Brunswick Town Council Workshop - August 3, 2026: Data Center Ordinance and Main Street Overlay Discussion
Brunswick Town Council Workshop - August 3, 2026: Data Center Ordinance and Main Street Overlay Discussion
The town council held a workshop on Monday, August 3, 2026, to discuss two items: a proposed data center ordinance (following a June 1 moratorium) and a Main Street overlay district aimed at encouraging higher-density mixed-use development. The planning department presented initial frameworks, and the council provided feedback. Public comment was taken on the data center item. The council agreed by straw poll to set a public hearing for the Main Street overlay at the upcoming regular meeting.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Mark Battle (Bunker Street, Brunswick; member of the Climate Action Plan working group): Reminded the council of the unanimously adopted carbon reduction targets and urged that any data center be required to produce its own renewable energy without local or distant carbon emissions.
- Tucker Favreau (Brunswick; also on the Sustainability Committee, speaking as a resident): Raised technical concerns including PFAS in fire suppression systems, micro-leaks in closed-loop cooling, the need for quarterly reporting in the first two years, and the potential for community benefits agreements. He also noted that the state’s moratorium applied to 20 MW or higher, so Brunswick should not wait for state action on smaller facilities.
- William White (Union Street, Brunswick; also on the Sustainability Committee, speaking as a resident): Emphasized that material impacts such as noise, heat, and chemical pollution extend beyond zoning boundaries, urging the council to consider actual material impacts rather than abstract zoning maps.
Discussion Items
-
Data Center Ordinance: Planning Director Larry and intern Tyler McGrath presented a proposed framework distinguishing between minor (100 kW to 1 MW) and major (1 MW+) data centers, both limited to the Growth Industrial (GI) district. Minor facilities would require a conditional use permit; major facilities would require contract zoning with council approval. Key council feedback included:
- Councilor Teamy raised detailed technical concerns about heat output, closed-loop cooling, the 50% roof solar requirement, and the need for electrical usage reporting.
- Councilor Ellis expressed a preference for a total capacity cap and opposed contract zoning for major data centers, favoring a prohibition.
- Councilor Weems answered no to contract zoning and yes to further technical analysis to support a prohibition.
- Councilor McDonald supported contract zoning to allow flexibility for potential small-scale needs (e.g., hospital data centers) but suggested a proportional cap tied to industrial use.
- Councilor Perault was concerned about 1 MW being too large (equivalent to 800–4,300 homes) and asked about enforcement.
- Councilor Ecker asked about state-level efforts and supported a cap and further analysis.
- Councilor Hicks worried about loopholes where large projects could be split into smaller pieces.
- Councilor Brook noted the state's Data Center Advisory Council is working on regulations but may not produce enforceable rules until 2028–2029.
- The council’s straw poll on four guiding questions showed broad support for distinguishing by electrical demand, uncertainty on minor facility standards, opposition to contract zoning for major facilities, and support for hiring a technical expert to analyze a potential prohibition.
-
Main Street Overlay: Planning staff presented a proposed overlay district along Main Street between Mill and Noble Streets, allowing buildings up to 4.5 stories (55 ft flat roof, 65 ft pitched roof) with a 15 ft stepback above 40 ft adjacent to residential uses. Requirements include 60% ground-floor fenestration, active commercial uses, high-quality materials, and reduced parking (1 space per dwelling unit, retail parking demand studies). The overlay is based on form-based code principles and consultant Able City’s analysis. The planning board and village review board have recommended consistency with the comprehensive plan. Council feedback:
- Councilor Perault supported the concept but was concerned about parking adequacy, noting the 2025 parking study found sufficient capacity but some users may need to walk five minutes.
- Councilor Ellis supported the overlay but urged prioritization of retaining Main Street retail frontage and suggested a parking garage.
- Councilor Teamy expressed strong support with minor reservations.
- Councilor Weems requested more time for public input before action.
- Chair (Councilor McDonald) called for a straw poll on setting a public hearing that night; a majority approved, so the public hearing will be set at the regular meeting following the workshop.
Key Outcomes
- Data Center Ordinance: The council provided initial direction. Staff will continue research, address technical concerns (e.g., heat output, reporting, loopholes), and return with an updated draft. No formal vote was taken.
- Main Street Overlay: The council agreed (by straw poll) to set a public hearing for August 17, 2026, at the regular town council meeting. The formal vote to set the hearing will occur at that meeting. The overlay will be further discussed and amended as needed after public input.
Meeting Transcript
Good evening, everyone. We're gonna go ahead and get started. I'm gonna officially call this Monday, August 3rd, 2026 town council workshop to order. Looking around the table, we have all counselors present except for Counselor Anderson, who I know is gonna be coming a little bit later. Was this meeting properly noticed, town manager? Yes, it was. Perfect. Uh I'll remind folks in the audience uh to please silence your electronic devices at this time. Um and for those of you who may be newer to a workshop, um, our official uh town council meeting will be at 6 30. Um what we're gonna be doing for this next hour, hour 15 is chatting through a couple of items that need a little bit more work before they come to uh the town council to for any type of public hearing or approval. So we have two items of business uh before us. One of them is to talk about our data center ordnance that is following on the moratorium that we put in place not too long ago. Um and then the second item is to talk about uh main street overlay, um which we'll have our planning department get into the details of what that's all about. Um so the way that this is structured, it's a little bit looser. Um, but what we'll do is after each of these items, because we have two items, I'll take public comment after at the end of each one, just because folks might not be here for both of those. Sound good, everyone? Great. All right, let's go ahead and get started with uh the data center ordinance. I'll turn it over to the planning uh department director. Good evening. You're gonna be seeing quite a bit of me tonight. Um thank you, Larry. So tonight we are having a workshop to introduce the topic of data centers and discuss some initial ideas for a regulatory framework and obtain the council's feedback on how to proceed with drafting regulations. Thanks. The council will recall that on June 1st, a 180-day moratorium was adopted that applies to new enlarged or expanded data centers with an electrical capacity of one megawatt or greater. The moratorium provides time for the town to consider potential impacts on electrical and water infrastructure, noise, and the environment. Working with staff, our Bowdoin intern Tyler McGrath researched how other communities are approaching this issue and prepared the initial draft included in the council packet. Tonight we are primarily looking for guidance on whether and to what extent data centers should be allowed in Brunswick and what level of excuse me, what level of review should apply to facilities of different sizes. For reference, Brunswick already has a data center operated by First Light at Brunswick Landing. Staff estimate that facility has an electrical demand of approximately 750 kilowatts, which provides some local context for tonight's discussion. At this point, I will hand the presentation off to Tyler McGrath, and he'll give you some some background information. Hold on one second, Tyler. Counselor Williams, did you have a question for the director? I do. I have one question for the director, and that is 750 kilowatts per what day. Do you know how that works exactly? Uh so kilowatts is just the amount of power, like the rate of power. Right, right. That's a capacity number. Yeah, kilowatt hours would be the amount. Okay, great. Um, hi, I'm Tyler McGrath. I'm interning in the planning department this summer. Um, and I'm just going to go over some general information about data centers. Uh so data centers are facilities that house computer servers and other related equipment for the processing, storing, managing, and distributing of digital information and data. Um their potential impacts vary considerably depending on the scale, such as the scale or the power, the amount of power they use and the cooling technology. Um larger scale facilities may consume massive amounts of electricity and water, sometimes comparable to tens of thousands of single-family homes, as seen in the table. Um and regulations can help address these impacts through energy and water efficiency requirements, renewable energy measures, um, and other performance standards. There are no universally accepted um definitions of small, medium, and large data centers. Um this table gives a general some general examples of sizes, um, starting with micro scale data centers with around 100 to 150 kilowatt energy draws all the way to over 100 megawatts with hyper hyperscale data centers.
openpublica.com