OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Bloomington, Indiana/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Bloomington City Council Public Safety Deliberation Session Two - October 23, 2026

City Council — Friday, October 23, 2026
BodyBloomington, Indiana
SessionCity Council
DateFriday, October 23, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 45:00

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

Everybody and welcome to session two of the city council's um uh um uh public safety deliberation sessions.

0:10

Thank you so much for being here.

0:12

It's going to be a wonderful time.

0:14

So I'll just call this meeting to order.

0:16

Um I I think we have to do the thing where the clerk says that we're all here.

0:20

So um I'll pass to the clerk to call us all in.

0:25

Okay,

Speaker 2

0:25

councilmember Stasberg.

0:27

Here.

0:27

Piedmont Smith.

0:29

Here.

0:29

Zule?

0:30

Here.

0:31

Sorry.

0:32

I'm also here.

0:33

Daily?

0:34

Here.

0:35

Rallo.

Speaker 3

0:36

Here.

Speaker 1

0:38

All right.

0:38

Well, thank you so much for those joining online.

0:40

Um, and we're gonna have lots of breakout things, and and Councilmember Rallo is gonna be leading that, but for now I'm gonna hand over to our okay.

0:50

I'm passing over to Councilmember Stasberg.

0:53

Take it away, ma'am.

Speaker 2

0:55

Thank you so much.

0:56

Welcome everybody.

0:56

I'm so happy to have you guys here tonight for our second uh community conversation and deliberation session on public safety.

1:03

Um if staff could uh maybe get that slideshow up on the screen, that would be great.

1:10

I'm just gonna do a little introduction and then I'm gonna pass it over to a colleague, and then we're gonna there we go.

1:17

Wonderful.

1:18

Um sure.

Unassigned speaker

1:24

Thank

Speaker 2

1:24

you.

1:25

I think that this was the welcome, so I already did that.

1:27

Um so this is our little agenda overview for this evening.

1:31

Um we're starting with this opening presentation uh with myself, and then I'll pass it over to Councilmember Piedmont Smith.

1:37

Uh, we're gonna do some community agreements and a process overview with uh Wyatt Lawson, who's in the back from CGM.

1:44

And then most of our time is gonna be spent having small group deliberative sessions.

1:49

Um each group is gonna be on a different topic.

1:52

Then we'll get reports out from each group at the end, do an exit survey, and talk about next steps for this.

2:00

So, in terms of what we've already done, how many of you came or like watched the video or did the survey or anything like that from the first session?

2:07

Can I just have like a little show of hands?

2:10

Okay, so about half of you.

2:11

So at the first session, we had um uh just kind of general conversation with folks about and and every group talked about the same thing, and it was what makes you feel safe and unsafe in in Bloomington.

2:23

And there was an exit survey, and then in early October there was some follow-up survey kind of recognizing who we connected with in that session and who we did not connect with in that session and trying to reach out with some deliberation to different folks.

2:37

And CJAM uh wrote up a report for us on session one.

2:41

And so, as part of that report, there were some very specific focus points identified that were kind of commonalities between those things.

2:49

And so tonight there's we're highlighting four of those commonalities, and so you can see there's four tables set up.

2:55

So each group is going to be a different one of those topics.

2:59

Don't feel like you have to stay in the topic that you happened to sit down at this evening before we go into the sessions.

3:04

You guys can go to whichever one you want to.

3:07

And that's basically what the session today is about is is within those specific topics.

3:13

How can we seek to make Bloomington a safer place feel like a safer place within those those specific topics?

3:20

Um there will be another report on this session, and then you know, hopefully there'll be some some things that uh we'll learn as city council to guide our decision making, of course, understanding that we're a legislative body and that some of these things are programmatic elements, and sometimes things are you know outside of the wheelhouse of council, but they require maybe some collaboration with other community groups.

3:46

And I think this is slide four, which goes down to my um colleague, Councilmember Piedmont Smith.

Speaker 4

3:54

Thank you.

Speaker 2

3:55

So

Speaker 4

3:56

from the first uh deliberation session in the surveys that we did, uh there were four issues that kind of um came to the forefront.

4:06

Um they're a little bit amorphous, but uh um I hope that uh they are clear enough that you can understand uh the differences, and we'll go into some of these um in few other slides.

4:20

Uh so for one thing, uh we'll call it group A.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Safety█████████████████████████████████████████████56%
Public Engagement█████████████████21%
Community Engagement██████████13%
Homelessness█████6%
Procedural███4%
Summary of Proceedings

Bloomington City Council Public Safety Deliberation Session Two - October 23, 2026

This was the second community deliberation session on public safety hosted by the Bloomington City Council. Approximately half of attendees had also participated in the first session in September. The meeting began with an overview of four focus areas derived from prior feedback: safe and welcoming public spaces, community care and crisis response, public safety response and accountability, and communication and trust. After establishing community agreements, participants divided into small groups for 75 minutes of facilitated discussion. Each group was led by a council member and supported by facilitators from CGM. Following the discussions, each group reported key themes to the full assembly. The meeting concluded with an exit survey and a preview of next steps.

Discussion Items

  • Group A – Safe, Accessible, and Welcoming Public Spaces: Participants discussed how information flows (e.g., about downtown businesses, homelessness) affect perceived safety. They highlighted the need for user-centered design (e.g., fenced playgrounds), consistent lighting, and prioritization of sidewalk investments. Solutions revolved around increased spending, but trade-offs in prioritizing among competing needs were noted.
  • Group B – Community Care, Crisis Response, and Supportive Services: The group quickly identified shelter as the top public safety need, especially for underserved groups (people with pets, couples, women, sex offenders, those with behavioral issues). Discussion included better coordination among service providers (e.g., a universal release-of-information form), hiring Spanish-speaking staff, coupling housing with wraparound services, and increased visibility of existing services. Specific recommendations for the council included holding grant recipients accountable, reviewing outcome data, following up on the mayor's homeless coordinator position, and avoiding stigmatizing language.
  • Group C – Public Safety Response, Prevention, and Accountability: Key themes were the need for careful crisis communication on social media, balancing enforcement with compassion, and addressing the trauma inherent in public-safety encounters for all involved. Participants emphasized asset mapping of existing resources, expanding public education (e.g., a residents academy model), and marketing alternative numbers like 211 and 988. They called for integrated services involving IU, Monroe County, and the city.
  • Group D – Communication, Transparency, and Community Trust: Two separate reports were given - one from the in-person group and one from a virtual group. The in-person group focused on improving information access for both council members and the public. Suggestions included better council awareness of community organizations and public-safety resources, expanding partnerships, and council members meeting regularly with district leaders. Gun safety education was also raised. The virtual group discussed budgetary concerns (PSAP funds commingled, tax increases for dispatch), cybersecurity vulnerabilities, inadequate public comment time (proposal for an ombudsman), and the need for comprehensive collaboration on substance-use treatment, including jail programs and peer support.

Key Outcomes

  • No formal votes or decisions were taken; the session was designed for idea generation and community input.
  • The council plans to consider legislative proposals related to public safety within the next six months, informed by the discussions and exit survey results.
  • Participants completed an exit survey to provide additional feedback on both the topics and the process.
  • CGM will compile a report of the evening's findings for the city council.

Meeting Transcript

Everybody and welcome to session two of the city council's um uh um uh public safety deliberation sessions. Thank you so much for being here. It's going to be a wonderful time. So I'll just call this meeting to order. Um I I think we have to do the thing where the clerk says that we're all here. So um I'll pass to the clerk to call us all in. Okay, councilmember Stasberg. Here. Piedmont Smith. Here. Zule? Here. Sorry. I'm also here. Daily? Here. Rallo. Here. All right. Well, thank you so much for those joining online. Um, and we're gonna have lots of breakout things, and and Councilmember Rallo is gonna be leading that, but for now I'm gonna hand over to our okay. I'm passing over to Councilmember Stasberg. Take it away, ma'am. Thank you so much. Welcome everybody. I'm so happy to have you guys here tonight for our second uh community conversation and deliberation session on public safety. Um if staff could uh maybe get that slideshow up on the screen, that would be great. I'm just gonna do a little introduction and then I'm gonna pass it over to a colleague, and then we're gonna there we go. Wonderful. Um sure. Thank you. I think that this was the welcome, so I already did that. Um so this is our little agenda overview for this evening. Um we're starting with this opening presentation uh with myself, and then I'll pass it over to Councilmember Piedmont Smith. Uh, we're gonna do some community agreements and a process overview with uh Wyatt Lawson, who's in the back from CGM. And then most of our time is gonna be spent having small group deliberative sessions. Um each group is gonna be on a different topic. Then we'll get reports out from each group at the end, do an exit survey, and talk about next steps for this. So, in terms of what we've already done, how many of you came or like watched the video or did the survey or anything like that from the first session? Can I just have like a little show of hands? Okay, so about half of you. So at the first session, we had um uh just kind of general conversation with folks about and and every group talked about the same thing, and it was what makes you feel safe and unsafe in in Bloomington. And there was an exit survey, and then in early October there was some follow-up survey kind of recognizing who we connected with in that session and who we did not connect with in that session and trying to reach out with some deliberation to different folks. And CJAM uh wrote up a report for us on session one. And so, as part of that report, there were some very specific focus points identified that were kind of commonalities between those things. And so tonight there's we're highlighting four of those commonalities, and so you can see there's four tables set up. So each group is going to be a different one of those topics. Don't feel like you have to stay in the topic that you happened to sit down at this evening before we go into the sessions.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com