OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Berkeley, California/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Berkeley City Council Regular Meeting - September 15, 2026

City Council — Tuesday, September 15, 2026
BodyBerkeley, California
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, September 15, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 5:02:07

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:00

Where the control of these things uh comes into play and how it's really not really rogue alien species, digital species, um, but really it's just software programs.

0:12

And for example, to take the instance of the hugging face thing, which was presented as if it was a uh a civilization of AI agents that went rogue to hack into this company.

0:22

What in reality happened was that the open AI basically uh was very reckless with how it programmed those AI agents.

0:31

And so what ended up happening is they did not put in uh very standard common sense uh protocols for how you would control um the function of these AI agents, and they defined the objective that the AI agents were doing.

0:44

And so, and then they let it run wild without uh these standard, you know, reasonable regulations of how the AI agents would function.

0:53

And so then right, you can see how it wasn't it's not these you know, an AI agent civilization that's going rogue with malintent to destroy humanity, it's actually completely uh reckless behavior by the tech companies to unleash these technologies um with reckless abandon, basically.

1:13

Um, it's not unlike how the railroad companies and trying to cut costs, uh, you know, you leads to the rail disaster in East Palestine, Ohio, right?

1:23

Or the oil companies uh cutting costs and recklessly doing all these things leading to the deep water uh horizon disaster.

1:30

In that sense, it's really corporate irresponsibility driven by capitalist competition for profits.

1:37

Um that's really subjecting all rational considerations of human safety, societal well-being to that profit motive, and they're gonna chase that uh no matter what and at all costs.

1:49

But it really the responsibility lies ultimately in the control the the the billionaires and the corporations that are are driving this technology.

1:58

Um I will say uh just to put one last point on this.

2:03

The technology is very powerful and to the point of what is exactly recursive self-improvement.

2:08

So this is the notion that the tick the AI models could improve themselves iteratively um without any uh programming from engineers, human engineers.

2:18

Um and this is still kind of a theoretical concept, and it's really honestly openly debated whether uh how realistic this notion is uh to really break out of the paradigm in which humans are setting the you know, programming the software.

2:34

Um, and like that's still the standard way that all these AI agents work.

2:38

And so, in a in a sense, it's again posing these long-term theoretical crises uh revolution move compromise.

2:52

Revolution overturns and destroy everything that's getting Liz Farella, I watch free speech TV to get the truth and to get a wide range of information on many subjects the money might not see it coming.

4:02

It's pre-diabetes, and it captures one in three adults, but you can escape.

4:08

Take the one-minute pre-diabetes risk test to know where you stand and prevent or delay type two diabetes.

4:16

Be your own hero on smartphones everywhere.

4:19

Uh, do I have pre-diabetes.org.

4:23

Mom, mom, come hurry.

4:25

Yeah, we're boy.

4:31

Why are you so sweet?

4:35

I love you.

4:36

I love you too.

4:40

See?

4:46

Mom, I got in.

4:47

I got in all.

4:53

I can't celebrate the best moment of my life because I kidnapped my mom.

4:58

They took my husband in the middle of the street.

13:35

Unique partnership between the National Lab, our university, our downtown business association, our Chamber of Commerce, and of course, the City of Berkeley, to our brick and mortar establishments nestled in our diverse commercial districts.

13:47

Our office is here to support accessing the city services and celebrating their service to our community.

15:00

So thank you again for honoring nurturing this group, and we really appreciate the spirit tonight.

15:48

Okay, so for our second proclamation this evening, um we have recognizing September 2026 as hunger action month.

15:58

Uh Councilmember Bartley, did you want to read this proclamation?

16:04

So I think that Andrew Crisman from Berkeley Food Network is here.

16:09

Yes, would you like to come up and receive it?

16:12

And this was requested by Councilmember Bartlett's office.

16:17

Thank you so much.

16:18

Happy birthday.

16:23

Approach.

16:28

Recognizing September 2026 as Hunger Action Month, whereas the City of Berkeley recognizes September as National Hunger Action Month, a nationwide effort to raise awareness and inspire action to address food insecurity and hunger in our communities.

16:43

And whereas external factors such as federal legislation in conjunction with the high cost of living, especially of food in the Bay Area, have exacerbated food insecurity.

16:53

Individuals experiencing poverty must often choose between vital expenses, including rent, health care, and food.

17:01

And whereas the city of Berkeley acknowledges the struggle of individuals and families in our community experiencing food insecurity and hunger, we encourage our residents on a helping hand by supporting one of the community organizations in our city working to create greater food sovereignty by volunteering their time and treasure.

17:19

And whereas the work of groups such as the Berkeley Food Network, the Basic Needs Food Pantry, Inside Housing, formerly known as the Berkeley Food and Housing Project, Resourcery Org, and Village of Love, as well as all their volunteers and supporters, are critical to the ability of everyone in our community to thrive.

17:37

And whereas these organizations and countless other organizations, mutual aid organizations, and caring individuals provide direct services, food, and other resources for those in our community who need it.

17:50

Now therefore we resolved that the mayor Adina Ishi, on her birthday, no less, Mayor of the City of Berkeley does hereby recognize September 2026 as Hunger Action Month in the City of Berkeley.

18:00

You're here.

18:06

City Council, Mayor, audience here.

18:09

My name is Andrew Crispin.

18:10

I'm the executive director of Berkeley Food Network, and I am so honored to be in a community where we recognize food as a basic right and are taking action to make sure our neighbors are fed.

18:19

Thank you for this recognition.

18:47

Thank you, Councilmember, for bringing that up for our uh for uh proclamation this evening.

18:54

Okay, we are now moving on to city manager comments, and um I think our city auditor is also here.

19:01

Oh, yes, and then after we will have our city auditor.

19:04

Okay, thank you, Madam Mayor.

19:06

I'd like to make a few comments about the Harrison Street encampment, uh the corridor and the potential community impacts.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Comment█████████████████████21%
Procedural████████████████████20%
Public Safety█████████████████17%
Police Accountability█████████████████17%
Homelessness██████████10%
Public Engagement███3%
Technology and Innovation██2%
Environmental Protection██2%
Personnel Matters█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Berkeley City Council Regular Meeting

The Berkeley City Council held its regular meeting on Tuesday, September 15, 2026, at the School District Board Room, 1231 Addison Street, Berkeley, CA, with in-person and remote participation. The agenda included consent calendar approvals, a whistleblower program report on workplace relationship policies, a referral analyzing housing-related fees, and a significant discussion on the potential reinstatement of tear gas use by the Berkeley Police Department. Extensive public comment reflected deep community division, particularly over the tear gas proposal.

Consent Calendar

  • Item 4 (Formal Bid Solicitations and Request for Proposals): A resolution approving expenditures not to exceed $65,000 from the FY 2026-27 office budget of District 1 Councilmember Rashi Kesarwani to provide a one-time capacity building grant.
  • Item 14 (Whistleblower Program Special Report): The report found that Berkeley's current workplace relationship policies do not address romantic dating or cohabitating relationships when they intersect with hiring, supervision, and other employment decisions. The consent item recommended that the Council ask the City Manager to implement recommendations one and two, consistent with the management response, and refer recommendation three to the Agenda and Rules Committee.
  • Item 15 (Shelter/Housing Investment): A district investment referenced in public comment as connected to the Shelter Plus Care program; one speaker urged the Council to pass the item, describing the state of unsheltered residents as a humanitarian and environmental crisis.
  • Item 16 (Referral for Housing Fees Report): A referral directing staff to prepare an information report assessing all housing-related impact, development, and local parcel tax fees, including a summary of categories, amounts, and the bases for calculating fees across all cities in the matrix, to better understand the true and total costs of developing housing of all types in Berkeley.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Multiple speakers opposed reinstating tear gas, calling it a "chemical weapon" and urging the Council not to "green light chemical weapons, even if they're following their own rules, it's not safe." One speaker described encounters with tear gas deployed in residential neighborhoods during protests and argued the risk is higher than officials acknowledged. Another speaker criticized the Council: "Not a single one reported on all the people who were injured in the streets."
  • A speaker urged the Council to pull an item off the consent calendar, asking them to read the contract carefully with someone who understands Article 1, Section 1 of the California Constitution, arguing the agreement could allow the government to "stockpile information" about private individuals.
  • A speaker stated that the Shelter Plus Care program "didn't pay their portion of the rent" and criticized the city for managing an unsheltered crisis "without a sanctioned encampment."
  • A resident of Evans Manor, owned by the Berkeley Student Cooperative, reported going to the Rent Board without help and requested that the Council establish a commission addressing issues at their building.
  • A speaker expressed opposition to building large surface parking lots on prime waterfront land.
  • Several speakers raised police accountability concerns, including that lawsuit payouts come from the general fund rather than the police budget, and one speaker declared that organizers "plan to flip the Berkeley City Council" over the tear gas vote.
  • One speaker raised a procedural question about when public comment would be taken on the City Manager's report, noting the current comment period was limited to consent calendar and information items.

Discussion Items

  • Tear Gas / Chemical Agent Policy (referenced as item 21A): The Council received a presentation from the Police Department describing three specific situations in which tear gas could be authorized if feasible: issuing verbal warnings, taking steps to secure suspects in a controlled area, and attempting to establish communication with a barricaded individual before deployment. The chief noted that negotiators would evaluate whether efforts were succeeding and assess other risks before deploying. Council members acknowledged the public's deep concern, with one noting, "I think this is the main concern that a lot of us have up here," and another stating that even a clear future argument to lift the ban would be difficult. Councilmembers thanked the Public Safety Policy Committee, the police chief, deputy chief, and captain for their work on the item.
  • The Council noted a discrepancy in a submitted memorandum from Councilmembers Kesarwani, Ishii, and Humbert: it included "version one" of a bike lane design from the April 15 committee meeting rather than the version currently under discussion.
  • District 1 Councilmember Rashi Kesarwani expressed pride in hosting two Home Key sites and in co-sponsoring a resolution opposing coal introduced by Councilmember Trago.

Key Outcomes

  • The Council received extensive public testimony on the tear gas item and conducted deliberation; the transcript does not include a recorded vote or final action on this item.
  • Several public requests were made to pull items from the consent calendar, including the privacy/contract item and items relating to the Shelter Plus Care program; the transcript does not record the Council's final votes on those requests.
  • The Council heard the whistleblower report recommending implementation of two of the three workplace relationship policy recommendations, with the third referred to the Agenda and Rules Committee. A management response was noted as consistent with recommendations one and two.

Note: The transcript is partial and does not contain complete vote tallies or the full record of actions for all agenda items; this summary reflects information available in the agenda, minutes, and transcript provided.

Meeting Transcript

Where the control of these things uh comes into play and how it's really not really rogue alien species, digital species, um, but really it's just software programs. And for example, to take the instance of the hugging face thing, which was presented as if it was a uh a civilization of AI agents that went rogue to hack into this company. What in reality happened was that the open AI basically uh was very reckless with how it programmed those AI agents. And so what ended up happening is they did not put in uh very standard common sense uh protocols for how you would control um the function of these AI agents, and they defined the objective that the AI agents were doing. And so, and then they let it run wild without uh these standard, you know, reasonable regulations of how the AI agents would function. And so then right, you can see how it wasn't it's not these you know, an AI agent civilization that's going rogue with malintent to destroy humanity, it's actually completely uh reckless behavior by the tech companies to unleash these technologies um with reckless abandon, basically. Um, it's not unlike how the railroad companies and trying to cut costs, uh, you know, you leads to the rail disaster in East Palestine, Ohio, right? Or the oil companies uh cutting costs and recklessly doing all these things leading to the deep water uh horizon disaster. In that sense, it's really corporate irresponsibility driven by capitalist competition for profits. Um that's really subjecting all rational considerations of human safety, societal well-being to that profit motive, and they're gonna chase that uh no matter what and at all costs. But it really the responsibility lies ultimately in the control the the the billionaires and the corporations that are are driving this technology. Um I will say uh just to put one last point on this. The technology is very powerful and to the point of what is exactly recursive self-improvement. So this is the notion that the tick the AI models could improve themselves iteratively um without any uh programming from engineers, human engineers. Um and this is still kind of a theoretical concept, and it's really honestly openly debated whether uh how realistic this notion is uh to really break out of the paradigm in which humans are setting the you know, programming the software. Um, and like that's still the standard way that all these AI agents work. And so, in a in a sense, it's again posing these long-term theoretical crises uh revolution move compromise. Revolution overturns and destroy everything that's getting Liz Farella, I watch free speech TV to get the truth and to get a wide range of information on many subjects the money might not see it coming. It's pre-diabetes, and it captures one in three adults, but you can escape. Take the one-minute pre-diabetes risk test to know where you stand and prevent or delay type two diabetes. Be your own hero on smartphones everywhere. Uh, do I have pre-diabetes.org. Mom, mom, come hurry. Yeah, we're boy. Why are you so sweet? I love you. I love you too. See? Mom, I got in. I got in all. I can't celebrate the best moment of my life because I kidnapped my mom. They took my husband in the middle of the street. Unique partnership between the National Lab, our university, our downtown business association, our Chamber of Commerce, and of course, the City of Berkeley, to our brick and mortar establishments nestled in our diverse commercial districts. Our office is here to support accessing the city services and celebrating their service to our community. So thank you again for honoring nurturing this group, and we really appreciate the spirit tonight. Okay, so for our second proclamation this evening, um we have recognizing September 2026 as hunger action month. Uh Councilmember Bartley, did you want to read this proclamation? So I think that Andrew Crisman from Berkeley Food Network is here. Yes, would you like to come up and receive it? And this was requested by Councilmember Bartlett's office. Thank you so much. Happy birthday. Approach. Recognizing September 2026 as Hunger Action Month, whereas the City of Berkeley recognizes September as National Hunger Action Month, a nationwide effort to raise awareness and inspire action to address food insecurity and hunger in our communities. And whereas external factors such as federal legislation in conjunction with the high cost of living, especially of food in the Bay Area, have exacerbated food insecurity. Individuals experiencing poverty must often choose between vital expenses, including rent, health care, and food. And whereas the city of Berkeley acknowledges the struggle of individuals and families in our community experiencing food insecurity and hunger, we encourage our residents on a helping hand by supporting one of the community organizations in our city working to create greater food sovereignty by volunteering their time and treasure. And whereas the work of groups such as the Berkeley Food Network, the Basic Needs Food Pantry, Inside Housing, formerly known as the Berkeley Food and Housing Project, Resourcery Org, and Village of Love, as well as all their volunteers and supporters, are critical to the ability of everyone in our community to thrive. And whereas these organizations and countless other organizations, mutual aid organizations, and caring individuals provide direct services, food, and other resources for those in our community who need it. Now therefore we resolved that the mayor Adina Ishi, on her birthday, no less, Mayor of the City of Berkeley does hereby recognize September 2026 as Hunger Action Month in the City of Berkeley.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com