We're here to speak on any items.

You gotta fill out one of the uh pink forms.

Turn it into the staff here.

If we could uh get a roll call, please.

Mindy Payne here.

Robert Gorenson?

Here.

Jayley Clempa.

Here, Jonathan Townsend.

Here.

Jason Cohen.

Here.

All right.

Uh all business, we have none.

Item four, consideration of the consent agenda.

We're gonna poll item four B.

Are there any other questions or comments regarding the uh consent agenda items?

Nope, none from me.

No, sir.

So I'll make a motion to approve item, I guess just 4A.

Um the consent agenda and polling for B as you say.

Second.

All right, we have a motion and a second.

Can we get a roll call vote, please?

Mindy Payne, yes.

Robert Gorenson?

Yes.

Jaylee Clempa.

Yes.

Jonathan Townsend?

Yes.

Jason Cohen.

Yes.

Now we'll move on to uh items removed from the consent agenda item 4B, if staff could go over that, please.

Thank you.

Um approval of PT 002741-2026, a conditional final plat for the Grove Phase 1, 33.66 acres, uh 105 lots, uh zoned A1 to RS3 via BAZ 001459 2024.

This property is located south of Jasper Street and west of 23rd Street, um, also known as 193rd East Avenue or County Line Road.

Um the original um early phases of this uh the preliminary plat included all three phases of this development.

Um right now tonight we're only looking at phase one during this excuse me city council meeting of September 17th, 2024 for the rezoning of this property.

It was noted that a traffic impact analysis would be performed for this development.

Uh staff has received the results of the traffic impact analysis in conjunction with this conditional final plat, um and it is included as an attachment uh to the staff report.

Uh the conclusion of the study showed that uh traffic would remain acceptable during phases one and two uh but would not be acceptable or would operate below acceptable levels at during phase three.

Um the community development director is working with the assistant city manager and the streets director um to review the proposed um mitigation options and will determine what is the best option to alleviate that.

Uh we don't expect that phase three will be coming forward till around the year 2030.

Um so we're comfortable with going forward with phase one at this time.

Uh according to FEMA maps, uh there is uh no 100 year floodplain within phase one, it's uh further west at a later phase.

This conditional final plat was reviewed by the technical advisory committee on July 14th.

Uh staff and the TAC committee uh recommend approval of the conditional final plat for the groves subject to the comments attached with the staff report.

Um and so staff uh is available to answer any questions.

Thank you very much.

You're welcome.

Any questions for staff?

No, I asked for that to be pulled, so that's since council had asked for the traffic study.

I wanted clarification on the traffic study and great job.

Thank you.

You answered everything.

Okay so I'm okay with it.

You're good with it?

Okay as long as it's just the phase one.

I believe someone is here on behalf of the applicant.

Okay.

Did anybody have any questions for the applicant since we pulled this item?

I don't.

It was mainly for staff.

Okay.

So I'll make a motion to approve items for B per staff recommendations.

Second.

We have a motion and a second for item 4B.

If we can get a roll call vote, please.

Mindy Payne, yes.

Robert Gorenson, yes.

Jaylee Clempa, yes.

Jonathan Townsend, yes, Jason Cohen.

Yes.

Thank you.

Uh that will go before City Council on Monday, August 3rd at 6 30 in these uh in this chamber.

Moving on to item six, public hearings 6A 26-1109.

If staff could review that, please.

Uh yes, of course.

PUD 002941, a planned unit development major amendment to PUD 28, uh located at 807 West Houston Street.

Um, it's an 8.06 acre site located south of Houston and west of Elm Place.

Um the applicant uh since we published the public hearing notice, the applicant requested uh to withdraw this application.

Um and so just as a courtesy saying it has been uh noticed, we're just um letting you know that it is withdrawn and no um action is required.

Okay.

Thank you.

Um did we have anybody that wanted to speak on this at all?

No.

There's no public hearing.

So there's no public hearing.

Okay, thank you, sir.

All right, so that is withdrawn.

Moving on to item 6B 26-1127.

If staff could go over that, please.

Yes, this is a public hearing consideration and possible action regarding PUD-002918-2026, planned unit development, a major amendment to PUD 111, 7 Brew Kenosha on 0.70 acres, Commercial General, located north of West, uh excuse me, located north of West Kenosha Street, also known as 71st Street and west of South Aspen Avenue, also known as 14 uh 145th East Avenue.

PUD-002918-2026 is a requested PUD major amendment to PUD 111 of the Sonic PUD.

PUD 111 was approved by the Broken Arrow City Council on March 16th, 1998.

PUD 111 was created as part of the development of the former Sonic restaurant uh location at the subject property.

The sonic location closed in recent years, and the structure and property are currently unused and vacant.

During pre-development discussions, the developer was made aware of the existing PUD.

After reviewing the existing PUD, the applicant identified parking as the only requirements that would conflict with the proposed site plan development.

Thus the applicant has come forward with an application to amend PUD 111.

The request would modify parking standards from the required seven employee parking spaces and 31 customer parking spaces to require solely the seven employee parking spaces.

Seven Brew, a quick server uh beverage facility, operates solely as a drive-thru business with no indoor or outdoor seating.

Based upon the location of the property and the surrounding land uses, staff recommend PUD-002918-2026 be recommended for approval to the Broken Arrow City Council.

Uh and the applicant is here and is in agreement.

Okay, thank you.

Um Commissioner, have any comments or questions for staff?

I I had a quite a question just for staff, and it was just uh very similar to the issue we had recently reminded me a lot about it.

So I just wanted to ask about you know what what type of study or consideration was done as far as stacking goes.

Um we talked a lot recently about another one that might be could be spilling into the street and that type of thing.

So just kind of wonder what that conversation was like and the sense of comfort to ensure that it's not spilling out into the street into neighbor's neighboring properties.

For sure, yeah.

Um a lot of it kind of especially with the stacking spaces.

Um, I mean, we at the ordinance only really requires um the minimum of the four stacking spaces.

Um and I'll have to I don't recall exactly, but um I think with this seven brew and a lot of other drive-throughs now they have you know two windows or um or sorry the two boards um to order.

Um and I can't remember how our ordinance treats that if it's now you need four because you have or sorry, now you need eight stacking spaces because you have two um menu boards, or if it's four for the two menu boards alone.

Um I don't remember off the top of my head what that um number looks like.

Um but on the um conceptual site plan for this um project, you know, you can see they have a pretty good amount of you know stacking spaces.

Um and really in terms of you know, kind of the study and discussion on you know whether that could overflow into Kenosha, um we haven't had one.

Um I'll be honest in that regards.

Um, but I think a lot of times we rely, you know, on the developers and property owners to you know kind of be their um kind of look ahead on their own and for those issues um because you know, of course, the future um you know business, you know, seven brew, if they're having issues with people out in the street, um, or going into the um that drive is actually um there's a little bit of a mutual access easement on the front, um, and then I think there's an O'Reilly's or an advanced auto parts right there.

Okay, and so um so if say if it was an issue where you know cars are you know stacking into the advanced um auto parts um business, um you know, then that would be um an issue with code enforcement and of course working with um you know that department to you know make sure that's not um you know affecting those other businesses.

Yeah.

Thank you for that.

And also uh just with this the amended PUD, uh remind me again like if would things change if there was a different tenant in the future, say there's someone else who who's in in control, do they have to go back to like the city standards or did they get to have their uh lesson amount of parking requirement too?

Yeah, the um the PUD would stick with the property and the and the structure, and so if Seven Brew for some reason, you know, moved on and um wasn't at that location anymore and another business came in.

Right.

Um I think we'll one of the difficulties would be in the the way the seven brew um how their developments are built, they're kind of special made almost for that type of business.

Yeah, it'd be hard for I think for like a chicken business to come in and set up in there or something.

Um so I think that will kind of be one thing if anything, if in the future, you know they're not there and someone else was looking at it, they might see that.

Um to answer your question, yes.

You know, these um these would be things that would apply to the next property owner.

Um, and they would have to come and you know do a PUD amendment.

And that's kind of why uh you know we're here now.

You know, before it was Sonic, they're gone, and now we've got someone else new, and um and they're looking to redevelop the property and all that.

Well, thank you.

So they're gonna completely tear everything down that's out there, right?

Yes, sir.

That's my understanding.

Okay.

Any other questions for staff?

Would the applicant come up, please?

Hello, good afternoon.

Good afternoon.

Hi, if you would state your name, you'll have 10 minutes to share whatever you want.

Yeah, uh Charles Vantioni.

Um I represent Creftental, who represents Seven Brew uh for this restaurant.

Um as Jose said, it's a coffee restaurant.

Um only drive through.

There is no sit down, there is no outside seating.

Excuse me, the majority of the orders are done online, mobile app.

Um Seven Brew is able to uh pump through customers in less than two minutes each.

Uh so the the question about the stacking is is not too much of a concern as far as Seven Brew, uh the way they run their business.

As you saw too, there was a stacking of 21 before you even reached the max.

Um we're look as he said, we're looking to specifically reduce the amount of required parking in that um because Seven Brew doesn't have the inside seating, doesn't have outside seating, customers aren't meant or designed to park there and go in and get coffee or sit down and stay.

It's specifically designed to stay in your car uh and drive through, as I'm sure some of you guys have experienced in other seven brews.

Uh so that's what this request for is to just minimize the amount of parking so that we can fit the development on the the property itself.

So are all three of those drives, are they all mutual access?

All three of them that are going in off Kenosha Street.

Are they all mutual access to all to all three?

Car washed, auto advanced auto and yourself.

Yes, sir.

For my understanding they are.

Was there any talk about cutting back on the one curb cut right in front of you?

Was there any talk about?

I was just curious.

I don't believe there was any talks about that.

Our design was not we were not trying to redo the the drivers that I was just curious.

Yes, sir.

Yeah, I know sometimes we try to eliminate some of those that if there's a causing traffic back up.

So you are taking the whole building down and starting those.

Yes.

Yes, we are completely demoing the building, the sonic stalls that they normally have, as well as most of the asphalt will be re repaved and look real nice.

Just like an empty fast field going in there, so that'd be good.

I think it'll be makes it easier.

You all use those prefaberic.

Thank you.

I'm happy if it's not settings, you know, breaking down and it's gonna be new and pretty.

Any other questions for the applicant?

No.

No.

Okay.

Uh thank you.

We may call you back up if there's people that wanted to speak on this.

Absolutely.

Thank you.

All right, thank you.

Uh, did we have anybody that wanted to speak or any emails?

No.

Okay.

Well, are there any other questions, comments, or recommendations?

Make a motion we approve this item per staff recommendation.

I'll second the motion.

We have a motion and a second.

Can we get a roll call vote, please?

Mindy Payne, yes.

Robert Garenson?

Yes.

J.

Lee Klempa, yes.

Jonathan Townsend?

Yes.

Jason Cohen.

Yes, and that will go before City Council on Monday, August 3rd at 6 30 in these chambers.

I didn't get my yes in.

All right, moving on to item 6C uh 26-1145.

If staff could go over that, please.

Yes, good evening.

PUD 002951-2026 is a request for a planned unit development permit for a municipal salt dome as an accessory use to the public right-of-way.

The city owned property is zoned agricultural and is located one half miles south of Kenosha Street, east of 23rd Street, at the northeast corner of 23rd and College Street.

The city acquired the property in 2019 when it was 2.19 acres, and after allocating some of that area for the bridge embankment to widen the 23rd Street Bridge over Highway 51 and allowing for some drainage on the site.

It left the site at 1.09 acres.

With the irregular shape and limited access to the site, made it difficult to try to meet different dimensional requirements.

Also, the nature and use of the salt dome does not lend itself to meeting the aesthetic requirements of the highway overlay district, as it includes concrete base with an arched metal truss structure covered with vinyl fabric.

The applicant is planning for the vinyl fabric to be green in color to blend better with the environment.

It is strictly a municipal facility intended to address roadway safety during icing conditions and only will only be used a limited number of days per year, depending on when the winter storms occur.

Fencing is proposed to be chain link or similar non-opaque material due to the site constraints after accounting for this uh salt dome.

I'm sorry, I have a typo in there, and needing to include a dry pond on the site.

The PUD also requests that no landscaping be required.

There's also an existing billboard at the billboard easement near the southeast corner of the site that limits access to the site.

Um properties around it are zoned mostly industrial.

Um to the north and east are level three.

To the south and west are level six.

Um and so the deviations that are requested with this PUD are to not have any frontage requirements or setback requirements.

The building height uh would be per the zoning ordinance.

Um the use as the minor utility facility isn't allowed use in the agricultural district.

Um they're requesting no parking requirements, uh, the chain link fence, um, that the landscaping requirements not uh be required, um, and that the aesthetic requirements uh regarding the highway overlay district not be required.

So according to section six-three-four point three of the zoning ordinance, uh, one of five purposes are to be met in order to approve a PUD and then staff's opinion.

Um this request satisfies items two and five of that section, and that the site is atypical and that it is small and has an irregular shape with limited access.

Locating the salt dome to a more central location in the city will provide a public benefit, and that salt trucks will be able to service roadways in a timelier manner.

Um, and then number five, the use of the site as a salt dome is an accessory use to the right-of-way and will aid in providing safe travel on rights of way during icing conditions and will support the city's overall infrastructure.

There is no floodplain on the property, and water and sanitary service are available from the city.

So, based on the comprehensive plan, the location of the property, and the surrounding land uses, staff recommends that PUD 002951-2026 be approved.

Um, I'm happy to answer questions, and the city's project manager is here to also answer any questions.

Thank you very much for that.

You want to uh any questions for staff?

Did the applicant have any additional information they wanted to share?

None unless we have any questions.

Anybody have any questions for we're requesting zero landscaping or saying nothing?

Part of it is uh due to the the area constraints of the site.

Um that's what I was wanting to size.

The engineers are also working on how to contain um any salt brine.

Right.

Uh they don't think that landscaping would survive.

That's what I was wondering.

And it needs to be properly filtered before any water can flow off the site.

That's what I was wondering if it's seeping in the ground, if it just killed the vegetation around it or something anyway.

And you were gonna say that's correct.

That is correct.

Hello, my name is Shannon Marshall.

I'm the special projects division manager with engineering and construction for the city of Broken Arrow.

So this one is special as it is before you today.

Thank you, Jane, for the presentation.

But yes, because of the limitations of the site, and we're trying to enclose the salt.

I don't know if any of you have driven, you know, the property, the city property behind Rema had a salt barn there for a while, and over time had been damaged.

There was a big hole in it for a while.

And so, in order to keep that type of material covered for the uses, a lot of times our streets and stormwater department.

I don't know if you guys have prepared for Christmas yet, but they have prepared for bad weather.

They've already ordered the salt for this upcoming winter season to make sure that we are adequate adequately supplied and not you know surprised.

So, because of that, we have to acquire a lot of materials such as this, and they're utilizing a new system.

I don't know if you guys heard about the brine, the salt tanks that mix salt and water, and then it goes into the specialty equipment trucks that then pre-treat the roads and continue to treat during weather events.

So that is the request for the project.

So, what will this service?

I know this doesn't have anything to do with what we're talking about.

What will this service?

Will it just be like east side broken out, or will this be north and east, or will it be almost all over?

The entire city.

Okay.

Currently, we have salt located in at least three different locations right now, and we're trying to centralize it to this primary location, but just the salt material itself.

There will be no, you know, salt trucks will not be stored on this site.

There's no gonna be no operation, like no um uh employees sited at this site, there's nothing like that there.

Yeah, so you so you don't want it in three different places?

You uh would rather have it centralized in one place?

Currently, yes.

Is that easier or as it relates to being in different parts of the city?

Is there no advantage to being over here and over here and over here versus all in one place?

So the thought for behind that is that they can order a larger amount here and it can be better controlled here.

Um we have currently there is salt up north at the public safety training complex with that police and fire share.

Um, the streets of stormwater has done a small pile over there as well.

Um, and then there's some down south.

So they're looking at majority of it at this location in the central portion, also to be closer to access to the highway, both the turnpike and um the highway 51 corridor um and things like that.

Okay, so access to the highway, and and what else did you mean by controlled?

You said it can be better controlled.

I might then understand that part.

Okay, so um kind of the leaching aspect of it right now.

The salt is on like an older pavement area, and then there's tarps over it, um, and so it's not enclosed, so wind and things like that weather can affect it.

Thank you.

So the top will be a green color where it won't look so bad from our new bridge and the highway.

Yeah, it'll be a green colored tarp.

I don't know if you guys have driven creek turnpike um down over by Riverside Exit there along south.

Um, they o dot has put up a couple of salt barns, and maybe also if you've taken the turnpike down to Oklahoma City, they have a couple of salt barn barns and those kind of niche facilities, kind of tucked right into the exit and on ramp there.

So kind of utilizing that this unique shape for a singular purpose.

Yeah, and there's one just over by the where the creek turnpike and 51 highway out there on the east side by bronze and all that stuff.

There's one over there about the same.

So any other questions or comments for the applicant?

Thank you very much.

Thanks, John.

Did we have I did uh sorry, I did ask about the vegetation in case somebody comes up at another time and says, Well, why did you weigh the vegetation over there?

Well, it's the seepage of the salt in there, probably gonna kill the vegetation.

That's the reason why.

So we actually want to bring that up because of that.

Yes, Mr.

Gorison.

We're designing the um the site area, the concrete and asphalt right outside of it, the site, grading it to a catch basin first.

But this is the top of Broken Arrow Creek.

We are aware of that, so we're trying to catch it all and capture it before it potentially um releases.

Okay.

Thank you.

Did we have anybody that wanted to speak or any emails on this?

No.

Okay.

Any uh additional comments, recommendations, motions.

I'll move to approve their staff recommendation.

I'll second.

We have a motion and a second for item six C.

We get a roll call vote, please.

Mindy Payne, yes.

Robert Gorenson.

Yes, J.

Lee Klempa.

Yes, Jonathan Townsend, yes, Jason Cohen.

Yes, and that will go before city council on Monday, August 3rd at 6 30 in these chambers.

Move on to item 6D 26 1119.

If staff could go over that, please.

Yes, of course.

BAZ 002954-2026.

Is a request to change the zoning designation on 38.39 acres from agricultural to commercial general for a commercial development.

Commercial general zoning is allowed in level six.

And the property is located at the northwest corner of Tucson Street or 121st Street and Aspen Avenue, also known as 145th East Avenue.

In their meeting of April 19th, 2016, the City Council approved a rezoning of this site from agricultural to commercial heavy, subject to the property being platted.

This property was never platted, and under the previous zoning ordinance, plating was required before a zone change could take effect.

Therefore, the ordinance has not been prepared and the CH zoning was never codified.

In their meeting of October 23rd, 2025, the planning commission approved a lot split to split a 0.69 acre uh lot from this overall site.

Um and this current request includes both that lot and the overall area.

Transportation plan for the Broken Arrow next comprehensive plan identifies a future frontage road along the south side of the creek turnpike in the vicinity of this property.

Um other properties to the west of this site have either dedicated 80 feet of right-of-way or will be dedicating additional right-of-way for the frontage road as part of their platting process.

This project will also be required to dedicate the right-of-way for the frontage road.

Uh the initial preliminary plat that staff is reviewing shows an 80-foot right-of-way.

Um as we work through the plat, it will have to be adjusted some so that it aligns with the 80-foot right-of-way and the property to the west.

It's just a slight jog, um, but it's something we can do.

How much are adjust how much adjustment are we talking about, Jane?

30 feet, 20 feet, or is it that is it very far off?

I'll see if I can pull that up.

Um I don't have it right in front of me right now though.

Okay, I was just curious.

Okay, so the surrounding land uses to the north is level six and floodplain.

Um to the east is level six, to the south is levels two and floodplain, and to the west is level three and floodplain.

And I probably should have stayed with each site for zoning.

Uh the north has agricultural zoning and the creek turnpike with the vacant land beyond that.

To the east is commercial zoning and is under construction for the Hackberry Marketplace with um Home Depot Hobby Lobby and other businesses.

To the south across Tucson Street is single family residential and some vacant land beyond that.

To the west has multifamily residential development and some floodplain.

According to FEMA maps, a portion of the west side of the property is located within the 100-year floodplain.

Uh no development is proposed in that part of the site.

Water and sanitary sewer are available from the city of Broken Arrow.

And so based on the comprehensive plan, the location of the property, and the surrounding land uses, staff recommends that BAZ 002954-2026 be approved.

I'm happy to answer questions, and um both co-application are here.

Thank you.

Any additional questions, comments for staff?

I do have a question on their plan that they're showing here.

Um I am not seeing if the right-of-way.

It looks like the right-of-way is part of it and that they have not dedicated that yet.

Am I correct in the way I'm looking at this, or is the right of way to the north?

Of their block two.

We are um adjusting the frontage road um slightly so that it will come down Chestnut Avenue and meet opposite Chestnut Avenue across Tucson Street rather than going out to Aspen Avenue.

And actually, um, if IT can zoom in on the top left corner there, we can see where the 80-foot right-of-way is for.

Yeah, that's I was thinking.

So there's a reserve area uh to the west, and then there's the 80-foot right-away.

Um yeah, we might be 20-30 feet off there.

Okay, that's 20.

So it'll have to be adjusted.

Okay.

Okay.

That's all I have to do.

It's not a showstopper.

It just needs to be coordinated.

Yes, yeah, and it's it's something we'll work through with the operation.

When I heard the staff notice that adequate adequately, whatever the word is, adequately.

I thought how far off is it?

So but it's it's workable.

Yes, very much so.

Any additional questions for staff?

Would the applicant come up, please?

If you would please state your name, you'll have uh 10 minutes.

Steve Wallman, Walmart Commercial Real Estate.

Anyone have any questions for the applicant, or is there anything you wanted to add?

No, the intention, just some color.

I didn't know the site plan was on there, but our intention is to uh we previously finished Tiger Hill Plaza up on the north end of Broken Arrow.

Uh we worked on the McDonald's and Tulsa Federal site, and uh we're actively working other sites in South Broken Arrow, and our vision here is to create something a little softer than hard boxes.

This is an impression point into the city, in my opinion, is an impression point into South Broken Arrow, and I think it would be well served by something more neighborhood, Tiger Hill type and quality uh services, restaurants, uh those type of uh uh services to the community.

And then we think obviously with the gravity that the retail and the future retail is going to bring to the market that you know opportunity to provide more out parcels for more restaurants and and other providers is going to be uh uh necessary, and uh again, I think it will create a much higher end look coming into the market, and so that's what we do, and that's what we'd like to continue to do.

I am curious because the way it's configured, it almost is configured kind of like a neighborhood.

Are you like trying to um oh what's the word I'm looking for?

Um promote walking from shop to shop and restaurant.

Yeah, we'll have we're working on you know covered walks down our fronts, uh the center of the space because that intersection lines up with Hackberry.

Everybody's coming out and they're looking right at that center.

We want it to be something very attractive.

And we're working in that center.

You know, at one point we looked at a road going through the tying into the other road.

Uh either way, we're gonna have large patios and soft points right there to create a nice, you know, inviting environment.

Um so yes, we're we're trying to do something that ties it all together and and makes it a place people want to go hang out, have dinner, you know, spend a little bit of time.

Yep, sounds good to me.

Don't you have a billboard on your side on there on the north side right now?

Pardon me?

Don't you have a billboard on the north side right there?

Yes, yes, sir.

And that's not an issue, right?

That's not gonna be an issue.

No, uh, I'm a little concerned on the elevation of it.

Okay.

Uh I do have the right to terminate that.

Oh, okay.

If you know, unlike a lot of those contracts.

Um but you know, it's an issue we haven't kind of explored yet.

Uh so that's just between you two partisans, so that's not going to cause us a problem either then.

Yeah, it is uh you know, depending on topography and how we tie in and everything, uh, kind of give us an idea of of what we have to do to do it or what the billboard has to do in order to maintain the structure.

Have you thought about the walkway from the trail across the highway?

Uh from the west?

From either side.

Uh yeah, if if someone builds a bridge or puts a pathway across there or comes around the south side, you know, there's going to be uh walking paths all the way through the whole center.

In fact, there's you know, I just did the price out on it, and the city's requirements on curbing and paving for that road are significant, and we're gonna be doing that in addition to ours.

So, yeah.

We want everybody, you know.

Pedestrian traffic isn't exactly a predominant means these days of transportation into retail, but yes, we want to make it so that the apartments, the people across the street, they can ride their bikes over there and and uh hang out and come back over if they want.

If I can add, um, some of the early conceptual plans did show a roadway coming straight through the center of the site from Aspen, and it just seemed to disrupt that common area that they were um had in mind for pedestrians uh for dining patios, whatever.

Um and so that's why we're deviating where the front edge road comes out so that the site can remain more walkable.

Otherwise, it just bisected the whole site.

It makes sense if you're coming off ass, but then there's gonna be discussion about some uh light over there, right?

Yes, so yeah, yeah.

I think chestnut yeah, chestnut.

Once that road widens, there's some there's some elevation and how to tie that in, and then uh there's a good argument for a traffic signal.

Yeah, I think we're better off coming off.

I'm sorry, what was that?

Yeah, I think you're better off coming on the off the other street than Aspen, to be honest with you, for this, and any if it's the frontage road, too.

So any other comments or questions for the applicant.

And you're okay with realigning the frontage road to tie into it, right?

Yeah, we're we're continuing to work to try and get that all aligned.

Uh our last pre-developed meeting, we were kind of for some reason.

We thought they were off on the south road.

So uh yeah, we have to long as y'all work it out into it.

Yep.

We'll work it out.

Uh the neighboring sites to the west also had to adjust it because of the lease areas for the billboards along the termpike.

Right.

I remember so they put in reserve areas to accommodate the billboards and then the right of way.

And that's why I was asking about the billboards that in order to make sure that wasn't gonna be an issue right there.

So it sounds like it's not.

Especially since you have control over it by no terminal.

Okay.

All right.

We're good.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Did we have anybody that wanted to speak or any emails on this item?

Nothing.

Okay.

Any other comments or suggestions or motions?

Question.

In the motion, do we need to put in there that they are working with staff for that right-of-way road?

Okay.

I think it's in the staff report.

So I think it'll be good with the Indian Springs Sports Complex and the tournaments and everything they have down there.

Having some restaurants nearby, I'll bring in some revenue.

Or that hotel, yeah.

That is some places there they can like just kind of come and sit and hang out between games.

Yeah, exactly.

I've spent many of weekends out there with my kids.

So to go back to your earlier question, that recommendations usually covers that residual.

I just want to make sure that that's that road has been brought up several times.

Yes, it has.

I wanted to make sure we had that covered.

Okay.

Yeah.

Be a little bit more detailed on those.

Sorry.

Okay, any other uh comments, questions, motions.

You can do it.

Okay.

I'll make a motion to approve item six D per staff recommendations.

Second.

We have a motion and a second.

Can we get a roll call vote, please?

Mindy Payne, yes.

Robert Gorenson.

Yes.

J Lee Clempa.

Yes.

Jonathan Townsend.

Yes.

Jason Cohen.

Yes.

And that will go before City Council on Monday, August 3rd at 630 p.m.

Uh next item 6E 26-1134.

If staff could go over that, please.

Yes, this is a uh public hearing consideration and possible action regarding PUD-002953-2026, and BAZ-002952-2026.

Creekside commercial, 101.90 acres.

Um, AG Agricultural and CH Commercial Heavy to CH Commercial Heavy, Industrial Light, or sorry, IL industrial light, RMF residential multifamily, and RSC single family residential compact.

Located south of East Kenosha Street, also known as 71st Street, north of East Houston Street, also known as 81st Street.

Um one half mile east of 37th, also known as 209th, and along the east boundary of the Creek Turnpike, also known as State Highway 364.

PUD-002953-2026 and BAZ-002952-2026 are a plan unit development and rezoning request on approximately 101.90 acres of vacant land north of the uh north of East Houston Street and east of the Creek Turnpike.

Comp 002721-2026, a request to change the comprehensive plan on the southern portion of the property from level six regional commercial employment to level three transitional area and level two urban residential.

This request was approved at the May 19th, 2026 meeting of the Broken Arrow City Council.

This amendment is not yet reflected within the attached comprehensive plan map.

Uh the proposed development outline for PUD-002953-2026 details four development areas with different zoning and allowed uses.

Development area A, located in the northwestern portion, focuses on commercial uses surrounding the central jurisdiction.

Excuse me, surrounding the central jurisdictional stream and waterway.

Development area B situated in the northeastern portion is dedicated to industrial uses, utilizing its southernmost lots to serve as a critical transitional buffer into adjacent residential zones.

Development area C is uh occupying the southwestern portion, and it is reserved for either a high density multifamily uh development or supportive commercial uses.

Uh and then development area D is located in the southeastern portion and is designated exclusively for single uh single family compact residential housing.

Uh the site is bisected by an existing jurisdictional stream and waterway, which will serve as the backbone for a communal open space open for residents and visitors.

Um this open space will include a trails and other sidewalk connections to facilitate travel and recreation.

Um this site is also proposed to be served by a collector style road connecting from uh Houston Street from Kenosha Street to Houston Street.

Um based upon the location of the property, or actually I had um forgotten to include the surrounding land uses table on this report.

Um so let me go ahead and um repeat that from the comp plan report.

Um the surrounding land uses to the north.

Um it is currently level six, the zoning is agricultural and the land use is vacant um and agricultural.

Um to the east, um, it is level three, the current zoning is agricultural and it's current currently vacant in agricultural.

Um to the south.

Um to the south there's a highway interchange, uh, so there isn't really a zoning or a comp plan necessarily for that area to directly to the south.

Um to the west it is level six uh and it is zoned industrial light um in PUD uh 002489-2025.

Um land use is currently vacant and agricultural.

Um so based upon the location of the property, surrounding land uses, um, existing and planned transportation infrastructure.

Staff recommends that PUD-002953 2026 and BAZ-002952-2026 be recommended for approval.

Uh the applicant uh is in agreement and they are here as well.

Okay, thank you.

Any questions for staff?

We have the applicant come up, please.

And if you would please state your name, you'll have 10 minutes.

Nicole Watts, Wallace Design Collective, one, two, three, North Martin Luther King Um Boulevard Tulsa.

Um this is the creekside commercial that we were here a couple months ago talking about the comprehensive plan.

Um this PUD is a little bit more detailed than what you saw with the comp plan um talking about the four different um development areas, the commercial on the west, uh industrial commercial on the east with the transition to the existing um industrial part um to the east.

We've got uh the multifamily in the southwest corner, and then we have single family on the south side.

Um, as it was discussed, there is jurisdictional streams um through the middle of the property that we are planning to enhance, use it as detention facilities and have walking trails and make it part of uh the development as well, trying to create more of a community for it.

Um the PUD does talk about the screening requirements that we have, landscaping buffer requirements that there are um the the type of materials required for the you know the the buildings and everything like that.

Didn't know what kind of questions you guys had for it.

Questions?

Actually, I have a few items I want to talk to you about.

I am surprised.

I am actually I really like the development.

I really I mean I do live just a couple miles east of there, but really that collector road in there is gonna be great to have that in there.

And so I think it's a good.

I think you got a great mix in here.

Thank you.

But I still have you still have some items I got to talk about.

Okay.

So I noticed on the and you're right.

I'm you know, you had the conceptual site plan at the comp plan change, and we're not locked into that.

Right.

So along your collector road at the on the northeast corner there where the the residentials tying in, you had a roundabout, and I'm roundabout fan, but you took that off there.

Was that because of the turning movement like coming out heading north, or why was that taken out?

It was I'm just curious.

Just for the flow, just with um looking at the flow, the lot sizes, um, roundabouts take up a lot a lot of area.

And so when we started kind of detailing it out more, um, we chose just to remove it and use it, you use different um tools for traffic control.

Actually, I think it's gonna be better for the better for the people coming out of the residential when they're heading north to go to Kenosha, it's it's gonna be easier because some of the idiots are some of the people are gonna turn and go the wrong way.

You can't drive them very well, can they sometimes people say that, but yeah, you can you can do it?

You can do it.

I mean, go to Carmel Indiana, they got what, 130 of them or whatever over there, anyway.

So your collector road, Ms.

Watts going from the from the from Houston Street to Kenosha, that's a long ways along the residential.

Is that an industrial, commercial, or residential collector street?

What would y'all call that?

Reason why I say that is because the right-of-way is different for each one of those, like 80, 85, and 60 or whatever it is, and then you got the width of the road that's gonna be different depending on whether it's residential, commercial, industrial.

How is that being treated on this design?

I'm just curious because it's a long stretch.

It is a long stretch, and again, you know, we'll have to work through it because you know the code requires that every 900 feet you either have stop signs or some sort of thing, so we still have to you know work through that with the you know the the design of it.

So the rightway is all 80 feet.

Um so the plan is um on the north end through the commercial and the industrial, it's gonna be a three-lane road through there, so it's gonna be wider um to for the to be able to have turning movements into the lots and everything.

Umce you get down to by the residential, it will just be a large wider two-lane road um through there because there is no requirement for having a third lane through there, you know, for turning except into the uh residential subdivisions.

Right.

Yeah.

I mean, you're not doing you you you you can't get through the residential on the back end because you're not allowing that anyway.

So you're gonna have it basically industrial collector on the top and then residential.

Yes, sir.

So it's gonna change.

Okay.

So the long stretch, I didn't measure that.

What is that?

1500 feet?

20, 2,000 feet, maybe it's not not quite a half a mile.

So that is a long stretch, and like you said, the 900 feet is what kind of what we put a limit on.

Right.

So what kind of traffic control measures are not calming measures, but what traffic control?

Because usually the traffic control may measures come after it's built, right?

So or traffic calming.

Right.

So what are y'all gonna have?

If if you're not gonna put any kind of jogs or anything like that, how are you going to slow the traffic down from people racing behind people's houses back then?

Right.

So um, one of the things that we're looking at again, you know, we'll we'll have to be working through it with during the plating process, but um what we've used in some of the other subdivisions is you know, creating like a medians in the middle to to you know to to widen it out to make it slow down to come around that way.

We're also talking to the development to the east that um those single family those that it's been approved for zoning, they haven't moved forward yet with the cluster houses.

They are talking about possibly putting a um entrance off of the road there, so if we do that, then that can possibly put either a roundabout or you know, stop sign or something that can create a point as well.

Um, but we do know that we're gonna have to do some sort of measures along that road.

We just haven't fully designed it yet.

And you hit it like where that pond is right there, if there was some kind of roundabout right there just to slow the traffic, and it's in the engineering design manual, so I would imagine y'all is gonna address it, but I I don't think by us if we were to approve of it is a proven not having one in the army.

Correct.

So if engineering design manual calls out for that.

Yes.

So the stub street that you have on the west side of the residential, and I'm not picking on you.

I'm trying to educate myself too.

So the res the stub street on the west side there, that would be a pretty decent bridge to cross that right there.

Is that what is the intent of that stub street?

So we put that in there for now.

I don't know if we're uh we'll end up with there, but the possibility of you know, depending on what develops in that multifamily um tract, they may require to have to have two access points.

Right, right.

That's right.

Um and so the thought was if we put a stub there um to allow the second access, you know, if that develop if that multifamily develops and they need it, then that would be on the multi-family development to put whatever crossing they would have to put in for that access point.

But just being so long and narrow that you know, getting the the um the spacing between the two access points, um, we'll probably need to have something down there for them.

And uh and I wanted to ask you that because you're overseeing the whole PUD, so you have to have an idea of what's going in there, and you're probably right, they'd probably want to have two access points to get in and out.

Okay, so the other question I have is the sidewalks.

Yes.

I mean, we're really good on the residential on the sidewalks for what I could tell, or in the PUD uh description here, narrative.

Uh-huh.

The sidewalks, you're going along the south west southwest from the new development, going across what's going in the next east of you.

You're going over there.

You're also gonna go along the residential, you could see it right there.

And that then you're gonna dead end right there.

Why aren't we taking that up to tie in maybe the shoulders of the of Houston Street to where people could travel across that, go over the turnpike, go to 209th and head the sidewalk there that heads all the way to Kenosha?

Was there any talk about that?

Escrow or anything like that?

So the the reason why we were uh requesting not to put it along Houston was uh the steepness of the grades out there, it's pretty unsafe.

Um when we came what so when we came and uh a couple months ago on the west side of the turnpike when we did that PUD for the storage units and and everything, we did not require the sidewalks along Houston on that PUD based on the um the the um grades and the turnpike.

So and our thinking um was if we did not do it on the west side of the turnpike due to the turnpike, the grades and everything that we did not want to do it on the east side as well because you would have lead up to nowhere.

And I I've been out there twice.

Like I said, I live east of there a couple of miles, so I drive by there all the time.

I think you could put the sidewalk in there myself, but it would have to tie into the shoulders because it you could you would want to cross the turnpike any other place.

Right.

It would have to go the shoulders.

So I was just curious if y'all looked at taking it to that point.

And if you weren't gonna put in the sidewalk, then would we put that into escrow?

Would be my question.

Uh that I was just bringing that up.

So that's just something to discuss whether it needs to go escrow.

I think you could get the sidewalk in.

So you think taking a sidewalk along Houston to the shoulder of would the city allow it to for the approaches going over the turnpike, tie it into the shoulder, let people cross the turnpike, because the bridge has little access walkway right there.

Then you could take it and the should the sidewalk dead ends, but maybe the city with their bond issue with the sidewalks that they have for that.

Put a little sidewalk in there to tie it in 2009, then you got a sidewalk all the way to Casey's.

I mean pedestrian connectivity is a big thing.

Sure, and I understand it.

And um, I just I mean, we can look at it.

Uh you know, I just like I said, when we did the the PUD on the west side of the turnpike, and we had conversations and we didn't put the sidewalk in there because of the you know, the traffic and and the steepness and everything, that's why I just didn't put on the east side.

Well, like I said, it's I gotta I gotta bring the stuff up.

So now on the PUD narrative.

Yes.

Okay, in the in there, uh you have I think it's development A and B.

Uh-huh.

There's a building height limitation of 35 feet, except for then you also have a statement in there about the I guess it's just the I'd have to read the statement now.

But let me go back and look at that.

Bear with me a second.

Two stories for thirty or three or five feet for buildings abutting the residential, no limitations for all others.

Yes, and you know what, if you look at the PUD requirements in our zoning ordinance, it talks about the prescribed.

And when I read the prescribed, that actually gives us a number.

You know, we're looking for a number for you could say you could say 35 feet for everything else, or you could say 60 feet, you could say 52.8 feet, whatever.

And then if you want to make any changes later, you could come back and amend the PUD.

But if we were to approve it like it's written there, then everything outside that does not have a bill, it has no limitation for all others.

That means you put a 20-story building out there.

Wouldn't happen, but you probably could, right?

And I don't think it's fair to write that up that way.

Okay.

So I think there ought to be limitations for everything globally across the PUD.

Okay.

Whether it's 35 feet, 60 feet, whatever you want to do something else.

Okay.

Yeah, I mean, we're fine with that.

It's not like we're looking at putting a skyscraper or anything.

Well, I know, but it leaves it open.

It does leave it open as long as you can park it, right?

Right.

Yeah, but you can probably find a way.

Hello, Commissioner Gornson.

Wouldn't that limit the possibility of a hotel going in there?

Well, but the I'm I'm leaving the height number to them.

They could go in there and put a height of four stories if they want to.

Right now, you could put 20 stories in there if you want.

Is that gonna happen in Broken Air?

I don't think so.

Probably not, but it's there, and it's there for the future.

But lock it in, lock the PUD down now with the number, and if they want to change it, they come in and amend the PUD.

Just like that.

And it'll be specific to what they're asking for.

I think they need to have access to build a hotel there now.

They can.

I'm not saying they can't.

I'm saying put a limit on that.

20 years after that.

We have no number in there.

Anyway, how are you want to look at it?

So let's see, you threw me off track there.

Didn't move.

We need a pretty hotel there.

So we need to like I have no problem with the hotel.

I know you're limiting it.

Get her into a number.

Is that gonna limit some of the pretty hotels that we want?

Mm-hmm.

You put a number in there, you can always amend the PUD to put a bigger number in there.

But that's gonna cost them more money to come back and do another PUD before.

Sounds like you need to put like a thousand feet limit.

Then you cover it.

You give him another.

Yeah, yeah.

Well, I I I will say I understand his point.

I understand his point, but you know, again Well, I think when you read the if you read the statement in the PUD, if you read the ordinance of the bit PUD, it says prescribed.

And what's prescribed, it's asking you to tie it down.

And tie it down by leaving it saying unlimited to the rest of it.

I don't buy that.

How about 10 stories?

Well, if the commission wants to do that, I think that's pretty high.

But if the commission wants 10-story building there beside the highway, that's the same thing.

It will give you a pretty hotel.

It'll it'll give you flexibility.

There we go.

Yep.

But that that 10 stories lower than 20, so that makes sense to me.

Hey, middle, I'm about you know, in the middle.

Middle of the ground.

Middle or above ground.

Yeah.

Uh Graham, do we need the indicate feet or stories?

If this was to move forward.

Well, do you have the feet handy?

Okay.

If you assume 10 feet high per story or something or 12 or 15, I don't know.

I like stories might be more.

12, 15 feet, so multiply that by whatever you think is the most accurate.

Okay.

Might be 150 feet then.

Because in development area C, if we're talking about heights, we you know, we say um buildings in this development area shall not not exceed four stories in height.

So you know, we're not saying you know, four times ten is forty or four times fifteen is you know sixty.

We just I like to say it was just stories to give the flexibility.

See, I assume four stories, four-story apartments you're talking about.

So I figured the same hotel, the same you do the same thing with a hotel, four-story, five-story hotel, whatever.

You got the parking.

As long as we can park it, right?

Yeah.

Yeah.

Park on this on the roof.

Nobody needs cars.

They're gonna Uber amphitheater down the street, anyways, you know, across the way.

No, I think I'll stop there.

But I just want to know, I just want to bring make sure that you know I brought that up about the sidewalk issue because I think you have the room to put the sidewalk in.

And I understand that maybe the grade, but if you look at I think you have room.

But y'all can look at that.

But if you don't want to put the sidewalk in, why don't we get the escrow?

Just because you don't want to meet the grade that's out there doesn't mean that you eliminate the escrow as far as I'm concerned.

If the city decides to come in up in there and put a sidewalk in there with the bond issue money, then it's it's the money there.

So I agree with that.

The escrow.

Yeah, the sidewalk, yes.

Yeah, I mean, I would be more favorable for escrowing it than building it right now.

Yes, yeah.

Well, and if I read you know, going back to the collector road, that is a long distance.

And we used to deny things like this unless you put in a a jog of two or three jogs in there.

You have zero jogs in there until you get way down there.

That's a long way.

Yep.

And the sidewalk, you are putting a sidewalk on the west side of the collector road, so it would be just outside the fence.

Are y'all putting any type of landscaping outside the fence?

From what I could tell, there's not, right?

So code requires landscaping along collector roads for residential.

So we will be meeting the code when that develops.

Okay, good.

Yes.

Okay.

Yep.

I think I couldn't tell if you asked for a deviation on that or something.

I don't believe so.

I believe we were meeting the code.

I believe the code requires a 10-foot landscape edge along collectors for residential with a screening fence.

Right.

And so we are meeting that.

Right.

And just yeah, and and even though our plan shows a really straight line, you know, you're not approving that really straight line in the PUD.

You're pretty much saying, hey, we we agree with this, and then that road's got to be designed through engineering.

We're gonna have to go in and make sure that we comply with the engineering design criteria.

So I did have another one.

I go I guess I'm taking my chance, I'm gonna bring it up.

There was one area, I guess, where you called out.

I think it was the industrial area, the IL, is that area B?

Yes, on the East side.

If I read this right.

If I read this right, maybe it wasn't that location there.

But you you said that the e I think even though it's industrial, that the it's adjacent to the residential could be commercial.

Yes, is that right?

Yes.

So is that is that right to write it up like that?

If it's IL that you would put the commercial in there.

Or should it be or should that be a separate portion that's commercial zoned itself?

I mean, we identify um you can see you can identify the commercial uses as tan, call it tan.

Um, and then the industrial as gray.

So even though we have area A, B, C, and D, D actually may have more than just IL, it may have some commercial zoning in there.

Yes, it's the flexibility.

So with IL zoning, you're allowed to do industrial zoning, but you're also allowed to do commercial zoning.

So um we were just giving them the opportunity for either or there.

Yeah, when I was reading the narrative, I wasn't positive that's the way it was.

Yes, yeah, we're that's I'm good with that.

Yeah.

As long as it's clear.

Yes.

Well, clear to me.

Clear to me.

I do.

But yeah, but we were wanting to give that buffer, so in case industrial uses were being all being put put in the gray area that there was some sort of buffer between that area and the residential lots.

And we do have additional um landscape and buffer requirements between the commercial lots and the residential lots to provide that.

Okay.

One other thing, the collector road.

I hope y'all is not too bored with this, but one of the things you brought up is the collector road itself going from Houston, that's shown on the on the map, going from Houston conduction.

It's gonna be in phases, right?

So the collector road's not gonna be put in before you do all the development, right?

Correct.

Was there any discussion with the city about was the city requesting to go ahead and pull it put the collector all the way through before you finished everything up?

Uh or started each portion, I guess, each phase.

No, I mean there's been conversations, um, the conversations about phasing, about um funding, um, and all of that, you know.

That road, it's gonna be a really expensive road.

Uh yeah.

And so um however however we plat it is how the lot how the road is gonna have to be, you know, built.

So I mean, if we can get everything sold, if you know, if it moves and we can get it in quick, that's great for everybody.

Yeah.

Um, but it's you know, it's a pretty penny to put that in.

Right, and I understand that.

And I was just looking at the what the bond issue approved, which is gonna be the stretch from 209th to uh the turnpike right there, that's gonna be let's see on 81st Street or Houston Street, that's gonna be going on soon.

It's gonna be a while before that happens.

And the same thing with the intersection at 81st and Evans Road with Houston and Evans Road, that's gonna take place.

Right.

So I just wondered if this how far ahead this would be in that, but it's gonna be a while before those bonds.

It's probably gonna move quicker than government um projects, but we'll see.

Because if the road's through, that's gonna alleviate a lot of traffic probably.

Yeah, I know that I know everybody would like it, you know.

So it just has to be financial at least.

Right.

Unless the city wants to pay, you know, do it, that would be great.

I'm just kidding.

I don't think anybody's gonna make a motion for that.

I know come on.

Sorry.

Okay, no.

If I can just add, I don't recall the exact discussion during our pre-development meetings regarding the timing of completing the collector road, I'm just thinking that fire may want to see um the north axis as well.

Um just otherwise they would is residential going in first?

It depends on um the commercial is definitely going first.

So north side's going in first, um, and then with fire access, we will we do have an access to the east and to the timber ridge industrial um as well to provide two access points for fire department and everything, if the north goes first.

I'm just thinking that will be a factor in how soon that road gets done.

Correct.

Okay.

Yeah, it depends who which which area goes first.

And then you got to tie in on the stub street that's gonna go uh towards east, it's gonna tie in back where uh was it tractor supply and all that stuff is so and that will actually alleviate some of the traffic issues that you see in front of tractor supply right now with all of those businesses trying to exit and you know the the construction company with uh with all of their um trailers and everything, so it's actually gonna make this area a lot safer.

Well, I was just curious to where what would start first, the residential or the commercial industrial up north.

So I mean kind of what Jane was getting at.

It whoever wants to start writing checks as quick, you know, we'll do it.

But I mean, we have plans al already for the commercial to get started, but there's a lot of looks at the residential as well.

So um it's gonna be moving pretty quickly.

I think you've done a great job.

Thank you.

Appreciate it.

I'm like, she's so smart in all this.

Well, appreciate it.

That's a big project.

Yeah, you know, it's exciting.

I think it's gonna be great for the area.

Oh, I do too.

Yeah, yeah.

Not a 10-story building, but yeah.

Yes.

Yes, well hotel.

Yes.

Isn't it the one?

What is it?

The Renaissance that's over on 71st.

Yeah.

How many stories is that?

Oh, I think it could be 20.

Broken arrows growing.

You know, gotta be ready.

Tell me about it.

Yes, it is.

There's 11,000 people when I moved here.

Yeah.

It's changed a lot.

We can do it.

Yeah.

Wow, you're that old?

No, I I really appreciate that the mixed use, the way that's blended in, especially along the highway, because there's a lot of um, you know, a lot of times the highway, you're kind of limited in what you're able to do, but I think you did a really good design there.

Thank you.

I think that'll look look well once it comes together.

Okay, appreciate it.

I did have one other thing.

Yes, sir.

So in the narrative, there's a lot of uses, like you have places of assembly.

I know that's touchy.

You got places of assembly mentioned in a couple places, which would allow churches to go in there in two different places.

Yes, but then all the all the same thing, place where you got like permitted uses.

You also have like alcohol sales and things like that with with the able, that kind of makes it kind of tricky.

Was so there's no uses in there that you've exclusively said we're not gonna have these in there.

Everything's in there listed.

Is the is I guess all the permitted uses are basically what's out of the zoning doing this, from what I could tell.

Um, for the most part, I think we I think we probably took out like marijuana sales and stuff like that, but we didn't want to restrict it too much, you know, and give the you know limit.

So we didn't we left most of the uses in there.

I think we pulled just a few of them you know out, like the strip plug.

But see, I thought under the regist residentials at the RMF or the the R the RSC, whatever it was.

You had also listed commercial businesses in there too, correct?

In the in the residential.

I was thinking there was commercial listed in there too.

It says permitted use as dwelling single family detached only in development area D.

What about the next residential?

In C so C was um so yeah, so that was you know, RMF district standards and regulations.

So you know, multifamily, you're able to do multi-family commercial uses and the different stuff as well.

Okay, it gives you a flexibility.

So again, that was kind of the only place in the development that we wanted to allow the the possibility for multifamily, but didn't it tie it into multifamily to say, hey, if somebody else comes and they have a better use, then it makes sense to do that as well.

Yeah, see, and that's the thing.

So in where you have the RMF, it it may not be the hotel, it may end up being all commercial.

Well, hotels don't go on.

I mean, but the hotel can go anywhere.

I know, but that's the way you have it written up.

Yes, it could be commercial, not the hotel.

So anyway, I'm done.

I'm done.

Can be both.

Okay.

Any other questions for the applicant?

Thank you.

Thank you, Miss Potts.

Thank you.

Did we have anybody that wanted to speak on this or any emails?

We have nothing.

Okay.

So back to the commission.

Any comments, recommendations, motions.

Well, I will make a motion to approve item 6E per staff recommendation with the notation that sections that know that there is no limit, will have a limit of 10 stories, and there will need to be an escrow established for any future sidewalk.

On 81st.

On 81st.

Okay, good.

Thanks.

I second.

We have a motion and a second.

Get a roll call vote, please.

Mindy Payne.

Yes.

Robert Gorenson.

Yes.

Yes.

Jonathan Townsend.

Yes.

Jason Cohen.

Yes.

And that will go before city council on Monday, August 3rd at 6 30 in these chambers.

Uh item seven appeals.

We have done.

Number eight, general commission business.

We have done item nine remarks, inquiries, comments from the planning commission and staff.

Uh nothing from staff tonight.

Nothing from staff.

I just wanted to follow up on that development that was time before last.

We're in front of the senior citizen center.

The trucks parking.

Oh yeah.

The trucks parking.

The community development director has um he is on the traffic safety committee or traffic subject committee.

Traffic advisory committee.

Yes.

Um and he is bringing it to their attention.

Uh one of the adjacent property owners has reported issues with some parking uh to the police, and that has been taken care of.

Wonderful.

Thank you.

You're welcome.

Appreciate that.

Anything else?

Moving on to item 10.

I'll make a motion to adjourn.

I will second.

We have a motion and a second.

Can we get a roll call vote, please?

Mindy Payne, yes.

Robert Gorenson?

Yes.

Jalee Klempa.

Yes.

Jonathan Townsend?

Yes.

Jason Cohen.

Yes.

Thank you all very much.

Thank you, staff.

We got a whole all of us.

Isn't that nice?