The Berkeley City Council held a special meeting on April 15, 2025, to consider two interconnected wildfire safety items: the adoption of updated CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) maps with additional local designations, and the modification and adoption of local amendments to the Berkeley Fire Code (the "Ember" package). After extensive public comment and council deliberation, both items were approved unanimously.
Okay, so I oh great. So council members, we had I was entertaining a motion to accept the supplemental materials by our chief spray, and we were just waiting to have enough folks to be able to receive that. And I believe we had a motion and a second. Second. Thank you. So to uh accept the revised material from the um car department. Uh Councilmember Kessarwani. Yes. Taplin, yes. And O'Keefe. Yes. Blackaby. Yes. Lunapara. Yes. Humbert. Yes. And Mayor Ishii. Yes. Thank you very much. Thank you, everyone. I'm gonna pass it over to the chief for the presentation. Okay, good afternoon. Mayor, council, members of the community. We return here tonight after two months of collaboration with the Disaster Fire Safety Commission, many of you and members of the community. We want to begin with a recap of the two components of the Ember package that were bringing uh before you tonight for consideration. That's defensible space, specifically zone zero, and adoption of the fire hazard severity zone maps. The fires in Paradise, Santa Rosa, La Hena, and most recently in Los Angeles, and right here in Berkeley in 1923 and 1991. Um they're not surprises. Many fires occurred where fires have occurred in the past, following known topography and fueled by similar weather conditions. Fire is a natural part of the California landscape, one we cannot eliminate, but one we can learn, can and must learn to adapt to. Through defensible space and home hardening, we can build a fire adapted community and significantly reduce the risk to life and property. While fire suppression remains essential, it's not alone enough. A safer future will require all of us working together to make Berkeley more fire safe. This photo shows burn scars, a tree experience just under every 10 years, ending around the turn of the century when we began to systematically eliminate fire from the landscape. Climate change, fueled in part by wildfires, which contribute 28% of the carbon released into the atmosphere, has put a fine point on the issue. While the fire problem we face today is partially a result of climate change, it's also the result of the systematic exclusion of fire from the landscape for over 100 years. This, along with our development into fire-prone landscapes, has led to a substantially higher amount of really dry fuel in uh for fires to burn. As the climate warms, it pulls more moisture from that fuel and dries it out, increasing its ignition potential. As the rainy season continues to compress, we have tinder-dry fuel conditions, which are easily ignitable that overlap with high wind events in the winter and spring that did not previously pose a risk of fire. Because we're not going to engage in a managed retreat from fire pro fire prone areas, we're forced with a binary decision to adapt or not. Maintaining the status quo will continue to result in similar outcomes. All these fires and many more took advantage of key vulnerabilities in the communities that enabled devastating fire behavior, resulting in catastrophic structure loss, injuries, and death. These vulnerabilities are well known, scientifically supported and field tested in communities across the West, many with similar topography, vegetation, and climate conditions to the East Bay. The state of California experienced experiences about 8,000 wildfires a year. Many of them occur under far less extreme conditions than we saw in Los Angeles. We know that fire will inevitably impact Berkeley Hills, the Berkeley Hills again, as it has approximately every 20 years, with the last major fire occurring over 30 years ago now in 1991. Common public engagement over the last four years has often revolved around a compromise. Sorry, over the last four months as we've evolved this process has often revolved around a compromise between defensible space and home hardening, allowing flexibility to improve compliance. If I have a hardened structure, do I still need to pull my chamellias?