On July 24, 2026, the Boston City Council Committee on Civil Rights, Racial Equity, and Immigrant Advancement, chaired by Councilmember Minyard Culpeper (District 7), held a hearing on Docket O39 – an order regarding housing voucher discrimination and fair housing civil rights enforcement in Boston. The hearing examined persistent discrimination against renters using housing vouchers, six years after the landmark Suffolk University Law School/Boston Foundation report "Qualified Renters Need Not Apply" documented widespread bias. Panelists from Lawyers for Civil Rights, Suffolk University Law School's Center for Housing Justice and Policy, the Boston Foundation, the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD), and city officials discussed testing results, enforcement gaps, and recommendations.
Good morning. My name is Minyard Culpeper. City Council District Seven and the Chair of the Boston City Council Committee on Civil Rights, Racial Equity, and Immigrant Advancement. Today is July twenty-fourth. The exact time is ten oh two. This hearing is being recorded and it is also being live streamed by Boston.gov backslash city council TV and broadcast on Xfinity Channel Eight. RCN Channel 82, files, channel nine six four. Written comments may be sent to the committee. Email at CCC dot civil rights at Boston.gov and will be made part of the record and available to all counselors. Public testimony will be taken at the end of this hearing. If you're interested in testifying in person, please add your name to the sign-up sheet near the entrance of the chamber. If you are looking to testify virtually, please email our central staff liaison Megan Kavanaugh at Megan dot Kavanaugh at Boston.gov. Let me just repeat that. If you're looking to testify virtually, please email our Central Staff Liaison, Megan Cavanaugh at Megan dot Cavanaugh at Boston.gov for the link and your name will be added to the list. Today's hearing is on Docket O three nine. Order for a hearing regarding housing voucher discrimination and fair housing civil rights enforcement in Boston. This matter was sponsored by myself, Councilman Culpepper, and Brian Will, Council World, and we'll be referred to the committee was referred to the committee on July eighth, twenty twenty-six. 339, order for a hearing regarding housing voucher discrimination and fair housing civil rights enforcement in Boston. I will follow up with any additional questions upon reviewing my staff's notes and watching the record. Please do not hesitate to contact my staff with any questions. Sincerely, Boston City Council, District 5, Enrique Pepin. Good morning, everyone. I want to thank my colleague for that letter of absence. And I want to thank the administration, our panelists, members of the public for joining us for this important discussion on housing voucher discrimination and fair housing civil rights enforcement in Boston. I filed this hearing order because fair and equal access to housing is fundamentally a civil rights issue, and I have become increasingly concerned by reports of housing discrimination in Boston, particularly against residents who rely on housing vouchers. In a city where finding an affordable apartment is already extraordinarily difficult, no qualified renters should face an additional barrier simply because of their race, source of income, or the lawful rental assistant they use to pay their rent. Another one of the primary reasons I filed this hearing was the findings from the Fair Housing Report produced by Suffolk University Law Schools Housing Discrimination Testing Program, the Boston Foundation, an analysis group titled Qualified Renters Need Not Apply. The findings were deeply concerning. Through match pair testing and Greater Boston rental market, researchers found evidence of voucher discrimination in 80% of the tests and race-based discrimination in 71%. White market rate renters were able to view apartments 80% of the time, compared with 48% for similarly situated black market rate renters. For renters using vouchers, those rates fell to just 12% for white voucher holders and 18% for black voucher holders. The city also recognized the importance of continuing this work during the fiscal year 27 budget process. Through a budget amendment, we successfully secured 100,000 to continue Boston's Fair Housing Testing Program. Testing is one of the most important tools we have for identifying discrimination that may otherwise go undetected. And today I want to better understand how we can build upon that investment. What is especially troubling is how early in the housing search this discrimination can occur. The report documented voucher holders being ghosted after disclosing that they intended to use a voucher, being told about fewer available apartments, being shown fewer units, and being less likely to receive an application or follow-up communication. In other words, a qualified renter may be denied a meaningful opportunity to even compete for an apartment before they ever submit an application. That report was published six years ago. Today I want us to understand what has changed since then, and more importantly, what has not. My final reason for this hearing today is when I was the regional counsel at HUD, and this report came out. We were looking at ways to file a suit based on some of the information that was gathered in the report. One of the challenges we had as regional council, I was looking for a larger apartment complex to file suit against We didn't find that larger housing complex. And before I could put the suit together, I had resigned or retired and was running for the Senate. Didn't win that race, but I came back to run for city council, and lo and behold, I end up sitting here this morning. And my interest in this Section 8 discrimination has not waned at all. One of the things I hope we can talk about that I did see in the report was where it listed that a team wanted to come together to file lawsuits against some of the owners. So with that, uh I would like to introduce panel two. We have two of the panelists who will be on Zoom, and then we'll move to panel one to the city's uh. They here?