OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Bloomington, Indiana/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Council Processes Committee Meeting - September 29, 2026: Removal Process, Title II Review, and Training

City Council — Tuesday, September 29, 2026
BodyBloomington, Indiana
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, September 29, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:30:19

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Unassigned speaker

0:01

We'll

Speaker 1

0:01

go ahead and call to order this

Speaker 2

0:04

meeting of the committee on council processes for Monday, September 28th, 2026.

0:11

Let's just go around the table, see who's here.

0:13

Start with my left.

0:15

Jennifer Crossley, Clerk's office.

0:17

And I'm Isabel Piedmont Smith, Chair of the Committee, City Council, District 1.

Speaker 3

0:22

Hope East Oscar, District 3.

Speaker 4

0:25

Courtney Daly, City Council, District 5.

0:27

So he is overing city council district six.

Speaker 2

0:33

All right.

0:35

So the agenda for today includes discussion of the possible expansion of the Bloomington Public Transportation Board.

0:46

Developing a process for removal of Order Commission members.

0:51

Improved training on Robert's rules of order for boards and commissions, which that may be short because it was brought to my attention.

0:59

That's not actually the purview of this committee, but we can touch on

Unassigned speaker

1:02

it.

Speaker 2

1:03

And then we have our ongoing review of Title II.

1:07

And we'll have public comment at the end to cover everything in the meeting.

1:13

Are there any additions or concerns about the agenda?

1:20

Okay.

1:24

So let's move right into the possible expansion of the Bloomington Public Transportation Board.

1:29

And Hopi, I think you were gonna look into this.

Speaker 3

2:00

So have a penciled in for me to go to their meeting to have a conversation with them about it in October.

Unassigned speaker

2:06

And

Speaker 3

2:06

that's about where we're at with it.

2:07

Like there's not really uh uh conclusion or uh or a memo or a proposal or anything like that at this point.

2:14

It's just still in the in the research phases, but it's uh going.

Speaker 1

2:21

Thank you.

Speaker 3

2:23

Thank you to the fellow who did that research and then is continuing to follow up with some other questions that I had about it.

2:29

So

Speaker 2

2:30

is that Michael or Evan?

2:32

Michael.

2:33

They have names, you

Unassigned speaker

2:34

know.

Unassigned speaker

2:35

I know.

Speaker 2

2:37

Thank you to Michael.

Speaker 1

2:39

Okay, um

Speaker 2

2:43

next we have developing a process for removal of board and commission members.

2:48

And this came up um because of the proposal to remove a member of the HPC.

2:55

Um Sydney and I are both on that interview committee, so we had a meeting last week about this.

3:01

And um, and with Larry as well.

Unassigned speaker

3:05

And

Speaker 2

3:05

Jennifer.

3:06

And Jennifer was there.

3:07

Yeah, a lot of the same folks.

3:16

And um my big takeaway from that is that we need a process.

3:21

Um, because it was kind of it came about in a way that not all council members understood why this was coming

Unassigned speaker

3:31

about.

Speaker 5

3:33

Um

Speaker 2

3:34

maybe Larry can just quickly summarize for uh those who weren't here last Thursday, how it did come about that somebody was recommended for removal.

Speaker 6

3:44

Uh yeah, sure.

3:46

Um so essentially this came out.

3:48

There was a start at the beginning, there was a contentious uh historic preservation commission meeting that had a lot of public interest.

3:56

Uh you know, in typically for contentious meetings, we expect uh people are very invested in that, and so you get very passionate about that.

4:05

That was actually that happened in um was that June?

4:10

June.

4:10

That was in June of this year.

4:13

There were two subsequent meetings after that.

4:15

So the item in question that was very controversial, which is about uh housing uh related to the convention center and knocking down potential housing and the demolition, whether the HBC could do a demolition delay.

4:27

That was that was not on the agenda any further.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Personnel Matters███████████████████████████27%
Procedural███████████████████████23%
Legal Affairs██████████████████████22%
Public Engagement████████████████████20%
Public Safety████4%
Historic Preservation███3%
Public Transportation█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Council Processes Committee Meeting - September 29, 2026

Note: The transcript identifies the meeting as Monday, September 28, 2026, but the provided timestamp is September 29, 2026. This summary uses the provided date.

The Committee on Council Processes met on September 29, 2026, chaired by Council Member Isabel Piedmont Smith (District 1). Also present were Council Members Hopi East (District 3), Courtney Daly (District 5), and So heis Overing (District 6), along with Deputy Clerk Jennifer Crossley and City Attorney Larry Allen. The agenda included discussion of the possible expansion of the Bloomington Public Transportation Board, developing a removal process for board and commission members, improved training on Robert's Rules of Order, and ongoing review of Title II of the city code.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Terry Amsler, a Bloomington resident, spoke in person. He mentioned an upcoming Indiana Municipalities summit on consensus-building, Robert's Rules resources (including alternatives), a potential IU capstone project on boards and commissions, and the Monroe County Health Equity Coalition's name change. He expressed general support for the committee's work.
  • Eric Ghost, participating online, argued that categorizing removal of appointed board members as "for cause" creates a constitutionally protected property interest. He stressed that removal must include procedural due process, detailed written notice, full disclosure of evidence, and a meaningful hearing before the full council. He also called for codifying how points of order are raised and addressed, and noted that resignations from the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) resulted from process failures at the June 25, 2026 meeting.

Discussion Items

  • Expansion of the Bloomington Public Transportation Board: Council Member East reported that the item is still in the research phase; he is scheduled to attend a board meeting in October to gather more information. No conclusions or proposals were presented.
  • Developing a Process for Removal of Board and Commission Members: City Attorney Larry Allen summarized the case of Mr. Cross, an HPC advisory member, whose behavior at two meetings (July 9 and July 23, 2026) led to recommendations for removal. Issues included delaying meetings, rudeness to the chair, and potential open door law violations. The committee discussed whether to route complaints through council leadership or the relevant interview committee, and whether to require the interview committee to meet first. After extensive debate, the committee directed staff (Larry Allen and Jennifer Crossley) to draft a formal removal process proposal for review at the next meeting. Key points included ensuring due process (notice, opportunity to respond), cutting unnecessary steps, and balancing transparency with efficiency.
  • Improved Training on Robert's Rules of Order for Boards and Commissions: Deputy Clerk Crossley shared materials from a June training session. The committee agreed that detailed Robert's Rules training is not within its purview, but suggested providing cheat sheets or optional resources. The clerk's office indicated it would work with legal to develop or adapt training materials for chairs and members.
  • Title II Review: The committee reviewed several sections of Title II:
    • Intentional Display of Firearms (2.04.225): Members questioned the legality and placement of the provision under "Committees" rather than "Meetings and Rules of Procedure." It was agreed to move it to the meetings section for broader applicability.
    • Reports from Standing Committees: The current code requires written reports signed by a majority. The committee proposed at least one written report per year, with oral reports as needed, and to remove outdated references to document return.
    • Special Committees: The committee adopted edits to language drafted by Chair Piedmont Smith, adding that a special committee shall give a final report to council and may disband after completing its duties. The provision for continuation by the new council president was retained.

Key Outcomes

  • Staff (City Attorney Larry Allen and Deputy Clerk Jennifer Crossley) were directed to draft a formal process for the removal of board and commission members, addressing complaint intake, investigation, notice, hearing, and council decision. The draft will be presented at the next meeting.
  • The Title II review continued with specific edits: the intentional display of firearms provision to be relocated; standing committee reports to require at least one written annual report; and special committee language updated to include a final report and potential early disbandment.
  • The next committee meeting was scheduled for October 26, 2026.

Note on date discrepancy: The agenda and minutes were unavailable; the transcript indicates the meeting was held on Monday, September 28, 2026, while the provided timestamp is September 29, 2026. This summary reflects the latter date as instructed.

Meeting Transcript

We'll go ahead and call to order this meeting of the committee on council processes for Monday, September 28th, 2026. Let's just go around the table, see who's here. Start with my left. Jennifer Crossley, Clerk's office. And I'm Isabel Piedmont Smith, Chair of the Committee, City Council, District 1. Hope East Oscar, District 3. Courtney Daly, City Council, District 5. So he is overing city council district six. All right. So the agenda for today includes discussion of the possible expansion of the Bloomington Public Transportation Board. Developing a process for removal of Order Commission members. Improved training on Robert's rules of order for boards and commissions, which that may be short because it was brought to my attention. That's not actually the purview of this committee, but we can touch on it. And then we have our ongoing review of Title II. And we'll have public comment at the end to cover everything in the meeting. Are there any additions or concerns about the agenda? Okay. So let's move right into the possible expansion of the Bloomington Public Transportation Board. And Hopi, I think you were gonna look into this. So have a penciled in for me to go to their meeting to have a conversation with them about it in October. And that's about where we're at with it. Like there's not really uh uh conclusion or uh or a memo or a proposal or anything like that at this point. It's just still in the in the research phases, but it's uh going. Thank you. Thank you to the fellow who did that research and then is continuing to follow up with some other questions that I had about it. So is that Michael or Evan? Michael. They have names, you know. I know. Thank you to Michael. Okay, um next we have developing a process for removal of board and commission members. And this came up um because of the proposal to remove a member of the HPC. Um Sydney and I are both on that interview committee, so we had a meeting last week about this. And um, and with Larry as well. And Jennifer. And Jennifer was there. Yeah, a lot of the same folks. And um my big takeaway from that is that we need a process. Um, because it was kind of it came about in a way that not all council members understood why this was coming about. Um maybe Larry can just quickly summarize for uh those who weren't here last Thursday, how it did come about that somebody was recommended for removal.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com