OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Annapolis, Maryland/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Annapolis Rules Committee Meeting - October 1, 2026

City Council — Thursday, October 1, 2026
BodyAnnapolis, Maryland
SessionCity Council
DateThursday, October 1, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:13:04

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

7 p.m.

Unassigned speaker

0:01

Um

Speaker 1

0:01

we're gonna start with a roll call, Alderman Brook Shandemeyer

Speaker 2

0:05

President.

Speaker 1

0:05

All right, Aldman Frank Thorpe.

Speaker 2

0:07

Here

Unassigned speaker

0:07

all

Speaker 1

0:07

right, and Alderman Smith Brown chair is also present.

0:10

Uh let's get a motion to approve the agenda.

Speaker 2

0:12

Mr.

0:12

Chair, I'd like to make an amendment in the order of the agenda.

0:15

I would like to move 021 26 up to the top of uh legislative action.

Speaker 1

0:24

Okay, is there a second?

Speaker 3

0:26

Second.

Speaker 1

0:26

All right, all in favor.

0:28

Aye.

0:30

Thank you.

Unassigned speaker

0:30

Um

Speaker 1

0:31

moving forward, we have the approval of the minutes.

0:34

Is there a motion to approve the minutes from our meeting on September 3rd, 2026?

0:39

So

Speaker 4

0:39

moved.

Speaker 1

0:39

All right, second for that.

Speaker 4

0:40

Second.

Speaker 1

0:41

There's no objection, we'll move forward with

Unassigned speaker

0:43

that.

Speaker 1

0:44

Okay.

0:44

Um our first legislation piece today.

0:47

Thank you very much, Matthew Fleming.

0:49

If you don't mind joining us from the resilience authority of Annapolis and Anarona County.

0:58

So for the record, if you don't mind, uh

Unassigned speaker

1:01

presenting.

Speaker 4

1:04

Sure, uh Matt Fleming, director of the resilience authority of Annapolis and Amarona County.

Speaker 1

1:08

All right.

1:08

Um now we have a piece of legislation before us today, O 2126, which is for the purpose of revising certain requirements for membership of the resilience authority of Annapolis and Enerona County, revising the process for appointment of the resilience authority director and generally relating to boards, commissions, and similar bodies.

1:24

Do you mind giving us an overview of this legislation?

1:27

Yeah,

Speaker 4

1:27

yeah.

Speaker 1

1:27

I can do uh I'll I'll go

Speaker 4

1:28

back and do a little beef brief background as uh you guys know a lot about the resilience story, but I don't want to spend too much time.

1:36

But yeah, we were uh in context, we were established by the city and the county in 2021, following an enabling legislation uh passed by the state general assembly.

1:46

We are created as a joint city county entity develop, finance, and implement infrastructure projects to make the Anoron County and the city uh more resilient to the impacts of a changing uh environment.

1:57

Um what is unique, I think, uh about this structure is that we're not simply an advisory body.

2:04

Uh the authorities intend to provide additional implementation capacity for the city and the county to help develop projects, secure outside funding, manage complex uh infrastructure projects and and and um ultimately get projects built.

2:17

Um I think the same is true of our board.

2:20

Um we've been incredibly fortunate with the people who have been uh who have agreed to serve.

2:25

They do they do more than just attend corle meetings and vote on authority business.

2:29

Um they've been extended uh essentially an extension of our capacity to serve the city and the county.

2:34

Um we've had board members that help write grants, review projects, um, you know, they brought energy modernization funding to the county or to the city, so they truly are kind of vested in this.

2:46

Um and just as a side note, we toured um City Doc with Burr and the mayor uh last night, and uh you know, we had our meeting afterwards, and you can see how engaged they were to try and uh you know to figure out where the ways they can help the city out with that project.

3:00

So um so about the the bill.

3:03

Um so as the the authority is a uh is uh matured, um you know the work has become uh more complex.

3:11

Uh we're we secured more than 80 million dollars uh of funding for city and county projects, you know, and the questions you know uh that that we deal with involve infrastructure finance, energy, project delivery, insurance and risk, philanthropy, public and private investment, debt uh financing, and other specialized areas.

3:30

Um the the conversation at the board and the reason for this legislation and the legislation went to the county was should we evaluate this governing framework that provide a limited amount of flexibility in the future to recruit individuals with specific expertise that might be that might not be readily available locally.

3:49

Um this uh concept was also informed by conversations we had with Montgomery County Green Bank, uh similar entity out in Montgomery County, as well as uh the Connecticut Green Bank models where they're able to pull people from outside their region.

4:04

Um I want to emphasize that there is not a driver for a particular particular individual or desire to move away from local representation.

4:14

It was you know, we have an extraordinary uh depth in Anna Rona County in Annapolis.

4:19

It was just that if in the future, if the the thought that we would need um some sort of expertise to allow that flexibility.

4:25

Um the uh and I think what uh kind of going back to the the county legislative process that was passed this spring.

4:34

Uh we actually um

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural████████████████████████24%
Elections██████████████████18%
Intergovernmental Relations████████████████16%
Environmental Protection███████████████15%
Affordable Housing██████████10%
Racial Equity████4%
Historic Preservation████4%
Community Engagement███3%
Public Safety███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Annapolis Rules and City Government Committee Meeting - October 1, 2026

The Rules and City Government Committee met on Thursday, October 1, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. in City Council Chambers. The committee considered four legislative items: expanding the Board of Supervisors of Elections, amending the Resilience Authority membership and appointment process, updating the City Charter preamble, and legalizing long-term room rentals. Several amendments were debated and voted upon.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved agenda as amended (O-21-26 moved to top of legislative action).
  • Approved minutes from September 3, 2026.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No formal public testimony was taken, but during discussion of O-11-26 (room rentals), the committee noted concerns from a resident about inspections and privacy, which were addressed by a simplified amendment.

Discussion Items

  • O-21-26: Resilience Authority Membership and Director Appointment

    • Matt Fleming, Resilience Authority Director, presented the legislation to revise membership requirements and the director appointment process, allowing up to two non-local members for specialized expertise. He noted the Authority has secured over $80 million for city and county projects.
    • Two amendments were introduced by Alderman Savidge: Amendment 2 restored a city residency requirement for board members; Amendment 1 required city council confirmation of mayor's appointees.
    • Amendment 2 passed unanimously. Amendment 1 prompted legal concerns about consistency with county code and potential conflict. The committee voted to give a favorable recommendation to Amendment 1 pending law office review and coordination with the county.
    • The committee then gave a favorable recommendation to O-21-26 as amended.
  • CA-2-26: Expanding Board of Supervisors of Elections from 3 to 5 Members

    • Liam, Board of Supervisors of Elections Chair, explained the need for expansion: quorum challenges with a three-member board and lack of unaffiliated voter representation. The 2020 Charter Review Commission had recommended this change.
    • Alderman Savidge proposed an amendment based on voter registration (50% Democrat, 25% Republican, 25% unaffiliated at the time of drafting). Alderman Smith-Brown offered a competing amendment giving the mayor appointment authority with council confirmation, opening nominations to self-recommendations and central committee recommendations, and setting a 3% threshold for third parties.
    • After debate, the Smith-Brown amendment was amended to raise the third-party threshold from 3% to 10%, and passed 2-1 (Alderman Schandelmeier dissenting, preferring the clean bill). The committee then voted 3-0 to give a favorable recommendation to CA-2-26 as amended.
  • CA-3-26: Expanding the Preamble of the City Charter

    • Alderman Savidge presented the legislation, based on the 2021 Charter Review Commission report, adding statements on diversity, equity, inclusion, environmental stewardship, climate change, and other values.
    • Alderman Thorpe offered an amendment simplifying the preamble, removing operational language and focusing on strategic identity. The committee discussed language regarding the "three pillars of Annapolis" (historic, maritime, universities).
    • After debate, the committee adopted the Thorpe amendment as modified, striking the three-pillars phrase and instead beginning with "The foundation of the city of Annapolis is its residents." The amendment passed unanimously, and CA-3-26 as amended received a favorable recommendation.
  • O-11-26: Allowing Long-Term Room Rentals in Private Homes ("Bedrooms for People Act")

    • Alderman Schandelmeier, the sponsor, explained that the legislation legalizes renting single rooms in owner-occupied homes for 90 days or more. He offered Amendment 2, which simplified the original bill to just declare such rentals legal, based on Planning Commission recommendations.
    • Alexis Robinson, Senior Comprehensive Planner, noted the department's support for a simplified approach, with no new land use definitions and clarifying that locked doors must not inhibit emergency egress.
    • Discussion addressed inspections, enforcement, and the current $1,000 per day fine for illegal room rental, which disproportionately targets minorities. The committee agreed inspections were not necessary for informal arrangements.
    • Amendment 2 passed unanimously. The committee then gave a favorable recommendation to O-11-26 as amended.

Key Outcomes

  • O-21-26: Gave favorable recommendation as amended (residency requirement + pending law office review on council confirmation).
  • CA-2-26: Gave favorable recommendation 3-0 to legislation as amended (mayor appoints, council confirms; 10% third-party threshold; expanded nomination pool).
  • CA-3-26: Gave favorable recommendation unanimously to legislation as amended (simplified preamble focusing on residents, equity, environment).
  • O-11-26: Gave favorable recommendation unanimously to legislation as amended (legalizes long-term room rentals in owner-occupied homes without rental license requirement for informal arrangements).
  • All items will proceed to the full City Council for final action.

Meeting Transcript

7 p.m. Um we're gonna start with a roll call, Alderman Brook Shandemeyer President. All right, Aldman Frank Thorpe. Here all right, and Alderman Smith Brown chair is also present. Uh let's get a motion to approve the agenda. Mr. Chair, I'd like to make an amendment in the order of the agenda. I would like to move 021 26 up to the top of uh legislative action. Okay, is there a second? Second. All right, all in favor. Aye. Thank you. Um moving forward, we have the approval of the minutes. Is there a motion to approve the minutes from our meeting on September 3rd, 2026? So moved. All right, second for that. Second. There's no objection, we'll move forward with that. Okay. Um our first legislation piece today. Thank you very much, Matthew Fleming. If you don't mind joining us from the resilience authority of Annapolis and Anarona County. So for the record, if you don't mind, uh presenting. Sure, uh Matt Fleming, director of the resilience authority of Annapolis and Amarona County. All right. Um now we have a piece of legislation before us today, O 2126, which is for the purpose of revising certain requirements for membership of the resilience authority of Annapolis and Enerona County, revising the process for appointment of the resilience authority director and generally relating to boards, commissions, and similar bodies. Do you mind giving us an overview of this legislation? Yeah, yeah. I can do uh I'll I'll go back and do a little beef brief background as uh you guys know a lot about the resilience story, but I don't want to spend too much time. But yeah, we were uh in context, we were established by the city and the county in 2021, following an enabling legislation uh passed by the state general assembly. We are created as a joint city county entity develop, finance, and implement infrastructure projects to make the Anoron County and the city uh more resilient to the impacts of a changing uh environment. Um what is unique, I think, uh about this structure is that we're not simply an advisory body. Uh the authorities intend to provide additional implementation capacity for the city and the county to help develop projects, secure outside funding, manage complex uh infrastructure projects and and and um ultimately get projects built. Um I think the same is true of our board. Um we've been incredibly fortunate with the people who have been uh who have agreed to serve. They do they do more than just attend corle meetings and vote on authority business. Um they've been extended uh essentially an extension of our capacity to serve the city and the county. Um we've had board members that help write grants, review projects, um, you know, they brought energy modernization funding to the county or to the city, so they truly are kind of vested in this. Um and just as a side note, we toured um City Doc with Burr and the mayor uh last night, and uh you know, we had our meeting afterwards, and you can see how engaged they were to try and uh you know to figure out where the ways they can help the city out with that project.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com