OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Anne Arundel County, Maryland/County Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Anne Arundel County Council Reviews FY2027 Budgets for Multiple Departments on May 13, 2026

County Council — Wednesday, May 13, 2026
BodyAnne Arundel County, Maryland
SessionCounty Council
DateWednesday, May 13, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:57:23

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

9:35

The May thirteenth, twenty twenty six meeting of the Anne Random County Council is called to order.

9:40

Please ensure all electronic devices are in silent mode.

9:43

Today we will continue with department budget presentations, and we will begin our presentations with the circuit court.

Speaker 2

10:09

Good afternoon.

10:10

I'm Kyle Madden from the budget office.

10:13

You can find the circuit court's budget on page 320 of the budget book.

10:18

And I will turn it over to Circuit Court to talk about their budget.

Unassigned speaker

10:22

All

Speaker 3

10:22

right, good afternoon.

10:24

Thank you for this opportunity to speak on behalf of the Circuit Court for Anna Rundel County.

10:28

I'm Judge Donna Schaefer, administrative judge for the court.

10:32

With me are Doug Hofstedt, our court administrator, and Kim Klein, our director of court operations.

10:39

We are now in our 13th year as an electronic courthouse utilizing the Maryland Judiciary's electronic case management system, MDEC, which has been implemented in all Maryland courts now.

10:50

What was once a new system has been used in Anamondo County longer than any of our current judges have been on the bench.

10:57

The judiciary recently rolled out a major update to the system, and we are pleased to report that it went smoothly.

11:04

Each year, all courts in Maryland undergo an assessment of how long it takes each court to process cases in all case types.

Unassigned speaker

11:14

The

Speaker 3

11:14

case time standard for civil non-family law cases is that they be resolved within 18 months.

11:25

In the latest assessment.

11:27

The case time standard for family law cases is to resolve these cases within one year.

11:32

According to the latest assessment, our court achieved this goal 92.7% of the time.

11:39

For criminal cases, the case time standard is to conclude them within 180 days.

Unassigned speaker

11:52

The

Speaker 3

11:52

case time standard for juvenile cases is to have them resolved within 90 days.

11:58

Last year, our court achieved this 98.2% of the time.

12:03

Court and judicial security have been at the top of our priority list.

Unassigned speaker

12:08

The

Speaker 3

12:08

court has conducted two security assessments, one by the Maryland Judiciary, and the second by the Homeland Security Branch of the Ana Rondo County Police Department.

12:18

Combined, those assessments yielded more than 60 recommended items for security enhancement, some small and some large.

12:25

We have already addressed several items on the list and will continue to do so.

12:29

Along these same lines, we have worked to create a much improved judicial threat reporting protocol.

12:35

Our judges and staff have worked closely with the Sheriff's Office, the Ana Rundle County Police,

Unassigned speaker

12:41

the

Speaker 3

12:41

Maryland State Police, the Annapolis City Police to establish a new system for reporting threats.

12:47

The new system immediately emails all law enforcement and court leadership when a threat is reported and triggers an immediate threat assessment.

12:56

We have worked closely with the budget office to submit a conservative budget request for fiscal year 2027 within the confines of the budget projection.

13:06

Our overall budget submission includes multiple grant business units for which we receive state funding for programs such as our drug court, family services, and alternative dispute resolution programs.

13:18

Through judiciary funding, our court employs two full-time Spanish interpreters and enlists contract interpreters for all other languages.

13:26

At this point, we're happy to answer any questions that you may have.

Unassigned speaker

13:33

Mr.

Speaker 4

13:33

Folkey.

13:34

Thanks, Madam Chair.

13:35

My cases are in the 7-whatever percent that don't get done in the case time standard.

13:39

So I know that.

13:40

Not that it's your fault.

13:41

So I was gonna

Speaker 1

13:42

say

Speaker 4

13:42

that may reflect

Speaker 1

13:42

on you,

Speaker 4

13:43

Mr.

13:43

Fulk.

13:45

The judge can share.

13:47

The judge can share many thoughts on that.

13:50

Yeah.

13:50

Um I agree.

13:51

Very modest request.

13:53

It looks like a 2% overall bump.

13:55

Um, I did want to ask about what looks like the positions on the general fund.

14:04

Um it's are we just sort of moving people around?

14:07

Is that what's going on there?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Affordable Housing████████████████████20%
Budget Equity Analysis█████████████13%
Economic Development█████████████13%
Workforce Development██████████10%
Homelessness██████████10%
Technology and Innovation██████6%
Public Safety██████6%
Community Engagement██████6%
Personnel Matters█████5%
Summary of Proceedings

Anne Arundel County Council Reviews FY2027 Budgets for Multiple Departments on May 13, 2026

The Anne Arundel County Council met on May 13, 2026, to continue department budget presentations for Fiscal Year 2027. Presentations were heard from the Circuit Court, Department of Social Services, Orphan's Court, Board of License Commissioners, Arundel Community Development Services, Anne Arundel Workforce Development Corporation, Anne Arundel Economic Development Corporation, and the Partnership for Children, Youth and Families. Councilmembers asked questions on security, staffing, caseloads, and program impacts. No formal votes were taken; the meeting recessed until a 7:00 p.m. public hearing.

Discussion Items

Circuit Court

  • Judge Donna Schaefer, Administrative Judge, reported that the court is in its 13th year of electronic case management (MDEC) with a smooth major update. Case time standards: civil non-family cases (resolved within 18 months) met 92.7% of the time; criminal cases (180 days) and juvenile cases (90 days) met 98.2% of the time. Security remains a priority: over 60 recommendations from two assessments, with a new multi-agency threat reporting protocol. The FY2027 budget is a 2% increase, with one new position (drug court) converted from contractual to merit. Councilmember Fulk asked about using non-sworn personnel for courtroom security; Judge Schaefer noted the court supports any security improvements but that decisions rest with the Sheriff.

Department of Social Services

  • Director Rachel (full name not provided) presented. The department’s budget accounts for less than 1% of county spending but delivers over $15 million in economic benefits. Key metrics: kin foster placements rose to 38% (goal of 48%); in-home services kept 97% of children safely at home; FIA caseload of 799:1 (second highest in state); 376 job placements at average $20/hour; 48,000 children received summer meals; 35,000 new applications for economic assistance in FY25. Requests include conversion of three community program positions to merit and $120,000 in county funds to support informal kin families (in partnership with Partnership for Children, Youth and Families). Councilmember Ravi noted the high caseload and praised the department’s work.

Orphan's Court

  • Judge Gibson (full name not provided) reported that the court has eliminated a prior backlog and implemented virtual/hybrid hearings. The budget request is decreased from last year because prior funds for a courtroom overhaul were used. A COLA for positions is needed (not funded); a safety issue in a hallway behind judicial chambers (20-foot drop) has not been addressed by facilities. Councilmember Smith thanked the judge for her service; this was her final budget.

Board of License Commissioners (Liquor Board)

  • Edward Aronson, Janet Gagnan, and Chairman Wayne Harris presented. The board is fully funded by license fees, which have not increased in 16 years. They consistently return a surplus to the general fund. FY2027 request includes modest increases for legislative compliance (new state law adds two commissioners, total of five) and long-overdue salary adjustments for inspectors (some unchanged since 2007). A new licensee portal and orientation have been launched. Councilmember Fulk noted salaries are set by state law and asked for a follow-up email on current vs. proposed salaries.

Arundel Community Development Services (ACDS)

  • Anne (full name not provided) presented. The Affordable Housing Trust Fund receives roughly $10 million annually; 75% supports capital projects for affordable rental/ownership, 20% for operating programs and tenant-based rental assistance. In the last year, 10 rental projects closed; 19 projects in pipeline requesting $34 million for 1,900 affordable units. Down payment assistance and the Moving Home program (tenant exiting homelessness) have high success rates. Approximately 500 evictions prevented in the last 1.5 years. The Community Reinvestment Repair Fund increased from $852,000 in FY26 to $3.6 million in FY27 due to accumulated cannabis licensing fees. Councilmember Fulk inquired about a fire department request for Life Pack 35s through video lottery terminal (VLT) funds; ACDS explained that VLT funds are restricted to projects within a three-mile radius of the casino, and the fire department request was countywide, so it was not funded. Councilmember Smith urged that VLT funds not supplant county operational responsibilities.

Anne Arundel Workforce Development Corporation

  • Kirkland Murray, President/CEO, reported that the corporation focuses on jobs, business pipeline, and future workforce. Key stats: 15,295 middle school and 12,800 high school students served in marking period three; 277 business events; 360 applications for only 89 summer intern slots; 150 re-entry residents received services; 29 entered occupational training. The FY27 budget request is $725,000 (personnel $413k, fringe $119k, participants $48k, etc.). Murray thanked the council for additional SNAP funding. No questions from council.

Anne Arundel Economic Development Corporation (AAEDC)

  • Amy Gowan, President/CEO, presented. The agency launched its first strategic plan in 2025, updated mission to include revitalization. FY27 request is $2.89 million base plus $112,000 for COLA and CPI adjustment. New initiatives: attendance at Select USA and RSA cybersecurity conference; a new website with resource hub and site selection tool; the first RUNDOWNZ expo (300+ attendees); phase two feasibility study for a regional agricultural meat processing facility (requested $30,000 increase); and a new financial coaching program. In Glen Burnie, a $100,000 county investment leveraged $900,000 in outside investment. The Enough Act initiative in Brooklyn Park has achieved an 8% reduction in poverty; the agency is leading implementation of 81 actions from the General Development Plan and region plans. Councilmember Fiedler praised the agency's work in District 2, noting a potential $4 million federal earmark for the town center.

Partnership for Children, Youth and Families

  • Pam Brown, President/CEO, celebrated the agency’s 30th anniversary. It has 48 employees and uses a collective impact model. Key initiatives: the Enough Act in Brooklyn Park (official) and three unofficial Enough zones in Maryland City/Laurel, Annapolis, and South County; a pilot Flourishing Families program (funded by O’Neill Foundation) to move homeless families to wealth building. Data: 8% poverty reduction in Brooklyn Park; served almost 300 families in FY25; project 500+ more families needing services in FY26-27. FY27 requests funded in the county executive’s proposed budget: $520,000 for administrative positions (scaffolding), additional $500,000 for the food bank (total $2 million pass-through), and $152,000 for the HOP program (unaccompanied homeless youth). Requests not funded: additional $1 million for client assistance in housing trust fund (they negotiated down), and $120,000 for a 3% deferred compensation match for staff (all contractual employees). Brown expressed concern that many long-serving staff cannot retire and asked the next administration to consider retirement benefits. Councilmember Ravi and Slutsky asked clarifying questions about unfunded items and deferred compensation structure.

Key Outcomes

  • No formal votes were taken on the individual budgets or any resolutions during this session. The presentations were informational, with councilmembers asking questions and offering comments.
  • The meeting concluded with a motion by Councilmember Smith to recess until the 7:00 p.m. public hearing, which was seconded and carried unanimously.
  • Several councilmembers expressed appreciation for the work of each department and noted the tight fiscal environment for FY2027.

Meeting Transcript

The May thirteenth, twenty twenty six meeting of the Anne Random County Council is called to order. Please ensure all electronic devices are in silent mode. Today we will continue with department budget presentations, and we will begin our presentations with the circuit court. Good afternoon. I'm Kyle Madden from the budget office. You can find the circuit court's budget on page 320 of the budget book. And I will turn it over to Circuit Court to talk about their budget. All right, good afternoon. Thank you for this opportunity to speak on behalf of the Circuit Court for Anna Rundel County. I'm Judge Donna Schaefer, administrative judge for the court. With me are Doug Hofstedt, our court administrator, and Kim Klein, our director of court operations. We are now in our 13th year as an electronic courthouse utilizing the Maryland Judiciary's electronic case management system, MDEC, which has been implemented in all Maryland courts now. What was once a new system has been used in Anamondo County longer than any of our current judges have been on the bench. The judiciary recently rolled out a major update to the system, and we are pleased to report that it went smoothly. Each year, all courts in Maryland undergo an assessment of how long it takes each court to process cases in all case types. The case time standard for civil non-family law cases is that they be resolved within 18 months. In the latest assessment. The case time standard for family law cases is to resolve these cases within one year. According to the latest assessment, our court achieved this goal 92.7% of the time. For criminal cases, the case time standard is to conclude them within 180 days. The case time standard for juvenile cases is to have them resolved within 90 days. Last year, our court achieved this 98.2% of the time. Court and judicial security have been at the top of our priority list. The court has conducted two security assessments, one by the Maryland Judiciary, and the second by the Homeland Security Branch of the Ana Rondo County Police Department. Combined, those assessments yielded more than 60 recommended items for security enhancement, some small and some large. We have already addressed several items on the list and will continue to do so. Along these same lines, we have worked to create a much improved judicial threat reporting protocol. Our judges and staff have worked closely with the Sheriff's Office, the Ana Rundle County Police, the Maryland State Police, the Annapolis City Police to establish a new system for reporting threats. The new system immediately emails all law enforcement and court leadership when a threat is reported and triggers an immediate threat assessment. We have worked closely with the budget office to submit a conservative budget request for fiscal year 2027 within the confines of the budget projection. Our overall budget submission includes multiple grant business units for which we receive state funding for programs such as our drug court, family services, and alternative dispute resolution programs. Through judiciary funding, our court employs two full-time Spanish interpreters and enlists contract interpreters for all other languages. At this point, we're happy to answer any questions that you may have. Mr. Folkey. Thanks, Madam Chair. My cases are in the 7-whatever percent that don't get done in the case time standard. So I know that. Not that it's your fault. So I was gonna say that may reflect on you, Mr.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com