OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Alameda, California/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Alameda Commission on Access for People with Disabilities Meeting - October 19, 2026

City Council — Monday, October 19, 2026
BodyAlameda, California
SessionCity Council
DateMonday, October 19, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:33:22

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

10:07

Smith who's here as well for our as our staff representative tonight.

10:10

Thank you, Aaron, for being here.

10:12

And uh we're gonna call the commission meeting to order at 6 31 p.m.

10:18

Um you do roll call.

Speaker 2

10:21

Great, let's do roll call.

10:23

Um

Speaker 3

10:45

we can't your microphone's not working.

Speaker 2

10:48

Can you hear us, Commissioner?

Unassigned speaker

10:54

She's on mute, too.

Speaker 4

10:58

I hear something now.

10:59

I don't know which I didn't hear anything before, and I'm not sure which commissioner you were talking to.

Speaker 2

11:04

Great, just taking roll call.

11:05

Uh Commissioner Knieedler?

Speaker 4

11:07

Present.

Unassigned speaker

11:08

Great.

Speaker 2

11:08

Commissioner Lyons?

11:10

Here.

11:10

Commissioner Lipp.

11:11

Here.

11:12

Commissioner Schmitz?

11:13

Here.

11:13

Commissioner Bieler.

11:14

Present.

11:17

Thank you.

11:18

That's uh five present commissioners.

Speaker 1

11:20

Great.

11:20

Well, thank you very much.

11:21

And it's really wonderful to have people here tonight.

11:24

We are UTR commission meetings are not very well attended, so this tells me that people care, which is a wonderful thing.

11:30

Uh we're thrilled that I think we have some speakers on Zoom tonight as well.

11:33

Is that correct?

Speaker 2

11:34

Yeah, as of this point in time, we have seven speakers.

11:41

Um I'm not aware of which item yet, but when we get to the items, we'll ask them to raise their hand.

11:45

But there's seven remote participants.

Speaker 1

11:47

Wonderful.

11:48

So what we'll probably do tonight is because there's so many speakers, we'll limit the comments to two minutes to make sure that everybody has a chance to speak and be heard.

11:56

Uh so good, fellow commissioners?

11:59

Okay, great, great.

12:00

Um, so first of all, we're gonna start out with the non-agenda public comment.

12:03

So if anybody has any public comments that are not on the agenda tonight, uh now is your time to let us know hear it.

Speaker 2

12:10

We do have one speaker, um, Commissioner Lipp.

12:13

Um Jinky Barreto, please.

12:19

Great.

Unassigned speaker

12:20

Um

Jenky · Speaker 5Inferred

12:23

these days, I'm not really

Unassigned speaker

12:24

sure.

Speaker 2

12:25

I also have a remote microphone

Unassigned speaker

12:27

if I have

Speaker 1

12:32

thank you.

12:33

And we're glad to have you here tonight.

Jenky · Speaker 5Inferred

12:35

Hello, it's my first meeting here.

12:36

My name's Jenky, I live in Alameda.

12:39

Um I just uh wanted to ask some questions about like the disabled parking spaces.

12:45

I know that there's some new ones in in town, which are great.

12:48

Uh notice one next to uh the movies across the street from the movies, and uh by that Tucker ice cream.

12:55

So there's some new disabled spaces, which is great.

12:58

Um, but what I want to know is who monitors them because there's always people who are parked there illegally.

13:05

Um, even at the post office, the small post office over here, there's only one or two disabled spots, and everybody's just dropping off packages, and if I confront them, they want to fight with

Unassigned speaker

13:16

me.

Jenky · Speaker 5Inferred

13:17

Yeah, so who monitors them?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Accessibility█████████████████████████████████33%
Public Works████████████████16%
Public Engagement████████████████16%
Tree Preservation██████████████14%
Public Comment██████████10%
Sidewalk Maintenance██████6%
Procedural█████5%
Summary of Proceedings

Alameda Commission on Access for People with Disabilities Meeting Summary - October 19, 2026

The Alameda Commission on Access for People with Disabilities met on October 19, 2026, at 6:31 PM. The meeting featured a staff presentation on the Mastic Senior Center ADA upgrade project, a detailed discussion and public hearing on the Gibbons Drive Sidewalks and Tree Plan, and the postponement of a pesticide use informational item. Public participation was heavily weighted toward the Gibbons Drive item, with numerous residents urging the commission not to endorse the current draft plan.

Consent Calendar

  • The commission unanimously approved the minutes from the May 13, 2026, meeting via a roll call vote (5-0).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Non-Agenda Comment: Jinky Barreto asked about enforcement and reporting mechanisms for disabled parking violations.
  • Mastic Senior Center: Carol Gottstein, a Mastic Advisory Board member who uses a walker, strongly criticized the ADA upgrade plan. She argued it ignored the most critical accessibility barriers, specifically the lack of automatic door openers (push pads) on the main lobby restrooms, which are used by the general senior population.
  • Gibbons Drive Sidewalks and Tree Plan (Multiple Speakers):
    • Most speakers urged the commission to reject the plan as written. Specific concerns included:
      • The 20% tree removal cap was too high (many advocated for a 10% cap).
      • The plan lacked objective, measurable criteria for tree removal decisions.
      • There was insufficient community engagement and a lack of a formal community advisory committee.
      • The plan prioritized tree removal over creative, preservation-focused sidewalk repair solutions (e.g., meandering sidewalks, steel root plates).
    • Representatives from the community collected over 1,200 petition signatures opposing the plan.
    • Several speakers referenced the planning board's recent meeting, noting that it unanimously found the plan required significant revisions.
    • One speaker highlighted the extreme heat danger for disabled individuals on unshaded pavement, urging preservation of the canopy for safety.

Discussion Items

  • Item 6379: Mastic Senior Center ADA Upgrade Project

    • Staff (Chandani Patel) presented the 95% construction drawings. The project addresses 239 observations. 83% will be fully compliant. The project is phased over a two-year construction period, but funding for construction has not been fully appropriated.
    • Commissioners questioned the reliance on a single accessible path and distant restrooms. They expressed overwhelming consensus that automatic door openers should be a priority.
    • Staff agreed to explore adding push pads to the scope and developing temporary access plans. They noted the current temporary solution is propping restroom doors open.
  • Item 6385: Gibbons Drive Sidewalks and Tree Plan

    • Staff (Aaron Smith) and arborist Ryan Suttle presented the draft plan to balance the legal obligation for accessible sidewalks with tree preservation. The plan recommends a preservation-first, location-by-location approach with a 20% maximum tree removal cap per five-year period.
    • Commissioners were swayed by the volume and passion of public testimony. Commissioner Canadler noted the troubling disparity in turnout between the disability-focused Mastic item and the Gibbons item.
    • Commissioner Lyons, speaking from personal mobility experience, stated that the current Gibbons sidewalks are completely impassable for mobility scooters, making accessibility a non-negotiable priority.
    • Commissioner Bieler acknowledged that the Planning Board had submitted substantial revision recommendations that had not yet been incorporated into the draft before the commission.
    • The commission formed a consensus not to endorse the plan and to work on formal recommendations.
  • Item 6380: Pesticide Use

    • Commissioner Schmitz requested the item be continued to allow time for review. The commission voted unanimously (5-0) to continue the item to the December meeting.

Key Outcomes

  • Mastic Senior Center: Staff was directed to report back on incorporating automatic door openers (push pads) into the project scope and temporary access solutions.
  • Gibbons Drive Plan: The commission declined to endorse the plan. The commission will schedule a special meeting to draft formal feedback for the City Council, emphasizing the urgency of accessibility and incorporating public and Planning Board feedback before the December 1 Council hearing.
  • Pesticide Use Item: Continued to the next regular commission meeting in December.
  • Community Engagement Disparity: Commissioner Canadler highlighted the high public engagement on trees vs. senior access barriers. The commission committed to improving outreach to ensure Mastic Senior Center members and other disability communities have accessible avenues to provide input.

Meeting Transcript

Smith who's here as well for our as our staff representative tonight. Thank you, Aaron, for being here. And uh we're gonna call the commission meeting to order at 6 31 p.m. Um you do roll call. Great, let's do roll call. Um we can't your microphone's not working. Can you hear us, Commissioner? She's on mute, too. I hear something now. I don't know which I didn't hear anything before, and I'm not sure which commissioner you were talking to. Great, just taking roll call. Uh Commissioner Knieedler? Present. Great. Commissioner Lyons? Here. Commissioner Lipp. Here. Commissioner Schmitz? Here. Commissioner Bieler. Present. Thank you. That's uh five present commissioners. Great. Well, thank you very much. And it's really wonderful to have people here tonight. We are UTR commission meetings are not very well attended, so this tells me that people care, which is a wonderful thing. Uh we're thrilled that I think we have some speakers on Zoom tonight as well. Is that correct? Yeah, as of this point in time, we have seven speakers. Um I'm not aware of which item yet, but when we get to the items, we'll ask them to raise their hand. But there's seven remote participants. Wonderful. So what we'll probably do tonight is because there's so many speakers, we'll limit the comments to two minutes to make sure that everybody has a chance to speak and be heard. Uh so good, fellow commissioners? Okay, great, great. Um, so first of all, we're gonna start out with the non-agenda public comment. So if anybody has any public comments that are not on the agenda tonight, uh now is your time to let us know hear it. We do have one speaker, um, Commissioner Lipp. Um Jinky Barreto, please. Great. Um these days, I'm not really sure. I also have a remote microphone if I have thank you. And we're glad to have you here tonight.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com