OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Alameda, California/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

City of Alameda Open Government Commission Meeting - October 5, 2026

City Council — Monday, October 5, 2026
BodyAlameda, California
SessionCity Council
DateMonday, October 5, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 12:52

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

4:30

Agenda item one is our roll call.

4:32

So

Speaker 2

4:34

Commissioners Harris.

4:42

Commissioners, my learning short thing.

Speaker 1

4:45

Moving on to agenda item two, not agenda public comment.

4:48

Do we have any public speakers waiting?

4:53

Moving along.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

We have our minutes for the February 2 2026 meeting.

Speaker 1

5:03

Um I guess we'll run through uh read the title of the item, which is as we've done the minutes of uh February 26th.

5:13

Um are there any questions?

5:16

Any comments um on this item?

5:18

Can I entertain the motion?

Speaker 3

5:20

Uh approve.

5:21

Okay.

Speaker 4

5:21

I would second that.

Speaker 1

5:23

All right.

5:23

Having two motions, so I guess we can take a roll call vote since we don't have uh we can uh enough here

Speaker 2

5:31

uh uh commissioners Harris.

Speaker 1

5:34

Yes.

Speaker 2

5:35

T Los.

5:36

Yes.

5:36

Chair bowling.

5:37

Yes.

5:38

That carries my three eyes.

Speaker 1

5:39

All right.

5:40

Moving on to item three B approve the 2025 annual report.

5:45

Um and uh ask the city clerk if we can get like a a summary, a rundown of brief presentation.

Speaker 2

5:53

Exactly.

5:53

So last year what we did um was uh the commission directed me to go ahead and draft an annual report on your behalf, and I'm happy to do it again.

6:03

You guys provided some feedback on some specifics about the public record request, and we were able to do some but not all of it.

6:10

Uh that same search would be possible again this year if the commission is interested in that level of detail.

6:15

And um we would return at February in February with that um you know with that annual report for you to take a look at.

Speaker 1

6:23

Okay.

6:23

Uh does the um any commissioners have any clarifying questions?

Speaker 4

6:28

I think one of the re requests we had was just to see like uh prior year on some of the statistics prior year versus the new year, because like you know, if we went from a thousand requests to two thousand requests, so you know we could make some findings on it.

6:42

So I think if that was included, I think I'd make the similar request.

Unassigned speaker

6:46

I I don't think we did, I think we always had the the numbers in the annual re prior annual report, but if you want to, I can adjust the remote.

Unassigned speaker

6:52

Yeah, we could do that.

Speaker 2

6:53

Side by side,

Speaker 4

6:54

it always helps just

Speaker 2

6:54

to see the

Speaker 4

6:55

comparisons.

Speaker 3

6:58

I would I would just say that uh it was excellent last year, and uh and just the brief review uh on the documents that we were presented this year, looks like it's been a um a productively uh quiet year.

Speaker 2

7:13

The one thing is we're not exactly sure, but it seems like AI has increased the number of record requests because there's these firms now that are doing like AI stuff with like bid tabulations or contracts, and so and then it feels lately like there's been a lot of email searches.

7:33

I mean we've been buried in them lately, and I'm not exactly we're we have theories, but we haven't quite figured it out yet.

7:39

We're kind of it's all new, but there is definitely an increase in PRAs this year.

Speaker 3

7:43

Perhaps you could ask AI to tell you.

Unassigned speaker

7:45

Yeah.

Speaker 2

7:46

I haven't used it.

7:47

I'm so lame.

7:49

But I could check.

Speaker 1

7:51

Um are there any public speakers, I guess, on this item?

Speaker 2

7:54

None on this item either.

Speaker 1

7:55

Okay, I guess we can move on to any discussion or if anyone wants to make a motion.

8:00

Um I have a follow-up comment um if we have a motion, but

Speaker 4

8:05

I'll love to hear the follow-up comment.

Speaker 1

8:07

Uh yeah, I I really enjoyed last year's report.

8:10

I think the breakout that we did was really good.

8:12

Um hoping that we can um do something similar to that in this year's new report and just kind of carry it forward.

8:19

Um outside of that, I think yeah, you're right, you brought up the AI question.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural█████████████████████████████████████████████80%
Personnel Matters███████████20%
Summary of Proceedings

City of Alameda Open Government Commission Meeting - October 5, 2026

The Open Government Commission of the City of Alameda met on Monday, October 5, 2026, at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 2263 Santa Clara Avenue, Alameda, CA, with remote participation available via Zoom. Commissioners Harris, T. Los, and Chair Bowling were present, constituting a quorum. The Commission unanimously approved the February 2, 2026 meeting minutes, directed staff to prepare the 2026 Annual Report, received a staff update from the City Clerk, and heard commissioners' reflections marking Vice Chair Harris's final meeting. No members of the public provided comment.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No public speakers signed up or came forward for non-agenda public comment, and none spoke on the annual report item.

Discussion Items

  • Minutes of the February 2, 2026 Meeting (Item 3-A): A motion to approve the minutes was made, seconded, and passed 3-0 by roll call vote (Harris, T. Los, Bowling). The Chair referred to the meeting date as "February 26th" in one instance, though the agenda lists it as February 2, 2026.
  • 2026 Annual Report (Item 3-B): The City Clerk reviewed the prior year's process, noting the Commission had directed her to draft the annual report and that the same public-records-request search could be repeated if desired, with a return in February 2027. Commissioners requested a side-by-side comparison of prior-year and current-year statistics for Public Records Act (PRA) requests. A commissioner observed an apparent increase in PRA requests, possibly driven by AI-related firms seeking bid tabulations and contracts, as well as an increase in email searches. The Chair introduced the item as "approve the 2025 annual report," though the agenda identifies it as the 2026 Annual Report; the action taken was to direct staff to prepare the report. Asked whether any hearing-officer hearings had occurred, the City Clerk replied that none had; the only complaint filed all year was dismissed as insufficient. The Commission unanimously directed staff to prepare the report again, including the side-by-side comparison. No subcommittee was formed.
  • Staff Communication (Item 4): The City Clerk reported that the only complaint filed all year — filed June 22 and alleging a June 11 meeting — was deemed insufficient because no such meeting occurred; the body in question, related to the "care team," had not met in years. She also announced that Vice Chair Harris's tenure would end because his appointing authority, Mayor Ezzy Ashkoff, is termed out. The City Clerk noted she will reach 30 years with the City next May. Commissioners praised her competence and the quality of the mandatory training video.
  • Commission Communications (Item 5): Vice Chair Harris indicated this was likely his last meeting, thanking the Commission and the City Clerk. A commissioner echoed appreciation, reflecting on a "good two years" and enjoyable service on the Commission. The meeting was then adjourned without a formal motion, as none was required.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved the February 2, 2026 meeting minutes (3-0; Harris, T. Los, Bowling).
  • Directed staff to prepare the 2026 Annual Report (3-0), including side-by-side prior-year vs. current-year PRA statistics, with a draft to return in February 2027.
  • Acknowledged the City Clerk's report that the only complaint filed all year was dismissed as insufficient.
  • Recognized Vice Chair Harris's final meeting on the Commission.

Meeting Transcript

Agenda item one is our roll call. So Commissioners Harris. Commissioners, my learning short thing. Moving on to agenda item two, not agenda public comment. Do we have any public speakers waiting? Moving along. We have our minutes for the February 2 2026 meeting. Um I guess we'll run through uh read the title of the item, which is as we've done the minutes of uh February 26th. Um are there any questions? Any comments um on this item? Can I entertain the motion? Uh approve. Okay. I would second that. All right. Having two motions, so I guess we can take a roll call vote since we don't have uh we can uh enough here uh uh commissioners Harris. Yes. T Los. Yes. Chair bowling. Yes. That carries my three eyes. All right. Moving on to item three B approve the 2025 annual report. Um and uh ask the city clerk if we can get like a a summary, a rundown of brief presentation. Exactly. So last year what we did um was uh the commission directed me to go ahead and draft an annual report on your behalf, and I'm happy to do it again. You guys provided some feedback on some specifics about the public record request, and we were able to do some but not all of it. Uh that same search would be possible again this year if the commission is interested in that level of detail. And um we would return at February in February with that um you know with that annual report for you to take a look at. Okay. Uh does the um any commissioners have any clarifying questions? I think one of the re requests we had was just to see like uh prior year on some of the statistics prior year versus the new year, because like you know, if we went from a thousand requests to two thousand requests, so you know we could make some findings on it. So I think if that was included, I think I'd make the similar request. I I don't think we did, I think we always had the the numbers in the annual re prior annual report, but if you want to, I can adjust the remote. Yeah, we could do that. Side by side, it always helps just to see the comparisons. I would I would just say that uh it was excellent last year, and uh and just the brief review uh on the documents that we were presented this year, looks like it's been a um a productively uh quiet year. The one thing is we're not exactly sure, but it seems like AI has increased the number of record requests because there's these firms now that are doing like AI stuff with like bid tabulations or contracts, and so and then it feels lately like there's been a lot of email searches. I mean we've been buried in them lately, and I'm not exactly we're we have theories, but we haven't quite figured it out yet. We're kind of it's all new, but there is definitely an increase in PRAs this year. Perhaps you could ask AI to tell you. Yeah. I haven't used it. I'm so lame.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com