The Beaverton Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 15, 2025, beginning at approximately 7:00 PM and adjourning at 7:48 PM. The meeting addressed three land use applications: a major expansion of the HMT Recreation Complex to include a 12-court pickleball facility, a new conditional use for Willamette Valley Academy, and a comprehensive plan amendment to designate two town center boundaries. Commissioner Holmes was excused and absent. All votes were unanimous.
Commissioner McAvoy. Hi. Commissioner McCann. Here. Commissioner Mettler. Here. Commissioner Speck. Here. And Commissioner Winter. Let the record show that Commissioner Holmes is excused and absent from the meeting tonight. We are now at Commission Communications. Commission, any communications. Looks like no communications. We are now at staff communications. Staff in the communications. Good evening, Chair. My name is Anna Slatinski. I'm the planning division manager here in Beaverton. I'd like to just remind the Commission that these microphones really require to speak quite directly into the microphone. Hopefully I'm speaking directly enough right now so that anyone who is observing the meeting remotely will be able to hear everything. And I just have one announcement to share tonight, which is that the Beaverton Climate Action Plan is holding an open house on November 13th here at City Hall from 5 to 7. You can get more information on the Beaverton City website at Beaverton Oregon.gov slash BC. I would just Google Beaverton Climate Action Plan, to be perfectly honest. That's what I do to find these things. But it's an opportunity to get community feedback on that planning process and has a nice relevance to planning commission issues. And that is all of my comments for tonight. Excellent. Thank you. Now we're on to new business. Case file numbers CU 32025-00327. DR 32025-00328. RP 22025-000382 and TP 12025-00533. This item was continued from the August 20th, 2025 Planning Commission agenda. Before we move to the substance of the hearing, I will ask City Attorney to cover the prehearing matters. Thank you, Chair. Good evening, Commissioners. I'm Robin McIntyre, Assistant City Attorney. I'm going to do a brief prehearing statement. The criteria that must be addressed in this hearing are development code sections 40.03.1 facilities review. 40.15.15.4 C major modification of a conditional use. 40.20.15.3c design review 3. 40.45.15.3c replat 2. 40.90 15.1.C, tree plan one. Testimony arguments and evidence must be directed toward these approval criteria or other criteria in the comprehensive plan or development code that the speaker believes apply to the application. Failure to raise an issue accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to allow the planning commission and other interested parties an opportunity to respond may preclude an appeal to the land use board of appeals based on that issue. Anyone who submits written comments or gives oral testimony has standing to appeal this decision. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues related to the proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow the city to respond may preclude an action for damages in circuit court. No on all three. No to all three. No to all three.