Public Meetings - Hudson, Ohio

City Council held a workshop on Tuesday, October 27, 2026, at 7:30 p.m. at Town Hall, 27 East Main Street. The agenda covered Hudson’s Restaurant sidewalk and outdoor-seating improvements, a use study for the Stokes/Steidl property, updates to temporary special events and mobile food vehicle codes, the preliminary 2027-2031 Five-Year Plan, the proposed Nov. 10 consent agenda, and legislation scheduled for Nov. 10, including short-term rental regulation. No legislative votes were taken; the meeting adjourned at 10:10 p.m. Council Comments and Announcements - Council President Bird announced merchant trick-or-treat on Thursday, Oct. 29, from 5-7 p.m. in downtown Hudson, with a Hudson High School 'Thriller' flash-mob performance around 6 p.m. on First & Main Green; citywide trick-or-treat is Saturday, Oct. 31, from 6-8 p.m. - Council will be on recess the week of Nov. 3 due to the election, followed by two consecutive weeks with combined regular meetings and workshops. - Public Works leaf pickup has begun; the city processes about 18,000 cubic yards of leaves annually. - Mayor Anzevino noted early voting is underway at the Summit County Board of Elections and lines have been long, urging voters to plan ahead. Consent Calendar (Proposed for Nov. 10, 2026) - Resolution authorizing a contract with GAI Consultants Inc. for the redesign of the Barlow Road sidewalk project. Staff said the design would create a new five-foot sidewalk connecting to the existing hike-and-bike trail; resident input is expected in six to eight months. Council noted the earlier construction estimate was about $2.6 million. - Ordinance accepting $27,000 from the Pipers Key Foundation for a children’s memorial garden at Oak Grove Park. - Resolution authorizing a change order with Dunlop & Johnston for excess soils at the Public Works Facility and a reimbursement agreement with XL Specialty Insurance. Council noted the actual amount is about $1.718 million, higher than the figure in the draft legislation, and reimbursement is still being negotiated; the wording should be corrected. - Resolution amending the NorthStar Towers II option and lease agreement to increase five-year extended terms from five to nine, allowing a potential total term of 50 years for the communications tower site. Staff said financial terms are unchanged and the longer term could help fill a coverage dead zone. Discussion Items Hudson’s Restaurant Sidewalk Improvements (26-0090) - Representatives of Hudson’s Restaurant, 80 N. Main St., said they have operated there for 20 years and recently purchased the building. Their proposal includes renovating the front facade, moving the entry, and expanding outdoor seating with accordion doors to create more indoor-outdoor seating and downtown vibrancy. - The concept would move the 7-foot pedestrian walk zone, enlarge the sidewalk/patio area, and restripe or remove several on-street parking stalls. Staff noted that North Main Street generally requires a 7-foot travel zone and that further engineering design is needed for the brick accent, street trees, lights, bike racks, and regulatory signs in the area. - Council members generally liked the vibrancy goal, but raised concerns about precedent if other Main Street businesses request similar changes, parking loss, handicap access, and possible Park Lane parking. Staff said the downtown district has enough overall parking capacity; council requested a legal opinion on precedent and more parking/engineering data. - Councilor D’Eramo said she dislikes angled parking and supported the concept; Councilor Weinstein requested data on the significance of losing spaces; Councilor Brezovec suggested treating the bump-out as an expansion around the crosswalk; Mayor Anzevino noted that removing the mid-block crosswalk could recover about three spaces and should be a separate future discussion. Stokes/Steidl Property Use Study (26-0091) - The city recently acquired the 34.37-acre Stokes/Steidl parcel south of Veterans Parkway. Staff presented options including open space, a park, outdoor pool, recreation center, or other public use, and recommended holding the property as open space for now because dedicating it as parkland would require a public vote to undo. - Councilor Goetz said some Ward 1 residents prefer that the area remain green space. Staff noted the preliminary 2027 budget includes funding for a recreation center study, similar to the Clinton Crossing process, and this parcel could be an option for residents to evaluate. No action was taken. Temporary Special Events Code Update (TMP-8946) - The proposed Chapter 872 amendments are mostly administrative; the main change adds a risk-based assessment of events to align with Ohio Administrative Code and Ohio Fire Code requirements. - Councilor Goetz asked whether new insurance requirements would restrict private-property activities such as backyard bounce houses; staff will provide clarification before council consideration. Mobile Food Vehicle Code Update (TMP-8947) - The proposed Chapter 874 amendments are mostly administrative; the principal change would prohibit mobile food vehicle operations in commercial districts unless approved by the city manager. - Council questioned whether a food truck at a private birthday party would require city manager approval; staff said a request could be added to the application process, similar to the online block-party application. Approximately 39 mobile food vendors were regulated this year. Preliminary 2027-2031 Five-Year Plan (26-0092) - Staff presented assumptions, personnel costs, operating costs, and financial indicators. The plan assumes the 2% income tax rate continues; income tax collections through September 2026 are up 3.3%, but the plan conservatively assumes 2.1% annual growth from 2027 through 2031, partly because of the loss of Joann and incomplete backfill of that employer. Property taxes are projected to increase 2% in 2027. - Personnel assumptions include a 4% COLA in 2027, a 10% health insurance increase under negotiation, and 4% blended personnel cost growth from 2028 through 2031. Operating costs assume 1% growth in 2028-2031. The plan adds three full-time positions: one police dispatcher, one engineering inspector, and one golf food-and-beverage manager. - Financial indicators: debt service ratio is below the 10% cautionary range of 12-15%; the general fund ending-balance ratio is projected below the 40% target in 2029-2031, with a 30% floor; the actual Dec. 31, 2025 general fund balance was $18.5 million, or 42.71% of disbursements, higher than projected; compensated absences liability was about $5.8 million. - Councilor Brezovec said the connectivity funding decrease was not fully offset by street/stormwater increases; staff explained that roughly $8 million in prior connectivity work was debt-funded and the Public Works building added debt service. If the road program were cut in half for two years, the pavement condition index would fall from 76 in 2026 to about 72.4 in 2028, still in the 'good' category. Staff will provide a follow-up memo with details. - Staff flagged funds with declining balances: cemetery, HCTV, fire, and EMS. HCTV franchise fees are declining and the general fund subsidizes HCTV; fire and EMS have negative run rates and longer-term capital needs, including an EMS ambulance purchase in 2031. A dedicated council discussion or retreat on public safety staffing and funding was suggested. - Operating costs increase across most departments; notable increases include electric power costs and golf clubhouse activity, while fire clothing and gear costs decrease because recently hired staff were already outfitted. Proposed Legislation for Nov. 10, 2026 Short-Term Rental Ordinance (26-78) - The ordinance, postponed to Nov. 10, would amend Chapter 876. The baseline amendment adjusts fees and removes the first-time application fee exemption. Councilor Goetz’s separate amendment proposed maintaining the existing fee, requiring short-term rental owners to be Hudson residents, and capping short-term rentals by ward, with six in Ward 1 and three in other wards. A map showed roughly 15 short-term rentals in Ward 1 and four in other wards. - Councilor Goetz said residents were upset about fee increases and want fewer short-term rentals in Ward 1; she was open to letting attrition reduce the number rather than forcing current owners out. Councilor Sutton said he could not support the initial proposal because it added fee and bed-tax changes residents did not request; he favored caps based on zoning districts rather than wards. Councilor D’Eramo suggested focusing on the downtown/village area, using a simple per-zone cap, and protecting current operators’ livelihoods. Councilor Weinstein questioned the resident-ownership requirement and noted that of about 160 surveyed neighbors, roughly 40 responded and only eight had contacted the city or owner. - Mayor Anzevino recommended six per zone, no fee changes, grandfathering existing operators, allowing attrition to reduce totals, and adding a distance or separation requirement for new applications. Staff was asked to prepare a revised zoning-based framework, check pending Senate Bill 104 at the state level, and obtain solicitor input on whether a cap could be considered a ban. No Right Turn on Red During School Hours (26-134) - The ordinance would allow no-right-turn-on-red signs at the westbound intersection of E. Streetsboro Street/SR 303 and N. Hayden Parkway during school hours. It is scheduled for a second reading on Nov. 10. - A legal advisor said the westbound and school-hours restrictions appeared only in the summary and preamble and must be inserted into Section 1 to be enforceable; staff said the draft would be updated. Council discussed whether to keep it on the regular agenda or return it to the consent agenda; no final decision was announced. Other Legislative Items - 26-138: Resolution adopting in concept the 2027-2031 Five-Year Plan; scheduled for second reading. - 26-139: Ordinance making 2027 appropriations; scheduled for second reading. - 26-140: Ordinance prohibiting motor-vehicle shortcutting across public property and public school property; scheduled for second reading. - TMP-8946 and TMP-8947: Temporary special events and mobile food vehicle amendments; scheduled for first readings. - TMP-8950: Resolution approving City Manager’s appointment of Dr. James Boex to the Summit County Public Health Board of Health for a four-year term beginning Jan. 1, 2027. - TMP-8963: Proposed amendment to Section 220.03(g) to broaden public comment to city residents, landowners, and authorized representatives of businesses with a physical location in the city. Councilor Weinstein supported the change; Councilor Sutton opposed it as potentially narrowing the current 'public' comment rules and suggested instead codifying that comments must be pertinent to city business. The mayor said he has used discretion to allow non-resident stakeholders and would continue to do so; the solicitor was asked to review whether legislative change is needed. Key Outcomes - Staff will conduct further study on the Hudson’s Restaurant proposal, including parking, engineering constraints, and legal precedent; the mid-block crosswalk discussion will be scheduled separately. - The Stokes/Steidl property will remain open space for now; no parkland dedication was made. - Staff will answer questions on Chapter 872 private-property insurance requirements before council action. - Five-Year Plan comments will be incorporated into the final draft; follow-up memos are expected on PCI/connectivity, and future discussions are planned for HCTV, fire, and EMS funding. - The short-term rental ordinance will be revised around zoning-based caps, grandfathering/attrition, no fee increase, distance requirements, and legal review of pending state legislation; no ordinance was passed. - Ordinance 26-134 will be corrected so the enforceable provisions are in Section 1. - No legislative votes were taken; the workshop adjourned at 10:10 p.m.

The Hudson City Council held a regular meeting on October 20, 2026. A discrepancy exists between the source materials and the provided metadata; the agenda and transcript record a start time of 7:30 PM ET, while the source metadata indicates a timestamp of 12:30:00+00:00 (12:30 UTC). Six of seven council members were present. The meeting featured extensive public testimony primarily focused on the Canterbury Meadows development settlement and related council member conflicts of interest. Council passed a slate of major financial ordinances totaling over $56 million for capital projects and debated amendments to a traffic safety ordinance. Consent Calendar - 26-89: Acknowledged the timely receipt of the September 2026 financial report. - 26-135: Authorized the City Manager to submit an exemption application to the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) for the W. Barlow Road railroad tracks. - 26-136: Authorized the advertisement for bids and contracts for the 2027 Capital Maintenance Programs (line striping, crack sealing, resurfacing, etc.). - Items 26-134 and 26-137 were pulled by council members for individual consideration and voted on separately. Public Comments & Testimony - Melissa Jones (Resident): Opposed the Canterbury Meadows settlement, arguing it bypasses the Planning Commission, the City Charter, and the Land Development Code (LDC). She questioned the validity of the economic hardship claim, stating the burden of proof is high and that a public hearing has not been scheduled. - Caitlin Honeyball (Resident): Disputed Mayor Anzevino’s account of a previous interaction, denying she called him a liar. She requested a public apology and criticized an “ongoing pattern of overreach” by the mayor, stating she declined his offer for a private meeting. - Colette Schlemmer (Resident): Opposed the Canterbury Meadows settlement, stating official municipal data shows hundreds of acres of open green space have been developed since the year 2000. She argued the dense layout violates the rural residential conservation designation and that an outside entity should not be allowed to sidestep local laws with legal threats. - Kim Cosmos (Business Owner, Hudson Equestrian Center): Opposed the development and explicitly called for Councilmember D’Eramo to recuse herself from the matter due to her brother being a partner at Tucker Ellis, the law firm suing the city on behalf of Prestige/Canterbury Meadows. She questioned why surrounding landowners must hire private counsel to address problems caused by the city. - Cynthia Curtin (Resident): Expressed concern that the proposed number of housing units in the Clinton Crossing (Downtown Phase II) concept plan is too high, warning of significant traffic impacts on the Owen Brown and Morse Road intersection. - Todd Zedak (Resident): Heavily criticized council for revoking a previous censure, creating a “sham” of public input, and considering the usurpation of the Planning Commission’s authority. He emphasized that no citizens are speaking in favor of these actions. - Maureen Holbert (Resident): Called for Councilmember D’Eramo’s recusal, stating she attended six executive sessions on Canterbury Meadows despite the conflict of interest. She argued council is ignoring the three-step process of the charter, LDC, and Planning Commission. - Anthony Rivita (Resident): Alleged that City Manager Sheridan and Solicitor Pitchford have created an environment of intimidation and are subverting laws and codes while selectively enforcing rules against citizens. Discussion Items - Minutes Correction: Council voted 6-0 to amend the previously approved September 15, 2026, minutes, changing Councilmember Sutton’s recorded vote from “aye” to “abstain” on an executive session item. - Council Member Recusal / Conflict of Interest: Multiple public speakers called for Councilmember D’Eramo’s recusal. Councilmember Getz stated council was not previously informed that Tucker Ellis represented the developer. D’Eramo addressed the issue, stating she disclosed her brother’s employment at Tucker Ellis (in a different department) to the City Solicitor, who indicated he would review it. She stated that following the disclosure, and while the review remains ongoing, she recused herself “out of an abundance of caution.” - Traffic Signage (Item 26-134): Council debated a proposed 24/7 “No Right Turn on Red” restriction at the intersection of East Streetsboro Street (SR 303) and North Hayden Parkway. Councilmembers Sutton and D’Eramo suggested limiting the restriction to school hours for pedestrian safety, arguing a 24/7 change was excessive. Councilmember Getz advocated for the full-time restriction to ensure compliance. Council voted 5-1 to postpone the item to the November 10 meeting. - Summit Metro Parks Land Purchase (Item 26-137): Council approved a settlement agreement to buy back land from Summit Metro Parks for Maple Grove. Acting City Manager Griffith explained the city is repurchasing the land at a reduced price. It was clarified that a separate future vote is required to officially designate the land as parkland, which cannot be reversed without a public vote. - Public Works Facility Financing (Item 26-127): The revised $23,000,000 bond ordinance was passed. Councilmember Brezovec explained the increase from $21 million was due to a subcontractor error in dirt grading; the city is moving the dirt to avoid construction delays and will seek to recoup the costs. - Broadband and Infrastructure Expansion: The $15,000,000 Velocity Broadband expansion and $3,000,000 Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) water/electric projects were fully approved as part of the finance package. - Planning Commission Oversight: Councilmember Weinstein discussed attendance issues and a lack of training among Planning Commission members. She stressed the importance of following the Land Development Code to avoid legal risks and noted efforts to improve professionalism on the board. - Public Comment Rules: Councilmember Weinstein raised the idea of amending council rules to allow Hudson business owners who are not necessarily residents to address council during the public comment period. - Proclamations: Mayor Anzevino proclaimed October 20, 2026, as “Red Kettle Day” in recognition of the Salvation Army’s contributions and services in Hudson. Salvation Army leadership accepted the proclamation and thanked the community for its support. - Acting City Manager’s Report: Brian Griffith announced the schedule for residential leaf pickup (starting Oct 26), Halloween events (merchant trick-or-treat Oct 29, citywide trick-or-treat Oct 31), and pumpkin composting. Key Outcomes - Minutes: The minutes of the October 6 and October 13 council meetings were approved (5-0-1, D’Eramo abstained). The September 15 minutes were amended (6-0). - Consent Agenda: Approved minus pulled items (6-0). - Item 26-134: Postponed to November 10, 2026 (5-1; D’Eramo voted against postponement). - Item 26-137: Authorized the lease termination and land buyback from Summit Metro Parks (6-0). - Finance Package (26-124 to 26-130): Seven ordinances authorizing bonds and notes for land acquisition, a new public works facility, a bus garage, a salt storage facility, a fire station renovation, broadband expansion, and utility metering were passed unanimously (6-0). - First Readings: Introduced for the Five-Year Plan 2027-2031 (26-138), the 2027 Budget Appropriations (26-139), and a prohibition on motor vehicle shortcutting across public and school property (26-140).

The Hudson Planning Commission convened on a full agenda October 19, 2026, taking final action on a major site plan, receiving a comprehensive introduction to the city's Clinton Crossing concept, and engaging in extensive debate regarding its procedural independence and relationship with City Council. Public Comments - Tom Mayer (7153 Valley View Road) addressed the commission regarding the Clinton Crossing concept plan. He urged the commission to enforce the Land Development Code and Comprehensive Plan, arguing the proposed residential density (41 townhomes and 33 single-family homes on 5.1 acres) far exceeds District 5 allowances. He calculated the plan would legally support only 52 units, not the 74 proposed. Old Business - Standard Shop Company (PC 2026-1129) Major Site Plan Approval: This public hearing was continued from September. Staff (Nick Sugar) provided a detailed history of design changes from the 2022 approval. The Industrial Design Subcommittee (IDS) recommended approval. The applicant updated the commission on landscaping and noted a siding material change to Diamond Coat. Commissioner Innamorato discussed phasing and performance bonds. - Vote: Motion to approve with conditions (tree protection fencing, performance bond review by city engineer, and IDS recommendations). Vote: 7-0 (Unanimous). - EAC Communications: Chair Norman reported on coordination with the Environmental Awareness Committee (EAC) regarding updates to LDC Appendices B and C. Action is deferred pending a formal recommendation from the EAC. New Business - Clinton Crossing Concept Site Plan Introduction: City staff (Brian Griffiths, Emily McKinley, Nick Sugar) presented an extensive overview of the city-led development plan for a 21-acre site. The current concept includes 33 single-family homes, 41 townhomes, a 70-room hotel, a 15,000 sq ft market hall with co-working, a 7,000 sq ft community flex space, and a public plaza. Staff detailed a year-long public engagement process involving over 125 charrette participants, multiple surveys, and open houses. Market feasibility studies for the hotel and market hall were cited as positive. - Commission Positions & Concerns: - Ms. McCoy expressed strong reservations about traffic congestion on Owen Brown and Morse Road, inadequate parking, potential impacts on existing downtown businesses, and the compatibility of placing a playground so close to a hotel. She requested stacking studies for the traffic analysis. - Mr. Innamorato questioned whether public input participants were given LDC density guidelines; they were not. - Mr. Romano confirmed the traffic study will cover 30+ intersections and include approved projects like Fairmount. He sought clarity on soil remediation costs for bearing capacity issues. - Ms. Smith critiqued the site plan for appearing disconnected between residential and non-residential areas with insufficient green space. She raised safety concerns about a playground near a hotel and suggested relocating single-family homes away from the market hall. - Ms. Obert praised the new community-driven approach. She raised critical issues including the timeline for a sanitary sewer MOU with Summit County, soil bearing capacity and wetland impacts on homeowner insurance, and the modeled square footage for the hotel potentially being too small for 70 rooms. - Mr. Nystrom cited traffic and density as his biggest concerns. He asked for visual examples of proposed lot sizes. Staff projected townhomes at $700,000 and single-family homes at $900,000. - Chair Norman applauded the process but delivered stern warnings against over-densification. She demanded a citywide traffic study (requested for two years but delayed), firm infrastructure capacity data (sewer, water), and action on the deficient Planned Development (PD) standards from the city council, stating she cannot defend the project under the current PD code. - Next Steps: Formal concept site plan review is anticipated for the November 9, 2026 meeting. The commission expects a completed traffic study and utility data by then. Administrative Rules & Council Liaison Discussion - Item A: Chair Norman delivered a detailed defense of the commission in response to critical correspondence from Council Liaison Amanda Weinstein. The liaison's email questioned the commission's lines of questioning (costs, construction methods, borings) and asserted the body should act as a unified front with less complexity. Chair Norman and commissioners Obert, Nystrom, Innamorato, McCoy, and Romano universally expressed offense at the email, calling it a political threat, insulting, and misinformed. Commissioner Smith disagreed, stating such discussions were outside the PC's role and jurisdiction, causing her significant discomfort. Prestige Settlement Discussion - Item B: Chair Norman provided a timeline of events since the PC's September meeting, noting the city denied the PC's request for independent legal counsel on the litigation. Commissioner Smith reiterated her position that the topic was outside the PC's purview. - Motion: To authorize the Chair to speak on behalf of the Planning Commission regarding the Prestige settlement. Vote: 5-1 (Norman, McCoy, Nystrom, Romano, Innamorato in favor; Smith opposed. Obert recused per legal advice). Other Business - Repeal of Chapter 1210 (Item C): Chair Norman initiated discussion on repealing the rarely used Beneficial Use Determination ordinance. Commissioners requested more information before taking any action. - Attendance Policy (Item D): Commissioner Romano questioned whether the timing of a staff email flagging his attendance was politically motivated following his criticism of council. Staff (Nick Sugar) stated it was his own self-initiated administrative review. Chair Norman intervened, stating the staff's process was a violation of protocol and introduced a motion to excuse all PC member absences for calendar year 2026. Vote: 5-0-1 (Smith had departed; Romano abstained). Key Outcomes - Standard Shop Company: Approved unanimously (7-0) with conditions. - Clinton Crossing: Formal hearing scheduled for November 9, 2026. Chair Norman demanded a citywide traffic study, complete infrastructure data, and workable PD standards for a successful review. - Prestige: Chair authorized to act as spokesperson (5-1). - Attendance: Slate cleared for calendar year 2026 (5-0-1). - Staff Update: Upcoming agenda items include a city salt dome project and a coordinated response on data center LDC amendments.

The City Council workshop convened at 7:30 PM at Town Hall with six members present (Dr. Weinstein absent). The meeting covered administrative land development code amendments, an update on the Clinton Crossing redevelopment project including financial models and public financing tools, and a review of the 2027-2031 five-year capital plan. Proposed consent agenda items and legislation were discussed for the upcoming October 20 meeting. Discussion Items - Land Development Code Admin Amendments (26-0084): Community Development Director Greg Hannan presented proposed administrative changes to address code confusion and outdated references. Key proposals include: clarifying that the public open space dedication exemption for residential projects is based on dwelling units rather than lots; removing the requirement for a surveyed site plan at initial submittal for basic residential projects (still needed before certificate of occupancy); and updating architectural design standards for accessory buildings and materials. Council members debated the burden of surveys on homeowners versus engineering benefits. The City Manager supported keeping the survey requirement for safety. Staff will prepare draft amendments for first reading and referral to Planning Commission. - Clinton Crossing – Site Studies and Financial Models (26-0085): Emily McKinley and Greg Hannan provided a project update, and Max Upton (Bricker Graydon Wyatt) presented financial analyses. The project now targets 74 units (33 single-family, 41 townhomes). Site studies show minimal wetland impact (<0.5 acres, Category 1), a clean environmental site, suitable soils with minor construction concerns, adequate downtown parking with no need for paid parking, and a traffic impact study underway covering over 30 intersections. Hotel and market hall feasibility studies indicate strong market potential. Financial analysis: Existing TIF (residential) projects annual revenue of $743,000 and net proceeds of $14.49 million over 30 years; new TIF (commercial) annual revenue of $73,000 and net $2.155 million; total net TIF proceeds of $17.637 million ($11 million net present value). Public finance tools reviewed include Special Improvement District, Downtown Redevelopment District (ruled out), and New Community Authority (NCA) – staff was directed to study NCA further. Council expressed interest in engaging property owners and further analysis. - Capital Plan Review – 2027-2031 Five-Year Plan (26-0086): Jeff Knoblauch and Margaret Tussey presented the capital plan. Highlights: $3.7 million annual street program; $15.1 million in stormwater projects over five years (pay-as-you-go in 2027, debt-financed from 2028); $2.4 million in connectivity/sidewalk projects in the general fund (with many trails unfunded); debt service for new public works facility, fire/EMS renovation, AMI, and fiber-to-the-home. Council member Sutton raised concerns about the drastic reduction in connectivity funding compared to prior years and the imbalance toward stormwater. Staff was asked to prepare an analysis showing the impact of adding one or two sidewalk projects per year on fund balances over the five-year period. The plan currently projects a 44% carryover in 2027, dropping to 42% in 2028, and adding sidewalks could reduce it to 18% by 2031. Staff will bring the analysis to the next meeting. Proposed Consent Agenda (Forwarded to October 20, 2026 Council Meeting) - Motion to acknowledge receipt of September 2026 financial report. - Ordinance permitting "No Right Turn on Red" signs at E. Streetsboro Street (SR 303) and N. Hayden Parkway. - Resolution authorizing PUCO exemption application for W. Barlow Road railroad tracks. - Resolution authorizing advertisement for bids for 2027 capital maintenance programs. - Resolution authorizing lease termination agreement with Summit Metro Parks for Maple Grove. Proposed Legislation (Forwarded for Further Consideration; Third Readings for 26-124 through 26-130 on October 20) - 26-124: $740,000 bond anticipation notes for 4.0 acres near Owen Brown/Morse (refinancing). - 26-125: $925,000 bond anticipation notes for 1.0 acre at 94 Owen Brown. - 26-126: Not to exceed $6,825,000 notes for new salt storage and bus maintenance facility at 5810 Hudson Drive. - 26-127: $23,000,000 bonds for new Public Works facility (amended from $21M due to soils issue). - 26-128: Not to exceed $15,000,000 notes for Velocity Broadband residential expansion. - 26-129: Not to exceed $5,000,000 notes for Fire/EMS facility renovation and detached garage. - 26-130: Not to exceed $3,000,000 notes for Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI). - 26-138: Resolution adopting in concept the 2027-2031 Five-Year Plan (first reading). - 26-139: Ordinance appropriating expenses for fiscal year 2027 (first reading). - 26-140: Ordinance amending shortcutting prohibition to include public and school property (first reading). Key Outcomes - All consent agenda and legislation items were forwarded to the October 20 Council meeting for approval. - Staff will draft LDC amendments and bring back for first reading and referral to Planning Commission. - Staff will further study the New Community Authority (NCA) as a financing tool for Clinton Crossing and the broader downtown. - Staff will provide a detailed analysis of connectivity project funding impacts on the five-year capital plan and fund balances.

On Tuesday, October 6, 2026, Hudson City Council met at Town Hall, 27 East Main Street. Five of seven members were present: Michael W. Bird, Kyle Brezovec, Patricia L. Goetz, Amanda Weinstein, and Dan White. Samantha D'Eramo and Skylar J. Sutton were absent. The agenda listed a 6:30 p.m. executive session to interview boards and commissions applicants; the minutes record that the meeting was called to order at 6:45 p.m., the executive session began at 6:45 p.m., and the regular meeting resumed at 7:30 p.m. Council approved the consent agenda, adopted an amended low-speed vehicle ordinance, postponed the Canterbury Meadows settlement resolution to November 17, and held second readings on seven financing ordinances. No appointments were made. Proclamation - Mayor Jeffrey L. Anzevino proclaimed October 22, 2026, as 'Take a Second. Make a Difference' Day in Hudson and presented the proclamation to representatives of Hudson Community First. The representatives said this year's initiative received almost 100 nominations and would honor 11 winners. Consent Calendar - Minutes of the September 15, 2026 City Council meeting and the September 22, 2026 Council workshop were approved 5-0. - Council suspended the three-reading rule and approved the consent agenda 5-0, including: - Resolution 26-131: authorizing bidding and contracts for salt barn pad construction and relocation of the existing salt storage foundation. - Resolution 26-132: authorizing bidding and award of multi-year printing and mailing services for the resident newsletter 'Focus on Hudson.' - Resolution 26-133: authorizing bidding and contract award for construction of the second phase of the Velocity Broadband Fiber-to-the-Home project, after cancellation of previous contracts due to updated construction specifications intended to enhance safety; declared an emergency. Public Comments & Testimony - Caitlin Honniball (2763 Middleton Road) expressed concerns about leadership, professional courtesy, and the standard of conduct of elected officials, saying she felt targeted by a personal verbal attack after a prior meeting. Mayor Anzevino later responded that several points were not accurate and repeated an offer to share a 20-plus page call/action log. - Kathy Russell, with Lois James, presented petitions containing approximately 425 signatures on behalf of the Hudson Beautification Initiative supporting expansion of the Adopt-a-Spot program, and asked Council to provide resources such as funding, city manpower, or contracted landscape services. Lois James quoted petition comments praising the downtown improvements and urging continued funding/maintenance. - Lee Cosma, owner of the Hudson Equestrian Center, yielded her time to a geologist who raised technical concerns about Canterbury Meadows, including low-lying wetlands, near-surface water tables, retention ponds with no storage capacity, drainage toward adjacent property, and approximately 30 feet of impermeable dense clay. - Greg Hall (2545 Ravenna St.) opposed Resolution 26-118, stating Council lacked site-specific hydrologic analysis, financial risk analysis, ecological/wildlife impact assessment, technical approval of the plan, and historical community impact information; he said there was no responsible 'yes' vote. - Tom Mayor (7153 Valley View Dr.) argued the Land Development Code's open space conservation provisions were intended to maximize wetland protection and open space and to cluster homes tightly, and he asked Council to renegotiate the settlement toward smaller, half-acre-or-less lots. - Kent Cleveland (71 Keswick Dr.) supported allowing low-speed vehicles to travel short distances on 35 mph roads, questioned requiring lights while prohibiting night operation, and disagreed with comparing low-speed vehicles to Amish buggies. - Christine Thaxton (Thaxton Family Farms, Ravenna St.) opposed settlement approval, stating that geotechnical and stormwater studies would not be done until after approval, the last geotechnical study was unfavorable, legal documents contain loopholes, and the city's hardship insurance does not cover the hardship claim. - Kim Cosma Segedy and Maureen Hulbert (2200 Ravenna St.) raised concerns about the Prestige settlement, including why the City would settle after favorable rulings, treating both sides of Ravenna Street as one development, drainage and wetland/green space issues, possible changes without public oversight, and the precedent it would set. - Bill Klausman (2746 Blue Heron Dr.) read an anonymous resident's letter questioning Council's willingness to settle and contrasting it with Hudson's history of defending its boards and commissions. - Nova Buchanan (6312 Stow Rd.) opposed the development, saying her sump pump runs constantly because of the high water table and warning that settlement would set a precedent for developers to litigate around city standards. - Anthony Ravida (1746 Edgar Dr.) alleged wrongdoing by City staff and City Manager Thomas Sheridan, including malicious prosecution and record-related violations; he said he had documentation to support his claims. - No public speaker spoke in favor of the Canterbury Meadows settlement. Discussion Items - Low-Speed Vehicle Ordinance (26-113): Council considered Ordinance 26-113, amending Chapter 478 and declaring an emergency. After substituting the 'Bird Amendment 10-1-26' language, Council approved Dr. Weinstein's amendment 4-1 (Goetz opposed), allowing low-speed vehicles to cross intersections on higher-speed roads and to travel on streets with speed limits greater than 25 mph but not greater than 35 mph for a continuous distance not exceeding one-quarter mile to reach the nearest permitted street. Council then approved Dr. Bird's tire amendment 5-0, requiring tires identified by the manufacturer as suitable for pavement, hard-surface, street, on-road, or mixed on-road/off-road operation, and prohibiting tires intended exclusively or primarily for mud, sand, agricultural, racing, or other specialized off-road use. Dr. Goetz said she did not support low-speed vehicles on roads because Hudson is 'not a rural city' nor a 'retirement city.' Dr. Bird said rejecting the ordinance would revert to less-restrictive state law. Mr. Brezovec supported the amendments but moved to postpone to October 20 so absent member Sutton could weigh in; the postponement failed 1-4. Council then passed Ordinance 26-113, as substituted and twice amended, 5-0, with emergency language. - Canterbury Meadows Settlement (26-118): Resolution 26-118 would authorize settlement of Prestige Builder Group, LLC v. City of Hudson and related claims involving approximately 94.56 acres on Ravenna Street and Stow Road, establishing a 32-lot single-family Open Space Conservation Subdivision and resolving pending litigation plus a multi-million-dollar administrative hardship claim. In discussion, Mr. Brezovec said the hardship claim was a substantial risk; Dr. Weinstein said she wanted more time to review Land Development Code inconsistencies, especially in Rural Residential, while noting code changes would not apply retroactively; Mr. White supported postponing to answer resident questions; and Dr. Goetz said the City must apply the current code and amend it if needed. A motion to postpone Resolution 26-118 to a date certain of Tuesday, November 17, 2026, passed 5-0. - Financing Ordinances - Second Readings: Council held second readings on seven ordinances: - 26-124: $740,000 in taxable economic development non-tax revenue bond anticipation notes for acquiring approximately 4.0 acres near Owen Brown Street and Morse Road. - 26-125: $925,000 in taxable economic development non-tax revenue BANs for acquiring approximately 1.0 acre at 94 Owen Brown Street. - 26-126: not to exceed $6,825,000 in notes for a new salt storage facility and bus maintenance/storage facility at 5810 Hudson Drive. - 26-127: $21,000,000 in bonds for constructing/furnishing/equipping a new Public Works facility. - 26-128: not to exceed $15,000,000 in notes for expanding Velocity Broadband fiber-optic residential internet service. - 26-129: not to exceed $5,000,000 in notes for remodeling/renovating the Fire/EMS facility and constructing a detached garage. - 26-130: not to exceed $3,000,000 in notes for an Advanced Metering Infrastructure project for water and electric utilities. No final votes were taken on these ordinances. - City Manager's Report: Thomas Sheridan reported that the Prospect Street Turnpike bridge is scheduled to reopen October 23, 2026, with all final work completed by the end of October; the State Route 91 bridge is expected to fully reopen in late November. He said he would provide an update on the Stow Road/I-480 bridge project. Correspondence and Council Comments - Dr. Goetz said the Hudson Rotary Club paid $900 to adopt a spot, attended State of Mind Hudson mental health first aid training, and suggested a joint workshop between the Planning Commission and the Architectural & Historic Board of Review. - Dr. Weinstein thanked residents for feedback and said she had worked with residents and Summit County officials on improving processes around county sewer lines. - Dr. Bird noted early voting had begun, mentioned the city's natural gas aggregation opt-out ballot measure, and asked the City Manager and Solicitor to explore an independent regional expert review of City processes to reduce litigation risk. - Mr. White gave updates on the Environmental Awareness Committee, thanked the League of Women Voters, and noted upcoming farmer's market and Friends of Hudson Parks events. - Mayor Anzevino read a Hudson Heritage Association letter supporting Adopt-a-Spot funding and made community announcements. Key Outcomes - Minutes approved 5-0. - Consent agenda approved 5-0. - Ordinance 26-113 passed 5-0 as amended; emergency declared. - Resolution 26-118 postponed to November 17, 2026, by a 5-0 vote. - Seven financing ordinances advanced to third reading after second readings. - Council voted 5-0 to enter executive session to discuss imminent litigation and confidential matters at 9:53 p.m.; the regular meeting resumed and adjourned at 11:01 p.m.

The Hudson City Council held a workshop meeting on Tuesday, September 22, 2026, at 7:30 PM at Town Hall, 27 East Main Street. Mayor Jeffrey L. Anzevino called the meeting to order and turned it over to President of Council Michael W. Bird. All seven council members were present, along with City Manager Thomas J. Sheridan, Assistant City Managers, City Engineer Brad Kosco, Chief of Police Tabak, and other staff. The meeting was adjourned at 8:45 PM. Correspondence and Council Comments - Councilmember D'Eramo provided an update on the September 16, 2026 BZBA meeting and noted she contacted a resident affected by a sewer backup due to a Summit County sewer line break. - Councilmember Brezovec reported on the September 21 Park Board meeting, including discussion on pickleball courts and kayak rentals at Hudson Springs Park (expected to be subsidized). He also updated on the Fiber to the Home project: construction resumed on Winterbury and Hudson Park Estates, rebidding for other areas, with construction expected to start spring 2027. He announced a verbal agreement with Summit County regarding Maple Grove Park, to be presented to Council soon. - Councilmember Goetz announced an O'Brien Cemetery tour on September 26 from 4-6 p.m. - Mayor Anzevino acknowledged various community events and read a letter from resident Tom Mayer regarding the Prestige Settlement Agreement. Public Comments & Testimony - Tom Mayer (7153 Valley View Road) submitted a letter read by the Mayor, opposing the proposed settlement for the Canterbury Meadows development (Prestige Builder Group litigation). He argued that the settlement violates the Land Development Code (LDC) requirements for rural residential zoning and open space conservation, the current and past comprehensive plans, and the City Charter. He criticized the Planning Next report presented at the September 15 public hearing as incomplete and unprofessional, and stated that Council members failed to question the report's deficiencies. He urged Council to reject the settlement. Discussion Items 1. Truck Traffic along SR 91 and SR 303 (Item 26-0080) City Engineer Kosco explained that ODOT confirmed the city cannot restrict truck traffic by vehicle type under Ohio Revised Code, only by weight. Implementing a weight restriction would require an engineering analysis, an alternative route study, and would pose enforcement challenges (no scales, difficulty distinguishing local vs. through trucks). Staff does not recommend pursuing a weight restriction. Mayor Anzevino and Sheridan noted that widening turn radii at the SR 91/303 intersection was previously considered but rejected due to the desire to preserve green space. Council discussed the issue and no action was taken; staff will not pursue changes at this time. 2. W. Barlow Road Railroad Exemption (Item 26-0081) Kosco explained the desire to obtain an exemption for the railroad crossing on W. Barlow Road so that school buses no longer need to stop, as the rail line is inactive and parts have been purchased by the city for a trail. The process involves Council legislation and submission to the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO). Council agreed to move forward with the exemption; legislation will be drafted for the next workshop agenda. This is considered a temporary solution until the rails-to-trails project removes the crossing entirely. 3. Focus on Hudson Newsletter – Printing Services (Item 26-132 / TMP-8883) Assistant City Manager Knoblauch presented a request to authorize bidding for a multi-year printing and mailing contract. The newsletter is currently published six times a year, costing about $5,000 per issue (including printing and postage). A 2024 communications survey showed favorable feedback. Council discussed potential changes: increasing frequency (to 12 or 6 issues per year), renaming the newsletter, and staff capacity. City Manager Sheridan will prepare a memo for the October 6 Council meeting addressing these questions. The resolution was also forwarded as part of the consent agenda. Proposed Consent Agenda (Forwarded to October 6, 2026 Council Meeting) All three resolutions were forwarded for further consideration: - Resolution 26-131 (Salt Barn Pad Construction and Relocation): Authorizes construction of a new asphalt pad and relocation of the salt storage foundation. The location at the northwest corner of the former youth development center property was chosen after analysis of wetland setbacks. The project aims to bid this year, with salt delivery expected for winter 2027-28. - Resolution 26-132 (Focus on Hudson Printing Services): Same as discussion item; forwarded. - Resolution 26-133 (Fiber to the Home Phase 2 Construction): Authorizes bidding for the second phase, combining previously bid and new areas. Construction was halted for three months due to safety concerns; rebidding is planned for early October with construction to begin spring 2027. Note: The agenda originally assigned these items TMP numbers (e.g., TMP-8892, TMP-8883, TMP-8903), but the minutes reflect the resolution numbers 26-131, 26-132, and 26-133. The minute numbers are used here. Proposed Legislation for October 6, 2026 Council Meeting A. Ordinance 26-113 – Low Speed Vehicle Amendments (Chapter 478) Council discussed multiple proposed amendments. President Bird presented his amendment, which prohibits children requiring car seats from riding in low-speed vehicles, restricts vehicles traveling below posted speed limits, and includes a requirement for DOT-approved tires. Councilmember Sutton noted that no DOT-approved tires exist for these vehicles, effectively banning them all. Chief Tabak stated his department could enforce Bird’s amendment. Councilmember Brezovec supported Sutton’s alternative (with stickers instead of on-board documentation), and Councilmember Weinstein also favored the sticker approach. A majority of Council expressed support for Bird’s amendments but requested clarification on the DOT tire requirement. The ordinance was forwarded for third reading on October 6. B. Resolution 26-118 – Prestige Builder Group Settlement (Canterbury Meadows) Councilmember Weinstein requested additional time for residents to meet with Council and staff to address concerns about the settlement. Discussion ensued on the procedural timeline: if postponed, a new public hearing would be required within 21 days of a third reading. City Manager Sheridan will meet with the City Solicitor to determine options for postponement, including potential dates (October 20, November 10, or December) and will report back to Council. Councilmember Brezovec reserved judgment until the third reading. The resolution was forwarded for further consideration, but a postponement is likely pending legal advice. C – I: Bond and Note Ordinances (Items 26-124 through 26-130) All were forwarded for second readings on October 6: - 26-124: $740,000 bond anticipation notes for refinancing of 4.0 acres at Owen Brown Street and Morse Road (Windstream property). - 26-125: $925,000 bond anticipation notes for financing of 1.0 acre at 94 Owen Brown Street. - 26-126: Up to $6,825,000 notes for new salt storage and bus maintenance facility at 5810 Hudson Drive. - 26-127: Up to $21,000,000 bonds for new Public Works facility. - 26-128: Up to $15,000,000 notes for expansion of Velocity Broadband fiber optic system. - 26-129: Up to $5,000,000 notes for remodeling/enlarging Fire/EMS facility including new detached garage. - 26-130: Up to $3,000,000 notes for Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) for water and electric utilities. Key Outcomes - Truck traffic: No action; staff does not recommend weight restriction. - Barlow Road railroad exemption: Council agreed to move forward; legislation to be prepared. - Focus on Hudson Newsletter: Discussion will continue; memo requested. - Consent Agenda resolutions (26-131, 26-132, 26-133): Forwarded to October 6 Council meeting. - Ordinance 26-113: Forwarded for third reading; majority backs Bird amendment pending DOT tire clarification. - Resolution 26-118: Forwarded but likely postponed; City Manager to consult solicitor on timeline and public hearing requirements. - Bond/note ordinances (26-124 through 26-130): Forwarded for second readings. - Future agenda: Proclamation for "Take a Second Make a Difference" to be included on October 6 agenda. Councilmember White asked about Barlow Road sidewalk design; City Manager said fee proposals are being requested and will come to a future workshop.

The Hudson City Council met on Tuesday, September 15, 2026, at 7:30 PM in Town Hall. The meeting featured a public hearing on a proposed settlement agreement for the Canterbury Meadows development, along with proclamations, consent agenda approvals, and first readings of multiple bond ordinances. The meeting adjourned at 12:07 AM following an executive session. Proclamations - The council recognized the Mighty Vincent Project (2026), which has mobilized 2,635 volunteers providing 6,017 hours of service to 31 nonprofits and raised over $108,000. The week of September 9–27, 2026 was proclaimed. - Jacob Meacham was recognized for calmly assisting a friend during an emergency, enabling rapid response. - The Hudson Kiwanis Club’s 75th anniversary was celebrated; September 24, 2026 was proclaimed Kiwanis Club Day. - Constitution Week (September 17–23, 2026) was proclaimed, accepted by a Daughters of the American Revolution representative. Consent Calendar - 26-0079 – Motion to acknowledge the August 2026 monthly financial report. - 26-120 – Resolution authorizing pre-purchase of retaining wall blocks for Ellsworth Meadows Golf Course Hole 17 Phase 2 (emergency). - 26-121 – Resolution authorizing the Ellsworth Meadows Golf Course storm water management project. - 26-122 – Resolution authorizing the N. Main Street storm water improvement project (emergency). - 26-123 – Resolution forwarding the Clinton Crossing preferred site plan to Planning Commission for concept site plan review. All consent items were approved unanimously (7-0) after suspending the three-reading rule. Public Comments & Testimony Public Hearing on Resolution 26-118 (Canterbury Meadows Settlement) The hearing opened at 7:54 PM and closed at 10:15 PM. Testimony included: - City’s outside counsel Michael Cicero explained that a constitutional hardship claim by the developer triggered involvement of NORMA (insurance pool). He stated the city hired Planning Next for independent zoning analysis. - Planning Next consultants (Sarah Kelly, Delaney Sillman) testified that the proposed 32-lot open space conservation subdivision complies with the Land Development Code (LDC), fits within common definitions of conservation subdivisions, and compels better design than conventional development. - Property owners within 300 feet: - Council Member Skylar Sutton (speaking as a resident, recused from dais) argued the settlement violates state and local law, bypasses Planning Commission authority, sets a “pay-to-play” precedent, and that the hardship claim process was not followed. He stated he is prepared to seek court relief. - Melissa Jones (adjacent property owner, accompanied by attorney Mark Stockman) objected that she had not received requested public records (hardship claim documents) and could not fully testify. She questioned the legality of the settlement and the city’s authority to override the Planning Commission. - Kim Cosma Segedy expressed concern about stormwater runoff onto her property from the development. - Nova Buchanan raised concerns about privacy, contiguous open space, and traffic (32 homes adding at least 60 commuters, school buses, etc.) at the dangerous Ravenna-Stow Road intersection. - Other municipal residents: - Jennifer Justi Keleman requested a traffic study, citing dangerous intersection. - Mary Miller (Fox Trace Lane) worried about stormwater impacts and settlement bypassing Planning Commission. - Susan Newman (Hudson Heritage Association) argued the settlement contradicts the city charter by undermining Planning Commission and ignoring the current Comprehensive Plan (2024). - Christine Thaxton (Thaxton Family Farm) raised environmental concerns: stormwater management, soil stability, well contamination, and noted campaign contributions to three council members from developer-associated entities. - Phil Leiter stated the settlement sets a dangerous precedent allowing developers to bypass boards by threatening lawsuits. - Greg Hall requested independent scrutiny of land valuation, asked for litigation costs, and noted that three council members received campaign donations. - Leonore Cosma (Hudson Equestrian Center) asked about floodwater from Brandywine Creek headwaters and traffic. - Todd Zedak emphasized that residents have no financial interest, only community protection. - Sarah Norman pointed out missing details in the plan and the lack of a proper hardship process under Chapter 1210 (dating to 1958). - Anthony Ravida alleged that City Manager Sheridan ‘moves the rules’ and that information is withheld. - Developer’s attorney John Slagter stated that the developer worked in good faith, that the Planning Commission’s decision was inconsistent, and that the code has internal inconsistencies. He maintained that council has authority to settle and that the developer’s constitutional rights are at stake. He offered to provide a written list of inconsistencies. - Council questions: Council members Brezovec, D’Eramo, Bird, and Weinstein asked clarifying questions. Brezovec expressed appreciation for hearing legal arguments. Bird stated that campaign contributions do not create a conflict of interest under Ohio ethics law. Weinstein echoed that donations do not affect her vote. General Public Comments (after hearing) - Caitlin Honniball reported raw sewage backup in her home for three weeks and criticized city communication. Mayor Anzevino responded that the city contacted Summit County (which owns the sanitary sewer) and that a collapsed pipe was found and is being replaced. - Melissa Jones clarified her recusal from Planning Commission discussions on Canterbury Meadows following Ohio Ethics Commission advice. - Todd Zedak thanked Council Member Sutton for articulating the law and urged council to follow rules. - Anthony Ravida alleged wrongdoing by city staff. Discussion Items - Council Comments: - Dr. Goetz praised EMS response at a local Acme incident and noted a conflict between Planning Commission and Architectural Review Board over a townhome plan. - Brezovec reported on fire station renovations (including new women’s locker room) and Velocity Broadband timeline updates. - Weinstein mentioned Graze on the Green, the Hired in Hudson job fair (Sept 16), and Planning Commission actions (approval of townhomes, daycare, discussion of moratorium on planned developments). - Bird noted the 9/11 commemoration and the Trike and Bike fundraiser that raised $30,000 for pediatric cancer research. - City Manager Report: Sheridan announced the senior snow plow program (150 spots, Sept 14-Oct 14), splash pad closing at end of September, and a planned map for Velocity Broadband installation schedules. - Appointments: None made; deadline extended to Sept 25 for multiple boards. Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda Approved (7-0): Financial report, Ellsworth Meadows projects, N. Main Street storm sewer, and Clinton Crossing concept plan referral. - Ordinance 26-78 (Short-Term Rentals) postponed to November 10, 2026 (vote 5-2; Sutton and Brezovec opposed). - Resolution 26-118 (Canterbury Meadows Settlement) received its second reading; third reading scheduled for October 6, 2026. No action taken. - Bond ordinances (26-124 through 26-130) all had first readings for financing various capital projects: - 26-124: $740,000 for property at Owen Brown & Morse (Windstream land) – first reading. - 26-125: $925,000 for 94 Owen Brown Street – first reading. - 26-126: Up to $6,825,000 for salt storage and bus maintenance at 5810 Hudson Drive – first reading. - 26-127: Up to $21,000,000 for new Public Works facility – first reading. - 26-128: Up to $15,000,000 for Velocity Broadband expansion – first reading. - 26-129: Up to $5,000,000 for Fire/EMS facility renovation – first reading. - 26-130: Up to $3,000,000 for Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) – first reading. - Executive Session entered at 11:11 PM (vote 6-1, Sutton abstained) to discuss pending litigation and property matters; meeting resumed at 12:07 AM and adjourned.

On Monday, September 14, 2026, the Hudson, Ohio Planning Commission met at Town Hall, 27 East Main Street. The Industrial Design Subcommittee met at 7:00 p.m., and the regular Planning Commission meeting was called to order at 7:32 p.m. Present were Chair Sarah Norman, Matt Romano, David Nystrom, Fred Innamorato, Angela Smith, and Chelsea McCoy; Jessie Obert was absent. The commission discussed the Prestige Settlement Agreement, continued site-plan reviews for an 18-unit townhome development and a daycare, considered the previously approved Standard Shop Company industrial business park, and forwarded Planned Development recommendations to City Council. The meeting adjourned at 11:06 p.m. Industrial Design Subcommittee - The subcommittee reviewed PC 2026-1129, the Standard Shop Company industrial business park, before the regular meeting. Staff noted the project was approved in late 2022 and that its approvals expire in October 2026. - Architect Mark Leszynski said new buildings would use Hardie Board and brick matching the existing building, with a slightly darker center section. Joe Crowder of CGI Construction said the large rear wall results from interior unit design, and a false window could be considered; windows on the Terex Road side could be moved inward about five to six feet. - Charles Wolf, a new owner, said site work would begin within a week. Subcommittee members expressed frustration with delays and asked for proof of financing, a secured bond, confirmed materials, window adjustments, and updated landscaping. - Motion to continue the application to the October 12, 2026 Industrial Design Subcommittee meeting passed 2–0, with Fred Innamorato and Ms. Marzulla of the Architectural and Historical Board of Review voting yes. Public Comments & Testimony - Melissa Jones, 2233 Ravenna Street, thanked the commission for scheduling the Prestige Settlement Agreement discussion. She argued the settlement would remove Planning Commission approval authority, bypass the Land Development Code, and eliminate public hearing rights, and urged commissioners to follow their oaths. - David Petersilge, 58 Prescott Drive, said approval of the Stow and Ravenna Street development is a Planning Commission matter, not a City Council matter. He objected to the September 1 Council agenda describing the project as “now compliant” when the Planning Commission had not made that finding. - No public comments were offered during the townhome public hearing. Discussion Items Prestige Settlement Agreement (Discussion Item VIII) - Chair Norman reviewed the response resolution included in the agenda. It requested independent legal counsel for the Planning Commission; disqualification of certain staff and Council members; postponement of the September 15, 2026 Council hearing; rejection of the settlement; pursuit of court remedies; and a resolution of no confidence in the current City Council. - Commissioner Romano cited traffic and downstream water concerns, said he had received no Council communication, and stated the proposed settlement does not meet development standards. He said appeal risk appeared low and the settlement would set a troubling precedent. - Commissioner Nystrom raised concerns about Council encroachment, campaign contributions from the applicant to Council members, and lack of disclosure. He said Planning Commission members have not engaged in politics or favoritism. - Commissioner Smith read a prepared statement saying the Commission should not be involved in litigation strategy or settlement decisions and would comment only on applications formally before it. Romano later disagreed with Smith’s characterization, noting he had met with the City Solicitor. - Commissioners Innamorato and McCoy said the normal appeal/application process should proceed; McCoy said Prestige is capable of using the standard process. - Staff declined to answer many legal-process questions based on counsel’s advice. - Vote: The commission voted 5–1 to forward the resolution to City Council before the next Council meeting. Voting yes: Norman, Romano, Nystrom, Innamorato, McCoy; voting no: Smith; Obert absent. PC 2026-945 – 18-Unit Townhome Development (Old Business) - This major site plan review was continued from August 24, 2026. Adam Fishman of Fairmont Properties represented the applicant. - Fishman explained that the three-story design responds to community quality, smaller unit footprints, economic viability, and nearby buildings. The project had been reduced from 21 to 18 units after earlier Planning Commission direction. - Assistant City Engineer David Rapp and Jeff Jardine of Riverstone Company discussed basins, staging in the adjacent valet lot, and a possible temporary sanitary pump station until Summit County’s system is confirmed. - Architect Bryce Hamill said wood porch railings were intended as a nod to surrounding heritage; elevations are not exact final landscape representations. - Staff clarified that private and public open-space requirements do not apply because the development has ten or fewer lots. Commissioner Romano flagged code-definition questions about townhomes for future attention. - Commissioners discussed road-salt effects on street/landscape plantings and requested a landscaping plan more compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. - No public comments were offered. - Vote: Approved 6–0, with staff recommendations 1–15 followed except recommendation 5, recommendation 11 amended, and the landscape plan revised to be more compatible with surrounding development. PC 2026-916 – Day Care Major Site Plan (Old Business) - The site plan, continued from August, was presented by Jeff Durbon of TLE, who said the company agreed with staff recommendations. - The main debate was whether to require fencing around the dry retention/detention basin. Smith cited Land Development Code Section 1207.07 and Center for Watershed Protection guidance, calling three-foot water depth a life-threatening hazard next to a daycare. Staff read the code as using “encouraged,” not “shall,” for such fencing. - Jardine said the basin slopes meet standards, it is designed as a dry detention basin, and it would not hold standing water. Durbon said TLE, which operates about 460 sites, considers the design safe. - Several commissioners opposed mandatory fencing, citing the Route 303 gateway aesthetic; others agreed with Smith that safety should trump aesthetics. The commission did not add a fence condition. - Other discussion: a 12-inch storm pipe from the 1950s shown on records was not found during excavation; updated budgets were said to be sufficient; landscaping was moved back for snow storage; a sidewalk connection to the public sidewalk was discussed; playground noise is expected below 60 decibels at the fence; sign colors were moderated to black-and-white lettering; and a landscaping bond will be required. - The minutes state the ponds will drain within four hours, while the transcript records a 48-hour drainage time; the commission’s discussion referenced both. The minutes also say the playground closes at 3 p.m., while the transcript references 3:30 p.m. - Vote: Approved 5–1 with staff conditions 1–7, including the landscaping bond. Voting yes: Norman, Romano, Nystrom, Innamorato, McCoy; voting no: Smith; Obert absent. PC 2026-1129 – Standard Shop Company Industrial Business Park (New Business) - This previously approved project is still under construction, with approvals expiring October 2026. Project history is recorded inconsistently: the Industrial Design Subcommittee minutes refer to a 2020 approval, while the transcript and staff presentation refer to approval in late 2022. - The Industrial Design Subcommittee recommended a continuance, reporting uncertainty about which design had been approved and requesting financial assurances. The subcommittee also asked for the north elevation windows to be adjusted to reduce a large unbroken wall. - Charles Wolf said he and Jeff Ningard became majority owners on April 1, 2026; the prior investors retain minority ownership. He described completed improvements, said financing was in place, and asked to start construction quickly. Mark Crowder estimated the remaining landscape budget at $20,000 to $30,000. - Staff and Solicitor Thomas explained that when permits expire, new permits must meet current code, including a new 100-foot residential setback requirement that may require a new variance. - Discussion centered on whether brick columns and rear doors were in the previously approved drawings. The applicant said its stamped approved plans did not include rear doors; staff said the approved set also lacks them, and complete approved plans will be submitted for review. - The commission discussed the project’s long delays, landscaping maintenance, existing tenants, and the need for a clear design path before approval. - Vote: Continued to the October Planning Commission meeting. The minutes record a 4–1 vote (Norman, Romano, Nystrom, Innamorato yes; Smith no; McCoy and Obert absent), but the transcript’s roll call shows Smith voting yes and a 5–0 result. Planned Development Subcommittee Update/Recommendation (Other Business) - The subcommittee recommended limiting future Planned Developments to districts 5, 7, 7 overlay, 8 (Seasons Road), 9, and 11, and revising the purpose statement and definition. Staff recommended forwarding the changes to City Council and requesting a six-month moratorium while the rest of the Planned Development section is rewritten. - Vote: 4–1 to forward the revisions and the six-month moratorium request to the City Solicitor/City Council. Voting yes: Norman, Romano, Nystrom, Innamorato; voting no: Smith; McCoy and Obert absent. Administrative Items - Approval of the August 24, 2026 minutes was continued to the October meeting because enough members who attended the August meeting were not present. The agenda attachment label read “PC Meeting Minutes: September 24, 2026,” although the item under review was the August 24, 2026 minutes. - Correspondence: Norman reported citizen calls about Prestige and email exchanges with Councilwoman Weinstein about Environmental Awareness Committee collaboration and the authority of Planning Commission questions. The commission deferred responding to Weinstein’s administrative-rule comments to the October meeting. Key Outcomes - Forwarded a resolution to City Council opposing the Prestige Settlement Agreement and expressing no confidence in the current Council (5–1). - Approved the 18-unit townhome major site plan (6–0). - Approved the day care major site plan (5–1). - Continued the Standard Shop Company site plan to October (official minutes say 4–1; transcript says 5–0). - Forwarded Planned Development revisions and a six-month moratorium request to City Council (4–1). - Continued approval of August 24, 2026 minutes to the October meeting. - The commission indicated it will request a traffic study before considering the Clinton Crossing application; Council was expected to act the following evening on forwarding the Clinton Crossing application to the Planning Commission. - Adjourned at 11:06 p.m.

The Hudson City Council held a workshop on Tuesday, September 8, 2026, at 7:30 PM in Town Hall. Key discussions focused on updates for the Hudson Innovation Park and the Clinton Crossing development, including community engagement results, housing density, hotel room count, and financing options. Council also reviewed the consent agenda and proposed legislation for the September 15, 2026, regular meeting. Consent Calendar - TMP-8877 (August 2026 Monthly Financial Report): Acknowledged. Highlights: HCTV franchise fees continue to decline; income tax revenue through August is 3% ($700,000) above August 2025 and 3.2% ($739,000) above estimates. Forwarded to September 15 meeting. - TMP-8845 (Ellsworth Meadows Golf Course Hole 17 Retaining Wall Phase 2): Resolution to pre-purchase retaining wall blocks from Mack Industries and authorize bidding. Project extends the wall to protect Hole 3 green and Hole 4 tee box. Forwarded. - TMP-8846 (Ellsworth Meadows Golf Course Stormwater Management Project): Resolution to bid a stormwater storage project in a low-lying area to reduce downstream flooding on Nicholson Drive. Forwarded. - TMP-8871 (N. Main Street Stormwater Improvement Project): Resolution to install a new storm sewer collector system to alleviate flooding on Owen Brown Street, in partnership with a property owner. Forwarded. - TMP-8872 (Forward Clinton Crossing Preferred Site Plan to Planning Commission): Resolution to forward the concept plan for review. Forwarded. Public Comments & Testimony - Council Member Goetz read a letter from resident Todd Zedak expressing strong opposition to the Canterbury Meadows settlement and development, questioning the community benefit and urging council to shut down the project permanently. Discussion Items 26-0072 Hudson Innovation Park Update - Economic Development Manager Katie Behnke reported on: - Salt barn relocation to a western sliver of the site (near Hines Hill Road) to facilitate future sale. Partnership with Summit County Engineer under discussion; construction targeted for next summer after salt depletion. - Excess soil from the Public Works site moved to Innovation Park at no city cost (contractor responsible due to design error). - Property tax abatement options: existing enterprise zone may be valid; council requested a one-page matrix comparing abatement structures (e.g., TIF, CRA) and neighboring community incentives. - Hines Hill Road improvements (between SR 8 and Ohio Turnpike) are a recurring developer concern; council requested estimated costs. - Real estate broker engagement deferred pending further interest. - Council directed staff to provide a detailed memo on tax abatement options and road improvement costs before deciding on next steps. 26-0073 Clinton Crossing Engagement - Community Development Director Greg Hannan presented: - Community engagement: 125 residents in June charrette, 120 in July 1 session (over 100 surveys), 200+ in July 22 session (234 surveys), 145 surveys on August 22 preferred plan. - Survey results: 60% in favor/strongly in favor of the general plan, 27% opposed/strongly opposed (over 2:1 support). - Financial analysis by Bricker & Wyatt: TIF projections tracking that project will recoup city costs; 20-year TIF for north (clock may have started), 30-year non-school TIF for south. - Hotel feasibility: Recommended 70 rooms to attract national brand (e.g., Marriott/Hyatt); traffic study underway for 20 intersections. - Housing: Current concept plan shows 63 units (range 63-74); additional study of 81 units (27 single-family, 54 townhomes) provided. - Council discussion: - Concerns about railroad proximity to hotel, but consultants deemed it feasible. - Debate on density: Some members favored up to 74 units (as presented to public); others preferred 81 to generate more tax revenue for public space. Ultimately agreed on a maximum of 74 units with a mix of single-family and townhomes, converting some single-family to townhomes to achieve the count. Hotel set at 70 rooms. - Requested updated financial projections from Bricker & Wyatt for the 74-unit/70-room scenario before forwarding to Planning Commission. - Staff to present a revised concept plan at the next council workshop. Key Outcomes - Hudson Innovation Park: Council directed staff to produce a one-page summary of property tax abatement options (including TIF and CRA) and an estimated cost for Hines Hill Road improvements, to be reviewed before further action. - Clinton Crossing: Council agreed to a target of 74 housing units (with townhome conversion) and 70 hotel rooms. Staff will prepare a revised concept plan and updated financials for council consideration at the next workshop. The resolution to forward the plan to Planning Commission (TMP-8872) was placed on the consent agenda for September 15. - Short-Term Rental Ordinance (26-78): Postponed to a date certain at the end of October to allow staff to compile feedback from a recent public forum (over 40 attendees) and a survey of neighbors (30% response rate; only 8 of 158 respondents reported contacting owners/managers). - Bond Ordinances (26-124 through 26-130): All forwarded for first reading on September 15. These include financing for Downtown Phase II properties ($740,000 and $925,000 notes), salt storage/bus garage ($6.825M notes), Public Works facility ($21M bonds), Velocity Broadband expansion ($15M notes), Fire/EMS facility renovation ($5M notes), and Advanced Metering Infrastructure ($3M notes). - Canterbury Meadows Settlement (26-118): Forwarded for public hearing and second reading on September 15. - Upcoming Proclamations: Mighty Vincent Day 2026, Jacob Meacham, Kiwanis 75th Anniversary, Constitution Week to appear on September 15 agenda. Meeting adjourned at 9:04 PM.