Broward County Commission Workshop on Child Care and Airport Policing - May 12, 2026
Broward County Commission Workshop on Child Care and Airport Policing - May 12, 2026
This workshop covered two major items: the potential inclusion of a child care facility in the new Government Center and the feasibility of establishing an independent law enforcement agency for Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport and Port Everglades. Commissioners also briefly discussed due diligence related to the Spirit Airlines bankruptcy. No formal votes were taken, but consensus was reached on several direction points.
Discussion Items
- Child Care in Government Center: Staff presented an analysis showing that including a child care facility for 120 children would require an additional 14,000 square feet and $15.4 million in capital costs, plus $1.4 million in annual operating costs. Options included third-party operation or in-house operation. Commissioners expressed a range of positions: Senator Rich strongly supported inclusion, citing benefits for employee retention, recruitment, and modeling best practices. Commissioner Geller expressed openness to a subsidy program rather than capital expenditure and raised collective bargaining concerns. Commissioner Rogers favored a voucher system. Commissioner Fisher opposed government competing with the private sector and cited liability risks. Commissioner Udine deemed it cost-ineffective and harmful to private providers. Commissioner Davis wanted more employee survey data and opposed capital costs at the Gore site but was open to a subsidy at the Spirit site. Mayor Rich noted no consensus to include child care in the building.
- Airport Law Enforcement Feasibility: Jensen Hughes consultant Dr. Edward Denmark presented findings that it is feasible for the Broward County Aviation Department to establish its own law enforcement agency. Key advantages include direct accountability, budget control, and alignment with airport mission. Risks include recruitment challenges and startup costs. Commissioners Fisher and Geller strongly supported moving forward, with Geller advocating for combining airport and seaport policing for economies of scale. Commissioner Udine emphasized first improving the existing contract with the Broward Sheriff's Office and expressed concerns about a small department's ability to retain staff. Commissioner Davis considered the move premature and preferred to first renegotiate the BSO contract. Commissioner Rogers raised concerns about employee upward mobility and suggested including fire services. Mayor Rich announced he would bring an agenda item to proceed with creating an independent police department covering both the airport and seaport.
- Spirit Airlines Bankruptcy: Staff requested authorization to spend up to $25,000 on legal counsel for due diligence on the Spirit bankruptcy and potential acquisition of its properties. Commissioners expressed general support and noted additional funds could be ratified if needed.
Key Outcomes
- No consensus to include a child care facility in the new Government Center; staff directed not to include it in current plans.
- Mayor will place an agenda item at a future meeting to direct staff to move forward with creating an independent law enforcement agency for the airport and seaport combined.
- Staff authorized to spend up to $25,000 on legal advice regarding Spirit bankruptcy due diligence, with the understanding that further expenditures may be ratified.
Meeting Transcript
With Government Center First, thank you. We wanted to just uh this is a presentation to follow up the March um uh twenty twenty-six workshop meeting. Um at the end of that presentation and workshop, several board members requested that staff um consider restoring the child care accommodations back into uh the facility. And so um on April, uh believe April twentieth or twenty first. Um you'd received a a memo uh from Isimi uh Ayala Goyaso uh explaining all of the provisions and all of the the details on that analysis. And this is just simply to bring it back to the board to get final direction on how to proceed with that portion. Let's try it over. The demolition permitting is in process with the city and commencement of demolition activities of the Gore building is still expected to occur in summer of 2026. Environmental work and monitoring continues at the site. So going then to the memo that we shared with the board and the question of child care facilities to be included or not as part of the new government center. We uh find it timely to be able to share with you some key data. The memo was very detailed today during the presentation. We are just going to address key points, nothing else, but obviously this board can take us into details as it deems uh appropriate. We made a few um assumptions in working through the data, right? And we shows just for sake of the analysis the possibility of considering an in total enrollment in that share cut child care facility of 120 children. So if you use that number, and that number can be adjusted any way the board wishes, but we needed to make an assumption to be able to build an analysis. If you take into consideration 120 children as the base enrollment, that will require an additional 14,000 square feet of space inside the government facility. If you take that into account, that then equals about $50 million of additional building costs to be put towards the new government center. If you add that to the $663 million that we had shared with you before for the reduced recommended program, that brings your new total to $178 million. Can we go uh questions by uh issue? Um what where is 120 kids come from? I mean, right now, do we have a do we there's no child center here? So correct. Where is this 120 kids coming from? No, I think that's the same. What employees? So we were using an uh making an assumption based on some other similar um uh child care facilities uh downtown in the area. Um we looked at we looked at uh Miami Dade County and other areas that might do similar things. We were just using an assumption. I mean child care facilities are great, but uh the building here, I mean, do you have you have any idea of the you have 700 employees, how many of those have kids that would utilize this? Yeah, so so we do have analysis on and and in that memo that that was it was detailed out for the age of the workforce, the um uh the where the distribution of the workforce lives, where the distribution of our workforce works, all of that is is outlined there. We're trying to summarize it here, but it was in much greater detail um in the the memo that was provided. So uh first of all, I think I would like to know did you survey the employees? Survey the employees themselves. No, we did not. To ask that if we had a child care center here, would they use it versus something else? Yeah. No, so there was no survey done of the employees if they would want it or utilize it. But what we did do is we we utilized data that kind of uh uh looked at since the inception of our parental leave, um, that I believe actually you uh might have sponsored that um back uh in 2018, I believe it was, um, how many employees we have that have utilized the parental leave portion. And so um, and I think we've got that data and is me can I can speak to that now. Um and then we extrapolated that out. And it was really just to get a sense of, you know, the the number of employees that we have that have taken advantage of that parental leave. Even that we would assume, you know, if all of them took advantage of of that. Now, mind you, we have people spread out all over the county where they work. Um, so but even if you did that, it still would fall short of of that number, but we wanted to just give a sense of because we did that, we had we had done the assumption before we had gotten all that information back. Um again, we got that data. Um and you know it it depends on if the the objective of the board, if you guys wanted to pursue this, the the concept, the if the objective of the board is to kind of cater to the individuals and the employees that work in that building, or for all of county government, and and assuming you have to, you know, take into consideration that people are likely not going to come drive here to drop their kids off at a daycare if they work out at GC West or somewhere else. So there's a lot of assumptions that you have to kind of make and what and we needed to understand better from the board what you guys, if you wanted to pursue this, what you know what would be the objective I asked if you you uh asked. And you know, some people may not even work here because we don't have a child care center. You don't you don't know that because that the data shows, and I looked up lots of stuff because I've worked on this for years and years and years.
openpublica.com