OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Boston City Council Hearing on Housing Voucher Discrimination and Fair Housing Enforcement – July 24, 2026

City CouncilFriday, July 24, 2026
BodyBoston, Massachusetts
SessionCity Council
DateFriday, July 24, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:31:12

Transcript — Verbatim
2:10

Good morning.

2:12

My name is Minyard Culpeper.

2:16

City Council District Seven and the Chair of the Boston City Council Committee on Civil Rights, Racial Equity, and Immigrant Advancement.

2:27

Today is July twenty-fourth.

2:30

The exact time is ten oh two.

2:33

This hearing is being recorded and it is also being live streamed by Boston.gov backslash city council TV and broadcast on Xfinity Channel Eight.

2:46

RCN Channel 82, files, channel nine six four.

2:51

Written comments may be sent to the committee.

2:54

Email at CCC dot civil rights at Boston.gov and will be made part of the record and available to all counselors.

3:04

Public testimony will be taken at the end of this hearing.

3:14

If you're interested in testifying in person, please add your name to the sign-up sheet near the entrance of the chamber.

3:22

If you are looking to testify virtually, please email our central staff liaison Megan Kavanaugh at Megan dot Kavanaugh at Boston.gov.

3:34

Let me just repeat that.

3:35

If you're looking to testify virtually, please email our Central Staff Liaison, Megan Cavanaugh at Megan dot Cavanaugh at Boston.gov for the link and your name will be added to the list.

3:50

Today's hearing is on Docket O three nine.

3:54

Order for a hearing regarding housing voucher discrimination and fair housing civil rights enforcement in Boston.

4:02

This matter was sponsored by myself, Councilman Culpepper, and Brian Will, Council World, and we'll be referred to the committee was referred to the committee on July eighth, twenty twenty-six.

5:00

339, order for a hearing regarding housing voucher discrimination and fair housing civil rights enforcement in Boston.

5:05

I will follow up with any additional questions upon reviewing my staff's notes and watching the record.

5:12

Please do not hesitate to contact my staff with any questions.

5:16

Sincerely, Boston City Council, District 5, Enrique Pepin.

5:25

Good morning, everyone.

5:27

I want to thank my colleague for that letter of absence.

5:33

And I want to thank the administration, our panelists, members of the public for joining us for this important discussion on housing voucher discrimination and fair housing civil rights enforcement in Boston.

5:47

I filed this hearing order because fair and equal access to housing is fundamentally a civil rights issue, and I have become increasingly concerned by reports of housing discrimination in Boston, particularly against residents who rely on housing vouchers.

6:08

In a city where finding an affordable apartment is already extraordinarily difficult, no qualified renters should face an additional barrier simply because of their race, source of income, or the lawful rental assistant they use to pay their rent.

6:27

Another one of the primary reasons I filed this hearing was the findings from the Fair Housing Report produced by Suffolk University Law Schools Housing Discrimination Testing Program, the Boston Foundation, an analysis group titled Qualified Renters Need Not Apply.

6:45

The findings were deeply concerning.

6:48

Through match pair testing and Greater Boston rental market, researchers found evidence of voucher discrimination in 80% of the tests and race-based discrimination in 71%.

7:02

White market rate renters were able to view apartments 80% of the time, compared with 48% for similarly situated black market rate renters.

7:14

For renters using vouchers, those rates fell to just 12% for white voucher holders and 18% for black voucher holders.

7:25

The city also recognized the importance of continuing this work during the fiscal year 27 budget process.

7:33

Through a budget amendment, we successfully secured 100,000 to continue Boston's Fair Housing Testing Program.

7:41

Testing is one of the most important tools we have for identifying discrimination that may otherwise go undetected.

7:50

And today I want to better understand how we can build upon that investment.

7:55

What is especially troubling is how early in the housing search this discrimination can occur.

8:02

The report documented voucher holders being ghosted after disclosing that they intended to use a voucher, being told about fewer available apartments, being shown fewer units, and being less likely to receive an application or follow-up communication.

8:20

In other words, a qualified renter may be denied a meaningful opportunity to even compete for an apartment before they ever submit an application.

8:34

That report was published six years ago.

8:36

Today I want us to understand what has changed since then, and more importantly, what has not.

10:06

My final reason for this hearing today is when I was the regional counsel at HUD, and this report came out.

10:13

We were looking at ways to file a suit based on some of the information that was gathered in the report.

10:21

One of the challenges we had as regional council, I was looking for a larger apartment complex to file suit against We didn't find that larger housing complex.

10:34

And before I could put the suit together, I had resigned or retired and was running for the Senate.

10:43

Didn't win that race, but I came back to run for city council, and lo and behold, I end up sitting here this morning.

10:52

And my interest in this Section 8 discrimination has not waned at all.

10:58

One of the things I hope we can talk about that I did see in the report was where it listed that a team wanted to come together to file lawsuits against some of the owners.

11:10

So with that, uh I would like to introduce panel two.

11:17

We have two of the panelists who will be on Zoom, and then we'll move to panel one to the city's uh.

11:30

They here?

11:31

Great.

11:32

So let's start with the two panelists on Zoom.

11:36

Uh Girlwyn Linson, Esquire, Senior Attorney, with the lawyer of civil rights and Brooke Simone Esquire.

11:44

Brooke.

11:45

Are you there, Brooke?

11:48

Uh, Councilmember Culpepper, can you hear me?

11:51

Great.

11:51

I can hear you, and I can see you.

11:54

Great.

11:55

It's actually just gonna be me, Jillian Lenson, who's gonna testify.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Fair Housing█████████████████████████████████████████████75%
Civil Rights██████10%
Public Housing████6%
Pending Litigation███5%
Procedural██4%
Summary of Proceedings

Boston City Council Hearing on Housing Voucher Discrimination and Fair Housing Enforcement – July 24, 2026

On July 24, 2026, the Boston City Council Committee on Civil Rights, Racial Equity, and Immigrant Advancement, chaired by Councilmember Minyard Culpeper (District 7), held a hearing on Docket O39 – an order regarding housing voucher discrimination and fair housing civil rights enforcement in Boston. The hearing examined persistent discrimination against renters using housing vouchers, six years after the landmark Suffolk University Law School/Boston Foundation report "Qualified Renters Need Not Apply" documented widespread bias. Panelists from Lawyers for Civil Rights, Suffolk University Law School's Center for Housing Justice and Policy, the Boston Foundation, the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD), and city officials discussed testing results, enforcement gaps, and recommendations.

Consent Calendar

  • None noted. The agenda and minutes were not available.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • T. Lawrence Ware (public testimony via Zoom) described a pattern where landlords receive disparaging verbal references from previous landlords, leaving voucher holders with no written record and risking voucher expiration within 120 days. He requested that the city implement a program requiring references to be submitted in writing or via email so they can be tracked, and that landlords be required to attend discrimination training. He also noted that it is difficult for voucher holders to reach the right person at the Boston Housing Authority when reporting discrimination.

Discussion Items

  • Councilmember Culpeper opened by stating that fair housing is a civil rights issue and that qualified renters should not face barriers due to race, source of income, or lawful rental assistance. He referenced the 2020 Suffolk University/Boston Foundation report finding voucher discrimination in 80% of paired tests and race-based discrimination in 71%. White market-rate renters could view apartments 80% of the time, versus 48% for Black market-rate renters; for voucher holders, rates fell to 12% for white voucher holders and 18% for Black voucher holders. He noted that the city secured $100,000 in the FY27 budget for a Fair Housing Testing Program. As former HUD regional counsel, he had sought to file suit based on the report but could not find a large apartment complex as a target.
  • Jillian Lenson (Lawyers for Civil Rights) reported that her organization filed a lawsuit in 2024 against 20 Boston-area landlords and brokers for voucher discrimination, but the case was dismissed on a procedural motion. She recommended the city prioritize training and public education for housing providers and tenants, increase penalties for real estate providers who discriminate, ensure fast-acting enforcement given the time-limited nature of vouchers, commit resources for testing and impact litigation, and support families at risk of losing subsidies due to discrimination (e.g., by maximizing program flexibilities and staff resources). She also noted that HUD's investigation into Boston's fair housing efforts is baseless.
  • Chief Severa (Chief of Equity and Inclusion) reported that the Office of Fair Housing and Equity (OFHE) has received 412 complaints since July 1, 2020, with the largest category (33%) marked as "unknown or not categorized" – attributed by an investigator to data entry errors rather than a lack of investigation. She stated that a new executive director for OFHE will be announced within several weeks, and a director of investigations will start soon. She acknowledged delays due to turnover, grief over the loss of former director Bob Torrell, and a six-month hiring freeze. OFHE is a Fair Housing Assistance Program (FAP) agency contracted with HUD; its goal is to investigate and issue a finding within 100 days.
  • Virginia Albert (Assistant Director of Civil Rights, Boston Housing Authority – BHA) explained that BHA's Office of Civil Rights (OCR) investigates discrimination complaints from BHA public housing residents, applicants, and employees but does not have authority to investigate complaints against private landlords involving voucher holders. Since 2020, BHA has referred such complaints to OFHE. She noted that BHA helped introduce the Housing Rights Initiative to Boston, leading to the 2024 lawsuit. BHA has created a voucher discrimination guide, and its ECHO program conducts landlord engagement and training. BHA has an internal policy to extend voucher expiration for those experiencing discrimination; the exact time limit is unclear.
  • Kelly Vieira (Suffolk University Law School, former Director of Investigations and Outreach) described a city-funded testing project conducted from 2020–2022 that found voucher holders were ignored or ghosted, told units were unavailable, subjected to higher income requirements, or asked for additional documentation. In one example, a white tester named "Anne" was offered savings worth $4,440 (free first month's rent, free parking) while a Black tester named "LaToya" touring the same unit was not offered any incentives. Black testers were also told about background and sex offender checks that white testers were not. She emphasized that federal funding cannot be used for voucher discrimination enforcement, making city funding essential.
  • Ashley Grant (Director of Fair Housing Enforcement, Suffolk University Law School Center for Housing Justice and Policy – CHJP) gave examples of clients helped through testing and enforcement: a disabled veteran with a HUD-VASH voucher who was denied based on rent-to-income ratio (resolved with policy change), and a family with a six-month-old baby who was denied housing because the landlord refused to provide a lead certificate (resolved after CHJP intervention, allowing the family to move in after six weeks in a shelter). She reported that CHJP receives nearly 300 calls per year to its intake line but can only help a fraction. She noted that state funding for the Fair Housing Alliance of Massachusetts will end January 1, 2027, and a lawsuit was filed yesterday (July 23, 2026) by the Massachusetts Fair Housing Center against HUD over potential restrictions on federal funding for fair housing organizations.
  • Sonia Gupta (Boston Foundation) stated that the Foundation remains open to supporting future testing. She noted that state legislation (Senate Bill S2947), passed by the Senate on February 12, 2026, would mandate fair housing training for real estate professionals, increase license suspensions for repeat offenses, and expand public reporting of complaints – including authorizing the Boston Fair Housing Commission to refer cases to the licensing board. She also emphasized that there are not enough vouchers; only one in four eligible families receives one.
  • Andrew Espinosa (Deputy Chief of Investigations, MCAD) reported that MCAD received 655 fair housing claims in FY26, with public assistance (voucher) discrimination being the fourth most common claim type (70 claims). Of those, 30% (21 claims) involved properties in Boston. He noted that MCAD’s new online filing portal will soon allow non-attorneys to file complaints directly. He highlighted challenges: MCAD has a small staff, federal funding is uncertain (HUD is rolling back protections and grants may be subject to executive orders on DEI), and the state has provided level funding for the first time, not an increase. He stated that very few cases (two housing-related public hearings last year) reach a hearing; most settle or are dismissed for lack of probable cause.

Key Outcomes

  • Councilmember Culpeper announced he will work with panelists to organize community education events to inform residents about voucher discrimination and their rights, independent of funding.
  • The OFHE will soon have a new executive director and director of investigations; the city expects to announce these hires within several weeks.
  • The $100,000 budgeted for the Fair Housing Testing Program will be allocated; panelists urged the city to commit additional funding for testing, enforcement, and education, noting that state and federal funding for voucher discrimination work is being cut or is uncertain.
  • Councilmember Culpeper indicated he will follow up to obtain copies of the dismissed LCR lawsuit and the multi-state enforcement action against Graystar LLC, and will review data on the 655 MCAD claims and outcomes.
  • The hearing was adjourned with a commitment to continue working on fair housing enforcement and to hold the city accountable for implementing recommendations from the 2020 report and today’s testimony.

Meeting Transcript

Good morning. My name is Minyard Culpeper. City Council District Seven and the Chair of the Boston City Council Committee on Civil Rights, Racial Equity, and Immigrant Advancement. Today is July twenty-fourth. The exact time is ten oh two. This hearing is being recorded and it is also being live streamed by Boston.gov backslash city council TV and broadcast on Xfinity Channel Eight. RCN Channel 82, files, channel nine six four. Written comments may be sent to the committee. Email at CCC dot civil rights at Boston.gov and will be made part of the record and available to all counselors. Public testimony will be taken at the end of this hearing. If you're interested in testifying in person, please add your name to the sign-up sheet near the entrance of the chamber. If you are looking to testify virtually, please email our central staff liaison Megan Kavanaugh at Megan dot Kavanaugh at Boston.gov. Let me just repeat that. If you're looking to testify virtually, please email our Central Staff Liaison, Megan Cavanaugh at Megan dot Cavanaugh at Boston.gov for the link and your name will be added to the list. Today's hearing is on Docket O three nine. Order for a hearing regarding housing voucher discrimination and fair housing civil rights enforcement in Boston. This matter was sponsored by myself, Councilman Culpepper, and Brian Will, Council World, and we'll be referred to the committee was referred to the committee on July eighth, twenty twenty-six. 339, order for a hearing regarding housing voucher discrimination and fair housing civil rights enforcement in Boston. I will follow up with any additional questions upon reviewing my staff's notes and watching the record. Please do not hesitate to contact my staff with any questions. Sincerely, Boston City Council, District 5, Enrique Pepin. Good morning, everyone. I want to thank my colleague for that letter of absence. And I want to thank the administration, our panelists, members of the public for joining us for this important discussion on housing voucher discrimination and fair housing civil rights enforcement in Boston. I filed this hearing order because fair and equal access to housing is fundamentally a civil rights issue, and I have become increasingly concerned by reports of housing discrimination in Boston, particularly against residents who rely on housing vouchers. In a city where finding an affordable apartment is already extraordinarily difficult, no qualified renters should face an additional barrier simply because of their race, source of income, or the lawful rental assistant they use to pay their rent. Another one of the primary reasons I filed this hearing was the findings from the Fair Housing Report produced by Suffolk University Law Schools Housing Discrimination Testing Program, the Boston Foundation, an analysis group titled Qualified Renters Need Not Apply. The findings were deeply concerning. Through match pair testing and Greater Boston rental market, researchers found evidence of voucher discrimination in 80% of the tests and race-based discrimination in 71%. White market rate renters were able to view apartments 80% of the time, compared with 48% for similarly situated black market rate renters. For renters using vouchers, those rates fell to just 12% for white voucher holders and 18% for black voucher holders. The city also recognized the importance of continuing this work during the fiscal year 27 budget process. Through a budget amendment, we successfully secured 100,000 to continue Boston's Fair Housing Testing Program. Testing is one of the most important tools we have for identifying discrimination that may otherwise go undetected. And today I want to better understand how we can build upon that investment. What is especially troubling is how early in the housing search this discrimination can occur. The report documented voucher holders being ghosted after disclosing that they intended to use a voucher, being told about fewer available apartments, being shown fewer units, and being less likely to receive an application or follow-up communication. In other words, a qualified renter may be denied a meaningful opportunity to even compete for an apartment before they ever submit an application. That report was published six years ago. Today I want us to understand what has changed since then, and more importantly, what has not. My final reason for this hearing today is when I was the regional counsel at HUD, and this report came out. We were looking at ways to file a suit based on some of the information that was gathered in the report. One of the challenges we had as regional council, I was looking for a larger apartment complex to file suit against We didn't find that larger housing complex. And before I could put the suit together, I had resigned or retired and was running for the Senate. Didn't win that race, but I came back to run for city council, and lo and behold, I end up sitting here this morning. And my interest in this Section 8 discrimination has not waned at all. One of the things I hope we can talk about that I did see in the report was where it listed that a team wanted to come together to file lawsuits against some of the owners. So with that, uh I would like to introduce panel two. We have two of the panelists who will be on Zoom, and then we'll move to panel one to the city's uh. They here?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com