Brunswick Planning Board Meeting – October 14, 2025: Workshops and Sketch Plan Reviews
Brunswick Planning Board Meeting – October 14, 2025
The Brunswick Planning Board held a meeting on October 14, 2025, at 4:00 PM (EDT) to consider four agenda items: two zoning amendments (for a bus garage at Coffin School and the Hawthorne School area) and two sketch plan reviews for subdivisions on Old Portland Road and Moody Road. The meeting included extensive public comment, particularly on the Garnet Ridge subdivision, which drew opposition from numerous residents and board members due to environmental, traffic, and safety concerns. The board approved all sketch plans, but with significant reservations noted for Garnet Ridge.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Garnet Ridge Subdivision (Moody Road): Multiple residents (Sarah Steadniki, Christina Angel, Braden Alster, Jade Stewart, and others) expressed strong opposition, citing traffic safety on the narrow dead-end Moody Road, harm to wildlife and vernal pools, groundwater contamination risks, and inconsistency with the town's comprehensive plan. Steve Walker (former board member) argued the waivers violate the 2008 comprehensive plan and the rural farm and forest zoning objectives. Several speakers noted that the proposal would add up to 284 daily vehicle trips and fragment a large unfragmented forest block. Others, including Councilor Sandy UpdeGraft, urged the board to deny the waivers and protect rural character.
- Other items: No public comment was offered for the bus garage zoning amendment, the Hawthorne School rezoning, or the Old Portland Road subdivision.
Discussion Items
- Bus Garage Zoning Text Amendment (Case 2544): Andy Johnston (Atlantic Resource Consultants) and Sarah Singer (School Board) explained the need to exempt public school facilities from the 5,000 sq ft maximum building footprint in growth zones. The current bus garage at 65 Columbia Ave is deteriorating and undersized; the proposed replacement (≈6,800 sq ft) exceeds the limit. The amendment would remove a contradiction that effectively prohibits building any school in those zones. The board noted that all existing school facilities are non-conforming. The workshop concluded with a plan to hold a future public hearing.
- Hawthorne School Zoning Map Amendment (Case 2550): Chrissy Adamowitz (Economic Development) proposed rezoning 46 Federal Street from GM7 to GM6 to allow higher density for redevelopment of the former school administration building. The board discussed potential impacts on surrounding properties and the ability to limit undesired uses through the RFP and deed restrictions. Staff noted that a broader zoning update will occur after the new comprehensive plan is adopted. The workshop will proceed to a public hearing.
- 346 Old Portland Road Subdivision (Case 2538): Joe Martin (Site Lines PA) presented a nine-lot open space subdivision on a 675-ft private road. The site (16.7 acres, 11.6 acres open space) includes wetlands, vernal pools, and a stream. The board discussed stormwater, road ownership, and HOA responsibilities. Public works requested a turnaround at Moody Road. The board approved the sketch plan unanimously.
- Garnet Ridge Subdivision (Case 2537): Matt Pelletier (Teradine Consultants) proposed a 22-lot open space subdivision with 34 total units (single-family, duplexes, ADUs) on a 2,520-ft private road off Moody Road. The site is in the rural farm and forest district with multiple overlays. The applicant seeks waivers for exceeding the maximum dead-end road length and number of units. Board members Laura Hatmaker, Kelly Matson, and Rob Burgess expressed concerns about fragmentation of wildlife habitat, traffic safety (284 daily trips), emergency access, water quality, and the comprehensive plan. The board noted the project cannot proceed without the waivers. Despite these concerns, the board voted 4-1 to approve the sketch plan, acknowledging the early stage of review but emphasizing the high burden for future approval.
Key Outcomes
- Bus Garage Zoning Text Amendment: Workshop held; public hearing to be scheduled.
- Hawthorne School Zoning Map Amendment: Workshop held; public hearing to be scheduled.
- 346 Old Portland Road Subdivision: Sketch plan approved unanimously; applicant to proceed to final plan.
- Garnet Ridge Subdivision: Sketch plan approved 4-1 (one dissenting vote). Board directed applicant to address traffic impact, environmental impacts, waiver justifications, and HOA governance in future submissions. The board stressed that approval of the sketch plan does not imply final approval and that the required waivers face a very high bar.
Meeting Transcript
Good evening, everyone. Um welcome to the October 14th, 2025 Brunswick Planning Board meeting. Before we begin, I would just like to introduce up here members of the planning board and staff. On my far right is Kelly Matson. Chris Baldwin is next to him. To my left is Alison Harris, and then members of the planning staff, Jimmy Dillman and Matt James. And we have four items on the agenda tonight. Two of them are uh workshops really to consider possible amendments to the um to the ordinance uh relating to uh a bus depot at Coffin School and uh a zoning change for the Hawthorne school area, and then we have two sketch plan reviews of two different subdivisions in Brunswick. Uh before we begin, I would like to read uh an introductory statement that we have used from time to time at um widely attended planning board meetings uh and explain uh the purpose of the uh of the planning board. Its duty is to oversee the application of the town of Brunswick zoning ordinance with respect to new projects that meet the threshold of needing planning board review and approval. Generally, the board cannot impose restrictions on a development unless they are prescribed by the zoning ordinance. Similarly, the board may not deny a project that meets all ordinance requirements. In carrying out our duties, the board helps to ensure that residents' concerns receive a fair hearing and that the public interest is protected. During our public meetings, we expect that members of the public abide by the rules of conduct for public meetings that are posted at the entrance of this room and on the town's uh planning board webpage. So please review those rules before offering public comment. And finally, uh members of the public who are attending and who would like to speak should go to the podium, state their names, the town in which they live, uh, and any other information they would care to provide. The public uh people attending virtually need to raise their hand. They will be promoted, ask their names and town uh town of residents, and will be welcome to ask questions or offer comments. We will limit individuals to three minutes, although people who are directly affected by a development will be given extra time to state their case. Um with that, I guess we would uh begin tonight's proceedings with the first matter before us, the zoning text amendment. And Matt, please introduce that. First off, we have case number 2544, Brunswick School Department Bus Garage Zoning Tax Amendment. The planning board will review and act upon a zoning tax amendment request by the Brunswick School Department to amend Table 4.2.3 dimensional and density standards for growth area zoning districts, exempting public school facilities from the required maximum building footprint per structure. The zoning tax amendment would facilitate constructing a bus garage on the subject of property located at 65 Columbia AV, map U27 lot 20, and within the growth residential 9 or GR9 zone, the Shoreland Protection Overlay or SPO subdistrict, and the Shoreland Protection Overlay Stream Protection or SPO SP subdistrict. Thank you. With that, um would staff like to uh provide some background on this and introduce the matter. Uh sure. Uh so the school department is in attendance tonight as well, so I um can also pass it off to them if they prefer. Um, but there was a a need to replace an existing facility at their um school campus at 65 Columbia Avenue. Um there's currently uh a small bus garage, I believe, and in order to replace it, they would um they're seeking to add a structure that would exceed the the max um building footprint. So uh currently the the text amendments are that public school facilities uh are exempted from that max building footprint. Um staff supported that and thought that was a kind of a logical uh move just given how integrated schools are into the the surrounding neighborhoods and they kind of naturally pair with the um existing conditions. So I can pass it off to the applicant if they're interested in speaking. Good evening. Uh for record, my name is Andy Johnston. I'm with Atlantic Resource Consultants. We're a consultant that does work with the school department. And I may just be able to give you a little background and a little deeper history to this uh request for a text amendment. Because it's really part of it is is due to the project they're trying to construct right now. Um but it's also to remove an existing contradiction that's been in your ordinance actually since it was adopted. Um we actually made note of this 10 years ago when the ordinance was in draft format and we were planning the Cape Furbish elementary school. And the contradiction is this is that in some of these growth zones, your ordinance allows schools to be built, but it also has a maximum building footprint of 5,000 square feet. Now, I've worked on schools for 20 years, and I can't remember a single school project that I worked on that has a building footprint of less than 5,000 square feet. So in effect, what the ordinance does now in this text is it allows schools in these districts but prohibits them from being practically built. So it's a bigger issue than just the project that's in front of you now. This actually stops a new school from practically being built in any of these zones, even though the zoning allows that use in the zone. So that's some of the background here. I I would like to think it's a fairly simple amendment just to allow schools to really be built in those zones, which I think was probably the intent of the ordinance in the first place. I just had a uh a question uh with your familiarity in terms of uh bulk and size of this uh proposed replacement building, how does that compare to uh the size of facilities of our school facilities currently? Well, so the the bus garage actually goes over that 5,000 square foot threshold, it's about 6,800 square feet.
openpublica.com