OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Boston, Massachusetts/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Boston City Council CPA Hearing on Affordable Housing Allocation Increase (2026-10-20)

City Council — Tuesday, October 20, 2026
BodyBoston, Massachusetts
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, October 20, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 3:24:51

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

9:18

Today is October twentieth, two thousand twenty-six.

9:21

And the exact time is ten thirty nine AM.

9:25

This hearing is being recorded.

9:26

It is also being live streamed at Boston.gov.

9:32

And broadcast on Xfinity Channel eight.

9:35

RCN channel eighty-two and files channel nine six four.gov and will be made a part of the record and available to all the counselors.

9:51

Public testimony will be taken at the end of this hearing.

9:54

Individuals will be called on in the order in which they signed up, and we'll have two minutes to testify.

Unassigned speaker

10:00

If you're interested in testifying in person, please add your name to the sign up sheet near the entrance of the chamber.

Speaker 1

10:05

If you're looking to testify virtually, please email our central staff liaison, Ryan Pratt at Ryan RYAN.PRATT at Boston.gov for the link, and your name will be added to the list.

10:21

Today's hearing is on docket number 1601.

10:25

Order for a hearing to explore raising the percentage of community preservation act funds dedicated to affordable housing.

10:32

This matter was sponsored by counselors Brian Warell and Minier Cole Pepper and was referred to the committee on August 26, 2026.

10:44

Today

Unassigned speaker

10:44

I

Speaker 1

10:44

am joined by my colleagues in order of arrival, Councilor Murphy, Councillor Flynn, Councillor Durkin, and Councillor Woolrell.

10:54

Excuse any little absence?

10:56

Nope.

10:57

And today I'm also joined by the director of the community preservation treasury department, Thadine Brown.

11:06

Um, but first, before we get into the public to the panel, I want to give m the opportunity to the main sponsor for an opening statement.

Speaker 2

11:17

Uh

Unassigned speaker

11:20

thank

Speaker 2

11:20

you, Chair, and thank you, um executive director Brown for being

Unassigned speaker

11:24

here.

Speaker 2

11:25

Umso to the public and to my colleagues.

11:29

I want to acknowledge um first and foremost the work that the community preservation committee and CPA staff and the advocates who continue to put for investments in our neighborhoods.

11:39

Uh we know CPA has done a lot of good across our city.

11:44

Um, but we also know that our ARPA funding is coming to an end.

11:49

Uh we also know that there's uncertainty around state and federal housing resources.

11:55

Uh we know the construction and borrowing costs have gone up, and it's taken more public dollars to build the same amount of affordable housing.

12:04

We also have roughly 40% of our CPA supported affordable housing projects that haven't started construction.

12:12

I want to understand what's holding them up and whether additional funding can help.

12:16

Uh, Cambridge dedicates 80% of a CPA and funding to affordable housing.

12:21

Boston's goal is 50%.

Unassigned speaker

12:24

And

Speaker 2

12:24

I'm not suggesting that we move uh to 80% like Cambridge is doing, but we should be looking at possibly, and this is what this conversation is about is if we should be looking at 60 or 70 percent and what would those additional dollars mean for families trying to find an affordable home or become homeowners here in the city of Boston.

12:45

One thing that stood out to me is that the community preservation plan already allows us to revisit these allocations based on change of needs.

12:54

So, what actually causes us to use that flexibility?

12:58

If we have more parks that need major improvement, does that justify increase in funding for parks?

13:04

And if affordable housing is becoming more expensive to build, shouldn't that also be a reason to reconsider our housing allocation?

13:12

Because if the circumstances we're facing today aren't enough to revisit the formula, then what would be?

13:19

That's why I'm hoping that we can better understand that today, and I look forward to the conversation.

13:24

Thank you.

Speaker 1

13:24

Thank you, Counselor.

13:26

Okay, I am going to as a chair just wave everyone's opening room statements and just go to QA.

13:32

And I'm going to now give I

Unassigned speaker

13:34

think it's a

Speaker 1

13:35

preservation.

13:36

Presentation.

13:38

Yeah, no, I'm just waving everyone's opening statements for my colleagues.

13:41

They seem to be at QA.

13:42

No, no, no, no, no.

13:43

Um now we're gonna get a presentation from Adene Brown.

13:48

The floor is yours.

Speaker 3

13:50

Thank you.

13:52

So thank you, Chairman Pepin and members of the Boston City Council.

13:56

I have the honor of serving as the director of the community preservation office for the past eight and a half years.

Unassigned speaker

14:02

I

Speaker 3

14:02

have worked with the community preservation committee, and I've overseen all nine funding rounds.

14:07

It has been a privilege to serve the residents of Boston and help advance projects and preserve our history, expand housing opportunities, and improve community spaces across the city.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Affordable Housing█████████████████████████████████████████████56%
Community Preservation Act███████████14%
Historic Preservation██████████12%
Public Housing██████8%
Parks and Recreation██3%
Community Engagement██3%
Procedural██2%
Housing█1%
Public Education█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Boston City Council CPA Hearing on Affordable Housing Allocation Increase (2026-10-20)

The Boston City Council's Community Preservation Act (CPA) Committee held a hearing on Docket #1601 to explore raising the percentage of CPA funds dedicated to affordable housing. Councillor Worrell, the main sponsor, opened the hearing along with Chair Pepper. Director Thadine Brown presented an overview of the CPA program. Councillors engaged in extended Q&A with Director Brown, followed by public testimony and a panel of developers and policy experts.

Discussion Items

  • Councillor Worrell (Sponsor) argued that rising construction costs, the end of ARPA funding, and uncertainty in federal/state housing resources necessitate revisiting the CPA allocation formula. He noted that Cambridge dedicates 80% of its CPA funds to housing, versus Boston's 50% goal, and suggested exploring a target of 60% or 70%. He also pointed out that 40% of CPA-supported housing projects have not started construction.
  • CPA Director Thadine Brown provided a detailed overview: 438 projects totaling $259M have been funded since 2018. Current allocation is approximately 52% affordable housing, 20% historic preservation, 20% open space/recreation, and 10% flexible reserve. She highlighted the success of the One Plus Boston program (over 1,000 first-time homebuyers) and the Acquisition Opportunity Program.
  • Councillors Flynn, Durkin, Murphy, and Fitzgerald expressed caution about reducing funds for historic preservation and open space. They argued the current balanced formula has been successful and highly competitive, and that reducing one category would harm community services and green spaces. Director Brown stated the committee values a balanced approach.
  • Councillors Worrell and Louijen emphasized the severity of the housing crisis and the need for deeper affordability and homeownership opportunities. Director Brown noted the committee tries to prioritize deeper affordability (30-60% AMI) and homeownership.
  • Councillor Braden explored the discretionary 10% reserve, and Councillor Fitzgerald questioned the definition of "local resident" in project prioritization.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Open Space and Historic Preservation Advocates: Testified strongly against decreasing funding for their respective categories. Catherine Davis Wheeler (Boston Preservation Alliance) and Jeffrey Gagnon (Preservation Consultant) argued CPA funds are often the only funding source for historic preservation, unlike housing which has multiple streams. Jay Meekum (Boston Harbor Now), Mercy Robinson (Sao Boston in Action), and Liz Luke (Boston Food Forest Coalition) argued that decreasing open space funding would harm community health, resilience, and quality of life.
  • Affordable Housing Advocates and Developers: Expressly supported increasing the housing allocation. Adlar Bernadin (Norfolk Design) and Donald Alexis (Caribbean Integration) stated that construction costs have escalated 4% in the last year and subsidies are not keeping pace, making homeownership projects unsustainable. They argued strongly against moving to rental-only models without homeownership opportunities. Hilary Pizer (MAHA) detailed cuts to the One Plus Boston program and called for restoration.
  • Comprehensive Solutions: Several speakers and councillors, including Jeffrey Gagnon and Hillary Pizer, advocated for "making the pie bigger" through mechanisms like a ballot surcharge increase, a real estate transfer fee, or increasing the state CPA match, rather than shifting percentages between categories.

Key Outcomes

  • No formal vote was taken on Docket #1601.
  • The hearing served as an informational session setting the stage for future budget discussions. Councillor Worrell committed to continuing the conversation.
  • Several councillors and Director Brown noted that any change to the allocation formula would require careful evaluation of data on project queues and historical spending.
  • Councillor Worrell requested that Director Brown provide specific analysis on the FY20 spending spike, the viability of bonding against CPA funds, and the impact of the Acquisition Opportunity Program on available housing funds.

Meeting Transcript

Today is October twentieth, two thousand twenty-six. And the exact time is ten thirty nine AM. This hearing is being recorded. It is also being live streamed at Boston.gov. And broadcast on Xfinity Channel eight. RCN channel eighty-two and files channel nine six four.gov and will be made a part of the record and available to all the counselors. Public testimony will be taken at the end of this hearing. Individuals will be called on in the order in which they signed up, and we'll have two minutes to testify. If you're interested in testifying in person, please add your name to the sign up sheet near the entrance of the chamber. If you're looking to testify virtually, please email our central staff liaison, Ryan Pratt at Ryan RYAN.PRATT at Boston.gov for the link, and your name will be added to the list. Today's hearing is on docket number 1601. Order for a hearing to explore raising the percentage of community preservation act funds dedicated to affordable housing. This matter was sponsored by counselors Brian Warell and Minier Cole Pepper and was referred to the committee on August 26, 2026. Today I am joined by my colleagues in order of arrival, Councilor Murphy, Councillor Flynn, Councillor Durkin, and Councillor Woolrell. Excuse any little absence? Nope. And today I'm also joined by the director of the community preservation treasury department, Thadine Brown. Um, but first, before we get into the public to the panel, I want to give m the opportunity to the main sponsor for an opening statement. Uh thank you, Chair, and thank you, um executive director Brown for being here. Umso to the public and to my colleagues. I want to acknowledge um first and foremost the work that the community preservation committee and CPA staff and the advocates who continue to put for investments in our neighborhoods. Uh we know CPA has done a lot of good across our city. Um, but we also know that our ARPA funding is coming to an end. Uh we also know that there's uncertainty around state and federal housing resources. Uh we know the construction and borrowing costs have gone up, and it's taken more public dollars to build the same amount of affordable housing. We also have roughly 40% of our CPA supported affordable housing projects that haven't started construction. I want to understand what's holding them up and whether additional funding can help. Uh, Cambridge dedicates 80% of a CPA and funding to affordable housing. Boston's goal is 50%. And I'm not suggesting that we move uh to 80% like Cambridge is doing, but we should be looking at possibly, and this is what this conversation is about is if we should be looking at 60 or 70 percent and what would those additional dollars mean for families trying to find an affordable home or become homeowners here in the city of Boston. One thing that stood out to me is that the community preservation plan already allows us to revisit these allocations based on change of needs. So, what actually causes us to use that flexibility? If we have more parks that need major improvement, does that justify increase in funding for parks? And if affordable housing is becoming more expensive to build, shouldn't that also be a reason to reconsider our housing allocation? Because if the circumstances we're facing today aren't enough to revisit the formula, then what would be? That's why I'm hoping that we can better understand that today, and I look forward to the conversation. Thank you. Thank you, Counselor. Okay, I am going to as a chair just wave everyone's opening room statements and just go to QA. And I'm going to now give I think it's a preservation. Presentation. Yeah, no, I'm just waving everyone's opening statements for my colleagues.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com