Boston Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing – August 11, 2026
Boston Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing – August 11, 2026
The Boston Zoning Board of Appeal held a virtual hearing on August 11, 2026, starting at 9:30 AM with a six-member board. The hearing covered 20+ cases, including approvals of consent calendar items, administrative deferrals, and substantive decisions on conditional use permits, variances, and proviso removals. Key votes included denials of a proviso removal (later reversed) and a three-unit townhouse proposal, along with approvals of several residential additions, subdivisions, and a rental car agency.
Consent Calendar
- Approval of Hearing Minutes (July 28, 2026): Approved 6-0.
- Extensions (6 cases): Approved 6-0.
Public Comments & Testimony
- 415–415A Hanover Street (outdoor seating): The Mayor’s Office of Neighborhood Services deferred; Councilor Coletta’s office supported. No public opposition.
- 35 Braddock Park (renovation): Community meeting supportive; a 59-year resident spoke in favor, noting existing similar structures. Councillor Flynn’s office supported.
- 10 Northampton Street (rental car agency): Planning Department recommended approval; community process found no feedback. No public testimony.
- 1013 Harrison Avenue (FC Tech educational use): Community meeting without opposition; Planning Department supported. No public testimony.
- 37 & 39 Kimball Street (curb cut/parking): Mayor’s Office reported community support for removing cars from streets; Planning Department recommended denial citing excessive paving. Applicant argued historical context.
- 472 Ashmont Street (garage/third unit): Lightly attended community meeting; no opposition. Councillor Fitzgerald’s office supported.
- 86 Brown Avenue (four units): Community meeting reflected both support and opposition; letters received with concerns about density, parking, and precedent. Abutters spoke against the project’s size.
- 118 Lexington Street (dormer/renovation): Eagle Hill Civic Association voted 10–3 in favor; no public testimony.
- 27–29 Ballard Street (attic/basement conversion): Jamaica Plain Neighborhood Council approved; one letter of opposition (sunlight loss) and one in support.
- 360 Princeton Street (rear deck): Eagle Hill Civic Association voted 8–0 in support; no public testimony.
- 7–9 Marine Court (fourth unit): Jeffries Point Neighborhood Association voted 8–1 in favor; Planning Department had concerns but applicant noted neighborhood context. No public testimony.
- 1 Washington Place (three townhouses): Community meeting mixed; abutters’ attorney opposed citing demolition, density, privacy, and access issues; applicant’s attorney rebutted Article 85 concerns. Seven support letters filed.
- 176 L Street (fourth story): City Point Neighborhood Association opposed; abutters raised precedent and architectural character concerns. Public testimony opposed. Councillor Flynn’s office supported.
- 43–45 Westwood Circuit (subdivision/new homes): West Roxbury Neighborhood Council supported; no public testimony.
- 178–180 Weld Street (garage replacement): Community meeting had concerns resolved; West Roxbury Neighborhood Council supported. No public testimony.
Discussion Items
- 18 Dell Avenue (proviso removal for permeable pavers): Applicant argued stormwater system already approved by BWSC. Board debated timing and whether full picture was presented. Vote on approval failed 4–2; a subsequent motion to deny passed 6–0.
- 37 & 39 Kimball Street (curb cut widening): Planning Department recommended straight denial. Applicant cited existing cramped conditions and safety. Board agreed with Planning; motion to deny passed 5–1 (Stembridge voted no).
- 86 Brown Avenue (two-to-four-unit conversion): Board discussed lot size, density, and precedent. Motion to approve passed 5–1 (Langham voted no).
- 1 Washington Place (three townhouses): Board debated lot frontage, open space, and abutter opposition. Initial motion to approve (with design review proviso) failed 4–2 (Beta Barraza and Turner voted no). A subsequent motion to deny without prejudice passed 5–1 (Stembridge voted no).
- 176 L Street (fourth-story addition): Board considered height, setback, and lack of front decks. A motion to approve with provisos (no new decks, 10-ft setback, design review) passed 6–0.
Key Outcomes
- 18 Dell Avenue: Proviso removal denied (6–0) after initial approval motion failed.
- 415–415A Hanover Street: Seasonal outdoor seating approved (6–0).
- 35 Braddock Park: Renovation and carport approved (6–0).
- 10 Northampton Street: Conditional use permit for Enterprise Rent A Car approved (6–0).
- 1013 Harrison Avenue: Conditional use permit for FC Tech educational uses approved (6–0).
- 37 & 39 Kimball Street: Curb cut request denied (5–1).
- 472 Ashmont Street: Garage and conversion to three units approved (6–0).
- 86 Brown Avenue: Four-family use approved (5–1).
- 118 Lexington Street: Dormer/renovation approved (6–0).
- 34 Vincent Street: Renovation approved (6–0).
- 27–29 Ballard Street: FAR/side yard variances approved (6–0).
- 360 Princeton Street: Rear deck variance approved (6–0) with proviso for BPD design review.
- 7–9 Marine Court: Fourth unit approved (6–0) with proviso for BPD design review on roof access.
- 1 Washington Place: Three townhouses denied without prejudice (5–1) to allow revised proposal.
- 176 L Street: Fourth-story addition approved (6–0) with provisos: no new decks, front setback per BPD, design review.
- 43–45 Westwood Circuit: Subdivision and two new homes approved (6–0).
- 178–180 Weld Street: Garage reconstruction approved (6–0) with proviso for BPD design review on driveway maneuverability.
- Deferrals granted (8 cases): 86 Walworth St., 425 E 3rd St., 121 River St., 722 E 2nd St., 57 Mount St., 1 & 2 Hopkins Pl., 105 Pleasant View St. – all deferred to September 22, 2026.
- Administrative deferral (2 cases): 1 & 2 Hopkins Pl. deferred to September 22, 2026, to address Article 79 (inclusionary zoning) concerns.
Meeting Transcript
Recording in progress. Good morning. The City of Boston zoning of zoning board of appeal hearing for August 11th, 2026 is now in session. This hearing is being conducted in accordance with the applicable provisions of the open meeting law, including updated provisions enacted by the legislature this year. The new law allows the board to continue its practice of holding virtual hearings through June 2027. This hearing of the board is being held remotely via the Zoom webinar event platform and is also being live streamed. In order to ensure this hearing of the board is open to the public, members of the public may access this hearing through telephone and video conferencing. The information connecting to this hearing is listed on today's hearing agenda, which is posted on the public notices page of the city's website, Boston.gov. Members of the public will enter the virtual hearing as attendees, which means you will not see yourself on the screen and you will be muted throughout unless administratively unmuted when asked to comment. Board members, applicants, and their attorneys or representatives will participate in the hearing as panelists, and they will appear alongside the presentation materials when speaking. As with our in-person meetings, comments and support will be followed by comments in opposition. The order of comments is as follows. Elected officials, representatives of elected officials, and members of the public. The chair may limit the number of people called upon to offer a comment and the time for commenting as time constraints require. For that reason, the board the board prefers to hear from members of the public who are most impacted by a project. That is those individuals who live closest to the project. If you wish to comment on an appeal, please click the raise hand button along the bottom of your screen in the Zoom webinar platform. Click it again and your hand should go down. When the host sees your hand, you will receive a request to unmute yourself. So yes, and you should be able to talk. If you are connected to the hearing by telephone, please press star nine to raise and lower your hand. You must press star six to unmute yourself after you receive the request from the host. Those called upon to comment will be asked to state their name and address first and then can provide their comment. In the interest of the time and to ensure that you have enough time to do so, please raise your hand as soon as Mr. Stanbridge leaves the address into the record. Do not raise your hand before the relevant address is called or the meeting host will not know to call on you at the appropriate time. We ask that you keep your comments brief and all public testimony will be limited to 90 seconds for speaker. Mr. Stembridge. Good morning, Ms. Bateraza. Good morning, my chair present. Good morning, Ms. Turner. Is Ms. Turner with us? Ms. Wewell. Good morning, Madam Chair Present. Good morning. Is Ms. Turner with us? Does anyone know? Stephanie or Caroline. She should be. Okay, thank you. Because right now, right now without Ms. Turner, we are a five-member board. I think she's here. Okay, well, let's make sure we're elevating her.
openpublica.com