This meeting of the Anchorage Community and Economic Development Committee (CEDC) was called to order at 9:02 AM on September 4, 2026 (though the transcript references September 3rd). The committee heard a director’s report, a report from the Anchorage Community Development Authority (ACDA), a presentation on the third-party plan review audit, and a presentation from Greater Anchorage Inc. (Fur Rondy). No public testimony was given. No formal votes were taken, but several recommendations were discussed.
Note: The transcript indicates the meeting was called to order on Thursday, September 3rd, 2026 at 9:02 AM, but the provided metadata specifies the meeting date as 2026-09-04 17:31:41+00:00. This summary uses the specified date per instructions.
Good morning everyone. We'll call this meeting of the community and economic development committee to order Thursday, September 3rd, 9 02 AM. In the room, we'll do begin with introductions and then we'll move to the phone. There are some members on the line in the room currently, myself, George Martinez. On the line, we have Member Brawley. Yep, I'm here. Thank you, Chair. We also have Member Baldwin Day. Yes, good morning. Thank you, Member Day. And if there are any other members hidden online, identify yourselves. I don't see you, and we'll continue to move forward from that. Thank you. And we'll begin with our regular reports. I see Mr. Dole is here, and I'll turn it over to you, sir. Good morning. Bob Dole, Director of Community Economic Development. I sent out my notes late. Hopefully, it got to the people online. There are paper copies available for those here today. For those coming in in and out on the Glen, you may notice the big timber is no longer there. Sign of progress and hopefully freeing up some time for first responders to do meet other aids of the community in a hopefully safer environment. We have various demolition projects that are in the process going forward. With uh age order in hand, um, a land use enforcement had a contract to clean up 1306 Chugatch Way where the debris pile there was kind of languishing going forward. Smart code towards the new permit system, the permit types have been built out in the test environment. We have staff testing them now to see if they function correctly. Probably the next step after that will be inviting some of our frequent filers to also participate in that testing, make sure they're performing as expected. I think the most exciting thing I see in the new system going forward that during plan review, when a comment is made, that can be addressed at that point. Right now, under our existing software, when a comment is made, kind of all the disciplines bundle their comments, and the whole thing is lobbed back to the applicant for all of their different uh specialized engineers to bundle all their comments back to the first comments or resolve them. So there's no simultaneous communication, it's just as volley there as volley back, kind of like volleyball, except each time open the net takes two or three weeks. So we're excited that that progress going forward. Uh the development services is preparing a policy to address the uh state has started uh allowing temporary licensure of those in the trades coming up here, uh there's no licenses, and we need to update so we can also license them in municipality or plumbers, mechanics, carpenters, electricians, uh those types coming up. Um interest continues in options for uh modular housing, and another manufacturer has reached out to us. And this one's kind of exciting to me anyway, because their uh their product lays flat so that it really reduces the some of the shipping cost as opposed to one that is already built up. Also, they envision a do-it-yourself version, so it should be friendlier for somebody who wants to do that. But that's under exploration with uh them. Do I need to stop so you make an announcement? All right, I would interrupt you. Okay, proceeding along then. Um we are um looking at just uh a comment came out as the housing work session about uh concerns when a pro when a inspector finds a deficiency in design during the construction phase because everything has to get to a stop, and that's re-engineered. Right now, there's a notification system to those um to the designer, the reviewer of the designer, and the builder as to why things stop. Um, based on those comments, we don't think it's sinking in or it's understood why we stopped for this life safety thing. The process will continue just with a stronger blunter explanation of why this has to be addressed now. And um, but we th we have been notifying along the way. Apparently, it has to be sinking in. Also, the question is uh just a serious issue came up recently that is under consideration. How do we address when something is found? Something that is not normally part of the inspection but's found not to meet the level of trade and creates a serious problem later on. What role if any should develop that services be looking at at building safety in that regard?