The Berkeley City Council met in a special closed session on Tuesday, March 26, 2024, at 4:00 PM to discuss pending litigation, anticipated litigation, and labor negotiations. The meeting was held at the School District Board Room and via teleconference. The council heard public comments before convening in closed session.
Okay. Okay. And I'd like to call to order this special meeting of the Berkeley City Council for Tuesday, March 26, 2024. The first order of businesses will call if the city clerk can please call the rule. Okay. Councilmember Kisserwani is absent. Taplin. Present. Bartlett. On. Present. Wengraff. Present. Council Mr. Humbert or Mark, you currently absent. If you wanted to sign off and then we can sign back on. Okay. I'll sign off now. Right. And then Mayor Aragine. Yes. Present. Okay. There it is. Okay. We do have a quorum of the city council present. So we'll now proceed to public comment, which is limited to items on this agenda only. And uh we'll take any public comments on the uh three items on our closed session agenda this afternoon. Item one, conference of legal counsel regarding pending litigation, the case of Fisher et al. versus the City of Berkeley. Item two, conference of legal counsel regarding anticipated litigation and item three, our conference with labor negotiators under government code section 54957.6. Are there any uh public comments to any other members of the public in person at 1231 Addison Street? Seeing none, uh we'll take any speakers on Zoom. If you're on the Zoom platform would like to speak to an item on our closed session agenda, please raise your hand. Okay. First speaker's JP. Hi, can you hear me? Yes. Just like you to consider uh these two quotes. Um the first amendment really was designed to protect the debate. And I'm sorry, this is on item two. The first amendment really was designed to protect the debate at the fringes. You don't need the courts to protect speech that everybody agrees with because that speech will be tolerated. You don't need a First Amendment to protect speech that people regard as in you need a First Amendment to protect speech that people regard as intolerable or outrageous or offensive. And this quote from Justice Kennedy A law that can be directed against speech found offensive to some portion of the public can be turned against minority and dissenting views to the detriment of all. The First Amendment does not entrust that power to the government's benevolence. Let me repeat that. The First Amendment does not entrust that power to the government's benevolence. Instead, our reliance must be on the substantial safeguards of free and open discussion in a democratic society. Justice Kennedy, thank you.