All right, it's 5 30.

We'll go ahead and get started.

Can we get the uh roll call, please?

Mindy Payne, here.

Jonathan Townsend.

Here J.

Lee Klempa.

Here, Jason Goet.

Cohen.

Robert Gorenson.

All right.

Old business, we have none.

Moving on to uh item four, the consideration for consent agenda.

I have a note that we are polling for C for the moment.

Is there anything else that's gonna be polled?

Any comments?

No.

Any recommendations?

I make a motion to approve all items except for 4C and to please poll 4C.

All right, we have a motion and a second or roll call vote, please.

Mindy Payne, yes.

Jonathan Townsend?

Yes.

JLie Klempa?

Yes.

Jason Cohen.

Yes.

And item five, consideration uh for items removed from the consent agenda.

So going back to 4C 26-443, if staff could review that, please.

Yes.

This is approval of or sorry, approval of PT dash 002685-2026, also known as PR-00915-2026 preliminary plat for Elm Village, 21.81 acres, 89 lots, residential multifamily, and PUD 340 to RSP, single family residential preservation via BAZ-2002485 2025, located one eighth of a mile south of West Tucson Street and just west of South Elm Place.

PT das 002685-2026.

The preliminary platform Elm Village contains 89 lots on 21.81 acres.

This property is generated generally located uh one 18th mile south of West Tucson and just west of South Elm.

Um BAZ dash 002485-2025 was a request to rezone the property from residential multifamily and floodplain.

The rezoning request was heard by planning commission on November 20th, 2025, where it was recommended for approval.

BAZ-002485-2025 was approved by city council on December 2nd, 2025 2025, subject to plating.

PT-002685-2026 is the first application towards plating this property and implementing BAZ-002485 2025.

This development will have access via South Elm Place, also known as 161st East Avenue.

However, there is still need for separate emergency access or secondary street access onto Elm Place.

This will be included in the conditional final plan.

According to FEMA's national flood hazard layer, sections of the property are located within the 100-year floodplain.

These areas are planned to be dedicated as storm water drainage easements or reserve areas.

All developments were followed city, FEMA, and United States Army Corps of Engineer regulations.

Staff recommends PT-002685 2026, the preliminary plat for Elm Village be approved subject to the attached comments.

Thank you very much, sir.

In the uh um any comments from the staff or questions for the staff from the commission.

No.

Okay.

And the applicant had something to say.

Uh we'll go ahead and open that up for him.

If you could say your name, sir.

Certainly.

Good evening.

I am Eric Enyard with Tanner Consulting.

We are at 5323 South Lewis Avenue, Tulsa.

Uh thank you all for your time.

I did want to point out that we did get these review comments a little bit late.

Uh we didn't have a chance to discuss them in in the TAC meeting like we normally do.

Uh got them forwarded to us by email uh late yesterday.

So I I do need to say we are in agreement in principle.

But we do we would like to reserve the ability to work through some of the details with staff as we go through the process.

I think there was a little bit of communication loss because we didn't have that connection at the TAC meeting.

If you have any questions for me, I'll do my best to answer.

Okay.

Thank you.

How much time do you need?

Oh uh we don't need to go into details as long as staff is okay with working with us on some of those details.

Okay.

Any comments?

Um I'm just kind of curious as to what some of those details may be.

Right.

Sure.

Uh so for one, there is an accurate comment that we do need secondary access.

We are aware of that.

But there's not only just two ways of getting access, and that doesn't have to be that particular route, and that doesn't have to be easement or right-of-way.

Uh also under fire code, you can add sprinkler systems to all buildings.

So I think a more appropriate way that that could have been written would be that fire code must be met for secondary access as approved by the fire marshal.

That's one example.

Uh a few other things.

Uh, we they talked about the uh NAT 88 vertical datum, but what we were actually using is the horizontal datum that's used for the basis of bearing, which are two different things.

So some of those details, you know, we'll get through them, we'll show them on the final plat.

Staff will be happy with that by the time we get through the process.

But uh I I prefer some of those comments not be crystallized in the formal preliminary plat approval at this stage.

Okay.

Any other comments so and this is probably more of staff than it is of you, the applicant.

Right.

But if we do this, then would this come back to planning commission at a later date so that we could see what actually is formalized?

Yes, yeah, yeah.

So this is um just the preliminary, of course it will come back as the conditional um, and that's um sometimes with some of these preliminary plots, there will be you know issues like you know, utility easements, maybe one lot is too big or too small or whatever.

Um and then those can kind of be figured out, solved, and you know, worked on together between staff and the applicant on that conditional final plat.

That's what I figured.

I just wanted to confirm then.

I have no other questions.

Okay.

All right, thank you.

Thank you all for your time.

So if we approve this without all that in there.

So it's is it it stays in there and they will work together and then come bring us back the conditional final plat that we will approve.

And they should staff should be um it should all conform to code, etc.

And staff should be perfectly fine with what it is when it comes back to uh conditional finals.

I think it's if staff feels okay moving forward with that is the big question.

Yeah.

Yeah.

I think um the large I mean, really the biggest thing um I think that we'll need to discuss probably with um the applicant is um that fire access stuff, you know.

There's a like you mentioned, there's a couple different things um that can be done to met those fire codes.

Um and so it's not necessarily it doesn't have to necessarily be just that secondary access or another access point.

Um like there's a couple of different things, sprinklers, number of lots, there's all these kinds of different uh factors that come in.

Part of it is also as well has to do with the fire marshals um approval.

What their kind of uh requirements are um so all of that of course would have to be figured out beforehand before we even come next uh next time to y'all with that conditional final plat.

Um so for right now, you know, this the preliminary plat, so that way um you know the applicants can work from this point on and you know um from there solve all these other issues.

Really, I think the biggest one is that um that fire access stuff um but um I think that's something that um that we can work with the applicant to solve and figure out before the conditional final plats um it's you want.

Okay, can you give it that, Jane?

So uh fire would need um all of their requirements to be met.

Um otherwise they're limited to 30 lots being approved.

Yeah, so as Eric mentioned, there are other ways to meet it in spring flooring the the units and back.

Um I'm confident we can work through that.

Okay, perfect.

Thank you.

You're welcome.

Thanks, Jose.

And one thing as well, if anything, when that conditional final plat um does come before you all, we can include a note in that report, you know how that was um you know solved or figured out.

Okay, that would be great.

That's helpful.

Okay.

All right.

Uh go ahead and close the public hearing and recommendations, motions.

I make a motion that we approve item four C.

Um with the knowledge that staff will be working with the applicant on all things noted for this preliminary application per staff's agreement.

I'll second.

All right, we have a motion and a second.

We've got a roll call vote, please.

Mindy Payne.

Yes.

Jonathan Townsend.

Yes.

Jayley Klempa.

Yes.

Jason Cohen.

Yes.

All right.

We'll go ahead and move on to item six, public hearings.

We'll move to 6A 26-435.

If staff could go over that, please.

I believe my understanding is there's no action being taken on this one.

Oh, I'm sorry.

I missed that.

Yes, the applicant has withdrawn six A.

So we'll move on to 6B.

26-441.

Yes.

This is public hearing consideration and possible action regarding PUD-002519-2025.

Major major amendment to PUD-0-307 and BAC-002633-2026.

Aspen Creek Villas, 90.33 acres, commercial heavy to single uh single family residential compact, located north of Tucson Street and approximately one quarter mile east of Olive Avenue.

PUD-002519-2025 is a major amendment to PUD 307.

The property is located north of Tucson and approximately one quarter mile east of Olive.

The land is currently unplatted.

This PUD major amendment and rezoning request proposes to change the underlying zoning from commercial heavy to single family residential compact.

This area is currently classified as level two urban residential under the land use intensity system via comp 001296-2024 that was approved by city council on May 7th, 2024.

Updated materials requested by the Broken Arrow Planning Commission at their February 26, 2026 meeting are still needed from the applicant.

For that reason, staff and the applicant are requesting to continue this item to the April 23rd, 2026 meeting of the broken arrow planning commission.

Based upon the need for updated material, staff recommends that PUD dash 002519-2025 and BAZ 002633-I think that's a typo should say my apologies should say uh BAZ-002633-2026 to be continued to the April 23rd, 2026 meeting of the broken arrow planning commission.

Thank you, Jose.

So the applicant is or the staff and applicants asking for this to be postponed until April 23rd.

Any I don't see anybody here to speak on this item.

So the applicant is here.

Okay.

Uh applicant, would you like to speak?

Like to speak, please.

You missed us.

That doesn't sound very positive.

Uh Alan Vetch and AB Engineering 200 North McKinley and Sand Springs.

Um yes, we're in agreement.

We've the takeaway that we had from the last planning commission was very clear that we're trying to come up with a more blended project.

Um that is a little more complicated.

Um and then it involves a lot of uh modifications to the PUD document once we even get to the site plan, which we're close on a site plan that it's in agreement with the developer and the proposed builder, and then we need to get all that back in front of staff for them to be able to review.

So it just is a it's a big tract and it's a lot of lots, and making sure that we can get something that meets what you need and that staff is comfortable support.

We're just not there yet.

Um so yes, please we would request that continuance.

Okay, thank you very much.

Did anybody have any comments or questions for the applicant?

No.

And thank you for coming.

Oh absolutely.

All right, we'll go ahead and close the public hearing.

Uh any additional comments or recommendations from the commission.

I'll make a motion to approve continue to continue.

To continue.

Item 6B to April 23rd 2026 meeting per staff recommendations.

I'll second.

We have a motion and a second.

Can we get the roll call vote, please?

Mindy Payne.

Yes.

Jonathan Townsend?

Yes.

Jaley Klempa?

Yes.

Jason Cohen.

Yes.

All right.

Item 6C 26-440.

Staff can review that, please.

Yes.

This is public hearing consideration and possible action regarding PUD-002694-2025.

Plan you develop Planned Unit Development.

PUD 001815 2024.

And PUD 000126-2022.

And community mixed use via BAZ 00012-2022 and PUD 000126 2022.

Located on the southeast corner of New Orleans and Aspen Avenue.

PUD 002694-2026.

Okay, so I um just to clarify, I guess I made a mistake in the title.

Um it should say PUD-002694 2026.

Um PUD-002694 2026 is a minor amendment to PUD-002316-2025 and PUD 000126 2022 and PUD 001815-2024.

This property is located on the southeast corner of Olive Avenue and N New Orleans Street.

This property is currently in the process of being platted in preparation for future development.

PUD-002316-2025 proposes to adjust certain lot width and frontage requirements for development area C.

The original the original PUD did not specify lot widths or frontage requirements falling back to the underlying zoning requirements.

These mutual access easements will be secured and dedicated within the plating process for this development.

According to FEMA Maps, none of the property in the 100 year floodplain, none of the property is in the 100-year flight floodplain, excuse me.

Water and sanitary sewer will be provided by the city of Broken Arrow.

Based on the location of the property and surrounding land uses, staff recommends PUD-002694-2025 be approved.

Was there any reason why I noticed on the document that it says uh minimum lot width zero feet and frontage zero feet?

Um the um the zoning ordinance kind of how it defines frontage um is that what uh that of the lot or property that abuts a public right-of-way.

Um if you're familiar with this development, part of the um development is going to be kind of located behind um another development area.

So there's kind of a development area to the uh bottom of it that it is accessed through mutual access easements.

Um so with that you know in mind, that's why they're requesting it to be zero.

Um having it as zero allows them to have access via mutual access easements instead of um requiring a frontage directly on a public right-of-way.

Okay.

Um just a concern is well, we'll let the applicant speak on that.

So is the applicant here and may come up, sir.

Thank you.

Eric Anyard again, Tanner Consulting at 5323 South Louis Avenue.

Sorry, there you go.

My voice is a little soft.

Uh you all are probably familiar with with this project.

We've been working on this for a few years now.

Uh we have done the as far as the conditional final plat, and as we were looking at it internally, we observed that something had changed between the preliminary plat and the final plat.

The uh multifamily, the townhouse style multifamily lot in the back has always intended to use access easements to uh to up to New Orleans and over to Olive.

The previous one had a little panhandle on the south end that has since been removed.

So we found this ourselves.

We knew that it needed to be taken care of.

We took the initiative to bring this to you and ask that you allow for the minor amendment to the PUD to allow that the that there's no technical street frontage, there's a lot width because lot width is to dependent on street frontage.

But this would only work if we have dedicated mutual access easements which are shown on our plat.

If you have any questions for me, I will do my best to answer it.

Yeah, I had a question.

Um how does um eliminating the frontage requirements, how does that impact like the walkability of the of the area or the connectivity?

Is that something you can speak to?

Sure.

Uh good question.

We actually do not intend to change that whatsoever.

There has always been a pedestrian connection along that mutual access easement to the north, and a pedestrian connection in that mutual access easement to the west olive.

So that has not changed.

Thank you for your clarification.

Any other questions?

No.

Okay.

Thank you.

Thank you all for your time.

And we don't have anybody to speak on this.

So we'll go ahead and close the public hearing.

Any recommendations or additional comments?

No, sir.

Okay.

I make a motion that we approve item 4C 26-440 per staff recommendation.

I'll second.

We have a motion and a second.

Roll call vote, please.

Mindy Payne.

No.

Jonathan Townsend.

Yes.

Jaley Klempa?

Yes.

Jason Cohen.

Yes.

All right.

Moving on to uh item seven appeals.

We have none.

Number eight, General Commission business.

Is there anything?

No.

Number nine, remarks, inquiries, and comments by the Planning Commission and staff.

No action can be taken.

I would love to thank staff for putting the wrap on in the New Orleans Square area.

That the kid had devi designed.

I reached out to the mayor and was like, can you help me find this?

And she was like, Yeah.

And she got it put on and it looks so pretty.

I'm by.

So it's the what are those called?

Electrical box?

The electrical and traffic control box.

Yes.

Oh my gosh.

And so it's uh has the butterfly on it and everything.

It's so pretty.

I'm gonna have to go by there and take a look.

Absolutely.

Yeah, well driving past it makes me happy.

Very good.

All right.

Anything else?

Thank you for this.

Okay.

Item 10.

Adjournment.

Make a motion to adjourn.

I'll second.

Oh, we have a motion and a second.

Today.

Commandy Payne.

Yes.

Jonathan Townsend.

Yes.

Jaley Clempa.

No.

Jason Cohen.

Yes.

It passed.

You love us.