OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Anchorage, Alaska/Assembly & Committee Meetings
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Municipal Audit Committee Meeting Summary – October 27, 2026

Assembly & Committee Meetings — Tuesday, October 27, 2026
BodyAnchorage, Alaska
SessionAssembly & Committee Meetings
DateTuesday, October 27, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:02:56

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

Hello everybody.

0:02

Welcome to the Municipal Audit Committee meeting.

0:04

Today is October 21st.

Unassigned speaker

0:06

We're not us from 1 to 2 p.m.

Speaker 1

0:08

It is 105.

0:10

Let's begin with member introductions.

0:15

Assuming so in Roman.

0:20

Aaron Bell McGay.

0:21

Bill

Speaker 2

0:22

Falsey.

Unassigned speaker

0:25

We are

Speaker 1

0:25

also joined

Unassigned speaker

0:26

in room by uh second.

Unassigned speaker

0:29

Stephanie Ryan controller.

Unassigned speaker

0:31

And we also have Director Rash and DRC Woncalvo

Speaker 1

0:35

from the Health Department.

0:37

Our first item of new business is a review of the C BG Community Development Grant audit, internal audit, and I believe there is a presentation to progress.

Speaker 3

0:51

Thank you.

0:51

Kimberly Rash Anchorage Health Department.

0:53

And with me I have Dorothy Montalba, who's a human services division manager.

0:57

In anticipation of today's presentation to the audit committee, we created 27 slides in case Member Baldwin Day has any questions for us.

1:07

That never happened, but we have created a plethora of information and resources.

1:14

One of the things I want to first off say is that the Anchorage Health Department always puts forth a request to internal audit for various programs.

1:25

And this was a holdover from the previous year that we brought forward to this year a request to audit this specific grant out of community safety and development.

1:38

And the reason why I brought it forth was because it had not been audited in some time.

1:44

Staff have changed over, and the HUD rules have changed continuously.

1:49

And so understanding that we're not the best set all the time.

1:54

And so I'm here to go over some of the findings and knowing that this was a learning opportunity for all of us.

2:02

So today I'm going to summarize the audit results, focus on control management that we're that we have put in place and that we are putting in place to address the findings.

2:13

My intent isn't to go over every single detail, but at least high level, and then the there is an appendix after slide 17 that goes over each of the actual findings for reference.

2:26

So introductions.

2:28

Alright, so CDBG is also called Community Development Block Branch.

2:33

We are a HUD entitlement community.

2:36

We receive federal funds from HUD themselves directly to the municipality of Anchorage.

2:42

CDBG is only a portion of our funding that we get from HUD.

2:46

The other two buckets of funding we receive is home and ESG.

2:50

ESG stands for emergency solutions grant, and that grant is run through our EDRC, which is our aging and disability resource center.

2:59

This is a federal program administered by the U.S.

3:01

Department of Housing and Urban Development.

3:05

This creates the opportunity and the responsibility for the local health department to abide by not only the federal program rules and regulations but also the municipality of Anchorage Anchorage Municipal Code.

3:20

And so really what we are here to do is support the activities that are that can develop a viable community.

4:11

Dr.

4:11

Rashid, we have a question from Dr.

4:14

Rollin.

4:14

Okay.

4:14

Yeah, sorry,

Speaker 4

4:15

just

Speaker 3

4:15

a

Speaker 4

4:15

very brief clarifying question on the prior slide.

4:18

Because I think what you said, I just want to understand what you said, which is the internal audit has not looked at this program of the study for a while, but um can you I mean I know these are very heavily regulated funds, so can you just very briefly describe some of the controls that are in place?

4:34

You know, you mentioned audits of our various plans.

4:37

I know that's a whole other discussion about various plans.

4:39

Um but is that annual, you know, as a what kind of paperwork are we submitting it, but I just want to be super clear and not create any impression that these have not been looked at by anybody because that's correct.

Speaker 3

4:48

Yes, that is uh that is very accurate statement.

4:51

Uh HUD reviews all of our documentation on annual basis.

4:55

Uh we have to submit our annual action plan every single year.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

HUD has to approve it and make sure that it buys by the federal regulations.

Speaker 3

5:03

Every five years, we are required to submit to them a consolidated plan, and all of these plans have to be approved before they come to the body.

5:11

Um, and so it has to meet every single uh criteria that they have on the federal side to meet those requirements.

5:17

In addition, we do have to submit our CAPER report, which looks over our performance for the past year.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Audit Committee█████████████████████████████████████████████58%
Board And Commission Management████████████15%
Grant Management██████8%
Public Works████5%
Auditing████5%
Procedural███4%
Community Development██2%
Public Engagement██2%
Community Engagement█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Municipal Audit Committee Meeting Summary – October 27, 2026

The Municipal Audit Committee convened on October 27, 2026 at 1:05 PM. The meeting focused on the presentation of an internal audit of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program and a preliminary discussion on reforming the sunset review process for boards and commissions. One member of the public provided testimony regarding an advisory board experience.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • A public commenter shared an experience with the Homelessness Lived Experience Advisory Board, which he said was abruptly disbanded after only a few months. He characterized it as a “political vehicle” and criticized the lack of shared power in advisory bodies.

Discussion Items

  • CDBG Internal Audit Presentation: Dr. Kimberly Rash (Anchorage Health Department) presented a 27-slide review of the CDBG internal audit, which had not been performed in several years. The audit identified nine findings grouped into four themes: performance oversight, grant agreement/contract management, reporting and public participation, and documentation controls. Key issues included: lack of consistent tracking of goals and deliverables, expired agreements not amended in a timely manner, missing public hearing documentation for the 2024 annual action plan, and incomplete files for subrecipient agreements. Corrective actions already implemented include: use of Microsoft Planner for project tracking, standardized solicitation and agreement templates, pre-execution compliance checklists, and a formal monitoring escalation process (including notices to cure). Dr. Rash noted that 25 mobile home repairs had been completed against a goal of 40, and that 95 of 101 monthly subrecipient reports had non-compliance issues. Committee members asked detailed follow-up questions about enforcement actions, procurement compliance status (three or four grantees still out of compliance), and the status of individual corrective actions.
  • Pre-Sunset Reporting Requirements for Boards and Commissions (AL2026-132): Member Scout presented a proposal to change the approach to sunset audits, which currently require about 40–50 hours per audit from the internal audit team. Internal Auditor Alden Thurm expressed support, noting that annual self‑reports from commissions could provide more timely information than the current three-year retrospective audits. Suggestions were made to adjust language to reflect that most boards use meeting recordings rather than minutes, and to consider the role of the Mayor’s Office in managing boards. The item is scheduled for a future agenda with opportunity for co-sponsorship.

Key Outcomes

  • The committee received and discussed the CDBG audit results. The Health Department confirmed that all corrective actions from the audit have been implemented, including new tracking tools, compliance checklists, and enforcement procedures. Follow-up on specific grantee compliance is ongoing, with a target of January 1, 2027 for full compliance.
  • The proposal to revise sunset reporting requirements was socialized; it will appear on a future agenda for formal consideration. Member Scout welcomed co-sponsors.
  • The meeting adjourned at 2:07 PM.

Meeting Transcript

Hello everybody. Welcome to the Municipal Audit Committee meeting. Today is October 21st. We're not us from 1 to 2 p.m. It is 105. Let's begin with member introductions. Assuming so in Roman. Aaron Bell McGay. Bill Falsey. We are also joined in room by uh second. Stephanie Ryan controller. And we also have Director Rash and DRC Woncalvo from the Health Department. Our first item of new business is a review of the C BG Community Development Grant audit, internal audit, and I believe there is a presentation to progress. Thank you. Kimberly Rash Anchorage Health Department. And with me I have Dorothy Montalba, who's a human services division manager. In anticipation of today's presentation to the audit committee, we created 27 slides in case Member Baldwin Day has any questions for us. That never happened, but we have created a plethora of information and resources. One of the things I want to first off say is that the Anchorage Health Department always puts forth a request to internal audit for various programs. And this was a holdover from the previous year that we brought forward to this year a request to audit this specific grant out of community safety and development. And the reason why I brought it forth was because it had not been audited in some time. Staff have changed over, and the HUD rules have changed continuously. And so understanding that we're not the best set all the time. And so I'm here to go over some of the findings and knowing that this was a learning opportunity for all of us. So today I'm going to summarize the audit results, focus on control management that we're that we have put in place and that we are putting in place to address the findings. My intent isn't to go over every single detail, but at least high level, and then the there is an appendix after slide 17 that goes over each of the actual findings for reference. So introductions. Alright, so CDBG is also called Community Development Block Branch. We are a HUD entitlement community. We receive federal funds from HUD themselves directly to the municipality of Anchorage. CDBG is only a portion of our funding that we get from HUD. The other two buckets of funding we receive is home and ESG. ESG stands for emergency solutions grant, and that grant is run through our EDRC, which is our aging and disability resource center. This is a federal program administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. This creates the opportunity and the responsibility for the local health department to abide by not only the federal program rules and regulations but also the municipality of Anchorage Anchorage Municipal Code. And so really what we are here to do is support the activities that are that can develop a viable community. Dr. Rashid, we have a question from Dr. Rollin. Okay. Yeah, sorry, just a very brief clarifying question on the prior slide. Because I think what you said, I just want to understand what you said, which is the internal audit has not looked at this program of the study for a while, but um can you I mean I know these are very heavily regulated funds, so can you just very briefly describe some of the controls that are in place?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com