Alameda Planning Board Meeting – October 28, 2024
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Alameda Planning Board Meeting – October 28, 2024
The Alameda Planning Board met on Monday, October 28, 2024, at 7:00 PM in the City Hall Council Chambers. Four board members were present (Sue, Hom, Wang, Saheba), three were absent, and a quorum was established. The board approved the September 23, 2024 meeting minutes and, after a public hearing and deliberation, approved an indefinite extension of the Planned Development Permit for St. Joseph’s Community (1109 Chestnut Street) with an amendment to allow flexibility in the timeline for redesigned street closure improvements. The meeting adjourned at 7:46 PM.
Consent Calendar
- 4-A – Draft Meeting Minutes – September 23, 2024: Staff noted minor typos; the board approved the minutes with corrections (motion by Saheba, second by South; all present members voted aye; three absent).
Public Comments & Testimony
- Non-Agenda Public Comment (first opportunity): No speakers.
- Public Hearing – 1109 Chestnut Street: One Chestnut Street resident asked whether the street closure hours would change (staff confirmed no change) and requested clarification on a previously abandoned street segment (staff explained it is private property). The resident did not express opposition.
- Non-Agenda Public Comment (second opportunity): No speakers.
Discussion Items
- 5-A – PLN24-0494 – 1109 Chestnut Street – Planned Development Amendment (St. Joseph’s Community):
- Staff Presentation (Steve Buckley, Planning Services Manager): Reviewed the history of PD-98-01, originally approved with a 10-year term and a daytime street closure during school hours. The permit was extended in 2009 (Resolution PB-09-22) and is set to expire November 2024. Staff recommended an indefinite extension because the conditions are functioning well, and it would allow integration with the forthcoming Chestnut Street Greenway project. The current metal barricades do not meet current engineering standards; staff proposed deferring to the city engineer to design a more aesthetic, safe closure that accommodates pedestrians and cyclists. Staff also noted the extension would maintain all existing conditions (enrollment cap, parking, event management, etc.).
- Applicant Presentation (Father Steve Kane, Principal, St. Joseph Notre Dame High School): Expressed full support for the extension, emphasized student safety, and stated willingness to partner with the city on the street closure redesign. He noted the school currently has no major expansion plans and seeks to be a good neighbor regarding parking concerns.
- Board Discussion:
- Board members asked about the typical duration of Planned Development permits (staff noted indefinite is common once vested).
- Concerns were raised about granting an indefinite term given potential future transportation changes; staff clarified that the street closure is governed by a separate encroachment agreement under the city engineer’s authority, and that the Planning Board retains the ability to revoke or modify the permit under Condition 33.
- Board member Saheba requested adding flexibility to the timeline in Condition 2 (30/90/180 days for insurance, plan approval, installation) to allow the city engineer to grant reasonable extensions. Staff agreed; the amendment was incorporated as “letter E.”
Key Outcomes
- Consent Calendar: Approved with typographical corrections.
- Motion on 5-A (1109 Chestnut Street): Motion by (unnamed board member, second by Wang) to approve Resolution PB-24-XX as amended to include an additional finding allowing the city engineer to grant reasonable extensions for the street closure improvements. All present members voted aye; three members were absent. Motion carried.
- Next Steps: The city engineer will negotiate an encroachment agreement with the applicant and integrate the street closure redesign with the Chestnut Street Greenway project. The applicant will submit required insurance and conceptual plans within the modified timeline.
- Upcoming Meetings: The next Planning Board meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, November 12, 2024 (due to the Monday holiday), and will include three items related to Alameda Point.
- Board Communication: An update on the Performing Arts Theater at Alameda Point will be presented as a study session to the full board at the November 12 meeting.
Meeting Transcript
The meeting of the planning board for October 28th, 2024 to order and uh roll call, please. Uh good evening. Uh board member Sue. Here. Board Member Hom. Here. Board Member Wang. Here. And board member Saheba. Present. Okay, we have a quorum. We have three absences tonight. I was informed in advance of the meeting that they would be absent. Yeah, so I am sitting in on behalf of board press and aris to chair this meeting. So we'll start off. Oops, the Pledge of Allegiance. Skipped that. My uh order. Pledge of allegiance. I do allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. To the Republic for which it stands one nation under God. Invisible liberty and just okay. Thank you. Board member South. Um agenda changes. Any agenda changes staff or board members? Not for me. No. Okay. And next item number three is the non-agenda public comments. This is a period for anyone uh either in the audience or online to speak for up to three minutes regarding any item that's not on the agenda. Uh anyone in the audience like to speak or anyone logged in that have submitted a public comments card. Uh we have no speaker slips, and I don't see any hand ra hands raised at present. Okay. All right. So we'll move on to the consent calendar item 4A. The only consent calendar item has to do with the draft meeting and minutes of September 23rd, 2024. Any amendments to those meet minutes at all? And if not, I'll entertain a motion. Oh, I I will just note I I I found I found three or four little typos that I can fix in the final version. Oh, okay. And I I guess the other thing was do we have a quorum to approve the minutes? Yes, you do. Okay, great. So other than um the typos and minor corrections that staff mention. Um do I have a motion? Well, hold on. You have to open it for public comment. Oh, yes. Oh, yeah.
openpublica.com