OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Anne Arundel County, Maryland/County Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Anne Arundel County Council Work Session and Board of Health Meeting - October 13, 2026

County Council — Tuesday, October 13, 2026
BodyAnne Arundel County, Maryland
SessionCounty Council
DateTuesday, October 13, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:52:56

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

8:57

The October thirteenth, twenty twenty-six work session of the Anne Randall Cabin Council is called to order.

9:02

This is our last work session of this session.

9:07

Please ensure all electronic devices are in silent mode.

9:10

Do any of my colleagues have any questions before we begin?

9:13

Okay.

Unassigned speaker

9:37

I'm

Speaker 2

9:37

Chris Trumbauer, budget officer.

9:39

I'm joined by Brian Sheng

Speaker 3

9:40

from Finance and Lori Blair

Speaker 2

9:42

from Office of Law.

9:43

This is a transfer bill.

9:45

It does three things.

10:02

So it didn't affect where the funding went and it didn't really affect the budget, but this is correcting it so that it's a um a correct uh record of what actually happened.

10:12

Um so those changes are incorporated in this bill, and then there are two actual money transfers.

10:18

Um one is backfilling money for the state grant that went to the city of Annapolis for the 250 celebration.

10:26

The county is just a pass through entity for that.

10:29

Um, but we had to do the accounting, and that's what this uh bill does.

10:32

And then the second one backfills funding that we did for the Empire Towers uh small business grants, and that comes from the CAO fund.

10:40

Uh so this is, I think, pretty uh simply explained in the fiscal note for your reference, but we're happy to entertain any questions.

Unassigned speaker

10:47

Okay.

Speaker 1

10:48

Are there any questions?

Unassigned speaker

10:51

I think

Speaker 1

10:52

pretty straightforward.

10:53

Thank you.

Speaker 2

10:53

Thank you.

Speaker 1

10:54

All right.

10:55

Next up, Bill 7626.

10:58

This is um cottage homes county residency requirement.

11:03

And Ms.

11:04

Rodvian, this is your bill.

Speaker 4

11:06

Thank you.

11:07

So this is um a topic that we talked about.

11:09

Oh, I guess I can wait for the I'm like, we got to keep it moving today.

Unassigned speaker

11:19

All

Speaker 4

11:19

right, so this is a topic that we talked about when we passed the cottage homes bill back in I don't even remember, sometime this spring.

11:28

And um we got to the point where we didn't have any days left where we could amend the bill, but this came up as a topic of discussion.

11:37

And so I decided as um one last piece of legislation for this council, I would bring forward this really amendment to the previous bill to make sure that um cottage homes like uh like MPDUs also are given preference to Anarondal County residents, and that they stay within that um they they that continues for um 20 years for the first 20 years.

Unassigned speaker

12:10

Ms.

Speaker 1

12:10

Picker.

Speaker 5

12:12

Thank you.

12:13

The 20 year aspect is for making sure the home is occupied by a county resident, or that it has to in homeownership, it has to stay.

12:25

They can't they can't sell the market rate for 20 years.

Speaker 4

12:30

That I believe is already in the bill, but this requires well, actually, I don't know.

12:35

This this is simply addressing the residency.

12:38

So that for the 20 year period, it would also have to be sold to a county resident.

Unassigned speaker

12:43

So

Speaker 4

12:43

I don't remember where we landed in the original bill with that.

12:46

This is just addressing the residency.

12:49

I think we I think the market rate is also in as applicable for 20

Speaker 5

12:54

years.

12:55

The control period property

Unassigned speaker

12:58

for

Speaker 5

12:58

homeownership, it our other programs aren't 20 years, I don't believe.

Speaker 1

13:04

Administration ones.

13:05

I

Speaker 4

13:06

think that's actually where we got this is from the other programs that the 20 years was um the control period for others.

13:11

So we adopted that same one for or I adopted that same one for this one, so it it would be consistent with other programs.

Speaker 1

13:21

Administration, could you all address the address that's

Unassigned speaker

13:24

oh

Speaker 6

13:25

sorry, Chaucy Hall program um chief program officer for ACDS?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Health███████████████████████████████████35%
Environmental Protection██████████████14%
Economic Development███████████11%
Procedural███████7%
Education██████6%
Pending Litigation██████6%
Mental Health Awareness█████5%
Public Engagement███3%
Affordable Housing███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Anne Arundel County Council Work Session and Board of Health Meeting - October 13, 2026

The Anne Arundel County Council held its final work session of the session on October 13, 2026, discussing a transfer bill, cottage homes residency requirements, the Board of Education's capital plan, a stormwater financial assurance plan, and a complex contract amendment for a brownfield redevelopment in Glen Burnie. Following the work session, the council convened as the Board of Health to hear an extensive update from the Department of Health.

Consent Calendar

  • Bill 76-24 (Transfer Bill): Budget Officer Chris Trumbauer presented a non-controversial transfer bill correcting accounting for a state grant pass-through to Annapolis and backfilling Empire Towers grant funds. The council had no questions.

Discussion Items

  • Bill 76-26 (Cottage Homes County Residency Requirement): Councilmember Rodvian introduced an amendment to require cottage homes to give purchasing preference to county residents for the first 20 years, mirroring MPDU requirements. Chauncey Hall (AACDS) confirmed the county's intent to align the programs. The council supported the measure.
  • Resolution 34-26 (Board of Education Capital Improvement Program): The council discussed the annual resolution supporting state IAC funding applications. Councilmember Rodvian expressed concerns about a proposed feasibility study for a standalone PVA high school, questioning equity, transportation logistics, and the impact on existing school arts programs versus a centralized hub. Jeff Hagen (AACPS) explained the study is exploratory and part of a parallel track alongside other capital projects. Councilmember Picker noted the Glen Burnie High School feasibility study did not lead to immediate construction.
  • Resolution 35-26 (NPDES Financial Assurance Plan): Eric Michelson (DPW) presented the required plan. Councilmember Volke questioned projected fee increases (3-5%) given the county is ahead of acreage targets and running a revenue surplus. The administration confirmed the plan forecasts needs but does not legally bind future councils to specific rate levels, as rates are set annually in the budget process.
  • Resolution 36-26 (County Property 7409 Baltimore Annapolis Blvd - Sawmill Creek Redevelopment): This item generated extensive debate. The administration requested an amendment to reduce density (townhomes replacing mix), allow 15% unit flexibility, and extend the feasibility period to January 31, 2027, citing methane contamination, unsuitable soils, and title issues. Councilmember Volke argued the original contract expired on July 9, 2026, the county lacked authority for a unilateral extension, no notice to proceed was issued, and the deposit should have been returned. He characterized the request as a new contract requiring a new appraisal and developer financial transparency. The Office of Law maintained the contract could be revived and that the parties acted in good faith pending council ratification. Councilmember Picker strongly supported the partnership, framing the environmental remediation and affordable housing benefits as critical, and thanked the developer for not walking away from the complex site. Councilmember Fiedler questioned the adequacy of the timeline, MPDU percentages, and the long-term methane mitigation plan. The administration committed to providing appraisals and soil data before the October 19th vote.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No oral public comments were made during the work session or Board of Health meeting.

Key Outcomes

  • No formal votes were taken on the legislative items, as the session was a work session. Final votes are scheduled for the legislative session on October 19, 2026.
  • The council directed the administration to provide appraisals, soil gas data, and a financial framework for the 7409 project before the vote.
  • Board of Health Meeting: The meeting was informational. Dr. Tony Geddon and Dr. Bada highlighted the impending Medicaid changes (work requirements, semi-annual renewals), new programs (maternal peer support, expanded sexual health clinics serving 207 clients with over 95% walk-in rate, overdose loss survivor support), and data on vaccination rates and county health indicators. No formal board actions were taken.

Meeting Transcript

The October thirteenth, twenty twenty-six work session of the Anne Randall Cabin Council is called to order. This is our last work session of this session. Please ensure all electronic devices are in silent mode. Do any of my colleagues have any questions before we begin? Okay. I'm Chris Trumbauer, budget officer. I'm joined by Brian Sheng from Finance and Lori Blair from Office of Law. This is a transfer bill. It does three things. So it didn't affect where the funding went and it didn't really affect the budget, but this is correcting it so that it's a um a correct uh record of what actually happened. Um so those changes are incorporated in this bill, and then there are two actual money transfers. Um one is backfilling money for the state grant that went to the city of Annapolis for the 250 celebration. The county is just a pass through entity for that. Um, but we had to do the accounting, and that's what this uh bill does. And then the second one backfills funding that we did for the Empire Towers uh small business grants, and that comes from the CAO fund. Uh so this is, I think, pretty uh simply explained in the fiscal note for your reference, but we're happy to entertain any questions. Okay. Are there any questions? I think pretty straightforward. Thank you. Thank you. All right. Next up, Bill 7626. This is um cottage homes county residency requirement. And Ms. Rodvian, this is your bill. Thank you. So this is um a topic that we talked about. Oh, I guess I can wait for the I'm like, we got to keep it moving today. All right, so this is a topic that we talked about when we passed the cottage homes bill back in I don't even remember, sometime this spring. And um we got to the point where we didn't have any days left where we could amend the bill, but this came up as a topic of discussion. And so I decided as um one last piece of legislation for this council, I would bring forward this really amendment to the previous bill to make sure that um cottage homes like uh like MPDUs also are given preference to Anarondal County residents, and that they stay within that um they they that continues for um 20 years for the first 20 years. Ms. Picker. Thank you. The 20 year aspect is for making sure the home is occupied by a county resident, or that it has to in homeownership, it has to stay. They can't they can't sell the market rate for 20 years. That I believe is already in the bill, but this requires well, actually, I don't know. This this is simply addressing the residency. So that for the 20 year period, it would also have to be sold to a county resident. So I don't remember where we landed in the original bill with that. This is just addressing the residency. I think we I think the market rate is also in as applicable for 20 years.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com