OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Boston, Massachusetts/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Government Operations Committee Hearing on Unarmed Security Guard Training – September 17, 2026

City Council — Thursday, September 17, 2026
BodyBoston, Massachusetts
SessionCity Council
DateThursday, September 17, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 3:13:56

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
17:55

Good morning, everybody.

17:56

Happy to be here for the record.

17:57

My name is Gabriela Coletta Zapata, District One City Councilor, and I'm the chair of the Boston City Council Committee on government operations.

18:04

Today is September 17th, 2026.

18:07

The exact time is ten eighteen AM.

18:10

This hearing is being recorded.gov forward slash city dash council dash TV and broadcast on Xfinity Channel Eight, RCN Channel 82, and Files Channel 964.

18:24

Written comments may be sent to the committee email at CCC.gov and will be made a part of the record and available to all counselors.

18:33

Public testimony will be taken at the end of this hearing.

18:42

If you are interested in testifying in person, please add your name to the sign-up sheet near the entrance of the chamber.

18:47

If you are looking to testify virtually, please email our central staff liaison Megan at M E A G A N.gov for the link, and your name will be added to the list.

19:05

Today's hearing is on Docket One Five Four One, an ordinance establishing minimum training training requirements for unarmed security guards.

20:03

They are often the first to respond when someone is experiencing a medical emergency, a mental health crisis, and other urgent situations.

20:10

They also regularly work with individuals battling homelessness and substance use disorders.

20:16

I was a security guard myself, and the only kind of training I received was on my first day when I was chaperoned by someone.

20:25

After that, I was left on my own to handle any type of situation that might come up.

20:30

Despite all the important responsibilities that came up, there are currently no training requirements for unarmed security guards in Boston at the state or local level.

20:39

These professionals are expected to make quick decisions, de-escalate conflicts, and respond to our emergencies.

20:45

Yet many have not received any training to prepare them for these situations and might have only been in the job for a few weeks.

20:54

Establishing these training standards is about investing in both worker safety and public safety.

20:59

I appreciate the concerns I have heard from many stakeholders in the community as well as from business owners regarding the current language of this ordinance.

21:07

This hearing provides an opportunity for all stakeholders to share their feedback.

21:11

We want to ensure that everyone is included in these conversations and that we are aligned as we move forward.

21:17

Our goal is to pass legislation that is appropriate for this moment and reflects the needs and concerns of our community.

21:23

I understand and appreciate the objections that I that I have heard about the timeline and roadmap towards the implementation, along with what some of you shared on how you can conduct your training from for your own security personnel.

21:38

I am looking forward to the discussion today and um try chatting a path, seeing a path forward by investing in the people who are often the first to respond.

21:48

We are investing in safer workspaces and a safer Boston for everyone.

21:52

Thank you.

21:53

Thank you, Councillor Santana.

21:54

Councilor Flynn, you now have the floor.

21:57

Thank you, madam chair, and thank you to the panel for being here for the public testimony that we're going to hear from as well.

22:07

Um before before I begin, and I'll I'll just have very brief comments.

22:12

Um I am going to be leaving this meeting in a few minutes.

22:17

Um but hopefully I'm back by 11 30.

22:20

I do have an appointment that I do have to make.

22:22

Um but it is my plan to be back by 11 30 for the remainder of the meeting.

22:28

Um but what I wanted to highlight in my opening statement is the important role security, unarmed security guards play in our city.

22:40

Yes, we need training.

22:42

We need to support support them, but we also need to support a lot of small businesses, security businesses that hire a lot of people, especially businesses owned by people of color as well.

22:57

My challenge or goal is to see how we're able to work together for language in this document that supports a compromise and ensures that we provide the necessary training uh for unarmed security guards, but also to support companies that play a critical role in our city, especially the importance of companies owned by people of color.

23:24

They have to be respected as well.

23:26

Uh Mr.

23:26

Chair Madam Chair, thank you very much.

23:29

Thank you.

23:29

We've been joined by Counselor Um Aaron Murphy.

23:32

Councilor Murphy, would you like any remarks?

23:35

Yeah, just happy to be here.

23:36

Part of the conversation, like Council Flynn was just saying, it's a balance.

23:40

We want to make sure anyone who is in these roles, important roles, have the training they need, but at the same time, we have to make sure that we're listening to those who you know employ them and train them the way, you know.

23:54

So just it's a balance, and I'm here to listen and get all the information I can to make sure the language is right.

24:00

Thank you.

24:01

Thank you.

24:01

Uh, we also have a letter of absence from Councillor Culpepper that I will read in part.

24:07

Um says, Dear Chair Coletta Zapata and members of the Committee on Government Operations, I regret to inform you.

24:12

I am unable to attend this morning's hearing.

24:15

I would like to thank uh folks for holding this hearing and panelists and members of the public for their participation.

24:21

While I support ensuring that unarmed security officers in Boston receive appropriate training, I have serious concerns about this ordinance and remain opposed to it in its current form.

24:30

My office has received numerous letters and communication and has met directly with businesses, institutions, and community stakeholders who have raised concerns about the ordinances' training requirements, restrictions on employer provided training, permitting structure, penalties, and implement implementation timeline.

24:44

I'm concerned about the potential burden on small minority-owned security businesses and employers that already provide substantial training tailored to their workplaces.

24:52

Um he from those who would be directly impacted, I cannot support uh this document in its current form.

24:57

Sincerely, Councillor Culpepper, representative of District 7.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Safety█████████████████████████████████████████████50%
Workforce Development███████████12%
Security Training██████████11%
Labor██████████11%
Public Health█████6%
Procedural███3%
Racial Equity██2%
Public Education██2%
Personnel Matters█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Government Operations Committee Hearing on Unarmed Security Guard Training – September 17, 2026

The Boston City Council Committee on Government Operations, chaired by Councilor Gabriela Coletta Zapata, held a hearing on Docket #1541, an ordinance establishing minimum training requirements for unarmed security guards in Boston. The hearing began at 10:18 AM and included two expert panels, public testimony, and extensive discussion among councilors. The ordinance would mandate 40 hours of initial training (within 90 days for new guards, 180 days for existing guards) and 8 hours annually, with training provided by city-certified nonprofit programs paid for by employers.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Several members of the public testified in support of the ordinance, including representatives from the NAACP Boston branch, MassCOSH, Amalgamated Bank, Northeastern University (student), and the Committee of Interns and Residents (CIR). They emphasized that security guards, who are predominantly Black and brown workers, frequently face dangerous situations without adequate preparation and deserve standardized training to ensure public and worker safety.
  • Robert Steadman (Securitas) spoke against the 40-hour mandate, arguing that effective training should be competency-based and site-specific, not driven by an arbitrary hour requirement. He also objected to prohibiting employers from conducting their own training.
  • Steve Amate (NASCO) opposed the ordinance, stating that the prohibition on employer-led training is flawed and that the city lacks the staff and budget to implement the program effectively. He urged the committee to restart the process.

Discussion Items

First Panel – Industry Representatives:

  • Patricia McMullen (Conference of Boston Teaching Hospitals): Supported training but opposed a one-size-fits-all approach. Proposed allowing employers with robust training programs to attest to meeting city standards, and suggested the city first impose requirements on its own employees.
  • Herbie Duvernay (Winwalker Solutions/Black Economic Council of Massachusetts): Stated that the 40-hour requirement creates barriers for small businesses and entry-level workers, especially students and immigrants. He noted his company provides ongoing, site-specific training and argued the ordinance would increase costs without improving outcomes.
  • David Console (RedCon Security): Said the 40-hour mandate, plus the ban on employer-led training, would be financially crushing for small firms like his (50 employees). He highlighted existing training tools (e.g., AI-based platform Eptiva) and expressed concern about penalties for minor paperwork errors.
  • Cameron Kilberg (Allied Universal, via video): Opposed the ordinance, citing its prohibition on employer training, the lack of a grandfather clause, the unrealistic 30-day implementation timeline, and the absence of city funding for enforcement. She noted that a similar law in Philadelphia remains unimplemented.

Second Panel – Union and Security Officers:

  • Carmen Fonseca, Rob Cook, Roberto Brown McCormick, Okel St. Louis, David Williams, and Travina Garrell (all from SEIU 32BJ and affiliated training funds) testified strongly in support of the ordinance. They shared personal stories of receiving minimal or no training despite facing medical emergencies, mental health crises, and violence. They argued that only a uniform, in-person, nonprofit-delivered standard can ensure all guards are prepared, and that currently, training varies widely by employer. Travina Garrell emphasized that in-person training (role-playing, hands-on drills) is far superior to online videos. Several officers described situations where they lacked guidance on de-escalation or emergency response, and were subsequently disciplined regardless of their actions.

Councilors’ Questions and Discussion:

  • Councilor Santana (lead sponsor) noted that security officers at prior hearings testified to receiving little training. He pressed industry panelists on how they ensure all officers are trained, and acknowledged the need to hear all stakeholders.
  • Councilor Flynn asked about wages (ranging $19–$27/hour) and the impact on small minority-owned businesses. Panelists said about 40–68% of their workforce are people of color.
  • Councilor Murphy discussed the fine line between a security guard’s role and police responsibilities, and how officers are trained to de-escalate and call for backup when needed.
  • Councilor Louis Jean emphasized that the goal is to professionalize the industry and protect workers, who are majority Black and brown. She questioned whether the ordinance could be implemented without harming small businesses.
  • Chair Coletta Zapata asked about additional costs of training (beyond wages) and use of technology. Duvernay noted that small firms cannot absorb costs across as many employees as large companies. Console suggested 12 hours as a more reasonable initial training requirement.

Key Outcomes

  • The ordinance (Docket #1541) was left in committee, with Chair Coletta Zapata stating her intention to hold working sessions with all stakeholders to refine the language.
  • No vote was taken at this hearing.
  • Numerous concerns were raised about the 40-hour requirement, the prohibition on employer-led training, the implementation timeline, and the burden on small businesses. Supporters argued that the status quo is inadequate and that standardized training is needed to protect both guards and the public.

Meeting Transcript

Good morning, everybody. Happy to be here for the record. My name is Gabriela Coletta Zapata, District One City Councilor, and I'm the chair of the Boston City Council Committee on government operations. Today is September 17th, 2026. The exact time is ten eighteen AM. This hearing is being recorded.gov forward slash city dash council dash TV and broadcast on Xfinity Channel Eight, RCN Channel 82, and Files Channel 964. Written comments may be sent to the committee email at CCC.gov and will be made a part of the record and available to all counselors. Public testimony will be taken at the end of this hearing. If you are interested in testifying in person, please add your name to the sign-up sheet near the entrance of the chamber. If you are looking to testify virtually, please email our central staff liaison Megan at M E A G A N.gov for the link, and your name will be added to the list. Today's hearing is on Docket One Five Four One, an ordinance establishing minimum training training requirements for unarmed security guards. They are often the first to respond when someone is experiencing a medical emergency, a mental health crisis, and other urgent situations. They also regularly work with individuals battling homelessness and substance use disorders. I was a security guard myself, and the only kind of training I received was on my first day when I was chaperoned by someone. After that, I was left on my own to handle any type of situation that might come up. Despite all the important responsibilities that came up, there are currently no training requirements for unarmed security guards in Boston at the state or local level. These professionals are expected to make quick decisions, de-escalate conflicts, and respond to our emergencies. Yet many have not received any training to prepare them for these situations and might have only been in the job for a few weeks. Establishing these training standards is about investing in both worker safety and public safety. I appreciate the concerns I have heard from many stakeholders in the community as well as from business owners regarding the current language of this ordinance. This hearing provides an opportunity for all stakeholders to share their feedback. We want to ensure that everyone is included in these conversations and that we are aligned as we move forward. Our goal is to pass legislation that is appropriate for this moment and reflects the needs and concerns of our community. I understand and appreciate the objections that I that I have heard about the timeline and roadmap towards the implementation, along with what some of you shared on how you can conduct your training from for your own security personnel. I am looking forward to the discussion today and um try chatting a path, seeing a path forward by investing in the people who are often the first to respond. We are investing in safer workspaces and a safer Boston for everyone. Thank you. Thank you, Councillor Santana. Councilor Flynn, you now have the floor. Thank you, madam chair, and thank you to the panel for being here for the public testimony that we're going to hear from as well. Um before before I begin, and I'll I'll just have very brief comments. Um I am going to be leaving this meeting in a few minutes. Um but hopefully I'm back by 11 30. I do have an appointment that I do have to make. Um but it is my plan to be back by 11 30 for the remainder of the meeting. Um but what I wanted to highlight in my opening statement is the important role security, unarmed security guards play in our city. Yes, we need training. We need to support support them, but we also need to support a lot of small businesses, security businesses that hire a lot of people, especially businesses owned by people of color as well. My challenge or goal is to see how we're able to work together for language in this document that supports a compromise and ensures that we provide the necessary training uh for unarmed security guards, but also to support companies that play a critical role in our city, especially the importance of companies owned by people of color. They have to be respected as well. Uh Mr. Chair Madam Chair, thank you very much. Thank you. We've been joined by Counselor Um Aaron Murphy. Councilor Murphy, would you like any remarks? Yeah, just happy to be here. Part of the conversation, like Council Flynn was just saying, it's a balance. We want to make sure anyone who is in these roles, important roles, have the training they need, but at the same time, we have to make sure that we're listening to those who you know employ them and train them the way, you know. So just it's a balance, and I'm here to listen and get all the information I can to make sure the language is right. Thank you.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com