Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The Alameda Public Utilities Board held a special meeting on October 19, 2026, from 6:00 p.m. to 6:52 p.m. Present were President Hunter, Commissioner Byrd, and Commissioner DeVries; Commissioner McKenna and City Manager Bowden were absent. The board approved the consent calendar with one item postponed, heard public comment, received an information-only presentation on outage management, and took up the General Manager’s September 2026 report.
Okay, I'd like to call to order the October 19th, 2026 special meeting of the public utilities board at 6 o'clock p.m. Members of the public can attend in person or follow via web or teleconference. They can address the public utilities board during the meeting in person over web teleconference or via email. May you please have a roll call vote. President Hunter? Yes. Commissioner Byrd? Yes. Commissioner DeVries. Here. And um Commissioner McKenna and City Manager Bowden are absent. Okay. The second item on the agenda is oral communications. Members of the public are invited to address the board on any subject related to the activities of Alameda Municipal Power, not otherwise appearing on the agenda. Comments are limited to in-person only. Remote comment is not available to this section. Do we have any of the members or do we have any members of the public present who would like to speak? Yes, I'd like to invite um Mr. William Morrison to speak. Okay, great. Thank you, Mr. Morrison. And um we get uh is it three minutes? And I have 40 minutes to talk, right? Good evening, uh members of the board. Name is William Morrison. I in various times in the past represented the Fernside Homeowners Association. I'm here once again, pretty much in that same capacity, and very quickly to point out Fernside Home Fernside the Association is the old Cohen property. Both of the houses there were built and bought and lived in since about 1929 to maybe 1940. So the that's the type of architecture and background we have. We have in the it's it's never, you know, pretty much changed from that viewpoint. And the reason why I represented them is because that means they are natural gas dominant predominant. They're the heating comes from natural gas and the cooling comes from God. You know, so that's where we are on that one. And things have not changed. And I have no real difficulty with heat pumps. I will state in the past that I was working with someone at one point in time who was working on thermal heating solar thermal heating, as far as that went. And I'm very h very good mechanical engineer pointed out to me that natural gas beats it hands down. And when it comes to heating, I think you're gonna still find natural gas has a strong, shall we say, positive position. Cost wise. I'm not sure about efficiency, but cost wise, especially given the cost per kilowatt hour of electricity in the city. And so from that viewpoint, I would like for the board to continue to shall we say, look at that persp perspective. One of the things I found is that when you really can't beat somebody, you then malign it and get rid of it. And our our air control board is working really hard on getting rid of methane. So that's where it is. And from that viewpoint, uh again, uh, I'm not exactly sure that a lot can be done about that. But you know, I just like to point it out, there is a very large block in the eastern of Alameda that really would have a problem without methane. The only other thing I wanted to bring out is in the past, uh, when I was first around, uh, we went to electronic meter uh systems, and the main reason for that was for better communication, better information.