Plan for Our Future
2020 Gilbert General Plan
⬚ figure
RATIFIED, AUGUST 2020
Assembled by OpenPublica from the documents it serves for this government. Each section below is a separate publication by the government, and its page numbers are that section's own. We have pinned 1 slot here, so an element absent from this file may simply not have been reviewed yet.
⬚ figure
RATIFIED, AUGUST 2020
(blank page)
Mayor Jenn Daniels Vice Mayor Scott Anderson Councilmember Eddie Cook Councilmember Brigette Peterson Councilmember Jordan Ray Councilmember Jared L. Taylor Councilmember Aimee Yentes
Brian Andersen, Chair Carl Bloomfield- Vice Chair David Cavenee Noah Mundt Scott September Jän Simon Les Smith Philip Alibrandi- Alternate Nathan Mackin- Alternate
Adam Baugh, Whitney Morris, PLC Ben Cooper, Cooper Development Strategies Brian Andersen, Gilbert Planning Commission Brigette Peterson, Town Councilmember Denny Barney, East Valley Partnership Joan Krueger, NAI Horizon Judy Cato, Victory AME Church Kathy Tilque, Gilbert Chamber of Commerce Les Presmyk, Gilbert Parks and Recreation Board Mike Thomason, Higley Unified School District Preston Basha, Vodaa Technologies/ Bashas Inc. Scott Anderson, Gilbert Town Council Scott Morrison, Morrison Ranch Tony Bianchi, Phoenix- Mesa Gateway Airport Trinity Donovan, AZCEND Tyler Hudgins, Redevelopment Commission
Patrick Banger, Town Manager Mary Goodman, Deputy Town Manager Kyle Mieras, AICP, Director of Development Services Eva Cutro, AICP, Planning Division Manager Catherine Lorbeer, AICP, Principal Planner Ashlee MacDonald, AICP, Senior Planner
Michael Baker International Gunn Communications ESI Corporation Kimley-Horn Small Giants
⬚ figure
What is Gilbert’s Plan For Our Future? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Planning Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
How to Use This Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Gilbert’s Planning Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Gilbert’s History. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
The Planning Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Trends & Influences. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Community Goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Land Use Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Growth Areas Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Character Areas Framework. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Trends & Influences. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Opportunity Goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Parks, Open Space, Trails, and Recreation Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
Infrastructure and Public Services Framework. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
Community Services Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
Trends & Influences. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
Connectivity Goals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
Connectivity Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
General Plan Elements by Goal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
General Plan Elements by Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
Policy Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
Heritage District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
Gateway . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
Morrison Ranch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
Santan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
Implementation Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
General Plan Amendments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163
⬚ figure
1- Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Exhibit 1. Planning Area and Municipal Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2- Community . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Exhibit 2. Land Use Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Exhibit 3. Growth Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Exhibit 4. Character Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
3- Opportunity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Exhibit 5. Noise Exposure Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
Exhibit 6. Aggregates Resources Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Exhibit 7. Parks, Open Space and Trails Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
Exhibit 8. Public Services and Facilities Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
Exhibit 9. Education Facilities Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
4- Connectivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
Exhibit 10. Bicycle Facilities Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
Exhibit 11. Circulation & Transit System Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
5- Elements & Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
6- Character Guidance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
Exhibit 12. Character Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
7- Plan For Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
⬚ figure
TABLE OF CONTENTS v
⬚ figure
A century ago, it was the vision of a small agrarian community that established the foundation of the Town of Gilbert. Today, Gilbert is one of Arizona’s top communities and continues to be ranked by national organizations as one of the best places to live, raise a family, and find employment in the country. These accolades, along with many others, collectively characterize what makes Gilbert exceptional.
While Gilbert’s commitment to the concept of a forward-looking, family-oriented community with a small-town atmosphere has positioned the Town for success, there is more work to be done. To be the City of the Future, Gilbert seeks to continue to innovate, lead and balance the challenges that come with growth, while maintaining the foundational characteristics that make the Town desirable. In response, Gilbert presents this Plan For Our Future, Gilbert’s 2020 General Plan Update.
This Plan is a clear, comprehensive, and continuous vision to guide Gilbert to be the City of the Future
Plan for Our Future: Gilbert’s 2020 General Plan is the Community’s vision and guide for future physical, economic and social development and is a long-range policy document covering a period of ten (10) to twenty (20) years. The General Plan contains of a vision statement, along with maps, goals, policies and implementation actions that guide decisions such as how the Town grows and looks in the future; areas appropriate for residential, employment and commercial uses; areas to reserve for parks and open space; the location of new roads and trails; and how preservation and conservation may be achieved.
The General Plan ultimately endeavors to unify Gilbert’s strategic approach to growth and development to assist in making choices that continue to guide the Town into a prosperous future that is in sync with the core vision and values of the community.
Plan for Our Future is meant to be used for a variety of reasons and by multiple users. For instance, the Town Council will use this Plan to define policy and to make funding and budgetary decisions. The Plan will also be used by Town staff to guide building and development, and to make recommendations on projects and programs. The General Plan may also be used by residents, neighborhood groups, businesses, and other stakeholders to understand the Town’s long-range plans and proposals for different geographic areas within Gilbert.
⬚ figure
Arizona State Statute (§9-461.05) requires that all municipalities must prepare and adopt a comprehensive general plan for the physical development of land within its jurisdiction. Specific requirements for content or “elements” of the plan are based on the total population of a community. Based on Gilbert’s current population, A.R.S. requires the Town’s General Plan to address 17 specific elements: Land Use; Circulation; Open Space; Growth Areas; Environmental Planning; Cost of Development; Water Resources; Conservation; Recreation; Public Services and Facilities; Public Buildings; Housing; Conservation, Rehabilitation and Redevelopment; Safety; Bicycling; Energy; and Neighborhood Preservation and Revitalization. These elements are further described and addressed in Chapter 5: General Plan Elements and Policies.
A.R.S. further requires readoption and voter ratification of the Town’s General Plan every 10 years; thus, Gilbert’s General Plan is up for readoption as the plan was last adopted by voters in May, 2011.
⬚ figure
Visioning is a critical step in articulating the shared values of Gilbert residents, business owners and community leaders. The Vision Statement below is a description of what Gilbert wants to become through the implementation of its General Plan. The Vision Statement provides a sense of purpose and mission for the Town and sets the tone for the subsequent themes, strategies, policies and actions throughout the General Plan.
Gilbert’s Vision Statement and associated values stem from the previous 2011 Gilbert General Plan. Through the public outreach process, both the community and General Plan Advisory Group (GPAG) members had the opportunity to participate in commenting on and updating the Vision Statement. Through this review process, only subtle adjustments were completed because both the public and GPAG members believed that the General Plan’s Vision has served the Town well, and still holds as true today as it did 10 years ago.
⬚ figure
Gilbert, a safe, healthy, clean, attractive, family-oriented community that embraces our Town’s heritage yet recognizes the opportunities of the future without sacrificing the resources of today. Gilbert will continue to thrive as a Town with:
Plan For Our Future recognizes that Gilbert is made up of complex, interconnected systems that cannot be siloed into independent elements.
An innovative part of the Gilbert 2020 General Plan update involves a shift from the original General Plan document structure. Traditionally, General Plans have been organized into chapters for each of the state-required elements, such as: land use, circulation, housing, community services, parks and recreation, and the environment, among others. Within these chapters or elements, corresponding goals and policies are then outlined to guide future decision making. However, this element by element approach causes chapters to be independent of one other, which creates excessive redundancies amongst identified goals and policies, and establishes no clear connection or means to create unified priorities for implementation across elements.
The 2020 General Plan recognizes that Gilbert is made up of complex, interconnected systems that cannot be siloed into independent elements. Goals that guide land use can also impact transportation or policies that drive housing can impact economic development. Consequently, a modified approach was applied to the General Plan which organizes the plan around three broad interconnected systems or themes that convey the general ideals Gilbert is planning for over the next 20 years in order to reach the envisioned future.
At the core of Plan For Our Future, we must equally prioritize COMMUNITY, OPPORTUNITY and CONNECTIVITY.
COMMUNITY focuses on the livability fundamentals that create Gilbert’s unique and desirable character.
OPPORTUNITY establishes a framework to ensure smart, fiscally- sustainable, environmentally conscious, and healthy growth into the future.
CONNECTIVITY addresses the safe, convenient, equitable, and efficient movement of people and goods.
⬚ figure
The physical structure of the document has been updated to develop a more action-oriented plan; facilitate greater coordination between the various themes; and align and prioritize policies to help us more effectively achieve our goals.
| Chapter I:<br>Introduction | This Chapter serves as a welcome to the plan. The Chapter describes what Gilbert’s Plan For Our Future is, how it is structured, what it includes and how it was created. |
Chapters 2-4:<br>Themes<br><br>⬚ figure<br><br>Community<br><br>⬚ figure<br><br>Opportunity<br><br>⬚ figure<br><br>Connectivity | Each core theme opens with a statement articulating the important role that the subject matter plays in the function of our community. This is followed by in-depth research and analysis to illustrate trends and influences related to each theme. The context from the trends and influences analysis is then used, along with ongoing community involvement and stakeholder input obtained throughout the planning process, as a foundation for setting goals and policies.<br><ul><li>Goals are high-level statements of desired future outcomes. They are intended to reflect community input and state the plan’s intent as clearly as possible.</li><li>Policies are more detailed statements intended to guide Town decision-making in a manner that achieves applicable General Plan goals. The General Plan includes numerous policies, each of which supports one or more goals. Thus, generalized policy statements are displayed under each applicable goal, and more detailed policy intent statements are succinctly included in Chapter 5 to provide further direction in their application. Because many policies apply to multiple goals, policies are intentionally repeated under several themes and goals within this Plan.</li><li>Framework Plans are also found within each theme. These plans play a key role in applying the broad strategies and policies of the General Plan. They display map-based information across various subject areas such as land use, growth areas, parks and open space and transportation that indicate Gilbert’s intent for where and how it seeks to direct development and manage growth within the Town’s planning area.</li></ul> |
| Chapter 5:<br>Elements and Policies | There are State-mandated “elements” or topics that State law requires a General Plan to address for a community the size of Gilbert. Chapter 5 outlines how each Town policy applies to these required elements.<br><br>This Chapter also includes a library of all the policies and their supporting language that will be used to guide Town decision-making in a manner that achieves the General Plan Vision. |
| Chapter 6:<br>Character Guidance | This Chapter provides additional definition and detail regarding specific goals, policies and guidelines associated with identified Character Areas within the Town. |
| Chapter 7:<br>Plan For Action | Chapter 7 sets forth implementation actions, measures, procedures, or techniques intended to implement one or more policies to help reach a specified goal. Some action statements represent efforts that the Town may already undertake and thus should continue, modify or expand. Others propose new actions that represent new approaches to addressing issues facing the Town. An action may also be ongoing or something that can be completed in a targeted timeframe. |
A helpful guide to the key elements of this plan
⬚ figure
Goal Identifier. Each goal is preceded by a notation that includes an acronym that corresponds to the overarching theme and a number based on the overall goal order.
Goal Statement. An introductory title communicates the broad goal. This is followed by a detailed statement of purpose that defines the desired goal outcome towards which the Town will direct efforts during the 20-year timeframe of the plan.
Policy Identifier. Each policy is preceded by a number based on the overall policy order as defined in the Policy Summary located in Chapter 5.
Policy Statement. An introductory title communicates the broad policy direction. Each policy is supported by a more detailed statement within the Policy Summary located in Chapter 5 that identifies specific policy intent. A policy is a clear statement guiding a specific course of action for decision-makers to achieve a desired goal.
Where to find more. Additional General Plan chapters along Town policy and regulatory documents help to further advance the vision of Gilbert’s Plan For Our Future. These other chapters and Town documents are referenced throughout this Plan in sidebars called “Where to Find More.”
⬚ figure
The Town of Gilbert is located in Maricopa County, in the southeast valley of the Phoenix metropolitan area. Gilbert’s planning area encompasses 72.6 square miles. The Town shares boundaries with the City of Mesa, City of Chandler, Town of Queen Creek, Gila River Indian Community and Pinal County. There are several areas of unincorporated land within Gilbert’s planning area, many entirely surrounded by the Town.
Gilbert’s planning area is approaching full build-out, with only select portions remaining as vacant and undeveloped land.
Planning Area Map
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
In 1920, the town's 500 citizens incorporated and the Town of Gilbert was officially born on July 6th, 1920. The Town was less than one square mile in size.
⬚ figure
Downtown Gilbert circa 1928
⬚ figure
Gilbert Train Depot Circa 1905
⬚ figure
Bags of Grain Transported Through Downtown Gilbert
Gilbert's first homesteads were filed by six men and four women. Some of these farms were provided free if the family stayed for at least five years. Others paid the government for the land which could be purchased for as little as 50 cents an acre. The earliest homestead was purchased in 1893.
In 1902, the Arizona Eastern Railway solicited donations of right-of-way in order to establish a rail line between Phoenix and Florence. A rail siding was established on property owned by William "Bobby" Gilbert. The rail siding and the Town that developed became known as Gilbert.
Gilbert was a prime farming community due to the construction of the Roosevelt Dam and the Eastern and Consolidated Canals in 1911. Because of the area's rich land, Gilbert became a center for shipping cattle, sheep and dairy products as well as growing grains, melons, cotton and alfalfa hay. During World War I, the cavalry needed an ever-increasing amount of alfalfa to feed their horses. Gilbert helped supply the need, becoming known as the Hay Shipping Capital of the World.
Gilbert’s population has more than doubled since 2000 to approximately 265,900, making it one of the largest communities in Arizona.
Gilbert began to take its current shape during the 1970’s when the Town Council approved a strip annexation that encompassed fifty-three (53) square miles of county land. Although the population was only 1,971 in 1970, the Council realized that Gilbert would eventually grow and develop much like the neighboring communities of Tempe, Mesa, and Chandler. This proved to be a farsighted decision as Gilbert positioned itself for growth in the 1980’s and beyond.
Beginning in the 1980’s, Gilbert grew at a pace unparalleled by most communities in the United States, increasing in population from 5,717 in 1980 to over 208,000 in 2010. As Gilbert has grown, the community has recognized the need to develop a strong, diverse economy while preserving its highly desirable quality of life. To proactively direct the growth and development of the community, the Town Council adopted and the voters approved the previous General Plan in May 2011, which revised existing elements, added elements required under Arizona “Growing Smarter and Growing Smarter Plus” legislation, and incorporated new land use and economic growth considerations.
Much has happened in Gilbert since 2011. The Town is now celebrating its Centennial and has grown to over 265,900 people, catapulting Gilbert to become one of the largest communities in Arizona. Over the last 10-years exceptional development projects, great schools, high income levels, and low unemployment rates have advanced the overall quality of life in Gilbert and given rise to the Town becoming recognized as one of the best places to live in the Nation. Together, these changes—and many yet to come—offer opportunities and present challenges as Gilbert rapidly approaches build-out and evolves into a City of the Future.
⬚ figure
Gilbert has a tradition of thoughtful planning in response to the rapid growth and change that has occurred over the last several decades. Several of these planning efforts are highlighted in the timeline below. To ensure the most pressing ambitions of these plans are carried forward, all previous and concurrent planning efforts were critical inputs to the 2020 General Plan Update process.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
Gilbert’s Plan For Our Future kicked-off in the summer of 2018 with a focus on updating the current General Plan to reflect shifting trends and development conditions within the Town today, as well as to define a general path forward addressing needs and opportunities broadly and comprehensively to prepare Gilbert story for the next 100 years. This was the catalyst of a continuous sequence of four planning phases that took more than 22 months to complete. The diagram on the following page shows the planning phases and overall timeline.
⬚ figure
Phase I – Recognize The initial phase of the General Plan update process focused on building upon existing plans and developing an understanding of some of the key issues, opportunities, and challenges within the community. This work culminated with the development of a baseline Community Assessment Report. This report summarized existing Town and regional trends and circumstances, provided inventory maps, and analyzed projected growth conditions. This report can be found in Appendix A.
Phase II – Engage Phase II was the cornerstone of the project and was carried out over the entire lifespan of the General Plan update process. Efforts within this phase focused on utilizing multiple outreach tools to understand community preferences and assist in developing the themes, goals, policies and actions that form the foundation of the General Plan. Specific outreach tools and methods are more thoroughly described in the following sections.
Phase III – Enrich Phase III involved the actual drafting of Gilbert’s Plan For Our Future. This process began with taking all of the previous plans and feedback received and establishing the overall structure of the General Plan. This work resulted in refining the current General Plan to remove redundant efforts and apply a systems approach centered around 1 vision, 3 themes, and numerous goals and policies that collectively define a comprehensive, unified and integrated path to prepare Gilbert for the future.
Phase IV – Achieve The final phase of the project centered on addressing public review comments on the draft plan and facilitation of the formal adoption process through public hearings before the Town Planning Commission and Town Council. This phase also included the development of an interactive, web-based General Plan.
In association with the Plan For Our Future Public Involvement Plan (PIP), citizen input informed and guided the planning process to ensure diverse interests and perspectives were incorporated into the General Plan. Various opportunities to gather direct input from the community were also used to further inform and provide deeper insight into Town achievements, needs, and concerns.
Specific public engagement techniques utilized included developing a 16-member general Plan Advisory Group (GPAG), creating a user-friendly project website, conducting a community-wide online survey, offering a robust online mapping tool, and hosting community, youth and mobile workshops. To help promote the use of these engagement opportunities, a social media campaign was also launched with the assistance of the Town’s award-winning Office of Digital Government.
The adjacent figure shows the sequence of community engagement initiatives used at strategic intervals to solicit input and feedback throughout the planning process. The following pages provide a summary of the public feedback collected through these various channels. For a detailed summary of each engagement effort and associated public comments, please see Appendix B, Public Involvement Summary.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
The General Plan Advisory Group
*The General Plan Advisory Group (GPAG) was established to help guide the public process and to help shape the plan's outcomes. Members were selected to represent a broad spectrum of interests from throughout the Gilbert community. The GPAG played a critical role in ensuring the plan was responsive to neighborhood conditions and the aspirations of the community by providing advice and feedback to the planning team at crucial steps. The GPAG held seven meetings, and many members participated in community outreach events during the planning process.
The Plan For Our Future website informed community members about the general plan, project documents, ways to get involved, latest news and events, and contact information. Community members could also subscribe for project updates and submit comments to provide input on the General Plan.
All communities face challenges engaging residents in community outreach programs. Based on Gilbert's demographic profile, access to transportation and language were not challenges to participation. However, it is recognized that young families with children and dual income families with longer commute times in Gilbert find it difficult to participate in traditional public meetings on weekday evenings. To respond to this circumstance, a centerpiece of the General Plan public outreach effort was the use of mobile and online engagement techniques to allow residents to participate at a time that was most convenient for them.
⬚ figure
Chapter 1 • INTRODUCTION 16
Mobile Engagement efforts consisted of pop-up booths along with various interactive presentations and exercises held throughout the community. Numerous mobile workshops were held in association with larger Town events such as the Regional Park and Desert Sky Park Grand Opening as well as the Riparian Preserve After Dark events. Outreach was conducted with Town youth via the annual Student Government Days event and presentations were provided to all school districts. Town staff also visited various community facilities such as the senior center to ensure diverse feedback was collected.
Social Pinpoint, an online geographic based, community engagement tool was utilized in two different important stages of the planning process. Social Pinpoint allowed residents an opportunity to utilize their desktop, laptop, tablet or mobile device to take online surveys and post or “pin” location-based feedback on an interactive map of the community, helping to more clearly identify areas of focus, growth, or redevelopment.
The initial phase of online engagement primarily focused around garnering upfront feedback on topics such as which areas of Gilbert should be preserved or improved, types of additional housing choices, and desired transportation improvements. There were 550 total visits to the site, 387 survey responses and 137 mapping comments collected. The second phase of online engagement sought input on the overarching themes and strategies the General Plan should consider as well as feedback on the areas of growth and special character within the Town. There were 2,062 total visits to the site, 129 survey responses and 36 mapping comments collected at this stage.
Below are examples of images from the Social Pinpoint site. More information of the effort and specific comments from the public can be found in Appendix B.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
Community Workshop 1 was the first in a series of workshops that were conducted throughout the General Plan update process. The goal of Community Workshop 1 was to engage those community members who may not prefer to use web-based involvement tools and provide them with equal opportunity to share their input on planning for the Town’s future.
Attendees were able to actively participate in six different stations to give input and feedback on how they live, enjoy, move, work, and play in Gilbert. For consistency in the analysis of feedback, each station included interactive display boards where attendees could place stickers or post-it notes to provide their input on survey questions and mapping topics similar to those that were posed to the public online.
A detailed recap from Community Workshop 1 can be found in Appendix B.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
The goal of Community Workshop 2 was to review the key findings of the Community Assessment Report and explore options in establishing guiding themes and goals for the 2020 General Plan. These themes discussed at the workshop lead to setting unified policies that form the guiding foundation of the General Plan.
The people that attended the workshop were able to actively participate in three different stations to give input and feedback on their perceptions of community, connectivity, and opportunity in Gilbert. For consistency in the analysis of feedback, each station included interactive display boards where attendees could place stickers or post-it notes to provide their input on survey questions and mapping topics similar those that were posed to the public online. A detailed recap from Community Workshop 2 can be found in Appendix B.
⬚ figure
Community Workshop 3 was the final meeting in the workshops series. Attendees of this meeting were provided with a broad overview of the entire General Plan Update process and 60-Day review draft. This included sharing background information from the Community Assessment which was used to inform decision making throughout the process; a recap of public input gained from previous outreach efforts; presentation of the overarching vision and planning framework for the Plan; summary of the Plan goals and policies; along with proposed changes to the land use plan. Upon reviewing the meeting material residents were given comment cards that prompted them to share what they like and disliked about the draft Plan. A detailed recap from Community Workshop 3 can be found in Appendix B
⬚ figure
What you hear is true. Gilbert is more than a Town. It’s a collection of exceptional people, unique destinations, attractive neighborhoods and diverse cultural amenities that combine to create a world class community that feels like home to residents and visitors alike. The focus of this chapter is on preserving and enhancing these assets, managing growth and promoting bonds between residents in a way that strengthens the livability and sense of COMMUNITY in Gilbert.
This chapter is organized around seven key goals: Encourage a Balanced Land Use Framework; Focus on Quality Development; Foster Vibrant Gathering Places; Promote our Neighborhoods; Provide Diverse, High Quality Housing; Celebrate our History and Culture; and Bring Us Together.
⬚ figure
The Town of Gilbert has many assets that make it one of the most desirable places to live in the Country. Nonetheless, Gilbert does face challenges that impact the future growth and health of the Town. In order to develop an effective plan that strengthens our Community in the future, we must first understand the trends and influences that will impact our path to continued prosperity in Gilbert.
Gilbert’s population has increased and will likely continue to grow into the future.
Nearly 265,900 people currently call Gilbert home, which is a 142% growth rate since 2000, and an 28% growth rate since 2010. Gilbert’s population is projected to continue to increase through 2050 with a declining growth rate; the Town will ultimately reach a projected population of approximately 293,500 by 2030 (10% growth rate) and 318,000 by 2050 (8% growth rate).
While Gilbert’s population continues to increase, the Town’s rate of growth will continue to plateau as availability of undeveloped land dwindles. This reality requires a need for new strategies to create capacity for anticipated growth while maintaining the same quality and providing the same amenities that make Gilbert a desirable place to live.
Population Growth and Projections Source: 2000, 2010 Census/MAG Socioeconomic Projections (2019)
⬚ figure
| 2000 | 2010 | 2018 | 2020 | 2030 | 2040 | 2050 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilbert | 109,697 | 208,352 | 265,500 | 265,900 | 293,500 | 308,800 | 318,100 |
| Chandler | 176,581 | 236,123 | 270,300 | 279,500 | 309,100 | 321,100 | 329,000 |
| Scottsdale | 202,705 | 217,550 | 245,500 | 253,800 | 281,900 | 299,400 | 311,400 |
Population trends and shifts show that Gilbert, while still young overall, is aging.
The most significant change has been in the young adult population (20 to 44 year-olds), which decreased 8%, from 43% in 2000 to 35% in 2017; while the middle aged (45 to 64 year-olds) and senior populations (65+ year-olds) have increased 7% and 5% respectively, since 2000. The school aged population has stayed relatively constant while the youth population (0-5 year-olds) has steadily declined 3%, from 10% of the population in 2000 to just 7% of the population in 2017.
Understanding the common and diverging needs of these population groups is critical to maintaining Gilbert’s vibrancy over the long term. Continued emphasis on community services and urban amenities will be vital to meet the needs of the Town’s primary population base; while simultaneously, provide lifestyle facilities, services, and opportunities for the aging population.
Gilbert’s historic growth over the last twenty (20) years has largely occurred on “greenfield” or undeveloped land. With 84% of Gilbert’s planning area now developed or in the process of being developed, the availability of this greenfield land has significantly diminished. For a community that has largely thrived on the facilitation of new development on undeveloped land, this shift away from a traditional suburban, outward growth pattern is a significant change. As the Town’s high quality of life has been funded historically by new growth, the Town will need to identify new development opportunities such as infill development and redevelopment that can assist in generating revenues required to maintain the Town’s high standard of living.
⬚ figure
Land Use Distribution
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
Median Age in Gilbert
Age Group Composition Source: 2000, 2010 Census/2017 ACS
Similar to population, the number of housing units in Gilbert has increased and will likely continue into the future.
⬚ figure
In 2000, there were a total of 37,007 housing units in Gilbert, and by 2010, the housing stock more than doubled to 74,907. As of 2017, the total number of housing units increased to 87,145. Of those 87,145 housing units, an overwhelming 86.2% are low-density, single family homes, which are predominately larger in size; and only 13.5% of Gilbert’s existing housing stock is allocated to multi-family development (3 or more units per structure).
⬚ figure
The growth in housing units, coupled with the population increase, is confirmation of Gilbert’s desirability. However, the lack of diversity in the Town’s housing stock, low vacancy rates, and high median home value can impact the overall affordability of Gilbert in the long-term. When communities become less affordable, the ability to attract a varied workforce, which is often needed to recruit desired employers, may be hindered.
Additionally, the shift in population can affect the housing demand as seniors and middle- aged persons often prefer smaller-scale and lower-maintenance housing options. Conversely, young single adults and couples will increase demand for rental units and starter homes. Creating alternative housing options to the Town’s predominantly single family housing stock will be critical to meeting future housing demand. Additionally, Gilbert should explore increasing the supply of workforce housing and housing vouchers through new development and redevelopment as well as providing new market rate move-up units.
⬚ figure
Gilbert has a significant number of families, who typically look for larger dwellings.
The Percentage of Elderly and Single-Person Households has increased since 2000
As a family-oriented community, Gilbert also has one of the largest average household sizes (3.19 people) of any community in Maricopa County, so the need for traditional single family detached housing will continue. However, the trending growth and change in the Town’s demographic makeup (increase of single-person households and seniors) creates a demand for diverse types of housing choices and prices that are suited to people with different lifestyles.
⬚ figure
The majority of the housing stock in Gilbert was constructed in the 21st Century.
As it stands, over 55% of Gilbert’s housing stock was constructed since 2000, while 40% was constructed between the 1980 and 1999. The housing growth patterns have shifted from north to south over time.
While development of new subdivisions continues throughout Gilbert, some larger subdivisions in northern Gilbert are approaching forty (40) years old. As these neighborhoods age, revitalization and neighborhood stabilization policies will need to be considered to help maintain their character and vitality.
Source: Town of Gilbert
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
| LEGEND | |
|---|---|
| Gilbert Planning | |
| Year Built | |
| 1970 and Before (Historic eligibility in 2020) | |
| 1971 - 1980 (Historic eligibility in 2030) | |
| 1981 - 1990 (Historic eligibility in 2040) |
The following goals are action based statements of intended efforts that must be undertaken to support Gilbert’s Focus on Community. Using findings from the trends and influences and feedback from the public, these goals were developed to define a clear and succinct framework of where Gilbert will focus future actions to address community identified issues.
One of the main reasons for Gilbert’s continued prosperity is due to the Town’s history of being a well-planned community with high quality development. As Gilbert’s growth continues, we must effectively utilize our land supply and manage our development patterns while maintaining our community character.
Policies: Click on the Policy number for expanded Policy description.
| 1 | Ensure the Town maintains a land use framework that supports a highly livable community through the efficient use of land and resources. |
| 2 | Encourage high quality housing in suitable areas that can accommodate a variety of lifestyles, households, ages, market preferences, and incomes. |
| 3 | Support placement of compatible commercial uses and community services that integrate access to daily needs into residential neighborhoods. |
| 4 | Promote mixed-use development within appropriate land use classifications. |
| 5 | Guide a greater diversity of housing types and densities, retail and commercial centers, and employment opportunities into identified growth areas where significant change is foreseeable. |
| 6 | Support the provision of appropriate transitions between sites having distinct changes in types or intensities of land uses. |
Where To Find More
Land Use & Growth Framework The Land Use & Growth Framework provides further guidance to ensure growth and development in Gilbert occurs responsibly, and in ways that contribute to the Vision and Themes of this General Plan. This framework further details the physical layout, structure and organization of development within Gilbert using Land Use and Growth Area Maps.
Character Areas Framework The Character Areas Framework provides additional guidance for specific geographic areas of Town that require more detailed recommendations and guidance than other areas due to special characteristics or circumstances of each area. Each Character Area provides more detailed direction and includes unique goals and policies to guide the character and form of development for each area.
⬚ figure
Originally the Reber Family Homestead and later Johnson Family Farm, Agritopia is a neighborhood built upon New Urbanist principles with strong community values. The village has developed into a nationally renowned community where people of all ages can live, work, and play with a diversity of land uses, housing types, and public spaces that all pay homage to the area's rich agricultural past.
Gilbert’s identity or “sense of place” is significantly shaped by the physical form, design and architectural style of the Town’s built environment. Residents care about this identity and want to live somewhere that they can take pride in calling home. The Town also wants to make a positive impression with visitors, creating interesting places that people remember and want to revisit. In the future, Gilbert will continue to be a vibrant community for residents and visitors by advancing the Town’s desire for high-quality development and redevelopment.
Click on the Policy number for expanded Policy description.
| 7 | Preserve and maintain Gilbert’s attractive appearance and quality of development that provide a sense of place. |
| 8 | Proactively improve the public realm to support a pedestrian friendly, high-quality and distinctive built environment. |
| 9 | In areas of Town that have a consistent design character, encourage the design of new development to maintain and support the existing character. |
| 10 | Guide development, especially in lower density residential areas, to minimize outdoor light pollution. |
| 11 | Encourage the reduction of the Urban Heat Island Effect. |
| 12 | Encourage substantial drought tolerant landscaping in public and private projects to maintain a heavily landscaped feel to the community while reducing the consumption of water. |
| 24 | Leverage the arts and support creative placemaking by facilitating the integration of artwork in public and publicly accessible spaces. |
| 32 | Design roadways to safely and efficiently accomodate multiple modes of travel while creating attractive corridors. |
Gilbert has many active and unique places that offer citizens and visitors the opportunity to gather and have memorable experiences. Establishing and maintaining vibrant gathering places like the Heritage District, Agritopia, and the Riparian Preserve at Water Ranch are cornerstones of Gilbert. As the Town moves forward, Gilbert will foster efforts to create great places that cater to a variety of preferences at the neighborhood and town-wide levels.
Policies: Click on the Policy number for expanded Policy description.
| 3 | Support placement of compatible commercial uses and community services that integrate access to daily needs into residential neighborhoods. |
| 4 | Promote mixed-use development within appropriate land use classifications. |
| 5 | Guide a greater diversity of housing types and densities, retail and commercial centers, and employment opportunities into identified growth areas where significant change is foreseeable. |
| 7 | Preserve and maintain Gilbert’s attractive appearance and quality of development that provide a sense of place. |
| 8 | Proactively improve the public realm to support a pedestrian friendly, high-quality and distinctive built environment. |
| 13 | Apply principles that ensure a safe and welcoming environment when designing individual structures or master planned developments. |
| 14 | Connect neighborhoods, retail and employment areas with a system of pedestrian and bicycle routes and trails. |
| 15 | Promote a variety of well-designed and maintained public and private parks and open spaces that will encourage and support community interaction and recreational activity for all ages. |
Heritage District Redevelopment Plan Review plans, goals and policies that focus on establishing coordinated efforts between the public and private sectors for the continued redevelopment of the Heritage District.
Character Guidance Chapter 6 Review specific goals, policies, and guidelines associated with unique character areas located throughout Gilbert.
Heritage District As the Historic Downtown of Gilbert, the Heritage District has become a vibrant epicenter for activity within the town. The various restaurants, shops, and public spaces make the Heritage District an excellent gathering place for events such as the Gilbert Farmer’s Market and Art Walk.
⬚ figure
The residential development boom over the last thirty years laid the fabric for Gilbert’s neighborhoods today, including several of the best designed master planned communities in the East Valley. In the future, these neighborhoods will still maintain their prominence in the community and efforts must be made to promote and enhance them as they age.
Click on the Policy number for expanded Policy description.
| 6 | Support the provision of appropriate transitions between sites having distinct changes in type or intensity of land uses. |
| 16 | Recognize, sustain, and promote the quality and character of existing residential neighborhoods as they mature, and as new development occurs nearby. |
| 17 | Ensure for the conservation and maintenance of existing housing and encourage reinvestment. |
| 18 | Facilitate the activation, redevelopment, or revitalization of Gilbert’s aging or under-utilized commercial and industrial properties and structures. |
| 19 | Support infill development that is designed to acknowledge the surrounding context. |
The composition of Gilbert’s existing residents and desired future workforce have characteristics such as family size, income, age, and tastes that require diverse housing choices. To accommodate projected population and employment growth, Gilbert will guide new high quality housing options in strategic locations for households with different lifestyle preferences and needs.
Click on the Policy number for expanded Policy description.
| 1 | Ensure the Town maintains a land use framework that supports a highly livable community through the efficient use of land and resources. |
| 2 | Encourage high quality housing in suitable areas that can accommodate a variety of lifestyles, households, ages, market preferences, and incomes. |
| 4 | Promote mixed-use development within appropriate land use classifications. |
| 5 | Guide a greater diversity of housing types and densities, retail and commercial centers, and employment opportunities into identified growth areas where significant change is foreseeable. |
| 17 | Ensure the conservation and maintenance of existing housing and encourage reinvestment. |
| 19 | Support infill development that is designed to acknowledge the surrounding context, while supporting other plan policies. |
| 22 | Enhance downtown livability through live/work, shopping, cultural and recreational opportunities in the Heritage District. |
Where To Find More
Policy Summaries Chapter 5 Learn more about the policies you are most interested in and how they apply to other strategies in the 2020 General Plan
Plan for Action Chapter 7 Gain more information about how each policy will be accomplished
⬚ figure
Past structures and development such as the Gilbert Water Tower, Gilbert Historical Museum, Morrison Ranch Silos, and Agritopia offer visual reminders of the eclectic and innovative nature of Gilbert's past eras of growth. Through recognizing the significance of the Town's local historical resources and community culture, Gilbert will continue to foster a sense of place and preserve the Town's heritage.
HD South now occupies what was originally Gilbert Elementary School in 1913. As the oldest standing building in the town and the only one on the National Historic Register, HD South houses the Gilbert Historical Museum and the Gilbert Historical Society.
Policies: Click on the Policy number for expanded Policy description.
| 20 | Support the identification, stewardship and preservation of historic resources, properties and districts. |
| 21 | Promote methods and techniques that acknowledge Gilbert's tangible and intangible cultural heritage. |
| 23 | Support the art community and creative economy by raising awareness of and promoting the value of local arts and culture. |
| 24 | Leverage the arts and support creative placemaking by facilitating the integration of artwork in public and publicly accessible spaces. |
Gilbert has a long history of valuing and encouraging community and civic participation. The Town will continue to invest in this “community capital” — that is the collective knowledge, skills and talent that Gilbert residents can offer when given a platform to connect — and create a significant benefit for future generations.
Click on the Policy number for expanded Policy description.
| 15 | Promote a variety of well-designed and maintained public and private parks and open spaces that will encourage and support community interaction and recreational activity for all ages. |
| 25 | Expand and promote opportunities for all residents to connect socially and participate fully in the vitality of Gilbert. |
| 26 | Encourage open and equitable public and neighborhood engagement when shaping community quality of life decisions. |
Gilbert Days Festival and Parade Featuring a parade, rodeo and marathon, Gilbert Days is the premiere annual event celebrating the town’s heritage.
⬚ figure
Gilbert is a growing Town with broad appeal, and the popularity of the Town should not be taken lightly. Gilbert is fortunate to be in a position where the future growth of the Town is positive. As Gilbert continues to prosper, it should promote strategies to ensure growth occurs responsibly in ways that contribute to furthering the Vision and Themes of this General Plan.
The Land Use Map describes the long-term, physical development pattern desired for Gilbert. The map organizes the Town’s land use structure and character using a number of land use classifications. These land use classifications describe the character intended for each area identified on the Land Use Map, and are further explained in the following pages. Each land use classification is color coded to correspond to the map. Densities for each land use classification are based on gross land area. Gross land area includes open space and recreation areas, street rights-of-way, and drainage areas and schools (if dedicated) within the boundaries of the development.
The land use classification boundaries shown on the Land Use Map follow property lines, drainage corridors, canals, streets and Town limits. Where development exists, these demarcation lines are precise and variations are not allowed unless the Land Use Map is amended. Where development is proposed on vacant land, the Planning Commission may approve a reconfiguration of the boundaries of the various land use classifications to form a viable neighborhood design, as long as there is no net change in the amount of land in each classification.
For site development regulations and purpose, refer to the Land Development Code (LDC). The LDC also notes non-residential land uses permitted in residential zoning districts. A Planned Area Development (PAD) overlay zoning district may permit zoning districts other than noted above upon finding that the overall density is consistent with the General Plan land use classification, and per the provisions of a PAD established in the Land Development Code.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
| --- | Gilbert Planning Boundary |
| +++ | Union Pacific RR |
| /// | Canal |
| Land Use Classifications | |
| Residential > 0 - 1 DU/Acre | |
| Residential > 1 - 2 DU/Acre | |
| Residential > 2 - 3.5 DU/Acre | |
| Residential > 3.5 - 5 DU/Acre | |
| Residential > 5 - 8 DU/Acre | |
| Residential > 8 - 14 DU/Acre | |
| Residential > 14 - 25 DU/Acre | |
| Residential > 25 - 50 DU/Acre | |
| Neighborhood Commercial (NC) | |
| General Commercial (GC) | |
| Regional Commercial (RC) | |
| Village Center (VC) | |
| Neighborhood Office (NO) | |
| General Office (GO) | |
| Industrial (I) | |
| Public Facility/Institutional (PF/I) | |
| Utility/Transportation Corridor (U/TC) | |
| Parks/Open Space (P/OS) |
⬚ figure
Residential > 0 - 1 DU/Acre (SF-43,SF-35) The Residential >0-1 DU/AC classification designates areas for very low-density single-family residential development of a semi-rural character. Non-commercial agricultural uses may be located in these areas. (Typical corresponding zoning districts with this land use classification: SF-43, SF- 35).
Residential > 1 - 2 DU/Acre (SF-35,SF-15) The Residential >1-2 DU/AC classification designates areas for low-density single-family residential neighborhood development. (Typical corresponding zoning districts with this land use classification: SF-35, SF-15).
Residential > 2 - 3.5 DU/Acre (SF-15,SF-10,SF-8,SF-7) The Residential >2-3.5 DU/AC classification designates areas for suburban single-family residential neighborhood development. (Typical corresponding zoning districts with this land use classification: SF-15, SF-10, SF-8, SF-7).
Residential > 3.5 - 5 DU/Acre (SF-10,SF-8,SF-7,SF-6) The Residential >3.5-5 DU/AC classification designates areas for urban density single-family neighborhood residential development. (Typical corresponding zoning districts with this land use classification: SF-10, SF-8, SF-7, SF-6). uses.
Residential > 5 - 8 DU/Acre (SF-6,SF-D,SF-A) The Residential >5-8 DU/AC classification designates areas for higher density detached and attached residential uses. (Typical corresponding zoning districts with this land use classification: SF-6, SF-D, SF-A).
Residential > 8 - 14 DU/Acre (SF-D, SF-A, MF/L) The Residential >8-14 DU/AC classification designates areas for higher density, often multifamily, residential uses. (Typical corresponding zoning districts with this land use classification: SF-D, SF-A, MF/L).
Residential > 14 - 25 DU/Acre (MF/M) The Residential >14-25 DU/AC classification designates areas for higher density multifamily residential uses such as condominiums, multi-story apartments and specialty residential uses. (Typical corresponding zoning district with this land use classification: MF-M).
Residential > 25 - 50 DU/Acre (HVC, GVC, MF/H) The Residential >25-50 DU/AC classification designates areas for very high density, multifamily residential uses including multi-story apartments, condominium, townhouse, loft apartment and congregate care/senior living product types. (This density may be permitted in the Heritage Village Center (HVC), the Gateway Village Center (GVC) and Multifamily High (MF/H) zoning districts.
⬚ figure
The Neighborhood Commercial classification designates areas for limited shopping and basic services for the immediate area and are generally no larger than five (5) acres in size. Neighborhood Commercial uses are typically, but not always, located along major collectors or arterials. Small scale retail and service uses under 25,000 square feet per user or stand-alone building are permitted. (Typical corresponding zoning districts with this land use classification: NC).
The General Commercial classification designates areas for the commercial and service needs of residents in the surrounding area. General Commercial areas are identified by freestanding retail, office and commercial uses that may be developed as individual projects, or projects may be developed under unified control with a common architectural theme and shared parking. Loft residential and mixed-used development are allowed within this land use classification. General Commercial parcels are typically located along arterial streets. (Typical corresponding zoning districts with this land use classification: CC, SC, GC).
The Regional Commercial classification designates areas for a broad range of high intensity uses emphasizing retail commercial uses. There is no maximum size for any use. The designation includes uses permitted in all other commercial categories plus regional shopping centers, hospital/medical centers, hotels/motels and mixed-use developments. The Regional Commercial classification may also accommodate high density residential development where residential uses are located above the ground floor of a retail/ office building. Regional Commercial serves a broad market area larger than the Town. Regional Commercial designations are thirty or more acres and are located at freeway/arterial intersections or at intersections of arterials with Roads of Regional Significance. (Typical corresponding zoning districts with this land use classification: RC).
The Village Center classification designates areas for classical mixed-use, pedestrian-oriented core activities which consist of retail shops, restaurants, offices, lodging, entertainment, public plazas and very high density residential units. Village Center offers the opportunity for diverse patronage served by all modes of transportation. The pedestrian oriented core will initially be served by shared parking lots and ultimately by shared parking structures. Residential uses within the Village Center area will range up to 50 du/acre, often with commercial or office uses on the ground floor. (Typical corresponding zoning districts with this land use classification: HVC, GVC).
⬚ figure
The Neighborhood Office classification designates areas for small-scale, single story office uses and complexes adjacent to existing or planned neighborhoods. It is a transitional classification between residential and more intense commercial uses and can buffer residential uses from arterial streets. (Typical corresponding zoning districts with this land use classification: NO).
The General Office classification designates areas for large scale, single or multi-story medical, professional, general or service-type office, and light industrial uses, including high technology and research and development firms. This classification encourages an attractive campus-style environment. Developments within this classification may include employee-oriented onsite amenities, loft residential and accessory uses allowing for a mixed-use environment. (Typical corresponding zoning districts with this land use classification: BP, GO, GBC).
The Industrial classification designates areas for a variety of industrial activities, ranging from light industrial uses, such as assembly, light manufacturing, warehousing, offices, contractors’ yards, laboratories, and research and development firms to general industrial uses such as heavy utility, truck terminals and manufacturing facilities. Properly screened outdoor storage of materials, equipment and vehicles may occur. (Typical corresponding zoning districts with this land use classification: LI, GI).
⬚ figure
Public Facility/ Institutional (PF/I)
The Public Facility/Institutional classification designates areas for public and quasi-public ownership, including administrative offices, corporation yards, police and fire stations, public and private schools, colleges, hospitals, libraries, post office facilities, cultural centers and similar uses. This category also includes traditional utility service uses such as wastewater treatment plants, water treatment plants, storage reservoirs and tanks, well sites, telephone company sites, electric substation sites, electric generating/ receiving stations, etc. (Typical corresponding zoning districts with this land use classification: PF/I).
Utility/ Transportation Corridor (U/TC)
The Utility/Transportation Corridor classification designates areas for canals, railroads, rail, power lines, utility easements and the Loop 202 Santan Freeway corridor. These areas may include multi- modal trails systems, open spaces and green belts. (Typical corresponding zoning districts with this land use classification: PF/I).
Parks/ Open Space (P/OS)
The Parks/Open Space classification designates areas for parks, riparian areas, public and private golf courses, including ancillary functions such as maintenance facilities, clubhouses, driving ranges and proshops, drainage/ wash/retention areas that will remain in public or open space use whether publicly or privately owned. (Typical corresponding zoning districts with this land use classification: PF/I).
Growth Areas in Gilbert are specifically located in areas that already have adequate infrastructure constructed and multi-modal transportation options planned to support a variety of land use types. Gilbert’s Growth Areas are focused on economic sustainability and therefore concentrated in employment and commerce centers. The developments within the Growth Areas should integrate a variety of employment options supported by a mixture of land uses.
The Town of Gilbert strongly supports mixed-use developments. The mixed-use designation is defined as a coordinated Development Plan with a functional integration of residential and non-residential uses, where a variety of different living activities (live, work, shop, and play) are in close proximity (walking distance) to most residents, resulting in measurable reductions in traffic impacts. Designated mixed-use developments are encouraged within the Growth Areas, but may also be located in other areas that provide a multi-modal transportation network to support the intensity of development. The mixed-use environment can be developed horizontally, vertically or a combination of both. If designed horizontally, the Town expects that the project be constructed so that all land uses are represented.
The Growth Areas within Gilbert each have their own economic focus, character and infrastructure. It is expected that mixed-use developments would be designed to utilize and amplify the Growth Area’s attributes. If appropriate, the high density residential component of a mixed-use project should be designed as an integral element of the development concept and produce a unique living environment distinctive to the project.
To further mixed-use growth and density within the Growth Areas, the Town encourages energy efficient projects and projects that utilize the Vertical Development Overlay Zoning District.
Gilbert’s eight defined growth areas are illustrated on the accompanying Growth Areas Map and are further described on the following pages.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
LEGEND
| --- | Gilbert Planning Boundary |
| + + + | Union Pacific RR |
| TTTT | Canal |
Growth Area
| /// | Heritage District |
| /// | Baseline Medical |
| /// | Central 202 Core |
| /// | Gilbert and the 202 |
| /// | Power Road |
| /// | Gateway Village Center |
| /// | Val Vista Medical |
| /// | Northwest |
⬚ figure
The area is generally defined as one-third of a mile south of Guadalupe Road on the north, extends one-quarter mile to the east and west of Gilbert Road and one-eighth of a mile south of Elliot Road. The Heritage District Growth Area is the historic downtown center of Gilbert and is covered by a Redevelopment Plan. It is also designated as a Character Area within this General Plan. The adopted Redevelopment Plan covers land use, architectural character, streetscape and other issues specific to the downtown. It also sets forth a unique review process required for this area. The Heritage District is a prime location for infill development ranging from commercial to high density residential to tourism/hospitality uses.
⬚ figure
Located between one-quarter mile west and one-quarter mile east of Higley Road and between US 60 and one-half mile south of Baseline Road, the Baseline Medical Growth Area is evolving around the existing hospital and cancer treatment and research center. Medical offices, hotels and support amenities are all critical to the success of the vibrant growth of this area. With little vacant land remaining within this area, it is imperative that quality mixed-use projects be well designed to maximize land potential. The Town highly encourages the use of the Vertical Development Overlay Zoning District as a vehicle to achieve maximum density.
⬚ figure
The Central 202 Core Growth Area is generally bounded by the Loop 202 Santan Freeway to the south and east, Ray Road to the north and Val Vista Road to the west. The Central 202 Core Growth Area includes the Santan Village Regional Mall and several retail power centers. This area is capable of supporting concentrated development comprised of a variety of land uses including commercial, high rise office, tourism uses and business parks. The area may also accommodate high density residential development where residential uses are closely integrated with retail/office uses in a compact development containing urban amenities. The use of the Vertical Development Overlay Zoning District is highly encouraged within this centrally located business core.
⬚ figure
The Gilbert and the 202 Growth Area is located east of Gilbert Road extending one-half mile past Lindsey Road between Pecos Road and one-quarter mile south of Germann Road. This Growth Area is on the western boundary of the Town of Gilbert, adjacent to the Chandler Airpark. The Growth Area includes the existing commercial centers located at the Gilbert Road and Loop 202 Santan Freeway interchange. The primary focus of economic growth within this area is general office, business park and light industrial land uses that have a need for quick freeway access or proximity to the airpark.
⬚ figure
The Power Road Growth Area is located one-half mile west of Power Road, one-half mile north of Elliot and one-quarter mile north of William’s Field Road. The Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport, directly to the east, is the catalyst for development within this area. With quick transportation access to the Santan Freeway and the Power Road Corridor, the focus of this Growth Area is industrial and business park employment supported by commercial shopping centers.
⬚ figure
The Gateway Village Center is generally one-third of a mile to the north of and one-third of a mile south of Williams Field Road, from the railroad to the west and Power Road to the east. This area is planned with a wide variety of land uses in a “Village Core”, pedestrian-oriented design with close proximity to future multi-modal transportation nodes. The area is the “Gateway” into Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport and the Arizona State University Polytechnic Campus. The village core focuses primarily on office and commercial employment opportunities supported by commercial and residential mixed-use projects. The Gateway Village Center, also known as Cooley Station, is part of the Gateway Character Area described in Chapter 10 of this General Plan.
⬚ figure
The Val Vista Medical Growth Area is located south of the Loop 202 Santan Freeway. It extends one-quarter mile west of Val Vista Road, east to Greenfield Road and Queen Creek Road to the south. The hospital is the economic catalyst within this growth area. The hospital, located southeast of the Val Vista Road and Loop 202 Santan Freeway interchange has spurred growth in the medical office, medical research and rehabilitation/care facilities. Support amenities to the above noted uses are quickly being developed. The Town anticipates that this area will continue to grow with medical office, general office and business park land uses supported by mixed-use, commercial and hospitality uses.
⬚ figure
The Northwest Growth Area is located south of the US 60 from Baseline Road to just south of Elliot Road, and extending from Arizona Avenue to Cooper Road. The Northwest Growth Area was Gilbert’s first major employment area and has the largest concentration of jobs of all the growth areas. This geographic area has attracted industry leading anchor institutions and companies primarily associated with science, technology, engineering, and occupations in aerospace, manufacturing, and professional services industries. This growth area is characterized by large industrial and office oriented developments and infill parcels that are transit-accessible and have attracted a portfolio of housing, office, industrial, and retail uses. A focus on a unified vision, infrastructure, investment, development and quality of life will ensure the area remains a vibrant hub for employment, redevelopment and innovation within the community.
Character Areas are specific geographic areas that possess unique or special characteristics or have the potential to evolve into a unique area, unlike any other in the Town. The areas may also have certain development issues, within or outside the Town's planning boundary, that makes the area unique, for example areas influenced by the development of Phoenix-Mesa-Gateway Airport and the original downtown area.
The following Character Areas are intended to define unique places in the Gilbert Planning Area. Each of the following Character Areas contain different goals and policies. These do not replace the land use policies or map designations in other parts of the General Plan, but merely provide definition and detail. Specific goals, policies and guidelines associated with each Character Area can be found in Chapter 6.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
| LEGEND | |
|---|---|
| --- | Gilbert Planning Boundary |
| ++++ | Union Pacific RR |
| TTTTT | Canal |
| Character Areas | |
| Gateway | |
| Heritage District | |
| Morrison Ranch | |
| Santan |
⬚ figure
The Gilbert Heritage District is the historic and symbolic center of the community. It offers opportunity for the adaptation of significant properties to uses that will have a positive impact on the adjacent residential and commercial sectors. By maintaining appropriate uses, design and architecture in the District, the area will remain the community’s link with the past and future.
Guided by the Redevelopment Plan and the Heritage District Design Guidelines, development and reinvestment is highly encouraged in the Heritage District in order to maximize the economic potential of properties, rehabilitate substandard buildings, eliminate blighting influences, improve parking, beautify streetscapes and allow the assembly of land for new development. As new construction and rehabilitation activities occur, the Redevelopment Plan and Design Guidelines will serve as a catalyst for the improvement of other properties. Together, this will help to attract more businesses and customers, thereby increasing the economic vitality of the area. Both documents should be referenced for comprehensive information regarding the Heritage District Character Area. The Gilbert Redevelopment Plan was first adopted in 1991 and updated in 2001, 2008, and 2018.
The Gateway Character Area is approximately 4,300 acres (seven (7) square miles) in size. The Gateway Character Area identifies desirable physical characteristics that will enhance Gilbert’s unique identity and encourage development of traditional neighborhoods. It provides traditional village/neighborhood design concepts which are reminiscent of the heritage of Gilbert. It promotes pedestrian, bicycle, transit-oriented design and integrates residential, commercial, and employment land uses. It also affords an opportunity for small-scale urban agriculture.
The Gateway Area will consist of a traditional, mixed-used pedestrian friendly village center, with commercial shops, offices and loft apartments at the core of the village center, surrounded by traditional residential neighborhoods, schools and parks, as well as nearby major commercial and employment areas including the Arizona State University (ASU) Polytechnic Campus, the Chandler-Gilbert Community College/ Williams Campus, the Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport and the Santan Freeway.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
The Morrison Ranch Character Area is a 1,527 acre (2.3 square miles) mixed-use master planned community that incorporates the functional, aesthetic, economic and social factors associated with livable communities. The development plan for Morrison Ranch was originally adopted in 1988 and has been amended over time as conditions warrant. Development of the area continues today.
Morrison Ranch reflects the historic rural atmosphere associated with the Town of Gilbert. It utilizes reclaimed water to enable the landscaping to include turf, trees and wide setbacks to establish a rural agricultural community theme. Within Morrison Ranch, multiple rows of trees line the streets, sidewalks and parks, creating a shaded environment for pedestrians and vehicles. All landscape, recreation and open spaces within common areas are to be maintained by the Homeowners Association. A network of trails and sidewalks within the landscaped open spaces connect homes, schools, community facilities and workplaces. Elementary schools are located in central locations adjacent to greenbelts and recreational facilities. A variety of residential densities are provided throughout the community.
Morrison Town Center features a multi-use combination of retail, commercial, office, restaurant and recreational services linked to the existing Morrison Ranch headquarters and grain silos that set the rural theme. The Power Technology Center offers a variety of multi-use commercial, business park and industrial sites along Power Road.
⬚ figure
In 2000, the Santan Character Area (SCA) was created to capture the unique qualities of this sixteen (16) square mile growing area. The character area serves as a tool to recognize the importance of the rural agricultural heritage of South Gilbert.
Service oriented infill development is just beginning to respond to the SCA population growth. Schools, churches and residential rooftops are now dominant in the area. There is still significant interest from the development community to continue residential construction in the SCA. Containing the greatest concentration of undeveloped land, there is increased development pressure on this part of Gilbert.
Multi-use trails, desert washes and proximity to the Santan Mountains make the area unique. The SCA continues to require special attention due to the land use issues related to residential and non-residential development. Residents have expressed concern about the lack of services and commercial amenities, yet desire a pattern of development consistent with the rural lifestyle and open spaces that characterize the Santan area.
The people of the SCA envision the area as a combination of rural and suburban neighborhoods that enjoy the natural environment including wildlife and small scale agricultural activities. Emphasis is placed on outdoor living enjoyment and the ability to live and play in a secure and safe environment. Low and medium density residential development blends with farming, trails, open space, and commercial uses to makeup the character.
Character Guidance Chapter 6 There are specific guidelines for each Character Area. These do not replace the land use policies or map designations in other parts of the General Plan, but merely provide definition and detail. For a more in depth look at Character Area Guidelines see Chapter 6.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
Opportunity is essential to every thriving community. Individuals and families prosper in safe communities that offer great schools, exceptional public services, diverse recreational amenities, high-quality healthcare options, a healthy natural environment and a strong business climate. As the Town continues to grow and mature, it’s this physical and philosophical foundation on which Gilbert was built that will continue to serve the community’s needs and maintain a high standard of living. The focus of this chapter is to create sustainable and positive outcomes that build upon the Town’s overall high quality of life through exploring and welcoming new OPPORTUNITY in Gilbert.
This chapter is organized around five key goals: Encourage Job Growth; Promote Health and Wellness; Maintain Public Safety; Manage Our Infrastructure; and Protect Our Natural Environment.
⬚ figure
Gilbert has exponentially grown into a renowned community with excellent schools, jobs and public amenities. While Gilbert is well positioned to leverage the Town’s strengths and current quality of life to continue to attract premier businesses, housing and entertainment options as well as provide valuable public services, it is also important to monitor the Town’s growth outcomes to ensure they align with the stated Vision and Values of this Plan. To this end, the following assessment is provided to understand specific trends and influences that are impacting Gilbert today in order to inform the development of this chapter’s goals and supporting policies in a way that will minimize missed opportunities and prevent the pursuit of short-term gains at the expense of long-term success. These assessment findings are discussed in more detail in Appendix A.
Gilbert’s high median income level is a strong indicator of the community’s spending power and general economic health. As the Town looks to attract new business, especially retail, the strong economic standing and capacity of its residents plays an important role in the recruitment process.
When asked what type of development Gilbert should encourage over the next twenty (20) years to accommodate projected population growth, 55% of survey respondents identified Job Creating Uses as most important. Gilbert has strong demographics for future employment growth. When compared to Maricopa County overall, residents in Gilbert are, on average, higher educated, better paid and include a larger segment of the population in its prime working years. Future forecasts of employment growth remain positive for Gilbert, particularly within the health, professional services, and technology sectors. From this perspective, the Town should be well positioned to capitalize on its past performance and existing assets to extend its economic growth.
What type of development should Gilbert encourage over the next 20 years to accommodate projected population growth?
⬚ figure
2020 Gilbert General Plan Update Community Survey Response
In line with the growth of high-tech industries in Arizona, Gilbert has emerging employment clusters in Life Sciences, Aerospace and Aviation, Clean Technology and Renewable Energy and Advanced Business Services. In addition, Oncology, Stem Cell Therapy, Biofuel and Solar technology, as well as satellite communication and electro-mechanical manufacturing firms have chosen to locate in Gilbert for the growing strength of the community’s educated workforce and prime positioning within the Greater Phoenix Region. Companies such as GoDaddy, Banner Health and Dignity Health account for some of the top employers in the town with other notable firms being Deloitte, Silent-Aire, Morgan Stanley, Northrop Grumman, Merrill Lynch and Isagenix. With the exponential 58% growth in bioscience jobs in Arizona from 2002-2016 (The Flinn Foundation) and 15% projected job growth from 2017-2026 in Advanced Business Services (Emsi), these sectors are primed to be an even stronger backbone to Gilbert’s economy.
The Town of Gilbert is served by four public-school districts including the Gilbert Public School District and portions of the Higley Unified School District to the east, Mesa Public School District to the north, as well as the Chandler Unified School District to the south and west. The Gilbert Public School District was named #4 in the Top 500 School Districts in America in 2018 (only six Arizona school districts made it on the list) and all high schools located within Gilbert consistently maintain graduation rates above 90%.
There are forty-six (46) primary and secondary (elementary, middle and high school) public schools within the Town of Gilbert, and sixteen (16) magnet or charter schools. As of 2017, total enrollment for the Town of Gilbert K-12 was 55,106, with 3,918 enrolled in preschool. This reflects a 23% increase in K-12 enrollment since 2010. However, between 2010 and 2017 combined enrollment of preschool and kindergarten aged children has declined by 2,135 students. The total increase in K-12 student enrollment aligns with the Town’s overall population growth between 2010 and 2017. However, the decline of preschool and kindergarten enrollment within Gilbert is an indicator that fewer younger families are moving to Gilbert.
The Gilbert Public School District was named #4 in the Top 500 School Districts in America in 2018
According to the ACS approximately 15,761 Gilbert residents were enrolled in some form of college as of 2017. Furthermore, nearly half (43%) of Gilbert’s residents have a bachelor or graduate/ professional degree, over a third (36%) of the population have some college education or an associate degree, and only 3% of residents over the age of 25 have less than a high school diploma. In comparison, these education attainment levels outperform Maricopa County overall. This educational profile of Gilbert is also indicative of a highly skilled workforce, which is strongly associated with higher income levels and an increased ability to attract top employers. In turn, these indicators place positive influence on the overall structure and performance of the K-12 education system within the Town. This self-supporting cycle of improvement justifies the importance of promoting economic and educational excellence within Gilbert.
Educational Attainment Source: 2017 ACS
⬚ figure
Median Household Income Source: 2017 ACS
⬚ figure
| GILBERT | MARICOPA COUNTY | |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | $84,699 | $62,223 |
| 2000 | $68,032 | $45,358 |
Gilbert’s public education system continues to be well ranked within Arizona and nationally as delivering high quality education. Additionally, with large higher education opportunities located in or immediately adjacent to Gilbert including Park University, University of Arizona – Nursing Program, Northern Arizona University, Chandler-Gilbert Community College and Arizona State University Polytechnic Campus, the flow of educated young people into Gilbert’s workforce continues to grow strong.
⬚ figure
Classified as 30 acres or more are designed to accommodate a wide variety of unique and standard recreation facilities and activities for individuals and groups.
⬚ figure
Classified as 10 to 30 acres in size and typically include a unique facility or attraction. Developed for individual and medium sized group activities.
⬚ figure
Classified as 1 to 10 acres in size to accommodate individual and small group recreational facilities.1
⬚ figure
No specific size range and can have a singular or unique function.
Gilbert enjoys over 600 acres of dedicated parkland and preserves within the Town limits. The Town also maintains over thirty-two (32) miles of shared use, paved paths and seventeen (17) miles of unpaved trails. An additional 25.5 miles of trails are proposed and not yet improved. The Town also offers a wide variety of classes, programs and special events for people of all ages and abilities. The adjacent table lists parks, recreation and cultural facilities in Gilbert. All of these facilities are further detailed in the Town’s Parks, Recreation and Trails Master Plan (2014).
Town parks are located based on the service standards outlined in the Parks, Recreation and Trails Master Plan and are focused on providing access to all members of the community. Expansion of parks into new areas of growth are programed in a manner that is complimentary to existing services and standards as well as the recommendations of the 2015 Sports Field Needs Assessment. A combination of community input and the Needs Assessment most recently resulted in the development of phase one of the Gilbert Regional Park and Desert Sky Park in September 2019. Complete buildout of each park is planned to occur over multiple phases and will collectively add over 270 acres of new recreation and open space to Gilbert’s dedicated parkland.
This list only reflects public Neighborhood Parks. Parkway Improvement District (PKIDs) and Private Neighborhood Parks are not included. ↩
⬚ figure
The Town’s Community Centers serve as anchors to several parks and their surrounding neighborhoods within Gilbert. In addition to being locations for recreation and fitness, Gilbert’s Community Centers also provide social services, education opportunities, health initiatives and social gathering spaces. Current locations include: Gilbert Community Center/Senior Center, Freestone Recreation Center and McQueen Park & Activity Center.
There are two public libraries located within Gilbert. Each facility is operated as a branch of the Maricopa County Library District. In addition to materials in multiple formats, these facilities provide internet accessible, word processing and activity-based computers for all ages. Current locations include: Southeast Regional Library and Perry Branch Library.
Gilbert’s parks, open space, trails and recreation facilities are an important part of what makes the Town a desirable place to live. The Town is committed to the continued investment in and proactive stewardship of its public facilities. In the future, parks, trails, and recreation will continue to play an important role in meeting the needs of residents as well as contributing to the overall character of Gilbert. However, as the Town approaches buildout, the traditional focus on expansion of these critical community amenities will transition to a greater need for preservation, and in some area’s revitalization or replacement of facilities.
Gilbert is no stranger to accolades relative to health both locally and nationally. Healthy Arizona Worksites awarded the Town of Gilbert the Gold Award for Healthy Arizona Work Places in 2018 due to strong worksite wellness initiatives. Gilbert was also noted by the Phoenix Business Journal as having nine of the healthiest employers in the Valley and was listed as the 17th best community in the country for people with disabilities by Wallethub. The Town is also well served by a full complement of medical facilities, including Banner Gateway Hospital and MD Anderson Cancer Center along with Mercy Gilbert Medical Center and Gilbert Dignity Health General Hospital.
This holds true to data from a 2019 Mercy Gilbert Medical Center (MGMC) Community Health Needs Assessment. Within this assessment a Community Needs Index (CNI), developed by Dignity Health and Truven Health Analytics, identified the severity of health disparity for each zip code in Gilbert based on a select group of barriers to healthcare access. These barriers include income, language, educational, insurance and housing barriers. According to the CNI results illustrated in the Community Index Map (below), all zip codes within Gilbert’s Planning Area display a moderate (mid) to low risk of barriers to healthcare access. In addition to healthcare access, Gilbert residents also tend to be more physically healthy. Data from the Center for Disease Control (CDC) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System displays Gilbert with low rates of obesity and high rates of physical activity (see Figure 4 and 5). Conversely, a 2012 MGMC Community Needs Assessment reported that adult mental health conditions accounted for 75% of visits to MGMC and reported in 2014, emergency rooms recorded a 56% increase in youth coming to emergency rooms for substance or alcohol related issues over a one-year period.
⬚ figure
Community Needs Index Map Mercy Gilbert Community Health Needs Assessment (2018)
Lifestyle and environment are prime contributors to an individual’s physical and mental health. Gilbert’s support for public health through environmental design is evident in the Town’s extensive parks and trails network. With ample access to recreational amenities, residents of Gilbert have greater opportunities for staying active and further contributing to higher positive health achievements. Town resources and social service organizations are also prevalent within Gilbert and provide residents with information, resource, referral, advocacy, and counseling assistance. One example of this collaboration includes the recently opened Heritage Center- Wellness, Education and Resource Center, which provides access to medical, dental, counseling and other social services through programs supported by AZCEND, Dignity Health, Mission of Mercy and Southwest Behavioral Health.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
The safety of a community is important to health and well-being. People exposed to violence and crime are subject to increased risk for long-term behavioral and mental health disorders (i.e. anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder); are more prone to carry out a crime once exposed to a crime; and are more likely to experience physical trauma (i.e. death, injury and disability). Gilbert is one of the safest communities in the State, exhibiting significantly lower instances of property and violent crimes than other comparable communities in the East Valley.
Overall, a substantial portion of the population in Gilbert enjoy relative prosperity. According to the 2017 ACS, only 6.2% of the population and 4.7% of families in Gilbert are living in poverty. This is considerably lower than the County rate of 16.5% of the population. Although, this does equate to over 14,000 Gilbert residents living below the federal poverty level.
Gilbert appeals to many as an active, happy, healthy place to live perhaps now more than ever. While Gilbert exhibits high accomplishments relative to health measures overall, consideration should still be given to the experiences of the smaller segment of Gilbert residents who may be experiencing challenges that diminish their quality of life. There is emerging consensus that communities that are in good physical shape and have access to, and know where to obtain, critical health and emergency services, are more resilient with shorter recovery times when challenges arise. A healthier population is happier, more productive and often reduces the cost of various levels of government.
⬚ figure
Population growth can strain Gilbert’s natural systems. Higher population results in increased energy consumption, increased solid waste, increased traffic, increased air pollution and increased impervious surfaces, which has a cumulative effect on the Town’s overall environment. The Town seeks to balance the effects of a growing population with efforts to manage, conserve, and innovate to improve environmental quality and environmental health.
Gilbert is a recognized leader in water conservation. With significant programs for all water customer types, water efficiency is a key goal. This efficiency extends to the complete reuse of all reclaimed water through direct landscape use and groundwater recharge. By providing reclaimed water for landscape uses, demand on the potable water system is reduced. The recharge of the aquifer ensures that water that is unused today can be stored for the future. Additional best management practices the Town applies to promote water conservation include: offering water checkups (audits), educational landscape workshops and how to videos, ordinances for water efficient plumbing fixtures in new residential housing units and non-residential development, restrictions on the creation of CC&R’s that require the use of water intensive landscaping in new residential developments, encourage the limited use of turf and other water intensive landscaping in common areas of residential developments, promotion of the Water Wise Gilbert program and youth educational programming.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) for Gilbert identify notable floodplain areas generally along the Union Pacific Railroad (UPR) tracks and three main irrigation canals that traverse the Town. The East Maricopa County Floodway also bisects the southeastern part of Town. The Town has several regional flood control basins developed jointly with the Flood Control District of Maricopa County, which connect to storm sewers and outfalls. The Town continues to require private development to provide localized drainage and retention solutions that complement the regional flood control and drainage system(s).
Within urban areas of Gilbert, a large percentage of land is covered with structures and pavement which prevents underlying soil from having the ability to filter or biodegrade contaminants the way natural soils and permeable surfaces do. As water flows into the storm drain system it is not treated in a wastewater treatment plant. Rather this water flows directly into local waterways, neighborhood lakes and retention basins, many of which are located in Town community parks. Pollution carried into public spaces can be harmful to children, pets and the environment. Gilbert intends to continue complying with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality’s (ADEQ) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) General Permit requirements through preparing and implementing a Storm Water Management Program that will apply to capital projects and private development alike. This Program includes six Minimum Control Measures with best management practices for each: Public Education and Outreach, Public Participation/ Involvement, Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination, Construction Stormwater Runoff Controls, Post Construction Stormwater Management and Pollution Prevention.
Pollution prevention, the reduction or elimination of waste at the source, not only reduces pollution, but it can save money as well. Pollution prevention measures can also lead to a higher degree of environmental protection by reducing subsequent costs for disposal or cleanup of hazardous wastes and materials.
To support efforts to prevent pollution, Gilbert has an Environmental Compliance Program to respond to accidents and uncontained spills of hazardous materials and chemicals and to coordinate with Maricopa County Air Quality Department, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality and the Environmental Protection Agency with the purpose of safety, containment and clean-up.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
Gilbert has undertaken several environmental conservation efforts including the Town’s Riparian Preserve at Water Ranch, which is recognized as a premiere education and recreation resource.
The Town of Gilbert operates a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility open to the residents of Gilbert. The facility provides residents with a way to properly dispose of household products such as bleach, pesticides, herbicides, motor oil, tires, electronic wastes and many other household products that may pose a threat to human health or the environment. The program reduces the amount of hazardous material entering the sanitary sewer, storm drains and landfill and reduces illegal dumping of hazardous waste. Town Staff has worked with hazardous waste disposal contractors to ensure wastes are recycled to the best extent practical. Over 90% of the material collected is reused or recycled through one of the Towns vendors or internal paint reuse program.
With respect to large scale, commercial and industrial hazardous waste, Gilbert does not provide pick up or disposal service. Gilbert will, however, work with individuals, businesses and companies to identify private hazardous waste disposal sources.
Town Staff participates in various town-sponsored outreach events and posts information on the Town website and cable channel to encourage effective disposal of hazardous waste.
Healthy, breathable air is a regional resource, thus maintaining air quality is a responsibility shared by each of the local jurisdictions within Maricopa County. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has developed air quality standards for six criteria air pollutants. Two of the pollutants, particulate matter (PM) and ozone, are a concern for the region. Vehicles traveling on unpaved roads and residents burning wood in fireplaces and outdoor firepits create PM. Exhaust from cars is the most significant contributor to ozone. Meeting present and future air quality standards requires Gilbert to share in the responsibility of monitoring and participating in regional solutions. Such solutions include enhanced public transportation, improved and expanded opportunities for alternative transportation modes, infrastructure that supports telecommuting and green energy use.
Promoting awareness and appreciation for Arizona’s ecology not only represents Gilbert’s commitment to protecting the natural environment, but is also essential to the Towns ability to meet the growing needs of its residents and businesses as growth occurs. Gilbert has undertaken several environmental conservation efforts including the Town’s Riparian Preserve at Water Ranch, which is recognized as a premiere education and recreation resource. This 110 acre preserve includes 7 water recharge basins that are organized into various zones ranging from marshlands to native riparian and upland vegetation areas. Approximately 298 species of birds have been identified on site along with many other kinds of fish, amphibians, reptiles and mammals. Gilbert is also a Tree City USA community. Tree City USA is a national program intended to promote urban forestry in cities and towns across the country. Gilbert has met or exceeded the Tree City USA criteria and has been added to the list of 30 Arizona communities that have collectively planted over 6,300 trees. The social and environmental benefits of being a Tree City include improved air quality, increased shade and improved microclimates, reduction of urban heat island impacts and various psychological benefits associated with connecting / re-connecting with nature.
Gilbert’s cultural and historic resources consist of historic structures and agricultural implements. Most historic structures are located within the Heritage District and are a part of the Redevelopment Plan for that area. As additional structures are identified, they may be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places and should be analyzed to weigh the benefit of restoration and re-use.
Most archaeological remains that have been found, cataloged and analyzed to date have been determined to be insignificant by the State Historic Preservation Office. Since Gilbert has been a farming community, most of the land has been tilled on the surface layer. As land converts to other land uses greater care must be taken to address potential artifacts below this tilled surface layer. As artifacts are discovered, the State Historic Preservation Office must be notified and appropriate procedures followed. Incentives for redevelopment of areas to maintain historical or cultural significance may be considered.
Specific cultural resource issues expected to be of concern over the next twenty years include:
Coordination with the State Historic Preservation Office on archaeological findings.
Preservation of historic structures and artifacts, possibly including locations such as the Heritage District, Gilbert Museum, Water Tower, Gilbert School District Headquarters and Morrison Farmstead.
A key sustainability issue is energy creation and conservation. Electricity is provided to the Gilbert Planning Area by Salt River Project (SRP), with the exception of a four-square-mile area bounded by Guadalupe Road to the north, Warner Road to the south, Cooper Road to the west and Lindsay Road to the east which is served by Arizona Public Service (APS). As Arizona’s two largest and longest serving electric companies, SRP and APS have well established facilities to maintain a sufficient level of service for future electricity demand in the Planning Area and continue to expand their sustainable energy portfolio. To further the Town’s diversification of energy sources, Gilbert has been promoting alternative energy technologies like electric vehicles and solar power for homes and businesses.
The Arizona Geological Survey has mapped known earth fissure locations within Gilbert’s planning area as part of the Chandler Heights Study Area. This area is located in the extreme southern limits of Gilbert’s Planning Area south of Riggs Road between Val Vista Drive and Recker Road. In Arizona, earth fissures are generally associated with land subsidence. Extended groundwater withdrawal in an area may result in subsidence and the formation of new fissures or the extension of existing fissures. Consequently, while predicting earth fissure locations is not possible, minimizing their prevalence through managing the Town’s water resources and promoting water conservation to minimize groundwater withdrawal is proactive.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
Like most communities in the Phoenix-Metropolitan area, Gilbert’s urban environment generates and is subjected to noise from traffic, trains, airports, and construction and yard maintenance among other sources. In certain noise sensitive areas (e.g. homes, schools, and medical clinics) of Town, the diversity and mix of land uses presents a challenge relative to maintaining compatibility with noise generating sources. Major noise generating sources that impact land use and development within Gilbert include Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport, the Loop 202 Santan Freeway and US 60 Superstition Freeway. The Town has identified these sources which are shown on the Noise Exposure Map. Gilbert also recognizes the impacts from arterial roads and railroad operations, particularly at railway crossings. Due to the potential harmful impacts on health and quality of life caused by noise generating uses, the application of mitigation measures such as avigation easements for airport sources, coordination with UPRR, and noise attenuation for construction near identified noise sources are critical.
The Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Overlay Zoning District establishes Overflight Areas 1-3, which limits the location of Noise Sensitive Uses and requires enhanced building insulation to mitigate noise to specified minimum levels. The Santan Freeway Corridor Overlay Zoning District provides that noise sensitive uses locating within 300 ft. from the edge of right-of-way complete a Neighborhood Environmental Design Analysis and construct an 8 foot tall noise barrier to achieve an exterior noise reduction. Building construction must also meet established, reduced interior noise levels.
Gilbert is generally vulnerable to a range of threats including both natural (e.g. flood, drought, extreme temperatures, public health outbreak) and human-made hazards (e.g. terrorism, cyber-attack, energy disruption) so planning for the future is critical. Gilbert currently participates in the Maricopa County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. This 5-year update was officially adopted by Town Council on October 15, 2015. The goal of this mitigation plan is to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to life and property from natural hazard events and provide protection from the risks of human-made hazards to establish a comprehensive sense of well-being for residents and attract visitors and businesses to Gilbert.
Exhibit 5. Noise Exposure Map
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
Arizona Revised Statute requires cities and towns to identify current aggregate operations within their planning area as well as develop measures to preserve currently identified aggregates for future development and define policies to avoid incompatible land uses.
Following the review of available Arizona Geological Survey (AZGS) Mining Data, no existing aggregate sites were identified within the Town’s planning area. Based on review of the Geologic Map Database for Aggregate Resource Assessment in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area and Surrounding Regions (2016) and the Geologic Map Compilation for Aggregate Resource Assessment in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area (2015) published by AZGS, the large majority of the Town’s planning area is comprised of typical Basin-Floor Deposits (i.e. Old, fine-grained (Qif), Intermediate fine-grained (Qiyf) and Young fine-grained (Qyf) deposits). Historically, these deposits have not yielded important sources of aggregate within the Phoenix metropolitan area.
Within the Phoenix metropolitan area, predominant sources of aggregate have traditionally been deposits of the major rivers, and to a lesser degree smaller rivers and creeks, that cross the valley. A small portion of the Town’s planning area is impacted by Queen Creek. While portions of this intermediate river system located east of the CAP Canal do support large aggregate operations, the extent of Queen Creek deposits downslope from the CAP Canal (and specifically within Gilbert’s Planning Area) are poorly defined as a result of substantial agricultural activity and urban development. Based on the very limited unaltered surface deposits in the area, AZGS findings infer that gravel deposits are likely uncommon. Additionally, the lack of aggregate operations in the area is another suggested indicator of the aggregate quality, and thus resource potential, of land within the Town’s planning area.
Every reasonable effort has been made to assure the accuracy of the maps and related information contained herein. However, these maps and information reflect limited data available through the Arizona Geological Survey at the time of development of this General Plan. Further, any identification of potential aggregate resources on this map does not infer they may be developed as aggregate mining operations by right. All property must obtain the proper zoning, permits, and other required permissions necessary to operate such a facility. There is also no guarantee via this document that approval of aggregate mining facilities through the Town’s rezoning or development review process will be granted. Standard procedures for review of a change of zoning and/or any related development plans will be enforced, including consideration of compatibility of uses, impacts on neighboring properties, adequacy of infrastructure and other typical standards to support the intent of ensuring rational, orderly and coherent growth and development in the Town of Gilbert.
Exhibit 6. Aggregates Resources Map
⬚ figure
Chapter 3 • OPPORTUNITY 62
⬚ figure
The Town has been very proactive in planning for anticipated growth and redevelopment by ensuring that necessary infrastructure is in place. The Town’s water, wastewater and reclaimed water system expansions have been planned and designed with long-term sustainability in mind. As a result, much of the water supply, distribution, wastewater collection and reclaimed water systems that exist today are well suited to meet future demands or flows that may be imposed by infill and remaining system expansions as the Town approaches build-out.
As indicated in the Integrated Water Resources Master Plan Update prepared for the Town in 2018, Gilbert’s water portfolio is diverse with surface (Salt River Project, Roosevelt Water Conservation District, Colorado River Supplies), groundwater (initial groundwater allowance, annual incidental recharge volume), and reclaimed water (direct delivery for non-potable uses, underground storage and recovery) sources. Gilbert combines these varied water sources to strategically meet the needs of the Town’s unique service area. On September 29, 2010, the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) approved the most recent Modification of the Town of Gilbert’s Designation of Assured Water Supply. The resulting Decision and Order identified the portfolio of physically and legally available water supplies, including the future responsibilities of the Town to maintain its Designation of Assured Water Supply. With planned acquisitions of additional Colorado River sources and strategic initiatives with Native American Water Entitlements and Leases, the Town has worked hard to ensure a future water supply is not dependent on one single source and that there is a contingency in case of severe drought conditions. These additional supplies will reinforce the Town’s ability to manage growth needs, improve resiliency against supply variability from other sources, and support overall water supply sustainability.
The Town’s water system is currently operated as four separate pressure zones served by a robust distribution system, two surface water treatment plants (North Water Treatment Plant and San Tan Vista Water Treatment Plant) and several remote facilities that include groundwater wells, ground storage tanks, and booster
101 pages load as you reach them