The July 13, 2026 regular business meeting of the Billings, Montana City Council was called to order at 5:30 p.m. The meeting included apologies and clarifications regarding remarks made at the previous meeting, updates from community organizations, a presentation on the upcoming air show, a work session on amendments to the Billings 2045 plan, and public comments on various topics.
13th, 2026, regular business meeting of the Billings, Montana City Council. I'm happy you are all here. It is now officially 5:30 p.m., so I am calling the meeting to order. Would everybody please rise and join me in the Pledge of Allegiance? I of the United States of America. I'll like for which is so I thought I'd try something a little different for the invocation. Um have us do kind of a short, I'll call it a meditation for lack of a better word on the word leadership. So we'll just kind of have a moment of silence for about 30 seconds, and I'd just like everybody to reflect on that word, and then I'll call us to a close. By the way, um are we ready? Let's call the roll. Nicholson, niece present here, Tegieray here, Kennedy, Aspenlighter, Lindley, here, Boyette, O'Donnell. Here, Mayor Nelson. I'm present. Thank you. We have minutes uh for approval of June 22nd, 2026. Could we have a motion to uh accept the minutes? Mr. Boyette. Thank you, Mayor. I move that we approve the minutes for June 22nd, 2026 is read. Thank you. Uh is there a second, Mr. Nees. Any changes or discussion regarding the motion? All right, seeing none, uh, shall we vote? All those in favor accepting the minutes, please say aye. Aye. Aye. All those opposed. That's unanimous. Council courtesies. I think we're gonna start with Mr. O'Donnell. Thank you. Uh, so I have a uh statement to make to the community at large. I wish to offer an apology to any persons who were upset by remarks that I made during the July 6th council meeting. While the remarks I made are truly recorded, one very important fact has not been noticed or overlooked, and that is that the words uh that were read by me uh were read directly from the official packet of information prepared for the October 13, 2025 council meeting. These words were not my own. The wording that said this project had a quote unquote target population that was defined not by income but by race, that was uh this was understood by me as highly offensive and objectionable and unacceptable. It is true today and has always been true that my convictions are completely anti-racist. I have never, will never tolerate or support any program that uses race as a deciding or determining factor, such as I mistakenly thought this project was using. This language, and thank you to Councilmember Aguirre for explaining this to me, referencing target populations. I have discovered is a rather common language in federal contracts, and does not in any way mean that anybody's race is meant to be targeted in a negative way. Um I used a word that many find very offensive, ghettoization, and indeed it is very offensive, an ugly word. I use that word intentionally to convey my disgust with the racism that I mistakenly thought was going to happen in this program. It is an ugly word. I could not imagine any other meaning of those contract words other than that people of those quote unquote target populations were targeted to be directed to this development. What else could targeting mean? I hope that anyone who pays attention to this clarification and still thinks ill of my words will reach out to me. I will meet and discuss this with anyone.