So I took Julie's and I rewrote the comments.

So the two resolutions that you have in front of you are one is about jurisdictional clarity on how we make how you deal with decisions and how you make the rules.

That's one.

And the other one is uh the issue that we seem to have unanimous agreement on to call for involvement of community councils.

Now it may be as we talk if you don't you don't like someone whereas is but I'm hopeful that the intent of the resolutions will match the discussion that we've heard.

Um I unfortunately have immersed myself way too much in this, and so I'll have a whole bunch of background stuff if needed and call for it.

Um I would appreciate the opportunity to bring that up to speak sure and I I would follow up with that because I was at um the birchwood, yeah, the birchwood community council meeting, and and there was a talk about variants, one of the variances that one of the neighbors is asking for, and it came out very clear, and it makes sense that we don't want to come, you can't come out with the variance because you don't like what they're doing.

Uh they're trying to close a stream vacation.

They yeah, they want to they have a streaming vacation, yeah.

They want to vacate that area, and they can't come out and save because they don't like the gaming hall.

They have to come out and say it because there's a bar in the way in the shed.

So that makes sense to me.

Anyone else?

The only other thing that happened since the last time we met is there was uh notification that came out from the new head of the department of the interior, and he has pulled uh 40 decisions that were made under the Biden administration.

And of those 40, one of them is the one that authorized uh this uh the Idol allowment to become a casino.

I don't come out against that or for that.

I merely list that as one of the rationales for potentially asking for a pause in construction.

That's the only other change that that I know.

Oh, I also have there was some discussion about the the environmental assessment and what was in it, what wasn't in it, and so I I have that and I also created a list of what we in virtually see as problems with the environmental assessment document.

So I can provide that, but I don't want to just throw it out there because uh you may not you may not jive with that, but it's here if if anybody has any questions.

Okay.

Oh one more thing and then I'll be quiet.

I do if we move these resolutions, I have copies of them here that are available for the people in public.

I mean I made 40, not a hundred, I made less.

Um the way the the way the contractor, the the guy that is carrying that case, the surveyor, he he it was very clear to him that you you couldn't come out and say you didn't like something just because you want to you wanted to vacate it just because something might be bad happen.

I just that's what he came out and said, so I'm just sharing what he told us.

Anyone else have all the board members seen Julie's resolutions that you emailed?

She's trying to get copies right now.

I don't know.

I have read Julie's and our council took action on Debbie's.

So we I'm more prepared to take action on Debbie's.

Oh, I see the holding up in the resolution that's probably important.

The other thing that I should mention is I did respond to that email because we are battled by the Open Babies Act, and four is our magic number.

And there were already three people talking back and forth.

And so I I didn't all I did is tell Julie I'm not with you.

So I read them, but um I didn't respond to that.

I just wanted privately until we run the entire thread.

That's better than that.

Well, there's no more discussion from the anybody in the crowd here have anything to say.

Go ahead and I don't understand what vacate the road, what road there's a small road that goes between two houses, and it's called Sean Street.

Okay, and it and it's just it's it's about a block long, but it's never been done.

It's only been planned.

It's like in the if you look at the real road yet.

No, not yet.

But they're concerned that the casino will probably punch it through because they bought the property all the way to that road, so they can circles.

Oh, I know where you mean.

Yeah, okay.

So that would give the road, take the road back from the public and give it to the private landowner so it would become private land.

Oh, there's already houses out.

Yeah, there's a shed.

Well, they built a shed in the road right away.

So now they want it.

Any uh anybody else?

I guess I better say something, then I'll keep my mouth shut.

Um, and I apologize for the Thursday night meeting, and I was not acting extremely professionally.

One of the issues that I heard on the Thursday night meeting was um uh hesitancy or reluctance to move forward on these resolutions because we haven't heard from a Klupna or a clue that hasn't been given the chance.

Um I think if we kind of look at it possibly in a different way, um nobody to my knowledge, as far as a uh community council or this group has had a response from them since October.

They have not been in any of the meetings since October.

Um I think the EA coming out as in the manner that it did right before Christmas with a very short response time to it.

Um the fact that Marnell Amy finally had the meeting with Debbie, and they said they're not gonna follow municipal code, they're not sure what state laws they're gonna follow.