OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Allentown, Pennsylvania/Meeting Portal
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Allentown HARB Meeting Summary - August 4, 2026

Meeting Portal — Tuesday, August 4, 2026
BodyAllentown, Pennsylvania
SessionMeeting Portal
DateTuesday, August 4, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 29:41

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

I think we are gonna draw this meeting open at 602.

0:03

So welcome to the historical architecture review board meeting of uh Monday, August 3rd, 2026.

0:10

Harb is an advisory body to city council.

0:12

City council renders the final decision of hard recommendations.

0:16

Under the direction of historic design guidelines, hard review covers the general design, arrangement, texture material, and color of a building or structure.

0:27

Anyone in attendance wishing to comment on any of the items on tonight's agenda are required to sign in for records purposes, just send them up there.

Unassigned speaker

0:34

Oh

Speaker 2

0:34

yeah,

Speaker 1

0:35

be in

Speaker 2

0:35

a pain

Speaker 1

0:35

to sign up for the grand.

0:39

Oh we'll get that pen.

0:42

Staff will introduce and present a the proposal through a prepared report, which was provided to the applicant and board members for review prior to this evening's meeting.

0:52

The applicant can then provide additional context to the proposal before discussion.

0:56

Presentations are limited to 30 minutes and comments for any interested party other than the applicant are limited to five minutes.

1:02

Um after the presentation, the board will discuss the merits of the project among themselves and will ask the applicant and staff for relevant information to supplement the discussion.

1:11

After the deliberation, Harb will recommend to approve as submitted or approve with conditions, denial designation, or table the project for further discussion.

1:19

If the applicant is not present at the meeting, or if information provided is not sufficient, the board may table a project until the next meeting to provide the opportunity for the applicant to be present and or supply sufficient information for discussion.

1:32

Proposal will only be tabled once.

1:34

If requirements are not satisfied at the following meeting, the board may automatically recommend denial

Speaker 3

1:39

and

Speaker 1

1:39

require the applicant to reapply for a new certificate of appropriateness.

1:43

Our recommendations will be forwarded to the next available city council meeting for final resolution.

1:47

Meanwhile, no work can proceed until a council resolution or certificate of appropriateness is received.

1:53

Once uh received, you will then be able to pull initial permits associated with your project.

1:59

All right, let's move into

Speaker 3

2:00

roll call.

Speaker 4

2:02

Starting with roll call.

2:04

Um

Speaker 5

2:09

AJ Jordan.

2:11

AJ Me.

2:14

Alex and Scalesman.

Speaker 4

2:15

Here.

Speaker 5

2:16

Philip Hart.

Speaker 4

2:17

Yeah.

Speaker 3

2:17

David Huber.

2:19

Oh

Speaker 4

2:19

here.

Speaker 3

2:20

Ivy Westerman.

Unassigned speaker

2:24

All

Speaker 4

2:24

right.

2:25

And that concludes our roll call.

Speaker 2

2:30

Meeting

Speaker 4

2:30

that.

Speaker 1

2:31

Okay.

Unassigned speaker

2:32

All

Speaker 1

2:32

right, moving straight into new business.

2:34

Um 37 North 17th Street.

2:38

All right.

2:39

Yes.

2:39

All right.

2:40

Uh, do you mind stating your name and address for the record?

Speaker 2

2:42

Uh my name is uh Richard Jerome.

2:44

We all know the 37th Street.

Unassigned speaker

2:46

Okay,

Speaker 2

2:46

great.

Speaker 1

2:47

We'll begin with a staff reading and then we'll

Unassigned speaker

2:51

uh

Speaker 6

2:51

37 North 17th Street is located in the West Park Historic District.

2:56

It's a two and a half story brick arts and craft style uh four square, uh circa 1914.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Historic Preservation█████████████████████████████████████████████77%
Procedural████████████21%
Technology and Innovation█2%
Summary of Proceedings

Allentown Historical Architecture Review Board Meeting Summary - August 4, 2026

The Allentown Historical Architecture Review Board (HARB) met on August 4, 2026, at 6:02 PM. Board members present included AJ Jordan, Alex and Scalesman, Philip Hart, David Huber, and Ivy Westerman. The board approved a fence installation with conditions, tabled a project due to the applicant's absence, and held policy discussions on plan revision disclosures and the use of AI imagery.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Richard Jerome, applicant for 37 North 17th Street, presented his proposal for a wrought iron fence. He expressed strong support for the project, describing it as "beautiful," and stated it would match a fence planned by his neighbor, who will file a separate application. He accepted the board's conditions regarding engineering plan submissions and tree mitigation.

Discussion Items

  • 37 North 17th Street (New Business): Staff recommended approval for a black metal fence, finding it historically appropriate. Discussion focused on the proposed concrete footer, its potential impact on a street tree, pedestrian safety, and the fence's extent. The board stressed the need for the fence line to remain continuous around the tree. The applicant agreed to the conditions.
  • 223 North 17th Street (New Business): The applicant was absent. A motion to table the item for one month was made, seconded, and carried.
  • Procedural & Policy (Other Business): Philip Hart formally placed on record that applicants must explicitly declare all changes to revised plans, referring to a previous issue where a project's window count changed without clear disclosure. The board discussed requiring greater specificity and utilizing a digital checklist. The board also cautioned that AI-generated images require strict verification of materials and dimensions from applicants.
  • Public Outreach: Upcoming window restoration workshops (Aug 5, 19, 26) and a door hangers community engagement event were announced.

Key Outcomes

  • 37 N 17th Street: Approved with conditions (unanimous). Conditions: submit engineering plans for staff and city review; maintain fence height and continuity around the existing tree; compliance with Chapter 3, Section 3.1.2 (Fences and Streetscape Features).
  • 223 N 17th Street: Tabled for one month.
  • Policy Guidance: Board affirmed the expectation for explicit disclosure of plan changes and detailed material specifications when AI renderings are used.

The meeting was adjourned at 6:31 PM.

Meeting Transcript

I think we are gonna draw this meeting open at 602. So welcome to the historical architecture review board meeting of uh Monday, August 3rd, 2026. Harb is an advisory body to city council. City council renders the final decision of hard recommendations. Under the direction of historic design guidelines, hard review covers the general design, arrangement, texture material, and color of a building or structure. Anyone in attendance wishing to comment on any of the items on tonight's agenda are required to sign in for records purposes, just send them up there. Oh yeah, be in a pain to sign up for the grand. Oh we'll get that pen. Staff will introduce and present a the proposal through a prepared report, which was provided to the applicant and board members for review prior to this evening's meeting. The applicant can then provide additional context to the proposal before discussion. Presentations are limited to 30 minutes and comments for any interested party other than the applicant are limited to five minutes. Um after the presentation, the board will discuss the merits of the project among themselves and will ask the applicant and staff for relevant information to supplement the discussion. After the deliberation, Harb will recommend to approve as submitted or approve with conditions, denial designation, or table the project for further discussion. If the applicant is not present at the meeting, or if information provided is not sufficient, the board may table a project until the next meeting to provide the opportunity for the applicant to be present and or supply sufficient information for discussion. Proposal will only be tabled once. If requirements are not satisfied at the following meeting, the board may automatically recommend denial and require the applicant to reapply for a new certificate of appropriateness. Our recommendations will be forwarded to the next available city council meeting for final resolution. Meanwhile, no work can proceed until a council resolution or certificate of appropriateness is received. Once uh received, you will then be able to pull initial permits associated with your project. All right, let's move into roll call. Starting with roll call. Um AJ Jordan. AJ Me. Alex and Scalesman. Here. Philip Hart. Yeah. David Huber. Oh here. Ivy Westerman. All right. And that concludes our roll call. Meeting that. Okay. All right, moving straight into new business. Um 37 North 17th Street. All right. Yes.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com