Public Meetings - Huntington Beach, California

The Huntington Beach City Council met on Tuesday, September 17, 2024, at 4:30 PM (Closed Session) and 6:00 PM (Regular Meeting) in the Council Chambers. The agenda included a closed session for labor and real estate negotiations, a legislative update from California State Senator Janet Nguyen, a consent calendar, a public hearing on the Magnolia Tank Farm Local Coastal Program Amendment, and council member items on a sister city agreement with Ramat Gan, Israel, and physical security upgrades at City Hall. Consent Calendar - Items 11–23 (except Item 12): The council approved the consent calendar (including adoption of minutes, Ordinance No. 4326 on the consent calendar was pulled for separate discussion, and the rest were voted on together). The vote was 7-0 in favor of Items 11 (as amended by supplemental communication) and 13–23. Public Comments & Testimony - Over 60 members of the public signed up to speak. Due to high volume, each speaker was limited to 90 seconds. Topics included: the library petitions (support for Measure U and parental rights), opposition to the sister city agreement with Israel (many citing genocide and human rights concerns), support for and opposition to the Parents’ Right to Know ordinance (Item 12), and testimony on the Magnolia Tank Farm project (both support and opposition). Many speakers also addressed Item 26 (security) and general city issues. Discussion Items - Item 12 – Parents’ Right to Know Ordinance (Ordinance No. 4326): Councilmember Kalmick requested public clarification on legal questions regarding the ordinance, citing a confidential email from the City Attorney. The City Attorney’s office declined to discuss privileged communications. The council debated enforcement, definitions (e.g., “educator”), and potential litigation risks. The ordinance passed 4-3 (Burns, Van Der Mark, Strickland, McKeon in favor; Moser, Bolton, Kalmick opposed). - Item 24 – Magnolia Tank Farm Local Coastal Program Amendment: Staff presented modifications from the California Coastal Commission, including increased open space, 20% affordable housing (up from 10%), and lower-cost hotel rooms. Councilmember McKeon conducted a detailed analysis covering environmental remediation, flooding, and economic benefits. The project was approved 7-0 with an additional minute action to earmark funds for Southeast Huntington Beach capital improvements. - Item 25 – Sister City Agreement with Ramat Gan, Israel: Councilmember Strickland moved to establish a cultural and economic program. Mayor Pro Tem Burns proposed a substitute motion to form an ad hoc committee to vet the partnership. After debate, the substitute motion passed 4-0-3 (Burns, Van Der Mark, Strickland, McKeon in favor; Moser, Bolton, Kalmick abstaining). - Item 26 – Physical Security of City Hall: Councilmembers Kalmick, Moser, and Bolton proposed a study of security technologies (e.g., weapon detection systems). Supporters cited public fear and recent incidents; opponents argued it would create a false sense of fear and that the police department already ensures safety. The motion failed 3-4 (Moser, Bolton, Kalmick in favor; Burns, Van Der Mark, Strickland, McKeon opposed). Key Outcomes - Item 12 (Parents’ Right to Know): Adopted 4-3. - Item 24 (Magnolia Tank Farm): Adopted 7-0, with an instruction to set up a separate account for Southeast HB funds. - Item 25 (Sister City): Adopted 4-0-3 to form an ad hoc committee; further implementation to return to council. - Item 26 (Security): Failed 3-4. - City Manager’s Report – OCPA Withdrawal: The city completed withdrawal from the Orange County Power Authority with zero cost liability to the authority; legal fees of approximately $89,000 were incurred. Councilmembers debated the costs and benefits of the withdrawal, with some noting ongoing savings. - Closed Session: The council recessed to closed session for labor negotiations and real property discussions; a report was given that one item was postponed to after the meeting. - Legislative Update: Senator Janet Nguyen provided an update on state bills, including fentanyl penalties, retail theft, homelessness, and animal shelter reforms. - Next Meeting: October 1, 2024.

The Huntington Beach Planning Commission met on Tuesday, September 10, 2024 at 6:00 PM in Council Chambers. The meeting included two public hearing items: a continuation of the Midway Concepts Mixed Use Project and a detailed review of the Bolsa Chica Senior Care Community Project. After extensive public testimony and commissioner discussion, the Commission voted to continue the Bolsa Chica Senior Care Community Project to the September 24, 2024 regular meeting. Consent Calendar - None. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were made on non-agenda items. Discussion Items Item 24-478: Conditional Use Permit No. 23-007 (Midway Concepts Mixed Use Project) - Commissioner Wood moved to continue the item to the next regularly scheduled meeting on September 24, 2024. The motion was seconded and passed unanimously (6-0, with Commissioner Acosta-Galvan absent). No further discussion. Item 24-596: Bolsa Chica Senior Care Community (REIR No. 21-004, GPA No. 21-004, ZMA No. 21-003, ZTA No. 22-005, CUP No. 21-024) - Staff Presentation: Senior Planner Hayden Beckman presented the revised project, which includes demolition of existing 55,000 sq. ft. commercial space and construction of a four-story, 215,000 sq. ft. convalescent facility with 159 units (25 memory care, 134 assisted living), a subterranean parking garage (82 spaces), and on-site alcohol sales. The project requires a General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment (to establish Specific Plan 19), and a Conditional Use Permit. The revised EIR was recirculated for 60 days (June 20 – August 19, 2024) and 33 comments were received. The final EIR includes responses to comments and mitigation measures. - Applicant Presentation: Thomas Lawless (Heinz) and Christopher Hilbert (Clearwater Living) detailed changes from the original 2023 proposal: height reduced from 65 ft to 49.5 ft (within CG zone), number of stories reduced by one, unit count down 22%, gross square footage down 32%, setbacks increased, independent living units eliminated. They argued that the requested FAR deviation (1.65 vs. 1.5) is necessary to provide adequate amenity space for elderly residents. They also noted that traffic and parking are lower than existing commercial uses permit, and that the project would generate approximately $225,000 annual property tax revenue (up from $18,000) and $3.5 million in development fees. - Public Comments: Approximately 15 speakers addressed the Commission. Positions were divided: - Opposition: Speakers (Jonathan Bonwitz, Tom Dillman, A Marie Hansen, George Maser, Alison Meyer, Brian Thenis, and others) raised concerns about project scale (57 units per acre, 63% denser than surrounding complexes), inadequate parking (104 spaces for 159 units and 110 employees), height (claimed 56 ft from corner due to grade), shadow impacts, traffic, impact on Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, and inconsistency with the General Plan. They argued the project is too massive for the neighborhood and that the specific plan sets a bad precedent. - Support: Speakers (Grant Russell, John Villa, Perry Clitheroe, Henry Good, Adam Wood, Brian Genevieve, and others) emphasized the need for senior housing, the 30% reduction in project size, the economic benefits, and the appropriateness of the use for the site. Some noted that the existing commercial use is 45% occupied and unsustainable. The property owner’s representative stated that if the project is not approved, the owners will entertain other offers, potentially for more intense uses. - A representative from SAFER (Chase Preciato) requested the Commission not certify the EIR due to failure to respond to their comments and raised concerns about formaldehyde off-gassing and energy impacts. Staff noted that a response from LSA (the EIR consultant) was provided to the Commission earlier that day. - Commissioner Deliberation: - Commissioners asked questions about shadow studies, parking ratios (comparison to Tustin project), unit sizes, and the necessity of the specific plan. - Vice Chair Kennedy expressed opposition, stating the project does not meet current zoning (FAR and parking) and that approving it would set a wrong precedent. - Commissioner Rodriguez supported the project, noting the significant reductions and the growing need for senior care. - Chair Twining and Commissioner Pellman requested more time to review the LSA response to SAFER’s comments, which they received late that afternoon. Commissioner Pellman also noted she had not yet had a requested meeting with a community member. - Votes and Continuance: - A motion to continue the item to a date uncertain (by Commissioner Pellman, seconded by Commissioner Wood) failed 3-3 (Pellman, Wood, Twining in favor; Kennedy, Rodriguez, Adam opposed; Acosta-Galvan absent). - A subsequent motion to continue to the next regular meeting on September 24, 2024 was made by Chair Twining, seconded by Commissioner Pellman, and passed 5-1 (Kennedy, Adam, Wood, Pellman, Twining in favor; Rodriguez opposed). The item will be heard at the September 24, 2024 Planning Commission meeting at 6:00 PM. Key Outcomes - Item 24-478 (Midway Concepts Mixed Use Project): Continued unanimously to September 24, 2024. - Item 24-596 (Bolsa Chica Senior Care Community): Continued to September 24, 2024 by a vote of 5-1. The Commission will reconsider the project at that meeting. - The Commission did not take any final action on the project; all applications remain under review. Other Business - Commissioner Pellman provided an update on the Historic Resources Board’s recent activities and upcoming community events (Senior Expo, Civil War reenactment, etc.). - Commissioner Rodriguez announced his resignation from the Planning Commission effective October 31, 2024, as he plans to move out of Huntington Beach. The meeting adjourned at approximately 8:00 PM.

The Huntington Beach City Council/Public Financing Authority met on September 3, 2024, at 6:00 PM in Council Chambers. The meeting included awards, a consent calendar, a public hearing, introduction of an ordinance, and city council member items. Notable actions included approving the consent calendar with several pulled items, continuing a zoning amendment public hearing, introducing a controversial 'Parents' Right to Know' ordinance, and directing staff to prepare tobacco retailer regulations. Awards & Presentations - Mayor Van Der Mark proclaimed September as National Service Club Month, recognizing local service groups (American Legion, Elks Lodge, Kiwanis, Lions Club, Robin's Nest, Rotary Club). Representatives were invited for a photo. Consent Calendar - Approved minutes of August 6, 2024 meeting. - Received the August 2024 update of activities for citizen boards/commissions. - Item 9 (pulled by Councilmember Bolton): Appointed David Cain as Interim CFO; approved employment agreement. Councilmember Bolton inquired about CFO recruitment; staff reported open recruitment is underway; no internal candidates had applied as of the meeting. Motion passed 7-0. - Item 10: Approved lease with HBSC Partners, LLC for two food concessions at the Sports Complex. - Item 11: Approved naming 'Nature Plateau' in Huntington Central Park. - Item 12 (pulled by Councilmember McKeon): Approved Downtown BID Annual Report/Budget and adopted Resolution 2024-41 to continue assessment; set public hearing for Oct 1. Councilmember McKeon requested enhanced maintenance/cleanup, especially after events. Staff noted ongoing analysis of peak times. - Item 13: Approved contract with Hoag Clinic for medical/wellness screenings (not to exceed $158,720). - Item 14: Approved amendment for Miley Keck Tank Farm Lease Closure and appropriation of $241,039 from HB Recovery Funds. - Item 15 (pulled by Councilmember Kalmick): Approved agreements with DHCS and CalOptima Health; appropriated $468,843; expected 142% ROI, returning $3.9 million. - Item 16 (pulled by Councilmember Bolton): Adopted Resolution 2024-44 amending MEO MOU via side letter. Councilmember Bolton asked about meet-and-confer obligations; staff confirmed the side letter was negotiated with MEO. - Item 17: Approved cooperative agreement with DRC Pacific for disaster debris management. - Item 18: Accepted bid from TTS Engineering ($174,624) for retaining wall rehab; authorized change orders up to 15%. Public Comments & Testimony - 49 public speakers addressed the Council on various topics, including: - Support for Agenda Item 20 (Parents' Right to Know): Speakers from Gays Against Groomers and other residents expressed support, arguing the ordinance protects parental rights and opposes state overreach (AB 1955). - Opposition to Agenda Item 20: Many speakers opposed the ordinance, citing risks to LGBTQ youth, potential harm to children with unsupportive parents, and legal concerns. Speakers noted the ordinance is vague, overreaches city jurisdiction, and could lead to costly lawsuits. - Support for Agenda Item 23 (Supervisor Andrew Do): Several speakers demanded Supervisor Andrew Do's resignation over corruption allegations, including the misuse of COVID relief funds. - Support for Supervisor Andrew Do: A few speakers cautioned against premature calls for resignation, citing the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty' and lack of evidence. - Chad Williams Ballot Designation: Multiple speakers supported Chad Williams (candidate for City Council) and criticized a lawsuit challenging his 'Navy SEAL' designation on the ballot. - Other topics: A resident spoke about damage to her home by a contractor (Primeco) and alleged City code enforcement issued fines against her; speakers raised concerns about OCPA exit, library policies, and city finances. Discussion Items - Item 19 (Public Hearing - Zoning Map Amendments): Public hearing on zoning amendments for 133 parcels. No speakers signed up. Councilmember Burns moved to continue the hearing to October 1, 2024, to study the matter further. Staff clarified the amendments do not affect mobile home parks. Motion passed 7-0. - Item 20 (Introduction of Ordinance 4326 - Parents' Right to Know): Councilmembers Moser, Bolton, and Kalmick voiced strong opposition, citing legal overreach, vagueness, and financial risks. Councilmember Strickland defended the ordinance as protecting parental rights. The motion to introduce passed 4-3 (Yes: Burns, Van Der Mark, Strickland, McKeon; No: Moser, Bolton, Kalmick). - Item 21 (Flagpole at John Baca Park): Councilmember Burns proposed installing a 35-45 foot flagpole at John Baca Park. Councilmember Kalmick raised questions about costs ($18,000), CC&Rs, and alternative funding. Motion passed 7-0 for the flagpole and 7-0 for the ceremonial display of the Medal of Honor flag. - Item 22 (Tobacco Retailer Regulations): Councilmember McKeon proposed directing staff to prepare an ordinance establishing regulations for tobacco retailers, including minimum distances from schools and other retailers. Councilmembers Bolton and Moser suggested a study session; the substitute motion to have a study session failed 2-4-1 (Yes: Bolton, Moser; No: Burns, Van Der Mark, Strickland, McKeon; Kalmick passed). Original motion passed 7-0, with direction to coordinate with ABC. - Item 23 (Supervisor Andrew Do - Demand Resignation): Councilmembers Bolton, Moser, and Kalmick introduced a motion to demand Supervisor Andrew Do's resignation. Councilmember Strickland and McKeon expressed concerns about due process, citing lack of evidence and the presumption of innocence. The motion passed 6-1 (Yes: Moser, Bolton, Van Der Mark, Strickland, McKeon, Kalmick; No: Burns). Key Outcomes - Consent calendar approved with variations (items 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 17, 18 passed 7-0; pulled items each passed 7-0). - Public hearing for zoning map amendments continued to October 1, 2024. - Ordinance 4326 (Parents' Right to Know) introduced, with final adoption scheduled for a future meeting. - Flagpole at John Baca Park authorized (7-0), including ceremonial Medal of Honor flag display (7-0). - Staff directed to draft tobacco retailer regulations (7-0). - Council passed resolution to demand Supervisor Andrew Do's resignation (6-1).

The Huntington Beach City Council/Public Financing Authority held a regular meeting on August 6, 2024, starting with a closed session at 4:30 PM and reconvening at 6:00 PM. The meeting covered a wide range of topics, including lawsuit updates, consent calendar approvals, a public hearing for a senior transportation grant, and three council member items. The most contentious items were the proposed "Parents' Right to Know" ordinance (item 30) and a request for an independent audit of the Pacific Airshow settlement (item 31). Over 55 public speakers addressed the council, with comments split between support and opposition for these items. Consent Calendar - Items 14–28 were approved 7-0, except items 18 and 19 which were pulled for separate votes. - Item 18 (positions on state legislation): Support for Senate Concurrent Resolution 165 (designating part of the 405 Freeway as "Surf City Highway") passed unanimously. A resolution supporting Proposition 36 (Homelessness, Drug Addiction and Theft Reduction Act) passed 5-0-2, with Councilmembers Moser and Kalmick abstaining due to a decades-old norm against taking positions on statewide ballot measures. - Item 19 (Carr Park reconfiguration conceptual plan) was amended to include a flagpole and a plaque honoring Medal of Honor recipient Chris Carr, then passed 7-0. Public Comments & Testimony - Pacific Airshow Settlement: Multiple speakers urged the council to support item 31, calling for an independent audit of the settlement. Shammy, a former CEO, described the Visit HB economic impact report as "phony," citing miscalculations and misleading statements (e.g., property tax projections, a vague $120 million figure). Kathy Writer detailed what she claimed were giveaway terms, including $5 million cash, free parking and RV spaces, and city responsibility for CEQA and permits. Speakers like David Reinerson and Tim Geddes characterized the settlement as "corruption" and a "giveaway to a political ally." - Parents' Right to Know (Item 30): Many speakers supported the mayor's proposal to declare Huntington Beach a "Parents' Right to Know" city in response to AB 1955. Supporters (e.g., Susie Fourier, Keith Jorgensen, David Clifford) argued that parents have a fundamental right to be informed about their child's gender identity or expression. Opponents (e.g., Stephanie Camacho Van Dyke from the LGBTQ Center OC, Bethany Webb, and others) argued that AB 1955 does not mandate secrecy but prevents school boards from requiring disclosure, and that forced outing could harm LGBTQ+ youth. - Other Comments: Aaron Hazelett Oaks raised safety concerns after a July 4th stabbing in downtown Huntington Beach, urging increased police presence. Several speakers criticized the council majority for focusing on social issues rather than core city services like potholes, beach restrooms, and financial transparency. Discussion Items - City Attorney's Report: Michael Gates provided updates on three lawsuits. (1) The city's appeal in its federal housing lawsuit against the state is scheduled for oral arguments at the Ninth Circuit in late October/early November. (2) In the state's housing lawsuit against the city, a court struck most punitive measures (fines, loss of land-use authority) and gave the city one year to adopt a housing element after a writ is issued. (3) The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in City of Grants Pass v. Johnson overturning Martin v. Boise was cited as a win for Huntington Beach, which had submitted amicus support. Gates also presented the annual report on the Community Prosecutor Program, noting over 1,100 cases filed, 290 convictions (a 200% increase over the prior year), and expansion to two prosecutors. - Item 30 – Parents' Right to Know Ordinance: Mayor Gracey Van Der Mark introduced the item, directing the city manager and city attorney to prepare an ordinance declaring Huntington Beach a "Parents' Right to Know" city, stipulating that no educator should withhold information about a child's gender identity or expression from parents, and authorizing the city to challenge AB 1955 or join a parent's challenge. Councilmember Kalmick argued that AB 1955 only prevents school districts from mandating disclosure, not from teachers using discretion, and that the city has no jurisdiction over education policy. Councilmember Moser raised questions about legal enforceability, prioritization, and alignment with the city's strategic plan. After debate, the item passed 4-3 (Van Der Mark, Burns, Strickland, McKeon in favor; Moser, Bolton, Kalmick against). - Item 31 – Audit of Pacific Airshow Settlement: Councilmember Kalmick proposed hiring an independent third-party expert to review the settlement agreement costs, city financials, and the airshow's net direct economic benefit. Councilmember Strickland offered a substitute motion to instead hire a different economic impact firm (not Visit HB) to produce a full economic impact report. After discussion, the substitute motion passed 4-3 (Van Der Mark, Burns, Strickland, McKeon in favor; Moser, Bolton, Kalmick against). Councilmembers also voted to waive attorney-client privilege on closed-session communications related to the settlement, allowing the city attorney to provide more details. Gates stated that all terms were fully disclosed in closed session and that no long-term contract exists—only a settlement with a term sheet contingent on future CEQA review. - Item 32 – Taxpayer Transparency: Councilmember McKeon requested a staff report on various tax-sharing and financial concessions made by the city to private entities (e.g., Amazon, car dealerships, COVID rent abatements, the Pier and Elton property purchases). The motion passed 7-0, with the report due at the September 17, 2024 meeting (subject to extension if staff cannot meet the deadline). Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar: Items 14–28 adopted as amended (7-0). Item 18 (Prop 36 support) passed 5-0-2 (Mosier and Kalmick abstained). - Item 29 (OCTA Grant): Resolution 2024-37 adopted 7-0, authorizing application for $56,168 (with $51,000 from OCTA and $5,168 match from the Council on Aging) for senior transportation software. - Item 30 (Parents' Right to Know): Passed 4-3. City attorney to draft ordinance for introduction on September 3, 2024. - Item 31 (Airshow Audit): Substitute motion passed 4-3 to hire an economic impact firm (not Visit HB) to evaluate the airshow's economic benefits. Council also waived attorney-client privilege on closed-session settlement discussions. - Item 32 (Tax Transparency): Passed 7-0. City manager to report back by September 17, 2024, with financial data on tax-sharing agreements.

The Huntington Beach Planning Commission held a regular meeting on July 23, 2024, at 6:00 PM in the Council Chambers. The commission addressed three major agenda items: an appeal of a zoning administrator's approval for a large single-family residence, a citywide zoning map amendment for utility parcels, and an appeal of a conditional use permit for a school district maintenance building. Public comment was extensive on all items. The commission denied the residence appeal, approved the zoning map amendment, and continued the school district item for further study. Consent Calendar - Approved the June 25, 2024, Planning Commission minutes as submitted. Public Comments & Testimony - Phan Residence Appeal (Item 24-481): 21 speakers opposed the project, citing concerns about the size (7,930 sq. ft.), massing, incompatibility with the neighborhood, potential flooding, and fears of future use as a group home. One speaker (the applicant's representative) supported the project, stating it meets all zoning requirements and would be a single-family residence with a covenant restricting non-residential use. Several residents noted that the lot is at a low point prone to flooding and that the proposed weight could impact the adjacent seawall. - Zoning Map Amendment (Item 24-484): Multiple speakers from neighborhoods adjacent to Edison easements and railroad parcels expressed opposition, arguing that the change to Public Semi-Public (PS) zoning could allow future uses such as cemeteries, shelters, or storage, and that the city’s noticing was inadequate. Some speakers supported the amendment as a necessary housekeeping measure. Residents near the Monarch Nature Trail requested that it remain open space. - HBCSD Maintenance Building Appeal (Item 24-485): A large number of speakers opposed the project, citing noise, truck traffic, property value impacts, and the lack of a proper CEQA analysis. Several noted that the school district had already moved dirt onto the site without permits. Supporters, including school board member Dr. Paul Morrow and district staff, argued that the facility is needed to house maintenance operations currently conducted outdoors, saving the district $45,000 per month in lease costs and allowing funds to be redirected to student programs. Discussion Items - Phan Residence Appeal: Staff presented the proposed 7,930 sq. ft., three-story home on an 8,943 sq. ft. lot at 3798 Mistral Drive. The project required a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) due to the third floor. The zoning administrator had approved the project with conditions, including a covenant prohibiting non-residential use. The appeal was filed by Mayor Pro Tem Burns. Commissioners questioned the project’s compatibility with the neighborhood (Land Use Policy 1D and 4D). Commissioner Kennedy expressed concern about the zoning administrator’s unilateral authority. Commissioner Wood noted the third floor triggered the CUP. After public comment, the commission voted 5-0 to deny the CUP and Coastal Development Permit, finding the project incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood. - Zoning Map Amendment No. 24-003: Staff explained that 42 parcels with utility uses (mostly Southern California Edison substations and easements, a railroad, and drainage areas) were inconsistently zoned relative to their General Plan designations. The amendment would rezone them to Public Semi-Public (PS) to achieve consistency. Commissioner Twining made a substitute motion to remove four specific examples (6, 9, 12, and 14) due to community concerns, but the motion failed 2-3. The original motion to approve all 42 parcels passed 3-2. Staff noted that existing nursery uses under Edison lines can continue as non-conforming. - HBCSD Maintenance Building Appeal: The school district proposed a 7,510 sq. ft. metal building on the Kettler Elementary site for maintenance operations. The Design Review Board had recommended moving the building 20 feet east and other conditions, but the zoning administrator modified some conditions. Commissioners criticized the zoning administrator’s override of DRB recommendations and questioned the CEQA exemption (Class 3, 15303). Commissioner Kennedy noted that the staff report incorrectly referenced Class 1 as well. The applicant’s CEQA consultant clarified that only Class 3 was used. After extensive discussion, Commissioner Wood moved to continue the item to a date uncertain, requiring the applicant to provide a noise study and evidence of soil testing for dirt brought onto the site. The motion passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - Phan Residence Appeal: Denied (5-0). The CUP and Coastal Development Permit were denied. The decision is appealable to the City Council within 10 calendar days. - Zoning Map Amendment: Approved (3-2). The amendment will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. - HBCSD Maintenance Building: Continued (unanimous). The item is continued to a date uncertain pending the applicant’s submission of a noise study and soil testing results.

The Huntington Beach City Council and Public Financing Authority met on July 16, 2024, in a combined Study Session (5:00 PM) and Regular Meeting (6:00 PM). The Study Session focused on an update to the Short-Term Rental (STR) program, including enforcement, revenue potential, and possible expansion. The Regular Meeting included a presentation by the New Zealand Lifesaving Team, extensive public comments (29 speakers total), approval of the consent calendar, receipt of the biannual strategic plan update, and introduction of an ordinance amending a pipeline franchise agreement. Councilmember Strickland and City Attorney Gates were absent with permission. Notable public comments centered on the recently disclosed Pacific Air Show settlement, with many speakers criticizing the terms as a giveaway of taxpayer funds. Consent Calendar - Items 4-9 approved unanimously (6-0, Strickland absent): - Approval of minutes from July 2 and July 8, 2024. - Memorandum of Understanding with Huntington Beach Police and Community Foundation. - Agreements with Costa Mesa, Irvine, and Newport Beach for public safety helicopter services. - Contract with All City Management Services, Inc. for crossing guard services (amended per supplemental communication from Lt. Toby Archer). Public Comments & Testimony Study Session Public Comments (7 speakers on STRs): - Catherine LeVachure (HB resident since 1999, STR host) gave the city a "D-" for the current program, citing an arduous permit process and lack of automation. She opposed concentrating unhosted STRs in downtown, advocating dispersion citywide. - Jean Young (Long Beach host representative) encouraged a percentage-based cap tied to housing stock (e.g., 0.5-1%), opposed an arbitrary cap of 200, and recommended voluntary tax collection agreements with platforms. - Katie Yng (17-year resident, hosted STR permit holder) supported expansion and asked that ADUs be allowed as STRs (noted later by staff as prohibited under state law since 2020). She favored raising the cap and letting homeowners decide. - Greg Kelly (hosted STR near Beach/Adams) argued STRs serve middle-class tourists who cannot afford beach hotels and suggested platform-based tax collection to reduce administrative burden. - Phil Larshan (renewing STR permit) said STR income allowed him to retire without depleting retirement funds; he advocated for streamlined permitting and option for unhosted rentals. - Terry Hudgens (resident) pointed out that unhosted properties had fewer complaints per the data, and recommended using a denominator (e.g., complaints per room night) to better measure incidents. - Roger Bloom (resident since 1975, hosted STR operator) opposed expanding unhosted STRs, describing a nightmare experience with an illegal unhosted rental on his block and arguing the city should not sacrifice residents' quality of life for revenue. Regular Meeting Public Comments (22 speakers): - Several speakers (former Mayor Connie Boardman, TJ England, Paula Schaeffer, Wendy Rincon, others) strongly criticized the Pacific Air Show settlement, calling it a "giveaway" of taxpayer money, including $4.9 million payout, 10-year exclusive contract renewable to 40 years, waiver of fees, and provision of 3,500 parking spots. Many questioned City Attorney Gates' absence at the RNC and demanded transparency. - A speaker (Kristen Altbaum) requested formation of a volunteer committee to address illegal fireworks/M80s. - Other speakers addressed national politics, the attempted assassination of Donald Trump, local budget deficits, and support for the air show. - Speakers noting support for the police foundation (Amory Hanson) and for council actions (Jeannie Gooden) were also heard. Discussion Items Study Session: Short-Term Rental Program Update - Deputy Director Jill Boss presented: Over 200 STR permits issued citywide; $1 million in TOT collected in 2023; unpermitted STRs declined from 860 (2020) to 135 (2023). Over half of permitted STRs are in coastal zone/downtown. Complaints (156 over 3 years) concentrated there. Potential revenue from expanding to 200 unhosted STRs estimated between $1.1M and $1.6M annually based on average TOT per unit. Staff recommended considering caps, use-it-or-lose-it policies, third-party vendor for monitoring/auditing, and possible noise monitoring devices. - Council discussion: Kalmick favored a conservative, incremental approach with a cap, buffers to prevent clustering, and third-party tax collection. Bolton asked about automated tax collection (staff noted pros/cons). Moser emphasized enforcement, auditing, and better metrics. McKeon focused on rapid response for quality-of-life issues; code enforcement and police explained current procedures for noise and parking complaints. McKeon suggested a 12-month pilot program. Kalmick noted state law prohibits STRs in ADUs built after 2020. Regular Meeting: FY 2023-2027 Strategic Plan – Biannual Progress Update 2 - Staff reported 41% of plan completed (up 9% from January), 43% in progress, 14% upcoming, 2% on hold. Key accomplishments included updated economic development strategy, $9 million in grants, launch of Streamline Surf City, completion of water master plan, HBFD heart attack care recognition. A public dashboard is in development. Councilmember Moser requested more specific KPIs measuring impact rather than just inputs (e.g., success rates in homelessness programs). Councilmember Bolton asked about grant funding lost due to non-compliant housing element; staff had no figure. The report was received and filed (6-0). Ordinance Introduction: Cardinal Pipeline Franchise Amendment - Staff presented Ordinance No. 4230 to amend the franchise agreement with Cardinal Pipeline, L.P. for oil pipeline operations. The amendment will generate approximately $117,000 annually for 10 years (with CPI increases). HB already has one of the highest franchise fees among comparable cities. The ordinance was introduced unanimously (6-0). Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar approved 6-0 (items 4-9). - Strategic Plan Biannual Update received and filed 6-0. - Ordinance No. 4230 introduced and set for second reading. - No formal action taken on the STR program; council directed staff to return with a draft ordinance incorporating discussion points, including a cap, locational restrictions, and a pilot program. - The next regular meeting is scheduled for August 6, 2024.

The Huntington Beach City Council held a special meeting on July 8, 2024, at 4:00 PM to consider placing a charter amendment on the November 5, 2024, general election ballot. The amendment would require voter approval for city-initiated general plan amendments or zoning changes that, after environmental review (EIR), are found to have significant and unavoidable negative impacts on the environment. The council also considered and adopted three related resolutions (2024-38, 2024-39, 2024-40). After public comment and discussion, the item was approved by a vote of 4-0-3, with three councilmembers absent. Public Comments & Testimony - Perry Clitheroe opposed the charter amendment, arguing it would burden voters with complex environmental decisions, risk permanent harm to development, politicize planning, and exacerbate the housing shortage. He also criticized the rushed scheduling during a holiday weekend. - Tim Geddes opposed the amendment, calling the meeting a "show trial" and accusing the council majority of weaponizing the charter for partisan purposes. He referenced prior measures A and B as similar mistakes. - Amory Hanson strongly supported the amendment, stating it would protect the environment and preserve local control, predicting it would receive historic voter approval. - Russ Neal expressed concerns about the risks of opposing state housing mandates but argued that requiring voter approval makes clear that the fight is with Sacramento, not just the council. - Pat Goodman asked for a delay, noting the lack of fiscal analysis and study session. He clarified that the amendment would not apply to privately initiated projects like the local coastal plan amendment. He also requested correction of the statement about 41,000 units, explaining the RHNA goal is 13,368 units. - Adam Wood (Building Industry Association) opposed the amendment, questioning the rushed process and arguing it would not stop state housing mandates. He warned it would make adopting a compliant housing element harder and trigger builder's remedy, leading to unplanned development. - Ann Palmer supported the amendment, arguing that California housing is unaffordable despite increased supply, and that fighting state mandates is necessary to preserve the city's quality of life. Discussion Items - Staff Presentation: Staff introduced the proposed charter amendment language and ballot question. The amendment states that planning and zoning are local municipal affairs and requires voter approval for city-initiated general plan or zoning changes where an EIR finds significant and unavoidable environmental impacts. Staff presented three resolutions: ordering the submission to voters (2024-38), setting priorities for written arguments and impartial analysis (2024-39), and allowing rebuttal arguments (2024-40). - Councilmember Casey McKeon elaborated on the amendment's genesis: the council was forced to sign statements of overriding considerations for state-mandated housing (13,368 units, requiring up to 41,000 units to meet affordability inclusion). He argued that environmental impacts should not be decided by four council members. He clarified three thresholds: (1) city-initiated general plan or zoning change (not private projects), (2) an EIR is required, and (3) the EIR finds significant and unavoidable impacts. Only then would voter approval be needed. The amendment does not affect private property owners, existing zoning, or specific plans. - Motion and Vote: Councilmember McKeon moved to adopt the item, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Pat Burns. The council voted 4-0-3 (Mayor Gracey Van Der Mark, Councilmember Tony Strickland, Councilmember Casey McKeon, and Mayor Pro Tem Burns in favor; Councilmembers Dan Kalmick, Rhonda Bolton, and Natalie Moser absent). The item was approved. Key Outcomes - Approved Charter Amendment Ballot Measure: The council approved placing a charter amendment on the November 5, 2024, general election ballot. The measure would amend the Huntington Beach City Charter to declare planning and zoning a local municipal affair and require voter approval for city-initiated general plan or zoning changes that an EIR finds have significant and unavoidable environmental impacts. - Adopted Resolution No. 2024-38: Ordering the submission of the charter amendment measure to qualified electors at the November 5, 2024, general election. - Adopted Resolution No. 2024-39: Setting priorities for filing written arguments regarding the measure and directing the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis. The council authorized Mayor Van Der Mark, Mayor Pro Tem Burns, and Councilmember McKeon to author supporting arguments. - Adopted Resolution No. 2024-40: Providing for the filing of rebuttal arguments for the city measure. - Next Meeting: The next regularly scheduled City Council/Public Financing Authority meeting is Tuesday, July 16, 2024.

The Huntington Beach City Council met on July 2, 2024, starting with a closed session at 5:00 PM for two existing litigation items, followed by a regular meeting at 6:00 PM. The meeting included public comments on various topics, particularly the proposed charter amendment (Item 13) regarding environmental protections for general plan amendments. The council also considered positions on state and federal legislation (Item 10) and approved routine consent calendar items. A key outcome was the 4-3 vote to place a charter amendment on the November 2024 ballot, despite concerns about process and potential consequences. Consent Calendar - Items 6-12 (except 9 and 10 pulled): Approved unanimously (7-0) including approval of minutes, election resolutions, appointments, naming of the Shirley Dettloff Interpretive Center, and acquisition of two lots. - Item 9 (Appointment of Jeanne Paris): Passed 4-0-3 (Councilmembers Moser, Bolton, Kalmick abstaining). - Item 10 (Legislation Positions): Considered individually; votes varied (see below). Public Comments & Testimony - 39 speakers signed up; time reduced to two minutes each. - Support for Item 13 (Charter Amendment): Jeannie Paris, Aimry Hansen, Ann Palmer, and Butch Twining expressed strong support, arguing for local control and environmental protection. One speaker called the amendment "brilliant" and said it would protect Huntington Beach's legacy. - Opposition to Item 13: Tim Geddes, Christopher Rini, Pablo Aspas, Adam Wood (Building Industry Association), and Perry Clitheroe opposed, citing costs, poor governance, risk of builder's remedy, and abdication of council responsibility. One speaker noted the proposed amendment would trigger builder's remedy and make housing worse. - Other Comments: Multiple speakers presented a detailed resolution alleging election irregularities in California’s 2022 election, calling for verification of voter rolls and hand-marked ballots. A representative from the Huntington Beach Color Guard requested sponsorship for World Championships. Several speakers urged the council to adopt a compliant housing element. One speaker supported naming the Shipley Interpretive Center after Shirley Dettloff. Discussion Items - City Manager's Report: Announced Fire Department’s reaccreditation as ISO Class 1 (only 503 out of 38,000 departments nationwide) and provided fireworks safety tips for Independence Day. - Item 10 – Legislation Positions: Council took positions on eight bills: - A) Support ACR 182 (Great Pacific Garbage Patch) – passed 7-0. - B) Support S.3830 (Low-Income Water Assistance) – passed 7-0. - C) Oppose AB 2485 (regional housing need) – passed 4-2-1 (Moser no, Bolton abstain, Kalmick no). - D) Oppose AB 2553 (major transit stops) – passed 4-0-3 (Moser, Bolton, Kalmick abstain). - E) Oppose AB 2597 (housing element revisions) – passed 4-0-3 (same abstentions). - F) Oppose AB 3093 (streamlined multifamily housing) – passed 4-0-3. - G) SB 7 pulled back to IRC for further review. - H) Support AB 2574 (recovery treatment disclosures) – passed 7-0. - Item 13 – Proposed Charter Amendment: Councilmember McKeon (joined by Mayor Van Der Mark and Mayor Pro Tem Burns) proposed placing a charter amendment on the November 2024 ballot stating that no city-initiated general plan or zoning change with significant and unavoidable environmental impacts may be approved without a vote of the people. Discussion included: - Councilmember Kalmick: Called the item rushed and undercooked, argued it would harm local businesses and complicate future planning. He noted that CEQA thresholds change and that the proposal could force votes on many routine items. - Councilmember Bolton: Argued the amendment is based on inaccurate legal premises and would not solve the housing element issue; pointed to similar failed ballot-box zoning in Yorba Linda and Costa Mesa. - Councilmember Strickland: Questioned staff on definition of significant impacts and noted this almost exclusively targets the housing element. City Attorney stated the language is appropriate and differs from general law cities. - Councilmember McKeon: Defended the amendment as a high threshold (city-initiated, EIR required) that would only apply to rare permanent impacts; private sector projects are exempt. - Councilmember Moser: Opposed, calling it a political tactic that undermines representative government and creates chaos; urged adoption of a compliant housing element. - Mayor Van Der Mark: Supported, arguing it strengthens local control against state overreach. Key Outcomes - Item 13 – Charter Amendment Passes: Motion passed 4-3 (Van Der Mark, Burns, Strickland, McKeon in favor; Moser, Bolton, Kalmick abstaining). Staff directed to bring back ballot initiative language within 30 days for approval before the July 23 deadline. - Legislation Positions: Adopted as amended (see above). - Consent Calendar: Approved with exceptions noted. - Closed Session: No reportable action.

The Planning Commission met on June 25, 2024, to consider two public hearing items: a citywide zoning map amendment to align 28 parcels with their residential General Plan designations, and a conditional use permit for a new restaurant with alcohol, live entertainment, and dancing. Both items were approved. Consent Calendar - Approved the Planning Commission minutes from May 28, 2024, as submitted. (Commissioner Rodriguez abstained; all others present voted aye.) Public Comments & Testimony - Zoning Map Amendment: Two speakers addressed the commission. George Berg expressed agreement with the proposal. Norm Kramer raised concerns about contamination on railroad right-of-way properties in North Huntington Beach, urging the city to consider designating such areas as open space/park rather than other uses to avoid expensive environmental studies. - Conditional Use Permit: Applicant Murat "Coach" Koch (owner of Coach's restaurants) spoke and answered commissioner questions, confirming his intent for the new establishment. Discussion Items - Zoning Map Amendment No. 24-005 (Mapping Consistency Cleanup - Residential Zones): Staff presented a cleanup project affecting 30 parcels (reduced to 28 after one property owner opted out). The amendment would rezone parcels to match their residential General Plan designations, addressing inconsistencies predating the 2017 General Plan update. Commissioner Kennedy noted the city is now required by State law (AB 821) to match zoning to the General Plan, and criticized past transparency. Commissioner Rodriguez asked about costs for property owners who opt out; staff noted fees could exceed $47,000 plus consultant costs. The commission deliberated and approved the amendment. - Conditional Use Permit No. 24-006 (Coach's Lounge Alcohol and Live Entertainment): Staff recommended approval for a 7,000 sq. ft. restaurant at 8911 Adams Avenue, with alcohol service (ABC Type 47), live entertainment (live bands up to four members, DJ, karaoke, painting activities), and dancing. Police Department conditions included closing exterior doors/windows during entertainment and terminating entertainment at least 30 minutes before closing. Parking analysis showed 123 spaces available; combined demand with adjacent adult care facility was 119 spaces. Commission questions covered hours of operation (Monday–Thursday 11 a.m. to 1 a.m., Friday–Saturday 11 a.m. to 1:30 a.m., Sunday 9 a.m. to 1 a.m.) and notification radius (500 feet). The permit was approved. Key Outcomes - ZMA No. 24-005: Approved (6-0, with one commissioner absent). To be forwarded to City Council. - CUP No. 24-006 (Coach's Lounge): Approved (6-0). Appealable to City Council within 10 calendar days. - Commissioner Kennedy raised concerns about transparency and an upcoming appeal regarding a school bus maintenance facility, urging staff to ensure all requirements are met. - Commissioner Wood noted the Phase 4 zoning cleanup (including railroad right-of-way) was continued from the May meeting and will be brought back at the end of July. - Chair Twining adjourned the meeting to July 9, 2024.