Bellevue Transportation Commission Meeting – July 10, 2026
Bellevue Transportation Commission Meeting – July 10, 2026
This meeting of the Bellevue Transportation Commission began at 6:45 PM and adjourned at 8:45 PM. The commission elected officers, heard public comments, received staff reports, and held study sessions on the Factoria and Eastgate Neighborhood Area Plans (NAPs) and the 2026 Mobility Implementation Plan (MIP) update. Commissioners directed staff to conduct further analysis on MIP performance metrics while maintaining current standards unless compelling justification emerges.
Election of Officers
- Vice Chair McGill was elected Chair by acclamation after no other nominations were received.
- Commissioner Williams was elected Vice Chair after Commissioner Stash withdrew from the nomination.
Public Comments & Testimony
Six members of the public provided oral comments:
- Diana Leo (Vice President of Government Affairs, Bellevue Chamber) expressed support for updating bicycle and pedestrian level of traffic stress measures but had "serious concerns" about relaxing volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio performance targets. She argued that lowering targets should be a "last resort, not a first step" and asked for an evaluation of engineering alternatives before any changes.
- Maria Frost (Vice President of Government Affairs, Kemper Development) thanked staff for eliminating the 20% speed limit multiplier but strongly opposed weakening V/C targets on regional corridors and freeway access points. She urged the commission to decline further analysis that would weaken targets and instead focus on operational and engineering alternatives.
- David Bonathan (resident of Maidenbauer neighborhood) described dangerous speeding and illegal exhaust noise on Lake Washington Boulevard, stating it "literally feels like a 24-7 race track." He requested speed enforcement, fixed speed cameras, sound enforcement cameras, a reduced 20 mph speed limit, and a four-way stop at 100th and First.
- Scott Lampy (Maidenbauer Bay Neighbors Association, former transportation commissioner) supported the proposed speed limit reductions but recommended extending the 20 mph zone one block to 99th Avenue Northeast and Lake Washington Boulevard for pedestrian safety.
- Vic Bishop (50-year resident, former commissioner, retired transportation engineer) said the staff recommendation to review V/C standards as a way to change the standard for congestion rather than increase capacity is "nonsense." He argued the city has changed standards before to reduce the number of failing intersections and should instead produce a priority list of capacity improvements.
- Alex Simmerman (resident) delivered a lengthy, critical statement accusing the city of being unprepared for traffic growth, calling commissioners "criminal" and "degenerative idioti," and claiming that red-light cameras have wasted millions of dollars. He stated the only solution is to block cars from the city entirely.
- Joe (online commenter) objected to Alex Simmerman's remarks as racist, sexist, and anti-American. He encouraged Bellevue to adopt more multimodal transportation, citing Redmond's lime scooters and bikes.
- Heidi Dean (Newport Hills resident) commented on the Factoria NAP, stating that its policies appear driven by "anti-car urbanists" rather than residents. She noted that traffic congestion is a huge concern but the mobility survey questions were worded to drive respondents toward biking, walking, and transit, ignoring vehicle solutions. She also opposed changing V/C numbers, saying it creates the "appearance that intersections aren't failing as badly as they actually are."
Staff Reports
- Kevin McDonald reported that gift boxes from the Bellevue City Council had been distributed to commissioners (except Vice Chair Williams, who received hers earlier). He also announced that a bike network project on Lake Washington Boulevard, 100th Avenue Northeast, and Northeast First—including a 20 mph speed limit reduction on Northeast First—is imminent, with construction expected to start in early July.
Study Session: Factoria and Eastgate Neighborhood Area Plans
Senior Planner Zach Lucan presented draft NAP transportation policies and concept maps for Eastgate and Factoria. Key points from the discussion:
- Community engagement: Staff reported over 1,200 touches at 31 events. Commissioners questioned the representativeness of the outreach, especially for residents who drive. Commissioner Kilman asked if the input reflected a majority of residents; staff acknowledged it is a small percentage but said they exceeded typical survey response rates (2–3%).
- Survey design: Several commissioners noted that the mobility survey did not include vehicle congestion relief as a multiple-choice option, potentially biasing results toward alternative modes. Staff explained they used open-ended questions and later coded responses.
- Congestion concerns: In Factoria, congestion emerged as a defining theme from open-ended questions. Heidi Dean and others argued the draft policies did not adequately address vehicle traffic. Staff responded that the NAPs are meant to supplement the MIP, not duplicate it, and that the MIP already has performance metrics for congestion.
- Vision statements: The draft vision for Eastgate emphasizes walking, biking, and transit, which some commissioners felt excluded driving. Staff said the vision is aspirational and reflects community desire to move away from auto dependence.
- No formal recommendation was requested at this meeting; feedback will be shared with the Planning Commission.
Study Session: 2026 Mobility Implementation Plan Update
Kevin McDonald and consultant Chris Breland presented four topics for commission direction:
- Speed limit changes: Council is set to adopt lower speed limits on many arterials (June 23, 2026). Commissioners unanimously agreed to update MIP maps, tables, and figures to reflect the new speed limits. A formal recommendation will be sought at the July 9 meeting.
- Speed limit factor (1.2× speed limit): Staff proposed replacing the 1.2 multiplier with the adopted speed limit for calculating pedestrian and bicycle level of traffic stress, citing actual speed data that shows the multiplier overestimates speeds in many areas. Commissioners supported further study but asked staff to also consider a 1.1 multiplier or a segmented citywide approach rather than a simple switch to the speed limit.
- Regional corridors V/C targets (PMA3): Staff requested direction to analyze capacity improvements and trade-offs on regional arterials (e.g., 148th Avenue, Bellevue Way, Coal Creek Parkway) where 2045 forecasts show failing V/C ratios. Commissioners strongly opposed lowering the 0.85 target. Several members (Commissioners Ting, Williams, Kilman, and others) expressed that changing the standard would be disingenuous and that allowing intersections to remain yellow or red is preferable. Direction was given to study capacity alternatives but not to lower the standard unless compelling evidence is presented.
- Freeway access intersections: Similar direction: study alternatives and constraints but do not lower the V/C target.
Key Outcomes
- Officers elected: Chair McGill and Vice Chair Williams.
- MIP direction: Staff will return with updated maps and figures reflecting new speed limits and a revised speed limit factor analysis. For regional corridors and freeway access points, staff will analyze capacity improvements and trade-offs but will not change V/C performance targets unless the commission later approves a change based on strong justification.
- Neighborhood area plans: No action taken; feedback will be forwarded to the Planning Commission.
- Minutes: Approved by motion.
- Next meeting: July 9, 2026 (special meeting) to receive the MIP analysis results.
Meeting Transcript
I just mean years. Yeah, you should don't worry. Once it's perfected, we're gonna say it shouldn't come through then. And I think there is a switch. I think it's been delayed. I honestly don't know. Okay, goes on. All right, audio sounds. I wonder once more. Um we just did roll call. Commissioner Welcher, can you acknowledge that you are here, please? I do acknowledge I'm here. All right, good. So we do have well, here we are. I got a thumbs up from Kevin. Do you have a hand raised or something? Okay. Okay, good. All right. Then let's start with the election of officers. Uh Kevin, could you please announce who you have nominated for chair? For the for the position of chair, so far I've received one nomination. Um the nomination is uh currently for Vice Chair McGill. Um, we can accept any nominations from the floor. And if we see none, um, Vice Chair McGill would become chair automatically without a vote. So are there any other nominations from the floor? And Commissioner Welcher, raise your hand if you do have any. Yes, look at all this. Okay, so yeah, we'll sound like and thank you, Chair Stash for all the many dedicated years on the commission, but also as chair. I want to thank that Commissioner Team for coming in for what it was last time. Sure, so I should have it. Okay, so um, we will move on to um the election of the vice chair. Um, thank you, Chair McGill. Um as of now, I have two nominees for the position of Vice Chair. Uh Commissioner Stash and Commissioner Williams have been nominated to serve as vice chair for the coming year. Can my unnomination be? Can my unnomination happen now? Do you have a uh an unnomination to give us I officially unnominate myself, but that's even such a way. I believe we can it's never happened before, but I I believe we can set a precedent with your unnomination. And therefore, under the current process, which we just went through, um, Commissioner Williams would become our new vice chair for the next year. Thanks for for volunteering, Commissioner Williams. We'll move in right on through the uh so um do I have a motion to approve the agenda? So we're so it's been moved uh and seconded. Anybody object? There's no buttons. Uh we have the agenda. Uh let's move on to written communications. Uh, uh, you forwarded all the written communications we've seen since May 14, right? Okay. Uh so we should have those.
openpublica.com