OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Bloomington, Indiana/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Bloomington City Council Special Session - October 27, 2026

City Council — Tuesday, October 27, 2026
BodyBloomington, Indiana
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, October 27, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:14:04

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

So I

Speaker 2

0:01

will call to order the special session of the Bloomington City Council.

0:09

Today is a day.

0:10

What is the day?

0:12

26th of October.

0:14

Will the clerk please call the roll?

Speaker 3

0:16

Council Member Stasford?

Speaker 2

0:18

Here.

Speaker 3

0:20

Zulik here.

0:21

Sorry.

Speaker 2

0:21

Here.

Speaker 3

0:22

Daily.

0:23

Here.

0:23

Rough.

Unassigned speaker

0:24

Okay.

Speaker 2

0:25

All right.

0:26

Fantastic.

0:27

Well, this is just a special meeting for some matters concerning the PS lit that we didn't address during the budget season, or during our normal sort of budget window.

0:42

And so this is what we are here for.

0:45

Can I can you just go up so I can say what's on the table?

0:47

So we just have one matter on the agenda today, which is resolution 2026 23.

0:53

So is there any amendments to the agenda?

0:57

Thank you very much.

0:58

Are there any motions?

Speaker 4

1:01

I move that the clerk read um resolution 2026 23 by title and synopsis only.

1:09

Second.

Speaker 2

1:10

Okay.

1:11

Motion and the second, doesn't need discussion.

1:15

All those in favor say I.

1:18

It has uh so been moved.

1:19

So clerk, will you kindly read this by title and synopsis?

Speaker 3

1:24

Yes.

1:25

Resolution 2026-23 resolution proposing an ordinance modifying local income tax rate and allocations in Monroe County and casting votes in favor of the ordinance regarding increasing the public safety answering point rate and the total public safety local income tax rate and total expenditure tax rate without changing other allocations.

1:45

The synopsis is as follows.

1:49

Resolution 2026-23 increases the public safety answering point rate and subsequently the overall public safety income tax and total expenditure tax rate in order to fully fund dispatch operations as recommended by the PS Lit Committee of the Monroe County Local Income Tax Council.

Speaker 2

2:08

Okay, thank you very much.

2:09

Um is there another motion?

Speaker 4

2:11

I move to discuss resolution 256.

2:14

We can adopt this resolution.

2:16

Right.

2:17

And if you want to, what is the discussion?

2:19

I move to adopt I'm all messed up.

2:22

I move to adopt resolution 2026-23.

2:27

Second.

Speaker 2

2:28

Motion and the second.

2:29

Any discussion?

2:31

All right.

2:32

Um, all those in favor say

Speaker 5

2:34

what?

Speaker 2

2:34

There's an amendment.

2:35

Oh, there's no amendment.

2:37

Don't we

Speaker 6

2:37

need to

Speaker 5

2:38

end up citation to understand what we're voting on.

Speaker 2

2:40

Oh, sorry, sorry, sorry.

2:41

I I also am confused because we're sitting on this table.

2:44

So let's let's let's get to this.

2:47

I think Jeff is going to talk.

2:49

You want to talk about it a little bit?

2:50

Do you want to do an introduction?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Safety█████████████████████████████████████████████48%
Fiscal Sustainability█████████████████████████████████████39%
Procedural██████████11%
Technology and Innovation█1%
Interlocal Agreements█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Bloomington City Council Special Session - October 27, 2026

This special session was convened to consider Resolution 2026-23, which would increase the Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) rate and the overall Public Safety Local Income Tax rate to fully fund dispatch operations, as recommended by the Monroe County Local Income Tax Council's PS Lit Committee. The resolution failed after extensive discussion and public testimony.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Kevin Keel opposed the resolution, arguing that the projected funding gap does not by itself justify a tax increase without a formal plan for reserves, equipment, and staffing. He noted that actual spending has differed from budget due to recruitment challenges and that the county holds significant dispatch reserves. He urged the council to take more time to develop a combined financial forecast and reserve targets.
  • Eric Oz raised multiple material questions about the lack of required annual meetings, the late creation of a dedicated PSAP fund (April 2025), gaps in revenue tracking, and compliance of the interlocal agreement. He recommended not increasing the PSAP rate until these issues are transparently addressed, and called for an immediate meeting of the PS Lit committee.

Discussion Items

  • Financial Presentation: Controller Jeff McKim presented updated financials for the city's PSAP fund, showing a projected year-end balance of about $1 million for 2026, and a deficit budget of $4.8 million against $4 million in projected revenue (from the county) for 2027, leaving reserves nearly exhausted. He noted that the county's PSAP reserves ($3.26 million) and 911 reserves ($2.7 million) could be used, but that major technology replacements (e.g., $2.3 million for radios) are imminent.
  • Interlocal Agreement Concerns: Council members discovered that the 2018 interlocal agreement requires an annual joint work session between city and county councils before September 1, which apparently has not been held in recent years. The agreement also requires the city and county to cover budget shortfalls equally after reserves are exhausted.
  • Rate Impact: An increase would cost approximately $37 per year for a household with $100,000 adjusted gross income (71 cents per week).
  • Alternative Funding: Some council members suggested using General Fund dollars or a General Obligation bond for capital equipment, rather than a tax increase.
  • Timing: The county must also adopt the increase by November 1 for collection to start January 1, 2027; a later adoption would delay collection.

Amendment

  • Councilmember Stasberg introduced an amendment to correct a rounding error (changing 0.287 to 0.2869) and fix a formatting issue in Section 1, Item 5. The amendment passed unanimously on a voice vote (no roll call recorded).

Key Outcomes

  • Resolution 2026-23 Failed: After discussion and public comment, the resolution was put to a roll call vote. Councilmembers Piedmont Smith, Daily, and Stasberg voted no; no yes votes were recorded. The motion did not pass.
  • Next Steps: Council acknowledged the need to revise the interlocal agreement, schedule a joint meeting with the county, and develop a comprehensive funding plan for dispatch operations. A special Plan Commission session was announced for Wednesday, and a Fiscal Committee meeting for Friday.

Meeting Transcript

So I will call to order the special session of the Bloomington City Council. Today is a day. What is the day? 26th of October. Will the clerk please call the roll? Council Member Stasford? Here. Zulik here. Sorry. Here. Daily. Here. Rough. Okay. All right. Fantastic. Well, this is just a special meeting for some matters concerning the PS lit that we didn't address during the budget season, or during our normal sort of budget window. And so this is what we are here for. Can I can you just go up so I can say what's on the table? So we just have one matter on the agenda today, which is resolution 2026 23. So is there any amendments to the agenda? Thank you very much. Are there any motions? I move that the clerk read um resolution 2026 23 by title and synopsis only. Second. Okay. Motion and the second, doesn't need discussion. All those in favor say I. It has uh so been moved. So clerk, will you kindly read this by title and synopsis? Yes. Resolution 2026-23 resolution proposing an ordinance modifying local income tax rate and allocations in Monroe County and casting votes in favor of the ordinance regarding increasing the public safety answering point rate and the total public safety local income tax rate and total expenditure tax rate without changing other allocations. The synopsis is as follows. Resolution 2026-23 increases the public safety answering point rate and subsequently the overall public safety income tax and total expenditure tax rate in order to fully fund dispatch operations as recommended by the PS Lit Committee of the Monroe County Local Income Tax Council. Okay, thank you very much. Um is there another motion? I move to discuss resolution 256. We can adopt this resolution. Right. And if you want to, what is the discussion? I move to adopt I'm all messed up. I move to adopt resolution 2026-23. Second. Motion and the second. Any discussion? All right. Um, all those in favor say what? There's an amendment.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com