The Alameda City Council met on Tuesday, June 3, 2025, in a hybrid format (Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft joined remotely from Washington, D.C.). The meeting included a closed session, proclamations, a consent calendar, three public hearings, and city manager and council communications. Key actions included introducing an ordinance to revise sewer service charges, amending universal design requirements for townhouses, and adopting the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Master Fee Schedule.
Oral Communications (Non-Agenda):
Public Hearing Comments: No public speakers appeared for any of the three public hearings (sewer rates, universal design, master fee schedule).
7A – Sewer Service Charges (Public Hearing):
7B – Universal Design Ordinance Amendment (Public Hearing):
7C – Master Fee Schedule (Public Hearing):
Next Steps: The next regular City Council meeting is scheduled for June 17, 2025, which will include the budget presentation.
Good authority. All right, everyone. Well, welcome uh to the City of Alameda City Council meeting. Tonight is Tuesday, June third, twenty twenty-five. Um I am Mayor Marilyn as the Ashcraft, as the agenda indicates, I am joining remotely from my hotel in Washington, DC. I'm back doing some lobbying for transportation programs and projects in Alameda County. Um I would like to call the meeting to order, and we are going to um start with a special city council uh meeting closed session. And I would like to first ask our city clerk, Laura Weisinger to call the role. Council members follow. Jensen prior here, Mayor Ezie Ashcraft. And I'm here. Perfect. And so now we will have public comment on closed session items only. Do we have any uh public comment on closed session items, madam clerk? We do not all right. Well uh with that I will close item two public comment on closed session items, and we are about to adjourn to closed session to consider two items, madam clerk. Would you introduce those items, please? Three A as conference of real property negotiators pursuant to government code section five four nine, five six point eight. Property is building five thirty, three ninety West Oris County Avenue, area bounded by West Pacific Avenue, Orion Street, Viking Street, West High Honoraga Avenue, and Central Avenue, the city negotiators of the city manager, base for use and economic development director, base for use manager, and assistant city attorney. Negotiating parties are city of Alameda, Pacific Fusion Corporation, and Heinz Interest Limited Partnership under negotiation, our price in terms of sale. One as plaintiff with a city initiating legal action, the potential defendant is the Port of Oakland. All right. So with that, we will adjourn into closed session, and I will see you in the other room. So you can hear me in the chambers? Yes, we can hear you, and the couple of chairs are hopefully being filled rather quickly. We got one minute. Okay. I don't know. It's close to the bridge. Laura, is the lighting okay, or should I make it brighter? If it's not too much, you could do a little brighter. Okay. It is ten. And uh, do we have everybody? We do. We do. All right. Um, well, good evening, everyone, and welcome to the City of Alameda City Council meeting. Tonight is June third, twenty twenty-five. And the council has just returned from closed session, as you can see. Some of us are in the chambers, and um one of us, which one is not like the others. I am in Washington, DC, and my agenda and my address is posted on the agenda at the Suffitel Hotel in Washington, DC, where I am lobbying with the Alameda County Transportation Commission, hopefully bringing some funding back to our county for projects and programs and roads and safe streets and all those good things. And in any event, the council has just returned from closed session. So I would like to ask our city clerk Laura Weisinger if she would please announce any actions taken in closed session. Yes. So the first item 3A, which was um conversate real property negotiator, staff provided information and council provided direction. Um the motion was uh five eyes with council member Daysog voting no. Um, and regarding uh 3B, was it perhaps four eyes with council? Four eyes, yes. Yes, four.