OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

贝尔维尤交通委员会会议 - 2026年2月13日

City CouncilFriday, February 13, 2026
BodyBellevue, Washington
SessionCity Council
DateFriday, February 13, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:23:29

Transcript — Verbatim
0:47

Okay, can you hear us now?

0:50

Can you hear us now?

0:55

Can the person online hear us?

0:59

Okay, fantastic.

1:01

Thank you for letting us know.

1:03

Okay.

1:04

Um approval of agenda.

1:06

So it all is in front of you and was in our email earlier.

1:08

Uh do I have a motion to approve the agenda?

1:11

So moved.

1:13

So a second.

1:15

Second.

1:16

All right.

1:16

Are there any amendments or changes proposed?

1:20

No.

1:21

Okay.

1:22

Any objections to what we have.

1:25

All right, approved.

1:28

All right.

1:29

Jumping to oral and written communications.

1:31

Uh Kevin's been good as always with forwarding us to us the written communications that he's received since our last meeting, which is all the way back in October.

1:40

Ummunications.

1:42

I don't know who we have here tonight.

1:46

I have two people signed up.

1:48

Okay.

1:51

The first person who signed up is Robert Armstead.

1:56

And I don't see Robert's online, and I don't see him here.

2:01

Okay.

2:01

So the next person signed up is Vic Bishop, who I also don't see online.

2:06

Let me double check.

2:10

Vic's there.

2:10

Okay.

2:11

So I will allow you to talk.

2:13

Go ahead, Vic.

2:14

You got three minutes.

2:15

Welcome, Vic.

2:16

Thank you.

2:17

Thank you, Vic Bishop.

2:19

Uh, I think most of you know who I am.

2:21

I'm a uh professional traffic engineer and former member of your commission and chair of your commission about a decade or so ago.

2:30

I'm here to talk about speed limits.

2:34

Um I just want to caution you to be extremely careful about lowering the speed limits around the city.

2:42

The issue of speed limits is a long, well-established traffic engineering issue that is well established in in data.

2:53

The 85th percentile concept is absolutely uh uh uh an important issue, and if you attempt to go below much below the 85th percentile of what's actually happening, 85th percentile is based upon a spot speed survey randomly done uh of a hundred vehicles, and if you get more than uh uh i if you attempt to put the speed limit more than five miles an hour before the existing eighty-fifth percentile, you will fail miserably.

3:33

And I've proved that I've I spent the decade of the eighties doing traffic safety studies all over the state, including speed limit studies, and I proved in Lynnwood specifically that they had a whole bunch of streets at 25 miles an hour, and I did I did uh 30 or so speed studies all over the city, convinced the council to raise the speed limit from 25 to 30, and in some cases to 35, and then got them to let me uh do the speed studies again, and the speeds were lowered when we raised the speed limit.

4:17

You cannot force the public to go slower than they're willing to go.

4:23

The parkway is a classic example, and I encourage you to leave the Westlake Sammamish Parkway at the 30 miles an hour and 35 miles an hour that it currently is, and the thought of reducing the entire park away from I-90 to Redmond to 25 miles an hour to me.

5:00

Uh if you did that and you recommended that, and I certainly hope that you demand that 85 that spot speed surveys be completed after the speed limits are changed and not just after, but after it settles down a bit and you get the cops out of there, and you let the public do what they're gonna do, and you will find that 25 is going to be too low for a lot of the streets.

5:15

Certainly the parkway, I think Bell Red is probably another one that same similar thing.

5:21

And I just encourage you to be very cautious and use the traffic engineering information.

5:27

Thank you, Vic.

5:28

Your sense.

5:29

Your time is up.

5:30

Sorry to interrupt you.

5:33

Thanks for the input.

5:36

Uh did the second person online show up?

5:38

Okay.

5:38

Then is there anybody in the room who would like to speak who did not sign up?

5:44

And nobody else online who wants to speak up.

5:46

Anybody online that hasn't announced themselves?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Transportation Safety█████████████████████████████████████████████59%
Public Engagement████████████████21%
Procedural███████████14%
Public Transportation███4%
Active Transportation██2%
Summary of Proceedings

贝尔维尤交通委员会会议 - 2026年2月13日

会议于2026年2月13日下午5:30开始。委员会批准了议程,听取了公众意见,审议了章程修正案,并参加了关于主干道限速降低和交通改善计划更新的学习会议。

同意议程

  • 批准了2025年10月9日的会议纪要,并进行了修正(日期更正)。

公众意见与证词

  • Vic Bishop(前交通委员会成员,专业交通工程师)就限速降低发表了意见。他警告不要将限速降低到低于第85百分位速度,引用其在林伍德的经验,提高限速后实际速度反而降低。他特别要求将Westlake Sammamish Parkway保持在30-35英里/小时,反对将其降至25英里/小时,并建议在限速变更后进行现场速度调查。

讨论事项

交通委员会章程修正案

  • 助理市检察官Heather Jones介绍了四项修正案,以实施贝尔维尤市议会于2025年9月通过的变更:
    1. 将因扰乱会议而被排除在外的期限从60天延长至180天。
    2. 澄清上诉程序,以便在向市议会提出及时上诉时提供额外时间。
    3. 委员会任期限制:任何委员会连续两届后必须间隔两年,以扩大公众参与机会。
    4. 非实质性变更,包括代词更新(将"his or her"改为"their")。
  • 委员们就定义、生效日期(经投票立即生效)以及与市议会任期的区别进行了澄清。计划于2026年3月12日的会议上批准修正案。

学习会议:主干道限速降低(安全速度贝尔维尤)

  • John Murphy(社区交通服务经理)介绍了该倡议。背景:自2025年5月启动,重点评估当前限速在30英里/小时或更高的道路(占总道路里程的25%,但占死亡和重伤事故地点的近90%)。四条评估走廊的限速从35英里/小时降至25或30英里/小时后,超速行驶(40英里/小时以上)减少了19%-42%。
  • 提案方法:基于冲突(交叉口、车道入口)和活动(行人、自行车混合)设置速度。市中心(除Old Bellevue外)建议限速25英里/小时,Old Bellevue为20英里/小时。总体而言,约60%的道路将降低5英里/小时,20%降低10英里/小时,20%不变。将取消所有40英里/小时的限速。
  • 委员们提出了以下问题:
    • 成功指标(速度降低 vs. 长期伤亡数据)。
    • 交通分流和执法问题(例如,Bell Red Road)。
    • 特定走廊的详细数据(Lakemont Boulevard、Coal Creek Parkway)。
    • 与类似城市(如柯克兰、雷德蒙德)的比较。
  • 员工确认将与雷德蒙德协调共享道路(如148大道东北段)。计划于2026年6月向市议会提出最终建议。

2027-2032年交通改善计划(TIP)更新

  • Christy Ostervian(资本项目与设施规划经理)介绍了年度TIP更新。TIP是一份为期六年的无资金计划,包含城市和区域项目,用于规划并支持拨款申请。
  • 变更摘要:第一部分增加6个项目,移除1个;第二部分增加1个,移除6个;第三部分增加3个,移除23个,19个转入第二部分;第四部分无变化。
  • 委员会批准了推荐项目清单,并设定了2026年5月14日的公开听证会(动议通过,一致赞成)。

关键成果

  • 批准了2027-2032年TIP项目清单,并设定公开听证会日期为2026年5月14日(动议通过,无人反对)。
  • 指示员工将交通委员会章程修正案纳入2026年3月12日会议的议程以供批准。
  • 计划于2026年3月12日参观交通管理中心,作为委员会会议的一部分。
  • 关于限速降低,委员会未采取正式行动,但提出了反馈意见,员工将继续开展外展工作并于2026年6月返回市议会。

Meeting Transcript

Okay, can you hear us now? Can you hear us now? Can the person online hear us? Okay, fantastic. Thank you for letting us know. Okay. Um approval of agenda. So it all is in front of you and was in our email earlier. Uh do I have a motion to approve the agenda? So moved. So a second. Second. All right. Are there any amendments or changes proposed? No. Okay. Any objections to what we have. All right, approved. All right. Jumping to oral and written communications. Uh Kevin's been good as always with forwarding us to us the written communications that he's received since our last meeting, which is all the way back in October. Ummunications. I don't know who we have here tonight. I have two people signed up. Okay. The first person who signed up is Robert Armstead. And I don't see Robert's online, and I don't see him here. Okay. So the next person signed up is Vic Bishop, who I also don't see online. Let me double check. Vic's there. Okay. So I will allow you to talk. Go ahead, Vic. You got three minutes. Welcome, Vic. Thank you. Thank you, Vic Bishop. Uh, I think most of you know who I am. I'm a uh professional traffic engineer and former member of your commission and chair of your commission about a decade or so ago. I'm here to talk about speed limits. Um I just want to caution you to be extremely careful about lowering the speed limits around the city. The issue of speed limits is a long, well-established traffic engineering issue that is well established in in data. The 85th percentile concept is absolutely uh uh uh an important issue, and if you attempt to go below much below the 85th percentile of what's actually happening, 85th percentile is based upon a spot speed survey randomly done uh of a hundred vehicles, and if you get more than uh uh i if you attempt to put the speed limit more than five miles an hour before the existing eighty-fifth percentile, you will fail miserably. And I've proved that I've I spent the decade of the eighties doing traffic safety studies all over the state, including speed limit studies, and I proved in Lynnwood specifically that they had a whole bunch of streets at 25 miles an hour, and I did I did uh 30 or so speed studies all over the city, convinced the council to raise the speed limit from 25 to 30, and in some cases to 35, and then got them to let me uh do the speed studies again, and the speeds were lowered when we raised the speed limit. You cannot force the public to go slower than they're willing to go. The parkway is a classic example, and I encourage you to leave the Westlake Sammamish Parkway at the 30 miles an hour and 35 miles an hour that it currently is, and the thought of reducing the entire park away from I-90 to Redmond to 25 miles an hour to me. Uh if you did that and you recommended that, and I certainly hope that you demand that 85 that spot speed surveys be completed after the speed limits are changed and not just after, but after it settles down a bit and you get the cops out of there, and you let the public do what they're gonna do, and you will find that 25 is going to be too low for a lot of the streets. Certainly the parkway, I think Bell Red is probably another one that same similar thing. And I just encourage you to be very cautious and use the traffic engineering information.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com