OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Anne Arundel County, Maryland/County Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Anne Arundel County Council Final Legislative Session Votes on Zoning, Ethics, and Personnel – October 19, 2026

County Council — Monday, October 19, 2026
BodyAnne Arundel County, Maryland
SessionCounty Council
DateMonday, October 19, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 6:19:24

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

3:40

Session of the Anne Randle County Council is called to order.

3:42

Please ensure all phones and electronic devices are set silent based on section three three oh five B fifteen of the general provisions article of the annotated code of Maryland.

Speaker 2

4:25

Five in the affirmative two, and then I gave the motion to go into closed session

Speaker 1

4:28

has passed.

Unassigned speaker

57:54

The

Speaker 1

57:54

Anna Rundle County Council is now convened to hold the legislative portion of the October nineteenth, twenty twenty-six meeting.

58:01

Please ensure all phones and electronic devices are set to silent.

Speaker 3

58:30

Grant us patience to listen, humility to consider different perspectives, and courage to make decisions rooted in fairness and integrity.

58:44

Guide our words, our actions, and our decisions tonight.

Speaker 4

1:00:01

Shannon Ledbetter.

1:00:05

Pete Smith.

1:00:09

Lisa Rodvian and Alison Pickard to come get your gold library card.

1:00:16

Just so you know, here's what it looks like mounted.

1:00:20

You can also actually get one of these to use in the library if you want to replace your old library card and try to try to learn a new library card number.

1:00:30

But here you go.

1:00:31

We really appreciate all you've done in the time you've been on council, and here you go.

Speaker 1

1:00:36

Very nice.

Speaker 5

1:00:47

We got two libraries to

Unassigned speaker

1:00:48

build.

Speaker 5

1:00:48

That's right.

Speaker 6

1:00:51

Gold library card.

Speaker 7

1:00:55

I know.

1:00:56

I want one.

Speaker 8

1:01:00

Janet Webber is my council person.

1:01:05

Thank you.

Speaker 1

1:01:08

Very cool.

1:01:09

All right.

Speaker 9

1:01:22

Very nice.

Speaker 1

1:01:28

Thank you, Skip.

1:01:29

That's really neat.

1:01:30

I want a gold library card.

1:01:33

Very cool.

1:01:35

All right.

Speaker 2

1:01:36

Um, Madam Secretary, please read the ethics statement.

1:01:39

The ethics commission has asked that I advise you that under certain circumstances, members of the public may qualify as lobbyists when they testify before the county council.

1:01:47

If so, the law requires that certain information be filed with the ethics commission.

1:01:51

The chair of the ethics commission has asked that those who wish to testify in any form review the general information on lobbying sheet located on the ethics website under forms and publications.

1:02:00

If there are any questions about lobbying requirements, please contact the Ethics Commission at 410-222-4412.

1:02:07

Okay.

Speaker 1

1:02:08

Before we open our discussions and public hearings, I would like to remind everyone in attendance, whether a testifying or as a member of the audience, that we must maintain decorum at all times in these chambers.

1:02:20

Please understand that individual conversations in the audience are very disruptive to the proceedings, and I would kindly ask you to step out of the chambers if a side discussion is necessary.

1:02:31

As stated in the council rules procedure and posted outside the chamber doors, if anyone makes personal defamatory or profane remarks or willfully utters loud, threatening or abusive language that disturbs the orderly conduct of our meeting, you will be removed from the meeting.

1:02:49

Please remember this is a business meeting.

1:02:51

We don't do clapping here for that, but if you are in support of what someone's saying, you can jazz hands or stand up in support.

1:02:58

And we will see all of that, we promise.

1:03:00

So we will now open our invitation to the audience.

1:03:05

This is an opportunity to speak briefly on any subject not included in the printed agenda.

1:03:11

Madam Secretary, did we receive any testimony through the online testimony tool?

Speaker 2

1:03:15

Yes, madam chair.

1:03:16

We received seven pieces which were shared with the council, added to the record, and posted to the website.

Speaker 1

1:03:21

Okay.

1:03:21

We will now call on individuals who signed up ahead of the meeting.

1:03:25

When I call your name, please come up to the table and have a seat.

1:03:28

When it was your turn, state your name and address for the record.

1:03:32

Remarks will be limited to two minutes.

1:03:34

Please listen for the buzzer and respect the two-minute time limit as others are signed up to speak.

1:03:40

If you have more than two minutes to share, I'm going to ask you to submit your additional thoughts using our online testimony tool.

1:03:47

Signed up ahead of time.

1:03:48

We have Kurt Svensson, Sarah McIntyre, Corey Melinowski, and Steven Stern.

1:03:55

And if there's anyone else who didn't want wishes to speak on an item not on the agenda, you may also come up at this time.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning And Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████41%
Procedural█████████████████████████████29%
Public Engagement██████████10%
Public Safety█████5%
Personnel Matters███3%
Affordable Housing██2%
Technology and Innovation██2%
Community Engagement██2%
Campaign Finance██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Anne Arundel County Council Final Legislative Session – October 19, 2026

The Anne Arundel County Council held its final legislative session of the 2023-2026 term on Monday, October 19, 2026, beginning in the evening and crossing midnight. The council recognized outgoing members, heard extensive public comment, approved routine and personnel measures, adopted ethics and surveillance oversight resolutions, defeated the comprehensive Article 18 zoning rewrite, and adjourned to December 7, 2026.

Consent Calendar (Routine Approvals)

  • The minutes of the October 5, 2026 legislative session were approved as read.
  • Resolution 36 was withdrawn at the administration's request.
  • Bill 68-26, an emergency ordinance transferring capital appropriations from the Town Center to Reese Road and Culvert Invert Paving projects, passed 7-0.
  • Bill 75-26, a supplementary appropriations and technical correction ordinance, passed 7-0.
  • Resolutions 34-26 (FY2028 school construction capital improvement request support), 35-26 (NPDES Phase 1 MS4 financial assurance plan), and 37-26 (student member to the Human Relations Commission) were adopted 7-0.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Kurt Svensson (Arnold) opposed ballot Question A, arguing it would transfer final fiscal authority over labor agreements to an unelected arbitrator, and criticized recent charter amendments and the council pay increase.
  • Colin Nemhard (Glen Burnie) warned against lawmaking by rhetoric and said workforce families deserve thriving neighborhoods, not overcrowded schools and roads.
  • Matt Minahan (Growth Action Network) thanked the council, praised accomplishments, and listed unfinished priorities including impact fees, lower residential density, higher affordable-housing yield than 10-15%, and a rechartered Planning Advisory Board.
  • Corey Malinowski and Michael Brown raised cybersecurity oversight. Brown said the county's second breach in 18 months was discovered August 28, 2026, 45 days after a council briefing, and cited the proposed $4.3 million IT spending increase after the first breach.
  • Stephen Stern, Liz Glass, Michael Glass, and Jody Goldsmith described an anti-Semitic incident at an Annapolis City Council meeting. Goldsmith said a poll found 21% of Americans and 35% of adults ages 18-34 consider anti-Semitism a legitimate form of protest, and urged adoption of the IHRA definition and continued protection of Jewish residents.
  • Sarah McIntyre (South River Youth Association) requested permanent lighting for practice fields, saying her organization pays about $9,000 per year for temporary generator lights for 10 football teams.
  • Casey Cameron (Anne Arundel County Professional Firefighters Local 1563) said starting firefighters will now earn less than the county council president and urged competitive wages, staffing, and resources.
  • Michael Lofton and David Dickerson advocated for public acquisition and partnership for the Discovery Village site, citing nearly 3,600 boat launches this year and plans for marine education and community space.
  • Tom Weddle (Gambrills) opposed continued rezoning/development near the MARC station, saying elected officials should represent current residents, not developers or people who may move there in the future.
  • Other speakers expressed solidarity with Jewish residents and thanked outgoing members for their service.

Discussion Items

  • Bill 61-26 as amended (Article 18 zoning update): The administration called it a long-awaited cleanup of a complicated code last comprehensively reviewed in 2005. Councilman Volkey questioned provisions that make the Planning and Zoning Officer the interpreter of the code and require consistency with Plan 2040. Councilwoman Fiedler noted her amendment requiring an owner to be present for inspections was not adopted. Public testimony was overwhelmingly opposed: farmers, small-business owners, the Southern Anne Arundel Chamber of Commerce, and residents cited the 240-plus-page size, right-of-entry language, accessory-structure caps, agritourism definitions, food-truck restrictions, infrastructure impacts, and a rushed process. Supporters included the Anne Arundel County Farm Bureau and Growth Action Network, who said the bill had been improved and many fears were based on existing law. One speaker, Elizabeth Rossborg, said there were 42 in-person opponents, more than 50 online opponents, and 3 proponents. Council members disagreed sharply about 'misinformation'; Chair Hummer and Councilwoman Rodvian said the bill did not change certain provisions, and the Fourth Amendment still limits inspections. Councilman Volkey argued nearly 100 amendments were never considered and the bill was not ready. The bill was defeated 0-7.
  • Bill 65-26 as amended (campaign contribution disclosure and comprehensive zoning integrity): This ethics bill added disclosure/integrity requirements for certain zoning-related campaign contributions. Public testimony included supporters asking for a 24-month lookback and coverage of family members/lobbyists, while the Anne Arundel County Association of Realtors opposed it. The council passed it 7-0.
  • Bill 66-26 as amended (ethics enforcement): This bill allowed the Ethics Commission to levy fines up to $5,000. It passed 7-0.
  • Bill 67-26 as amended (BWI mixed-use overlay): Councilman Smith said it followed prior community conversations, while the administration opposed it because the Region 1 plan called for a sector study first. It passed 7-0.
  • Bill 69-26 (personnel reclassifications): The bill reclassified three vacant positions, including moving a health department role to a deputy health officer. Councilman Volkey voted no, citing the loss of a crisis intervention counselor and the increased cost of the new $147,000 position. It passed 6-1.
  • Bill 70-26 as amended (optional concept plan): This created an optional concept-plan step for development review. Critics, including Growth Action Network and Greater Severna Park Council, said it lacked deadlines, weakened stormwater review, and reduced public accountability; supporters said it would improve early community input and help smaller developers. It passed 4-3, with Ledbetter, Volkey, and Fiedler voting no.
  • Bill 71-26 (Neighborhood Preservation and Environmental Protection Act): Councilman Volkey proposed removing triplexes, fourplexes, and multifamily uses from single-family districts and repealing certain density increases from the 2024 Housing Attainability Act. The administration opposed it. Public testimony was split: housing advocates and realtors opposed, while some neighborhood residents supported it. After the hearing closed, the chair announced that midnight had ended legislative time, so no vote could occur. Councilwoman Pickard said she would have voted no, and Councilwoman Rodvian raised concerns about housing affordability for the next generation.
  • Resolution 38-26 (automatic license plate readers): The council suspended rules to consider this resolution, which urges the incoming council to review police ALPR/Flock camera policies. It was adopted 7-0.

Key Outcomes

  • Bill 61-26 (Article 18 zoning update): defeated 0-7.
  • Bill 65-26: passed 7-0.
  • Bill 66-26: passed 7-0.
  • Bill 67-26: passed 7-0.
  • Bill 69-26: passed 6-1.
  • Bill 70-26: passed 4-3.
  • Bill 71-26: no vote; not reached before the midnight cutoff.
  • Resolution 38-26 adopted 7-0; Resolutions 34-26, 35-26, and 37-26 adopted 7-0; Resolution 36 withdrawn.
  • The council adjourned to Monday, December 7, 2026, at 5 p.m. for the new council swearing-in and 7 p.m. legislative session.

Meeting Transcript

Session of the Anne Randle County Council is called to order. Please ensure all phones and electronic devices are set silent based on section three three oh five B fifteen of the general provisions article of the annotated code of Maryland. Five in the affirmative two, and then I gave the motion to go into closed session has passed. The Anna Rundle County Council is now convened to hold the legislative portion of the October nineteenth, twenty twenty-six meeting. Please ensure all phones and electronic devices are set to silent. Grant us patience to listen, humility to consider different perspectives, and courage to make decisions rooted in fairness and integrity. Guide our words, our actions, and our decisions tonight. Shannon Ledbetter. Pete Smith. Lisa Rodvian and Alison Pickard to come get your gold library card. Just so you know, here's what it looks like mounted. You can also actually get one of these to use in the library if you want to replace your old library card and try to try to learn a new library card number. But here you go. We really appreciate all you've done in the time you've been on council, and here you go. Very nice. We got two libraries to build. That's right. Gold library card. I know. I want one. Janet Webber is my council person. Thank you. Very cool. All right. Very nice. Thank you, Skip. That's really neat. I want a gold library card. Very cool. All right. Um, Madam Secretary, please read the ethics statement. The ethics commission has asked that I advise you that under certain circumstances, members of the public may qualify as lobbyists when they testify before the county council. If so, the law requires that certain information be filed with the ethics commission. The chair of the ethics commission has asked that those who wish to testify in any form review the general information on lobbying sheet located on the ethics website under forms and publications. If there are any questions about lobbying requirements, please contact the Ethics Commission at 410-222-4412. Okay. Before we open our discussions and public hearings, I would like to remind everyone in attendance, whether a testifying or as a member of the audience, that we must maintain decorum at all times in these chambers. Please understand that individual conversations in the audience are very disruptive to the proceedings, and I would kindly ask you to step out of the chambers if a side discussion is necessary. As stated in the council rules procedure and posted outside the chamber doors, if anyone makes personal defamatory or profane remarks or willfully utters loud, threatening or abusive language that disturbs the orderly conduct of our meeting, you will be removed from the meeting. Please remember this is a business meeting. We don't do clapping here for that, but if you are in support of what someone's saying, you can jazz hands or stand up in support. And we will see all of that, we promise. So we will now open our invitation to the audience. This is an opportunity to speak briefly on any subject not included in the printed agenda. Madam Secretary, did we receive any testimony through the online testimony tool? Yes, madam chair. We received seven pieces which were shared with the council, added to the record, and posted to the website.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com