OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Bismarck City Commission Meeting - February 24, 2026

City CommissionTuesday, February 24, 2026
BodyBismarck, North Dakota
SessionCity Commission
DateTuesday, February 24, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:49:14

Transcript — Verbatim
0:10

515 on February 24th.

0:12

We're in the Tom Baker room of the City County Building.

0:15

This will be the Board of City Commissioners meeting.

0:17

However, before we start, if Chaplain Staten would be able to come forward and give us invocation and lead us in the Pledge of Allegiance.

0:25

Father, we come before you today at Thanksgiving.

0:29

We're thankful we live in North Dakota, which you have blessed bountifully.

0:36

All of the uh oil, gas, minerals, and uh the farmland, the cattle, livestock, we're just praise you that we can live here.

0:48

And we thank you for your abundant blessings.

0:51

We ask today for protection for our law enforcement, our fireman, emergency responders.

1:01

Uh we be with them today.

1:03

We pray for our commissioners today, give them wisdom and discernment as they make decisions concerning our city, and uh we just ask you to bless this meeting, and God bless America.

1:26

I pledge allegiance to the United States of America Republic for which it stands under our indivisible liberty and justice.

1:40

Thank you, sir.

1:45

If we can call the meeting order, call roll, please.

1:49

Commissioner Rish.

1:50

Here.

1:50

Commissioner Zenker?

1:52

Here.

1:52

Commissioner Connolly?

1:53

Here.

1:53

Commissioner Cleary?

1:54

Here, Mayor Smith.

1:56

Here.

1:57

Our first item is public comment.

1:59

Public comment is uh restricted to the items on the consent agenda, the regular agenda or prior city commission agenda for the regular agenda to be excluding any public hearings.

2:10

So anyone who wishes to speak, please come forward, state your name, sign in, and tell us which topic you're speaking to.

2:58

You can bring it down.

2:59

Bring it down.

3:00

Okay.

3:01

Perfect.

3:01

Thank you.

3:02

You're used to be on this side of the table.

3:06

Umers, thank you for uh allowing me to uh this time to share my thoughts with you this evening.

3:16

Just for the record, state your name.

3:17

Oh, I will.

3:18

My name is Mike Schwartz.

3:19

And uh by way of introduction, uh I'm a longtime resident of Bismarck.

3:24

My folks moved here in 1968.

3:26

Um my wife Connie tells me, reminds me that uh we're going to have lived in our house on First Street for 40 years here in May.

3:35

So been around for a while.

3:37

I'm an Eagle Scout, uh, which uh, if nothing else signifies to you my dedication to uh public service.

3:45

I've uh served two terms on the Bismarck Park Board, and as Mayor Schmitz knows, I am uh starting my 14th year on uh planning and zoning as a volunteer.

3:56

So I I volunteer um as a as a service to you on planning and zoning and to the citizens of Bismarck, and I I thank you all for uh for the service that you provide provide to Bismarck.

4:10

The item that I'm here to visit with you this evening is the last uh item on your uh agenda from your February 10th meeting, which is the uh street utility and maintenance fee.

4:23

And I just wanted to let you know that um I'm here this evening because I oppose the replacement of the existing special assessments and uh moving it over onto the utility bill.

4:38

And uh the reason I do that is because I believe that the current special assessment fee process allows the citizens of Bismarck a voice in that process.

4:49

They're notified when uh there is a street project going on next to their property.

5:00

And then addition to that, they have the opportunity to protest it if they so choose to do that.

5:08

And you know, it it to me it encourages public participation in the process.

5:14

And it uh it allows people that are paying paying for the project to actually have a voice in what's being done.

5:25

Um I think that um the current um change, the possibility of a street utility fee is has really has two problems.

5:37

First of all, it's a bucket that uh just accumulates dollars and can be used by you know whenever wherever city administration sees fit with really out much without much citizen input.

5:53

And then secondly, in addition to that, the the other issue I see is that the charge for that fee can be bumped up without any city input.

6:07

So our citizen input, it comes to you, I would expect, and that you will uh decide how much it's going to be increased.

6:16

Now we currently have something very similar in place, and that is the uh street light and uh and uh signal light um traffic light fee that's currently in place.

6:33

And since its inception, and I don't remember when that was because I know it's been on my bill for quite a while, uh I've noticed in the last two years it's gone up five dollars a year, so ten bucks, and that's for commercial property, and four dollars for um for residential.

6:53

And it I I find it interesting that uh when I watched the uh the uh city commission meeting, and it would have been back in 23, um, I don't remember exactly when, I think sometime mid-year, where public works came to you and asked you for a contract to uh finish putting the street lights in, uh the LED street lights.

7:19

And one of the things actually there were three things that were asked.

7:24

First of all, um how much had been spent putting street lights in so far, and there really wasn't an answer for it, and then how efficient, how much was being saved by putting in LED street lights, and there wasn't an answer for that that I remember.

7:42

And then finally, how much the contract was going to be to uh complete the project, and I don't remember that there was an answer for that either.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Engineering And Infrastructure█████████████████████████████29%
Public Engagement██████████████████18%
Food Security█████████████13%
Parks and Recreation███████████11%
Procedural███████7%
Property Assessment█████5%
Community Engagement████4%
Economic Development███3%
Fiscal Sustainability██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Bismarck City Commission Meeting - February 24, 2026

The Bismarck Board of City Commissioners met on February 24, 2026, in the Tom Baker Room of the City County Building. The meeting included a public comment period, approval of consent agenda items, several public hearings, and discussions on the half-cent sales tax extension, street utility fee advisory vote, community recreation facility feasibility study, and a request from the Great Plains Food Bank. The commission voted to conduct a scientific survey on the street utility fee concept rather than an advisory vote.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved the consent agenda (Commissioner Risch pulled item D3 for separate discussion).
  • Item D3 (letter of support for SDY Dental loan buy-down): After debate, the commission voted 3-2 to approve the letter of support. (Commissioners Cleary, Zenker, Mayor Smith in favor; Commissioners Connolly, Risch opposed.)

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Mike Schwartz (longtime Bismarck resident, Planning & Zoning volunteer): Opposed replacing special assessments with a monthly street utility fee. Argued that special assessments allow citizen input and protest rights, while a utility fee creates an unaccountable "bucket of dollars" that can be increased without direct citizen input. Expressed concern that the fee would cost him more than current special assessments, citing his own property calculations. Urged the commission to abandon the concept.
  • Ms. Frank (property owner in SI594): Supported street improvements but raised concerns about how costs are commingled across different units in the special assessment district. Stated that her unit (Unit 3) would pay less if assessed separately. Acknowledged that the engineering department agreed the policy deserves review.
  • Raquel Richter (social worker, Ministry on the Margins): Shared stories of individuals unable to access jobs, medical appointments, or housing due to lack of transportation. Requested that the commission consider an application process for agencies to receive funding for bus passes or transportation vouchers from the half-cent sales tax dedicated to public transportation. Estimated $5,400 for 150 passes.

Discussion Items

  • Public Hearings (Items A-G): Approved without discussion: C1 alcohol license for Adava Bismarck Hospitality (Item A); annexation of lots in Promontory Point 6th Edition (Item B); zoning map amendments for Cottonwood Park View and Edgewood Village (Items C & D); street name change from El Rancho Road to Golf Drive (Item E); insufficiency of protests for SI594 (Item F); award of contract for traffic signal replacement at Main Avenue and Airport Road (Item G, $588,764 to Denny's Electric).
  • Great Plains Food Bank Request (Item H): Marcia Paulson (Chief Development Officer) and Grace Renner (Donor Relations Officer) presented data: 2.354 million pounds of food distributed in Bismarck last year, 1.2 million volunteer hours, 22 partner agencies. Requested $50,000 annually for five years starting 2027, which would provide 100,000 meals per year with a 4.5:1 return on investment. Commissioners expressed mixed views on whether direct funding of charitable organizations is a proper government role. No decision made; will be considered during budget discussions.
  • Community Recreation Facility Feasibility Study (Item I): Jason (city staff) proposed partnering with Bismarck Parks and Recreation District to conduct a $200,000–$250,000 study, with the city sharing half the cost. Commissioner Zenker questioned whether a new study is needed, noting past studies and a failed 2020 ballot measure. Commissioner Risch expressed reservations about cost and timing, citing other major projects in queue. Commissioner Cleary suggested narrowing the scope and waiting for the Park District to weigh in (their meeting is March 19). Consensus to have staff work with the Park District to refine scope and return at the second March meeting.
  • Half-Cent Sales Tax Extension Project List and Ballot Language (Item J): City Engineer Gabe presented a revised 10-year extension project list, including changes based on public feedback: removal of 64th Avenue extension, addition of 1804/71st Avenue corridor and Yukon Drive extension. Commissioners generally supported the list. Discussion on ballot language for a home rule charter amendment to be placed on the June ballot. The commission directed staff to proceed with finalizing the project list and bring back formal ballot language.
  • Street Utility Fee Advisory Vote Language (Item K): Gabe presented four versions of an advisory vote question for the June ballot. Commissioner Risch advocated for a scientific survey instead, arguing it would provide more detailed feedback (e.g., fee tolerance levels) and allow questions on other topics like the recreation facility. Commissioner Zenker noted the need for direction and efficiency. After debate, a motion passed 5-0 to conduct a scientific survey of Bismarck residents to gauge support for replacing street maintenance special assessments with a utility fee. Staff will develop survey questions, ensuring they are fair and address issues like citizen input and checks and balances.
  • Half-Cent Sales Tax Allocation for Public Transportation (Item L): Commissioner Connolly introduced a proposal to create an application process for entities to request funding from the half-cent sales tax dedicated to public transportation. Ministry on the Margins presented their need. Discussion turned to whether the transit authority should administer the process rather than the city. Commissioners agreed that transit is better equipped to handle distribution, and the city staff will ask the transit board to explore options.

Key Outcomes

  • Final Decisions:
    • Approved letter of support for SDY Dental (3-2).
    • Approved all consent agenda items as amended.
    • Approved all public hearing items (A-G) unanimously.
    • Directed staff to conduct a scientific survey on the street utility fee concept (5-0).
  • Directives:
    • Staff to work with Parks & Recreation District to narrow scope of recreation facility feasibility study and report back at the second March meeting.
    • Staff to finalize project list and ballot language for the half-cent sales tax extension, to be presented at the second March meeting.
    • Transit authority to be asked to develop a mechanism for funding transportation vouchers from the half-cent sales tax.
  • Future Actions:
    • Great Plains Food Bank request to be discussed during 2027 budget planning.
    • Contract negotiations with Oak View Group (OVG) for event center management continue; OVG site visit scheduled for March 9.
    • Joint powers agreement with Burley County for Missouri Valley Fairgrounds to be finalized by end of March.

Meeting Transcript

515 on February 24th. We're in the Tom Baker room of the City County Building. This will be the Board of City Commissioners meeting. However, before we start, if Chaplain Staten would be able to come forward and give us invocation and lead us in the Pledge of Allegiance. Father, we come before you today at Thanksgiving. We're thankful we live in North Dakota, which you have blessed bountifully. All of the uh oil, gas, minerals, and uh the farmland, the cattle, livestock, we're just praise you that we can live here. And we thank you for your abundant blessings. We ask today for protection for our law enforcement, our fireman, emergency responders. Uh we be with them today. We pray for our commissioners today, give them wisdom and discernment as they make decisions concerning our city, and uh we just ask you to bless this meeting, and God bless America. I pledge allegiance to the United States of America Republic for which it stands under our indivisible liberty and justice. Thank you, sir. If we can call the meeting order, call roll, please. Commissioner Rish. Here. Commissioner Zenker? Here. Commissioner Connolly? Here. Commissioner Cleary? Here, Mayor Smith. Here. Our first item is public comment. Public comment is uh restricted to the items on the consent agenda, the regular agenda or prior city commission agenda for the regular agenda to be excluding any public hearings. So anyone who wishes to speak, please come forward, state your name, sign in, and tell us which topic you're speaking to. You can bring it down. Bring it down. Okay. Perfect. Thank you. You're used to be on this side of the table. Umers, thank you for uh allowing me to uh this time to share my thoughts with you this evening. Just for the record, state your name. Oh, I will. My name is Mike Schwartz. And uh by way of introduction, uh I'm a longtime resident of Bismarck. My folks moved here in 1968. Um my wife Connie tells me, reminds me that uh we're going to have lived in our house on First Street for 40 years here in May. So been around for a while. I'm an Eagle Scout, uh, which uh, if nothing else signifies to you my dedication to uh public service. I've uh served two terms on the Bismarck Park Board, and as Mayor Schmitz knows, I am uh starting my 14th year on uh planning and zoning as a volunteer. So I I volunteer um as a as a service to you on planning and zoning and to the citizens of Bismarck, and I I thank you all for uh for the service that you provide provide to Bismarck. The item that I'm here to visit with you this evening is the last uh item on your uh agenda from your February 10th meeting, which is the uh street utility and maintenance fee. And I just wanted to let you know that um I'm here this evening because I oppose the replacement of the existing special assessments and uh moving it over onto the utility bill. And uh the reason I do that is because I believe that the current special assessment fee process allows the citizens of Bismarck a voice in that process. They're notified when uh there is a street project going on next to their property. And then addition to that, they have the opportunity to protest it if they so choose to do that. And you know, it it to me it encourages public participation in the process. And it uh it allows people that are paying paying for the project to actually have a voice in what's being done.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com