening on May 28, 2026, at Warnor's Theatre, highlighting preservation efforts and the Caglia family's contributions. The event will include a concert and lobby tour. - No opposition testimony was received for any agenda item. Discussion Items - Item 7A – Hearing on eligibility for listing on the Local Register of Historic Resources – 755 E Shaw Ave (former Weinstock's/Forever 21) - Staff (Ashley Atkinson) presented the property, built in 1970, designed by Charles Luckman Associates. Staff could not determine eligibility based on available evidence and requested commission guidance. A historic resource assessment from the applicant was pending. - Representatives from Macerich and Dick's Sporting Goods described plans for a new Dick's House of Sport that requires demolition of the existing structure. A consultant from Page & Turnbull presented preliminary findings that the building is not individually eligible, noting it is one of three identical designs and that Charles Luckman likely was not directly involved. They argued it does not meet criteria for events, persons, or architecture. - Commissioners raised questions about architectural integrity, the building's role in Fresno's urban development, and the need for more information, especially regarding Luckman's involvement and the building's relevance to commercial history. Commissioner Federico emphasized the importance of the building in the timeline of Fresno's retail development. Commissioner Laval noted the need for a complete cultural and architectural assessment. - The commission agreed more information was needed and voted to continue the item to the next meeting (March 23, 2026) to allow completion of the historic resource evaluation report. Motion carried 5-0. - Item 7B – Development Permit Application P25-03963 for renovations to former Berkeley's Department Store at 887 Fulton Street - Staff presented that the building is already eligible for the Local Register. Proposed changes include removal of barrel-vaulted canopies, new second-story windows, new storefront systems, a third-floor addition, and a rooftop deck. Staff noted some changes may be irreversible. - Applicant (Fresno Area Spanning Foundation) and architect (Russ Taylor of The Taylor Group) described severe interior deterioration and the need for windows to create leasable office space. They emphasized that the building has been vacant for 40 years and that the project is critical for downtown revitalization. The architect stated that the barrel canopy structure would remain but be covered with a modern fascia. - Commissioners stressed the importance of preserving character-defining features, particularly the barrel vaulted canopies, and recommended that new windows be clearly differentiated from original ground-floor windows. Commissioner Laval suggested adding an interior plaque or display to honor the building's history. - The commission approved the application as amended, referring the revised plans to the Architecture Review Subcommittee for review. The item will return to the full commission only if the subcommittee determines additional review is needed. Motion carried 5-0. - Item 7C – Report from Fresno City & County Historical Society on Kearney Mansion Upgrades - Commissioner Laval presented an update on restoration work funded by approximately $500,000 in ARPA funds from Fresno County. Current projects include roof repair at the carriage house, replacement of exterior staircases with historically appropriate wood railings, stabilization of the second-floor deck, and repainting of the mansion's exterior. About 70% of the interior remains original. The property continues to host tours and educational programs. Additional historical features were highlighted, including original outbuildings and rail lines. - Item 7D – Update on Regular Monthly Topics - Staff reported that efforts to schedule a meeting with the property owner of the Jose Garcia Brewer Adobe building continue, with no change in condition. Building permits remain higher than previous years as all permits for buildings over 50 years old are reviewed. Letters will be sent in March to designated properties about Mills Act applications. - Commissioner Halajian gave brief updates on the Architectural Review and Municipal Code Subcommittees. - Commissioner Laval reported that the Historic Preservation Month Subcommittee met and is developing a calendar of events. The kickoff is planned for May 7, 2026, at the Archive on Kern during ArtHop. Plans include food trucks and displays to highlight the semi-quincentennial year. All commissioners are encouraged to contribute ideas. - Chairperson's Report – Chair Sponsler announced that the Lowell/North Park neighborhood will host a history tour on April 11, 2026, featuring trolley tours of historic homes, art, and other features. - Unscheduled Items – Commissioner Laval noted that Fresno City College will host a historical walking tour on April 30, 2026, as the oldest city community college in the state. Key Outcomes - Item 7A: The commission voted unanimously (5-0) to continue the eligibility hearing to March 23, 2026, to allow completion of the historic resource evaluation report. - Item 7B: The commission approved the development permit as amended (5-0), referring revised plans to the Architecture Review Subcommittee with conditions that the barrel-vaulted canopies be retained and new windows be differentiated from original ones. An interior historical display is recommended. - Item 7C: The report was received as information; no action required. - Item 7D: Updates were noted; no formal votes. - Next meeting scheduled: March 23, 2026.

Date discrepancy note: The meeting minutes specify Wednesday, February 18, 2026, but the user-provided date is February 24, 2026. This summary uses the supplied date of February 24, 2026, as instructed. The Fresno Planning Commission met on February 24, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. in City Hall Council Chambers. The commission approved a consent calendar item (a one‑year extension for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6345) and, after public testimony and deliberation, approved a Conditional Use Permit (CUP P24‑04502) for a six‑unit apartment complex at 108 West Lemon Avenue. Commissioner Diaz recused herself from that item. Several members of the public raised concerns about community notification and the affordability of new housing in Southwest Fresno. Consent Calendar - ID 26‑152 – Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6345 extension: Approved unanimously (5‑0, with two commissioners absent). The item granted a discretionary one‑year extension of time to the expiration date for the map, subject to original conditions of approval and the attached Development Impact Fees dated January 27, 2026. Public Comments & Testimony - Item VIII‑B (CUP P24‑04502): Three members of the public spoke in opposition. - Brunette (Heal for Southwest Fresno): Stated that the community was not adequately notified about the project and that residents of Southwest Fresno are being excluded from planning decisions. - Second speaker: Questioned whether the project would include units affordable at 30% or below area median income, asked about covenants, public funding, and long‑term rent protections. Raised concerns about rising homelessness among elderly residents on fixed incomes. - Third speaker (Majesty): Expressed regret for not reviewing the project materials in advance and indicated a desire to listen. - Unscheduled Oral Communications (four speakers): - Brunette (Heal for Southwest Fresno): Stated that the commission “does not care” about the needs of elderly and low‑income residents in Southwest Fresno, and threatened federal funding cuts if community voices continue to be ignored. - Second unscheduled speaker: Seconded Brunette's frustration, urging commissioners to “listen” rather than just “hear,” noted that $1,500 /month rent is unaffordable for fixed‑income residents, and questioned the speed of the vote. - Bobby (Southwest Fresno resident): Opposed the project, stating that the community lacks meaningful input, that elderly residents cannot afford rising rents, and that federal dollars are not reinvested in West Fresno. - Fourth unscheduled speaker: Said commissioners would exercise more due diligence if they faced personal liability, and criticized the city’s history of litigation over land‑use decisions. Discussion Items - Commissioner Reports: Commissioner Shergill reported observing beautification efforts along Veterans Boulevard and expressed hope for similar improvements on Freeway 99 and the Fresno Street exit. - Item VIII‑B – Conditional Use Permit P24‑04502 (six‑unit apartment complex at 108 West Lemon Avenue): - Staff presentation (Matthew Woodward): Described the 0.51‑acre parcel zoned RS‑5 (residential medium density) in the Neighborhood Revitalization Overlay District. The project includes three buildings with six three‑bedroom units, nine covered parking spaces, four visitor spaces, and required Type 1 landscape buffers with drought‑tolerant trees. No letters of opposition or support were received from the required noticing (owners and tenants within 1,000 feet). - Applicant presentation: The applicant, a West Fresno native with a prior affordable housing project in the area, stated the goal is to provide affordable rental housing. He noted that his previous project kept three‑bedroom rents at $900 for many years, only raising to $1,150 and later $1,350, and that the new project is privately funded with no government subsidies or covenants. - Commissioner questions: Commissioners asked about anticipated rent levels. The applicant estimated $1,500–$1,600 for a three‑bedroom unit with a garage, and noted that inflation has raised construction costs. - Staff clarification: Staff confirmed that the project is not a covenanted affordable housing development; it is a privately funded project meeting Development Code requirements. - Commissioner comments: Commissioner Shergill expressed support for new housing investment in West Fresno and noted that $1,500 rent is considered affordable in today’s market. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar: Approved unanimously (5‑0, Commissioners Criner and Lyday absent). - Item VIII‑B (CUP P24‑04502): Approved on a motion by Vice Chair Bray, seconded by Commissioner Shergill. Roll‑call vote: Chair Vang – yes, Vice Chair Bray – yes, Commissioner Calandra – yes, Commissioner Shergill – yes, Commissioner Diaz – recused. (4‑0‑1). The motion carried. - Staff report: No training occurred at this meeting; staff will resend the “Findings” workshop materials and continue offering training on Development Code topics in future meetings. - Meeting adjourned at 6:38 p.m.